Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Confined acoustic phonons in CsPbI3 nanocrystals explored by resonant Raman scattering on excitons

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Resonant Raman scattering reads the size and shape of CsPbI3 nanocrystals from the energies of their confined acoustic phonons, which rise as the crystals shrink.

desk verdict The size-dependent acoustic phonon data are solid and worth publishing; the shape inference is qualitative and needs a quantitative fit before it carries weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21194 v1 pith:DVDGVM2S submitted 2025-06-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other

Carolin Harkort , Ina V. Kalitukha , Nataliia E. Kopteva , Mikhail O. Nestoklon , Serguei V. Goupalov , Lucien Saviot , Dennis Kudlacik , Dmitri R. Yakovlev
show 3 more authors
Elena V. Kolobkova Maria S. Kuznetsova Manfred Bayer
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other
keywords resonantRamanscatteringconfinedacousticphononsCsPbI3nanocrystalsleadhalideperovskitesexciton-phononinteractionphononconfinementelasticconstantsnanocrystalshape
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the low-energy Raman spectrum of CsPbI3 nanocrystals embedded in glass is a direct readout of the nanocrystals' size and shape. It shows experimentally that optical phonon lines sit at fixed energies, while confined acoustic phonon lines shift upward as the nanocrystals shrink from about 13 nm to 4 nm. It reproduces these shifts with a continuum model that combines density-functional-theory elastic constants with numerically computed phonon modes for cubes, spheres, and spheroids, and matches the measured spectra best for spherical or spheroidal shapes. If right, resonant Raman scattering, which needs no electrical contacts and works on glass-embedded samples that are hard to image, becomes a structural characterization tool for perovskite nanocrystals.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the Raman intensity formula $I(\Omega;R) \sim \frac{1}{R} I_1(\Omega R/\langle c\rangle) \sum_i \delta V_i \, \tilde{\delta}(\Omega-\Omega_i)$, where $I_1$ is the squared overlap of the phonon displacement with the confined exciton envelope, $\delta V_i$ is the volume variation of phonon mode $i$, and $\langle c\rangle$ is the average sound velocity. The model combines density-functional-theory elastic constants with numerical solution of the continuum elastic eigenproblem for cubes, spheres, and spheroids in orthorhombic and tetragonal crystal symmetries, under free boundary conditions. The selection physics is that the exciton–phonon coupling is proportional to $\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}$, so Raman-active modes are precisely those with nonzero volume variation, and the envelope overlap restricts the observable modes to a few per size.

What would settle it

Measure low-frequency Raman spectra of the same CsPbI$_3$ nanocrystals in colloidal suspension (free surfaces) and compare against the glass-embedded values at matched exciton energies; the free-boundary model predicts equal peak positions, whereas any systematic matrix-induced shift would refute it. Alternatively, a transmission-electron-microscopy shape histogram that shows mostly cubes would directly contradict the spherical/spheroidal conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Resonant Raman scattering on excitons in CsPbI$_3$ nanocrystals reveals a series of confined acoustic phonon modes with energies between roughly 0.25 and 2.5 meV whose positions grow as the nanocrystal size decreases, while the optical phonon modes (2.7–8.3 meV) stay put. Because only phonon modes that change the crystal volume couple to the exciton through the deformation potential, and because the exciton envelope selects phonon wave vectors comparable to its own, just a few acoustic modes dominate the spectrum. Matching the measured modes against spectra computed for different shapes leads to the conclusion that the nanocrystals are predominantly spherical or spheroidal, with the lowest observed peak originating from the fundamental spheroidal ($\ell=2$) mode and the highest from the breathing ($\ell=0$) mode.

Load-bearing premise

The modeled phonon spectra assume free boundary conditions at the nanocrystal surface, but the nanocrystals are embedded in a glass matrix whose mechanical grip is unknown; if the matrix materially loads the surface, the phonon energies shift and the inferred size and shape would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Raman-derived acoustic phonon energies give the nanocrystal size in situ, with smaller crystals producing higher-energy modes across the 4–13 nm range.
  • The number and splitting of low-energy Raman lines encode shape: a single strong peak marks spheres, an extra peak marks spheroids, and a smeared fine structure marks cubes.
  • Optical phonon lines serve as a size-independent reference, so the acoustic shifts can be read off without an external size calibration.
  • The technique works where TEM is difficult, such as glass-embedded nanocrystals that accumulate charge, and can also probe the crystal phase through the different spectra of orthorhombic versus tetragonal material.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spheroidal assignment holds, the relative strength of the $\ell=2$ peak carries information about the aspect-ratio distribution, so the Raman spectrum could be inverted to map shape distributions across a sample without electron microscopy.
  • The same measurement on colloidal nanocrystals of matched size would test the free-boundary assumption directly, since any matrix-induced load would shift the acoustic peaks; the paper itself anticipates a glass-versus-solution comparison.
  • Because the confined acoustic phonon energies overlap the exciton fine-structure splitting, the identified modes are natural candidates for the phonons that mediate bright-to-dark exciton relaxation, which could be checked in time-resolved emission measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports resonant Raman spectroscopy of CsPbI3 nanocrystals embedded in fluorophosphate glass, covering excitation energies of 1.72–2.25 eV and inferred sizes of 4–13 nm. The central experimental result is that low-energy Raman lines assigned to confined acoustic phonons shift to higher energies with decreasing nanocrystal size, while optical phonon energies remain size-independent. The authors model acoustic phonons in the continuum approximation using DFT elastic constants for orthorhombic and tetragonal CsPbI3 and for nanocrystal shapes including cube, sphere, and spheroid, coupling the phonons to the exciton through a deformation potential. By comparing measured acoustic peak positions with calculated mode branches, they conclude that the nanocrystals in their samples are predominantly spherical or spheroidal in shape.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper is a valuable demonstration that resonant Raman scattering can probe both size and shape of embedded perovskite nanocrystals, a characterization task that is difficult for nanocrystals in glass. A clear strength is that the phonon eigenfrequencies are not fitted to the Raman data: they follow from first-principles elastic constants and continuum eigenmode calculations, so the predicted size dependence of the acoustic phonon energies is non-circular. The experimental trend that acoustic phonon energies increase with decreasing size is robust across four samples and does not depend on the finer details of the shape model. The weaker element is the shape discrimination, which is at present qualitative; the paper would be significantly strengthened by a quantitative comparison with uncertainties, including the uncertainty in the size–energy interpolation of Eq. (S10).

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 5 and Supporting Information S4] The conclusion that the nanocrystals are 'predominantly spherical or spheroidal' rests on a visual comparison of measured peak positions with calculated spheroid mode branches in Fig. 5 and Fig. S3, with no quantitative goodness-of-fit, no error bars on the measured peak positions in Fig. 2e or Fig. 5, and no treatment of the broad nanocrystal size distribution within each sample. Because Eq. (S10) is an interpolation with a claimed tolerance of about 20 meV, a spherical model with a slightly different size–energy calibration could plausibly reproduce the same peak positions. I request a quantitative comparison (for example, residuals or a chi-square-like measure for sphere, spheroid, and cube models over all four samples) together with a statement of the systematic uncertainty from the size–energy mapping before the shape claim can be accepted.
  2. [Main text, 'All presented simulations assume free boundary conditions'; S4] The free-boundary assumption is load-bearing for the size and shape inference, yet the authors themselves state in S4 that the mechanical contact between nanocrystal and glass matrix is undetermined and that 'additional studies are needed to determine which of the options is realized in our samples.' Figure 3b,d shows that introducing a velocity contrast (Set IV in Table 1) shifts the phonon energies relative to Sets I–III. Because the experimental peaks are assigned to specific computed modes on an absolute energy scale, the unknown boundary condition introduces a systematic uncertainty that could change the inferred size or shape. Please quantify the sensitivity of the predicted mode energies and of the sphere/spheroid discrimination to the boundary-condition parameter sets used in Table 1.
  3. [Supporting Information S4] The assignment of the lowest experimental peak to the fundamental spheroidal l=2 mode is undermined by the paper's own statement that in the isotropic approximation the exciton–phonon interaction with this mode is zero for simple bands and that an additional symmetry-lowering mechanism is required to make it Raman active. Since this peak is one of the main discriminators between the sphere and spheroid models, the manuscript should either identify and model the activation mechanism or present the l=2 assignment as a tentative hypothesis rather than as part of the shape conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2e] The four data series are plotted without error bars; please state the uncertainty in the Gaussian peak positions, since the text says the lines were fitted with Gaussian functions.
  2. [Eq. (5)] The average sound velocity <c> = 1.4 x 10^5 cm/s is introduced with a reference but without a definition of how it is obtained from the DFT elastic constants; please clarify this relation.
  3. [Supporting Information, Eqs. (S9) and (S10)] The text explains that the interpolation is justified by the dependence of confinement energy on volume, but it does not explain why the cubic and spherical forms differ; a short clarifying sentence would help.
  4. [Figure 1 caption] The label 'RIPL' in the panels is not defined in the caption; please define the red symbols and the abbreviation.
  5. [References] The reference list jumps from Ref. 26 in the introduction to Ref. 35; references 27–34 should be cited at their first appropriate place in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phonon spectra are computed from DFT elastic constants and continuum elasticity, with the Raman data used only as an independent comparison.

full rationale

The central quantitative predictions—the eigenfrequencies of confined acoustic phonons, their 1/R size scaling, and the shape-dependent fine structure—are obtained by solving the continuum elastic problem with elastic constants computed ab initio by DFT, not by fitting to the measured Raman shifts. The size–exciton-energy calibration (Eq. S10) comes from independent empirical tight-binding calculations and is used only to place theoretical curves on the experimental excitation-energy axis; even the paper's own stated tolerance of about 20 meV would not alter the qualitative trend that acoustic phonon energies increase with decreasing size. The spheroid comparison uses a fixed aspect ratio (1.8) and free boundary conditions, and the paper explicitly acknowledges in Supporting Information S4 that boundary conditions at the NC/glass interface are not fully determined and may account for quantitative discrepancies. Thus the shape conclusion is a model-comparison result with stated limitations, not a quantity re-inserted from the data. Self-citations occur (e.g., Refs. 30–34, 55, S10), but they support standard continuum theory, DFT methodology, or the independent size-energy interpolation; none of these is equivalent to the paper's target claims. No equation in the derivation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a renamed measured quantity, or an author-imported uniqueness assertion. The main weakness—the need for an ad hoc symmetry-lowering mechanism to activate the lowest spheroidal ℓ=2 peak—is a robustness concern for the shape inference, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison depends on four effective numerical parameters (broadening, spheroid aspect ratio, average sound velocity, and the ETB size-energy interpolation), several domain assumptions about elasticity, boundary conditions, and deformation potentials, and the choice of DFT elastic constants. No new physical entities are introduced. The ETB size-energy interpolation is the most consequential parameter set because it converts every measured laser energy into a nanocrystal diameter and therefore sets the whole size axis.

free parameters (4)
  • Gaussian broadening sigma = 30 µeV
    Linewidth parameter in Eq. (5) (tilde-delta); chosen to reproduce spectral broadening, affects line shapes but not peak positions.
  • Spheroid aspect ratio D_x,z/D_y = 1.8
    Fixed aspect ratio for the spheroid model in Figure 4b/f; controls activation and splitting of l=2 modes, chosen without fitting procedure.
  • Average sound velocity <c> = 1.4e5 cm/s
    Used in Eq. (5) to convert phonon frequency to wave vector for the exciton-phonon overlap I1; approximate isotropic value referenced to Ref. 58.
  • ETB size-energy interpolation constants in Eq. (S10): E_X = 1.652 eV, 16 eV nm^2, 3.307 nm^2 = 1.652, 16, 3.307
    Constants fitted to the authors' empirical tight-binding calculations (Ref. S10); this mapping from exciton energy to NC diameter sets the size axis for all comparisons.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Continuum elasticity provides accurate confined acoustic phonon modes in 4-13 nm nanocrystals.
    Central modeling choice; standard for low-frequency modes but not validated at the smallest sizes.
  • ad hoc to paper Free boundary conditions at the nanocrystal/glass interface.
    Stated in the main text; the matrix coupling is unknown and the authors' own Figure 3 shows velocity contrast shifts phonon energies.
  • domain assumption Exciton-phonon interaction is dominated by the isotropic deformation potential proportional to div u.
    Supporting Information S4; anisotropic contributions from distant bands are neglected.
  • domain assumption Strong confinement envelope: electron and hole envelopes are products of sin(pi r/R)/(sqrt(2 pi R) r).
    Supporting Information S4, Eqs. (S4)-(S5); appropriate for strong confinement, which is only approximately satisfied.
  • domain assumption PBEsol DFT elastic constants (Table S1) represent the elastic properties of the nanocrystals.
    Authors note sensitivity to exchange-correlation functional and absence of experimental elastic constants; used for all numerical spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper Exciton energy maps to NC diameter via the empirical tight-binding interpolation Eq. (S10).
    This mapping is fitted to the authors' prior ETB data (Ref. S10/S51) and neglects exciton binding and its confinement renormalization.
  • standard math Only total angular momentum l=0 and l=2 acoustic modes are Raman active.
    Selection rules from Refs. 30-32; the observed l=2 mode requires an unspecified additional symmetry-lowering mechanism.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Confined acoustic phonons in CsPbI3 nanocrystals explored by resonant Raman scattering on excitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DVDGVM2S

@misc{pith2026250621194,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Confined acoustic phonons in CsPbI3 nanocrystals explored by resonant Raman scattering on excitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DVDGVM2S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21194}
}
read the original abstract

Optical properties of the lead halide perovskites nanocrystals are controlled by confined excitons and rich spectrum of confined acoustic and optical phonons. We study experimentally and theoretically the exciton-phonon interaction in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals embedded in a glass matrix. Energies of phonon modes allowed by selection rules are detected by resonant Raman scattering for nanocrystals with sizes of 4-13 nm, covering exciton energies of 1.72-2.25 eV. While optical phonon energies remain size-independent, the energies of confined acoustic phonons increase in smaller nanocrystals. Acoustic phonons are modeled within the continuum approximation using elastic constants computed by density functional theory. The model provides the energy spectra of confined phonons for nanocrystals of various shapes (cube, sphere, spheroid), crystal symmetries (orthorhombic and tetragonal), and sizes. Exciton confinement restricts efficient coupling to only few phonon modes observable in Raman spectra. By comparing experimental data with model predictions, we conclude that the nanocrystals in our samples predominantly have spherical or spheroidal shapes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.21194 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Optical properties of CsPbI3 NCs at T = 1.6 K. Photoluminescence (blue) spectra for samples: #1 (a), #2 (b), #3 (c), and #4 (d). The photon excitation energy for the PL measurements is 3.49 eV. The red symbols show the Raman intensity as function of the excitation energy. The red lines are guides for the eye. Spectrum of phonons active in Raman scattering in samples #1 (e) and #3 (f). Laser power density is 0.06 W/c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Raman spectra of acoustic phonons for CsPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The dotted line shows the phonon amplitudes in the nanocrystal, calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a-d) Amplitude and shift of the Raman lines as function of the exciton energy re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lowest 20 phonon modes with symmetry Ag in the spheroidal CsPbI3 NCs cal￾culated as function of exciton energy. Dashed lines show the positions of all phonon modes and thicker color lines reproduce the calculated Raman active peaks from Figure 4f. Exper￾imental data ar…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K.; Kulkarni, A.; Miyasaka, T

    Jena, A. K.; Kulkarni, A.; Miyasaka, T. Halide perovskite photovoltaics: Background, status, and future prospects. Chemical Reviews 2019, 5, 3036--3103

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Best Research - Cell Efficiency Chart, https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Halide Perovskites for Photonics; Vinattieri, A.; Giorgi, G., Eds.; AIP Publishing: Melville, New York, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    V; Beard, M

    Hybrid Organic Inorganic Perovskites: Physical Properties and Applications; Vardeny, Z. V; Beard, M. C., Eds.; World Scientific, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    R.; Liu, X.; McGill, S.; Semenov, D.; Guo, H.; Tsuchikawa, R.; Deshpande, V

    Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, H.; McLaughlin, R.; Zhai, Y.; Vardeny, S. R.; Liu, X.; McGill, S.; Semenov, D.; Guo, H.; Tsuchikawa, R.; Deshpande, V. V.; Sun, D.; Vardeny, Z. V. Spin-optoelectronic devices based on hybrid organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 129

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    A.; Crespo, G

    Ning, W.; Bao, J.; Puttisong, Y.; Moro, F.; Kobera, L.; Shimono, S.; Wang, L.; Ji, F.; Cuartero, M.; Kawaguchi, S.; Abbrent, S.; Ishibashi, H.; De Marco, R.; Bouianova, I. A.; Crespo, G. A.; Kubota, Y.; Brus, J.; Chung, D. Y.; Sun, L.; Chen, W. M.; Kanatzidis, M. G; Gao, F. Magnetizing lead free halide double perovskites. Science Advances 2020, 6, eabb5381

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    A.; Harvey, S

    Kim, Y.-H.; Zhai, Y.; Lu, H.; Pan, X.; Xiao, C.; Gaulding, E. A.; Harvey, S. P.; Berry, J. J.; Vardeny, Z. V.; Luther, J. M.; Beard, M. C. Chiral-induced spin selectivity enables a room-temperature spin light-emitting diode. Science 2021, 371, 1129

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    V.; Protesescu, L; Bondarchuk, M

    Kovalenko, M. V.; Protesescu, L; Bondarchuk, M. I. Properties and potential optoelectronic applications of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Science 2017, 358, 745--750

    work page 2017

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    A.; Guan, X.; Han, S.; Liang, L.; Yi, Z.; Li, J.; Xie, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Fan, D.; Teh, D

    Chen, Q.; Wu, J.; Ou, X.; Huang, B.; Almutlaq, J.; Zhumekenov, A. A.; Guan, X.; Han, S.; Liang, L.; Yi, Z.; Li, J.; Xie, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Fan, D.; Teh, D. B. L.; All, A. H.; Mohammed, O. F.; Bakr, O. M.; Wu, T.; Bettinelli, M.; Yang, H.; Huang, W.; Liu, X. All-inorganic p...

    2018

  2. [10]

    I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C

    Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M. I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C. H.; Yang, R. X.; Walsh, A.; Kovalenko, M. V. Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX _3 , X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color ...

    2015

  3. [11]

    A.; Rain\'o, G.; Kovalenko, M

    Akkerman, Q. A.; Rain\'o, G.; Kovalenko, M. V.; Manna, L. Genesis, challenges and opportunities for colloidal lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Nature Mater. 2018, 17, 394

    2018

  4. [12]

    S.; Klimov, V

    Park, Y.-S.; Guo, S.; Makarov, N. S.; Klimov, V. I. Room temperature single-photon emission from individual perovskite quantum dots. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10386--10393

    2015

  5. [13]

    Ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited carriers in perovskite semiconductor nanocrystals

    Yu, B.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Qin, Z.; Huang, X.; Wang X.; Xiao M. Ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited carriers in perovskite semiconductor nanocrystals. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 1943--1965

    2021

  6. [14]

    He; Liang, X.; Xiang, W

    Li, P.; Hu, C.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, J.; Cheng, Y.;, M. He; Liang, X.; Xiang, W. Novel synthesis and optical characterization of CsPb _2 Br _5 quantum dots in borosilicate glasses, Mater. Lett. 2017, 209 , 483--485

    2017

  7. [15]

    Novel CsPbI _3 QDs glass with chemical stability and optical properties

    Liu, S.; Luo, Y.; He, M.; Liang, X.; Xiang, W. Novel CsPbI _3 QDs glass with chemical stability and optical properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38 , 1998--2004

    2018

  8. [16]

    He, M.; Di, X.; Li, P.; Xiang, W.; Liang, X

    Liu, S. ; He, M.; Di, X.; Li, P.; Xiang, W.; Liang, X. Precipitation and tunable emission of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX _3 , X = Br, I) QDs in borosilicate glass. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44 , 4496--4499

    2018

  9. [17]

    Highly luminescent cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals stabilized in glasses for light-emitting applications

    Ye, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Deng, Z.; Zhao, X.; Han, J. Highly luminescent cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals stabilized in glasses for light-emitting applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7 , 1801663

    2019

  10. [18]

    V.; Kuznetsova, M

    Kolobkova, E. V.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Nikonorov, N. V. Perovskite CsPbX 3 (X = Cl, Br, I) nanocrystals in fluorophosphate glasses. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 2021, 563 , 120811

    2021

  11. [19]

    V.; Skorikov, M

    Belykh, V. V.; Skorikov, M. L.; Kulebyakina, E. V.; Kolobkova, E. V.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Glazov, M. M.; Yakovlev, D. R. Submillisecond spin relaxation in CsPb(Cl,Br) _3 perovskite nanocrystals in a glass matrix. Nano Lett. 2022, 22 , 4583--4588

    2022

  12. [20]

    I.; Onushchenko, A

    Ekimov A. I.; Onushchenko, A. A. Quantum size effect in three-dimensional microscopic semiconductor crystals. Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1981, 34, 363 [JETP Lett. 34, 345 (1981)]

    1981

  13. [21]

    L.; Efros, A

    Efros, Al. L.; Efros, A. L. Interband absorption of light in a semiconductor sphere. Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. 1982, 16, 1209 [Sov. Phys. Semicond. 16, 772 (1982)]

    1982

  14. [22]

    I.; Efros, Al

    Ekimov, A. I.; Efros, Al. L.; Onushenko, A. A. Quantum size effect in semiconductor microcrystals. Solid State Commun. 1985, 56, 921

    1985

  15. [23]

    B.; Norris, D

    Murray, C. B.; Norris, D. J.; Bawendi, M. G. Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 19, 8706–8715

    1993

  16. [24]

    V.; Lee, J.-S.; Kovalenko, M

    Talapin, D. V.; Lee, J.-S.; Kovalenko, M. V.; Shevchenko, E. V. Prospects of colloidal nanocrystals for electronic and optoelectronic applications. Chemical Reviews 2010, 110, 389-458

    2010

  17. [25]

    -Y.; G\'erard, J

    Marzin, J. -Y.; G\'erard, J. -M.; Izra\"el, A.; Barrier, D.; Bastard, G. Photoluminescence of single InAs quantum dots obtained by self-organized growth on GaAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73, 716

    1994

  18. [26]

    ohrer, J.; Bimberg, D.; Ruvimov, S. S.; Werner, P.; Richter, U.; G\

    Grundmann, M.; Christen, J.; Ledentsov, N. N.; B\"ohrer, J.; Bimberg, D.; Ruvimov, S. S.; Werner, P.; Richter, U.; G\"osele, U.; Heydenreich, J.; Ustinov, V. M.; Egorov, A. Yu.; Zhukov, A. E.; Kop'ev, P. S.; Alferov, Zh. I. Ultranarrow luminescence lines from single quantum do...

    1995

  19. [27]

    On the vibrations of an elastic sphere

    Lamb, H. On the vibrations of an elastic sphere. Proc. London Math. Soc. 1881, s1-13, 189

  20. [28]

    Acoustic vibrations in nanoparticles

    Saviot, L.; Mermet, A.; Duval, E. Acoustic vibrations in nanoparticles. In Nanoparticles and Quantum Dots, Handbook of Nanophysics Vol. 3, Sattler, K. D. Ed.; CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011; Chap. 11, pp. 11-1–11-16

    2011

  21. [29]

    Classical problems in the theory of elasticity and the quantum theory of angular momentum

    Goupalov, S.V. Classical problems in the theory of elasticity and the quantum theory of angular momentum. Usp. Fiz. Nauk 2020, 190, 63 [Phys.-Usp. 63, 57 (2020)]

    2020

  22. [30]

    Far-infrared and Raman vibrational transitions of a solid sphere: Selection rules

    Duval, E. Far-infrared and Raman vibrational transitions of a solid sphere: Selection rules. Phys. Rev. B. 1992, 46, 5795

    1992

  23. [31]

    V.; Merkulov, I

    Gupalov, S. V.; Merkulov, I. A. Theory of Raman light scattering by nanocrystal acoustic vibrations. Phys. Solid State 1999, 41, 1349--1358

    1999

  24. [32]

    V.; Ekimov, A

    Goupalov, S. V.; Ekimov, A. I.; Lublinskaya, O. G.; Merkulov, I. A. Raman Spectroscopy of Exciton-Acoustic Phonon Coupling in Semiconductor Nanocrystals. In: Sadowski, M. L.; Potemski, M.; Grynberg, M. (eds) Optical Properties of Semiconductor Nanostructures. NATO Science Seri...

    2000

  25. [33]

    O.; Goupalov, S

    Nestoklon, M. O.; Goupalov, S. V. Exciton interaction with acoustic phonons in PbS nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 045306

    2022

  26. [34]

    Saviot, L.; Murray, D. B. Acoustic vibrations of anisotropic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 214101--214112

    2009

  27. [35]

    C.; Sachat, A

    Ng, R. C.; Sachat, A. E.; Cespedes, F.; Poblet, M.; Madiot, G.; Jaramillo-Fernandez, J.; Florez, O.; Xiao, P.; Sledzinska, M.; Sotomayor-Torres, C. M.; Chavez-Angel, E. Excitation and detection of acoustic phonons in nanoscale systems. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 13428

    2022

  28. [36]

    Raman scattering from acoustic phonons confined in Si nanocrystals

    Fujii, M.; Kanzawa, Y.; Hayashi, S.; Yamamoto, K. Raman scattering from acoustic phonons confined in Si nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, R8373

    1996

  29. [37]

    A.; Ekimov, A

    Saviot, L.; Champagnon, B.; Duval, E.; Kudriavtsev, I. A.; Ekimov, A. I. Size dependence of acoustic and optical vibrational modes of CdSe nanocrystals in glasses. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 1996, 197, 238--246

    1996

  30. [38]

    A.; Belitsky, V

    Sirenko, A. A.; Belitsky, V. I.; Ruf, T.; Cardona, M.; Ekimov, A. I.; Trallero-Giner, C. Spin-flip and acoustic-phonon Raman scattering in CdS nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 2077--2087

    1998

  31. [39]

    Saviot, L.; Champagnon, B.; Duval, E.; Ekimov, A. I. Size-selective resonant Raman scattering in CdS doped glasses. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 341--346

    1998

  32. [40]

    D.; Wise, F

    Krauss, T. D.; Wise, F. W. Coherent acoustic phonons in a semiconductor quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 5102

    1997

  33. [41]

    Ikezawa, M.; Okuno, T.; Masumoto, Y.; Lipovskii, A. A. Complementary detection of confined acoustic phonons in quantum dots by coherent phonon measurement and Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 201315(R)

    2001

  34. [42]

    Nanodiamond size from low-frequency acoustic Raman modes

    Vlk, A.; Ledinsky, M.; Shiryaev, A.; Ekimov, E.; Stehlik, S. Nanodiamond size from low-frequency acoustic Raman modes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 6318--6324

    2022

  35. [43]

    T.; Joshi, P

    Miyata, K.; Meggiolaro, D.; Trinh, M. T.; Joshi, P. P.; Mosconi, E.; Jones, S. C.; De Angelis, F.; Zhu, X.-Y. Large polarons in lead halide perovskites. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1701217

    2017

  36. [44]

    Origin of low carrier mobilities in halide perovskites

    Ponc \'e , S.; Schlipf, M.; Giustino, F. Origin of low carrier mobilities in halide perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 456

    2019

  37. [45]

    L.; Lounis, B

    Fu, M.; Tamarat, P.; Huang, H.; Even, J.; Rogach, A. L.; Lounis, B. Neutral and charged exciton fine structure in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals revealed by magneto-optical spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2895--2901

    2017

  38. [46]

    Luminescence fine structures in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals: Size dependence of the exciton--phonon coupling

    Cho, K.; Yamada, T.; Tahara, H.; Tadano, T.; Suzuura, H.; Saruyama, M.; Sato, R.; Teranishi, T.; Kanemitsu, Y. Luminescence fine structures in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals: Size dependence of the exciton--phonon coupling. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 7206

    2021

  39. [47]

    M.; Brodu, A.; van Hoof, N

    Iaru, C. M.; Brodu, A.; van Hoof, N. J. J.; ter Huurne, S. E. T.; Buhot, J.; Montanarella, F.; Buhbut, S.; Christianen, P. C. M.; Vanmaekelbergh, D.; de Mello Donega, C.; Rivas, J. G.; Koenraad, P. M.; Silov, A. Y. Fr \"o hlich interaction dominated by a single phonon mode in ...

    2021

  40. [48]

    Spectral fingerprint of quantum confinement in single CsPbBr _3 nanocrystals

    Amara, M.-R.; Said, Z.; Huo, C.; Pierret, A.; Voisin, C.; Gao, W.; Xiong, Q.; Diederichs, C. Spectral fingerprint of quantum confinement in single CsPbBr _3 nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 3607

    2023

  41. [49]

    Exciton-acoustic phonon coupling revealed by resonant excitation of single perovskite nanocrystals

    Lv, Y.; Yin, C.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z.-G.; Xiao, M. Exciton-acoustic phonon coupling revealed by resonant excitation of single perovskite nanocrystals. Nature Commun. 2021, 12, 2192

    2021

  42. [50]

    R.; Zhukov, E

    Meliakov, S. R.; Zhukov, E. A.; Belykh; V. V., Nestoklon; M. O., Kolobkova, E. V.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Bayer, M.; Yakovlev, D. R. Land\'e g -factors of electrons and holes strongly confined in CsPbI _3 perovskite nanocrystals in glass. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 6522

    2025

  43. [51]

    O.; Kirstein, E.; Yakovlev, D

    Nestoklon, M. O.; Kirstein, E.; Yakovlev, D. R.; Zhukov, E. A.; Glazov, M. M.; Semina, M. A.; Ivchenko, E. L.; Kolobkova, E. V.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Bayer, M. Tailoring the electron and hole Land\'e factors in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals by quantum confinement and halid...

    2023

  44. [52]

    R.; Zhukov, E

    Meliakov, S. R.; Zhukov, E. A.; Belykh, V. V.; Nestoklon, M. O.; Kolobkova, E. V.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Bayer, M.; Yakovlev, D. R. Temperature dependence of the electron and hole Land\'e g -factors in CsPbI _3 nanocrystals embedded in a glass matrix. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 21496

    2024

  45. [53]

    N.; Kuznetsova, M

    Bataev, M. N.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Pankin, D. V.; Smirnov, M. B.; Verbin, S. Yu.; Ignatiev, I. V.; Eliseyev, I. A.; Davydov, V. Yu.; Smirnov, A. N.; Kolobkova, E. V. Electron-phonon interaction in perovskite nanocrystals in fluorophosphate glass matrix. Semiconductors 2024, 58, 103-109

    2024

  46. [54]

    Martin, R. M. Theory of the one-phonon resonance Raman effect. Phys. Rev. B 1971, 4, 3676

    1971

  47. [55]

    Free vibrations of anisotropic nano-objects with rounded or sharp corners

    Saviot, L. Free vibrations of anisotropic nano-objects with rounded or sharp corners. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1838

    2021

  48. [56]

    P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G

    Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406

    2008

  49. [57]

    Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Tran, F.; Laskowski, R.; Madsen, G. K. H.; Marks, L. D. WIEN2k: An APW+lo program for calculating the properties of solids. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 074101

    2020

  50. [58]

    Anderson, O. L. A simplified method for calculating the debye temperature from elastic constants. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1963, 24, 909--917

    1963

  51. [59]

    Wherrett, B. S. Group Theory for Atoms, Molecules and Solids; Prentice Hall International: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986

    1986

  52. [60]

    O.; Goupalov, S

    Nestoklon, M. O.; Goupalov, S. V.; Dzhioev, R. I.; Ken, O. S.; Korenev, V. L.; Kusrayev, Yu. G.; Sapega, V. F.; de Weerd, C.; Gomez, L.; Gregorkiewicz, T.; Lin, J.; Suenaga, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Matyushkin, L. B.; Yassievich, I. N. Optical orientation and alignment of excitons in...

    2018

  53. [61]

    Tamarat, P.; Prin, E.; Berezovska, Y.; Moskalenko, A.; Nguyen, T. P. T.; Xia, C.; Hou, L.; Trebbia, J.-B.; Zacharias, M.; Pedesseau, L.; Katan, C.; Bodnarchuk, M. I.; Kovalenko, M. V.; Even, J.; Lounis, B. Universal scaling laws for charge-carrier interactions with quantum con...

    2023

  54. [62]

    C.; Wu, K

    Han, Y.; Liang, W.; Lin, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, F.; Zhang, F.; Sercel, P. C.; Wu, K. Lattice distortion inducing exciton splitting and coherent quantum beating in CsPbI _3 perovskite quantum dots. Nature Materials 2022, 21 , 1282

    2022

  55. [63]

    Ivchenko, E. L. Optical Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanostructures; Alpha Science, 2005

    2005

  56. [64]

    Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Tran, F.; Laskowski, R.; Madsen, G. K. H.; Marks, L. D. WIEN2k: An APW+lo program for calculating the properties of solids. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152 , 074101

    2020

  57. [65]

    IRelast package

    Jamal, M.; Bilal, M.; Ahmad, I.; Jalali-Asadabadi, S. IRelast package. J. Alloys and Compounds 2018, 735 , 569

    2018

  58. [66]

    B.; Pitaevskii, L

    Berestetskii, V. B.; Pitaevskii, L. P.; Lifshits, E. M. Quantum Electrodynamics: Volume 4; Butterworth-Heinemann, 1982

    1982

  59. [67]

    Far-infrared and Raman vibrational transitions of a solid sphere: Selection rules

    Duval, E. Far-infrared and Raman vibrational transitions of a solid sphere: Selection rules. Phys. Rev. B. 1992, 46 , 5795

    1992

  60. [68]

    Infrared and Raman selection rules for elastic vibrations of spherical nanoparticles

    Goupalov, S. V.; Saviot, L.; Duval, E. Comment on “Infrared and Raman selection rules for elastic vibrations of spherical nanoparticles”. Phys. Rev. B. 2006, 74 , 197401

    2006

  61. [69]

    V.; Merkulov, I

    Gupalov, S. V.; Merkulov, I. A. Theory of Raman light scattering by nanocrystal acoustic vibrations. Phys. Solid State 1999, 41 , 1349--1358

    1999

  62. [70]

    O.; Kirstein, E.; Yakovlev, D

    Nestoklon, M. O.; Kirstein, E.; Yakovlev, D. R.; Zhukov, E. A.; Glazov, M. M.; Semina, M. A.; Ivchenko, E. L.; Kolobkova, E. V.; Kuznetsova, M. S.; Bayer, M. Tailoring the electron and hole Land\'e factors in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals by quantum confinement and halid...

    2023

  63. [71]

    E.; Wang, J

    Galkowski, K.; Mitioglu, A.; Miyata, A.; Plochocka, P.; Portugall, O.; Eperon, G. E.; Wang, J. T.-W.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Stranks, S. D.; Snaith, H. J.; Nicholas, R. J. Determination of the exciton binding energy and effective masses for methylammonium and formamidinium lead tr...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.