Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Can tidal evolution lead to close-in planetary bodies around white dwarfs II: volcanism and transits

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that tidal evolution around white dwarfs can not only drag planetesimals onto close-in orbits, but can melt and keep them volcanically active, so that erupted dust produces the optical transits observed in systems like…

desk verdict Solid qualitative framework for tidal volcanism around white dwarfs; the ejecta-dispersion equations are reusable, but the unconstrained tidal time lag keeps the quantitative claim conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20316 v1 pith:MESW3RBS submitted 2025-06-25 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Yuqi Li , Amy Bonsor , Oliver Shorttle This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords whitedwarfstidalevolutionheatingvolcanismplanetesimalstransitingdebrisWD1145+017exoplanetarycomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

White dwarfs are often polluted by planetary debris, and a few show periodic optical transits whose origin is debated. This paper tries to establish that the transiting dust can come from planetesimals that narrowly avoid tidal disruption and are then melted from the inside by tides. The load-bearing result is that a 100-km rocky body perturbed to a pericentre of about 0.01 AU or less, roughly twice its Roche limit, can be melted and kept volcanically active both on long-period (~100-day) eccentric orbits and on short-period (~10-hour) near-circular orbits. The ejected dust, initially optically thick, would block the white dwarf and produce transits with drift periods, depths, durations, and a 180-degree phase shift broadly matching WD 1145+017. If this is right, tidal evolution becomes a self-contained path from a perturbed planetesimal to both close-in orbiting debris and the observed transit signals.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the constant time-lag (CTL) tidal model, in which a pseudo-synchronously rotating planetesimal's semi-major axis decays as the white dwarf raises a lagging tide in it, and every bit of damped orbital energy is deposited as heat. The paper adds a two-criteria thermal switch: volcanism begins only if the melting timescale is shorter than the cooling timescale, and it is maintained only if tidal power exceeds steady-state conductive heat loss through the solid crust. These criteria are evaluated along the tidal evolution track from high eccentricity to circularisation and yield the critical pericentre values $q_{0,\mathrm{crit}}$ and $q'_{0,\mathrm{crit}}$ around 0.01 AU. The transit side is carried by a conduit-model ejection speed $\sim \sqrt{f_g R T} \approx 100$ m/s and first-order orbit-dispersion equations giving the period drift and inclination spread of the ejecta relative to the planetesimal.

What would settle it

Measure the effective tidal time lag of a partially molten rocky body: if it falls below roughly 1 s at silicate melting temperatures, the paper's Eq. (35) rules out tidally induced melting for any planetesimal outside the Roche limit; alternatively, long-baseline photometry of a 4.5-hour white-dwarf transit that shows no period drift or dust spreading over many orbits would contradict the volcanic-ejecta explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that tidal evolution around a white dwarf can do double duty: it circularises a planetesimal that has been perturbed just outside the Roche limit, and the orbital energy released in that circularisation melts the body and sustains volcanism. Under the constant time-lag tidal model with pseudo-synchronous rotation, the semi-major axis decay rate determines the tidal heating rate, and volcanism is judged by two simple energy criteria: melting must be faster than cooling, and tidal power must exceed the conductive heat loss through the solid crust above the melt. With fiducial parameters this produces a critical initial pericentre $q_{0,\mathrm{crit}} \approx 0.011\,\mathrm{AU}$ for melting and $q'_{0,\mathrm{crit}} \approx 0.014\,\mathrm{AU}$ for maintaining melt, so the volcanically active window is roughly $q_0 \lesssim 0.01\,\mathrm{AU}$, about twice the Roche limit, for radii above about 20 km and time lags above about 1 s. The model then computes volcanic ejection speeds of order 10–1000 m/s and the resulting orbital dispersion of the ejecta, showing that for a 4.5-hour near-circular orbit the period dispersion is less than about 0.1 percent of the period and the inclination less than about 0.003, enough to explain the secondary drift periods, transit depth, duration, and 180-degree phase shift seen in WD 1145+017. It does not reproduce the full 4.5–4.9-hour K2 period spread with a single planetesimal, which the paper reads as evidence for multiple bodies or more energetic processes.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the assumption that the planetesimal's tidal dissipation rate stays fixed while it melts; if melting changes the tide, the active window could shift, and the paper itself shows a time lag below about one second would shut volcanism off entirely.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, a planetesimal nudged to $q_0 \lesssim 0.01$ AU automatically passes through a volcanically active phase before circularising, so tidal evolution alone can supply the dust that makes white-dwarf transits.
  • The model predicts two distinct active habitats: long-period (~100-day) highly eccentric orbits and short-period (~10-hour) near-circular orbits, with an inactive valley in between.
  • For a near-circular body at 4.5 hours, volcanic ejecta at 500 m/s produce period drifts up to about 0.02 hours and inclinations below 0.003, matching the secondary drift periods of WD 1145+017 but not the full 4.5–4.9-hour spread.
  • Tidally induced volcanism should also feed white-dwarf pollution, but at a frequency usually more than ten times lower than tidal disruption, and with a mantle-rich compositional signature.
  • On long-period eccentric orbits, ejecta period dispersion can reach tens of percent, so a single observed transit period need not equal the parent body's orbital period.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same two-criteria energy balance could be applied to larger differentiated bodies, where slower cooling might keep volcanism active to lower eccentricity, although a higher escape speed would make dust release harder.
  • Beyond the paper, a useful test is to measure the tidal response of partially molten silicates: if melting pushes the effective time lag below about 1 s, the paper's own criterion closes the volcanic window entirely.
  • Beyond the paper, the model's tight prediction for near-circular orbits, with ejecta periods clustered within about 0.1 percent of the parent period, could be checked by long-baseline photometry showing either steady period drifts or multiple stable periods around one white dwarf.
  • Beyond the paper, computing the infrared behaviour of the volcanic dust would give a testable discriminator: dust optically thick in the optical but transparent at longer wavelengths should produce wavelength-dependent transit behaviour.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper argues that planetesimals scattered onto white-dwarf-crossing orbits just outside the Roche limit can be melted and kept volcanically active by tidal heating, and that the ejected dust can produce the observed white-dwarf transits. The tidal evolution is modeled with a constant-time-lag (CTL) prescription; volcanism is triggered when the melting timescale is shorter than the cooling timescale and maintained when tidal power exceeds the steady-state conductive heat loss through a shallow magma reservoir. The authors derive analytic scalings for the critical initial pericentre distance q0,crit ≈ 0.01–0.014 AU and for the minimum eccentricity e'_crit down to which activity persists, then compute the orbital period and inclination dispersion of volcanic ejecta around circular and eccentric parent bodies. They compare the model with WD 1145+017, reproducing the secondary drift periods, transit depth, duration, and 180-degree phase shift in a broad sense, while noting that the 4.5–4.9 hr period spread requires either ejection speeds > 10 km/s or multiple bodies. They also estimate that tidally induced volcanism is at most about 10% as frequent as tidal disruption and makes a subdominant but non-negligible contribution to white-dwarf pollution.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a coherent end-to-end path from gravitational perturbation to close-in circularized planetesimals to volcanic dust production and observed transits, linking two previously separate areas: tidal circularization and white-dwarf transit models. The main strengths are the transparent order-of-magnitude energy balance, the explicit analytic scalings that allow the reader to see which parameters matter, the honest and detailed limitation section (Section 4.1), and the concrete, falsifiable predictions, e.g., short-period transits from a single body should show period dispersion below ~0.1% and that volcanism is rarer than tidal disruption by more than an order of magnitude. These features make the paper publishable in principle. The significance is, however, conditional: the quantitative existence and location of the volcanically active window rest on the fiducial value tau = 1000 s and on the assumption that the tidal response is not changed by melting, neither of which is currently constrained for the iron-rich bodies invoked for WD 1145+017.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1 / Table 1 / Eq. 35]
  2. [Section 4.1.1 / Section 2.1]
  3. [Section 3.2 / Section 4.2]
  4. [Section 2.2.1 / Eq. 12 / Appendix F]
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4.1.1]
  2. [Section 2.1 / Equations (2)–(6)]
  3. [Figure 2]
  4. [Section 3.1.1 / Eq. (35)]
  5. [Table 1]
  6. [Section 3.2 / Paragraph after Eq. (16)]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed volcanic window and transit comparison are forward calculations from energy balance, not fits or definitions.

full rationale

The load-bearing quantitative results are derived by equating melting and cooling timescales (Eqs. 10–11) and by equating tidal power to steady-state heat loss (Eqs. 15–16), using literature-based fiducial parameters. The critical initial pericentre distances q0,crit ~ 0.011 AU and q0′,crit ~ 0.014 AU follow from these energy-balance equations, not from fitting to the target transits. The paper explicitly shows that tau <~ 1 s would quench tidally induced melting and volcanism (Eqs. 35–36), which is a parameter-sensitivity statement rather than a circular reduction. Observed systems such as WD 1145+017 are used after the fact in Sections 3.2 and 4.2, and the model comparison is falisifiable: the paper concedes that a single planetesimal cannot reproduce the full 4.5–4.9 hr period spread without multiple bodies. The chosen ejection speed of 500 m/s lies inside the independently motivated 10–1000 m/s volcanism range, and the analytical orbit-dispersion relations are then used to make predictions rather than to invert observed periods. The main self-citations to Li et al. (2025) supply prior tidal-evolution results, Roche-limit estimates, and the near-circular assumption for short-period transiting bodies; these are external prior results with stated assumptions and are not defined in terms of this paper's outputs. Section 4.1.1 openly acknowledges the CTL model's limitations and the rheological changes during melting, but this is an admitted model caveat, not evidence that the derivation is equivalent to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation reduces by construction to the claimed volcanic or transit outcome.

Assumptions & free parameters 15 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on about 15 fiducial numbers and a set of standard but not fully validated modeling choices. The strongest sensitivity is to the constant time lag tau and to the assumption that the tidal response is unchanged by melting. The paper tests single-parameter extremes that would rule out volcanism (tau below about 1 s, R_p below about 20 km, a0 above about 150-200 AU) and finds the fiducial parameter space survives; however, combined parameter changes and rheological feedback are not explored.

free parameters (15)
  • Constant time lag tau = 1000 s
    Fiducial for rocky bodies from literature (Table 1); enters q0,crit as tau^(2/15) and volcanism is ruled out for tau below about 1 s via Eq. 35.
  • Thermal conductivity A = 3 W/(m·K)
    Controls cooling timescale in Eq. 9; melting is ruled out for A above about 2000 W/(m·K) under single-parameter variation.
  • Specific heat capacity c_p = 1000 J/(K·kg)
    Forsterite value used in melting timescale (Eq. 8) and mass loss rate (Eq. 46).
  • Temperature representation of melting energy ΔT_c = 3000 K
    Computed for forsterite including latent heat (Appendix B); affects q0,crit by power 2/15.
  • Critical temperature of melting T_c = 2000 K
    Silicate liquidus; sets heat loss rate in Eq. 12 and q'_0,crit.
  • Nusselt number Nu and Nu' = 1
    Conduction-only limiting case; Nu=10 reduces q0,crit by about 25% (Section 4.1.3).
  • Magma reservoir depth r_m/R_p = 0.9
    Adopted from thermal stress estimates (Appendix F); large uncertainty, q'_0,crit depends on ((1-r_m)/r_m)^(2/15).
  • Volcanic gas mass fraction H_0 = 0.01 to 0.1
    Terrestrial volcanism range (Woods & Bower 1995); sets ejection speed of order 100 m/s.
  • Ejection speed v_eject = 10 to 1000 m/s
    Chosen to match Io and conduit-model bounds; controls orbit dispersion, period drift, and transit depth.
  • Mean molecular weight of volcanic gas mu = 10
    Typical rocky volcanic gas (Table 1); used in the ejection speed formula.
  • Tensile strength sigma+ = 0.1 MPa rocky; >100 MPa iron
    Sets Roche limit (Eq. 7); determines whether a body can circularize to 4.5 hr without disruption.
  • Bulk density rho_p = 3000 kg/m3 rocky, 6000 kg/m3 iron
    Affects Roche limit, tidal response (B_p proportional to R_p^2/rho_p), and mass loss rate; 6000 used for the WD 1145+017 application.
  • Initial apocentre a_0 = 3 AU
    Assumed source region distance; q0,crit depends weakly on a0 as a0^(-1/5).
  • White dwarf cooling age at start t_0 = 100 Myr
    Sets luminosity via Mestel relation (Eq. 14), affecting surface temperature and melt maintenance.
  • White dwarf mass M* = 0.6 Msun
    Peak of observed WD mass distribution; q0,crit scales as M*^(2/5).
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Constant time lag (CTL) tidal model with pseudo-synchronization, spin-orbit alignment, and angular momentum conservation (Eqs. 2-5).
    Provides the heating rate and orbital decay law throughout the paper; standard equilibrium-tide framework from Hut (1981). Invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Orbital energy dissipated by tides is fully converted into internal heat of the planetesimal; rotational energy changes are neglected (Eq. 1).
    Justified by the authors as orders of magnitude smaller, but it is an input to the energy balance.
  • domain assumption Cooling of the melted body is by steady-state conduction through a solid crust with Nu = Nu' = 1 (Eqs. 9 and 12).
    The paper argues a solid mantle is preserved and treats convection up to Nu about 10 in Appendix C as a perturbation.
  • domain assumption The planetesimal remains spherical and rigid, with Roche limit given by Eq. 7.
    Non-spherical shape and scale-dependent strength would shrink the allowed q0 space (Section 4.1.4).
  • ad hoc to paper A shallow magma reservoir at r_m = 0.9 Rp is required for volcanism, with conduction above it.
    The reservoir depth is a model construct estimated from thermal stress and viscoelastic dissipation (Appendix F), with order-unity uncertainty; the fiducial value is adopted when needed.
  • domain assumption After ejection, dust orbits under the white dwarf's gravity only; the planetesimal's gravity, radiation pressure, PR drag, and magnetic forces are neglected for the initial orbit (Section 2.3).
    Used to derive Eqs. 20-34; the paper partially checks the planetesimal's gravity with Rebound in Appendix M and discusses PR drag in Section 4.1.5.
  • standard math Mestel white dwarf cooling relation for luminosity (Eq. 14).
    Standard cooling model; used to set surface equilibrium temperatures.
  • domain assumption Power-law size and pericentre distributions with slopes gamma = -4 and alpha = 1 for the population synthesis (Section 4.2.3).
    Adopted from Dohnanyi-like size distributions and an arbitrary choice for alpha; these assumptions determine the volcanism-to-disruption frequency ratio.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can tidal evolution lead to close-in planetary bodies around white dwarfs II: volcanism and transits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MESW3RBS

@misc{pith2026250620316,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can tidal evolution lead to close-in planetary bodies around white dwarfs II: volcanism and transits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MESW3RBS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20316}
}
abstract

Planetary material accreted by white dwarfs provides unique insights regarding exoplanetary composition. The evolutionary pathways of planetary bodies around white dwarfs are crucial to understanding the presence of close-in planetary material, observed in the form of pollutants in the atmospheres of white dwarfs and planetary material transiting white dwarfs. Periodic transits around white dwarfs potentially reveal the existence of close-in planetary bodies undergoing dust production. Tidal interactions can bring planetesimals that have been gravitationally perturbed onto long-period highly eccentric orbits around white dwarfs towards shorter orbital periods and smaller eccentricities. Tidal interactions may also induce melting and volcanism in these planetesimals, potentially being a mechanism for dust and debris production, the result of which may be seen in transit. Tidally induced volcanism may be triggered in a wide parameter space: for a 100km-sized rocky planetesimals perturbed to a pericentre distance $\lesssim$ 0.01AU ($\gtrsim$ twice its Roche limit), both on long-period (~ 100day) highly eccentric orbits and short-period (~ 10hr) near circular orbits. We comment on the potential link between the resultant volcanic ejecta and observed optical transits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20316 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The coordinate system used to solve for the final orbit of the ejecta. The sketch is not to scale. deviates from the planetesimal’s orbit. We also neglect the back re￾action of volcanic ejection on the planetesimal’s orbit (see Appendix I). 2.3.1 Computations of orbital parameters of the ejecta First, based on the variation of specific energy, we compute the variation of orbital semi-major axis/period of the ejecta … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The contour plot of the ratio of tidal power to steady state heat loss rate (upper-left panel), orbital period (upper-right panel), and a highlight of which planetesimal (ħ0) and when (Ī, ě) are volcanically active (lower panel). The dashdotdotted, dashed and dashdot lines are the melting timescale, cooling timescale and the critical initial pericentre distance of melting. The dotted contour lines are the orbital ec… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The critical eccentricity (ě ′ crit) below which volcanism cannot be maintained computed numerically (using Eq.6 and Eq.12, solid line, left axis) together with the time-averaged equilibrium temperature at ě = ě ′ crit (dotted line, right axis), and the analytical upper bound of ě = ě ′ crit (Eq.16, dashed line, left axis). The free parameters are identical to those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The orbital period (left panel) and orbital inclination (right panel) of the volcanic ejecta with ejection speed 500 m/s launched at different positions of the planetesimal surface relative to the 4.5 hr orbital period of the planetesimal on a (near) circular orbit aro…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The maximum orbital period dispersion (ăextreme, left panel) and the extent perpendicular to the orbital plane/along the z axis (İextreme right panel) from the planetesimal on a 4.5 hr (near) circular orbit around a 0.6 ĉ» white dwarf for different ejection speeds and …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The orbit dispersion (upper panel: period, lower panel: inclina￾tion) relative to the planetesimal around ZTF J0139+5245 (left panel) and WD 1054-226 (right panel), respectively, as a function of true anomaly for four sets of ejection angles. The ejection speed is assu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The simulated distribution for the frequency (x-axis) and accreted mass (y-axis) ratio of tidally induced volcanism relative to tidal disruption for Ă = 1 and ÿ = −4 and 5000 systems (each system contains 200000 sample planetesimals). Middle panel: 2D density map in fr…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bounding destruction timescales of minor planets orbiting white dwarfs with the sesquinary catastrophe

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Minor planets orbiting white dwarfs at 1-4 Roche radii can be destroyed by their own returning impact ejecta on timescales of 10^2 to 10^5 years.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

184 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [5]

    2010, Geophysical Journal International, 182, 843, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04674.x

    Bercovici , D., & Michaut , C. 2010, Geophysical Journal International, 182, 843, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04674.x

    arXiv 2010

  4. [7]

    A., Andrault , D., Fiquet , G., & Richet , P

    Bouhifd , M. A., Andrault , D., Fiquet , G., & Richet , P. 1996, , 23, 1143, 10.1029/96GL01118

    work page doi:10.1029/96gl01118 1996

  5. [8]

    Byerlee, J. D. 1978, pure and applied geophysics, 116, 615. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:128666327

    1978

  6. [9]

    C., Martin , R

    Childs , A. C., Martin , R. G., Nixon , C. J., et al. 2024, , 962, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a11

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a11 2024

  7. [11]

    1985, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 73, 407, 10.1016/0012-821X(85)90088-3

    Fukuyama , H. 1985, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 73, 407, 10.1016/0012-821X(85)90088-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0012-821x(85)90088-3 1985

  8. [12]

    1972, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 9, 213, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(72)90024-1

    Geller, L. 1972, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 9, 213, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(72)90024-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0148-9062(72)90024-1 1972

Show all 184 references
  1. [13]

    2007, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.011

    Gercek, H. 2007, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.011

    2007 doi

  2. [14]

    1991, Journal of Geophysical Research, 961, 11805, 10.1029/91JB00680

    Gillet, P., Richet, P., Guyot, F., & Fiquet, G. 1991, Journal of Geophysical Research, 961, 11805, 10.1029/91JB00680

    1991 doi

  3. [16]

    M., & Manga, M

    Gonnermann, H. M., & Manga, M. 2013, Dynamics of magma ascent in the volcanic conduit (Cambridge University Press), 55–84

    2013

  4. [17]

    2019, Minerals, 9, 10.3390/min9120787

    Gouriet, K., Carrez, P., & Cordier, P. 2019, Minerals, 9, 10.3390/min9120787

    2019 doi

  5. [20]

    1981, , 99, 126

    Hut , P. 1981, , 99, 126

    1981

  6. [22]

    J., & Bromley , B

    Kenyon , S. J., & Bromley , B. C. 2017, , 844, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7b85

    2017 doi

  7. [23]

    2005, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 143, 29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.09.009

    Koyaguchi, T. 2005, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 143, 29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.09.009

    2005 doi

  8. [24]

    2022, Communications Earth & Environment, 10.1038/s43247-022-00479-6

    La Spina , G., Arzilli, F., Burton, M., Polacci, M., & Clarke, A. 2022, Communications Earth & Environment, 10.1038/s43247-022-00479-6

    2022 doi

  9. [25]

    2013, in EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU2013--4653

    Lebrun , T., Massol , H., Chassefiere , E., et al. 2013, in EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU2013--4653

    2013

  10. [27]

    M., & Stewart , S

    Leinhardt , Z. M., & Stewart , S. T. 2012, , 745, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/79

    2012 doi

  11. [31]

    V., Kirchschlager , F., Sende , J

    L \"o hne , T., Krivov , A. V., Kirchschlager , F., Sende , J. A., & Wolf , S. 2017, , 605, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630297

    2017 doi

  12. [34]

    2014, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 115, 1057, 10.1007/s10973-013-3427-2

    Miao, S., Li, H., & Chen, G. 2014, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 115, 1057, 10.1007/s10973-013-3427-2

    2014 doi

  13. [36]

    2008, , 389, 191, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13512.x

    P \'a l , A., & Kocsis , B. 2008, , 389, 191, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13512.x

    2008

  14. [39]

    C., Solomatov , V

    Reese , C. C., Solomatov , V. S., & Baumgardner , J. R. 2005, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 149, 361, 10.1016/j.pepi.2004.11.004

    2005 doi

  15. [40]

    C., Solomatov , V

    Reese , C. C., Solomatov , V. S., Baumgardner , J. R., & Yang , W. S. 1999, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 116, 1, 10.1016/S0031-9201(99)00115-6

    1999 doi

  16. [45]

    I., & Serebryanskiy, A

    Shestakova, L. I., & Serebryanskiy, A. V. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 4506, 10.1093/mnras/stad2006

    2023 doi

  17. [46]

    Slyuta , E. N. 2017, Solar System Research, 51, 64, 10.1134/S0038094617010051

    2017 doi

  18. [47]

    2007, in Treatise on Geophysics, ed

    Solomatov, V. 2007, in Treatise on Geophysics, ed. G. Schubert (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 91--119, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452748-6.00141-3

    2007 doi

  19. [48]

    T., & Leinhardt , Z

    Stewart , S. T., & Leinhardt , Z. M. 2009, , 691, L133, 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/L133

    2009 doi

  20. [49]

    1999, Planetary and Space Science, 47, 319, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(98)00143-3

    Tambovtseva, L., & Shestakova, L. 1999, Planetary and Space Science, 47, 319, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(98)00143-3

    1999 doi

  21. [50]

    M., Sort , J., et al

    Tanbakouei , S., Trigo-Rodr \' guez , J. M., Sort , J., et al. 2019, , 629, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935380

    2019 doi

  22. [51]

    2023, Engineering Geology, 321, 107154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107154

    Tang, X., Xu, J., Zhang, Y., et al. 2023, Engineering Geology, 321, 107154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107154

    2023

  23. [52]

    2014, Faulting (Cambridge University Press), 386–424

    Turcotte, D., & Schubert, G. 2014, Faulting (Cambridge University Press), 386–424

    2014

  24. [54]

    Wilson , L., Sparks , R. S. J., & Walker , G. P. L. 1980, Geophysical Journal, 63, 117, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1980.tb02613.x

    1980 doi

  25. [58]

    2022, Symmetry, 15, 39, 10.3390/sym15010039

    Yahalom , A. 2022, Symmetry, 15, 39, 10.3390/sym15010039

    2022 doi

  26. [60]

    Abrahams J. N. H., Nimmo F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1029/2019GL082542 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019GeoRL..46.5055A 46, 5055

    2019 doi

  27. [61]

    A., Emery J

    Ahles A. A., Emery J. D., Dunand D. C., 2021, @doi [Acta Astronautica] 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.09.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AcAau.189..465A 189, 465

    2021 doi

  28. [62]

    J., Palle E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628511 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...589L...6A 589, L6

    Alonso R., Rappaport S., Deeg H. J., Palle E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628511 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...589L...6A 589, L6

    2016 doi

  29. [63]

    Bagheri A., et al., 2022, @doi [Advances in Geophysics] 10.1016/bs.agph.2022.07.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AdGeo..63..231B 63, 231

    2022 doi

  30. [64]

    Barnes R., 2017, @doi [Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy] 10.1007/s10569-017-9783-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017CeMDA.129..509B 129, 509

    2017 doi

  31. [65]

    Beaug \'e C., Nesvorn \'y D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751..119B 751, 119

    2012 doi

  32. [66]

    E., Farihi J., Jura M., Song I., Weinberger A

    Becklin E. E., Farihi J., Jura M., Song I., Weinberger A. J., Zuckerman B., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497826 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632L.119B 632, L119

    2005 doi

  33. [67]

    Beuthe M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.11.020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Icar..223..308B 223, 308

    2013 doi

  34. [68]

    V., Rafikov R

    Bochkarev K. V., Rafikov R. R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...36B 741, 36

    2011 doi

  35. [69]

    N., Leconte J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...535A..94B 535, A94

    Bolmont E., Raymond S. N., Leconte J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...535A..94B 535, A94

    2011 doi

  36. [70]

    O., Blanco-Cuaresma S., Agol E., Grimm S

    Bolmont E., Demory B. O., Blanco-Cuaresma S., Agol E., Grimm S. L., Auclair-Desrotour P., Selsis F., Leleu A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037546 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.117B 635, A117

    2020 doi

  37. [71]

    C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20156.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.2990B 420, 2990

    Bonsor A., Wyatt M. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20156.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.2990B 420, 2990

    2012

  38. [72]

    C., Th \'e bault P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A.104B 548, A104

    Bonsor A., Augereau J. C., Th \'e bault P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A.104B 548, A104

    2012 doi

  39. [73]

    C., van Lieshout R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468..154B 468, 154

    Bonsor A., Farihi J., Wyatt M. C., van Lieshout R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468..154B 468, 154

    2017 doi

  40. [74]

    Bou \'e G., Efroimsky M., 2019, @doi [Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy] 10.1007/s10569-019-9908-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019CeMDA.131...30B 131, 30

    2019 doi

  41. [75]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587798 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679.1566B 679, 1566

    Burke C. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587798 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679.1566B 679, 1566

    2008 doi

  42. [76]

    K., von Löwis S., Pfeffer M

    Butwin M. K., von Löwis S., Pfeffer M. A., Thorsteinsson T., 2019, @doi [Journal of Aerosol Science] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.12.004 , 128, 99

    2019 doi

  43. [77]

    Clausen N., Tilgner A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...584A..60C 584, A60

    2015 doi

  44. [78]

    Colucci S., de' Michieli Vitturi M., Neri A., Palladino D., 2014, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.07.034 , 404, 98

    2014 doi

  45. [79]

    Croll B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...82C 836, 82

    2017 doi

  46. [80]

    Davidsson B. J. R., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1999.6214 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Icar..142..525D 142, 525

    1999

  47. [81]

    G., Perry J

    Davies A. G., Perry J. E., Williams D. A., Nelson D. M., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-02123-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8...94D 8, 94

    2024 doi

  48. [82]

    Dobretsov N., 2015, @doi [Russian Geology and Geophysics] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.11.001 , 56, 1663

    2015 doi

  49. [83]

    S., 1969, @doi [ ] 10.1029/JB074i010p02531 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969JGR....74.2531D 74, 2531

    Dohnanyi J. S., 1969, @doi [ ] 10.1029/JB074i010p02531 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969JGR....74.2531D 74, 2531

    1969 doi

  50. [84]

    Dong J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2600 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920L..16D 920, L16

    2021 doi

  51. [85]

    M., Redfield S., Veras D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...893..166D 893, 166

    Duvvuri G. M., Redfield S., Veras D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...893..166D 893, 166

    2020 doi

  52. [86]

    Farhat M., Auclair-Desrotour P., Bou \'e G., Lichtenberg T., Laskar J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b93 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..133F 979, 133

    2025 doi

  53. [87]

    Farihi J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2016.03.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NewAR..71....9F 71, 9

    2016 doi

  54. [88]

    Farihi J., Jura M., Zuckerman B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...694..805F 694, 805

    2009 doi

  55. [89]

    E., Zuckerman B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1386 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714.1386F 714, 1386

    Farihi J., Jura M., Lee J. E., Zuckerman B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1386 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714.1386F 714, 1386

    2010 doi

  56. [90]

    Farihi J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.1647F 511, 1647

    2022 doi

  57. [91]

    Fellay L., Pezzotti C., Buldgen G., Eggenberger P., Bolmont E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A...2F 669, A2

    2023 doi

  58. [92]

    T., Marsh T

    G \"a nsicke B. T., Marsh T. R., Southworth J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00343.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.380L..35G 380, L35

    2007

  59. [93]

    T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L...7G 818, L7

    G \"a nsicke B. T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L...7G 818, L7

    2016 doi

  60. [94]

    L., Rappaport S., Kaye T

    Gary B. L., Rappaport S., Kaye T. G., Alonso R., Hambschs F. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2921 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3267G 465, 3267

    2017 doi

  61. [95]

    H., \"O zel F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...74G 754, 74

    G \'a sp \'a r A., Psaltis D., Rieke G. H., \"O zel F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...74G 754, 74

    2012 doi

  62. [96]

    E., McEwen A

    Geissler P. E., McEwen A. S., Ip W., Belton M. J. S., Johnson T. V., Smyth W. H., Ingersoll A. P., 1999, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.285.5429.870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Sci...285..870G 285, 870

    1999 doi

  63. [97]

    B., Grishin E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6807 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...11G 931, 11

    Glanz H., Rozner M., Perets H. B., Grishin E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6807 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...11G 931, 11

    2022 doi

  64. [98]

    A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abee68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912..125G 912, 125

    Guidry J. A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abee68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912..125G 912, 125

    2021 doi

  65. [99]

    Hansen B. M. S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757....6H 757, 6

    2012 doi

  66. [100]

    Heller R., Leconte J., Barnes R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015809 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...528A..27H 528, A27

    2011 doi

  67. [101]

    Hut P., 1981, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981A&A....99..126H 99, 126

    1981

  68. [102]

    S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..751I 713, 751

    Ibgui L., Burrows A., Spiegel D. S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..751I 713, 751

    2010 doi

  69. [103]

    Johansen A., Ronnet T., Schiller M., Deng Z., Bizzarro M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A..74J 671, A74

    2023 doi

  70. [104]

    C., Sori M

    Johnson B. C., Sori M. M., Evans A. J., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-019-0885-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4...41J 4, 41

    2020 doi

  71. [105]

    Jura M., Farihi J., Zuckerman B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518767 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663.1285J 663, 1285

    2007 doi

  72. [106]

    Jura M., Farihi J., Zuckerman B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.3191J 137, 3191

    2009 doi

  73. [107]

    Kawahara H., Hirano T., Kurosaki K., Ito Y., Ikoma M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/776/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...776L...6K 776, L6

    2013 doi

  74. [108]

    O., Kleinman S

    Kepler S. O., Kleinman S. J., Nitta A., Koester D., Castanheira B. G., Giovannini O., Costa A. F. M., Althaus L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11388.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.375.1315K 375, 1315

    2007

  75. [109]

    O., Koester D., Romero A

    Kepler S. O., Koester D., Romero A. D., Ourique G., Pelisoli I., 2017, in Tremblay P. E., Gaensicke B., Marsh T., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 509, 20th European White Dwarf Workshop. p. 421 ( @eprint arXiv 1610.00371 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1...

    2017 doi arXiv

  76. [110]

    Kervazo M., Tobie G., Choblet G., Dumoulin C., B e hounkov \'a M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Icar..37314737K 373, 114737

    2022

  77. [111]

    K., Winget D

    Kilic M., von Hippel T., Leggett S. K., Winget D. E., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497825 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632L.115K 632, L115

    2005 doi

  78. [112]

    K., Winget D

    Kilic M., von Hippel T., Leggett S. K., Winget D. E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..474K 646, 474

    2006 doi

  79. [113]

    T., Farihi J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...566A..34K 566, A34

    Koester D., G \"a nsicke B. T., Farihi J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...566A..34K 566, A34

    2014 doi

  80. [114]

    Lai S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920..156L 920, 156

    2021 doi

  81. [115]

    Lambeck K., 1977, @doi [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rsta.1977.0159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977RSPTA.287..545L 287, 545

    1977

  82. [116]

    Leconte J., Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Levrard B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...516A..64L 516, A64

    2010 doi

  83. [117]

    E., Spera F

    Lesher C. E., Spera F. J., 2015, in Sigurdsson H., ed., , The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (Second Edition), second edition edn, Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 113--141, @doi https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385938-9.00005-5 , https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B97...

    2015 doi

  84. [118]

    Levrard B., Correia A. C. M., Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Selsis F., Laskar J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066487 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...462L...5L 462, L5

    2007 doi

  85. [119]

    K., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf182 , 537, 2214

    Li Y., Bonsor A., Shorttle O., Rogers L. K., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf182 , 537, 2214

    2025 doi

  86. [120]

    J., Hands T

    Lichtenberg T., Dr a \.z kowska J., Sch \"o nb \"a chler M., Golabek G. J., Hands T. O., 2021, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.abb3091 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Sci...371..365L 371, 365

    2021 doi

  87. [121]

    B., Shorttle O., 2023, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2022JE007528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JGRE..12807528L 128, e2022JE007528

    Liggins P., Jordan S., Rimmer P. B., Shorttle O., 2023, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2022JE007528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JGRE..12807528L 128, e2022JE007528

    2023 doi

  88. [122]

    M., Williams D

    Lopes R. M., Williams D. A., 2015, in Sigurdsson H., ed., , The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (Second Edition), second edition edn, Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 747--762, @doi https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385938-9.00043-2 , https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B...

    2015 doi

  89. [123]

    C., Laughlin G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc06d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948...41L 948, 41

    Lu T., Rein H., Tamayo D., Hadden S., Mardling R., Millholland S. C., Laughlin G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc06d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948...41L 948, 41

    2023 doi

  90. [124]

    Macedonio G., Neri A., Martì J., Folch A., 2005, @doi [Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.09.015 , 143, 153

    2005 doi

  91. [125]

    V., Efroimsky M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764...27M 764, 27

    Makarov V. V., Efroimsky M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764...27M 764, 27

    2013 doi

  92. [126]

    Malamud U., Grishin E., Brouwers M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.3806M 501, 3806

    2021 doi

  93. [127]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531L..27M 531, L27

    Manser C. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531L..27M 531, L27

    2024 doi

  94. [128]

    J., Rasio F

    Matsumura S., Peale S. J., Rasio F. A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1995 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725.1995M 725, 1995

    2010 doi

  95. [129]

    S., Soderblom L

    McEwen A. S., Soderblom L. A., 1983, @doi [Icarus] https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(83)90075-1 , 55, 191

    1983 doi

  96. [130]

    S., et al., 1998, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.281.5373.87 , 281, 87

    McEwen A. S., et al., 1998, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.281.5373.87 , 281, 87

    1998 doi

  97. [131]

    Melis C., Jura M., Albert L., Klein B., Zuckerman B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722.1078M 722, 1078

    2010 doi

  98. [132]

    Mestel L., 1952, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/112.6.583 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1952MNRAS.112..583M 112, 583

    1952 doi

  99. [133]

    D., Rafikov R

    Metzger B. D., Rafikov R. R., Bochkarev K. V., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20895.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..505M 423, 505

    2012

  100. [134]

    J., Jackson B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702.1413M 702, 1413

    Miller N., Fortney J. J., Jackson B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702.1413M 702, 1413

    2009 doi

  101. [135]

    M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854...44M 854, 44

    Moe M., Kratter K. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854...44M 854, 44

    2018 doi

  102. [136]

    E., Moskovitz N., Delbo' M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..139M 156, 139

    Mommert M., McNeill A., Trilling D. E., Moskovitz N., Delbo' M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..139M 156, 139

    2018 doi

  103. [137]

    J., Villaver E., Veras D., G \"a nsicke B

    Mustill A. J., Villaver E., Veras D., G \"a nsicke B. T., Bonsor A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.3939M 476, 3939

    2018 doi

  104. [138]

    Neron de Surgy O., Laskar J., 1997, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...318..975N 318, 975

    1997

  105. [139]

    V., Efroimsky M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.045 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Icar..241...26N 241, 26

    Noyelles B., Frouard J., Makarov V. V., Efroimsky M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.045 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Icar..241...26N 241, 26

    2014 doi

  106. [140]

    S., Consolmagno G

    Noyes C. S., Consolmagno G. J., Macke R. J., Britt D. T., Opeil C. P., 2022, @doi [Meteoritics & Planetary Science] https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13895 , 57, 1706

    2022 doi

  107. [141]

    W., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.3055O 518, 3055

    O'Brien M. W., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.3055O 518, 3055

    2023 doi

  108. [142]

    W., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.8687O 527, 8687

    O'Brien M. W., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.8687O 527, 8687

    2024 doi

  109. [143]

    E., Lai D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.4005O 498, 4005

    O'Connor C. E., Lai D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.4005O 498, 4005

    2020 doi

  110. [144]

    E., Teyssandier J., Lai D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.4178O 513, 4178

    O'Connor C. E., Teyssandier J., Lai D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.4178O 513, 4178

    2022 doi

  111. [145]

    Opeil C., Consolmagno G., Britt D., 2010, @doi [Icarus] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.021 , 208, 449

    2010 doi

  112. [146]

    Osman S., Beckett F., Rust A., Snee E., 2020, @doi [Atmosphere] 10.3390/atmos11060567 , 11

    2020 doi

  113. [147]

    Ostrowski D., Bryson K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.pss.2018.11.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019P&SS..165..148O 165, 148

    2019 doi

  114. [148]

    E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747..113P 747, 113

    Pan M., Schlichting H. E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747..113P 747, 113

    2012 doi

  115. [149]

    Park R., et al., 2025, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-024-08442-5 , 638, 69

    2025 doi

  116. [150]

    T., 2020, @doi [Meteoritics & Planetary Science] https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13449 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020M&PS...55..962P 55, 962

    Pohl L., Britt D. T., 2020, @doi [Meteoritics & Planetary Science] https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13449 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020M&PS...55..962P 55, 962

    2020 doi

  117. [151]

    H., Teukolsky S

    Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...213..183P 213, 183

    1977 doi

  118. [152]

    Quirrenbach A., 2022, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ac5f0d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022RNAAS...6...56Q 6, 56

    2022 doi

  119. [153]

    R., 2011a, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01096.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416L..55R 416, L55

    Rafikov R. R., 2011a, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01096.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416L..55R 416, L55

    2011

  120. [154]

    R., 2011b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/732/1/L3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...732L...3R 732, L3

    Rafikov R. R., 2011b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/732/1/L3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...732L...3R 732, L3

    doi

  121. [155]

    Rappaport S., Barclay T., DeVore J., Rowe J., Sanchis-Ojeda R., Still M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784...40R 784, 40

    2014 doi

  122. [156]

    L., Kaye T., Vanderburg A., Croll B., Benni P., Foote J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3904R 458, 3904

    Rappaport S., Gary B. L., Kaye T., Vanderburg A., Croll B., Benni P., Foote J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3904R 458, 3904

    2016 doi

  123. [157]

    A., Spencer J

    Rathbun J. A., Spencer J. R., Davies A. G., Howell R. R., Wilson L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1029/2002GL014747 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002GeoRL..29.1443R 29, 1443

    2002 doi

  124. [158]

    A., Lopes R

    Rathbun J. A., Lopes R. M. C., Spencer J. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aae370 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..207R 156, 207

    2018 doi

  125. [159]

    F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...537A.128R 537, A128

    Rein H., Liu S. F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...537A.128R 537, A128

    2012 doi

  126. [160]

    Renggli C., King P., Henley R., Norman M., 2017, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.03.012 , 206, 296

    2017 doi

  127. [161]

    Ricard Y., S r \'a mek O., Dubuffet F., 2009, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.04.021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009E&PSL.284..144R 284, 144

    2009 doi

  128. [162]

    Rodet L., Lai D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.11664 527, 11664

    2024 doi

  129. [163]

    K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.6038R 527, 6038

    Rogers L. K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.6038R 527, 6038

    2024 doi

  130. [164]

    B., Grishin E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...10R 931, 10

    Rozner M., Glanz H., Perets H. B., Grishin E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...10R 931, 10

    2022 doi

  131. [165]

    M., 2020, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2019JE006312 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JGRE..12506312R 125, e06312

    Rufu R., Canup R. M., 2020, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2019JE006312 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JGRE..12506312R 125, e06312

    2020 doi

  132. [166]

    B., de El \' a G

    S \'a nchez M. B., de El \' a G. C., Downes J. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937317 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..78S 637, A78

    2020 doi

  133. [167]

    Sanchis-Ojeda R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...812..112S 812, 112

    2015 doi

  134. [168]

    R., Elkins-Tanton L

    Scheinberg A., Fu R. R., Elkins-Tanton L. T., Weiss B. P., 2015, in Michel P., DeMeo F. E., Bottke W. F., eds, , Asteroids IV. University of Arizona Press, pp 533--552, @doi 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816532131-ch028

    2015 doi

  135. [169]

    Z., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...22S 961, 22

    Seligman D. Z., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...22S 961, 22

    2024 doi

  136. [170]

    B., Armitage P

    Simon J. B., Armitage P. J., Li R., Youdin A. N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822...55S 822, 55

    2016 doi

  137. [171]

    B., Armitage P

    Simon J. B., Armitage P. J., Youdin A. N., Li R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8c79 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847L..12S 847, L12

    2017 doi

  138. [172]

    R., et al., 2007, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1147621 , 318, 240

    Spencer J. R., et al., 2007, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1147621 , 318, 240

    2007 doi

  139. [173]

    Steinberg G., Babenko J., 1978, @doi [Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research] https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(78)90005-7 , 3, 89

    1978 doi

  140. [174]

    I., Lai D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.1526S 438, 1526

    Storch N. I., Lai D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.1526S 438, 1526

    2014 doi

  141. [175]

    Taddeucci J., et al., 2021, @doi [Geophysical Research Letters] https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092899 , 48, e2021GL092899

    2021 doi

  142. [176]

    D., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430494 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...627.1011T 627, 1011

    Tingley B., Sackett P. D., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430494 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...627.1011T 627, 1011

    2005 doi

  143. [177]

    Tobie G., Mocquet A., Sotin C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.04.006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Icar..177..534T 177, 534

    2005 doi

  144. [178]

    E., Cummings J., Kalirai J

    Tremblay P. E., Cummings J., Kalirai J. S., G \"a nsicke B. T., Gentile-Fusillo N., Raddi R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1447 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.2100T 461, 2100

    2016 doi

  145. [179]

    H., Henning W

    Tyler R. H., Henning W. G., Hamilton C. W., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..218...22T 218, 22

    2015 doi

  146. [180]

    Vanderbosch Z., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9649 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897..171V 897, 171

    2020 doi

  147. [181]

    P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0822 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917...41V 917, 41

    Vanderbosch Z. P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0822 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917...41V 917, 41

    2021 doi

  148. [182]

    A., 2018, in Deeg H

    Vanderburg A., Rappaport S. A., 2018, in Deeg H. J., Belmonte J. A., eds, , Handbook of Exoplanets. Springer International Publishing, p. 37, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_37

    2018 doi

  149. [183]

    Vanderburg A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature15527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.526..546V 526, 546

    2015 doi

  150. [184]

    Veras D., 2016, @doi [Royal Society Open Science] 10.1098/rsos.150571 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RSOS....350571V 3, 150571

    2016 doi

  151. [185]

    Veras D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa625 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.4692V 493, 4692

    2020 doi

  152. [186]

    Veras D., Fuller J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.2941V 489, 2941

    2019 doi

  153. [187]

    Veras D., Fuller J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa309 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.6059V 492, 6059

    2020 doi

  154. [188]

    M., Bonsor A., G \"a nsicke B

    Veras D., Leinhardt Z. M., Bonsor A., G \"a nsicke B. T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1871 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.2244V 445, 2244

    2014 doi

  155. [189]

    M., Eggl S., G \"a nsicke B

    Veras D., Leinhardt Z. M., Eggl S., G \"a nsicke B. T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3453V 451, 3453

    2015 doi

  156. [190]

    J., Leinhardt Z

    Veras D., Carter P. J., Leinhardt Z. M., G \"a nsicke B. T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2748 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.1008V 465, 1008

    2017 doi

  157. [191]

    Veras D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz965 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.3831V 486, 3831

    2019 doi

  158. [192]

    H., Makarov V

    Veras D., McDonald C. H., Makarov V. V., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa243 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.5291V 492, 5291

    2020 doi

  159. [193]

    Veras D., Birader Y., Zaman U., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3490 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.3379V 510, 3379

    2022 doi

  160. [194]

    Veras D., Georgakarakos N., Dobbs-Dixon I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3274 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.4537V 518, 4537

    2023 doi

  161. [195]

    Vick M., Lai D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.3767V 496, 3767

    2020 doi

  162. [196]

    R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.5645V 484, 5645

    Vick M., Lai D., Anderson K. R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.5645V 484, 5645

    2019 doi

  163. [197]

    Vick M., Su Y., Lai D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaea6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...943L..13V 943, L13

    2023 doi

  164. [198]

    Wang L., Zhang X., Wang J., Zhang Z.-X., Fang T., Gu W.-M., Guo J., Jiang X., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acaf5a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944...23W 944, 23

    2023 doi

  165. [199]

    G., Farihi J., G \"a nsicke B

    Wilson T. G., Farihi J., G \"a nsicke B. T., Swan A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487..133W 487, 133

    2019 doi

  166. [200]

    W., Bower S

    Woods A. W., Bower S. M., 1995, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(95)00012-2 , 131, 189

    1995 doi

  167. [201]

    P., Whipple F

    Wyatt S. P., Whipple F. L., 1950, @doi [ ] 10.1086/145244 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1950ApJ...111..134W 111, 134

    1950 doi

  168. [202]

    Xu S., Jura M., Pantoja B., Klein B., Zuckerman B., Su K. Y. L., Meng H. Y. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806L...5X 806, L5

    2015 doi

  169. [203]

    Xu S., Jura M., Dufour P., Zuckerman B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...816L..22X 816, L22

    2016 doi

  170. [204]

    Xu S., Lai S., Dennihy E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb3fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...902..127X 902, 127

    2020 doi

  171. [205]

    J., Lupu R., Dobrovolskis A., Sleep N

    Zahnle K. J., Lupu R., Dobrovolskis A., Sleep N. H., 2015, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015E&PSL.427...74Z 427, 74

    2015 doi

  172. [206]

    E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1038/330138a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987Natur.330..138Z 330, 138

    Zuckerman B., Becklin E. E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1038/330138a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987Natur.330..138Z 330, 138

    1987 doi

  173. [207]

    N., H \"u nsch M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596..477Z 596, 477

    Zuckerman B., Koester D., Reid I. N., H \"u nsch M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596..477Z 596, 477

    2003 doi

  174. [208]

    Zuckerman B., Melis C., Klein B., Koester D., Jura M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722..725Z 722, 725

    2010 doi

  175. [209]

    van Lieshout R., Min M., Dominik C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...572A..76V 572, A76

    2014 doi

  176. [210]

    van Lieshout R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629250 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..32V 596, A32

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.