Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Categorified structures over moduli spaces: Anomalies, non-invertible symmetries, and exceptional holonomy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper conjectures that moduli spaces of G2 and Spin(7) SCFTs carry stacks of fusion categories—Ising for Spin(7), tricritical Ising for G2—as non-invertible analogues of Bagger-Witten and Hodge line bundles.

desk verdict A plausible, clearly written conjecture that non-invertible (tricritical) Ising symmetries organize G2/Spin(7) moduli spaces, but the whole structure depends on an unproven persistence assumption that could puncture the stack. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19909 v1 pith:BRZEXO44 submitted 2025-06-24 hep-th

A. Perez-Lona , E. Sharpe , X. Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords non-invertiblesymmetriesfusioncategoriesBagger-WittenlinebundlesmodulispacesofSCFTsG2holonomySpin(7)IsingmodelD-brane
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that global symmetries of two-dimensional superconformal field theories organize geometry over moduli space even when the symmetries are non-invertible. For ordinary Calabi-Yau compactifications the worldsheet $U(1)_R$ symmetry yields Bagger-Witten line bundles; the authors argue that in compactifications on manifolds of $G_2$ or $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ holonomy, which have no continuous R-symmetry, the same role is played by rational conformal sectors: the tricritical Ising model for $G_2$ and the Ising model for $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$. Their central conjecture is that these sectors generate non-invertible fusion-category symmetries that act over moduli space as a stack of fusion categories—closed-string states forming a bundle of fusion rings and D-brane categories forming a stack of module categories—a categorified analogue of Bagger-Witten and Hodge line bundles. The paper also develops the intermediate case of anomalous invertible symmetries, where the same logic yields stacks of module categories over $\mathrm{Vec}(G,\alpha)$ and matches known 2-group structures in spacetime. The upshot is a concrete proposal for what plays the role of Bagger-Witten geometry in theories without any continuous R-symmetry.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the decomposition of the full stress tensor into a rational sector and its commuting complement, $T = T_I + T_r$, with $T_I$ the (tricritical) Ising stress tensor. Topological symmetry lines are then Verlinde lines of the rational sector tensored with the identity on the complement, $L_I \otimes 1_r$. On states, the lines act through the modular $S$-matrix as $L_i|\phi_j\rangle = (S_{ij}/S_{0j})|\phi_j\rangle$, which converts fusion data into concrete eigenvalues on cohomology; for D-branes, module categories over the fusion category are identified with algebra objects, so the regular module category supplies the brane objects. The proposal is that these data assemble over moduli space into a bundle of fusion rings for closed strings and a stack of module categories for D-branes, with associators providing the stack transition data.

What would settle it

Take a specific one-parameter family of $G_2$ or $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ compactifications and compute the operator product of the (tricritical) Ising energy operator with the marginal operator that moves along the family; if the OPE acquires a nonzero piece at generic parameter values, the two sectors do not commute and the topological lines break, ruling out the conjectured stack. A second check: exhibit a D-brane at any moduli point that is not an object of the regular module category of the Ising or tricritical Ising fusion category.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that moduli spaces of SCFTs associated with $G_2$ and $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ holonomy carry a stack of fusion categories acting as a non-invertible analogue of the Bagger-Witten/Hodge line bundle. Concretely, the $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ case is governed by the Ising fusion category and the $G_2$ case by the tricritical Ising fusion category; the paper computes how their Verlinde lines act on cohomology, obtaining one-dimensional representations of the fusion algebra in each case, and identifies the D-brane category with the regular module category over the relevant fusion category. The conjectured structure has two layers: a bundle of fusion rings acting on vector bundles of closed-string states (a rigidification), and a stack of module categories over the fusion category acting on families of D-brane categories, with the associators supplying the stack gluing. This is meant as the direct generalization of the worldsheet $U(1)_R$ story, with the (tricritical) Ising sector playing the role of the $U(1)_R$ current algebra and its spectral-flow operator the role of the holomorphic top-form section.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in every SCFT under consideration the energy-momentum tensor splits into two commuting pieces—a (tricritical) Ising piece and the rest—so that the proposed topological lines $L_I \otimes 1_r$ exist and remain topological at every point of the moduli space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The moduli space of $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ SCFTs would carry a stack of fusion categories whose local symmetry data is the Ising fusion category, subsuming the discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ R-symmetry but containing strictly more structure.
  • The moduli space of $G_2$ SCFTs would carry an analogous stack for the tricritical Ising fusion category, whose Fibonacci subcategory is itself a non-invertible symmetry acting on the space.
  • Closed-string ground states would form vector bundles over moduli space whose transition functions are valued in the fusion ring, with the analogue of the spectral-flow operator serving as a section; the Hodge line-bundle story is recovered as the invertible special case.
  • D-brane categories would fiber over moduli space as a stack of module categories over the relevant fusion category, with F-symbols providing the gluing data, so anomaly-like data invisible in closed strings is visible in open strings.
  • The anomalous invertible case (e.g., the compact-boson momentum/winding $\mathbb{Z}_2$) would be the intermediate instance where the same framework reduces to a stack of module categories over $\mathrm{Vec}(\mathbb{Z}_2,\omega)$, matching 2-group structures in spacetime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the commuting-sector assumption is strong enough that finding even one moduli point where $T_I$ and $T_r$ mix would disprove the stack conjecture without constructing the full stack.
  • Inference: the paper's cohomology tables leave an ambiguity in the $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ case about which of $H^2$ or $H^4$ carries eigenvalue $+2$ versus $0$; checking this on an explicit compact example would sharpen the state-cohomology dictionary.
  • Inference: if the conjecture extends across families, the Fibonacci subcategory of the tricritical Ising theory would act separately on $G_2$ moduli data, suggesting a hierarchy of non-invertible constraints on marginal operators that the paper does not spell out.
  • Inference: the modified Bianchi identity in the anomalous circle example has a known 2-group avatar, so the non-invertible case should have a similar cohomological avatar—e.g., a 2-gerbe or higher group—at string tree level, a direction the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a categorified extension of the Bagger–Witten and Hodge line-bundle story to moduli spaces of SCFTs with non-invertible symmetries. Sections 2–4 develop a general framework in which non-anomalous invertible symmetries give principal bundles acting on closed-string state bundles and D-brane stacks, anomalous invertible symmetries give fusion-category bundles of type Vec(G,α) and associated stacks, and non-invertible fusion categories are conjectured to give bundles of fusion rings and stacks of module categories over moduli space. The main new proposal, in Section 5, is that moduli spaces of G2 and Spin(7) holonomy SCFTs carry a stack of fusion categories with fibers given by the tricritical Ising category (G2) and the Ising category (Spin(7)), based on the coset construction c=7/10 and c=1/2 from [7] and on the assumed stress-tensor factorization T = T_I + T_r. Evidence is provided by acting with Verlinde lines on chiral states and cohomology via the modular S matrix, and by describing D-branes as objects of the regular module category. The paper explicitly leaves the actual stack construction to future work.

Significance. If correct, the proposal would supply a genuinely new global structure over exceptional-holonomy moduli spaces, generalizing Bagger–Witten/Hodge bundles to non-invertible symmetries and giving a categorical organizing principle for closed-string states and D-branes. The paper is careful to label the central object as a conjecture and to identify the missing construction. The consistency checks are mostly standard but transparent: the Verlinde-line actions follow from published modular S matrices, the one-dimensional representation analysis is straightforward, and no parameters are fitted. The compact-boson/anomalous-Z2 example is a useful bridge that cleanly illustrates the difference between fusion-ring-level and fusion-category-level data. The main risk is that the existence of the proposed stack rests on an unproven persistence assumption for the (tricritical) Ising sector across moduli space, and the cohomology-level evidence contains an acknowledged ambiguity. Both issues are addressable in revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1.1, Eqs. (5.5)–(5.7)] The topological lines L_I ⊗ 1_r, and therefore every fiber of the proposed stack, require the decomposition T = T_I + T_r with T_I(z)T_r(w) ∼ 0 to hold at every point of the G2/Spin(7) moduli space. The paper cites [7] for this factorization but does not show that exactly marginal deformations preserve the (tricritical) Ising sector as a closed, commuting conformal subalgebra. If a marginal operator couples T_I to T_r, the commutator [L_I ⊗ 1_r, T] acquires a nonzero coefficient and the line ceases to be topological, so the stack would have no fiber at that point. Please either prove persistence using the quantum numbers of the marginal operators, or elevate the persistence to an explicit conjecture with supporting evidence. This is the most load-bearing step in the paper, since the stack is built fiber-by-fiber from these lines.
  2. [§5.2.1, cohomology table after Eq. (5.26)] The D-eigenvalue assignment for H2⊕H4− is explicitly left as “one reasonable interpretation” in the paragraph following the table. The subsequent claim that cohomology transforms as one-dimensional representations, and the statement that this is trivial to check, depend on this assignment. Because both |0,1/2⟩_L|0,1/2⟩_R and |1/16,7/16⟩_L|1/16,7/16⟩_R have the same η eigenvalue, the Z2 action does not disambiguate the options. The paper should either compute the D action on H2 and H4− directly, for example from the geometric action of the Cayley 4-form, or explicitly list the eigenvalue assignment as an open issue. As written, the Spin(7) cohomology check is incomplete, although it is supporting evidence rather than the core existence claim.
  3. [§1 and §A.1] The central object—a stack of fusion categories over the moduli space—is not constructed; the text says the construction is left for future work, and Appendix A.1 repeats that the technical stack/2-vector-bundle considerations are not computed. I do not treat this as an error, because the paper explicitly labels the structure as a conjecture, but the conjecture would be substantially more checkable if the paper specified the stack data: the fibered category over the moduli space, the gluing/descent 2-cocycles (or F-symbol data) on triple overlaps, and the action on D-brane categories. Please state precisely what would need to be proven to promote the conjecture to a theorem, and clarify which parts of Sections 5.2–5.3 are consistency checks versus steps of a construction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and OCR artifacts that should be corrected, including “uopn” (Section 1), “parimaries” (Section 5.2.1), “Verline” (Section 5.1.1), “Hibert” (Section 2.1.2), and “Mori ta” (Section 5.3).
  2. [§2.1.2] The text defines A-branes and B-branes to preserve the same combination Q_L+Q_R; one of the two displayed combinations should presumably be Q_L−Q_R (or the conjugate supercharge).
  3. [References [46] and [69]] These references are listed as “private communication,” which the reader cannot verify. They should be replaced by published sources or removed.
  4. [§5.3] The notation D is used both for the Ising line and for D-branes in the module-category discussion; this is occasionally confusing and should be disambiguated.
  5. [§5.2.2] The G2 cohomology table assigns a single set of eigenvalues to H2⊕H4 and H3⊕H5 even though the text notes that states with those quantum numbers can appear with multiplicity; the same caveat that appears in the Spin(7) discussion should be stated explicitly for the G2 table.
  6. [Table 1] Abbreviations such as “rigid. of Vec(G,α)-stack” are unexplained; spell out “rigidification” and define the stack terminology at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central stack conjecture is a conditional proposal built on the external Shatashvili–Vafa result and standard Verlinde data; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is explicitly conjectural: it proposes a stack of fusion categories over G2 and Spin(7) moduli spaces, motivated by the (tricritical) Ising sectors identified in the external work [7] and by the general analogy with Bagger–Witten line bundles. The load-bearing input, Eq. (5.5) (T = T_I + T_r with T_I(z)T_r(w) ~ 0), is quoted from [7] rather than derived in this paper, and the paper transparently flags the moduli-space persistence of this decomposition as an assumption rather than a derived consequence. The cohomology actions in Sections 5.2 and 5.3 are consistency checks using the standard Verlinde-line formula L_i|phi_j> = (S_ij/S_0j)|phi_j> and one-dimensional representations of the same fusion rings; no parameter is fitted and no prediction is secretly renamed input. The citation to [68] for the non-gaugeability of the Ising category is not load-bearing: the same conclusion follows from the paper's own Appendix A.3 criterion involving non-integer quantum dimensions, and the central conjecture does not require gaugeability. No self-definitional, fitted-input, uniqueness-importing, or ansatz-smuggling pattern is present. The proposal is therefore self-contained as a conditional conjecture, with all nontrivial assumptions stated explicitly.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; all numerical inputs are standard modular data from the Ising and tricritical Ising CFTs. The main postulated entities are the stack and bundle structures, which are not constructed.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The full stress tensor decomposes into commuting (tricritical) Ising and remainder sectors, T = T_I + T_r.
    Stated in Section 5.1.1 based on [7]; needed to construct topological lines L_I tensor 1_r as symmetries of the full SCFT.
  • domain assumption Dictionary between RR ground states and cohomology of G2 and Spin(7) manifolds from [7].
    Used in Section 5.2 to translate line actions on states into actions on cohomology groups.
  • domain assumption The manifold is connected and has no enhanced supersymmetry, so b0 = 1 and b1 = 0 (and b6 or b7 = 0).
    Stated in Section 5.2 to fix multiplicities of cohomology groups in the state-cohomology dictionary.
  • standard math Verlinde line action formula L_i |phi_j> = S_ij / S_0j |phi_j>.
    Standard RCFT result used throughout Section 5.2 to compute actions of line operators on primaries.
  • standard math Module categories over a fusion category correspond to algebra objects in that category (Ostrik's theorem).
    Used in Section 5.3 to identify D-brane categories as regular module categories for Ising and tricritical Ising.
invented entities (2)
  • Stack of fusion categories over moduli spaces of G2 and Spin(7) SCFTs
    purpose: Acts as a non-invertible analogue of Bagger-Witten and Hodge line bundles, organizing closed string states and D-brane categories over the moduli space.
    This structure is conjectured; no explicit construction or independent falsifiable prediction is given beyond internal consistency checks on cohomology actions.
  • Bundle of fusion rings over moduli space, acting on vector bundles of closed string states
    purpose: Serves as a rigidification of the stack, capturing the fusion ring action while forgetting associator data.
    Proposed in Section 4 and Table 1 as the closed-string counterpart; no construction is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Categorified structures over moduli spaces: Anomalies, non-invertible symmetries, and exceptional holonomy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRZEXO44

@misc{pith2026250619909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Categorified structures over moduli spaces: Anomalies, non-invertible symmetries, and exceptional holonomy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRZEXO44}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19909}
}
read the original abstract

In this note, we propose an extension of the relation between worldsheet global symmetries and structures over moduli spaces of superconformal field theories (SCFTs) to include noninvertible symmetries. The most familiar examples of such structures associated to an ordinary symmetry are the Bagger-Witten line bundles, which arise over the moduli spaces of two-dimensional N=(2,2) SCFTs from a non-anomalous worldsheet U(1)_R symmetry and its associated spectral flow operators. Generalizing this setting, we consider examples involving anomalous worldsheet symmetries, which, despite not being gaugeable, can still give rise to global structures over moduli space -- as illustrated by the momentum/winding symmetries in toroidal compactifications and higher group gauge symmetry structure in spacetime. Motivated by this analogy, we conjecture the existence of a stack of fusion categories over moduli spaces of G_2 and Spin(7) holonomy manifolds which acts as a noninvertible analogue of the Hodge or Bagger-Witten line bundles over Calabi-Yau moduli spaces. This proposal is based on the observation that SCFTs associated with such exceptional holonomy manifolds contain (tricritical) Ising sectors that play a role analogous to the U(1)_R symmetry in N=2 theories. Although these symmetries are not gaugeable, they behave similarly to anomalous invertible symmetries, providing the conceptual foundation for the proposed moduli space structure.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher Structures on Boundary Conformal Manifolds: Higher Berry Phase and Boundary Conformal Field Theory

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 2-form higher Berry connection on boundary conformal manifolds is defined from boundary-condition-changing operator OPE phases; it reproduces the B-field and WZ term in string theory examples.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [7]

    Superstrings and manifold of exceptional holonomy,

    S. L. Shatashvili and C. Vafa, “Superstrings and manifold of exceptional holonomy,”Selecta Math. 1 (1995) 347, arXiv:hep-th/9407025

    arXiv 1995

  2. [1]

    Quantization of Newton’s constant in certain supergravity theories,

    E. Witten and J. Bagger, “Quantization of Newton’s constant in certain supergravity theories,” Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 202–206

    1982

  3. [2]

    Kahler geometry of the space of 𝑁 = 2 superconformal field theories,

    V. Periwal and A. Strominger, “Kahler geometry of the space of 𝑁 = 2 superconformal field theories,” Phys. Lett. B 235 (1990) 261–267

    1990

  4. [3]

    Notes on N=2 sigma models,

    J. Distler, “Notes on N=2 sigma models,” arXiv:hep-th/9212062

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Quantization of Fayet-Iliopoulos Parameters in Supergravity

    J. Distler and E. Sharpe, “Quantization of Fayet-Iliopoulos Parameters in Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 085010, arXiv:1008.0419 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  6. [5]

    Sums over topological sectors and quantization of Fayet-Iliopoulos parameters,

    S. Hellerman and E. Sharpe, “Sums over topological sectors and quantization of Fayet-Iliopoulos parameters,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 15 (2011) 1141–1199, arXiv:1012.5999 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [6]

    An overview of Bagger-Witten line bundles,

    E. Sharpe, “An overview of Bagger-Witten line bundles,” arXiv:2412.09198 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Chern-Simons theory, decomposition, and the A model,

    T. Pantev, E. Sharpe, and X. Yu, “Chern-Simons theory, decomposition, and the A model,” JHEP 10 (2024) 112, arXiv:2406.18633 [hep-th] . – 36 –

    arXiv 2024

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    D. D. Joyce, Riemannian holonomy groups and calibrated geometry, vol. 12. Oxford University Press, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Extension of 𝑁 = 2 superconformal algebra and Calabi-Yau compactification,

    S. Odake, “Extension of 𝑁 = 2 superconformal algebra and Calabi-Yau compactification,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 557–568

    1989

  3. [11]

    On the global moduli of Calabi–Yau threefolds,

    R. Donagi, M. Macerato, and E. Sharpe, “On the global moduli of Calabi–Yau threefolds,” Asian J. Math. 26 no. 4, (2022) 585–612, arXiv:1707.05322 [math.AG]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Global aspects of moduli spaces of 2d SCFTs,

    R. Donagi, M. Macerato, and E. Sharpe, “Global aspects of moduli spaces of 2d SCFTs,” Commun. Math. Phys. 392 no. 3, (2022) 1063–1098, arXiv:1906.11254 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bagger–Witten line bundles on moduli spaces of elliptic curves,

    W. Gu and E. Sharpe, “Bagger–Witten line bundles on moduli spaces of elliptic curves,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 no. 35, (2016) 1650188, arXiv:1606.07078 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Local and global theory of the moduli of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    A. Todorov, “Local and global theory of the moduli of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Algebraic Geometry and Singularities (Spanish) (Sevilla, 2001), vol. 19, pp. 687–730. 2003. https://doi.org/10.4171/RMI/365

    2001 doi

  7. [15]

    Ray Singer analytic torsion of Calabi Yau manifolds I,

    A. Todorov, “Ray Singer analytic torsion of Calabi Yau manifolds I,”arXiv:math/0004045 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Anomalies, conformal manifolds, and spheres,

    J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, Z. Komargodski, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, and S. Theisen, “Anomalies, conformal manifolds, and spheres,” JHEP 03 (2016) 022, arXiv:1509.08511 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Conformal field theories and compact curves in moduli spaces,

    R. Donagi and D. R. Morrison, “Conformal field theories and compact curves in moduli spaces,” JHEP 05 (2018) 021, arXiv:1709.05355 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    String theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    B. R. Greene, “String theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 96): Fields, Strings, and Duality, pp. 543–726. 6, 1996. arXiv:hep-th/9702155

    1996 arXiv

  11. [19]

    D-branes, derived categories, and Grothendieck groups,

    E. R. Sharpe, “D-branes, derived categories, and Grothendieck groups,” Nucl. Phys. B 561 (1999) 433–450, arXiv:hep-th/9902116

    1999 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Category theory for conformal boundary conditions,

    J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, “Category theory for conformal boundary conditions,” Fields Inst. Commun. 39 (2003) 25, arXiv:math/0106050

    2003 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Derived categories and zero-brane stability,

    P. S. Aspinwall and A. E. Lawrence, “Derived categories and zero-brane stability,” JHEP 08 (2001) 004, arXiv:hep-th/0104147

    2001 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lectures on D-branes and sheaves,

    E. Sharpe, “Lectures on D-branes and sheaves,” arXiv:hep-th/0307245

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    D-branes on Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    P. S. Aspinwall, “D-branes on Calabi-Yau manifolds,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2003): Recent Trends in String Theory, pp. 1–152. 3, 2004. arXiv:hep-th/0403166

    2003 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,

    S. L. Adler, “Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426–2438

    1969

  17. [25]

    A PCAC puzzle: 𝜋0→𝛾𝛾 in the𝜎 model,

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: 𝜋0→𝛾𝛾 in the𝜎 model,” Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47–61

    1969

  18. [26]

    Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135–157

    1980

  19. [27]

    Kahler cone substructure,

    E. R. Sharpe, “Kahler cone substructure,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1999) 1441–1462, arXiv:hep-th/9810064

    1999 arXiv

  20. [28]

    The edge of supersymmetry: Stability walls in heterotic theory,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and B. Ovrut, “The edge of supersymmetry: Stability walls in heterotic theory,” Phys. Lett. B 677 (2009) 190–194, arXiv:0903.5088 [hep-th] . – 37 –

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Stability walls in heterotic theories,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and B. Ovrut, “Stability walls in heterotic theories,” JHEP 09 (2009) 026, arXiv:0905.1748 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in string theory,

    M. Dine, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, “Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 589–598

    1987

  23. [31]

    Massive U(1)s and heterotic five-branes on K3,

    G. Honecker, “Massive U(1)s and heterotic five-branes on K3,” Nucl. Phys. B 748 (2006) 126–148, arXiv:hep-th/0602101

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Merging heterotic orbifolds and K3 compactifications with line bundles,

    G. Honecker and M. Trapletti, “Merging heterotic orbifolds and K3 compactifications with line bundles,” JHEP 01 (2007) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0612030

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Higgs bundles and UV completion in F-theory,

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt, “Higgs bundles and UV completion in F-theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 287–327, arXiv:0904.1218 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    The Atiyah class and complex structure stabilization in heterotic Calabi-Yau compactifications,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and B. Ovrut, “The Atiyah class and complex structure stabilization in heterotic Calabi-Yau compactifications,”JHEP 10 (2011) 032, arXiv:1107.5076 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    One-loop renormalization of BPS string masses in pseudo-anomalous heterotic string,

    J. A. Harvey and T. W. Hu, “One-loop renormalization of BPS string masses in pseudo-anomalous heterotic string,” arXiv:2502.14055 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Heterotic flux backgrounds and their IIA duals,

    I. V. Melnikov, R. Minasian, and S. Theisen, “Heterotic flux backgrounds and their IIA duals,” JHEP 07 (2014) 023, arXiv:1206.1417 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, vol. 205 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/205

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  31. [39]

    A note on toroidal compactification of heterotic string theory,

    K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi, and E. Witten, “A note on toroidal compactification of heterotic string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 279 (1987) 369–379

    1987

  32. [40]

    Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them,

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, “Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them,”JHEP 11 (2021) 053, arXiv:2012.00009 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    From loop groups to 2-groups,

    J. C. Baez, D. Stevenson, A. S. Crans, and U. Schreiber, “From loop groups to 2-groups,” arXiv:math/0504123

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Central extensions of smooth 2–groups and a finite-dimensional string 2–group,

    C. J. Schommer-Pries, “Central extensions of smooth 2–groups and a finite-dimensional string 2–group,” Geom. Topol. 15 no. 2, (2011) 609–676, arXiv:0911.2483 [math.AT]

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Differential cohomology in a cohesive infinity-topos,

    U. Schreiber, “Differential cohomology in a cohesive infinity-topos,” arXiv:1310.7930 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Central extensions of higher groups: Green-Schwarz mechanism and 2-connections,

    M. J. Kang and S. Kang, “Central extensions of higher groups: Green-Schwarz mechanism and 2-connections,” arXiv:2311.14666 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Higher-dimensional algebra. V. 2-groups,

    J. C. Baez and A. D. Lauda, “Higher-dimensional algebra. V. 2-groups,” Theory Appl. Categ. 12 (2004) 423–491, arXiv:math/0307200 [math.QA]

    2004 arXiv

  38. [46]

    private communication,

    T. Pantev, “private communication,”

  39. [47]

    Differential twisted String and Fivebrane structures,

    H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, “Differential twisted String and Fivebrane structures,” Commun. Math. Phys. 315 (2012) 169–213, arXiv:0910.4001 [math.AT]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    The cyclic groups and the free loop space,

    G. E. Carlsson and R. L. Cohen, “The cyclic groups and the free loop space,” Comment. Math. Helv. – 38 – 62 no. 3, (1987) 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02564455

    1987 doi

  41. [49]

    Gauge enhancement of super M-branes via parametrized stable homotopy theory,

    V. Braunack-Mayer, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, “Gauge enhancement of super M-branes via parametrized stable homotopy theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 371 no. 1, (2019) 197–265, arXiv:1806.01115 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Griffiths, J

    P. Griffiths, J. W. Morgan, and J. W. Morgan, Rational homotopy theory and differential forms, vol. 16. Springer, 1981

    1981

  43. [51]

    Differential forms and the topology of manifolds,

    D. Sullivan, “Differential forms and the topology of manifolds,” in Manifolds—Tokyo 1973 (Proc. Internat. Conf., Tokyo, 1973), pp. 37–49. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 1975

    1973

  44. [52]

    A model for cyclic homology and algebraic𝐾-theory of 1-connected topological spaces,

    M. Vigu ´e-Poirrier and D. Burghelea, “A model for cyclic homology and algebraic𝐾-theory of 1-connected topological spaces,” J. Diff. Geom. 22 no. 2, (1985) 243–253

    1985

  45. [53]

    Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants,

    V. Ostrik, “Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants,” Transform. Groups8 no. 2, (2003) 177–206, arXiv:math/0111139

    2003 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Remarks on boundaries, anomalies, and noninvertible symmetries,

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, Y. Sanghavi, and S.-H. Shao, “Remarks on boundaries, anomalies, and noninvertible symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 12, (2023) 125005, arXiv:2305.09713 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Super-Lie∞ T-duality and M-theory,

    G. Giotopoulos, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, “Super-Lie∞ T-duality and M-theory,” arXiv:2411.10260 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bundle gerbes and moduli spaces,

    P. Bouwknegt, V. Mathai, and S. Wu, “Bundle gerbes and moduli spaces,” J. Geom. Phys. 62 (2012) 1–10, arXiv:1107.3687 [math.DG]

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Nonassociative star product deformations for D-brane world volumes in curved backgrounds,

    L. Cornalba and R. Schiappa, “Nonassociative star product deformations for D-brane world volumes in curved backgrounds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 225 (2002) 33–66, arXiv:hep-th/0101219

    2002 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Star products from open strings in curved backgrounds,

    M. Herbst, A. Kling, and M. Kreuzer, “Star products from open strings in curved backgrounds,” JHEP 09 (2001) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0106159

    2001 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Cyclicity of nonassociative products on D-branes,

    M. Herbst, A. Kling, and M. Kreuzer, “Cyclicity of nonassociative products on D-branes,” JHEP 03 (2004) 003, arXiv:hep-th/0312043

    2004 arXiv

  52. [60]

    An introduction to nonassociative physics,

    R. J. Szabo, “An introduction to nonassociative physics,” PoS CORFU2018 (2019) 100, arXiv:1903.05673 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Quantization of magnetic Poisson structures,

    R. J. Szabo, “Quantization of magnetic Poisson structures,” Fortsch. Phys. 67 no. 8-9, (2019) 1910022, arXiv:1903.02845 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    𝑁 = 1/2 supersymmetry in two-dimensions,

    M. Sakamoto, “ 𝑁 = 1/2 supersymmetry in two-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 151 (1985) 115–118

    1985

  55. [63]

    Supersymmetric sigma models and the heterotic string,

    C. M. Hull and E. Witten, “Supersymmetric sigma models and the heterotic string,” Phys. Lett. B 160 (1985) 398–402

    1985

  56. [64]

    Unidexterous D=2 supersymmetry in superspace,

    R. Brooks, F. Muhammad, and S. J. Gates, “Unidexterous D=2 supersymmetry in superspace,” Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 599–620

    1986

  57. [65]

    Trialities of minimally supersymmetric 2d gauge theories,

    S. Gukov, D. Pei, and P. Putrov, “Trialities of minimally supersymmetric 2d gauge theories,”JHEP 04 (2020) 079, arXiv:1910.13455 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    2dN = (0, 1) gauge theories and Spin(7) orientifolds,

    S. Franco, A. Mininno, A. M. Uranga, and X. Yu, “2dN = (0, 1) gauge theories and Spin(7) orientifolds,” JHEP 03 (2022) 150, arXiv:2110.03696 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups,

    D. Tambara and S. Yamagami, “Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups,” Journal of Algebra 209 no. 2, (1998) 692–707. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021869398975585. – 39 –

    1998

  60. [68]

    Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases,

    A. Perez-Lona, D. Robbins, E. Sharpe, T. Vandermeulen, and X. Yu, “Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases,” JHEP 02 (2024) 154, arXiv:2311.16230 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    private communication,

    R. Bryant, “private communication,”

  62. [70]

    Applied conformal field theory,

    P. H. Ginsparg, “Applied conformal field theory,” in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena. 9, 1988. arXiv:hep-th/9108028

    1988 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Generalized twisted partition functions,

    V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber, “Generalized twisted partition functions,” Phys. Lett. B 504 (2001) 157–164, arXiv:hep-th/0011021

    2001 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Classical and quantum conformal field theory,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Classical and quantum conformal field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 177

    1989

  65. [73]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal field theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

    1997

  66. [74]

    Conformal invariance, unitarity and two-dimensional critical exponents,

    D. Friedan, Z.-a. Qiu, and S. H. Shenker, “Conformal invariance, unitarity and two-dimensional critical exponents,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1575–1578

    1984

  67. [75]

    Superconformal invariance in two-dimensions and the tricritical Ising model,

    D. Friedan, Z.-a. Qiu, and S. H. Shenker, “Superconformal invariance in two-dimensions and the tricritical Ising model,” Phys. Lett. B 151 (1985) 37–43

    1985

  68. [76]

    Details of the nonunitarity proof for highest weight representations of the Virasoro algebra,

    D. Friedan, S. H. Shenker, and Z.-a. Qiu, “Details of the nonunitarity proof for highest weight representations of the Virasoro algebra,” Commun. Math. Phys. 107 (1986) 535

    1986

  69. [77]

    Categorical-symmetry resolved entanglement in conformal field theory,

    P. Saura-Bastida, A. Das, G. Sierra, and J. Molina-Vilaplana, “Categorical-symmetry resolved entanglement in conformal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 10, (2024) 105026, arXiv:2402.06322 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    von Neumann subfactors and non-invertible symmetries,

    X. Yu and H. Y. Zhang, “von Neumann subfactors and non-invertible symmetries,” arXiv:2504.05374 [hep-th]

  71. [79]

    Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions,

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions,” JHEP 01 (2019) 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Compact Riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomy 𝐺 2. I,

    D. D. Joyce, “Compact Riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomy 𝐺 2. I,” J. Diff. Geom. 43 no. 2, (1996) 291–328

    1996

  73. [81]

    Compact Riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomy G2. II,

    D. D. Joyce, “Compact Riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomy G2. II,” J. Diff. Geom 43 no. 2, (1996) 329–375

    1996

  74. [82]

    Compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin (7),

    D. Joyce, “Compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin (7),” Invent. Math. 123 no. 3, (1996) 507–552

    1996

  75. [83]

    A new construction of compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin (7),

    D. Joyce, “A new construction of compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin (7),” J. Diff. Geom 53 no. 1, (1999) 89–130

    1999

  76. [84]

    unpublished notes,

    D. Pei, S.-T. Yau, and X. Yu, “unpublished notes,”

  77. [85]

    Two-categorical bundles and their classifying spaces,

    N. A. Baas, M. B ¨okstedt, and T. A. Kro, “Two-categorical bundles and their classifying spaces,”J. K-Theory 10 no. 2, (2012) 299–369, arXiv:math/0612549 [math.AT] . https://doi.org/10.1017/is012001012jkt181

    2012 arXiv

  78. [86]

    On noncommutative equivariant bundles,

    F. D’ Andrea and A. De Paris, “On noncommutative equivariant bundles,”Comm. Algebra 47 no. 12, (2019) 5443–5461, 1606.09130 [math.RA]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    ˇCech cocycles for quantum principal bundles,

    Z. Skoda, “ ˇCech cocycles for quantum principal bundles,” arXiv:1111.5316 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Quantum group gauge theory on quantum spaces,

    T. Brzezinski and S. Majid, “Quantum group gauge theory on quantum spaces,” Commun. Math. – 40 – Phys. 157 (1993) 591–638, arXiv:hep-th/9208007. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 167, 235 (1995)]

    1993 arXiv

  81. [89]

    On synthetic interpretation of quantum principal bundles,

    T. Brzezi ´nski, “On synthetic interpretation of quantum principal bundles,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. ASJE. Math. 35 no. 1D, (2010) 13–27, arXiv:0912.0213 [math.QA]

    2010 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Characterization of principal bundles: the noncommutative algebraic case,

    W. J. Ugalde, “Characterization of principal bundles: the noncommutative algebraic case,” arXiv:2402.16852 [math.QA] . https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16852

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Quantum principal bundles as Hopf-Galois extensions,

    M. Durdevic, “Quantum principal bundles as Hopf-Galois extensions,” arXiv:q-alg/9507022 [q-alg]. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9507022

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Differential calculi on quantum principal bundles over projective bases,

    P. Aschieri, R. Fioresi, E. Latini, and T. Weber, “Differential calculi on quantum principal bundles over projective bases,”Commun. Math. Phys. 405 no. 6, (2024) 136, arXiv:2110.03481 [math.QA]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Tensor products of finitely cocomplete and abelian categories,

    I. L. Franco, “Tensor products of finitely cocomplete and abelian categories,” J. Algebra 396 (2013) 207–219, arXiv:1212.1545 [math.QA]

    2013 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Topological quantum field theories from compact Lie groups,

    D. S. Freed, M. J. Hopkins, J. Lurie, and C. Teleman, “Topological quantum field theories from compact Lie groups,” in A Celebration of Raoul Bott’s Legacy in Mathematics. 5, 2009. arXiv:0905.0731 [math.AT]

    2009 arXiv

  87. [95]

    2-vector bundles,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “2-vector bundles,” arXiv:2106.12198 [math.DG]

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    The insidious bicategory of algebra bundles,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “The insidious bicategory of algebra bundles,” arXiv:2204.03900 [math.DG]

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    Notes on generalized global symmetries in QFT,

    E. Sharpe, “Notes on generalized global symmetries in QFT,” Fortsch. Phys. 63 (2015) 659–682, arXiv:1508.04770 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Exploring 2-group global symmetries,

    C. C ´ordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator, “Exploring 2-group global symmetries,”JHEP 02 (2019) 184, arXiv:1802.04790 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  91. [99]

    On 2-group global symmetries and their anomalies,

    F. Benini, C. C ´ordova, and P.-S. Hsin, “On 2-group global symmetries and their anomalies,”JHEP 03 (2019) 118, arXiv:1803.09336 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  92. [100]

    2-group global symmetries and anomalies in six-dimensional quantum field theories,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator, “2-group global symmetries and anomalies in six-dimensional quantum field theories,” JHEP 04 (2021) 252, arXiv:2009.00138 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  93. [101]

    2-group symmetries of 6D little string theories and T-duality,

    M. Del Zotto and K. Ohmori, “2-group symmetries of 6D little string theories and T-duality,” Annales Henri Poincare 22 no. 7, (2021) 2451–2474, arXiv:2009.03489 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  94. [102]

    2-group global symmetries, hydrodynamics and holography,

    N. Iqbal and N. Poovuttikul, “2-group global symmetries, hydrodynamics and holography,” arXiv:2010.00320 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Fusion categories and homotopy theory,

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, “Fusion categories and homotopy theory,” Quantum Topol. 1 no. 3, (2010) 209–273, arXiv:0909.3140 [math.QA] . https://doi.org/10.4171/QT/6. With an appendix by Ehud Meir

    2010 arXiv

  96. [104]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 353–497, arXiv:hep-th/0204148

    2002 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry,

    Y. Choi, D.-C. Lu, and Z. Sun, “Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry,” JHEP 01 (2024) 142, arXiv:2310.19867 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries, part 2: higher multiplicity cases,

    A. Perez-Lona, D. Robbins, E. Sharpe, T. Vandermeulen, and X. Yu, “Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries, part 2: higher multiplicity cases,” arXiv:2408.16811 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    Gauging non-invertible symmetries: Topological – 41 – interfaces and generalized orbifold groupoid in 2d QFT,

    O. Diatlyk, C. Luo, Y. Wang, and Q. Weller, “Gauging non-invertible symmetries: Topological – 41 – interfaces and generalized orbifold groupoid in 2d QFT,” arXiv:2311.17044 [hep-th]

  100. [108]

    Anomaly resolution by non-invertible symmetries,

    A. Perez-Lona, D. Robbins, S. Roy, E. Sharpe, T. Vandermeulen, and X. Yu, “Anomaly resolution by non-invertible symmetries,” arXiv:2504.06333 [hep-th] . – 42 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.