Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 117 references

Polar alignment of a circumbinary disc around a brown dwarf binary

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a primordial misaligned circumbinary disc around the brown dwarf binary 2M1510 AB can evolve into a polar configuration within a typical disc lifetime, which would make the suspected polar planet around it a…

desk verdict A sound but incremental application of established polar-alignment theory to a brown dwarf binary; the simulation is a proof-of-concept that does not directly test the low-viscosity, extended-disc timescales the paper advertises. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22747 v1 pith:OILEWYEO submitted 2025-06-28 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Jeremy L. Smallwood , Thomas A. Baycroft , Amaury H.M.J. Triaud , Richard P. Nelson This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords circumbinarydiscpolaralignmentbrowndwarfbinary2M1510ABplanetformationKozai–Lidovhydrodynamicalsimulationtimescale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the suspected polar circumbinary planet around the brown dwarf binary 2M1510 AB could have formed where it orbits, rather than arriving by scattering. Its answer is yes, provided the primordial disc was initially tilted by at least roughly 50 degrees and stayed a coherent disc while it aligned. The authors derive polar-alignment timescales and a critical tilt angle, then confirm with a hydrodynamical simulation that an initially 75-degree-inclined disc evolves toward the polar state. They also show that the outer stellar companion does not disrupt the alignment, and that the scarcity of known polar circumbinary planets is consistent with observational selection effects. If correct, this gives the first concrete formation pathway for a polar circumbinary planet around a brown dwarf binary.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the torque from the eccentric binary acting on a misaligned gas disc, which drives precession and, for sufficiently large initial tilts, polar alignment. The argument is carried by two analytical formulas: the polar-alignment timescale $\tau_{\rm polar} = (1/\alpha)(H/r)^2 \Omega_b/\Omega_d^2$, with the disc precession frequency $\Omega_d$ given by a mass-weighted average over the disc, and a two-regime critical tilt $i_{\rm crit}$ that separates coplanar from polar alignment. The hydrodynamical simulation acts as a proof-of-concept that a 75-degree-tilted disc around the 2M1510 AB binary evolves toward the polar state without breaking.

What would settle it

A hydrodynamical simulation of the same 2M1510 AB binary parameters but with an outer disc radius extending well beyond 10 binary separations into the regime where the disc is predicted to break or tear, and that fails to reach a polar state before the disc disperses, would directly falsify the claim that a primordial disc aligns as a coherent body. Alternatively, direct imaging of a young brown dwarf binary showing a circumbinary disc with initial tilt above the critical angle that remains coplanar or misaligned after the predicted alignment time would contradict the timescale calculation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a circumbinary disc around a low-mass, moderately eccentric brown dwarf binary such as 2M1510 AB can achieve polar alignment within the disc's lifetime. The authors compute alignment timescales from linear warp-dissipation theory, identify an analytical critical tilt angle that separates coplanar from polar alignment, and verify the behavior with a smoothed-particle hydrodynamics simulation of an initially 75-degree-inclined disc. They find that discs around brown dwarf binaries align more slowly than discs around more massive binaries, but that with suitable parameters (viscosity $\alpha = 10^{-4}$, aspect ratio $H/r = 0.05$, outer radius up to roughly $100$ binary separations) alignment can still finish before the disc disperses. The paper concludes that the suspected polar planet around 2M1510 AB could have formed in place from such an aligned disc, and that the lack of other polar circumbinary planets is consistent with detection biases rather than with the process being impossible.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument assumes the disc stays a single, coherent, rigidly precessing structure for the entire alignment, so that one global precession frequency (a mass-weighted average) describes it; if the disc breaks into mutually misaligned rings before aligning, the timescales and the polar-state conclusion do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For 2M1510 AB, a disc with $\alpha = 10^{-4}$, $H/r = 0.05$, and an outer radius out to roughly $100\,a_b$ can reach polar alignment within a typical 1–10 Myr disc lifetime, making in-situ formation of the suspected polar planet plausible.
  • Polar alignment around brown dwarf binaries takes longer than around more massive binaries, so among brown dwarf systems only those with favorable disc properties (moderately compact, viscous, thin) are expected to produce polar planets before the disc disperses.
  • The near-polar companion to VHS 1256 AB is unlikely to have formed from a polar-aligning disc within the disc lifetime; the paper argues a scattering origin or a primordially near-polar disc is more likely.
  • The outer companion 2M1510 C does not destabilize the polar alignment of a compact primordial disc, and most circumbinary orbits remain stable against von Zeipel–Kozai–Lidov oscillations over the system's roughly 45 Myr age.
  • The known absence of polar circumbinary planets is consistent with observational selection: transiting circumbinary searches favor coplanar configurations, and radial-velocity samples are dominated by low-eccentricity binaries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the alignment timescale scales inversely with binary mass and increases with binary separation, the model implies that the most promising targets for finding polar circumbinary planets are young, tight, eccentric, near-equal-mass binaries; this is an observational consequence not explored in the paper.
  • A testable extension: if the suspected planet around 2M1510 AB is confirmed and its orbit is measured, it should lie close to the plane perpendicular to the binary's orbital plane and aligned with the binary's eccentricity vector, matching the polar state the disc reached before it dispersed.
  • The paper's reliance on a coherent disc suggests that more massive discs (higher disc-to-binary angular momentum ratio) may align to a different critical tilt near 40 degrees; whether massive discs remain coherent long enough is an open question the authors do not address.
  • The detection-bias argument implies that a dedicated search for retrograde apsidal precession in binaries with eccentricity around 0.4 could uncover more polar circumbinary planets, providing a direct test of whether the 2M1510 configuration is rare or just rarely seen.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies whether a primordial misaligned circumbinary disc around the brown dwarf binary 2M1510 AB can evolve into a polar configuration within the disc lifetime, motivated by the suspected polar circumbinary planet 2M1510 (AB)b. The authors use the analytical polar-alignment timescale and critical-tilt expressions of Martin & Lubow (2017, 2019), evaluate them for the observed binary parameters, and present one smoothed-particle-hydrodynamics simulation of an initially 75°-tilted disc around 2M1510 AB. They report that the disc evolves toward polar alignment and conclude that a primordial disc with sufficient initial misalignment and suitable viscosity and aspect ratio could have polar-aligned within 1–10 Myr, yielding favorable conditions for forming a polar planet. The paper also discusses the effect of the outer companion 2M1510 C, proposes a modified empirical disc-radius relation for low-mass objects, and speculates on why polar circumbinary systems have not been found more widely.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would offer a plausible in-situ formation pathway for the suspected polar circumbinary planet around 2M1510 AB, and would extend the theory of polar disc alignment from stellar binaries to brown-dwarf binaries. The analytical framework is imported from prior published work, which is appropriate as an external benchmark; the new hydrodynamical simulation provides an independent numerical test, although its parameter regime differs from the analytical fiducial case. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions about the parameter combinations (viscosity α≈1e-4, H/r≈0.05, r_out≲100 a_b, initial tilt ≳50°) required for polar alignment in low-mass systems. A strength of the manuscript is that it grounds the calculation in the observed parameters of 2M1510 AB (Triaud et al. 2020; Baycroft et al. 2025), but the support for the specific application to that system is weakened by a disc-size inconsistency and by the absence of a convergence study for the simulation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Section 3.2] The hydrodynamical simulation that is presented as confirmation of the polar-alignment scenario adopts α_SS = 0.005 and r_out = 10 a_b (Section 3.1), whereas the analytical timescales highlighted for 2M1510 AB use α = 1e-4 and r_out up to 100 a_b (Figure 2; Section 5). Because Eq. (1) scales as τ_polar ∝ 1/α, the simulated alignment proceeds roughly fifty times faster than in the fiducial analytical case, everything else being equal. The simulation therefore demonstrates that a relatively viscous, narrow disc can polar-align, but it does not by itself confirm that the α = 1e-4, r_out ≈ 100 a_b parameter combination aligns within a typical disc lifetime. The abstract's statement that 'A hydrodynamical simulation confirms that an initially inclined disc ... evolves towards a polar state' should be tempered, or supplemented by a simulation in the fiducial regime (or by an explicit argument explaining why the α-dependence in Eq. (1) can be safely extrapolated).
  2. [Section 4.1 and Section 4.2] There is an inconsistency between the inferred disc size for 2M1510 AB and the region of Figure 2 used to claim alignment within the disc lifetime. Applying Eq. (9) gives r_out,dust ≈ 15 au, and the authors then infer a gas-disc outer edge of ~30 au (Section 4.1); for a_b = 0.06 au, this corresponds to roughly 250–500 a_b. Yet Section 4.2 states that 'a disc within ~100 a_b around 2M1510 AB is expected to align polar within its lifetime,' and Figure 2 extends only to r_out = 100 a_b. The timescale in Eq. (1) grows with r_out through Eq. (3), so the authors' own disc-size estimate places 2M1510 AB well outside the parameter range for which alignment within 1–10 Myr is demonstrated. The central conclusion that a primordial disc around 2M1510 AB could polar-align before dispersal is therefore not supported for the disc size the authors themselves adopt; a calculation of τ_polar at the inferred r_out, or a revised estimate of the primordial disc size, is needed.
  3. [Section 3.1] No resolution or convergence study is presented for the SPH simulation. The single run uses 10^6 particles, and the Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity is implemented through the artificial-viscosity prescription with an average smoothing length per scale height ⟨h⟩/H = 0.34. The reliability of the simulated alignment timescale and the statement that the disc does not break depend on the numerical viscosity being converged and on the warp being spatially resolved. Without a higher- or lower-resolution test, the hydrodynamical evidence is only qualitative. A resolution study, or at least a discussion of the known resolution sensitivity of SPH warp simulations, should be added.
  4. [Section 4.1, Eq. (9)] The modified disc-radius relation in Eq. (9) introduces parameters β and λ that are never assigned numerical values in the text, so the plotted curve in Figure 6 and the inferred r_out ≈ 15 au for 2M1510 AB are not reproducible. This estimate is load-bearing for the argument that vZKL oscillations are quenched (Figure 5) and for the disc-size calculation discussed in the previous comment. The authors should state the adopted values of β and λ and explain how they were calibrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1] The text says the particles are distributed 'from the inner disc radius, r_out = 0.12 au ... to the outer disc radius, r_out = 0.6 au'; the first occurrence should presumably be r_in, not r_out.
  2. [Equations (8)-(9) and throughout] The symbol α is used both for the Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity parameter and for the power-law index in the disc-radius relation, which is confusing; please use a different symbol (e.g., γ) for the radius exponent.
  3. [Abstract and Section 2] The abstract states that the critical tilt converges to the Kozai-Lidov threshold of ~39°, while Section 2 and Figure 3 report a limiting value near 40°; these numbers should be made consistent.
  4. [Figure 2 caption] The caption should state explicitly that the ordinate is τ_polar in years and should identify the unit of the horizontal axis (r_out/a_b), as the current prose is ambiguous without the figure.
  5. [Introduction and Conclusions] There are several typographical errors in the prose, such as 'more rapidity' and 'the efficient of alignment is in influences' in the concluding paragraph; a careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analytic alignment formalism is imported from independent prior work, and the SPH simulation is a separate numerical test of that formalism.

full rationale

The paper's central timescale relation (Eq. 1) and precession frequency (Eq. 2) are quoted from published linear-warp theory, with Eq. (2) citing Lubow & Martin (2018) and Smallwood et al. (2019), and the critical tilt expression Eq. (4) is taken from Martin & Lubow (2019). These are external results used as inputs, not outputs of this paper, and they are not redefined in terms of the target quantities. The hydrodynamical simulation is an independent Phantom calculation with its own initial conditions (i = 75 degrees, alpha_SS = 0.005, r_out = 10 a_b); it is not constructed by imposing the analytic polar-alignment solution, and the fact that the initial tilt lies above the imported critical angle is the intended test, not a circular definition. The only fitted component is the empirical disc-radius relation Eq. (9), which is explicitly labelled an adopted modification of literature scalings and is used to estimate the radial extent of the 2M1510 disc for the vZKL discussion rather than to define the polar-alignment claim. Self-citations to Smallwood et al. appear in contextual statements about polar planet formation and prior precession-frequency results, but the core derivation does not reduce to those citations; Eq. (2)'s origin is the independent Lubow & Martin (2018) result. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness argument is imported from the authors' own prior work, and no known result is merely relabelled. Discrepancies between the analytic fiducial parameters (alpha = 1e-4, r_out up to 100 a_b) and the simulation parameters (alpha = 0.005, r_out = 10 a_b), and the untested assumption of coherent disc precession in the low-viscosity regime, are legitimate extrapolation and robustness concerns, but they are not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on prior analytical theory of polar alignment, one SPH calculation with favorable parameters, and empirical extrapolations for disc sizes. No new particle, force, dimension, or conserved quantity is introduced; the suspected polar planet around 2M1510 AB is an observational hypothesis from Baycroft et al. (2025), not an entity invented by this paper.

free parameters (6)
  • Simulation Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity alpha_SS = 0.005
    Chosen by hand in Section 3.1 to model viscosity; differs from the analytical value alpha=1e-4 used in Figure 2, and the discrepancy is not discussed.
  • Initial disc aspect ratio (H/r)_in = 0.05
    Set at the inner disc edge in Section 3.1; one of the parameters tested in the analytical timescale study, not constrained by observation for 2M1510 AB.
  • Initial disc tilt i0 = 75 degrees
    Chosen in Section 3.1 to be above the critical tilt from Eq. (4); the simulation result depends on this favorable initial condition.
  • Disc mass fraction = 0.1% of binary mass
    Chosen in Section 3.1 so the disc does not affect the binary orbit and the disc-to-binary angular momentum ratio j0 is low.
  • Simulation outer disc radius r_out = 0.6 au, or 10 a_b
    Adopted in Section 3.1 to keep the disc narrow and rigidly precessing; a wider disc might break and invalidate the timescale formula.
  • Modified disc radius relation parameters = r0=100 au, alpha=0.5, M_break=0.1 M_sun, beta and gamma unspecified
    Eq. (9) is used in Section 4.1 to infer a 15 au dust disc and 30 au gas disc around 2M1510 AB; beta and gamma are not given numerical values, so the 30 au estimate is not fully specified.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Keplerian angular velocity and standard angular momentum integrals in Eqs. (5) and (6) define the disc-to-binary angular momentum ratio j0.
    Used in Section 2 to compute the critical tilt angle from Eq. (4) and to place 2M1510 AB in the low-j0 or high-j0 regime.
  • domain assumption Linear warp propagation theory with the bending-wave regime gives the polar alignment timescale Eq. (1) and the global precession frequency Eq. (2).
    Invoked in Section 2 before Eq. (1); requires H/r > alpha_SS and linear warp dissipation.
  • domain assumption The circumbinary disc precesses as a coherent rigid body and does not break or tear.
    The paper notes that Eq. (3) cannot be applied if the disc breaks; the SPH simulation is deliberately set up with r_out=10 a_b to avoid breakage, so applying the timescale to wider discs assumes coherence.
  • domain assumption Primordial discs around brown dwarf binaries can form with substantial misalignment relative to the binary plane.
    Used in the Introduction and Section 2 to justify considering an initially 75 degree tilted disc for 2M1510 AB.
  • ad hoc to paper The modified empirical disc radius relation Eq. (9) captures the flattening of disc size at very low stellar masses.
    Adopted in Section 4.1 to estimate a 30 au gas disc around 2M1510 AB; beta and gamma are not given, and the relation is an extrapolation from sparse brown dwarf disc observations.
  • domain assumption Protoplanetary disc lifetimes around brown dwarfs are comparable to the 1 to 10 Myr range used as the alignment deadline.
    Used in Figures 1 and 2 to decide whether the disc can reach polar alignment before dispersal; brown dwarf discs are not directly observed around binaries.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polar alignment of a circumbinary disc around a brown dwarf binary." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OILEWYEO

@misc{pith2026250622747,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polar alignment of a circumbinary disc around a brown dwarf binary},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OILEWYEO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22747}
}
abstract

Inspired by recent observations suggesting that the retrograde precession of the brown dwarf binary 2M1510 AB is consistent with induction by a polar circumbinary planet, we investigate the formation of such planets by studying the evolution of a primordial misaligned circumbinary disc around a brown dwarf binary. Analytical calculations show that a critical tilt angle of $i_{\rm crit} \gtrsim 50^\circ$ for moderately eccentric binaries is needed for polar alignment of circumbinary discs in systems with low disc-to-binary angular momentum ratios. For higher ratios, this angle converges to the Kozai-Lidov instability threshold of $\sim 39^\circ$. We identify disc parameters, such as viscosity ($\alpha = 10^{-4}$) and aspect ratio ($H/r = 0.05$), that enable polar alignment within typical disc lifetimes. Notably, a circumbinary disc around a low-mass binary, such as a brown dwarf binary, will require more time to achieve polar alignment compared to higher-mass systems. A hydrodynamical simulation confirms that an initially inclined disc around a brown dwarf evolves towards a polar state, creating favorable conditions for polar planet formation. Using these results, we finish by placing 2M1510 AB into a wider context and speculate why such a polar circumbinary configuration has not been identified before.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22747 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Polar alignment timescale (polar) from Eq. (1) as a function of binary mass () and semi-major axis (b) for binary eccentricities b = 0.36, b = 0.5, b = 0.7, and b = 0.88 (from top to bottom), for an outer disc radius out = 50b (left plot), out = 100b (middle plot), and out = 200b (right plot). Higher masses and smaller separations lead to faster alignment, with shorter timescales at higher eccentricities. We overlay… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The polar alignment timescale, polar, is shown as a function of the circumbinary disc radius, out, expressed in units of the binary semi￾major axis, b, for different values of disc viscosity (black) with disc aspect ratio / = 0.05, and different values of / (blue) with = 10−4 . The horizontal red line represents the estimated upper limit for the age of a protoplanetary disc, which ranges from 1 to 10 Myr. The horizo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The critical tilt separating coplanar versus polar alignment from Eq. (4) as a function of disc angular momentum to binary angular momentum ratio, 0. The black and blue curves represent to low 0 and high 0 approx￾imations, respectively. The red dot is the transition point between these two regimes. which is appropriate for protoplanetary discs (e.g., Hueso & Guillot 2005; Rafikov 2016; Ansdell et al. 2018). In this … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top left panel: Initial disc structure tilted by 75◦ , with the color indicating surface density—yellow corresponds to values approximately two orders of magnitude greater than blue. The brown dwarf binary components are represented by red dots, and the disc is viewed …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The -parameter from Eq. (7) is shown as a function of the binary separation, AB−C, and the outer edge of the gaseous disc, out. The dashed curve represents the points where . 1. The dotted line corresponds to the lower limit of the projected separation of 2M1510 AB, 25…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The observed outer disc edge, out, as a function of star mass of discs around brown dwarfs from Testi et al. (2016) (red), Hendler et al. (2017) (blue), and Rilinger et al. (2019) (green). The solid black curves denotes the scaling relation from Eq. 8 and the dashed bl…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Stability of circumbinary particle orbits around 2M1510 AB under the influence of the tertiary component 2M1510 C. Top panel: The von Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov (vZKL) timescale, vZKL (in years), as a function of the particle’s semi-major axis, (in au), from the central binary…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aly H., Dehnen W., Nixon C., King A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv128 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449...65A 449, 65

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv128 2015

  2. [2]

    M., Rosenfeld K

    Andrews S. M., Rosenfeld K. A., Kraus A. L., Wilner D. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/129 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...771..129A 771, 129

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/2/129 2013

  3. [3]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..41A 869, L41

    Andrews S. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..41A 869, L41

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  4. [4]

    Ansdell M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab890 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...21A 859, 21

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab890 2018

  5. [5]

    P., 2005, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1118042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Sci...310..834A 310, 834

    Apai D., Pascucci I., Bouwman J., Natta A., Henning T., Dullemond C. P., 2005, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1118042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Sci...310..834A 310, 834

    doi:10.1126/science.1118042 2005

  6. [6]

    H., 1994, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/173679 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...421..651A 421, 651

    Artymowicz P., Lubow S. H., 1994, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/173679 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...421..651A 421, 651

    doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  7. [7]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Rybizki J., Fouesneau M., Mantelet G., Andrae R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156...58B 156, 58

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 2018

  8. [8]

    R., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19955.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419.3115B 419, 3115

    Bate M. R., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19955.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419.3115B 419, 3115

    arXiv 2012

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty169 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.5618B 475, 5618

    Bate M. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty169 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.5618B 475, 5618

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/285.1.33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.285...33B 285, 33

    1997 doi

  3. [11]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Price N. M., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/277.2.362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.277..362B 277, 362

    1995 doi

  4. [12]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Bromm V., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06210.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.339..577B 339, 577

    2003

  5. [13]

    R., Lodato G., Pringle J

    Bate M. R., Lodato G., Pringle J. E., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15773.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401.1505B 401, 1505

    2010

  6. [14]

    A., Triaud A

    Baycroft T. A., Triaud A. H. M. J., Lai D., 2024, in Lemaitre A., Libert A.-S., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 382, Complex Planetary Systems II: Latest Methods for an Interdisciplinary Approach. pp 51--58 ( @eprint arXiv 2409.04191 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921323004180

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    A., Sairam L., Triaud A

    Baycroft T. A., Sairam L., Triaud A. H. M. J., Correia A. C. M., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250412209B p. arXiv:2504.12209

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    H., Charbonneau D., White R

    Blake C. H., Charbonneau D., White R. J., 2010, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/684 , 723, 684

    2010 doi

  9. [17]

    Bonnell I., Bastien P., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172093 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...401..654B 401, 654

    1992 doi

  10. [18]

    P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acbd34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165..164B 165, 164

    Bowler B. P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acbd34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165..164B 165, 164

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Kirkpatrick J

    Burgasser A. J., Kirkpatrick J. D., Reid I. N., Brown M. E., Miskey C. L., Gizis J. E., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...586..512B 586, 512

    2003 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Kirkpatrick J

    Burgasser A. J., Kirkpatrick J. D., Cruz K. L., Reid I. N., Leggett S. K., Liebert J., Burrows A., Brown M. E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506327 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..585B 166, 585

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    B., Lunine J

    Burrows A., Hubbard W. B., Lunine J. I., Liebert J., 2001, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.719 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001RvMP...73..719B 73, 719

    2001 doi

  14. [22]

    Calissendorff P., Janson M., Asensio-Torres R., K \"o hler R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935319 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...627A.167C 627, A167

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Allard F., Hauschildt P., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..464C 542, 464

    2000 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Dumas C., Zuckerman B., Mouillet D., Song I., Beuzit J

    Chauvin G., Lagrange A. M., Dumas C., Zuckerman B., Mouillet D., Song I., Beuzit J. L., Lowrance P., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200500116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...438L..25C 438, L25

    2005 doi

  17. [25]

    Chen Z., Kipping D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.5162C 513, 5162

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    H., Martin R

    Chen C., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.4645C 494, 4645

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    I., Goldreich P., 1997, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/304869 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..368C 490, 368

    Chiang E. I., Goldreich P., 1997, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/304869 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..368C 490, 368

    1997 doi

  20. [28]

    C., Martin R

    Childs A. C., Martin R. G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920L...8C 920, L8

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    H., Claes P., Torra J., Laureijs R

    Comeron F., Rieke G. H., Claes P., Torra J., Laureijs R. J., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...335..522C 335, 522

    1998

  22. [30]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.119C 628, A119

    Cuello N., Giuppone C. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.119C 628, A119

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (IPAC/California Institute of Te...

    2003

  24. [32]

    M., Jensen E

    Czekala I., Andrews S. M., Jensen E. L. N., Stassun K. G., Torres G., Wilner D. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..154C 806, 154

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    M., Jensen E

    Czekala I., Chiang E., Andrews S. M., Jensen E. L. N., Torres G., Wilner D. J., Stassun K. G., Macintosh B., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab287b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...22C 883, 22

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Daemgen S., Natta A., Scholz A., Testi L., Jayawardhana R., Greaves J., Eastwood D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628431 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..83D 594, A83

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.1216D 437, 1216

    De Rosa R. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.1216D 437, 1216

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Delorme P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...553L...5D 553, L5

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.6078D 512, 6078

    Deng H., Ogilvie G. I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.6078D 512, 6078

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Ryan G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f1e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...967...12D 967, 12

    Dittmann A. J., Ryan G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f1e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...967...12D 967, 12

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Duch \^e ne G., Kraus A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Liu M

    Dupuy T. J., Liu M. C., Evans E. L., Best W. M. J., Pearce L. A., Sanghi A., Phillips M. W., Bardalez Gagliuffi D. C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1688D 519, 1688

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2142F 433, 2142

    Facchini S., Lodato G., Price D. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2142F 433, 2142

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    W., Ogilvie G

    Fairbairn C. W., Ogilvie G. I., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.2426F 508, 2426

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Fontanive C., Biller B., Bonavita M., Allers K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2702F 479, 2702

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    B., Kozinsky B., Rasio F

    Ford E. B., Kozinsky B., Rasio F. A., 2000, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/308815 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...535..385F 535, 385

    2000 doi

  37. [45]

    Gagn \'e J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219...33G 219, 33

    2015 doi

  38. [46]

    Gauza B., B \'e jar V. J. S., P \'e rez-Garrido A., Zapatero Osorio M. R., Lodieu N., Rebolo R., Pall \'e E., Nowak G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/96 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804...96G 804, 96

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Gillon M., Triaud A. H. M. J., Jehin E., Delrez L., Opitom C., Magain P., Lendl M., Queloz D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555L...5G 555, L5

    2013 doi

  40. [48]

    P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa71b8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841..116H 841, 116

    Hendler N. P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa71b8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841..116H 841, 116

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    Hueso R., Guillot T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...442..703H 442, 703

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    Ida S., Lin D. N. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...604..388I 604, 388

    2004 doi

  43. [51]

    Ida S., Lin D. N. C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429953 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626.1045I 626, 1045

    2005 doi

  44. [52]

    R., Stelzer B., Haisch Jr

    Jayawardhana R., Ardila D. R., Stelzer B., Haisch Jr. K. E., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1515J 126, 1515

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3..230K 3, 230

    Kennedy G. M., et al., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3..230K 3, 230

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    G., Eggleton P

    Kiseleva L. G., Eggleton P. P., Mikkola S., 1998, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01903.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.300..292K 300, 292

    1998

  47. [55]

    Klein R., Apai D., Pascucci I., Henning T., Waters L. B. F. M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...593L..57K 593, L57

    2003 doi

  48. [56]

    W., Kulkarni S

    Konacki M., Muterspaugh M. W., Kulkarni S. R., He miniak K. G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...704..513K 704, 513

    2009 doi

  49. [57]

    Kozai Y., 1962, @doi [AJ] 10.1086/108790 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962AJ.....67..591K 67, 591

    1962 doi

  50. [58]

    S., 1963, @doi [ ] 10.1086/147589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963ApJ...137.1121K 137, 1121

    Kumar S. S., 1963, @doi [ ] 10.1086/147589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963ApJ...137.1121K 137, 1121

    1963 doi

  51. [59]

    L., 1962, @doi [Planet

    Lidov M. L., 1962, @doi [Planet. Space Sci.] 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962P

    1962 doi

  52. [60]

    Liu B., Lambrechts M., Johansen A., Pascucci I., Henning T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..88L 638, A88

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    J., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16526.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.1212L 405, 1212

    Lodato G., Price D. J., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16526.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.1212L 405, 1212

    2010

  54. [63]

    Lodato G., Rice W. K. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07811.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.351..630L 351, 630

    2004

  55. [64]

    J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00112.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.364L..91L 364, L91

    Lodato G., Delgado-Donate E., Clarke C. J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00112.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.364L..91L 364, L91

    2005

  56. [65]

    H., Martin R

    Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2643 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3733L 473, 3733

    2018 doi

  57. [66]

    H., Ogilvie G

    Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309101 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...538..326L 538, 326

    2000 doi

  58. [67]

    E., Bell C

    Mamajek E. E., Bell C. P. M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1894 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.2169M 445, 2169

    2014 doi

  59. [68]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/L28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835L..28M 835, L28

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.1332M 490, 1332

    2019 doi

  61. [70]

    V., Triaud A

    Martin D. V., Triaud A. H. M. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...570A..91M 570, A91

    2014 doi

  62. [71]

    V., Triaud A

    Martin D. V., Triaud A. H. M. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449..781M 449, 781

    2015 doi

  63. [72]

    V., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833669 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..68M 624, A68

    Martin D. V., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833669 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..68M 624, A68

    2019 doi

  64. [73]

    G., Lepp S., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lepp S., Lubow S. H., Kenworthy M. A., Kennedy G. M., Vallet D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac54b4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927L..26M 927, L26

    2022 doi

  65. [74]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., Vallet D., Anugu N., Gies D. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...957L..28M 957, L28

    2023 doi

  66. [75]

    E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb04a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L...6M 946, L6

    Miles B. E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb04a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L...6M 946, L6

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    Mohanty S., Jayawardhana R., Natta A., Fujiyoshi T., Tamura M., Barrado y Navascu \'e s D., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422555 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...609L..33M 609, L33

    2004 doi

  68. [77]

    Mohanty S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773..168M 773, 168

    2013 doi

  69. [78]

    A., Alves J., Lada C

    Muench A. A., Alves J., Lada C. J., Lada E. A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323420 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...558L..51M 558, L51

    2001 doi

  70. [79]

    Natta A., Testi L., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011055 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...376L..22N 376, L22

    2001 doi

  71. [80]

    Natta A., Testi L., Comer \'o n F., Oliva E., D'Antona F., Baffa C., Comoretto G., Gennari S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021065 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...393..597N 393, 597

    2002 doi

  72. [81]

    L., Aly H., Winter A

    Nealon R., Smallwood J. L., Aly H., Winter A. J., Longarini C., Cuello N., Veras D., Alexander R., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540L..84N 540, L84

    2025 doi

  73. [82]

    J., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21072.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.2597N 423, 2597

    Nixon C. J., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21072.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.2597N 423, 2597

    2012

  74. [83]

    Offner S. S. R., Kratter K. M., Matzner C. D., Krumholz M. R., Klein R. I., 2010, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1485 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725.1485O 725, 1485

    2010 doi

  75. [84]

    S., Moe M., Kratter K

    Offner S. S., Moe M., Kratter K. M., Sadavoy S. I., Jensen E. L., Tobin J. J., 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10066

    2022 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Papaloizou J. C. B., Lin D. N. C., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175127 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...438..841P 438, 841

    1995 doi

  77. [86]

    J., Lodato G., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12362.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1597P 381, 1597

    Payne M. J., Lodato G., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12362.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1597P 381, 1597

    2007

  78. [87]

    W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..38P 637, A38

    Phillips M. W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..38P 637, A38

    2020 doi

  79. [88]

    L., Rein H., Morley C

    Poon M., Bryan M. L., Rein H., Morley C. V., Mace G., Zhou Y., Bowler B. P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad84e5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..270P 168, 270

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031

    Price D. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031

    2018 doi

  81. [90]

    R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830....7R 830, 7

    Rafikov R. R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830....7R 830, 7

    2016 doi

  82. [91]

    Raghavan D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..190....1R 190, 1

    2010 doi

  83. [92]

    Ricci L., Testi L., Natta A., Scholz A., de Gregorio-Monsalvo I., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/761/2/L20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761L..20R 761, L20

    2012 doi

  84. [93]

    Ricci L., Testi L., Natta A., Scholz A., de Gregorio-Monsalvo I., Isella A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791...20R 791, 20

    2014 doi

  85. [94]

    A., Currie T., Wisniewski J

    Rich E. A., Currie T., Wisniewski J. P., Hashimoto J., Brandt T. D., Carson J. C., Kuzuhara M., Uyama T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830..114R 830, 114

    2016 doi

  86. [95]

    M., Espaillat C

    Rilinger A. M., Espaillat C. C., Mac \' as E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab211d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878..103R 878, 103

    2019 doi

  87. [96]

    F., S \'e gransan D., Mart \' n E

    Sahlmann J., Lazorenko P. F., S \'e gransan D., Mart \' n E. L., Mayor M., Queloz D., Udry S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...565A..20S 565, A20

    2014 doi

  88. [97]

    Sanchis E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039733 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..19S 649, A19

    2021 doi

  89. [98]

    Schneider J., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0032-0633(94)90075-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994P&SS...42..539S 42, 539

    1994 doi

  90. [99]

    Scholz A., Jayawardhana R., Wood K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504464 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...645.1498S 645, 1498

    2006 doi

  91. [100]

    Scholz A., Jayawardhana R., Wood K., Meeus G., Stelzer B., Walker C., O'Sullivan M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660.1517S 660, 1517

    2007 doi

  92. [101]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A

    1973

  93. [102]

    L., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Lubow S. H., Franchini A., Martin R. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz994 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.2919S 486, 2919

    2019 doi

  94. [103]

    L., Franchini A., Chen C., Becerril E., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Franchini A., Chen C., Becerril E., Lubow S. H., Yang C.-C., Martin R. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..487S 494, 487

    2020 doi

  95. [104]

    L., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.1249S 514, 1249

    2022 doi

  96. [105]

    L., Lin M.-K., Aly H., Nealon R., Longarini C., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.1068S 532, 1068

    Smallwood J. L., Lin M.-K., Aly H., Nealon R., Longarini C., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.1068S 532, 1068

    doi

  97. [106]

    L., Lin M.-K., Nealon R., Aly H., Longarini C., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.4018S 534, 4018

    Smallwood J. L., Lin M.-K., Nealon R., Aly H., Longarini C., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.4018S 534, 4018

    doi

  98. [107]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01948-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..702S 7, 702

    Standing M. R., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01948-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..702S 7, 702

    2023 doi

  99. [108]

    G., Mathieu R

    Stassun K. G., Mathieu R. D., Valenti J. A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature04570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.440..311S 440, 311

    2006 doi

  100. [109]

    M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L..12S 818, L12

    Stone J. M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L..12S 818, L12

    2016 doi

  101. [110]

    Testi L., Natta A., Scholz A., Tazzari M., Ricci L., de Gregorio Monsalvo I., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...593A.111T 593, A111

    2016 doi

  102. [111]

    Tokuda K., et al., 2014, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789L...4T 789, L4

    2014 doi

  103. [112]

    Triaud A. H. M. J., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1018-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4..650T 4, 650

    2020 doi

  104. [113]

    G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab05dc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..216W 157, 216

    Winters J. G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab05dc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..216W 157, 216

    2019 doi

  105. [114]

    J., Lai D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1957Z 467, 1957

    Zanazzi J. J., Lai D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1957Z 467, 1957

    2017 doi

  106. [115]

    J., Lai D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2375 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..603Z 473, 603

    Zanazzi J. J., Lai D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2375 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..603Z 473, 603

    2018 doi

  107. [116]

    Zuckerman B., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870...27Z 870, 27

    2019 doi

  108. [117]

    von Zeipel H., 1910, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.19091832202 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1910AN....183..345V 183, 345

    1910 doi

  109. [118]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.