Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 83 references

Interfacial reconstruction effects in insulating double perovskite Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$/SrTiO$_3$ and Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$/NdGaO$_3$ thin films

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Polarity compensation at a double-perovskite interface creates Mn3+ layers that stretch the lattice and reorient Mn orbitals.

desk verdict Solid structural work on rotational domains and lattice profiles, but the central orbital-symmetry claim needs a quantitative TEY depth-weighted analysis before it is secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20264 v1 pith:U652ATBH submitted 2025-06-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Nandana Bhattacharya , Ranjan Kumar Patel , Siddharth Kumar , Prithwijit Mandal , Jyotirmay Maity , Christoph Klewe , Zhan Zhang , Hua Zhou
show 1 more author
Srimanta Middey
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords doubleperovskiteNd2NiMnO6interfacialreconstructionpolaritycompensationorbitalpolarizationX-raylineardichroismoctahedralrotationdomainsultrathinfilms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the functional behavior of an ultrathin ferromagnetic insulator film is set not by its average strain but by what happens at its two boundaries. For Nd2NiMnO6 films on SrTiO3, the polar mismatch between alternating charged layers forces Mn ions near the interface into a Mn3+ state, which expands the out-of-plane lattice constant in the first few unit cells; at the free surface, missing apical oxygen produces Mn2+ ions and a second expansion near the surface. Comparing with films on NdGaO3, where neither mismatch exists, the paper isolates these two effects and shows that the sign of the Mn orbital polarization measured by X-ray linear dichroism reverses with thickness as surface and interface contributions trade dominance. A sympathetic reader would care because the ferromagnetism of this double perovskite is believed to be governed by orbital-dependent superexchange, so the paper offers a structural mechanism for the thickness-dependent magnetism seen in ultrathin films.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three experimental tools working together. 1D coherent Bragg rod analysis (COBRA) converts the specular crystal truncation rod into a layer-resolved electron density profile, from which the out-of-plane lattice parameter of each atomic plane is extracted; this is what reveals the interfacial and surface expansions. Half-order Bragg rod diffraction maps the octahedral rotation pattern (Glazer tilt system) of the whole film, distinguishing the three rotational domains on STO from the single domain on NGO. X-ray linear dichroism (XLD), defined as the difference between in-plane and out-of-plane polarized X-ray absorption at the Mn and Ni L edges, reports the orbital occupancy: positive XLD means preferential occupation of the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital, negative XLD means $d_{3z^2-r^2}$, and the comparison between the two substrates separates strain-driven from polarity-driven orbital effects.

What would settle it

Grow the same 10 uc NNMO film on STO with a thin STO or other nonpolar capping layer to eliminate the surface Mn2+ contribution, and measure Mn L-edge XLD with depth-sensitive detection (partial or total electron yield at different kinetic energies). If the positive XLD remains after capping, interfacial Mn3+ dominates the orbital signal; if it flips negative or vanishes, the uncapped-film assignment was wrong. Alternatively, an XLD measurement on a 20 uc film with the top layers etched away would leave the interfacial contribution isolated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the layer-resolved out-of-plane lattice parameter $c_{\mathrm{pc}}$ of Nd2NiMnO6 (NNMO) films carries the signature of electronic reconstruction at both the film/substrate interface and the free surface. Using 1D coherent Bragg rod analysis of specular synchrotron X-ray diffraction, the authors find that $c_{\mathrm{pc}}$ is enlarged for the first 3–4 unit cells at the NNMO/SrTiO3 interface and again in the last few unit cells near the surface, while the middle of the film is relaxed. They attribute the interfacial expansion to Mn3+ ions created by polarity compensation—Mn3+ has a larger ionic radius than the Mn4+ it replaces—and the surface expansion to Mn2+ formed by symmetry breaking at the surface. The structural investigation also shows that NNMO/STO films contain three coexisting octahedral rotational domains ($a^-a^-c^+$, $a^-a^+c^-$, $a^+a^-c^-$), whereas NNMO/NdGaO3 films are single-domain $a^-b^+c^-$. The X-ray linear dichroism results then connect this structure to orbital physics: a negative XLD at the Mn L2 edge appears for films on NGO and for the 5 uc film on STO, where surface Mn2+ states dominate, while a positive XLD appears for 10 and 20 uc films on STO, which the authors assign to interfacial Mn3+ under tensile strain. The paper concludes that thickness-dependent Mn orbital polarization in these films is controlled by the competition among polar catastrophe, epitaxial strain, and surface symmetry breaking.

Load-bearing premise

The positive XLD signature in the 10 and 20 uc STO films is attributed to interfacial Mn3+ even though the measurement averages over the entire film depth, and the paper does not quantitatively separate the interfacial Mn3+, surface Mn2+, and bulk-like Mn4+ contributions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thickness-dependent ferromagnetism in NNMO/STO films can be understood as a consequence of the orbital reconstruction: the interfacial Mn3+ layers with $d_{x^2-y^2}$ occupation modify the Ni–Mn superexchange that governs the magnetic order.
  • In the very thin limit (5 uc), the surface effect wins, so any device that relies on the ferromagnetic interfacial state must either cap the film or engineer the surface termination to suppress Mn2+ formation.
  • Because the $a^-a^-c^+$ rotation domain can support hybrid improper ferroelectricity, selectively stabilizing this domain by strain engineering could turn the ferromagnetic insulator into a multiferroic.
  • The same layer-resolved structural analysis can be applied to other A2BB'O6 double perovskites on nonpolar substrates to predict where polarity compensation will localize charge and alter magnetism.
  • The absence of these reconstructions in NNMO/NGO films marks NGO as the cleaner substrate for studying intrinsic double-perovskite magnetism in ultrathin form.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The TEY probing depth (~9–10 nm) exceeds the film thickness for all samples, so the measured XLD is a whole-film average; the paper's attribution of the positive XLD in 10 and 20 uc films specifically to interfacial Mn3+ would become directly testable with depth-resolved XLD, e.g., by varying the electron yield mode or by capping one film with STO to remove the surface Mn2+ contribution.
  • The same polarity-compensation argument predicts that other polar double perovskites grown on nonpolar cubic substrates will show a comparable interfacial Mn3+/lattice-expansion signature; the layer-resolved COBRA approach is transferable to any epitaxial oxide and could be used to search for such reconstructions.
  • If the $a^-a^-c^+$ domain is the one that carries the ferroelectric instability, then controlling the relative populations of the three rotational domains—for instance, by choosing a substrate with different lattice mismatch or by growing on vicinal surfaces—would be a way to tune the multiferroic response of NNMO films.
  • The authors' distinction between 'interfacial' and 'surface' reconstructions is drawn at the structural level; magnetometry on the same thickness series, ideally with a surface-sensitive probe, would test whether the Mn2+ surface layer is magnetically inert or actively participates in the exchange network.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates ultrathin Nd2NiMnO6 (NNMO) films grown on SrTiO3 (STO) and NdGaO3 (NGO) substrates using synchrotron X-ray diffraction, coherent Bragg rod analysis (COBRA), and X-ray linear dichroism (XLD). The authors report that films on STO exhibit three octahedral rotational domains, whereas films on NGO show a single domain. COBRA analysis reveals an enhanced out-of-plane lattice parameter near the interface for STO films and near the surface for both substrates, attributed to Mn3+ formation at the polar interface and Mn2+ formation at the surface. XLD measurements show a thickness-dependent sign of Mn orbital polarization for STO films, which the authors interpret as a competition between interfacial and surface effects. The central claim is that these structural alterations control the Mn orbital symmetry.

Significance. The study provides a valuable comparative dataset on a ferromagnetic insulating double perovskite in ultrathin form, with a clear experimental design that isolates polar and structural mismatch effects by comparing STO and NGO substrates. The diffraction data appear carefully measured, and the observation of three octahedral rotational domains in NNMO/STO is an interesting structural result. The COBRA layer-resolved c_pc profiles, if properly quantified, would be a useful contribution. However, the strength of the paper's central conclusion linking structural alterations to orbital symmetry is limited by the qualitative XLD decomposition and the absence of error bars on the COBRA-derived lattice parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [Orbital symmetry from X-ray linear dichroism] The assignment of the positive Mn XLD in 10 and 20 uc NNMO/STO films to interfacial Mn3+ is not supported by a quantitative analysis of total-electron-yield (TEY) depth weighting. With the effective TEY probing depth of 9-10 nm stated in the Methods, the surface Mn2+ layer contributes exponentially more than the interfacial Mn3+ region; for a 20 uc film (~8 nm), the interface is attenuated by a factor of roughly exp(-(6-7)/lambda) relative to the surface, where lambda is the TEY escape depth (typically 2-5 nm). The authors state that 'bulk Mn4+ states would lack any XLD contribution' and 'affirm this positive XLD contribution to the Mn3+ species,' but no per-ion XLD magnitudes or depth profiles are provided. Consequently, the observed sign reversal (negative at 5 uc, positive at 10/20 uc) is not uniquely explained by the proposed competition between surface and interface effects. A quantitative forward model incorporating TEY depth weighting, oxidation-state depth profiles, and per-ion XLD spectra is required to support the claim that interfacial structural alterations control the Mn orbital symmetry.
  2. [Layer-resolved out of plane lattice constant from 1D COBRA] The central quantitative claim of a significant modification of the out-of-plane lattice parameter c_pc within a few unit cells at the interface and surface is presented without error bars or confidence intervals. The manuscript only states that the refinement converged with R << 1 (Eq. 2), but does not report the R-factor values or any uncertainty analysis (e.g., via Monte Carlo or parameter covariance). Given that the c_pc profile in Fig. 4(c) is derived from inter-NdO distances in the reconstructed electron density, the magnitude and significance of the observed enhancements (especially the 3-4 uc interfacial region and the surface region) must be quantified before the structural-orbital coupling is asserted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'The interface exhibits immeasurable resistance in both cases' should be clarified to 'no measurable conductivity' or 'insulating interface,' as the intended meaning is that no electrical conduction was detected.
  2. [Layer-resolved out of plane lattice constant from 1D COBRA] The correlation between the c_pc enhancement and the Mn oxidation states relies on ref [33]; the authors should briefly summarize the relevant XAS/EELS results from that prior work to make the argument more self-contained.
  3. [Orbital symmetry from X-ray linear dichroism] The normalization procedure for the XAS spectra I_c and I_ab before computing the XLD difference is not described; please specify how the spectra were normalized (e.g., to the edge jump or to the incident beam intensity).
  4. [Determination of global octahedral rotational pattern (ORP) using half-order Bragg rods] In Fig. 3(j) and the accompanying text, the statement that the two ORPs are 'nearly equally populated' is based on visual comparison of peak intensities; a quantitative intensity analysis with error bars would be more convincing.
  5. [Layer-resolved out of plane lattice constant from 1D COBRA] The numerical values of c_pc for the interface, bulk-like, and surface layers should be stated explicitly in the text or in a table, in addition to the plot in Fig. 4(c), to support the quantitative claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the structural and spectroscopic results are independent measurements and the cited prior work supplies independent experimental inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central structural claims come from synchrotron crystal truncation rod measurements refined with 1D COBRA, and the orbital claims come from new XLD measurements. The COBRA-derived layer-resolved out-of-plane lattice parameter is a direct experimental observable, not a quantity fitted to the same data it is used to explain. The attribution of the interfacial lattice expansion to Mn3+ and the surface expansion to Mn2+ rests on ref. [33], which reports independent XAS/EELS/STEM measurements of Mn oxidation states and octahedral tilt behavior. Although ref. [33] shares authors with the present paper, it is externally falsifiable experimental evidence and is not derived from the present paper's fitted parameters. The XLD interpretation is qualitative and may carry model dependence, but that is an interpretive assumption rather than a circular reduction: the positive Mn XLD in 10 and 20 uc NNMO/STO films is assigned to interfacial Mn3+ by combining the measured XLD sign with prior oxidation-state data and known surface effects, not by construction from the COBRA fit. No equation in the paper equates a prediction to an input, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain. Therefore no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on standard crystallographic interpretation of half-order peaks, on empirical ionic radii, on a linear-additivity assumption for XLD contributions, and on the resolving power of the COBRA inversion. No new particles or ad hoc physical entities are introduced. The paper also inherits key inputs from the authors' earlier PRL (ref [33]), which is independent experimental evidence rather than a fitted parameter of this study.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Half-order Bragg peak assignments map to specific octahedral rotation patterns per Glazer notation.
    The interpretation of peaks (odd/2, even/2, odd/2) etc. as signatures of rotations follows refs [50,51], a standard crystallographic approach.
  • domain assumption Shannon ionic radii can be used to predict the sign and magnitude of lattice expansion from Mn valence changes.
    Used to explain c_pc increase from Mn4+ to Mn3+/Mn2+; ionic radii are empirical but standard.
  • domain assumption XLD sign reflects the relative occupancy of d_x2-y2 vs d_3z2-r2 orbitals, and contributions from different layers add linearly.
    Used to decompose XLD into surface vs interface contributions; assumes no non-linear interference.
  • domain assumption The COBRA electron density reconstruction resolves individual atomic planes with sufficient precision to extract layer-resolved interplanar distances.
    The central c_pc profile depends on this resolution; no explicit resolution or error analysis is provided.
  • domain assumption The structural and electronic properties of the films studied here are representative of the NNMO/STO and NNMO/NGO systems, including prior samples from ref [33].
    The interpretation borrows STEM and XAS results from the same group's earlier study on presumably similar films.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interfacial reconstruction effects in insulating double perovskite Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$/SrTiO$_3$ and Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$/NdGaO$_3$ thin films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U652ATBH

@misc{pith2026250620264,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interfacial reconstruction effects in insulating double perovskite Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$/SrTiO$_3$ and Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$/NdGaO$_3$ thin films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U652ATBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20264}
}
abstract

Ferromagnetic insulating (FMI) double perovskite oxides (DPOs) $A_2BB'$O$_6$ with near-room-temperature Curie temperatures are promising candidates for ambient-temperature spintronics applications. To realize their potential, epitaxial stabilization of DPO films and understanding the effect of multiple broken symmetries across the film/substrate interface are crucial. This study investigates ultrathin films of the FMI Nd$_2$NiMnO$_6$ (NNMO) grown on SrTiO$_3$ (STO) and NdGaO$_3$ (NGO) substrates. By comparing growth on these substrates, we examine the influence of polarity and structural symmetry mismatches, which are absent in the NGO system. The interface exhibits immeasurable resistance in both cases. Using synchrotron X-ray diffraction, we show that films have three octahedral rotational domains because of the structural symmetry mismatch with the STO substrate. Furthermore, our coherent Bragg rod analysis of specular X-ray diffraction reveals a significant modification of the out-of-plane lattice parameter within a few unit cells at the film/substrate interface and the surface. This arises from polarity compensation and surface symmetry breaking, respectively. These structural alterations influence the Mn orbital symmetry, a dependence that we further confirm through X-ray linear dichroism measurements. Since the ferromagnetism in insulating DPOs is mediated by orbital-dependent superexchange interactions [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 186402 (2008)], our study provides a framework for understanding the evolution of magnetism in ultrathin geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20264 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic depicting the structural and polarity mismatch between NNMO and STO (left) and, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. XRD about non-specular integral CTRs (1 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Half-order diffraction highlighting the peaks (a) ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electron density profile as a function of the out of plane (Z) position for (a) 20 uc NNMO on NGO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) XAS for in-plane polarized X-ray ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Bhattacharya, A

    N. Bhattacharya, A. Sen, K. Qu, A. Sinha, R. K. Patel, S. Kumar, J. Zhang, P. Mandal, S. C. Joshi, S. K. Ojha,et al., Site-selective polar compensation of mott electrons in a double-perovskite heterointerface, Physical Review Letters134, 176201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Moln ´ar, M. L. Roukes, A. Y . Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A spin-based electronics vision for the future, Science 294, 1488 (2001), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1065389

    doi:10.1126/science.1065389 2001

  3. [2]

    Brataas, B

    A. Brataas, B. van Wees, O. Klein, G. de Loubens, and M. Viret, Spin insulatronics, Physics Reports 885, 1 (2020), spin Insulatronics

    2020

  4. [3]

    Emori and P

    S. Emori and P. Li, Ferrimagnetic insulators for spintronics: Beyond garnets, Journal of Applied Physics129, 020901 (2021), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0033259/20020005/020901 1 5.0033259.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0033259/20020005/020901 2021

  5. [4]

    J. H. Lee, L. Fang, E. Vlahos, X. Ke, Y . W. Jung, L. F. Kourkoutis, J.-W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, T. Heeg, M. Roeckerath,et al., A strong ferroelectric ferromagnet created by means of spin–lattice coupling, Nature466, 954 (2010)

    2010

  6. [5]

    Q. Lu, Z. Liu, Q. Yang, H. Cao, P. Balakrishnan, Q. Wang, L. Cheng, Y . Lu, J.-M. Zuo, H. Zhou, et al., Engineering magnetic anisotropy and emergent multidirectional soft ferromagnetism in ultrathin freestanding lamno3 films, ACS nano16, 7580 (2022)

    2022

  7. [6]

    D. Li, H. Wang, K. Li, B. Zhu, K. Jiang, D. Backes, L. S. Veiga, J. Shi, P. Roy, M. Xiao,et al., Emergent and robust ferromagnetic-insulating state in highly strained ferroelastic LaCoO3 thin films, 15 Nature Communications14, 3638 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    D. Meng, H. Guo, Z. Cui, C. Ma, J. Zhao, J. Lu, H. Xu, Z. Wang, X. Hu, Z. Fu,et al., Strain- induced high-temperature perovskite ferromagnetic insulator, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 2873 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 83 references
  1. [8]

    E.-M. Choi, A. Kursumovic, O. J. Lee, J. E. Kleibeuker, A. Chen, W. Zhang, H. Wang, and J. L. MacManus-Driscoll, Ferroelectric sm-doped bimno3 thin films with ferromagnetic transition temper- ature enhanced to 140 k, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces6, 14836 (2014)

    2014

  2. [9]

    Liu, Y .-L

    J.-Q. Liu, Y .-L. Tang, Y . Cao, Y .-L. Zhu, Y .-J. Wang, N. Liu, T.-T. Shi, M.-J. Zou, Y .-P. Feng, and X.-L. Ma, Robust ferromagnetism in a cubic perovskite oxide with curie temperature above 600 k, Cell Reports Physical Science4(2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    W. Li, B. Zhu, Q. He, A. Y . Borisevich, C. Yun, R. Wu, P. Lu, Z. Qi, Q. Wang, A. Chen,et al., Interface engineered room-temperature ferromagnetic insulating state in ultrathin manganite films, Advanced Science7, 1901606 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    Vasala and M

    S. Vasala and M. Karppinen, A2bbo6 perovskites: A review, Progress in Solid State Chemistry43, 1 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    Saha-Dasgupta, Double perovskites with 3d and 4d/5d transition metals: compounds with promises, Materials Research Express7, 014003 (2020)

    T. Saha-Dasgupta, Double perovskites with 3d and 4d/5d transition metals: compounds with promises, Materials Research Express7, 014003 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    S. Ray, S. Middey, S. Jana, A. Banerjee, P. Sanyal, R. Rawat, L. Gregoratti, and D. Sarma, Origin of the unconventional magnetoresistance in Sr2FeMoO6, Europhysics Letters94, 47007 (2011)

    2011

  7. [14]

    S. Deng, Y . Li, X. Liu, S. Feng, H. Yang, J. Yang, L. Jin, X. Kan, and S. Wang, Observation of griffiths phase and giant magnetocaloric effect in double perovskite oxide RE 2FeCrO6 (RE= Gd, Tb, Dy, Er), Journal of the American Ceramic Society , e20239 (2024)

    2024

  8. [15]

    X. Kang, R. Ishikawa, A. A. Belik, Y . Tsujimoto, M. Arai, S. Kawata, and K. Yamaura, Cd2FeReO6: A high-Tc double perovskite oxide with remarkable tunneling magnetoresistance, Inorganic Chemistry 62, 18474 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Borges, R

    R. Borges, R. Thomas, C. Cullinan, J. Coey, R. Suryanarayanan, L. Ben-Dor, L. Pinsard-Gaudart, and A. Revcolevschi, Magnetic properties of the double perovskites A 2FeMoO6; A= Ca, Sr, Ba, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter11, L445 (1999)

    1999

  10. [17]

    Saha-Dasgupta and K

    T. Saha-Dasgupta and K. Pradhan, Kinetic energy driven two-sublattice double-exchange: a general mechanism of magnetic exchange in transition metal compounds, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 023001 (2024). 16

    2024

  11. [18]

    Halder, A

    A. Halder, A. Ghosh, and T. S. Dasgupta, Machine-learning-assisted prediction of magnetic double perovskites, Physical Review Materials3, 084418 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    Tang and X

    Q. Tang and X. Zhu, Half-metallic double perovskite oxides: recent developments and future perspec- tives, J. Mater. Chem. C10, 15301 (2022)

    2022

  13. [20]

    S. Guo, R. Morrow, J. van den Brink, and O. Janson, Machine learning facilitated by microscopic features for discovery of novel magnetic double perovskites, Journal of Materials Chemistry A12, 6103 (2024)

    2024

  14. [21]

    Zubko, S

    P. Zubko, S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, P. Ghosez, and J.-M. Triscone, Interface physics in complex oxide heterostructures, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.2, 141 (2011)

    2011

  15. [22]

    Ramesh and D

    R. Ramesh and D. G. Schlom, Creating emergent phenomena in oxide superlattices, Nature Reviews Materials4, 257 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    H. Y . Hwang, Y . Iwasa, M. Kawasaki, B. Keimer, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces, Nature materials11, 103 (2012)

    2012

  17. [24]

    Huang, Ariando, X

    Z. Huang, Ariando, X. Renshaw Wang, A. Rusydi, J. Chen, H. Yang, and T. Venkatesan, Interface engineering and emergent phenomena in oxide heterostructures, Advanced materials30, 1802439 (2018)

    2018

  18. [25]

    D. G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, C.-B. Eom, K. M. Rabe, S. K. Streiffer, and J.-M. Triscone, Strain tuning of ferroelectric thin films, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.37, 589 (2007)

    2007

  19. [26]

    D. G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, X. Pan, A. Schmehl, and M. A. Zurbuchen, A thin film approach to engineering functionality into oxides, Journal of the American Ceramic Society91, 2429 (2008)

    2008

  20. [27]

    Chakhalian, J

    J. Chakhalian, J. W. Freeland, A. J. Millis, C. Panagopoulos, and J. M. Rondinelli, Colloquium: Emergent properties in plane view: Strong correlations at oxide interfaces, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1189 (2014)

    2014

  21. [28]

    H. Das, U. V . Waghmare, T. Saha-Dasgupta, and D. D. Sarma, Electronic structure, phonons, and dielectric anomaly in ferromagnetic insulating double pervoskitela 2nimno6, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 186402 (2008)

    2008

  22. [29]

    K. A. M ¨uller and H. Burkard, Srti o 3: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 k, Physical Review B19, 3593 (1979)

    1979

  23. [30]

    S. Pal, S. Jana, S. Govinda, B. Pal, S. Mukherjee, S. Keshavarz, D. Thonig, Y . Kvashnin, M. Pereiro, R. Mathieu, P. Nordblad, J. W. Freeland, O. Eriksson, O. Karis, and D. D. Sarma, Peculiar magnetic states in the double perovskitend 2nimno6, Phys. Rev. B100, 045122 (2019). 17

    2019

  24. [31]

    S. R. Spurgeon, P. V . Sushko, A. Devaraj, Y . Du, T. Droubay, and S. A. Chambers, Onset of phase separation in the double perovskite oxidela 2mnnio6, Phys. Rev. B97, 134110 (2018)

    2018

  25. [32]

    De Luca, J

    G. De Luca, J. Spring, M. Kaviani, S. J ¨ohr, M. Campanini, A. Zakharova, C. Guillemard, J. Herrero- Martin, R. Erni, C. Piamonteze, M. D. Rossell, U. Aschauer, and M. Gibert, Top-layer engineer- ing reshapes charge transfer at polar oxide interfaces, Advanced Materials34, 220...

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    S. J. May, J.-W. Kim, J. M. Rondinelli, E. Karapetrova, N. A. Spaldin, A. Bhattacharya, and P. J. Ryan, Quantifying octahedral rotations in strained perovskite oxide films, Phys. Rev. B82, 014110 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    A. S. Disa, F. J. Walker, and C. H. Ahn, High-resolution crystal truncation rod scattering: Appli- cation to ultrathin layers and buried interfaces, Advanced Materials Interfaces7, 1901772 (2020), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/admi.201901772

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Chakhalian, J

    J. Chakhalian, J. Freeland, H.-U. Habermeier, G. Cristiani, G. Khaliullin, M. Van Veenendaal, and B. Keimer, Orbital reconstruction and covalent bonding at an oxide interface, Science318, 1114 (2007)

    2007

  29. [37]

    Bj ¨orck and G

    M. Bj ¨orck and G. Andersson, Genx: An extensible x-ray reflectivity refinement program utilizing differential evolution, Journal of Applied Crystallography - J APPL CRYST40, 1174 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    C. M. Schlep ¨utz, S. O. Mariager, S. A. Pauli, R. Feidenhans’l, and P. R. Willmott, Angle calculations for a (2+ 3)-type diffractometer: focus on area detectors, Journal of Applied Crystallography44, 73 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    St ¨ohr and H

    J. St ¨ohr and H. C. Siegmann, Magnetism, Solid-State Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg5, 236 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    V . M. Kaganer, Crystal truncation rods in kinematical and dynamical x-ray diffraction theories, Phys. Rev. B75, 245425 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    Y . Yuan, Y . Lu, G. Stone, K. Wang, C. M. Brooks, D. G. Schlom, S. B. Sinnott, H. Zhou, and V . Gopalan, Three-dimensional atomic scale electron density reconstruction of octahedral tilt epitaxy in functional perovskites, Nature Communications9, 5220 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    H. Zhou, R. Pindak, R. Clarke, D. M. Steinberg, and Y . Yacoby, The limits of ultrahigh-resolution x-ray mapping: estimating uncertainties in thin-film and interface structures determined by phase 18 retrieval methods, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics45, 195302 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Stølen, E

    S. Stølen, E. Bakken, and C. E. Mohn, Oxygen-deficient perovskites: linking structure, energetics and ion transport, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics8, 429 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    H. Jeen, W. S. Choi, M. D. Biegalski, C. M. Folkman, I.-C. Tung, D. D. Fong, J. W. Freeland, D. Shin, H. Ohta, M. F. Chisholm, and H. N. Lee, Reversible redox reactions in an epitaxially stabilized srcoox oxygen sponge, Nature Materials12, 1057 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Middey, P

    S. Middey, P. Rivero, D. Meyers, M. Kareev, X. Liu, Y . Cao, J. W. Freeland, S. Barraza-Lopez, and J. Chakhalian, Polarity compensation in ultra-thin films of complex oxides: The case of a perovskite nickelate, Scientific Reports4, 6819 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    T. K. Andersen, S. Cook, G. Wan, H. Hong, L. D. Marks, and D. D. Fong, Layer-by-layer epitaxial growth of defect-engineered strontium cobaltites, ACS applied materials & interfaces10, 5949 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    T. L. Meyer, H. Jeen, X. Gao, J. R. Petrie, M. F. Chisholm, and H. N. Lee, Symmetry-driven atomic rearrangement at a brownmillerite–perovskite interface, Advanced Electronic Materials2, 1500201 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Tsuji, T

    E. Tsuji, T. Motohashi, H. Noda, D. Kowalski, Y . Aoki, H. Tanida, J. Niikura, Y . Koyama, M. Mori, H. Arai, T. Ioroi, N. Fujiwara, Y . Uchimoto, Z. Ogumi, and H. Habazaki, Brownmillerite-type ca2fecoo5 as a practicable oxygen evolution reaction catalyst, ChemSusChem10, 2864 (...

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    J. Kim, X. Yin, K.-C. Tsao, S. Fang, and H. Yang, Ca2mn2o5 as oxygen-deficient perovskite electro- catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction, Journal of the American Chemical Society136, 14646 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    A. M. Glazer, The classification of tilted octahedra in perovskites, Acta Crystallographica Section B 28, 3384 (1972)

    1972

  43. [51]

    A. K. Choquette, C. R. Smith, R. J. Sichel-Tissot, E. J. Moon, M. D. Scafetta, E. Di Gennaro, F. Miletto Granozio, E. Karapetrova, and S. J. May, Octahedral rotation patterns in strainedeufeo 3 and other Pbnm perovskite films: Implications for hybrid improper ferroelectricity,...

    2016

  44. [52]

    Glazer, Simple ways of determining perovskite structures, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crys- tal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography31, 756 (1975)

    A. Glazer, Simple ways of determining perovskite structures, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crys- tal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography31, 756 (1975)

    1975

  45. [53]

    Sclauzero and C

    G. Sclauzero and C. Ederer, Structural and electronic properties of epitaxially strainedlavo 3 from density functional theory and dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B92, 235112 (2015). 19

    2015

  46. [54]

    Brahlek, A

    M. Brahlek, A. K. Choquette, C. R. Smith, R. Engel-Herbert, and S. J. May, Struc- tural refinement of Pbnm-type perovskite films from analysis of half-order diffraction peaks, Journal of Applied Physics121, 045303 (2017), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1...

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    G ¨unter, E

    T. G ¨unter, E. Bousquet, A. David, P. Boullay, P. Ghosez, W. Prellier, and M. Fiebig, Incipient ferroelec- tricity in 2.3% tensile-strained camno 3 films, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics85, 214120 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    I.-C. Tung, P. Balachandran, J. Liu, B. Gray, E. Karapetrova, J. Lee, J. Chakhalian, M. Bedzyk, J. Rondinelli, and J. Freeland, Connecting bulk symmetry and orbital polarization in strained rnio 3 ultrathin films, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics88, 205...

    2013

  49. [57]

    G. A. Ravi, F. Azough, R. Freer, R. J. Cernik, and A. M. T. Bell, High- temperature structural phase transition in Ca 0.7Ti0.7La0.3Al0.3O3: Investigation by syn- chrotron x-ray diffraction, Journal of the American Ceramic Society90, 3947 (2007), https://ceramics.onlinelibrary....

    2007

  50. [58]

    Middey, D

    S. Middey, D. Meyers, M. Kareev, Y . Cao, X. Liu, P. Shafer, J. Freeland, J.-W. Kim, P. Ryan, and J. Chakhalian, Disentangled cooperative orderings in artificial rare-earth nickelates, Physical review letters120, 156801 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Bhattacharya, S

    N. Bhattacharya, S. C. Joshi, R. K. Patel, J. Zhang, A. Saha, P. Mandal, S. K. Ojha, A. Gloskovskii, C. Schlueter, J. W. Freeland,et al., Nanoscale inhomogeneity and epitaxial strain control metallicity in single crystalline thin films of high entropy oxide, Advanced Materials...

    2025

  52. [60]

    Yu and A

    L. Yu and A. Zunger, A polarity-induced defect mechanism for conductivity and magnetism at polar– nonpolar oxide interfaces, Nature communications5, 5118 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    T. C. Kaspar, P. V . Sushko, S. R. Spurgeon, M. E. Bowden, D. J. Keavney, R. B. Comes, S. Saremi, L. Martin, and S. A. Chambers, Electronic structure and band alignment of LaMnO 3/SrTiO3 po- lar/nonpolar heterojunctions, Advanced Materials Interfaces6, 1801428 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    I.-C. Tung, G. Luo, J. H. Lee, S. H. Chang, J. Moyer, H. Hong, M. J. Bedzyk, H. Zhou, D. Mor- gan, D. D. Fong,et al., Polarity-driven oxygen vacancy formation in ultrathin lanio3 films on srtio3, Physical Review Materials1, 053404 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    D. P. Kumah, A. S. Disa, J. H. Ngai, H. Chen, A. Malashevich, J. W. Reiner, S. Ismail-Beigi, F. J. Walker, and C. H. Ahn, Tuning the structure of nickelates to achieve two-dimensional electron con- duction, Adv. Mater26, 1935 (2014). 20

    2014

  56. [64]

    Koohfar, A

    S. Koohfar, A. S. Disa, M. S. J. Marshall, F. J. Walker, C. H. Ahn, and D. P. Kumah, Structural distortions at polar manganite interfaces, Phys. Rev. B96, 024108 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    H. Zhou, Y . Yacoby, V . Y . Butko, G. Logvenov, I. Boˇzovi´c, and R. Pindak, Anomalous expansion of the copper-apical-oxygen distance in superconducting cuprate bilayers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 8103 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Vailionis, H

    A. Vailionis, H. Boschker, Z. Liao, J. Smit, G. Rijnders, M. Huijben, and G. Koster, Symmetry and lattice mismatch induced strain accommodation near and away from correlated perovskite interfaces, Applied physics letters105(2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    Herger, P

    R. Herger, P. Willmott, C. Schlep ¨utz, M. Bj ¨orck, S. Pauli, D. Martoccia, B. Patterson, D. Kumah, R. Clarke, Y . Yacoby,et al., Structure determination of monolayer-by-monolayer grown la 1- x sr x mno 3 thin films and the onset of magnetoresistance, Physical Review B—Conden...

    2008

  60. [68]

    R. D. Shannon, Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides, Acta crystallographica section A: crystal physics, diffraction, theoretical and gen- eral crystallography32, 751 (1976)

    1976

  61. [69]

    Benckiser, M

    E. Benckiser, M. W. Haverkort, S. Br ¨uck, E. Goering, S. Macke, A. Fra ˜n´o, X. Yang, O. K. Ander- sen, G. Cristiani, H.-U. Habermeier,et al., Orbital reflectometry of oxide heterostructures, Nature Materials10, 189 (2011)

    2011

  62. [70]

    Green, V

    R. Green, V . Zabolotnyy, M. Zwiebler, Z. Liao, S. Macke, R. Sutarto, F. He, M. Huijben, G. Rijnders, G. Koster,et al., Intrinsic versus extrinsic orbital and electronic reconstructions at complex oxide interfaces, Physical Review Materials5, 065004 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Pesquera, G

    D. Pesquera, G. Herranz, A. Barla, E. Pellegrin, F. Bondino, E. Magnano, F. S ´anchez, and J. Fontcu- berta, Surface symmetry-breaking and strain effects on orbital occupancy in transition metal perovskite epitaxial films, Nature Communications3, 1189 (2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    Middey, D

    S. Middey, D. Meyers, D. Doennig, M. Kareev, X. Liu, Y . Cao, Z. Yang, J. Shi, L. Gu, P. J. Ryan, R. Pentcheva, J. W. Freeland, and J. Chakhalian, Mott electrons in an artificial graphenelike crystal of rare-earth nickelate, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 056801 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    Mandal, S

    P. Mandal, S. K. Ojha, D. Wang, R. K. Patel, S. Kumar, J. Maity, Z. Zhang, H. Zhou, C. Klewe, P. Shafer, B. Sanyal, and S. Middey, Orthorhombic distortion drives orbital ordering in the antiferro- magnetic3d 1 mott insulatorPrTiO 3, Phys. Rev. B108, 045145 (2023). 21

    2023

  66. [74]

    Pesquera, A

    D. Pesquera, A. Barla, M. Wojcik, E. Jedryka, F. Bondino, E. Magnano, S. Nappini, D. Guti ´errez, G. Radaelli, G. Herranz,et al., Strain-driven orbital and magnetic orders and phase separation in epi- taxial half-doped manganite films for tunneling devices, Physical Review App...

    2016

  67. [75]

    Zenia, G

    H. Zenia, G. Gehring, G. Banach, and W. Temmerman, Electronic and magnetic properties of the (001) surface of hole-doped manganites, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics71, 024416 (2005)

    2005

  68. [76]

    J. Wang, Y . Shin, J. R. Paudel, J. D. Grassi, R. K. Sah, W. Yang, E. Karapetrova, A. Zaidan, V . N. Stro- cov, C. Klewe,et al., Strain-induced anion-site occupancy in perovskite oxyfluoride films, Chemistry of materials33, 1811 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    M. J. Calder ´on, L. Brey, and F. Guinea, Surface electronic structure and magnetic properties of doped manganites, Phys. Rev. B60, 6698 (1999)

    1999

  70. [78]

    Spring, G

    J. Spring, G. De Luca, S. J ¨ohr, J. Herrero-Mart´ın, C. Guillemard, C. Piamonteze, C. M. M. Ros ´ario, H. Hilgenkamp, and M. Gibert, Paramagnetic nd sublattice and thickness-dependent ferromagnetism innd 2nimno6 double perovskite thin films, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 104407 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    X. Liu, S. Middey, Y . Cao, M. Kareev, and J. Chakhalian, Geometrical lattice engineering of complex oxide heterostructures: a designer approach to emergent quantum states, MRS communications6, 133 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    T. Kim, D. Puggioni, Y . Yuan, L. Xie, H. Zhou, N. Campbell, P. Ryan, Y . Choi, J.-W. Kim, J. Patzner, et al., Polar metals by geometric design, Nature533, 68 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    N. A. Hill, Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics?, The journal of physical chemistry B104, 6694 (2000)

    2000

  74. [82]

    C. Tian, D. Su, S. Peng, J. Yan, T. Doert, M. Jansen, Z. Wang, Y . Sun, Y . Shi, and H. L. Feng, Ferromagnetic and ferroelectric5d 1 insulatorBa 5(OsO5)3Cl, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 114402 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    I. V . Solovyev, R. Ono, and S. A. Nikolaev, Ferromagnetic ferroelectricity due to the kugel-khomskii mechanism of orbital ordering assisted by atomic hund’s second rule effects, Phys. Rev. B110, 205116 (2024). 22

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.