Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 20 references

Unconventional superlattice ordering in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read V1/3NbS2 can be crystallized with ABC intercalant stacking, yielding a semimetallic noncollinear antiferromagnet instead of a metallic altermagnet.

desk verdict The R3c polytype is a real structural find, but the semimetal/spiral claim is weakened by a V-rich growth batch and an inferred magnetic structure. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22686 v1 pith:43DNEZ22 submitted 2025-06-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Shannon S. Fender , Noah Schnitzer , Wuzhang Fang , Lopa Bhatt , Dingbin Huang , Amani Malik , Oscar Gonzalez , Veronika Sunko
show 6 more authors
Lilia S. Xie David A. Muller Joseph Orenstein Yuan Ping Berit H. Goodge D. Kwabena Bediako
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords vanadium-intercalatedNbS2intercalatedtransitionmetaldichalcogenidessuperlatticeorderingABCstackingaltermagnetismnoncollinearantiferromagnet120-degreespinspiralanomalousHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$, a layered magnet previously known in a hexagonal P6322 structure, can also be grown in a trigonal R$\bar{3}$c structure in which the vanadium intercalant layers stack in an ABC sequence instead of the usual AB sequence. The authors argue that this out-of-plane stacking difference, not any change in the in-plane superlattice, is what flips the ground state from a metallic altermagnet with an anomalous Hall effect to a semimetallic antiferromagnet with roughly 10$^{19}$ holes per cubic centimeter and a proposed 120-degree spin spiral. If correct, the result makes the c-axis arrangement of intercalant ions a usable design knob for magnetism and electronic topology in the large family of intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides. It may also explain conflicting prior reports about the magnetic structure of V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$, since stacking faults with ABC order appear even in crystals that primarily adopt the conventional AB structure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structural object is the out-of-plane stacking sequence of the vanadium intercalant sheets: AB stacking in P6322 versus ABC stacking in R$\bar{3}$c, which triples the c axis (c ≈ 36.35 Å over six NbS$_2$ layers) while preserving the in-plane √3 × √3 superlattice. The identity that carries the argument is the correspondence between that stacking sequence and the magnetic space-group symmetries: A-type AFM order with C2z spin symmetry produces weak ferromagnetism and a symmetry-allowed anomalous Hall effect in P6322, whereas the same material with a k = (0,0,1/3) propagation vector and higher-order rotational spin symmetry is consistent only with a 120° spin spiral along c. The authors use this symmetry constraint, plus the absence of birefringence and AHE in R$\bar{3}$c, to fix the magnetic ground state even without a direct neutron refinement.

What would settle it

Neutron diffraction on a phase-pure R$\bar{3}$c single crystal and on a stoichiometrically matched P6322 crystal would settle it: if the R$\bar{3}$c ordered state is collinear A-type instead of a 120° spiral, or if an exactly 1:3 V:Nb R$\bar{3}$c crystal is metallic with an anomalous Hall effect, the stacking-driven picture fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$ is polymorphic in its intercalant stacking: the conventional P6322 structure has an AB sequence of vanadium layers, while a previously unisolated R$\bar{3}$c structure has a uniform ABC sequence with a tripled c axis over six NbS$_2$ layers. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction, atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM, Raman, and powder XRD all support the new structure. Magnetic susceptibility, heat capacity, transport, and optical birefringence then show that the two polytypes order magnetically near 45–50 K but in different ways: P6322 behaves as a weakly ferromagnetic, altermagnetic A-type antiferromagnet with a hysteretic anomalous Hall response, whereas R$\bar{3}$c shows no birefringence, no anomalous Hall effect, a hole density near 10$^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$, and a Fermi level close to the valence-band top, consistent with a noncollinear 120-degree spin spiral along c. The paper's conclusion is that out-of-plane intercalant periodicity is a previously underappreciated structural handle on the magnetic and electronic properties of intercalated TMDs.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the R$\bar{3}$c and P6322 crystals have essentially the same vanadium content and oxidation state, so the observed semimetal and spiral magnetism come from the ABC stacking rather than from a slightly vanadium-rich or V$^{2+}$-bearing composition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The R$\bar{3}$c polytype is a semimetal with hole carrier density around 10$^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$, about two orders of magnitude lower than the P6322 polytype, and with higher mobility (≈195 cm$^2$ V$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$).
  • The P6322 polytype shows a hysteretic anomalous Hall effect and low-temperature birefringence, both absent in R$\bar{3}$c, marking a clean experimental separation between altermagnetic and noncollinear antiferromagnetic behavior in the same compound.
  • The k = (0,0,1/3) neutron reflection reported in earlier V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$ studies may be explained by R$\bar{3}$c regions inside nominally P6322 crystals.
  • Growth stoichiometry (V:Nb ratio 1:3 versus 1.15:3) correlates with which polytype forms, suggesting that composition windows can select AB versus ABC intercalant order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ABC stacking rule transfers to other T$_x$MCh$_2$ intercalates, the c-axis intercalant registry becomes a general design axis, alongside the in-plane superlattice, for tuning spin textures and band topology.
  • The low carrier density of R$\bar{3}$c V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$ puts this polytype near the predicted topological semimetal regime in intercalated TMDs; angle-resolved photoemission on R$\bar{3}$c crystals would directly test whether the Fermi level sits at the predicted hole pocket at Γ.
  • Prior neutron data sets collected on mixed-phase crystals could be reanalyzed with a two-phase R$\bar{3}$c + P6322 model; observation of the k=(0,0,1/3) reflection tracking R$\bar{3}$c volume fraction would retroactively confirm the minority-phase explanation.
  • If the AB-to-ABC transition can be driven by pressure, strain, or electrochemical intercalation, the material could act as a switchable altermagnet/spiral-semimetal phase-change system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis and characterization of two polytypes of V1/3NbS2: the known P6322 structure with AB out-of-plane intercalant stacking and a newly isolated R3̄c structure with ABC stacking. Using SCXRD, HAADF-STEM, EDS, Raman, magnetometry, heat capacity, transport, and optical birefringence measurements, the authors show that the two polytypes have markedly different properties: P6322 is a metallic altermagnet with anomalous Hall effect, while R3̄c is proposed to be a semimetallic noncollinear antiferromagnet with a 120° spin spiral along c. The central structural claim—that R3̄c is a distinct, isolable polytype—is well supported by the diffraction and imaging data. However, the magnetic structure of R3̄c is inferred rather than directly measured, and the two polytypes were grown from different nominal stoichiometries, leaving open the possibility that composition, not stacking, drives the observed property differences.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper establishes out-of-plane intercalant stacking as a control parameter for magnetic and electronic properties in intercalated TMDs, with implications for altermagnet design and low-carrier-density topological phases. The structural identification of the R3̄c polytype is convincing and is supported by complementary probes: SCXRD refinement, atomic-resolution STEM imaging, and Raman spectroscopy. The paper also provides DFT calculations and a magnetic symmetry analysis (Table S5) that connect candidate magnetic configurations to the measured transport and optical signatures. The main weaknesses are that the 120° spiral is not directly determined and that the composition difference between the two growth batches is not fully ruled out as the cause of the observed property contrast. These issues are load-bearing for the abstract's claim that the R3̄c polytype 'is a semimetallic noncollinear antiferromagnet.'

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1e and synthesis paragraph (Batch II composition)] The R3̄c polytype was grown with a nominal V:Nb ratio of 1.15:3 versus 1:3 for P6322, and the EDS histogram in Fig. 1e shows that Batch II crystals are slightly V-rich. The Curie–Weiss effective moment for R3̄c (µeff = 3.46 µB/V, Fig. 2e) is closer to V2+ (3.87 µB) than to V3+ (2.83 µB), which the paper acknowledges but does not resolve. Because the central comparison attributes the semimetallic transport and noncollinear magnetism to ABC stacking, the possibility that the higher V content or a different V oxidation state in Batch II independently produces these properties must be ruled out. Please provide per-crystal composition from the same crystals used in transport and magnetization (e.g., SCXRD refined site occupancies or WDS) and, if possible, a bulk-sensitive probe of the V valence; surface XPS (Fig. S4) is insufficient.
  2. [Fig. 3d and 'To disambiguate the magnetic structure...' paragraph] The 120° spin spiral is not directly measured. The propagation vector k=(0,0,1/3) is taken from prior neutron diffraction on crystals that were not shown to be R3̄c (Ref. 15), and the absence of birefringence only excludes spin configurations with C2 rotational symmetry; the text itself notes that configurations with higher-order Cnz symmetries remain allowed. The statement that these observations are 'only consistent with a 120º spin-spiral along c' is therefore too strong. A direct magnetic structure determination on R3̄c crystals (neutron or resonant X-ray scattering) is needed, or the conclusion should be explicitly framed as one of several candidate configurations consistent with the data.
  3. [Abstract and conclusion (also Fig. 3a–c)] The abstract states as established that the new superlattice 'is a semimetallic noncollinear antiferromagnet,' but the transport data support a more limited claim. The Hall carrier density is ~10^19 cm^-3 and the resistivity shows a crossover near 250 K, which the text itself describes as 'suggest[ing] a Fermi level very close to the top of the valence band near a band gap.' A low-carrier metal or a lightly doped semiconductor would also be consistent. Please rephrase the abstract and conclusion to match the evidence, e.g., 'low-carrier-density metal with proposed noncollinear antiferromagnetic order,' unless additional measurements (e.g., optical conductivity or quantum oscillations) establish a true semimetallic ground state.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2a inset and caption] The heat capacity is said to be 'normalized to the formula VNb3S6' in the caption while the text discusses values per mol V; please make the normalization consistent and define the units in the figure.
  2. [Fig. 3c] The y-axes multiply nH by 10^21 and 10^19 for the two panels, which is confusing; either plot nH directly or state the multiplier clearly in the axis label and caption.
  3. [Throughout] The notation R3"c (with a quotation mark) should be typeset as R3̄c (R3 bar c) for consistency with crystallographic conventions.
  4. [Raman discussion after Fig. 1f] The new Raman modes at 370–400 cm^-1 in R3̄c are not assigned; since the larger unit cell (Z=3 relative to P6322) is expected to give additional zone-center modes, a brief assignment or reference would strengthen the structural interpretation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor circularity: the same prior k=(0,0,1/3) neutron reflection is used both as a structural fingerprint of the new R3c polytype and as the magnetic propagation vector said to force a 120 degree spiral; the structural discovery itself rests on independent SCXRD/STEM evidence and is not circular.

  1. other [Main text, paragraph beginning 'To disambiguate the magnetic structure of the R3c polytype' (Figures 3d/4 discussion).]
    "Recognizing the existence of this R3c structure now provides an explanation for the out-of-plane periodicity if some crystals contained a substantial fraction of R3c; in this work, it serves as means to further delimit possible noncollinear magnetic configurations. This propagation vector, which implies ferromagnetic order in ab, along with the absence of AHE and birefringence, is only consistent with a 120 deg spin-spiral along c (Figure 4c)."

    The prior neutron reflection k=(0,0,1/3) is used twice. First, the paper explains it as the structural fingerprint of the R3c superlattice contaminating earlier P6322 samples ('provides an explanation for the out-of-plane periodicity'). Then it is re-used as the magnetic propagation vector that, with no AHE and no birefringence, 'is only consistent with a 120 deg spin-spiral along c'. If the reflection is structural (R3c c-axis tripling), it carries no spin-order information and the spiral claim has no independent magnetic input; if it is magnetic, the structural explanation of the prior P6322 data is moot. No fresh neutron data on the actual R3c crystals are presented, so the spiral's only propagation constraint is a datum the paper redefines as structural.

full rationale

The central structural claim — that V1/3NbS2 can adopt an R3c superlattice with ABC out-of-plane intercalant stacking — is derived from direct diffraction and imaging (SCXRD refinement to R3c with c = 36.349 Å; HAADF-STEM showing extensive ABC ordering; powder XRD; distinct Raman modes). None of these reduces to the paper's conclusions, so the structural discovery is non-circular. Self-citations (refs 9, 14, 32, 35) are used for general altermagnetism context, the empirical statement that intercalant superlattices shape magnetic interactions, the birefringence interpretation framework (previously validated on EuCd2P2), and speculative future directions; none is load-bearing for the new claims. The electronic and magnetic property comparisons are direct measurements (AHE present vs absent; nH about 10^21 vs 10^19 cm^-3); the Hall carrier density is a fitted parameter but is reported as a measurement, not as a prediction. The one genuine circular step is the dual use of the prior k=(0,0,1/3) neutron reflection: the paper absorbs it into the R3c structural explanation and then reuses it as the magnetic propagation vector that makes the 120 degree spiral 'only consistent' with the data. This weakens the magnetic-structure proposal but does not affect the structural identification. The V-rich composition of Batch II (1.15:3:6), the R3c Curie-Weiss moment of 3.46 uB/V (nearer V2+ than V3+), and the absence of a direct neutron determination of the R3c magnetic structure are disclosed in the paper; these are correctness and confounding risks for the 'out-of-plane stacking controls the ground state' conclusion, not circularity. Overall: one minor evidential conflation; the central derivation chain is independent. Score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central structural claim relies on direct probes, but the property comparison leans on unverified assumptions about phase purity, composition, and the applicability of prior neutron data. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The R3̄c crystals used in magnetic, thermal, and transport measurements are single-phase and representative of the SCXRD-refined structure.
    Crystals were pre-selected by EDS composition closest to x=1/3 and Raman signature (Figure 1f), but no per-crystal SCXRD is shown for the measured crystals; Batch II has higher average V content (Figure 1e).
  • domain assumption The (0,0,1/3) propagation vector from earlier neutron diffraction constrains the R3̄c magnetic order and implies ferromagnetic coupling in the ab plane.
    The paper simultaneously suggests this reflection may be a structural artifact of R3̄c domains (explaining the out-of-plane periodicity), yet uses it as a magnetic constraint; see section 3 discussion of prior neutron studies.
  • domain assumption Vanadium is in the 3+ oxidation state in both polytypes, giving the expected 2.83 µB effective moment.
    The R3̄c phase yields 3.46 µB/V, closer to V2+; XPS is stated to look similar for the polytypes but is surface-sensitive. The property comparison assumes the same electron count per V.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unconventional superlattice ordering in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43DNEZ22

@misc{pith2026250622686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unconventional superlattice ordering in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide V$_1/3$NbS$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43DNEZ22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22686}
}
abstract

The interplay between symmetry and topology in magnetic materials makes it possible to engineer exotic phases and technologically useful properties. A key requirement for these pursuits is achieving control over local crystallographic and magnetic structure, usually through sample morphology (such as synthesis of bulk crystals versus thin-films) and application of magnetic or electric fields. Here we show that V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$ can be crystallized in two ordered superlattices, distinguished by the periodicity of out-of-plane magnetic intercalants. Whereas one of these structures is metallic and displays the hallmarks of altermagnetism, the other superlattice, which has not been isolated before in this family of intercalation compounds, is a semimetallic noncollinear antiferromagnet that may enable access to topologically nontrivial properties. This observation of an unconventional superlattice structure establishes a powerful route for tailoring the tremendous array of magnetic and electronic behaviors hosted in related materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22686 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. f. The set of peaks appearing in the low-frequency regime (160–210 cm–1) comprises the characteristic excita￾tions of √3 × √3 intercalant superlattice order.20 However, the spectrum for the R3"c material is distinguished by new modes that appear between 370 cm–1 and 400 cm–1, with sharper spectral features overall. To compare the magnetic properties of P6322 and R3"c structures of V1/3NbS2, we select crystals that e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Measurements of V1/3NbS2 in P6322 (a–c) and R3"c (d-f) structures. a,d) Magnetic susceptibility (𝜒M) as a function of temperature, T. Inset: Heat capacity (Cp/T vs. T) normalized to the formula VNb3S6. b,e) 1/𝜒M(T), fitted to Curie–Weiss law. c,f) Magnetization, M, as a function of field, H. 0 100 200 300 T (K) 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 χ m ( emu / ( mol V * Oe ) ) 0 100 200 300 T (K) 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) T-dependent longitudinal resistivity (⍴xx) of P6322 and R3"c single crystals. b) Hall resistivity (⍴xy) as a function of H at 2 K. c) T dependence of carrier concentrations (nH) for P6322 and R3"c. d) Normalized, thermally-modulated optical reflectivity, 𝑅"T, (top) and birefringence, 𝐵"T, (bottom) of P6322 and R3"c. a b ρxy ( μΩ cm ) R3c P63 Vxx 22 Vxy H || c 0.0 0.5 -0.5 -5 0 5 -0.2 0.0 0.2 H (T) -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Coordinates for magnetic space group analysis of P6322 and R3"c V1/3NbS2 single crystals. b) A-type AFM mag￾netic structure for P6322 V1/3NbS2. c) Proposed 120° spin spiral structure for R3"c V1/3NbS2. y x b a c a c b A-type AFM / AM 120º spin spiral a b c a b c P63…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    0] direction. c) Two views of crystal structure of V1/3NbS2 in a R3

    a) Two views of the crystal structure of V1/3NbS2 in a P6322 space group. b) HAADF-STEM image of a P6322 crystal projected along the [101"0] direction. c) Two views of crystal structure of V1/3NbS2 in a R3"c space group. d) HAADF-STEM of a R3"c crystal along [101"0]. In b and d, schematic overlays in the left panels illustrate AB and ABC intercalant arran...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (17), 174431. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.174431. (16) Lawrence, E. A.; Huai, X.; Kim, D.; Avdeev, M.; Chen, Y.; Skorupskii, G.; Miura, A.; Ferrenti, A.; Waibel, M.; Kawagu-chi, S.; Ng, N.; Kaman, B.; Cai, Z.; Schoop, L.; Kushwaha, S.; Liu, F.; Tran, T. T.; Ji, H. Fe Site Order and Magnetic Properties of Fe 1/4 NbS

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.174431 2021

  3. [4]

    c V1/3NbS2 single crystals. b) A-type AFM mag-netic structure for P6322 V1/3NbS2. c) Proposed 120° spin spiral structure for R3

    a) Coordinates for magnetic space group analysis of P6322 and R3"c V1/3NbS2 single crystals. b) A-type AFM mag-netic structure for P6322 V1/3NbS2. c) Proposed 120° spin spiral structure for R3"c V1/3NbS2. y x b a c a c b 120º spin spiralA-type AFM / AM ba c ba c P6322 R3c manipulate the magnetism in intercalation compounds. The potential for a reversible ...

    work page 2024

  4. [5]

    Non-relativistic spin splitting in compensated magnets that are not altermagnets

    https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2402.14321. (6) Šmejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12 (4), 040501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501. (7) Šmejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Cryst...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14321 2022

  5. [8]

    Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62 (44), 18179–18188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorg-chem.3c02652. (17) Graham, J. N.; Hicken, T. J.; Regmi, R. B.; Janoschek, M.; Mazin, I.; Luetkens, H.; Ghimire, N. J.; Guguchia, Z. Local Probe Evidence Supporting Altermagnetism in Co$_{1/4}$NbSe$_2$. arXiv

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.inorg-chem.3c02652 2023

  6. [10]

    Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110 (14), 144420. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.144420. (19) Ray, M. K.; Fu, M.; Chen, Y.; Chen, T.; Nomoto, T.; Sakai, S.; Kitatani, M.; Hirayama, M.; Imajo, S.; Tomita, T.; Sakai, A.; Nishio-Hamane, D.; McCandless, G. T.; Suzuki, M.-T.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Fennell, T.; Kohama, Y.; Chan, J. Y.; Arita, R.; Broholm, C.; Nakatsuji, S...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.144420 2024

  7. [12]

    Staggered Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya inducing weak ferromagnetism in centrosymmetric altermagnets and weak ferrimagnetism in noncentrosymmetric altermagnets

    http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07678 (ac-cessed 2024-03-24). (23) Krempaský, J.; Šmejkal, L.; D’Souza, S. W.; Hajlaoui, M.; Springholz, G.; Uhlířová, K.; Alarab, F.; Constantinou, P. C.; Strocov, V.; Usanov, D.; Pudelko, W. R.; González-Hernán-dez, R.; Birk Hellenes, A.; Jansa, Z.; Reichlová, H.; Šobáň, Z.; Gonzalez Betancourt, R. D.; Wadley, P.; Sinova, J.; K...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [13]

    2024, 11 (3), 035025

    2D Mater. 2024, 11 (3), 035025. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ad4c73. (25) Uchiyama, T.; Goto, H.; Uesugi, E.; Takai, A.; Zhi, L.; Miura, A.; Hamao, S.; Eguchi, R.; Ota, H.; Sugimoto, K.; Fujiwara, A.; Matsui, F.; Kimura, K.; Hayashi, K.; Ueno, T.; Koba-yashi, K.; Akimitsu, J.; Kubozono, Y. Semiconductor–Metal Transition in Bi2Se3 Caused by Impurity D...

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ad4c73 2024

Show all 20 references
  1. [17]

    Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107 (14), 144404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.144404. (33) Lu, K.; Sapkota, D.; DeBeer-Schmitt, L.; Wu, Y.; Cao, H. B.; Mannella, N.; Mandrus, D.; Aczel, A. A.; MacDougall, G. J. Canted Antiferromagnetic Order in the Monoaxial Chiral Magnets V 1 / 3...

    2023 doi

  2. [18]

    Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4 (5), 054416. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.054416. (34) Klein, R. A.; Walsh, J. P. S.; Clarke, S. M.; Liu, Z.; Alp, E. E.; Bi, W.; Meng, Y.; Altman, A. B.; Chow, P.; Xiao, Y.; Norman, M. R.; Rondinelli, J. M.; Jacobsen, S. D.; Puggioni, D...

    2020 doi

  3. [20]

    (37) Inoshita, T.; Hirayama, M.; Hamada, N.; Hosono, H.; Mura-kami, S

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.04590. (37) Inoshita, T.; Hirayama, M.; Hamada, N.; Hosono, H.; Mura-kami, S. Topological Semimetal Phases Manifested in Tran-sition Metal Dichalcogenides Intercalated with 3 d Metals. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100 (12), 121112. https://doi.org/10....

    doi arXiv

  4. [25]

    (2) Bai, L.; Feng, W.; Liu, S.; Šmejkal, L.; Mokrousov, Y.; Yao, Y

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s44306-024-00029-0. (2) Bai, L.; Feng, W.; Liu, S.; Šmejkal, L.; Mokrousov, Y.; Yao, Y. Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics. arXiv

    doi

  5. [537]

    (26) Ashcroft, N

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27701-5. (26) Ashcroft, N. W.; Mermin, N. D. Solid State Physics; Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York,

    doi

  6. [1976]

    Overview and Advances in a Layered Chiral Helimagnet Cr1/3NbS2

    (27) Cao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Yin, Y.; Xie, H.; Liu, B.; Wang, W.; Zhu, C.; Mandrus, D.; Wang, L.; Huang, W. Overview and Advances in a Layered Chiral Helimagnet Cr1/3NbS2. Mater. Today Adv. 2020, 7, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100080. (28) Šmejkal, L.; González-He...

    2020

  7. [2023]

    (12) Di Salvo, F

    https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2306.09413. (12) Di Salvo, F. J.; Hull, G. W.; Schwartz, L. H.; Voorhoeve, J. M.; Waszczak, J. V. Metal Intercalation Compounds of TaS2: Preparation and Properties. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59 (4), 1922–1929. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1680277. (13) A...

    1973 doi arXiv

  8. [2024]

    (3) Bhatti, S.; Sbiaa, R.; Hirohata, A.; Ohno, H.; Fukami, S.; Piramanayagam, S

    https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2406.02123. (3) Bhatti, S.; Sbiaa, R.; Hirohata, A.; Ohno, H.; Fukami, S.; Piramanayagam, S. N. Spintronics Based Random Access Memory: A Review. Mater. Today 2017, 20 (9), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007. (4) Yuan, L.-D.; W...

    2017 doi arXiv

  9. [2025]

    (18) Mandujano, H

    https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.09193. (18) Mandujano, H. C.; Salas, G. S.; Li, T.; Zavalij, P. Y.; Manjón-Sanz, A.; Butch, N. P.; Rodriguez, E. E. Itinerant A -Type Antiferromagnetic Order in Co 1 / 4 TaSe

    doi arXiv

  10. [3532]

    (20) Fan, S.; Neal, S.; Won, C.; Kim, J.; Sapkota, D.; Huang, F.; Yang, J.; Mandrus, D

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58476-0. (20) Fan, S.; Neal, S.; Won, C.; Kim, J.; Sapkota, D.; Huang, F.; Yang, J.; Mandrus, D. G.; Cheong, S.-W.; Haraldsen, J. T.; Musfeldt, J. L. Excitations of Intercalated Metal Monolayers in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett....

    doi

  11. [4961]

    (30) Šmejkal, L.; MacDonald, A

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48493-w. (30) Šmejkal, L.; MacDonald, A. H.; Sinova, J.; Nakatsuji, S.; Jungwirth, T. Anomalous Hall Antiferromagnets. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7 (6), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00430-3. (31) Stokes, H. T.; Hatch, D. M. FINDSYM...

    2022 doi

  12. [6031]

    (36) Ghosh, S.; Lygouras, C.; Feng, Z.; Fu, M.; Nakatsuji, S.; Drichko, N

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41780-y. (36) Ghosh, S.; Lygouras, C.; Feng, Z.; Fu, M.; Nakatsuji, S.; Drichko, N. Raman Spectroscopic Evidence for Linearly Dis-persed Nodes and Magnetic Ordering in the Topological Semimetal V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$. arXiv April 6,

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.