Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Size-Dependent Tensile Behavior of Nanocrystalline HfNbTaTiZr High-Entropy Alloy: Roles of Solid-Solution and Short-Range Order

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read In nanocrystalline HfNbTaTiZr, random atomic mixing raises strength while chemical short-range order lowers stress but delays failure, and the two change the grain size at which smaller grains stop being stronger.

desk verdict A clean MA/RSS/MC decomposition of a BCC RHEA, but all mechanism claims ride on one in-house EAM potential whose defect energetics are unchecked; send to peer review with a request for DFT-level validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22822 v1 pith:2RG5EN2R submitted 2025-06-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Refractoryhigh-entropyalloysChemicalshort-rangeorderRandomsolid-solutionstrengtheningGrainsizeeffectHall-PetchInverseMoleculardynamicsMachinelearningforcefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how grain size and atomic-scale chemical arrangement jointly set the tensile behavior of the refractory high-entropy alloy HfNbTaTiZr. By building three molecular-dynamics models—a hypothetical average 'meta-atom' crystal, a random five-element solid solution, and a Monte-Carlo relaxed solid with short-range order—it isolates two effects that are usually tangled in simulations. It finds that random solid-solution mixing raises elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength, and flow stress, while chemical short-range order lowers those quantities but improves strain hardening and failure resistance. It also finds a Hall-Petch to inverse Hall-Petch crossover in strength and claims short-range order suppresses this transition by reducing the critical grain size from about 13 nm to about 10 nm. If these trends hold in real samples, they suggest processing that tunes chemical ordering can trade strength for ductility within a narrow grain-size window.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a three-way model decomposition built on a machine-learning-accelerated embedded-atom-method (EAM) force field. The meta-atom (MA) model treats HfNbTaTiZr as one hypothetical element with averaged properties, the random solid-solution (RSS) model distributes the five elements randomly, and the Monte Carlo (MC) model uses atomic swaps to create chemical short-range order, quantified by Warren-Cowley parameters. Comparing these three models isolates the RSS and CSRO effects that are normally entangled in multi-element simulations. A second load-bearing piece is the theoretical yield-strength model: hardening from dense grain-boundary dislocation networks, expressed through Taylor-type hardening with the ideal shear strength taken from generalized stacking fault energy curves, competes with softening from liquid-like viscous flow of amorphous grain boundaries, and the crossover grain size emerges where those two contributions balance.

What would settle it

Tensile-test nanocrystalline HfNbTaTiZr with grain sizes between 4 and 25 nm and independently characterized chemical short-range order: the claim predicts a strength peak near 10 to 13 nm, higher flow stress for random solid solution than for ordered samples, and improved failure resistance with ordering. Observing monotonic softening across the whole range or the opposite ordering trend would falsify the central claim, as would a recomputation of the ideal shear strengths and transformation barriers with a different high-quality potential or direct density-functional-theory calculations that removes the predicted crossover.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a mechanistic decomposition of size-dependent tensile behavior in nanocrystalline HfNbTaTiZr. In atomistic simulations, random solid-solution mixing increases the elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength, and average flow stress relative to a hypothetical single-element alloy with averaged properties, while chemical short-range order reduces those stress levels but increases strain hardening and failure resistance. The paper shows a Hall-Petch strengthening regime giving way to inverse Hall-Petch softening below a critical grain size, and claims that chemical short-range order suppresses this transition, moving the critical grain size from about 13 nm to about 10 nm. Nanostructural analysis attributes the strengthening to denser dislocation networks, deformation twinning, and reversible BCC-to-FCC transformation, and the softening to grain-boundary migration or sliding, with the dominant mechanism shifting with both grain size and chemical order. A parameter-free theoretical model, built on competition between grain-boundary dislocation hardening and viscous flow of amorphous grain boundaries, reproduces the simulated yield strengths and predicts the critical grain sizes.

Load-bearing premise

Every finding rests on the atomic-force model being accurate under severe deformation, yet the model was validated only on equilibrium crystal properties and uses an empirical averaging rule for interactions between unlike atoms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Random chemical mixing is predicted to act as a strengthening agent in this alloy, raising modulus and all measured strengths across the tested 4 to 25 nm grain-size range.
  • Introducing chemical short-range order lowers strength but keeps stress at a higher level after peak load, so ordering could be used as a lever for ductility and failure resistance.
  • Grain sizes below about 10 to 13 nm reverse the strength trend, meaning nanograin engineering has an optimal size, and chemical short-range order shifts that optimum downward.
  • The parameter-free yield-strength model connects the critical grain size to stacking-fault energetics, making it transferable to other refractory high-entropy alloys and potentially to experimental grain-size design.
  • The additive decomposition of stress into grain-boundary, intragrain dislocation, twin, and transformed-phase contributions gives a quantitative way to identify which deformation mechanism carries the load in a given nanostructure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's scope: if the force-field trends survive experimental checks, annealing treatments that enhance chemical short-range order could become a processing knob to suppress inverse Hall-Petch weakening at very small grain sizes while deliberately accepting a lower yield strength.
  • Beyond the paper's scope: the same three-model decomposition could be applied to other refractory high-entropy alloys, where the relative phase stability of the constituent elements is likely to determine whether short-range order helps or hurts overall performance.
  • Beyond the paper's scope: the predicted critical grain sizes of about 13 nm (random solid solution) and about 10 nm (with short-range order) are specific to the developed potential; experimental tension tests on nanocrystalline samples with characterized ordering would be the natural test, though grain-boundary chemistry changes with ordering may complicate direct comparison.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a machine-learning-accelerated framework to parameterize EAM interatomic force fields for the HfNbTaTiZr refractory high-entropy alloy, then uses molecular dynamics to compare three nanocrystalline models: a meta-atom surrogate (MA), a quinary random solid-solution model (RSS), and a Monte Carlo model with chemical short-range order (CSRO). Across grain sizes from 4 to 25 nm, the paper reports that RSS increases elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength, and flow stress, while CSRO reduces these stress levels but enhances strain hardening and failure resistance. A Hall-Petch to inverse Hall-Petch transition is observed, with CSRO shifting the critical grain size from about 13 nm to about 10 nm. The authors attribute these differences to changes in plastic mechanisms (dislocation slip, twinning, phase transformation, grain-boundary motion) and propose theoretical models for the critical grain size and for separating the stress contributions of different deformation mechanisms.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful methodological template: the meta-atom approach offers a way to decouple random solid-solution and short-range-order effects in atomistic simulations, and the ML-accelerated FF parameterization could speed up future alloy modeling. The large-scale MD data, the internal consistency of the RSS/CSRO trends, and the attempt to build a physically motivated critical-grain-size model are genuine contributions. However, the lack of defect-level validation against DFT or experiment and the absence of statistical uncertainty for the key comparative claims currently limit the strength of the conclusions. The work is significant for computational materials science of RHEAs, but the evidence base is not yet sufficient for the quantitative predictions to be taken as established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1 and Sections 3.2/4.2] The alloy and MA force fields are validated only against equilibrium DFT properties (cohesive energies, lattice constants, elastic constants, phase energy differences in Figs. 3 and 4). However, the central mechanistic claims rest on defect-level energetics computed with the same potential: the GSFE curves in Fig. 12b, the Bain/Burgers transformation barriers in Fig. 12e, the Sigma5(210) GB sliding barriers in Fig. 13b, and the ideal shear strength tau_max used in the Dc model of Section 4.2. Because the cross-species interactions are obtained from the empirical mixing law (Eq. 1), errors in fault and transformation energetics would propagate directly into the predicted RSS/CSRO trends and the Dc shift. I recommend adding DFT calculations of at least the planar fault energies and transformation barriers for representative Hf-Zr-Ti-rich and Nb-Ta-rich local environments, or a direct comparison with experimental fault-energy or twinning data, before the mechanistic conclusions are accepted.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eqs. 4-7] The claim that the theoretical model 'requires no fitting parameters' is not fully supported. The model relies on the grain-boundary thickness delta = 0.8 nm, which is 'estimated GB thickness in MD results,' and on the ledge density m in rho_GB = 8m/(pi D); neither is derived from first principles. The ideal shear strength tau_max is read from the FF-computed GSFE curves, so the Dc prediction is internal to the same potential used to generate the MD yield-strength data. The authors should either identify independent sources for delta and m, or report a sensitivity analysis showing that the predicted Dc values (14.89, 13.54, 10.99 nm) are robust to reasonable variations in these quantities.
  3. [Fig. 5 and Table 4] No error bars or standard deviations are reported for any of the mechanical properties, and for the smallest grain sizes (D = 4, 6, 8 nm) only a single configuration was simulated. Since the reported differences between MA, RSS, and MC models are modest for some quantities (for example, modulus differences of a few GPa), the statistical significance of the RSS/CSRO trends and of the Dc shift from ~13 nm to ~10 nm is not established. I request multiple independent grain-orientation samples for all grain sizes, and error bars in Fig. 5, so that the comparative claims can be evaluated quantitatively.
  4. [Section 4.3, Eq. 11] The stress-decomposition model introduces two adjustable parameters A and n for the twinning contribution, and the model is acknowledged to become inaccurate at later flow stages because the individual stress contributions are constrained to be non-negative. As presented, this limits the claim of 'quantitatively separating' mechanism contributions to the elastic and early-plastic regime. Please report the fitted values of A and n, their sensitivity, and a quantitative measure of agreement (e.g., R^2 or mean absolute error) between the model and MD stress-strain curves over the full strain range.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] Equation (1), the empirical mixing law for alloy interactions, is referenced but the formula itself is missing from the displayed text; please include the explicit expression.
  2. [Introduction] The phrase 'Groups VI ~ VI of the periodic table' should presumably read 'Groups IV-VI' for refractory elements; please correct.
  3. [Table 3] The definition of modulus contains a typo: 'Slop of the stress-strain curve' should be 'Slope of the stress-strain curve.'
  4. [Section 3.1] The phrase 'in well consistence with reference values' should be 'in good consistency with reference values' or similar.
  5. [General] The supplementary material is referenced throughout but its availability is not specified; please confirm it is included with the submission and mention any repository links for the developed force fields and simulation scripts.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Secondary stress-decomposition 'prediction' is a post-hoc reconstruction from MD data; central RSS/CSRO and Dc conclusions remain direct simulation results and are not circularly derived.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3, Eqs. 8-12 and Fig. 15]
    "Substituting Eqs. 9~12 into Eq. 8, the stress-strain response of nanocrystalline RHEAs can be predicted. In this derived model, all the nanostructural variables (e.g., dislocation density ρ, shear strain at TBs γTB, volume fraction of phases f, etc.) can be obtained from MD data."

    The 'prediction' in Fig. 15 is assembled from the same MD trajectories whose stress-strain response it claims to predict: the dislocation density, twin-boundary shear strain, and transformed-phase fractions all come from those simulations, and the yielding input to σGB comes from Eq. 4, which itself uses the same force field's GSFE. With A and n in Eq. 11 treated as adjustable material parameters, agreement with the MD stress-strain curves is an accounting reconstruction rather than an independent test. The central RSS/CSRO comparisons remain direct simulation outputs, but the model's status as a 'prediction' is overstated.

full rationale

The central claims about RSS, CSRO, and the HP-IHP transition are obtained by direct MD simulation using force fields parameterized in the paper and checked against DFT for equilibrium properties; they are not derived from the fitted HP-IHP law or from the later theoretical models. The Dc model in Section 4.2 is parameter-free in the sense that it does not fit the yield-strength data, although it does use τmax from GSFE curves computed with the same FF as the MD data; that makes it an internal-consistency check rather than an independent validation, but it is not a logical reduction of the prediction to its inputs. The genuine circularity is narrower: Section 4.3's 'prediction' of the stress-strain response uses MD-derived structural variables and adjustable parameters to reconstruct the very curves it is compared against, so the agreement in Fig. 15 is partly by construction. The lack of experimental or DFT validation of defect-level energetics (stacking-fault, transformation, and GB-sliding barriers) is a correctness risk, not a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on four pillars: (1) the in-house EAM force field, whose alloy cross-terms come from an empirical mixing law (Eq. 1) and which is validated against DFT only for equilibrium properties; (2) the meta-atom equivalence assumption that lets the authors attribute MA-versus-RSS differences to chemical effects; (3) the MC-generated CSRO state as representative of real short-range order; and (4) literature constitutive laws (Taylor hardening, viscous GB flow, power-law twinning) used in the analytical models. The free parameters (delta, m, A, n) are respectively an MD estimate, a literature input, and fitted values, so the analytical models are not parameter-free in the strict sense claimed in Section 4.2. No new physical entities are introduced; the meta-atom is a surrogate borrowed from prior literature.

free parameters (4)
  • Grain boundary thickness delta = 0.8 nm
    Estimated from MD results in the paper and used in fg = [(D - delta)/D]^3 (Eq. 7) for the softening stress; directly influences the predicted critical grain size.
  • Ledge density m = not stated in main text
    Enters the GB dislocation density scaling rho_GB = 8m/(pi*D) (Eq. 5, from ref 69); the value is not given in the main text and presumably sits in the missing Table S4.
  • Twin stress amplitude A = not stated in main text
    Adjustable parameter in the twinning power law (Eq. 11); fitted so the decomposition model matches the MD flow stress.
  • Twin stress exponent n = not stated in main text
    Adjustable parameter in Eq. 11 along with A; fitted to the MD stress-strain curves.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Alloys with identical bulk material constants exhibit identical mechanical responses, so a meta-atom single-element model can represent the average alloy
    The premise that makes the MA model a legitimate surrogate for isolating RSS and CSRO effects; the paper itself notes it contradicts observed 'cocktail' effects (Section 3.1) and attributes the discrepancy to RSS/CSRO.
  • domain assumption The Zhou-form EAM with the concentration-weighted mixing law (Eq. 1) accurately captures Hf-Nb-Ta-Ti-Zr interactions
    All simulations use this FF; it is validated only against DFT equilibrium properties (Figs. 3 and 4), not against mechanical measurements (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo atom swaps produce a representative room-temperature chemical short-range order state
    The MC models ground all CSRO conclusions; clustering of Hf-Zr-Ti and Nb-Ta is compared with experiments (refs 42, 43), but the sampling schedule and its representativeness are not detailed (Section 2.2).
  • domain assumption The nanocrystal is a two-phase composite of an amorphous GB phase and crystalline interior, with rho_GB = 8m/(pi*D) and viscous-flow GB behavior
    Imported from refs 50, 67, 69, 73, 74; this composite picture is the foundation of the yield-strength model and Dc prediction in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption Standard constitutive forms: Taylor equation for dislocations, power law for twinning, elastic response for transformed phases
    The mechanism decomposition (Eqs. 10-12) relies on these forms; the twin law has adjustable parameters and the elastic assumption for FCC/HCP phases is stated in Section 4.3.
invented entities (1)
  • Meta-atom (MA) hypothetical single element representing HfNbTaTiZr
    purpose: Provides a chemically homogeneous baseline with alloy-averaged properties so that RSS and CSRO effects can be isolated by comparison with the full-element models.
    A computational surrogate, not a physical entity, introduced in prior literature (refs 18, 32, 33). It makes a falsifiable prediction (the alloy should behave like its average) that the paper shows fails, which exposes the RSS/CSRO effect, but there is no external handle validating the surrogate itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Size-Dependent Tensile Behavior of Nanocrystalline HfNbTaTiZr High-Entropy Alloy: Roles of Solid-Solution and Short-Range Order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RG5EN2R

@misc{pith2026250622822,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Size-Dependent Tensile Behavior of Nanocrystalline HfNbTaTiZr High-Entropy Alloy: Roles of Solid-Solution and Short-Range Order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RG5EN2R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22822}
}
read the original abstract

This study investigates the size-dependent mechanical behavior of the HfNbTaTiZr refractory high-entropy alloy (RHEA) under uniaxial tension, with a focus on the effects of random solid-solution (RSS) and chemical short-range order (CSRO). A machine learning framework is developed to accelerate the parameterization of interatomic force fields (FFs), enabling molecular dynamics simulations of three nanocrystalline models: (i) a meta-atom (MA) mode representing the RHEA as a hypothetical sing-element system with averaged properties, (ii) a quinary RSS model with randomly distributed constituent atoms, and (iii) a Monte Carlo (MC) model with internal CSRO. The results reveal that RSS enhances strength, while CSRO reduces flow stress level but improves strain hardening and failure resistance. A transition from Hall-Petch (HP) strengthening to inverse Hall-Petch (IHP) softening is observed, with CSRO suppressing this transition. The underlying plastic mechanisms (i.e., dislocation slip, deformation twinning, phase transformation and grain boundary movements) are analyzed from both nanostructural and energetic perspectives. Theoretical models are established to describe the size-dependent yield strength and predict the critical grain size. Additionally, the contributions of different plastic mechanisms to the overall stress response are separately quantified. These findings provide new insights into the design and performance optimization of RHEAs through nanostructural engineering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    -P., Development and exploration of refractory high entropy alloys—A review

    Senkov O.N., Miracle D.B., Chaput K.J., Couzinie J. -P., Development and exploration of refractory high entropy alloys—A review. Journal of Materials Research, 2018. 33(19): p. 3092-3128

  2. [2]

    , Refractory high -entropy alloys

    Senkov O.N., Wilks G.B., Miracle D.B., Chuang C.P., Liaw P.K. , Refractory high -entropy alloys. Intermetallics, 2010. 18(9): p. 1758-1765

  3. [3]

    , More than entropy in high -entropy alloys: Forming solid solutions or amorphous phase

    Guo S., Hu Q., Ng C., Liu C.T. , More than entropy in high -entropy alloys: Forming solid solutions or amorphous phase. Intermetallics, 2013. 41: p. 96-103

  4. [4]

    , Structural anomaly in the high -entropy alloy ZrNbTiTaHf

    Heidelmann M., Feuerbacher M., Ma D., Grabowski B. , Structural anomaly in the high -entropy alloy ZrNbTiTaHf. Intermetallics, 2016. 68: p. 11-15

  5. [5]

    International Journal of Plasticity, 2025

    Xiao C., Yu L., Xiao X., Tensorial interaction model for the effect of short-range order on single crystalline medium entropy alloys. International Journal of Plasticity, 2025. 184: p. 104200

  6. [6]

    , Persson C., Veselý J., Zý ka J., Klement U., Guo S., Alloy design for intrinsically ductile refractory high -entropy alloys

    Sheikh S., Shafeie S., Hu Q., Ahlströ m J. , Persson C., Veselý J., Zý ka J., Klement U., Guo S., Alloy design for intrinsically ductile refractory high -entropy alloys. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016. 120(16): p. 164902

  7. [7]

    International Journal of Plasticity, 2025

    Zhang Y., Wang H., Yang J., Zhu Y., Li J., Li Z., Su B., Liu B., Shen C., Enhancing the strain-hardening rate and uniform tensile ductility of lightweight refractory high -entropy alloys by tailoring multi -scale heterostructure strategy. International Journal of Plasticity, 2025. 185: p. 104237

  8. [8]

    Journal of Materials Science, 2012

    Senkov O.N., Scott J.M., Senkova S.V ., Meisenkothen F., Miracle D.B., Woodward C.F., Microstructure 32 and elevated temperature properties of a refractory TaNbHfZrTi alloy. Journal of Materials Science, 2012. 47(9): p. 4062-4074

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    , Microstructure and room temperature properties of a high -entropy TaNbHfZrTi alloy

    Senkov O.N., Scott J.M., Senkova S.V ., Miracle D.B ., Woodward C.F. , Microstructure and room temperature properties of a high -entropy TaNbHfZrTi alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2011. 509(20): p. 6043-6048

  2. [10]

    , Developing a variable charge potential for Hf/Nb/Ta/Ti/Zr/O syste m via machine learning global optimization

    Wu Y., Yu W., Shen S. , Developing a variable charge potential for Hf/Nb/Ta/Ti/Zr/O syste m via machine learning global optimization. Materials & Design, 2023. 230: p. 111999

  3. [11]

    , Size-dependent mechanical responses of twinned Nanocrystalline HfNbZrTi refractory high -entropy alloy

    Wu Y., Bai Z., Yan G., Yu W., Shen S. , Size-dependent mechanical responses of twinned Nanocrystalline HfNbZrTi refractory high -entropy alloy. International Journal o f Refractory Metals and Hard Materials,

  4. [12]

    , Effect of aluminum on the microstructure and properties of two refractory high-entropy alloys

    Senkov O.N., Senkova S.V ., Woodward C. , Effect of aluminum on the microstructure and properties of two refractory high-entropy alloys. Acta Materialia, 2014. 68: p. 214-228

  5. [13]

    E., Ferreira P.J

    Carlton C. E., Ferreira P.J. , What is behind the inverse Hall –Petch effect in nanocrystalline materials? Acta Materialia, 2007. 55(11): p. 3749-3756

  6. [14]

    , The Hall –Petch and inverse Hall –Petch relations and the hardness of nanocrystalline metals

    Naik S.N., Walley S.M. , The Hall –Petch and inverse Hall –Petch relations and the hardness of nanocrystalline metals. Journal of Materials Science, 2020. 55(7): p. 2661-2681

  7. [15]

    , A unified mechanistic model for Hall –Petch and inverse Hall –Petch relations of nanocrystalline metals based on intragranular dislocation storage

    Han Q., Yi X. , A unified mechanistic model for Hall –Petch and inverse Hall –Petch relations of nanocrystalline metals based on intragranular dislocation storage. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2021. 154: p. 104530

  8. [16]

    Yamakov V ., D. W., R. P.S., K. M.A., and Gleiter H., Deformation mechanism crossover and mechanical behaviour in nanocrystalline materials. Philosophical Magazine Letters, 2003. 83(6): p. 385-393

  9. [17]

    , Study of the plastic deformation mechanism of TRIP – TWIP high entropy alloys at the atomic level

    Bahramyan M., Mousavian R.T., Brabazon D. , Study of the plastic deformation mechanism of TRIP – TWIP high entropy alloys at the atomic level. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020. 127: p. 102649

  10. [18]

    , Atomic deformation mechanism and interface toughening in metastable high entropy alloy

    Wang P., Bu Y., Liu J., Li Q., Wang H., Y ang W. , Atomic deformation mechanism and interface toughening in metastable high entropy alloy. Materials Today, 2020. 37: p. 64-73

  11. [19]

    International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020

    He X., Liu L., Zeng T., Yao Y., Micromechanical modeling of work hardening for coupling microstructure evolution, dynamic recovery and recrystallization: Application to high entropy alloys. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020. 177: p. 105567

  12. [20]

    International Journal of Plasticity, 2025

    An W., Yang J.-P., Liu C.-Z., Xiong Q.-L., Effect of twinning on shear localization of Al0.1CoCrFeNi high entropy alloy at high strain rates: Experiment and crystal plasticity modeling. International Journal of Plasticity, 2025. 189: p. 104339

  13. [21]

    Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2025

    Zhang Z., Tang Y., Zhao Q., Huang Q., Zhou H., Theoretical modeling of phase boundary mediated extra tensile strength and pla sticity in high entropy alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2025. 200: p. 106106

  14. [22]

    , Irradiation hardening behavior of high entropy alloys using random field theory informed discrete dislocation dynamics simulation

    Chen Y., Wang S., Feng H., Li W., Liu B., Li J., Liu Y., Liaw P.K., Fang Q. , Irradiation hardening behavior of high entropy alloys using random field theory informed discrete dislocation dynamics simulation. International Journal of Plasticity, 2023. 162: p. 103497

  15. [23]

    , The effect of local chemical ordering on Frank - Read source activation in a refractory multi-principal element alloy

    Smith L.T.W., Su Y., Xu S., Hunter A., Beyerlein I.J. , The effect of local chemical ordering on Frank - Read source activation in a refractory multi-principal element alloy. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020. 134: p. 102850

  16. [24]

    , The predicted rate -dependent deformation behaviour and multistage strain hardening in a model heterostructured body-centered cubic high entropy alloy

    Peng J., Li L., Li F., Liu B., Zherebtsov S., Fang Q., Li J., Stepanov N., Liu Y., Liu F., Liaw P.K. , The predicted rate -dependent deformation behaviour and multistage strain hardening in a model heterostructured body-centered cubic high entropy alloy. International Journal ...

  17. [25]

    , Developing an analytical bond -order potential for Hf/Nb/Ta/Zr/C syste m using machine learning global optimization

    Wu Y., Yu W., Shen S. , Developing an analytical bond -order potential for Hf/Nb/Ta/Zr/C syste m using machine learning global optimization. Ceramics International, 2023. 49(21): p. 34255-34268

  18. [26]

    , MEAMfit: A reference -free modified embedded atom method (RF -MEAM) energy and force -fitting code

    Duff A.I., Finnis M.W., Maugis P., Thijsse B.J., Sluiter M.H.F. , MEAMfit: A reference -free modified embedded atom method (RF -MEAM) energy and force -fitting code. Computer Physics Communications,

  19. [27]

    Scripta Materialia, 2022

    Ji W., Wu M.S., Inhibiting the inverse Hall-Petch behavior in CoCuFeNiPd high-entropy alloys with short- range ordering and grain boundary segregation. Scripta Materialia, 2022. 221: p. 114950

  20. [28]

    -W., Hall-Petch and inverse Hall -Petch relations in high -entropy CoNiFeAlxCu1 -x alloys

    Chen S., Aitken Z.H., Wu Z., Yu Z., Banerjee R., Zhang Y. -W., Hall-Petch and inverse Hall -Petch relations in high -entropy CoNiFeAlxCu1 -x alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2020. 773: p. 138873

  21. [29]

    Materials Today Communications,

    Xie L., Wu G., Peng Q., Liu J., Li D., Wang W., An atomistic study on grain-size and temperature effects on mechanical properties of polycrystal CoCrFeNi high -entropy alloys. Materials Today Communications,

  22. [30]

    Computational Materials Science, 2024

    Chen J., Hou Z., Wang Z., Li K., Zou P., Dong K., S hi G., Quantitative analysis of multiple deformation mechanisms in NiCrCoFe high-entropy alloy. Computational Materials Science, 2024. 238: p. 112926

  23. [31]

    , Unraveling the dislocation–precipitate interactions in high-entropy alloys

    Li J., Chen H., Fang Q., Jiang C., Liu Y., Liaw P.K. , Unraveling the dislocation–precipitate interactions in high-entropy alloys. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020. 133: p. 102819

  24. [32]

    , Atomistic simulation for deforming complex alloys with application toward TWIP steel and associat ed physical insights

    Wang P., Xu S., Liu J., Li X., Wei Y., Wang H., Gao H., Yang W. , Atomistic simulation for deforming complex alloys with application toward TWIP steel and associat ed physical insights. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2017. 98: p. 290-308

  25. [33]

    Extreme Mechanics Letters, 2017

    Wang P., Wu Y., Liu J., Wang H., Impacts of atomic scale lattice distortion on dislocation activity in high- entropy alloys. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 2017. 17: p. 38-42

  26. [34]

    , Misfit-energy-increasing dislocations in vapor -deposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers

    Zhou X.W., Johnson R.A., Wadley H.N.G. , Misfit-energy-increasing dislocations in vapor -deposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers. Physical Review B, 2004. 69(14): p. 144113

  27. [35]

    , Trends in the elast ic response of binary early transition metal nitrides

    Holec D., Friá k M., Neugebauer J., Mayrhofer P.H. , Trends in the elast ic response of binary early transition metal nitrides. Physical Review B, 2012. 85(6): p. 064101

  28. [36]

    Journal of Materials Research and Technology,

    Wu Y., Yan G., Yu W., Shen S., Investigating nanostructure-property relationship of WTaVCr high-entropy alloy via machine learning optimized reactive pot ential. Journal of Materials Research and Technology,

  29. [37]

    , Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm I

    Mü hlenbein H., Schlierkamp -Voosen D. , Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm I. Continuous Parameter Optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 1993. 1(1): p. 25-49

  30. [38]

    , An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives

    Powell M.J.D. , An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. The Computer Journal, 1964. 7(2): p. 155-162

  31. [39]

    Physical Review B, 1989

    Johnson R.A., Alloy models with the embedded -atom method. Physical Review B, 1989. 39(17): p. 12554- 12559

  32. [40]

    , Atomsk: A tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files

    Hirel P. , Atomsk: A tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files. Computer Physics Communications, 2015. 197: p. 212-219

  33. [41]

    , Atomistic simulation o f chemical short -range order on the irradiation resistance of HfNbTaTiZr high entropy alloy

    Mo Y., Liang Y., Guo W., Tian Y., Wan Q. , Atomistic simulation o f chemical short -range order on the irradiation resistance of HfNbTaTiZr high entropy alloy. International Journal of Plasticity, 2024. 183: p. 104155

  34. [42]

    Acta Materialia, 2016

    Maiti S., Steurer W., Structural-disorder and its effect on mechanical properties in single -phase TaNbHfZr high-entropy alloy. Acta Materialia, 2016. 106: p. 87-97

  35. [43]

    , Research on optimizing strength and ductility of HfNbTaZr dual -phase high -entropy alloy by tuning chemical short -range order

    Guo S., Wang M., Sui S., Li J., Chen H., Hao X., Zhao X., Lin X. , Research on optimizing strength and ductility of HfNbTaZr dual -phase high -entropy alloy by tuning chemical short -range order. International 34 Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2022. 108: p. 105942

  36. [44]

    , Molecular dynamics simulations of the structure and mechanical properties of silica glass using ReaxFF

    Chowdhury S.C., Haque B.Z., Gillespie J.W. , Molecular dynamics simulations of the structure and mechanical properties of silica glass using ReaxFF . Journal of Materials Science, 2016. 51(22): p. 10139 - 10159

  37. [45]

    Nature communications, 2014

    Sen F.G., Alpas A.T., van Duin A.C.T., Qi Y., Oxidation-assisted ductility of aluminium nanowires. Nature communications, 2014. 5: p. 3959

  38. [46]

    Physical Review A, 1985

    Hoover W.G., Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Physical Review A, 1985. 31(3): p. 1695-1697

  39. [47]

    , Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short -Range Molecular Dynamics

    Plimpton S. , Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short -Range Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995. 117(1): p. 1-19

  40. [48]

    Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2010

    Alexander S., Visualization and analysis o f atomistic simulation data with OVITO –the Open Visualization Tool. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2010. 18(1): p. 015012

  41. [49]

    , Extracting dislocations and non -dislocation crystal defects from atomistic simulation data

    Stukowski A., Albe K. , Extracting dislocations and non -dislocation crystal defects from atomistic simulation data. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2010. 18(8): p. 085001

  42. [50]

    , Modeling the yield strength of nanocrystalline metals

    Ma Y., He Y., Yang J., Dong P., Li Z., Ma J., Chen L., Li W. , Modeling the yield strength of nanocrystalline metals. International Journal of Plasticity, 2024. 179: p. 104039

  43. [51]

    , Strength can be controlled by edge dislocations in refractory high -entropy alloys

    Lee C., Maresca F., Feng R., Chou Y., Ungar T., Widom M., An K., Poplawsky J.D., Chou Y.-C., Liaw P.K., Curtin W.A. , Strength can be controlled by edge dislocations in refractory high -entropy alloys. Nature Communications, 2021. 12(1): p. 5474

  44. [52]

    , Temperature dependence of elastic and plastic deformation behavior of a refractory high - entropy alloy

    Lee C., Kim G., Chou Y., Musicó B.L., Gao M.C., An K., Song G., Chou Y.-C., Keppens V ., Chen W., Liaw P.K. , Temperature dependence of elastic and plastic deformation behavior of a refractory high - entropy alloy. Science Advances. 6(37): p. eaaz4748

  45. [53]

    , Strain hardening and embrittlement of Al crystal with a surface oxidized void

    Wu Y., Yu W., Shen S. , Strain hardening and embrittlement of Al crystal with a surface oxidized void. Mechanics of Materials, 2020. 148: p. 103531

  46. [54]

    International Journal of Plasticity, 2011

    Lubarda V .A., Emission of dislocations from nanovoids under combine d loading. International Journal of Plasticity, 2011. 27(2): p. 181-200

  47. [55]

    Physical Review Letters, 2004

    Seppä lä E.T., Belak J., Rudd R.E., Onset of Void Coalescence during Dynamic Fracture of Ductile Metals. Physical Review Letters, 2004. 93(24): p. 245503

  48. [56]

    , Twin nucleation in Fe -based bcc alloys —modeling and experiments

    Ojha A., Sehitoglu H., Patriarca L., Maier H.J. , Twin nucleation in Fe -based bcc alloys —modeling and experiments. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2014. 22(7): p. 075010

  49. [57]

    , Competition between full slip and twinning in BCC -Fe: Effect of preloaded stress and temperature

    Veerababu J., Nagesha A. , Competition between full slip and twinning in BCC -Fe: Effect of preloaded stress and temperature. Journal of Applied Physics, 2023. 134(5): p. 055102

  50. [58]

    -J., Sheng H., Ma E

    Li Q. -J., Sheng H., Ma E. , Strengthening in multi -principal element alloys with local -chemical-order roughened dislocation pathways. Nature Communications, 2019. 10(1): p. 3563

  51. [59]

    -J., Han W

    Yang P.-J., Li Q. -J., Han W. -Z., Li J., Ma E. , Designing solid solution hardening to retain uniform ductility while quadrupling yield strength. Acta Materialia, 2019. 179: p. 107-118

  52. [60]

    , Extra strengthening and work hardening in gradient nanotwinned metals

    Cheng Z., Zhou H., Lu Q., Gao H., Lu L. , Extra strengthening and work hardening in gradient nanotwinned metals. Science, 2018. 362(6414): p. eaau1925

  53. [61]

    , Insights into orientation -dependent plasticity deformation of HfNbTaTiZr refractory high entropy alloy: An atomistic investigation

    Jian W., Ren L. , Insights into orientation -dependent plasticity deformation of HfNbTaTiZr refractory high entropy alloy: An atomistic investigation. International Journal of Plasticity, 2024. 173: p. 103867

  54. [62]

    , Nanostructure-property relation of Σ5 grain boundary in HfNbZrTi high-entropy alloy under shear

    Li J., Wu Y., Bai Z., Yu W., Shen S. , Nanostructure-property relation of Σ5 grain boundary in HfNbZrTi high-entropy alloy under shear. Journal of Materials Science, 2023. 58(15): p. 6757-6774

  55. [63]

    , Grain boundary structure and mobility in high -entropy alloys: A comparative molecular dynamics study on a Σ11 symmetrical tilt grain boundary in face -centered cubic 35 CuNiCoFe

    Utt D., Stukowski A., Albe K. , Grain boundary structure and mobility in high -entropy alloys: A comparative molecular dynamics study on a Σ11 symmetrical tilt grain boundary in face -centered cubic 35 CuNiCoFe. Acta Materialia, 2020. 186: p. 11-19

  56. [64]

    -W., Atomistic modeling of nanoscale plasticity in high -entropy alloys

    Aitken Z.H., Sorkin V ., Zhang Y. -W., Atomistic modeling of nanoscale plasticity in high -entropy alloys. Journal of Materials Research, 2019. 34(9): p. 1509-1532

  57. [65]

    , Misorientation-dependent t ransition between grain boundary migration and sliding in FCC metals

    Huang Q., Zhao Q., Zhou H., Yang W. , Misorientation-dependent t ransition between grain boundary migration and sliding in FCC metals. International Journal of Plasticity, 2022. 159: p. 103466

  58. [66]

    , Twin boundary migration and reactions with stacking fau lt tetrahedron in Cu and CoCrCuFeNi high -entropy alloy

    Fu T., Hu H., Hu S., Liang Q., Weng S., Zhao Y., Chen X., Peng X. , Twin boundary migration and reactions with stacking fau lt tetrahedron in Cu and CoCrCuFeNi high -entropy alloy. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2022. 17: p. 282-292

  59. [67]

    , The optimum grain size for strength-ductility combination in metals

    Wang Y., Huang C., Ma X., Zhao J., Guo F., Fang X., Zhu Y., Wei Y. , The optimum grain size for strength-ductility combination in metals. International Journal of Plasticity, 2023. 164: p. 103574

  60. [68]

    , The α -factor in the Taylor flow -stress law in monotonic, cyclic and quasi -stationary deformations: Dependence on slip mode, dislocation arrangement and density

    Mughrabi H. , The α -factor in the Taylor flow -stress law in monotonic, cyclic and quasi -stationary deformations: Dependence on slip mode, dislocation arrangement and density. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 2016. 20(6): p. 411-420

  61. [69]

    , Dislocation density model for the effect of grain size on the flow stress of a Ti–15.2 at.% Mo β-alloy at 4.2–650K

    Chia K.-H., Jung K., Conrad H. , Dislocation density model for the effect of grain size on the flow stress of a Ti–15.2 at.% Mo β-alloy at 4.2–650K. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2005. 409(1): p. 32-38

  62. [70]

    Physical Review Letters, 2006

    Louchet F., Weiss J., Richeton T., Hall-Petch Law Revisited in Terms of Collective Dislocation Dynamics. Physical Review Letters, 2006. 97(7): p. 075504

  63. [71]

    , Peierls barriers and stresses for edge dislocations in Pd and Al calculated from first principles

    Hartford J., von Sydow B., Wa hnströ m G., Lundqvist B.I. , Peierls barriers and stresses for edge dislocations in Pd and Al calculated from first principles. Physical Review B, 1998. 58(5): p. 2487-2496

  64. [72]

    Physical Review B, 2000

    Lu G., Kioussis N., Bulatov V .V ., Kaxiras E., Generalized-stacking-fault energy surface and dislocation properties of aluminum. Physical Review B, 2000. 62(5): p. 3099-3108

  65. [73]

    , Delay of inverse Hall -Petch relationship of nanocrystalline Cu by modifying grain boundaries with coherent twins

    Hu H., Fu T., Li C., Weng S., Zhao Y., Chen X., Peng X. , Delay of inverse Hall -Petch relationship of nanocrystalline Cu by modifying grain boundaries with coherent twins. Physical Review B, 2022. 105(2): p. 024107

  66. [74]

    , Ultimate Strength of Metals

    Chandross M., Argibay N. , Ultimate Strength of Metals. Physical Review Letters, 2020. 124(12): p. 125501

  67. [75]

    , Revisited Storage and Dynamic Recovery of Dislocation Density Evolution Law: Toward a Generalized Kocks–Mecking Model of Strain -Hardening

    Bouaziz O. , Revisited Storage and Dynamic Recovery of Dislocation Density Evolution Law: Toward a Generalized Kocks–Mecking Model of Strain -Hardening. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2012. 14(9): p. 759-761

  68. [76]

    , Reverse analysis of nano -indentation using different representative strains and residual indentation profiles

    Lee J., Lee C., Kim B. , Reverse analysis of nano -indentation using different representative strains and residual indentation profiles. Materials & Design, 2009. 30(9): p. 3395-3404

  69. [77]

    -K., Kim Y

    Kang S. -K., Kim Y. -C., Kim K. -H., Kwon D., Kim J. -Y., Constitutive equations optimized for determining strengths of metallic alloys. Mechanics of Materials, 2014. 73: p. 51-57

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.