Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Boundary Bethe ansatz in massive $AdS_3$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz works for every massive representation of the $AdS_3\times S^3\times T^4$ integrable model, with singlet and vector boundaries, and writes the resulting auxiliary Bethe…

desk verdict Competent, derivation-based boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz for all massive representations of AdS3 x S3 x T4 with universal auxiliary Bethe equations (3.108); the step to general M is a sketch rather than a proof, and the introduction overclaims about the non-auxiliary equations. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20133 v1 pith:5SZK2K7Q submitted 2025-06-25 hep-th

Daniele Bielli , Vasileios Moustakis , Alessandro Torrielli This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords boundaryalgebraicBetheansatzAdS3integrabilitymassiverepresentationsreflectionmatricesdualYang-Baxterequationtransfermatrixdiagonalizationequationsmagnonexcitations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz can be carried out for every massive representation of the integrable string $\sigma$ model on $AdS_3\times S^3\times T^4$, for both singlet and vector boundaries. It derives a single universal form of the auxiliary Bethe equations, $g_D^a(q_i)\,\lambda_2^{(N)}(q_i)=\lambda_1^{(N)}(q_i)$, valid for all four building-block representations ($L$, $R$, $\tilde L$, $\tilde R$) in the auxiliary, physical, and boundary spaces. A sympathetic reader should care because the result gives explicit algebraic eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the transfer matrix in the massive sector, which is the step that normally unlocks momentum-carrying Bethe equations and, eventually, boundary thermodynamics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the double-row monodromy $T_-^{ab}$ built by moving an auxiliary particle through $N$ physical sites and reflecting it off the wall, together with its dual $T_+^{ab}$. The engine of the argument is the dual boundary Yang-Baxter equation (3.3), which, with the explicitly solved dual $K$-matrices, gives transfer-matrix commutativity; the recursive formulas (3.88)-(3.95) for $\lambda_1^{(N)}$ and $\lambda_2^{(N)}$ then convert that commutativity into algebraic diagonalization. The final identity that carries the result is the universal Bethe equation $g_D^a(q_i)\lambda_2^{(N)}(q_i)=\lambda_1^{(N)}(q_i)$, where $g_D^a$ is the diagonal entry of the dual reflection matrix.

What would settle it

Compute the transfer-matrix commutator $\big[\tau^{ab}(p_0,p_B),\tau^{ab}(p_0',p_B)\big]$ for a vector boundary with a dual monodromy that acts nontrivially on the boundary space, rather than as the singlet dual times the identity; the paper's argument predicts a nonzero commutator, so an explicit example with a vanishing commutator would refute the structural constraint. Alternatively, check the closed eigenvalue formula (3.95) against direct two-site matrix diagonalization for a vector boundary with mixed physical representations not covered by the checks in the text, such as boundary $L$ with physical sites $(R,L)$; any mismatch falsifies the universal recursion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the massive sector of the $AdS_3\times S^3\times T^4$ worldsheet theory is amenable to the full boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz. The authors construct the double-row monodromy $T_-^{ab}$ from the bulk $R$-matrices of [8] and the reflection matrices of [24], solve the dual boundary Yang-Baxter equation for $T_+^{ab}$, and prove that the transfer matrix $\tau^{ab}(p_0,p_B)=\operatorname{str}_0(T_+^{ab}T_-^{ab})$ commutes at different auxiliary momenta. They then identify the pseudo-vacuum for every choice of representations, compute the eigenvalues $\lambda_1^{(N)}$ and $\lambda_2^{(N)}$ of the diagonal operators in closed recursive form, and show that $M$-magnon states created by products of $B$ operators are eigenstates precisely when $g_D^a(q_i)\lambda_2^{(N)}(q_i)=\lambda_1^{(N)}(q_i)$ for $i=1,\dots,M$, with $a,b\in\{L,R,\tilde L,\tilde R\}$. A structural result accompanies the derivation: for vector boundaries, the requirement that $T_-$ and $T_+$ commute under fermion-number conservation forces the dual monodromy to act trivially on the boundary, $K_D^{ab}(p_0,p_B)=K_D^a(p_0)\otimes 1_B$, so the vector case reduces to singlet-like dual data. The paper also shows that the standard $A,B,C,D$ exchange relations can be derived only when the two auxiliary spaces carry representations whose $R$-matrix is of genuine 6-vertex type, whereas the Bethe ansatz itself works for any auxiliary representation.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes the dual monodromy can be chosen to act only on the auxiliary space, not on the physical particles or the boundary; if a genuinely boundary-coupled dual object turned out to be necessary, the commutativity proof for the transfer matrix would fail and the Bethe equations would rest on nothing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any singlet or vector boundary and any massive representation content, the transfer matrix of the massive $AdS_3\times S^3\times T^4$ model is diagonalized by explicit $M$-magnon states, so the spectrum-generating part of the boundary Bethe ansatz is complete in the massive sector.
  • The explicit eigenvectors provide the input needed to formulate the momentum-carrying Bethe equations, which quantize the magnon momenta, and then to set up the boundary thermodynamic Bethe ansatz.
  • The universal form of the equations means results obtained for one representation, say $L$, transfer immediately to the other three, $R$, $\tilde L$, and $\tilde R$, after substituting the corresponding dual and monodromy eigenvalues.
  • The proof that vector boundaries force a singlet-like dual monodromy simplifies all future boundary computations: the extra boundary degree of freedom enters only through the initial condition $\omega^{ab}$ in the eigenvalue recursion.
  • The genuine-versus-fake six-vertex distinction identifies exactly which choices of two auxiliary spaces admit the standard exchange relations, guiding the choice of auxiliary representation in practical computations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave implicit that the universal Bethe-equation form is likely to survive in mixed massive-massless settings if one rewrites the data in Zhukovsky variables; this is testable by repeating the one-magnon calculation with one massless physical site.
  • Because the braided exchange factor for two $B$ operators cancels in the Bethe equations but governs operator ordering, it may become physically visible in finite-volume or norm computations, where ordering-dependent phases contribute; the paper does not pursue that.
  • The fake-6-vertex obstruction suggests that a change of creation and annihilation basis, in the spirit of vertex-model transformations, could extend the standard exchange relations to the remaining auxiliary-representation pairs; constructing such a map explicitly is a concrete next step.
  • If the vector-boundary dual really is boundary-blind, the reflection data of vector walls may feed into boundary thermodynamics through the same singlet dual functions, potentially making vector-wall TBA no harder than singlet TBA; this is an inference, not a paper claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz (ABA) to massive representations of the AdS3×S3×T4 integrable system. After reviewing the bulk R-matrices and the singlet/vector reflection matrices from [8,24,22], the authors construct the double-row monodromy and the dual monodromy, derive the dual boundary Yang-Baxter equation, and obtain auxiliary Bethe equations in a universal form, Eq. (3.108), for all combinations of L, R, tL, tR representations in the auxiliary, physical, and boundary spaces, for both singlet and vector boundaries. They also derive closed-form expressions for the vacuum eigenvalues λ_1, λ_2 in Eq. (3.95), verify the N=1,2 and M=1,2 cases, and classify auxiliary-representation pairs into 'genuine 6-vertex' and 'fake 6-vertex' classes in appendix F.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is the first complete boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz for the massive sector of the model, providing explicit algebraic eigenvectors and auxiliary Bethe equations that are prerequisites for momentum-carrying Bethe equations and boundary thermodynamics. The paper is careful and largely self-contained: it supplies explicit R- and K-matrices, proves that the double-row monodromy satisfies the boundary Yang-Baxter equation for arbitrary representations (appendix C), derives the dual equation and transfer-matrix commutativity (appendix E), and reports concrete M=1,2 and N=2 symbolic checks, including all N=2 physical-representation combinations in the singlet mixed case. The universal compact form of λ_1, λ_2 and the 6-vertex/fake-6-vertex classification are useful contributions. However, the universal Bethe equations (3.108) for arbitrary magnon number M rest on an unproven inductive step, and the general-N vacuum and eigenvalue formulas in the fully mixed vector case are inferred from a pattern rather than demonstrated. These gaps affect the advertised completeness of the result and require attention before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3.2, Eq. (3.108)] The universal Bethe equations (3.108) are asserted for arbitrary magnon number M after explicit one-magnon (3.99–3.102) and two-magnon (3.103–3.106) computations, with the generalization justified only by 'in the spirit of the previous sections'. No inductive proof is supplied that acting with A and D on a string of M B-operators and reordering via (F.5)–(F.7) leaves only terms proportional to the single-magnon conditions g_D^a(q_i)λ_2(q_i)=λ_1(q_i). Because the B-operators obey the braided exchange relation (3.18)/(F.5), the ordering of creation operators matters and the cancellation of unwanted terms requires tracking exchange factors across the whole string; the M=2 calculation already required 'massive cancellation' and 'implementing the exchange factors'. This is the central load-bearing claim of the paper, so the general-M statement either needs a complete induction argument (for example, adapting the proof in appendix D of [26] to the braided exchange algebra) or must be explicitly downgraded to M≤2.
  2. [§3.3.2, Eqs. (3.84)–(3.95)] The general-N pseudo-vacuum and the eigenvalues λ_1, λ_2 of Eq. (3.95) are obtained by inspecting N=1 (3.69–3.75) and then postulating the N→N+1 pattern (3.85)–(3.87). The text states that using only the induction hypothesis (3.82) is 'not sufficient' and that the R-matrix structure must be used, but no complete proof is given that the proposed vacuum is annihilated by C^{(ab)}_{(N)} for arbitrary N. Since (3.95) enters directly into the Bethe equations (3.108), this is load-bearing. In addition, no explicit N=2 verification is reported for the fully mixed vector-boundary case; §3.3.1 checks N=2 only for the all-L case, and §3.2.2 checks N=2 for the singlet case with mixed physical representations. An explicit check for the fully mixed vector case, or a complete inductive proof, is needed before (3.108) can be claimed for all representation combinations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2.1, Eq. (3.32)] The left-hand side 'τ0B1...BM|0⟩N' is written without momentum arguments; it should read 'τ(p0)B(q1)...B(qM)|0⟩N' to match the product over m=1,...,M on the right-hand side.
  2. [§3.3.2, Eq. (3.107)] The prefactor contains 'φ̃aa(p0,q1) φ̃aa(p0,q1)' with the same argument twice; the second factor should presumably be φ̃aa(p0,q2), as in the two-magnon result (3.106).
  3. [§3.2.2, Eq. (3.47)] The list of μ-matrices contains 'μ12' twice; the second occurrence, associated with F^RL_{p_{N+1},-p0} E12, should presumably be 'μ21'.
  4. [Appendix F.2] The phrase 'not immediately duable' should read 'not immediately doable'.
  5. [Figure 2] The caption is difficult to parse; in particular, the description of 'the C's (and C′ for when the boundary is excited)' would benefit from a more explicit definition of the coefficients shown in the figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The massive boundary Bethe equations are derived from explicit R/K matrices and exchange relations; the self-citations are methodological, not definitional.

full rationale

The central output (3.108) is obtained by combining the explicit one- and two-magnon unwanted-term cancellations (3.99)-(3.105) with the universal eigenvalues (3.95), which are built recursively from the independent R-matrices (2.10)-(2.16) and K-matrices (2.27)-(2.39). The parameters s and s_D are boundary-condition inputs fixed before the Bethe equations are written; they are not fitted to reproduce (3.108), and (3.108) is a genuine constraint on the magnon rapidities q_i. The massless paper [26] is invoked mainly as a methodological template (RTRT algebra, dual equation, recursion structure), while the massive exchange relations and eigenvalue recursions are derived in this paper, with N=1,2 checks and explicit symbolic computations. The appeal to appendix D of [26] for the M>=3 exchange-factor cancellation is a self-citation and the inductive step is only sketched, so this is a proof gap rather than a circular reduction: the present derivation does not assume (3.108) as an input, and the cited massless proof is a separate setting rather than a restatement of the massive result. Similarly, the reflection matrices from [22,24] are external solutions of the BYBE/BIE used as inputs, not outputs of the Bethe ansatz. Appendices D and E derive the dual-monodromy constraint and transfer-matrix commutativity rather than presupposing the Bethe equations. No constructional equivalence, fitted-parameter renaming, or load-bearing self-citation chain was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the paper is an algebraic derivation using known R-matrices, known reflection matrices, and a constrained dual monodromy. The free parameters are the boundary condition parameters s and s_D. The axioms are mostly standard domain assumptions from prior integrability literature, plus two ad hoc modeling choices: the trivial-extension dual monodromy and the fictitious massive treatment of the tilde representations.

free parameters (2)
  • s = free complex parameter
    Boundary parameter in the singlet K-matrices (2.27) and vector K-matrices (2.33)-(2.39); chosen by hand to parametrize the integrable boundary condition, not fitted to data.
  • s_D = free complex parameter
    Dual boundary parameter in the dual K-matrices (3.5) and (3.8); it enters the Bethe equations (3.108) and is chosen by hand. The mixed dual BYBE imposes relations among per-representation constants (3.7).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The bulk R-matrices (2.10)-(2.16) of [8] satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation (2.17) and unitarity (2.19)-(2.20).
    Invoked in the appendix C proof that the double-row monodromy satisfies the BYBE, and throughout the derivation of exchange relations. The paper takes these identities as given from the prior literature rather than proving them.
  • domain assumption The reflection matrices (2.27)-(2.39), from [24] and [22], solve the boundary Yang-Baxter equation (2.21) and the boundary intertwining equation (2.24).
    The boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz builds the double-row monodromy from these K-matrices; their BYBE and BIE properties are the starting point of the construction.
  • domain assumption The transfer matrix is defined as τ = str0(T_+ T_-) and is required to commute for different auxiliary momenta; this holds when T_- satisfies the right-wall BYBE and T_+ satisfies the dual BYBE.
    Standard boundary algebraic Bethe ansatz setup following Sklyanin [31]; the paper constructs the dual equation (3.3) for this purpose.
  • ad hoc to paper The dual monodromy acts trivially on physical and boundary spaces, [T_+^{ab}] = K_D^a(p0) ⊗ 1_N ⊗ 1_B (eq. 3.56).
    Derived in appendix D under the requirement [T_-, T_+] = 0 and fermion-number conservation; it restricts the solution space of the dual equation. If this choice were not available, the commutativity proof in appendix E breaks down.
  • domain assumption Pseudo-vacua are determined by the 6-vertex vs fake-6-vertex classification of the R and K matrices: bosonic factors for genuine 6-vertex, fermionic for fake 6-vertex (section 3.3.2).
    Verified explicitly at N=1, 2, 3 and then assumed for all N; it is a pattern emerging from the matrix structures rather than proven inductively.
  • ad hoc to paper The tilde representations are treated as massive bookkeeping devices; the physical massless sector is recovered by a careful limit.
    The authors state this explicitly in section 2.1: 'the benefit of including fictitious massive tilde representations ... more compact, while the correct massless expressions can still be recovered'.
  • domain assumption The analysis restricts to the psu(1|1)^4_c.e. part of the symmetry algebra, ignoring the so(4)^2 torus sector.
    Section 2.1 states that it is sufficient to ignore the so(4)^2 sector and restrict to A = su(1|1)^2_c.e. representations, following [24,22].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boundary Bethe ansatz in massive $AdS_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5SZK2K7Q

@misc{pith2026250620133,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boundary Bethe ansatz in massive $AdS_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5SZK2K7Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20133}
}
abstract

In this paper we perform the boundary algebraic Bethe Ansatz for massive representations of the $AdS_3 \times S^3 \times T^4$ integrable system. This is a companion analysis to our study of massless representations \cite{Bielli:2024bve}. Our treatment is comprehensive of all possible assortments of tensor-factor polarisations which build the physical representations in the spectrum, and includes different choices of auxiliary spaces, revealing subtle differences in the procedure. We survey both singlet and vector boundaries, obtaining the auxiliary Bethe equations in very general form for all cases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20133 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pictorial view of a right-wall. The bulk dynamics takes place on its left and excitations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The schematic structure of the eigenstate in the form of a travelling excitation. The disturbance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Boundary Bethe ansatz in massless AdS3

    D. Bielli, V. Moustakis and A. Torrielli,Boundary Bethe ansatz in massless AdS 3,J. Phys. A58 (2025) no.4, 045402 [arXiv:2408.15674]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Babichenko, B

    A. Babichenko, B. Stefa´ nski, jr. and K. Zarembo,Integrability and theAdS 3/CFT 2 correspondence, JHEP1003(2010) 058 [arXiv:0912.1723]

    arXiv 2010

  3. [2]

    Sfondrini,Towards integrability forAdS 3/CFT 2,J

    A. Sfondrini,Towards integrability forAdS 3/CFT 2,J. Phys. A48(2015) 023001 [arXiv:1406.2971]

    arXiv 2015

  4. [3]

    Integrable strings for AdS/CFT

    R. Borsato,Integrable strings for AdS/CFT[arXiv:1605.03173]. F. K. Seibold and A. Sfondrini, AdS3 Integrability, Tensionless Limits, and Deformations: A Review,[arXiv:2408.08414]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [4]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Foundations of theAdS 5×S 5 Superstring. Part I,J. Phys. A42(2009) 254003 [arXiv:0901.4937]. N. Beisert, C. Ahn, L. F. Alday, Z. Bajnok, J. M. Drummond, L. Freyhult, N. Gromov, R. A. Janik, V. Kazakov and T. Klose,et al. Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett. Math. Phys.99(2012) 3-32 [arXiv:1012.3982]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [5]

    Ohlsson Sax and B

    O. Ohlsson Sax and B. Stefa´ nski, jr.,Integrability, spin-chains, and theAdS3/CFT 2 correspondence, JHEP1108(2011) 029 [arXiv:1106.2558]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [6]

    Borsato, O

    R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, and A. Sfondrini,A dynamicsu(1|1) 2 S-matrix forAdS 3/CFT 2,JHEP 1304(2013) 113 [arXiv:1211.5119]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [7]

    Borsato, O

    R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, and A. Sfondrini,All-loop Bethe ansatz equations forAdS 3/CFT 2, JHEP1304(2013) 116 [arXiv:1212.0505]. R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefa´ nski, jr. and A. Torrielli,The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS 3×S 3×T 4: the massive sector,JHEP1308(2013) 043 [arXiv:1303.5995]. 42

    arXiv 2013

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Borsato, O

    R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefa´ nski, jr.,The complete AdS 3×S 3×T 4 worldsheet S matrix,JHEP10(2014) 066 [arXiv:1406.0453]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Beccaria, F

    M. Beccaria, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, G. Macorini, and A. Tseytlin,Quantum corrections to spin- ning superstrings inAdS 3×S 3×M 4: determining the dressing phase,JHEP1304(2013) 006 [arXiv:1211.6090]. P. Sundin and L. Wulff,World-sheet scattering inAdS 3/CFT 2,JHEP1307 (2013) 007 ...

    2013 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Ohlsson Sax, B

    O. Ohlsson Sax, B. Stefa´ nski, jr. and A. Torrielli,On the massless modes of theAdS 3/CFT 2 integrable systems,JHEP1303(2013) 109 [arXiv:1211.1952]. O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefa´ nski, jr.,Integrability and the Conformal Field Theory of the Higgs branch,JHEP1506 ...

    2013 arXiv

  4. [11]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Massless factorized scattering and sigma models with topological terms,Nucl. Phys. B379(1992) 602. P. Fendley, H. Saleur and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Massless flows, 2. The Exact S-matrix approach,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8(1993) 5751 [arXiv:...

    1992

  5. [12]

    Bombardelli, B

    D. Bombardelli, B. Stefa´ nski, jr. and A. Torrielli,The low-energy limit ofAdS3/CFT 2 and its TBA, JHEP1810(2018) 177 [arXiv:1807.07775]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Lloyd and B

    T. Lloyd and B. Stefa´ nski,AdS 3/CFT 2, finite-gap equations and massless modes,JHEP1404 (2014) 179 [arXiv:1312.3268]. A. Pittelli, A. Torrielli and M. Wolf,Secret symmetries of type IIB superstring theory onAdS 3×S 3×M 4,J. Phys. A47(2014) 455402 [arXiv:1406.2840]. A. Prinsl...

    2014 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Hoare and A

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin,Towards the quantum S-matrix of the Pohlmeyer reduced version of AdS5×S 5 superstring theory,Nucl. Phys. B851(2011) 161 [arXiv:1104.2423]. B. Hoare,Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS 3×S 3×M 4 superstrings,Nucl. Phys. B891(2015) 259 [arXiv...

    2011 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, B. Stefa´ nski, jr., and A. Torrielli,Quantum Spectral Curve forAdS3/CFT 2: a proposal,JHEP12(2021) 048 [arXiv:2109.05500]. S. Ekhammar and D. Volin,Monodromy Boot- strap forsu(2|2)Quantum Spectral Curves: From Hubbard model toAdS 3/CFT 2,JHEP03(2022)...

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Cavagli` a, S

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and P. Ryan,Exploring the Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3/CFT 2,JHEP12(2023) 089 [arXiv:2211.07810]. S. Ekhammar,An Exploration of Q-Systems: From Spin Chains to Low-Dimensional AdS/CFT,Uppsala thesis

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and B. Stefa´ nski, jr.,Demystifying the Massless Sector inAdS 3 Quantum Spectral Curve,[arXiv:2412.11915]

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    Frolov and A

    S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,Massless S matrices forAdS 3/CFT 2,JHEP04(2022) 067 [arXiv:2112.08895]. S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,New Dressing Factors forAdS 3/CFT 2,JHEP04 (2022) 162 [arXiv:2112.08896]. S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,Mirror Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for AdS3/CFT 2,J...

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    F. K. Seibold and A. Sfondrini,Transfer matrices forAdS 3/CFT 2,JHEP05(2022), 089 [arXiv:2202.11058]. A. Brollo, D. le Plat, A. Sfondrini and R. Suzuki,Tensionless Limit of Pure–Ramond-Ramond Strings andAdS 3/CFT 2,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 161604 [arXiv:2303.02120]. S. Frolov...

    2022 arXiv

  13. [20]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and V. Sriprachyakul,Tensionless strings onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1, [arXiv:2411.16848]. M. R. Gaberdiel, F. Lichtner and B. Nairz,Anomalous dimensions in the sym- 44 metric orbifold,[arXiv:2411.17612]. M. R. Gaberdiel, D. Kempel and B. Nairz,AdS 3×S 3 magnons in t...

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Frolov, D

    S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,On mixed-flux worldsheet scattering in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP11 (2023) 055 [arXiv:2306.17553]. N. Baglioni, D. Polvara, A. Pone and A. Sfondrini,On the worldsheet S matrix of theAdS 3/CFT 2 mixed-flux mirror model,JHEP05(2024), 237 [arXiv:2308.15...

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Bielli, V

    D. Bielli, V. Gautam, V. Moustakis, A. Prinsloo and A. Torrielli,Boundary scattering in massless AdS3,JHEP07(2024), 266 [arXiv:2403.18594]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Ghoshal and A

    S. Ghoshal and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 3841 [erratum: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9(1994) 4353] [arXiv:hep-th/9306002]

    1994 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Prinsloo, V

    A. Prinsloo, V. Regelskis and A. Torrielli,Integrable open spin-chains in AdS3/CFT2 correspon- dences,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 106006 [arXiv:1505.06767]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Fontanella and A

    A. Fontanella and A. Torrielli,Geometry of Massless Scattering in Integrable Superstring,JHEP 1906(2019) 116 [arXiv:1903.10759]. A. Fontanella, O. Ohlsson Sax, B. Stefa´ nski and A. Torrielli, The effectiveness of relativistic invariance in AdS 3,JHEP1907(2019) 105 [arXiv:1905.00757]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bed¨ urftig and H

    G. Bed¨ urftig and H. Frahm,Opent−Jchain with boundary impurities,J. Phys. A32.25(1999)

    1999

  20. [28]

    Links and A

    J. Links and A. Foerster,On the construction of integrable closed chains with quantum supersym- metry,J. Phys. A30.7(1997) 2483

    1997

  21. [29]

    A. M. Grabinski and H. Frahm,Non-diagonal boundary conditions for super spin chains,J. Phys. A43.4(2010) 045207

    2010

  22. [30]

    J. R. Links and M. D. Gould,Integrable systems on open chains with quantum supersymmetry,Int. J. Mod. Phys.B10.25(1996) 3461. M. J. Martins and X. W. Guan,Integrable supersymmetric cor- related electron chain with open boundaries,Nucl. Phys. B562(1999) 433 [arXiv:solv-int/9907...

    1996 arXiv

  23. [31]

    E. K. Sklyanin,Boundary Conditions for Integrable Quantum Systems,J. Phys. A21(1988), 2375- 2389

    1988

  24. [32]

    Majumder, O

    S. Majumder, O. O. Sax, B. Stefa´ nski and A. Torrielli,Protected states inAdS 3 backgrounds from integrability,J. Phys. A54(2021) 415401 [arXiv:2103.16972]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Torrielli,A study of integrable form factors in massless relativisticAdS 3,J

    A. Torrielli,A study of integrable form factors in massless relativisticAdS 3,J. Phys. A55(2022) no.17, 175401 [arXiv:2106.06874]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Levkovich-Maslyuk,The Bethe ansatz,J

    F. Levkovich-Maslyuk,The Bethe ansatz,J. Phys. A49(2016), 323004 [arXiv:1606.02950]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bajnok,Equivalences between spin models induced by defects,J

    Z. Bajnok,Equivalences between spin models induced by defects,J. Stat. Mech.0606(2006), P06010 [arXiv:hep-th/0601107]. R. I. Nepomechie and A. L. Retore,Surveying the quantum group symme- tries of integrable open spin chains,Nucl. Phys. B930(2018), 91-134 [arXiv:1802.04864]. M...

    2006 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Doikou,From affine Hecke algebras to boundary symmetries,Nucl

    A. Doikou,From affine Hecke algebras to boundary symmetries,Nucl. Phys. B725(2005), 493-530 [arXiv:math-ph/0409060]

    2005 arXiv

  29. [37]

    R. I. Nepomechie and E. Ragoucy,Analytical Bethe ansatz for the open AdS/CFTSU(1|1)spin chain,JHEP12(2008), 025 [arXiv:0810.5015]. 46

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lloyd, O

    T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefa´ nski, jr.,The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS 3×S 3×T 4 with mixed three-form flux,Nucl. Phys. B891(2015), 570-612 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.12.019 [arXiv:1410.0866]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Torrielli,A study of form factors in relativistic mixed-flux AdS 3,JHEP03(2024), 082 [arXiv:2312.17557]

    A. Torrielli,A study of form factors in relativistic mixed-flux AdS 3,JHEP03(2024), 082 [arXiv:2312.17557]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius, M. Preti and N. S. Sokolova,Probing Line Defect CFT with Mixed-Correlator Bootstrability,[arXiv:2412.07624]. F. Coronado, S. Komatsu and K. Zarembo, Coulomb Branch and Integrability,[arXiv:2506.07222]. R. Demjaha and K. Zarembo,String Inte-...

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    De Leeuw, C

    M. De Leeuw, C. Paletta, A. Pribytok, A. L. Retore and A. Torrielli,Free Fermions, vertex Hamil- tonians, and lower-dimensional AdS/CFT,JHEP02(2021), 191 [arXiv:2011.08217]. 47

    2021 arXiv

  34. [4584]

    A. J. Bracken, X. Y. Ge, Y. Z. Zhang and H. Q. Zhou,Integrable open-boundary conditions for theq-deformed supersymmetricUmodel of strongly correlated electrons,Nucl. Phys. B516(1998) 588 [arXiv:cond-mat/9710141]. A. Appel and B. Vlaar,Boundary transfer matrices arising from qu...

    1998 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.