Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 131 references

A Survey on Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution for Secure Data Transmission: Toward the Future of Secured Quantum-Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that continuous-variable QKD, which encodes keys in the quadratures of coherent or squeezed light, is the near-term practical route to quantum-secure networks because it reuses telecom components and supports chip-scale…

desk verdict A useful newcomer-oriented CV-QKD survey whose organizational value is undercut by several real technical errors, including a mistaken claim about classical-channel homodyne results and man-in-the-middle attacks. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21640 v1 pith:4WL3AAD7 submitted 2025-06-25 quant-ph physics.optics

Mobin Motaharifar , Mahmood Hasani , Hassan Kaatuzian This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords continuous-variablequantumkeydistributionsqueezedlightphotonicintegratedcircuitsmachinelearningtensornetworksmeasurement-device-independentQKDhomodynedetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD), which encodes key bits in the amplitude and phase quadratures of coherent or squeezed light, is the near-term practical route to quantum-secure networks. Unlike discrete-variable QKD, which needs single-photon sources and detectors, CV-QKD works with standard telecom lasers, modulators, and homodyne receivers, and it has been demonstrated over 50 to 100 km of fiber. The paper gathers evidence that photonic integrated circuits can put these systems on a chip, that machine learning can suppress excess noise and detect eavesdropping, and that measurement-device-independent protocols remove the main detector side channels. If the survey's picture is right, large metropolitan quantum networks can be built by upgrading existing optical infrastructure rather than replacing it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the continuous-variable encoding itself: information is carried in the quadratures of coherent or squeezed states and read out by homodyne or heterodyne detection, which is exactly the hardware of coherent optical telecommunications. Security and rate are governed by the formula $K = \beta I(A:B) - \chi(E)$, where $\beta$ is reconciliation efficiency, $I(A:B)$ the Alice-Bob mutual information, and $\chi(E)$ Eve's Holevo bound computed from symplectic eigenvalues of the covariance matrix. The paper treats the squeezed state, generated by parametric down-conversion, four-wave mixing, or micro-ring resonators, as the enabling resource, and chip-scale integration of sources, modulators, and detectors as the scaling path.

What would settle it

A field trial over a metropolitan fiber link in which, under fully untrusted-device assumptions, the measured excess noise drives the finite-size composable secret key rate to zero at the protocol's nominal distance and modulation would falsify the survey's central practicality claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that CV-QKD has matured from laboratory protocol to deployable technology: it reports that fiber-based CV-QKD reached roughly 1 kbps over 80 km and beyond 100 km once excess noise was managed, that chip-based homodyne detectors and quantum entropy sources exist, and that measurement-device-independent QKD variants have run over 404 km of fiber and a 19.2 km urban free-space link. The security story it tells is that Gaussian and discrete-modulated CV-QKD now carry composable security proofs, while machine-learning-assisted estimation and tensor-network processing keep the rate formula $K = \beta I(A:B) - \chi(E)$ positive under realistic noise. The survey's conclusion is that these pieces fit together: CV-QKD's telecom compatibility, integrated photonics, and data-driven noise control put large-scale quantum-secure networks within practical reach.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's practicality claim rests on the assumption that the cited security proofs for Gaussian and discrete-modulated CV-QKD remain valid under realistic finite-size, composable conditions and with practical hardware noise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CV-QKD can be deployed over existing telecom fiber using commercial lasers and homodyne receivers, without single-photon detectors, making near-term metropolitan quantum networks feasible.
  • Photonic integrated circuits, especially with squeezed-light sources and modular heterogeneous integration, can shrink CV-QKD transceivers to chip scale.
  • Machine-learning-assisted noise estimation and parameter optimization can raise secret key rates and extend transmission distance by reducing excess noise.
  • Measurement-device-independent QKD variants remove detector side channels and have been demonstrated over 404 km of fiber and a 19.2 km urban free-space link, supporting CV-QKD security.
  • Tensor networks provide efficient tools for analyzing quantum correlations in complex networks, improving the robustness and efficiency of key distribution protocols.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the survey, if CV-QKD's practicality claim holds, the technology could become the default first-generation QKD for optical backhaul, because it reuses coherent transceivers already installed in telecom networks.
  • The survey's reliance on composable security proofs suggests the decisive next tests will be end-to-end key-rate demonstrations with fully untrusted devices, rather than loss-versus-rate curves alone.
  • Machine-learning-based anomaly detection may push QKD security practice toward a hybrid model that combines provable bounds with continuous hardware monitoring, an implication the paper does not develop.
  • Squeezed-light sources in micro-ring resonators could eventually make chip-scale CV-QKD inexpensive enough for subscriber premises, provided packaging and insertion losses are solved.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey of continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD). It covers squeezed states of light, continuous-variable quantum teleportation, the basic principles and experimental implementations of CV-QKD, chip-scale integration, and feasibility challenges such as squeezed-light generation, photon loss, and security. The central claim, stated in the abstract and conclusion, is that CV-QKD is a more practical alternative to discrete-variable QKD because of its compatibility with existing telecom infrastructure, and that progress in photonic integrated circuits, machine learning, and tensor networks is enabling large-scale quantum-secure networks. The paper does not present original derivations; it reviews the literature and includes proposals for an integrated teleportation circuit and a 50-km CV-QKD experimental setup.

Significance. If accurate, the survey offers a useful, broad entry point to the CV-QKD literature, especially for readers interested in photonic integration and the role of machine learning. It compiles a large bibliography and highlights concrete experimental milestones. The main value is pedagogical and bibliographic rather than advancing new technical results. However, several technical and security-related inaccuracies reduce its reliability as a reference: a missing logarithm in a central formula, a mistaken claim about man-in-the-middle protection, and an unqualified assertion about the security proofs underlying the practicality claim. These need correction before the survey can serve as a dependable guide.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6 (Conclusion)] The claim that sending homodyne measurement results over the classical channel 'partially reduce[s]' man-in-the-middle risk because 'none of the keys could be directly reconstructed using the measurement results' is incorrect. An active man-in-the-middle can replace or suppress the classical messages; QKD requires an authenticated classical channel for tamper evidence. This is a security misconception in the section that argues for practical deployment, and it should be revised to state that the classical channel must be authenticated and that measurement outcomes provide no confidentiality against active attacks.
  2. [Section 4.1, Eq. (8)] The mutual information for Gaussian-modulated coherent states is given as I(A:B) = 1/2(1 + Vs/VN). The correct expression is (1/2) log2(1 + Vs/VN). As written, the formula is dimensionally inconsistent and would give incorrect key-rate values; it also conflicts with the entropy-based definition in Eq. (7). Please correct the formula and specify the base of the logarithm.
  3. [Sections 4.1 and 5.4] The survey asserts 'robust security proofs [28–31]' and later offers qualitative mitigation strategies for side-channel attacks, but it does not state whether the cited proofs are finite-size and composable, nor whether they cover the specific protocols and experimental regimes (e.g., the 50-km, 500-kHz example in Fig. 6) used to support the practicality claim. Because the abstract's 'practical alternative' claim depends on this premise, the paper should either explicitly cite composable finite-size security results (e.g., Refs. [23,32]) and state the attack model, or qualify the claim to avoid overstating the current evidence.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Eqs. (1) and (2)] Both equations contain a duplicated exponential ('exp exp'). Please remove the redundant 'exp'.
  2. [Section 3.1, Eq. (4) and surrounding text] The notation ⟨ξ⟩ = ψ_r(x) is incorrect; the wavefunction should be denoted ψ_r(x) or similar. Also, λ is called 'the squeezing parameter,' but the squeezing parameter is r (with λ = e^{2r}). In the momentum-space wavefunction, the variable x appears instead of p. These points should be corrected.
  3. [Section 6 (Conclusion)] The phrase 'shore algorithms' should read 'Shor's algorithms.'
  4. [Section 4.3 vs. Introduction] Section 4.3 states that fiber-based DV-QKD achieves 'kbps level' rates for distances up to 100 km, while the Introduction cites a 400-km DV-QKD demonstration. These statements should be reconciled by specifying the distance/rate trade-off or the type of fiber used.
  5. [Section 5.3] The sentence 'However, this protocol demonstrates robustness [107]...' does not identify which protocol is meant. Please clarify the referent, as the preceding text discusses photon loss generally and also mentions scalability.
  6. [Section 5.4] The phrase 'Quantum attacks, including collective Gaussian attacks' conflates attack classes. Collective attacks are not the most general; coherent attacks are. Please distinguish these classes, especially when discussing the scope of the security proofs cited in Section 4.1.
  7. [Section 4.1, Eq. (7)] For continuous-variable systems, the entropies in Eq. (7) are differential entropies, not discrete Shannon entropies. The text should say so, and the logarithm base should be specified consistently with Eq. (8).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Survey is a literature review with no original derivation; self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper makes no original derivation or prediction; its central claims are summary statements about the state of the CV-QKD field. The practicality claim ('seamless compatibility with current telecommunications infrastructure') is supported by external references [20-22] and [28-31], and the experimental milestones cited (e.g., [90], [91]) are independent external results. The only equations (1)-(8) are standard definitions and known results (squeezing operator, teleportation displacements, key-rate formula) attributed to external sources such as [56], [61], and the Gaussian quantum information literature. Self-citations [60], [63], [100], [102]-[104] occur only as illustrative pointers for a teleportation simulation, an MZI cell design, and squeezed-light generation methods; none of these is used to ground the survey's main security or deployability conclusions. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own work, and no argument reduces by construction to its inputs. The Conclusion's man-in-the-middle comment is a correctness or security concern, not an instance of circularity. Accordingly, there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and introduces no new free parameters, no new axioms beyond standard quantum-optical assumptions, and no invented entities. Its cited self-works are contextual and not load-bearing.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Gaussian quantum information framework, where states are characterized by first and second moments, is valid and sufficient for CV-QKD analysis.
    Invoked throughout Section 4.1 as the basis for covariance-matrix security analysis and key-rate formulas.
  • domain assumption The cited security proofs for Gaussian and discrete-modulated CV-QKD are correct, including composable and finite-size aspects where cited.
    Section 4.1 states 'providing robust security proofs [28-31]' without reconstructing the proofs.
  • standard math The no-cloning theorem and the standard QKD threat model apply to continuous-variable protocols.
    Used implicitly in Sections 1 and 4.1 to justify why eavesdropping is detectable and why security rests on quantum mechanics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution for Secure Data Transmission: Toward the Future of Secured Quantum-Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4WL3AAD7

@misc{pith2026250621640,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution for Secure Data Transmission: Toward the Future of Secured Quantum-Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4WL3AAD7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21640}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) represents a cornerstone of secure communication in the quantum era. While discrete-variable QKD (DV-QKD) protocols were historically the first to demonstrate secure key exchange, continuous-variable QKD (CV-QKD) has emerged as a more practical alternative due to its seamless compatibility with current telecommunications infrastructure. CV-QKD relies on coherent and squeezed states of light, offering significant advantages for integration into modern optical networks. This review comprehensively explores the theoretical underpinnings, technological advancements, and practical challenges of CV-QKD. Special attention is given to the role of photonic integrated circuits (PICs) in enabling scalable and efficient implementation of CV-QKD systems. Furthermore, recent advances in machine learning have been leveraged to optimize CV-QKD performance, with data-driven techniques enhancing noise estimation, parameter optimization, and system security. Additionally, tensor networks provide efficient computational tools for analyzing complex quantum correlations, improving the efficiency and robustness of quantum key distribution protocols. These developments, combined with ongoing improvements in quantum photonic integration, pave the way for the practical deployment of large-scale, high-speed quantum-secure networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.21640 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) An arbitrary coherent state (b) is the amplitude-squeezed state of light and (c) is the phase-squeezed state of light. The quasi-probability of the perpendicular axis displays the Wigner function value. Squeezed states are generated using nonlinear optical processes such as parametric down-conversion, parametric oscillation, and twin-beam generation. These mechanisms form the basis of practical squeezed light so… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of continuous-variable quantum teleportation. An arbitrary coherent state |ψ⟩ (top rail) is to be teleported from Alice to Bob. Two infinitely squeezed vacuum states (middle and bottom rails) serve as the shared resource between them. First, these two squeezed states pass through a 50:50 beam splitter (left 50:50 block) to create an entangled EPR-like pair, with one mode held by Alice and the other mode… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Wigner function of quadrature diagram of Bob and Alice entangled states after going through beamsplitters. 3.2. Integration of Elements As pointed out in [62], any unitary transformation on individual qubits can be depicted as a series of three rotations, one around the yˆ axis and two around the zˆ axis. Motivated by this fact, a Mach-Zehnder integrated cell is appropriate for implementing an arbitrary single-qubit… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) A modified integrated unit cell inspired by the Mach-Zehnder Cell. It can act as an arbitrary Measurement gate for identifying state’s position or momentum by changing the variable θ of the phase shifter. (b) Bent directional coupler with labeled parameters: Rin an…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A 3D representation of a Photonic Integrated Circuit (PIC) designed to implement quantum teleportation in a continuous quantum variable circuit. The input states are introduced into the circuit from the left where (a) is with bent directional couplers and (b) is with c…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This is the experimental configuration proposal for a 50-km Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution (CV QKD). In this setup, DAQ refers to the data acquisition module, AM is the amplitude modulator, PM stands for the phase modulator, and PBS is the polarizing beam…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) A detailed optical setup for generating and measuring squeezed light. An infrared laser (main laser) undergoes second-harmonic generation (SHG) via a nonlinear crystal, converting it into a green pump beam. This pump beam is then used to drive an optical parametric…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) The chip is being reintroduced, as shown in a micro-graph of the actual device. (b) The provided quantum circuit diagram serves as a comparable representation of the photonic hardware, emphasizing its functional features similar to [69]. 5.3. Photon Loss Photon los…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Long-term performance of the SwissQuantum quantum key distribution network in a field environment

    D. Stuckiet al.(2011). “Long-term performance of the SwissQuantum quantum key distribution network in a field environment”.New Journal of Physics, 13: 12, 123001

    2011

  2. [2]

    Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network

    M. Sasakiet al.(2011). “Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network”.Optics Express, 19: 11, 10387–10409

    2011

  3. [3]

    Network-Centric Quantum Communications with Application to Critical Infrastructure Protection

    R. J. Hughes, J. E. Nordholt, K. P. McCabe, R. T. Newell, C. G. Peterson, and R. D. Somma (2013). “Network-centric quantum communications with application to critical infrastructure protection”.arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.0305

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Securequantumkeydistribution

    H.-K.Lo,M.Curty,andK.Tamaki(2014).“Securequantumkeydistribution”. NaturePhotonics,8: 8, 595–604

    2014

  5. [5]

    Recent advances on integrated quantum communications

    A. Orieux and E. Diamanti (2016). “Recent advances on integrated quantum communications”.Journal of Optics, 18: 8, 083002

    2016

  6. [6]

    Chip-based quantum key distribution

    P. Sibsonet al.(2017). “Chip-based quantum key distribution”.Nature Communications, 8: 1, 13984

    2017

  7. [7]

    On the genesis and evolution of integrated quantum optics

    S. Tanzilli, A. Martin, F. Kaiser, M. P. De Micheli, O. Alibart, and D. B. Ostrowsky (2012). “On the genesis and evolution of integrated quantum optics”.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 6: 1, 115–143

    2012

  8. [8]

    Reference-frame-independent quantum-key-distribution server with a telecom tether for an on-chip client

    P. Zhanget al.(2014). “Reference-frame-independent quantum-key-distribution server with a telecom tether for an on-chip client”.Physical Review Letters, 112: 13, 130501

    2014

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits

    A. Politi, M. J. Cryan, J. G. Rarity, S. Yu, and J. L. O’Brien (2008). “Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits”.Science, 320: 5876, 646–649

    2008

  2. [10]

    Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser

    K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, and K. Hirao (1996). “Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser”.Optics Letters, 21: 21, 1729–1731. 189

    1996

  3. [11]

    Torsional frequency mixing and sensing in optomechanical resonators

    J. G. Huanget al.(2017). “Torsional frequency mixing and sensing in optomechanical resonators”.Applied Physics Letters, 111: 11

    2017

  4. [12]

    Nanometer-precision linear sorting with synchronized optofluidic dual barriers

    Y. Shiet al.(2018). “Nanometer-precision linear sorting with synchronized optofluidic dual barriers”.Science Advances, 4: 1, p. eaao0773

    2018

  5. [13]

    Sculpting nanoparticle dynamics for single-bacteria-level screening and direct binding-efficiency measurement

    Y. Z. Shiet al. (2018). “Sculpting nanoparticle dynamics for single-bacteria-level screening and direct binding-efficiency measurement”.Nature Communications, 9: 1, 815

    2018

  6. [14]

    Securequantumkeydistributionover421kmofopticalfiber

    A.Boaron etal. (2018).“Securequantumkeydistributionover421kmofopticalfiber”. PhysicalReviewLetters , 121: 19, 190502

    2018

  7. [15]

    Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404 km optical fiber

    H.-L. Yinet al.(2016). “Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404 km optical fiber”.Physical Review Letters, 117: 19, 190501

    2016

  8. [16]

    Continuous variable quantum key distribution

    Y.-M. Li, X.-Y. Wang, Z.-L. Bai, W.-Y. Liu, S.-S. Yang, and K.-C. Peng (2017). “Continuous variable quantum key distribution”.Chinese Physics B, 26: 4, 040303

    2017

  9. [17]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard (2014). “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing”. Theoretical Computer Science, 560: 7–11

    2014

  10. [18]

    Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states

    C. H. Bennett (1992). “Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states”.Physical Review Letters, 68: 21, 3121

    1992

  11. [19]

    Quantum cryptography and Bell’s theorem

    A. K. Ekert (1991). “Quantum cryptography and Bell’s theorem”.Quantum Measurements in Optics, 413–418

    1991

  12. [20]

    Practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution with feasible optimization parameters

    L. Ma et al. (2023). “Practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution with feasible optimization parameters”.Science China Information Sciences,66: 8, 180507

    2023

  13. [21]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution over a 15 km multi-core fiber

    S. Sarmientoet al.(2022). “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution over a 15 km multi-core fiber”.New Journal of Physics, 24: 6, 063011

    2022

  14. [22]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution system: Past, present, and future

    Y. Zhang, Y. Bian, Z. Li, S. Yu, and H. Guo (2024). “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution system: Past, present, and future”.Applied Physics Reviews, 11: 1

    2024

  15. [23]

    Composable security for continuous variable quantum key distribution: Trust levels and practical key rates in wired and wireless networks

    S. Pirandola (2021). “Composable security for continuous variable quantum key distribution: Trust levels and practical key rates in wired and wireless networks”.Physical Review Research, 3: 4, 043014

    2021

  16. [24]

    Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution with entangled states

    N. Wang, S. Du, W. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Li, and K. Peng (2018). “Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution with entangled states”.Physical Review Applied, 10: 6, 064028

    2018

  17. [25]

    Gaussian quantum information

    C. Weedbrooket al.(2012). “Gaussian quantum information”.Reviews of Modern Physics, 84: 2, 621–669

    2012

  18. [26]

    Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond

    G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee (2014). “Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond”.Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 21: 01n02, 1440001

    2014

  19. [27]

    Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information

    A. Ferraro, S. Olivares, and M. G. Paris (2005). “Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information”. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0503237

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution secure against general attacks

    I. W. Primaatmaja, W. Y. Kon, and C. Lim (2024). “Discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution secure against general attacks”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02630

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Alshaer, T

    N. Alshaer, T. Ismail, and H. Mahmoud (2024). “Enhancing Performance of Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution (CV-QKD) and Gaussian Modulation of Coherent States (GMCS) in Free-Space Channels under Individual Attacks with Phase-Sensitive Amplifier (PSA) and Homodyne Det...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Security of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    S. Bäuml, C. Pascual-García, V. Wright, O. Fawzi, and A. Acín (2024). “Security of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.Quantum, 8: 1418

    2024

  23. [31]

    Securityofcontinuous-variablequantumkeydistribution against canonical attacks

    P.Papanastasiou,C.Ottaviani,andS.Pirandola(2021).“Securityofcontinuous-variablequantumkeydistribution against canonical attacks”, in2021 International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN): IEEE, 1–6

    2021

  24. [32]

    Composably secure data processing for Gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    A. G. Mountogiannakis, P. Papanastasiou, B. Braverman, and S. Pirandola (2022). “Composably secure data processing for Gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.Physical Review Research, 4: 1, 013099

    2022

  25. [33]

    Performance analysis of continuous-variable quantum key distribution using non-Gaussian states

    L. d. S. Aguiar, L. F. Borelli, J. A. Roversi, and A. Vidiella-Barranco (2022). “Performance analysis of continuous-variable quantum key distribution using non-Gaussian states”.Quantum Information Processing,21: 8, 304

    2022

  26. [34]

    Finite-size effects in continuous- variable quantum key distribution with Gaussian postselection

    N. Hosseinidehaj, A. M. Lance, T. Symul, N. Walk, and T. C. Ralph (2020). “Finite-size effects in continuous- variable quantum key distribution with Gaussian postselection”.Physical Review A, 101: 5, 052335

    2020

  27. [35]

    A survey of machine learning assisted continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    N. K. Long, R. Malaney, and K. J. Grant (2022). “A survey of machine learning assisted continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.Information, 14: 10, 553. 190

    2022

  28. [36]

    Machine learning aided carrier recovery in continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    H.-M. Chin, N. Jain, D. Zibar, U. L. Andersen, and T. Gehring (2021). “Machine learning aided carrier recovery in continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.npj Quantum Information, 7: 1, 20

    2021

  29. [37]

    High-rate discretely-modulated continuous- variable quantum key distribution using quantum machine learning

    Q. Liao, J. Liu, A. Huang, L. Huang, Z. Fei, and X. Fu (2023). “High-rate discretely-modulated continuous- variable quantum key distribution using quantum machine learning”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03283

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Theoretical development of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    W.-B. Liu, C.-L. Li, Z.-P. Liu, M.-G. Zhou, H.-L. Yin, and Z.-B. Chen (2022). “Theoretical development of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution”. (in English),Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology, Mini Review, 1: 985276, doi: 10.3389/frqst.2022.985276

    2022

  31. [39]

    Artificial key fingerprints for continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    Y. Yanet al.(2023). “Artificial key fingerprints for continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.Physical Review A, 108: 1, 012601, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.012601

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Machine-learning-based detection for quantum hacking attacks on continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution systems

    C. Ding, S. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Wu, J. Sun, and Y. Mao (2023). “Machine-learning-based detection for quantum hacking attacks on continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution systems”.Physical Review A, 107: 6, 062422, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062422

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Squeezed states of light

    D. F. Walls (1983). “Squeezed states of light”.Nature, 306: 5939, 141–146

    1983

  34. [42]

    Deterministic search on complete bipartite graphs by continuous time quantum walk

    H. Lin and Y. Shang (2024). “Deterministic search on complete bipartite graphs by continuous time quantum walk”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01640

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Entanglement formation in continuous-variable random quantum networks

    B. Zhang and Q. Zhuang (2021). “Entanglement formation in continuous-variable random quantum networks”. npj Quantum Information,7: 1, 33

    2021

  36. [44]

    Gaussianbosonsampling

    C.S.Hamilton,R.Kruse,L.Sansoni,S.Barkhofen,C.Silberhorn,andI.Jex(2017).“Gaussianbosonsampling”. Physical Review Letters, 119: 17, 170501

    2017

  37. [45]

    Quantum computational advantage using photons

    H.-S. Zhonget al.(2020). “Quantum computational advantage using photons”.Science, 370: 6523, 1460–1463

    2020

  38. [46]

    Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light

    H.-S. Zhonget al.(2021). “Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light”. Physical Review Letters, 127: 18, 180502

    2021

  39. [47]

    Quantum state tomography of photonic qubits with realistic coherent light sources

    A. Czerwinski (2024). “Quantum state tomography of photonic qubits with realistic coherent light sources”. Quantum Information & Computation, 24: 31–39

    2024

  40. [48]

    Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers

    R. Schnabel (2017). “Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers”.Physics Reports, 684: 1–51

    2017

  41. [49]

    Observation of squeezed light with 10–dB quantum-noise reduction

    H. Vahlbruchet al.(2008). “Observation of squeezed light with 10–dB quantum-noise reduction”.Physical Review Letters, 100: 3, 033602

    2008

  42. [50]

    Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel (2016). “Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency”.Physical Review Letters, 117: 11, 110801

    2016

  43. [51]

    State convertibility under genuinely incoherent operations

    S. Du and Z. Bai (2024). “State convertibility under genuinely incoherent operations”.Quantum Information & Computation, 24: 17–30

    2024

  44. [52]

    Microwave quantum illumination

    S. Barzanjeh, S. Guha, C. Weedbrook, D. Vitali, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Pirandola (2015). “Microwave quantum illumination”.Physical Review Letters, 114: 8, 080503

    2015

  45. [53]

    Observation of intensity squeezing in resonance fluorescence from a solid-state device

    H. Wanget al.(2020). “Observation of intensity squeezing in resonance fluorescence from a solid-state device”. Physical Review Letters, 125: 15, 153601

    2020

  46. [54]

    Hybrid encoder for discrete and continuous variable QKD

    M. Sabatini, T. Bertapelle, P. Villoresi, G. Vallone, and M. Avesani (2024), “Hybrid encoder for discrete and continuous variable QKD”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.17412

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Squeezed light

    R. Loudon and P. L. Knight (1987). “Squeezed light”.Journal of Modern Optics, 34: 6–7, 709–759

    1987

  48. [56]

    Squeezed light

    A. I. Lvovsky (2015). “Squeezed light”.Photonics: Scientific Foundations, Technology and Applications, 1: 121–163

    2015

  49. [57]

    B. E. Saleh and M. C. Teich (2019).Fundamentals of Photonics. John Wiley & Sons

    2019

  50. [58]

    Experimental quantum teleportation

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger (1997). “Experimental quantum teleportation”.Nature, 390: 6660, 575–579

    1997

  51. [59]

    An introduction to entanglement measures

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani (2005). “An introduction to entanglement measures”.arXiv preprint quant- ph/0504163

    2005

  52. [60]

    Possible teleportation of quantum states using squeezed sources and photonic integrated circuits

    M. Motaharifar, H. Kaatuzian, and M. Hasani (2023). “Possible teleportation of quantum states using squeezed sources and photonic integrated circuits”, in2023 5th Iranian International Conference on Microelectronics (IICM), IEEE, 227–232

    2023

  53. [61]

    On the squeezed number states and their phase space representations

    L. Albano, D. Mundarain, and J. Stephany (2002). “On the squeezed number states and their phase space representations”.Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, 4: 5, 352. 191

    2002

  54. [62]

    QuantumComputationandQuantumInformation .Cambridge University Press

    M.A.NielsenandI.L.Chuang(2010). QuantumComputationandQuantumInformation .Cambridge University Press

    2010

  55. [63]

    Mach-Zehnderinterferometercellforrealizationofquantumcomputer; a feasibility study

    M.MotaharifarandH.Kaatuzian(2023).“Mach-Zehnderinterferometercellforrealizationofquantumcomputer; a feasibility study”, in2023 31st International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). IEEE, 762–767

    2023

  56. [64]

    Novel ultra-short and ultra-broadband polarization beam splitter based on a bent directional coupler

    D. Dai and J. E. Bowers (2011). “Novel ultra-short and ultra-broadband polarization beam splitter based on a bent directional coupler”.Optics Express, 19: 19, 18614–18620

    2011

  57. [65]

    Realization of an ultra-short silicon polarization beam splitter with an asymmetrical bent directional coupler

    J. Wang, D. Liang, Y. Tang, D. Dai, and J. E. Bowers (2013). “Realization of an ultra-short silicon polarization beam splitter with an asymmetrical bent directional coupler”.Optics Letters, 38: 1, 4–6

    2013

  58. [66]

    Continuous variable quantum cryptography

    T. C. Ralph (1999). “Continuous variable quantum cryptography”.Physical Review A, 61: 1, 010303

    1999

  59. [67]

    Quantum cryptography with squeezed states

    M. Hillery (2000). “Quantum cryptography with squeezed states”.Physical Review A, 61: 2, 022309

    2000

  60. [68]

    Quantum cryptography with a predetermined key, using continuous-variable Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen correlations

    M. D. Reid (2000). “Quantum cryptography with a predetermined key, using continuous-variable Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen correlations”.Physical Review A, 62: 6, 062308

    2000

  61. [69]

    Quantum distribution of Gaussian keys using squeezed states

    N. J. Cerf, M. Levy, and G. Van Assche (2001). “Quantum distribution of Gaussian keys using squeezed states”. Physical Review A, 63: 5, 052311

    2001

  62. [70]

    Gottesman and J

    D. Gottesman and J. Preskill (2003).Quantum Information with Continuous Variables. Springer Dordrecht

    2003

  63. [71]

    Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states

    F. Grosshans and P. Grangier (2002). “Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states”. Physical Review Letters, 88: 5, 057902

    2002

  64. [72]

    Unconditionalsecurityproofoflong-distancecontinuous-variablequantum key distribution with discrete modulation

    A.LeverrierandP.Grangier(2009).“Unconditionalsecurityproofoflong-distancecontinuous-variablequantum key distribution with discrete modulation”.Physical Review Letters, 102: 18, 180504

    2009

  65. [73]

    Continuous variable quantum key distribution based on optical entangled states without signal modulation

    X. Su, W. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Jia, C. Xie, and K. Peng (2009). “Continuous variable quantum key distribution based on optical entangled states without signal modulation”.Europhysics Letters, 87: 2, 20005

    2009

  66. [74]

    Explicit asymptotic secret key rate of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an arbitrary modulation

    A. Denys, P. Brown, and A. Leverrier (2021). “Explicit asymptotic secret key rate of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an arbitrary modulation”.Quantum, 5: 540

    2021

  67. [75]

    Continuous variable quantum key distribution with modulated entangled states

    L. S. Madsen, V. C. Usenko, M. Lassen, R. Filip, and U. L. Andersen (2012). “Continuous variable quantum key distribution with modulated entangled states”.Nature Communications, 3: 1, 1083

    2012

  68. [76]

    Squeezed-state quantum key distribution upon imperfect reconciliation

    V. C. Usenko and R. Filip (2011). “Squeezed-state quantum key distribution upon imperfect reconciliation”. New Journal of Physics, 13: 11, 113007

    2011

  69. [77]

    Quantumcryptography without switching

    C.Weedbrook,A.M.Lance,W.P.Bowen,T.Symul,T.C.Ralph,andP.K.Lam(2004).“Quantumcryptography without switching”.Physical Review Letters,93: 17, 170504

    2004

  70. [78]

    No-switching quantum key distribution using broadband modulated coherent light

    A. M. Lance, T. Symul, V. Sharma, C. Weedbrook, T. C. Ralph, and P. K. Lam (2005). “No-switching quantum key distribution using broadband modulated coherent light”.Physical Review Letters, 95: 18, 80503

    2005

  71. [79]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols over noisy channels

    R. García-Patrón and N. J. Cerf (2009). “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols over noisy channels”.Physical Review Letters, 102: 13, 130501

    2009

  72. [80]

    Quantum key distribution over 25 km with an all-fiber continuous-variable system

    J. Lodewycket al.(2007). “Quantum key distribution over 25 km with an all-fiber continuous-variable system”. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 76: 4, 042305

    2007

  73. [81]

    Virtual entanglement and reconciliationprotocolsforquantumcryptographywithcontinuousvariables

    F. Grosshans, N. J. Cerf, J. Wenger, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier (2003). “Virtual entanglement and reconciliationprotocolsforquantumcryptographywithcontinuousvariables”. arXivpreprintquant-ph/0306141

    2003

  74. [82]

    Patterning-effect mitigating intensity modulator for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution

    G. Robertset al.(2018). “Patterning-effect mitigating intensity modulator for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution”.Optics Letters, 43: 20, 5110–5113

    2018

  75. [83]

    Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi (2012). “Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution”.Physical Review Letters, 108: 13, 130503, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503

    2012 doi

  76. [84]

    High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on multicore fiber using silicon photonic integrated circuits

    Y. Dinget al.(2017). “High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on multicore fiber using silicon photonic integrated circuits”.npj Quantum Information, 3: 1, 25

    2017

  77. [85]

    Silicon photonic transmitter for polarization-encoded quantum key distribution

    C. Maet al.(2016). “Silicon photonic transmitter for polarization-encoded quantum key distribution”.Optica, 3: 11, 1274–1278

    2016

  78. [86]

    Integrated silicon photonics for high-speed quantum key distribution

    P. Sibson, J. E. Kennard, S. Stanisic, C. Erven, J. L. O’Brien, and M. G. Thompson (2017). “Integrated silicon photonics for high-speed quantum key distribution”.Optica, 4: 2, 172–177

    2017

  79. [87]

    On-chip detection of non-classical light by scalable integration of single-photon detectors

    F. Najafiet al.(2015). “On-chip detection of non-classical light by scalable integration of single-photon detectors”.Nature Communications, 6: 1, 5873

    2015

  80. [88]

    High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits

    W. H. Perniceet al.(2012). “High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits”.Nature Communications, 3: 1, 1325

    2012

  81. [89]

    Towards on-chip continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    M. Ziebellet al.(2015). “Towards on-chip continuous-variable quantum key distribution”, inThe European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. Optica Publishing Group. 192

    2015

  82. [90]

    Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    P. Jouguet, S. Kunz-Jacques, A. Leverrier, P. Grangier, and E. Diamanti (2013). “Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.Nature Photonics, 7: 5, 378–381

    2013

  83. [91]

    Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution by controlling excess noise

    D. Huang, P. Huang, D. Lin, and G. Zeng (2016). “Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution by controlling excess noise”.Scientific Reports, 6: 1, 19201

    2016

  84. [92]

    A homodyne detector integrated onto a photonic chip for measuring quantum states and generating random numbers

    F. Raffaelliet al.(2018). “A homodyne detector integrated onto a photonic chip for measuring quantum states and generating random numbers”.Quantum Science and Technology, 3: 2, 025003

    2018

  85. [93]

    Interferometric photodetection in silicon photonics for phase diffusion quantum entropy sources

    M. Rudéet al.(2018). “Interferometric photodetection in silicon photonics for phase diffusion quantum entropy sources”.Optics Express, 26: 24, 31957–31964

    2018

  86. [94]

    Generation of random numbers by measuring phase fluctuations from a laser diode with a silicon-on-insulator chip

    F. Raffaelli, P. Sibson, J. E. Kennard, D. H. Mahler, M. G. Thompson, and J. C. Matthews (2018). “Generation of random numbers by measuring phase fluctuations from a laser diode with a silicon-on-insulator chip”.Optics Express, 26: 16, 19730–19741

    2018

  87. [95]

    Quantum entropy source on an InP photonic integrated circuit for random number generation

    C. Abellanet al.(2016). “Quantum entropy source on an InP photonic integrated circuit for random number generation”.Optica, 3: 9, 989–994

    2016

  88. [96]

    Hybrid and heterogeneous photonic integration

    P. Kaur, A. Boes, G. Ren, T. G. Nguyen, G. Roelkens, and A. Mitchell, (2021). “Hybrid and heterogeneous photonic integration”.APL Photonics, 6, 6

    2021

  89. [97]

    Composable free-space continuous-variable quantum key distribution using discrete modulation

    K. Jakschet al.(2024). “Composable free-space continuous-variable quantum key distribution using discrete modulation”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12915

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Hybrid external-cavity lasers (ECL) using photonic wire bonds as coupling elements

    Y. Xuet al.(2021). “Hybrid external-cavity lasers (ECL) using photonic wire bonds as coupling elements”. Scientific Reports, 11: 1, 16426

    2021

  91. [99]

    Photonicwirebonding: Anenablingtechnologyforheterogeneousmulti-chipintegration

    C.Koos etal. (2013).“Photonicwirebonding: Anenablingtechnologyforheterogeneousmulti-chipintegration”, in Integrated Photonics Research, Silicon and Nanophotonics. Optica Publishing Group

    2013

  92. [100]

    Stochastic mass-spring model for the generation of squeezed state of light

    M. Hasani, H. Kaatuzian, and M. Motaharifar, (2023). “Stochastic mass-spring model for the generation of squeezed state of light”, inLaser Science. Optica Publishing Group

    2023

  93. [101]

    Broadband amplitude squeezing at room temperature in electrically driven quantum dot lasers

    S. Zhaoet al.(2024). “Broadband amplitude squeezing at room temperature in electrically driven quantum dot lasers”.Physical Review Research, 6: 3, L032021

    2024

  94. [102]

    Experimental realization of spontaneous parametric down conversion

    M. Hasani and M. Motaharifar, (2024). “Experimental realization of spontaneous parametric down conversion”

    2024

  95. [103]

    Analysis of squeezed light generation via SFWM in a Si3N4 microring resonator

    M. Rabiei, H. Kaatuzian, M. Hasani, and A. Shircharandabi, (2024). “Analysis of squeezed light generation via SFWM in a Si3N4 microring resonator”, inFrontiers in Optics. Optica Publishing Group

    2024

  96. [104]

    Investigation of squeezed-state generation using SFWM in a SiO2 microring resonator

    A. Shircharandabi, H. Kaatuzian, M. Hasani, and M. Rabiei, (2024). “Investigation of squeezed-state generation using SFWM in a SiO2 microring resonator”, inLaser Science. Optica Publishing Group

    2024

  97. [105]

    Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement

    E. Enginet al.(2013). “Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement”. Optics Express, 21: 23, 27826–27834

    2013

  98. [106]

    Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip

    J. M. Arrazolaet al.(2021). “Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip”. Nature, 591: 7848, 54–60

    2021

  99. [107]

    Photonic boson sampling in a tunable circuit

    M. A. Broomeet al.(2013). “Photonic boson sampling in a tunable circuit”.Science, 339: 6121, 794–798

    2013

  100. [108]

    Revisiting the simulation of quantum Turing machines by quantum circuits

    A. Molina and J. Watrous, (2019). “Revisiting the simulation of quantum Turing machines by quantum circuits”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 475: 2226, 20180767

    2019

  101. [109]

    SimulationofContinuous-VariableQuantumSystemswithTensor Network

    R.Nagai,T.Tomono,andY.Minato, (2021).“SimulationofContinuous-VariableQuantumSystemswithTensor Network”. in2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE). IEEE, 437–438

    2021

  102. [110]

    An improved quantum network communication model based on compressed tensor network states

    Q. Zhang, H. Lai, J. Pieprzyk, and L. Pan, (2022). “An improved quantum network communication model based on compressed tensor network states”.Quantum Information Processing, 21: 7, 253

    2022

  103. [111]

    Quantum-key-expansion protocol based on number-state- entanglement-preserving tensor network with compression

    Q. Zhang, H. Lai, and J. Pieprzyk, (2022). “Quantum-key-expansion protocol based on number-state- entanglement-preserving tensor network with compression”.Physical Review A, 105: 3, 032439

    2022

  104. [112]

    Real-world two-photon interference and proof-of-principle quantum key distribution immune to detector attacks

    A. Rubenok, J. A. Slater, P. Chan, I. Lucio-Martinez, and W. Tittel, (2013). “Real-world two-photon interference and proof-of-principle quantum key distribution immune to detector attacks”.Physical Review Letters, 111: 13, 130501, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501

    2013 doi

  105. [113]

    Measurement-device–independent quantum secure direct communication: Direct quantum communication with imperfect measurement device and untrusted operator

    T. Li, Z. Gao, and Z. Li, (2020). “Measurement-device–independent quantum secure direct communication: Direct quantum communication with imperfect measurement device and untrusted operator”.Europhysics Letters, 131: 6, 60001

    2020

  106. [114]

    Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

    Y. Caoet al.(2020). “Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution”. Physical Review Letters, 125: 26, 260503. 193

    2020

  107. [115]

    Free-spaceandfiber-integratedmeasurement-device-independentquantumkeydistribution under high background noise

    Y.-H.Lietal. (2023).“Free-spaceandfiber-integratedmeasurement-device-independentquantumkeydistribution under high background noise”.Physical Review Letters, 131: 10, 100802

    2023

  108. [116]

    Chip-based measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using integrated silicon photonic systems

    L. Caoet al.(2020). “Chip-based measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using integrated silicon photonic systems”.Physical Review Applied, 14: 1, 011001

    2020

  109. [117]

    Dual-phase-modulated plug-and-play measurement-device- independent continuous-variable quantum key distribution

    Q. Liao, Y. Wang, D. Huang, and Y. Guo, (2018). “Dual-phase-modulated plug-and-play measurement-device- independent continuous-variable quantum key distribution”.Optics Express, 26: 16, 19907–19920

    2018

  110. [118]

    Advancesincontinuousvariablemeasurement-device-independentquantum key distribution

    P.Wang,Y.Tian,andY.Li,(2025).“Advancesincontinuousvariablemeasurement-device-independentquantum key distribution”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16448

    2025 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Continuous-variable measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution using squeezed states

    Y.-C. Zhang, Z. Li, S. Yu, W. Gu, X. Peng, and H. Guo, (2014). “Continuous-variable measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution using squeezed states”.Physical Review A,. 90: 5, 052325, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.052325

    2014 doi

  112. [120]

    Free-space continuous-variable quantum key distribution with imperfect detector against uniform fast-fading channels

    L. Fan, Y. Bian, Y. Zhang, and S. Yu, (2022). “Free-space continuous-variable quantum key distribution with imperfect detector against uniform fast-fading channels”.Symmetry, 14: 6, 1271. https://www.mdpi.com/2073- 8994/14/6/1271

    2022

  113. [121]

    Fading channel estimation for free-space continuous-variable secure quantum communication

    L. Ruppert et al. (2019). “Fading channel estimation for free-space continuous-variable secure quantum communication”.New Journal of Physics, 21: 12, 123036

    2019

  114. [122]

    Unidimensional continuous variable quantum key distribution under fast fading channel

    R. Zhao, J. Zhou, R. Shi, and J. Shi, (2024). “Unidimensional continuous variable quantum key distribution under fast fading channel”.Annalen der Physik, 536: 5, 2300401

    2024

  115. [123]

    Continuous-variable quantum secret sharing in fast-fluctuating channels

    F. Yang, D. Qiu, and P. Mateus, (2023). “Continuous-variable quantum secret sharing in fast-fluctuating channels”.IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 4: 1–9

    2023

  116. [124]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution in uniform fast-fading channels

    P. Papanastasiou, C. Weedbrook, and S. Pirandola, (2018). “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution in uniform fast-fading channels”.Physical Review A, 97: 3, 032311, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032311

    2018 doi

  117. [125]

    MDI-QKD: Continuous-versus discrete-variables at metropolitan distances

    S. Pirandolaet al.(2015). “MDI-QKD: Continuous-versus discrete-variables at metropolitan distances”.arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.06748

    2015 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using modulated squeezed states and optical amplifiers

    P. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Li, (2019). “Continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using modulated squeezed states and optical amplifiers”.Physical Review A, 99: 4, 042309, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042309

    2019 doi

  119. [127]

    Practical challenges in quantum key distribution

    E. Diamanti, H.-K. Lo, B. Qi, and Z. Yuan, (2016). “Practical challenges in quantum key distribution”.npj Quantum Information, 2: 1, 1–12

    2016

  120. [128]

    Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network

    C. M. Knautet al.(2024). “Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network”. Nature, 629: 8012, 573–578

    2024

  121. [129]

    Quantum communication with itinerant surface acoustic wave phonons

    É. Dumuret al.(2021). “Quantum communication with itinerant surface acoustic wave phonons”.npj Quantum Information, 7: 1, 173

    2021

  122. [130]

    Embedding entanglement generation within a measurement-feedback coherent Ising machine

    R. Yanagimoto, P. L. McMahon, E. Ng, T. Onodera, and H. Mabuchi, (2019). “Embedding entanglement generation within a measurement-feedback coherent Ising machine”.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04902

    2019 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Entanglement and quantum discord in optically coupled coherent Ising machines

    Y. Inui and Y. Yamamoto, (2020). “Entanglement and quantum discord in optically coupled coherent Ising machines”.Physical Review A,102: 6, 062419. 194

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.