Integrated bright source of polarization-entangled photons using lithium niobate photonic chips

Changhyun Kim; Hansol Kim; Hojoong Jung; Hyeon Hwang; Hyounghan Kwon; Jinil Lee; Junhyung Lee; Minho Choi; Min-kyo Seo; Sunghyun Moon

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Integrated bright source of polarization-entangled photons using lithium niobate photonic chips

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A thin-film lithium niobate photonic chip now generates polarization-entangled Bell states with high purity, concurrence, and fidelity, marking the first polarization entanglement on this platform.

desk verdict A credible first demonstration of polarization-entangled Bell states on TFLN, with a brightness claim that overreaches its evidence and should be corrected in review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23625 v1 pith:X6UZSMVX submitted 2025-06-30 physics.optics quant-ph

Changhyun Kim , Hansol Kim , Minho Choi , Junhyung Lee , Yongchan Park , Sunghyun Moon , Jinil Lee , Hyeon Hwang

show 5 more authors

Min-Kyo Seo Yoon-Ho Kim Yong-Su Kim Hojoong Jung Hyounghan Kwon

This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsquant-ph

keywords thin-filmlithiumniobatepolarization-entangledBellstatesspontaneousparametricdown-conversionperiodicallypoledpolarizationsplitter-rotatorintegratedquantumphotonicsstatetomography

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first polarization-entangled Bell state generated on a thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) photonic chip. A continuous-wave pump is split by a multimode interferometer into two paths, each containing a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide that emits pairs of horizontally polarized photons; a polarization splitter-rotator then converts the resulting spatial entanglement into polarization entanglement of the form $\sqrt{\eta}|HH\rangle + \sqrt{1-\eta}e^{i2\phi}|VV\rangle$. Quantum state tomography gives a purity of 0.901, a concurrence of 0.900 (an entanglement measure), and a fidelity of 0.944, with an on-chip pair-generation brightness of 508.5 MHz/mW. If correct, this gives integrated quantum photonics a compact, bright source of the Bell states needed for quantum communication, networking, and measurement-based computing, without requiring pulsed pumps or bulk optics.

What carries the argument

The working mechanism is the combination of three components. A multimode interferometer splits the coherent pump evenly into two spatial paths; two periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides perform type-0 spontaneous parametric down-conversion in each path, producing pairs of horizontally polarized photons; and a polarization splitter-rotator (PSR) routes one path's photons to the through port while rotating the other path's polarization from TE to TM. Because both photons of a pair stay together in one spatial mode, the PSR erases the which-path information and leaves the polarization-entangled state $\sqrt{\eta}|HH\rangle + \sqrt{1-\eta}e^{i2\phi}|VV\rangle$. The relative efficiency $\eta$ and phase $\phi$ are set by the waveguide efficiencies, PSR coupling, and mode dispersion, and are measured experimentally.

What would settle it

Measure the PSR extinction ratio by launching TE and TM light into the device; if the through-port crosstalk exceeds roughly a few percent, the neglected crosstalk term in the state description would account for the difference between the measured and ideal density matrices. Alternatively, repeat the quantum state tomography without accidental-coincidence subtraction; if the fidelity and concurrence fall markedly below the reported values, the entanglement metrics rely on the subtraction rather than on coherent which-path erasure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a TFLN chip combining a 1x2 multimode interferometer, two independent periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides, and a polarization splitter-rotator produces a high-quality polarization-entangled two-photon state under continuous-wave pumping. The paper shows that spatial entanglement between the two down-conversion paths is coherently converted to polarization entanglement, with the final state $\sqrt{\eta}|HH\rangle + \sqrt{1-\eta}e^{i2\phi}|VV\rangle$, and verifies the state by full quantum state tomography. The measured quality metrics, purity $0.901 \pm 0.012$, concurrence $0.900 \pm 0.012$, and fidelity $0.944 \pm 0.007$, together with the brightness of 508.5 MHz/mW, are the experimental evidence that the device works as a Bell-state source. This is described as the first demonstration of polarization entanglement on a TFLN platform.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the polarization splitter-rotator fully erases which-path information, so the two down-conversion paths overlap coherently as one quantum state; if residual polarization crosstalk or path asymmetry retains any which-path tag, the state becomes a mixture and the reported concurrence and fidelity would drop.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

TFLN can now serve as a platform for polarization-encoded Bell states, complementing the previously demonstrated time-bin entangled sources on the same material.
The continuous-wave operation and on-chip brightness of 508.5 MHz/mW make the source practical for quantum communication and networking without pulsed-laser synchronization.
Degenerate photon pairs with a large spectral separation from the pump are generated from a single pump, simplifying pump filtering relative to four-wave-mixing sources.
Adding integrated variable optical attenuators and phase shifters should allow active balancing of $\eta$ and $\phi$, improving concurrence and purity beyond the reported values.
The same architecture can be extended to non-degenerate frequencies and to higher-dimensional encoding by combining polarization with time-bin or frequency-bin degrees of freedom.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The authors do not explicitly compare spectral brightness (brightness per unit bandwidth), so a fair platform comparison with microresonator or four-wave-mixing sources would need to normalize the 508.5 MHz/mW figure by the phase-matching bandwidth.
If the PSR's residual polarization crosstalk is indeed the dominant imperfection, then measuring the extinction ratio of the PSR as a function of wavelength would predict the achievable ceiling for concurrence and purity in this architecture.
The same spatial-to-polarization conversion idea could be applied to other nonlinear integrated platforms and to non-degenerate SPDC, enabling wavelength-multiplexed entangled sources from a single chip.
A direct test of the which-path-erasure assumption would be to add a controllable phase or loss on one path and observe the expected sinusoidal variation in the $|HH\rangle$/$|VV\rangle$ coherence terms of the density matrix.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The headline result is real: this is the first polarization-entangled Bell state generated on a thin-film lithium niobate chip. The QST metrics—concurrence 0.900, fidelity 0.944, purity 0.901, with uncertainties from 30 repetitions—are strong and mutually consistent. The architecture is adapted from silicon, as the authors acknowledge, but the transfer to TFLN with CW pumping is a meaningful milestone, not a trivial copy. The paper also does the building-block homework: SHG spectra, coincidence-versus-power linearity, and PSR characterization are all there. The visibility numbers (98.33% and 97.36%) and the single-photon tomography results are presented with honest caveats. The Discussion names the main limiter—residual polarization crosstalk from the PSR—which is the right thing to flag.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The "bright" in the title and the abstract's "surpassing silicon photonics" rest on the 508.5 MHz/mW on-chip brightness, and that number is not what the full source produces. It is an estimate from a single reference PPLN waveguide, converted to on-chip using only the minimum measured facet coupling losses. The MMI and PSR insertion losses are not included, no error bars are given, and no full-device brightness is reported in the entanglement configuration. Comparing that to silicon sources is not apples-to-apples. This overstates the demonstrated capability and should be fixed, either by presenting the building-block number with clearer labeling or by measuring the integrated source's brightness directly. The fidelity is also computed after maximizing over the local phase; that is a standard fitting step but deserves a clearer disclosure than one clause. The "first realization" claim looks plausible given the cited literature, but a more exhaustive prior-art check would make it bulletproof.

The entanglement evidence itself holds up. The state is characterized by direct tomography, not derived from an assumption that already contains the answer. The paper is honest about where imperfections enter. I disagree with the stress-test note insofar as it suggests the brightness issue undermines the main claim; it does not. But the note correctly identifies a gap between what was measured and what is advertised.

Who is this for? Experimentalists in integrated quantum photonics, especially those working on TFLN platforms and on-chip entanglement sources. They will read it as a solid platform demonstration and a useful benchmark. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. The referee should ask for a corrected or clarified brightness accounting, a more prominent disclosure of the phase-maximization step, and ideally a full-device pair-generation rate. With those changes, this is a publishable and citable result.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an integrated thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) source designed to generate polarization-entangled photon pairs. A continuous-wave pump is split by a 1x2 multimode interferometer into two periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) waveguides; type-0 SPDC creates H-polarized pairs in each path, and a polarization splitter-rotator (PSR) converts the spatial entanglement into polarization entanglement in a common output mode. The authors characterize the PPLN and PSR building blocks, then perform 36-basis quantum state tomography with 30 repetitions. They report spectral visibilities of 98.33% and 97.36%, a two-photon purity of 0.901 +/- 0.012, concurrence of 0.900 +/- 0.012, fidelity of 0.944 +/- 0.007, and an on-chip SPDC brightness of 508.5 MHz/mW estimated from a reference PPLN waveguide.

Significance. The entanglement demonstration is the central contribution: if the measured density matrix is accepted, this is the first polarization-entangled state generated on a TFLN chip, achieved with a compact, continuous-wave-pumped architecture. The quantum state tomography is thorough, with 36 measurement bases, 30 repetitions, accidental-count subtraction, and error bars, and the reported purity and concurrence are high. The fact that two independent PPLN waveguides can be coherently combined into a nearly pure entangled state is a nontrivial experimental result. The brightness claim is also potentially important, but as reported it is a building-block figure rather than a full-device brightness, and the comparison with silicon integrated sources is not like-for-like.

major comments (3)

[Design and validation of building blocks] The headline brightness value of 508.5 MHz/mW is extracted from a reference straight PPLN waveguide (Fig. 2d), not from the integrated MMI + PPLN + PSR source used for the entanglement measurements. The conversion to an on-chip value uses only the minimum measured facet coupling losses and does not account for the 1x2 MMI splitting loss, the PSR insertion loss and crosstalk, or any additional losses in the full device. No coincidence-rate measurement is reported for the source in its entanglement configuration, so the full-device brightness is not quantified. As a result, the abstract's statement that the device 'surpass[es] other integrated platforms including silicon photonics' is not supported by a like-for-like comparison. Please either report a full-device pair-generation rate in the entanglement configuration or explicitly relabel the 508.5 MHz/mW value as a PPLN building-block efficiency and revise the comparative claims accordingly.
[Quantum state tomography of on-chip polarization entangled states] The reported fidelity of 0.944 is not the fidelity to an ideal Bell state. The manuscript states that the fidelity calculation takes into account 'the efficiency difference between H and V polarization states observed in the single photon tomography and local phase changed determined by the maximization of the fidelity,' and the resulting parameters are eta = 0.444 and 2 phi = 0.867 rad. With these parameters the state is not maximally entangled; using the published values, the fidelity to the standard |Phi+> Bell state is approximately 0.82. Please report the fidelity to a fixed Bell state as well, and clarify whether the 0.944 value is a fidelity to a best-fit non-maximally entangled target state. The terminology 'Bell state' should also be qualified wherever a non-maximally entangled state is actually generated.
[Concept of on-chip source of polarization-entangled state] The derivation from Eq. (2) to Eq. (3) omits the role of the 50:50 beam splitter used in the QST experiment. Equation (3) describes a two-photon polarization state in a single spatial mode, while the measured coincidences are recorded after the two photons are split by a beam splitter. For two photons entering the same port of a balanced beam splitter the coincidence component does preserve the polarization-entangled form, but this step should be stated explicitly so that the measured density matrix is directly connected to the state in Eq. (3).

minor comments (5)

[Quantum state tomography of on-chip polarization entangled states] The single-photon purities in Figs. 4d and 4e are reported as 0.514 and 0.510, respectively, but the two-photon purity is 0.901. A brief explanation of why the reduced single-photon states are mixed while the two-photon state is nearly pure would help the reader understand the role of spectral or polarization correlations.
[Fig. 2 caption] The Fig. 2d caption specifies a 2 ns coincidence window, while the QST measurements use a 200 ps coincidence window. Please state explicitly which coincidence window is used for the CAR value and for the brightness fit, and whether the two-photon visibilities are affected by the choice of window.
[Design and validation of building blocks] The on-chip brightness conversion uses 'minimum measured coupling losses' but no range or uncertainty is given for the coupling loss values. Because the estimated brightness scales strongly with these losses, the extrapolated 508.5 MHz/mW value should include a conservative range or a full loss budget.
[Methods] The pump power used for the quantum state tomography measurements is not stated. Please specify the pump power and the corresponding coincidence-to-accidental ratio to demonstrate that the measurements are made in the low multi-pair regime.
[Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and spacing errors, such as 'local phase changed' instead of 'local phase change' and missing spaces between words. A careful proofread is needed before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entanglement claim rests on direct QST measurements, and the brightness figure is a stated unit-conversion estimate, not a prediction forced by the model.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Equations 1-3 are a standard coherent-state SPDC model; the parameters eta and 2phi are fitted to the measured two-photon density matrix, and the entanglement claim rests on independently measured visibilities (98.33% +/- 0.77%, 97.36% +/- 0.82%), QST purity (0.901 +/- 0.012), concurrence (0.900 +/- 0.012), and fidelity (0.944 +/- 0.007). The paper explicitly states that the fidelity accounts for the measured H/V efficiency difference and a local phase set by maximizing fidelity; this is standard state characterization, not a prediction derived from the assumed state. The brightness value 508.5 MHz/mW is obtained by converting the measured off-chip coincidence brightness 8.059 MHz/mW using stated minimum facet coupling losses (-4 dB at 1550 nm and -10 dB at 775 nm); this is an explicit unit conversion from a reference PPLN measurement, not a circular reduction, though the full integrated MMI+PSR source is not separately brightness-characterized, which is a scope limitation rather than circularity. The only self-citation ([39], the photon-counting setup) is methodological and not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum optics assumptions (SPDC, coherent MMI splitting, ideal PSR) and on measured characterization parameters. No invented entities. The main fitted parameters are η, 2φ, and sinusoidal fit coefficients; these are standard state reconstruction fits, not predictive parameters.

free parameters (3)

Normalized efficiency ratio η = 0.444
Extracted from the two-photon QST density matrix; used to describe the generated state in Eq. 3. Not independently predicted.
Relative phase 2φ = 0.867 rad
Determined by maximizing fidelity to the target Bell state; a post-hoc fit to the data.
Sinusoidal fit parameters A, B, θ0 = Not reported numerically
Used to fit the analyzer-angle visibility curves in Fig. 4b,c; standard fitting to measured coincidence counts.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Type-0 SPDC in PPLN generates photon pairs with the same TE polarization as the pump.
Standard phase-matching property assumed in Eq. 2, based on prior literature [49].
domain assumption The 1x2 MMI splits a coherent state into two equal-amplitude coherent states (Eq. 1).
Assumes an ideal symmetric 50:50 MMI with no loss or phase asymmetry.
domain assumption The PSR converts TM-mode photons in the cross port to TE mode without which-path information (Eq. 3).
Idealized model; the paper's Discussion notes residual crosstalk from PSR fabrication imperfections.
standard math Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the density matrix from projection measurements.
Standard quantum state tomography method cited as [53,54].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrated bright source of polarization-entangled photons using lithium niobate photonic chips." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X6UZSMVX

@misc{pith2026250623625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrated bright source of polarization-entangled photons using lithium niobate photonic chips},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X6UZSMVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23625}
}

read the original abstract

Quantum photonics has rapidly advanced as a key area for developing quantum technologies by harnessing photons' inherent quantum characteristics, particularly entanglement. Generation of entangled photon pairs, known as Bell states, is crucial for quantum communications, precision sensing, and quantum computing. While bulk quantum optical setups have provided foundational progress, integrated quantum photonic platforms now offer superior scalability, efficiency, and integrative potential. In this study, we demonstrate a compact and bright source of polarization-entangled Bell state utilizing continuous-wave pumping on thin film lithium niobate (TFLN) integrated photonics. Our periodically poled lithium niobate device achieves on-chip brightness of photon pair generation rate of 508.5 MHz/mW, surpassing other integrated platforms including silicon photonics. This demonstration marks the first realization of polarization entanglement on TFLN platforms. Experimentally measured metrics confirm high-quality entangled photon pairs with a purity of 0.901, a concurrence of 0.9, and a fidelity of 0.944. We expect our compact quantum devices to have great potential for advancing quantum communication systems and photonic quantum technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

O’brien, J. L. Optical quantum computing.Science 318, 1567–1570 (2007)

2007
[2]

Introductiontoopticalquantuminformationprocessing (Cambridgeuniversity press, 2010)

Kok,P.&Lovett,B.W. Introductiontoopticalquantuminformationprocessing (Cambridgeuniversity press, 2010)

work page 2010
[3]

Quantum optics: Science and technology in a new light.Science 348, 525–530 (2015)

Walmsley, I. Quantum optics: Science and technology in a new light.Science 348, 525–530 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

Nature Reviews Physics4, 194–208 (2022)

Pelucchi, E.et al.The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nature Reviews Physics4, 194–208 (2022)

2022
[5]

Entangledphoton-pairsources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals.Review of Scientific Instruments92(2021)

Anwar,A.,Perumangatt,C.,Steinlechner,F.,Jennewein,T.&Ling,A. Entangledphoton-pairsources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals.Review of Scientific Instruments92(2021)

work page 2021
[6]

F., Horne, M

Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden- variable theories.Physical review letters23, 880 (1969)

work page 1969
[7]

Yin, J. et al. Quantum teleportation and entanglement distribution over 100-kilometre free-space channels. Nature 488, 185–188 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

Satellite-basedentanglementdistributionover1200kilometers

Yin, J.etal. Satellite-basedentanglementdistributionover1200kilometers. Science 356, 1140–1144 (2017)

work page 2017

Show all 56 references

[9]

Bouwmeester, D.et al.Experimental quantum teleportation.Nature 390, 575–579 (1997)

1997
[10]

& Zeilinger, A

Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted.Physical review letters80, 3891 (1998)

1998
[11]

& Zeilinger, A

Pan, J.-W., Simon, C., Brukner, Č. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement purification for quantum communi- cation. Nature 410, 1067–1070 (2001)

2001
[12]

Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states.Nature physics3, 91–95 (2007)

Lu, C.-Y.et al. Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states.Nature physics3, 91–95 (2007)

2007
[13]

Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on bell’s theorem.Physical review letters67, 661 (1991)

1991
[14]

Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet.Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008)

2008
[15]

Liu, L.-Z.et al.Distributed quantum phase estimation with entangled photons.Nature photonics15, 137–142 (2021)

2021
[16]

Kim, D.-H. et al. Distributed quantum sensing of multiple phases with fewer photons.Nature communications 15, 266 (2024). 17

2024
[17]

& Milburn, G

Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. nature 409, 46–52 (2001)

2001
[18]

Bartolucci, S.et al.Fusion-based quantum computation.Nature Communications14, 912 (2023)

2023
[19]

& Kumar, P

Chen, J., Li, X. & Kumar, P. Two-photon-state generation via four-wave mixing in optical fibers. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics72, 033801 (2005)

2005
[20]

Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics.Science 360, 285–291 (2018)

Wang, J.et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics.Science 360, 285–291 (2018)

2018
[21]

Light: Science & Applications12, 175 (2023)

Luo, W.et al.Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet. Light: Science & Applications12, 175 (2023)

2023
[22]

Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics.Nature Photonics17, 573–581 (2023)

Bao, J.et al. Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics.Nature Photonics17, 573–581 (2023)

2023
[23]

& Yuan, Z

Wang, H., Zeng, Q., Ma, H. & Yuan, Z. Progress on chip-based spontaneous four-wave mixing quantum light sources.Advanced Devices & Instrumentation5, 0032 (2024)

2024
[24]

Quantumentanglementonphotonicchips: areview

Chen,X.,Fu,Z.,Gong,Q.&Wang,J. Quantumentanglementonphotonicchips: areview. Advanced Photonics 3, 064002–064002 (2021)

2021
[25]

Scientific reports2, 817 (2012)

Matsuda, N.et al.A monolithically integrated polarization entangled photon pair source on a silicon chip. Scientific reports2, 817 (2012)

2012
[26]

Polarization-entangled quantum frequency comb from a silicon nitride microring resonator

Wen, W.et al. Polarization-entangled quantum frequency comb from a silicon nitride microring resonator. Physical Review Applied20, 064032 (2023)

2023
[27]

& Poon, A

Zhang, Q., Wu, K. & Poon, A. W. Polarization entanglement generation in silicon nitride waveguide- coupled dual microring resonators.Optics Express32, 22804–22816 (2024)

2024
[28]

Miloshevsky,A. etal. Cmosphotonicintegratedsourceofbroadbandpolarization-entangledphotons. Optica Quantum2, 254–259 (2024)

2024
[29]

Chip-scalenonlinearphotonicsforquantumlight generation

Moody, G., Chang, L., Steiner, T.J.&Bowers, J.E. Chip-scalenonlinearphotonicsforquantumlight generation. AVS Quantum Science2 (2020)

2020
[30]

Zhu,D. etal. Integratedphotonicsonthin-filmlithiumniobate. AdvancesinOpticsandPhotonics 13, 242–352 (2021)

2021
[31]

& Fejer, M

Jankowski, M., Mishra, J. & Fejer, M. Dispersion-engineered𝜒(2) nanophotonics: a flexible tool for nonclassical light.Journal of Physics: Photonics3, 042005 (2021)

2021
[32]

Efficient parametric frequency conversion in lithium niobate nanophotonic chips

Chen, J.-y.et al. Efficient parametric frequency conversion in lithium niobate nanophotonic chips. Osa Continuum2, 2914–2924 (2019). 18

2019
[33]

S.et al.Generation of broadband correlated photon-pairs in short thin-film lithium-niobate waveguides

Elkus, B. S.et al.Generation of broadband correlated photon-pairs in short thin-film lithium-niobate waveguides. Optics express27, 38521–38531 (2019)

2019
[34]

& Mookherjea, S

Zhao, J., Ma, C., Rüsing, M. & Mookherjea, S. High quality entangled photon pair generation in periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides.Physical review letters124, 163603 (2020)

2020
[35]

Spectrally separable photon-pair generation in dispersion engineered thin-film lithium niobate

Xin, C.et al. Spectrally separable photon-pair generation in dispersion engineered thin-film lithium niobate. Optics Letters47, 2830–2833 (2022)

2022
[36]

Fang, X.-X., Wang, L. & Lu, H. Efficient generation of broadband photon pairs in shallow-etched lithium niobate nanowaveguides.Optics Express32, 22945–22954 (2024)

2024
[37]

Photon-pair generation using inverse-designed thin-film lithium niobate mode con- verters

Kwon, K.et al. Photon-pair generation using inverse-designed thin-film lithium niobate mode con- verters. APL Photonics9 (2024)

2024
[38]

Spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pair generation in small footprint x-cut periodically poled lithium niobate micro-resonator.Optics Letters49, 5379–5382 (2024)

Hwang, H.et al. Spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pair generation in small footprint x-cut periodically poled lithium niobate micro-resonator.Optics Letters49, 5379–5382 (2024)

2024
[39]

Kim,C. etal. Freeformthin-filmlithiumniobatemodeconverterforphoton-pairgeneration. Nanopho- tonics(2025)

2025
[40]

Integrated photonic platform for quantum information with continuous variables

Lenzini, F.et al. Integrated photonic platform for quantum information with continuous variables. Science advances4, eaat9331 (2018)

2018
[41]

Ultra-broadbandquadraturesqueezingwiththin-filmlithium niobate nanophotonics.Optics Letters47, 1506–1509 (2022)

Chen,P.-K.,Briggs,I.,Hou,S.&Fan,L. Ultra-broadbandquadraturesqueezingwiththin-filmlithium niobate nanophotonics.Optics Letters47, 1506–1509 (2022)

2022
[42]

Peace, D.et al.Picosecond pulsed squeezing in thin-film lithium niobate strip-loaded waveguides at telecommunication wavelengths.Journal of Physics: Photonics4, 035002 (2022)

2022
[43]

Nehra, R.et al.Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics.Science 377, 1333–1337 (2022)

2022
[44]

Park, T. et al. Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography with an integrated optical parametric oscillator.Science Advances10, eadl1814 (2024)

2024
[45]

Arge, T. N.et al. Demonstration of a squeezed light source on thin-film lithium niobate with modal phase matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16516(2024)

2024 arXiv
[46]

Zhu,D. etal. Spectralcontrolofnonclassicallightpulsesusinganintegratedthin-filmlithiumniobate modulator. Light: Science & Applications11, 327 (2022)

2022
[47]

Chapman,R.J. etal. On-chipquantuminterferencebetweenindependentlithiumniobate-on-insulator photon-pair sources.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.08378(2024)

2024 arXiv
[48]

Finco,G. etal. Time-binentangledbellstategenerationandtomographyonthin-filmlithiumniobate. npj Quantum Information10, 135 (2024). 19

2024
[49]

Silverstone, J. W.et al. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources.Nature Photonics 8, 104–108 (2014)

2014
[50]

& Bowers, J

Dai, D. & Bowers, J. E. Novel concept for ultracompact polarization splitter-rotator based on silicon nanowires. Optics express19, 10940–10949 (2011)

2011
[51]

& Xia, J

Wang, X., Pan, A., Li, T., Zeng, C. & Xia, J. Efficient polarization splitter-rotator on thin-film lithium niobate. Optics Express29, 38044–38052 (2021)

2021
[52]

Chen, Z., Yang, J., Wong, W.-H., Pun, E. Y.-B. & Wang, C. Broadband adiabatic polarization rotator-splitter based on a lithium niobate on insulator platform.Photonics Research9, 2319–2324 (2021)

2021
[53]

Quantumcomputationandquantuminformation (Cambridgeuniversity press, 2010)

Nielsen,M.A.&Chuang,I.L. Quantumcomputationandquantuminformation (Cambridgeuniversity press, 2010)

2010
[54]

F., Kwiat, P

James, D. F., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits.Physical Review A 64, 052312 (2001)

2001
[55]

Light: Science & Applications11, 93 (2022)

Lin, Z.et al.High-performance polarization management devices based on thin-film lithium niobate. Light: Science & Applications11, 93 (2022)

2022
[56]

& Kwiat, P

Kaneda, F. & Kwiat, P. G. High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing. Science advances5, eaaw8586 (2019). 20 PPLN Polarization Splitter Rotator NIR, TE Telecom, TE Telecom, TM Polarization Entanglement Spatial Entanglement Multimode Inter...

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

O’brien, J. L. Optical quantum computing.Science 318, 1567–1570 (2007)

2007

[2] [2]

Introductiontoopticalquantuminformationprocessing (Cambridgeuniversity press, 2010)

Kok,P.&Lovett,B.W. Introductiontoopticalquantuminformationprocessing (Cambridgeuniversity press, 2010)

work page 2010

[3] [3]

Quantum optics: Science and technology in a new light.Science 348, 525–530 (2015)

Walmsley, I. Quantum optics: Science and technology in a new light.Science 348, 525–530 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [4]

Nature Reviews Physics4, 194–208 (2022)

Pelucchi, E.et al.The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nature Reviews Physics4, 194–208 (2022)

2022

[5] [5]

Entangledphoton-pairsources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals.Review of Scientific Instruments92(2021)

Anwar,A.,Perumangatt,C.,Steinlechner,F.,Jennewein,T.&Ling,A. Entangledphoton-pairsources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals.Review of Scientific Instruments92(2021)

work page 2021

[6] [6]

F., Horne, M

Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden- variable theories.Physical review letters23, 880 (1969)

work page 1969

[7] [7]

Yin, J. et al. Quantum teleportation and entanglement distribution over 100-kilometre free-space channels. Nature 488, 185–188 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [8]

Satellite-basedentanglementdistributionover1200kilometers

Yin, J.etal. Satellite-basedentanglementdistributionover1200kilometers. Science 356, 1140–1144 (2017)

work page 2017