Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Searching for long-lived light neutralinos from $B$-meson decays with baryonic R-parity violation at Belle II

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that Belle II can probe baryonic R-parity-violating neutralinos with an inclusive displaced-vertex search that is one to two orders of magnitude more sensitive than all current limits.

desk verdict A genuinely new partial-reconstruction technique for displaced-vertex searches, but the reach curves rest on an unquantified 3-track-DV background assumption, so the sensitivity claim is conditional until that is demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00359 v2 pith:7R5SYBYE submitted 2025-07-01 hep-ph hep-ex

Emilie Bertholet , Claudio O. Dib , Sara P. Gandelman , Juan Carlos Helo , Valery E. Lyubovitskij , Minakshi Nayak , Nicolás A. Neill , Abner Soffer
show 1 more author
Zeren Simon Wang
This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-ex PACS 12.60.Jv13.20.He
keywords R-parityviolationneutralinoBelleIIdisplacedvertexpartialreconstructionlong-livedparticleB-mesondecaysbaryonnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a GeV-scale bino-like neutralino in supersymmetry with baryon-number-violating R-parity violation could be found at Belle II through displaced-vertex signatures, and that a new inclusive search method sees it far more efficiently than standard full reconstruction. The scenario uses two nonzero couplings: one produces the neutralino in $B^+\to p\,\tilde\chi_1^0$, and the other makes it decay inside the tracking volume into a baryon and a meson. The paper computes the relevant decay rates and estimates track-reconstruction efficiencies as functions of neutralino mass and lifetime. It then shows that even with $1\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ of data, the inclusive search is one to two orders of magnitude more sensitive than the existing limits from dinucleon decay, baryon-antibaryon oscillations, and $B^+\to p+\mathrm{missing}$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the partial-reconstruction mass measurement: for each two-body decay $B^+\to p\,\tilde\chi_1^0$ in which only the prompt proton and the displaced tracks are seen, four-momentum conservation, the known $B$ mass, the beam energy, and the measured flight direction of the neutralino fix all kinematics up to a quadratic equation, whose discriminant $D$ and two roots $m_\pm$ serve both as background suppressors and as a mass estimator. The argument also relies on the hadronic transition form factors given in the appendix, which convert the parton-level couplings into the five dominant neutralino decay widths, and on the geometric tracking-efficiency model that maps a proper decay length into a reconstruction probability.

What would settle it

Count three-track displaced vertices with $m_{\rm DV}>1.5$ GeV and $r_{\rm DV}>1$ cm in the $m_\pm$ sidebands of the first $1\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ of Belle II data; if the yield near the signal regions exceeds the single-event expectation, the $N_S=3$ threshold used for the exclusion curves is invalid and the claimed reach shrinks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Belle II, using only $1\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ of data, can probe the RPV couplings $\lambda''_{113}/m_{\tilde q}^2$ and $\lambda''_{212}/m_{\tilde q}^2$ for neutralino masses between 2.7 and 4.3 GeV well beyond every existing laboratory constraint. The signal is $B^+\to p\,\tilde\chi_1^0$ followed by $\tilde\chi_1^0\to \mathcal{B}\mathcal{M}$ inside the tracker; requiring a prompt proton, a displaced vertex with at least three tracks of invariant mass above 1.5 GeV, and the kinematic selections $D\ge0$ and the $m_\pm$ window reduces all modeled background to the single-event level. The inclusive partial-reconstruction technique computes a neutralino-candidate mass from a quadratic equation with eight unknowns and eight constraints, and thereby uses 82 to 91 percent of neutralino decays rather than the sub-percent efficiency of full reconstruction. The paper concludes that the resulting three-event threshold for 95 percent confidence exclusion makes Belle II more sensitive by one to two orders of magnitude than current bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The reach assumes that requiring at least three displaced tracks with invariant mass above 1.5 GeV, $r_{\rm DV}>1$ cm, $D\ge0$, and the $m_\pm$ window suppresses all non-signal displaced-vertex background to below one event, an estimate extrapolated from the 273 two-track displaced vertices seen in an earlier Belle search rather than from a measured three-track sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With $1\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ of data, the inclusive search would probe $\lambda''_{113}/m_{\tilde q}^2$ and $\lambda''_{212}/m_{\tilde q}^2$ one to two orders of magnitude below the current dinucleon, baryon-antibaryon oscillation, and $B^+\to p+\mathrm{missing}$ bounds.
  • At the planned $50\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ sample, the same reach extends by roughly a factor of seven in each coupling over mass-squared, since the sensitivity scales with the square root of integrated luminosity.
  • The inclusive method is about a factor of ten more sensitive than the exclusive fully reconstructed channels, whose small final-state branching fractions dominate their inefficiency.
  • An observed signal would yield the neutralino mass from the $m_+$ and $m_-$ solutions, not merely an event excess.
  • A displaced-vertex-free version of the exclusive search could also discover the unmeasured Cabibbo-suppressed Standard Model modes $B^+\to p\,\bar\Xi_c^+\pi^-$, $B^+\to p\,\bar\Omega_c^0\bar K^0$, and $B^+\to p\,\bar\Lambda_c^- K^+$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The partial-reconstruction kinematic trick is generic: any long-lived neutral particle produced in a two-body $B$ decay with a visible recoil track could be mass-measured this way, so the method transfers to other long-lived-particle searches beyond RPV neutralinos.
  • Since the three-track displaced-vertex background is extrapolated from a measured two-track sample, a dedicated Belle II measurement of three-track displaced vertices in control regions would be the fastest experimental check of the claimed reach.
  • If the background estimate is too optimistic, the additional suppression measures described in the paper, such as requiring four tracks or a same-charge proton, could restore the search at the cost of a few tens of percent of efficiency, so the qualitative conclusion of superiority may survive even then.
  • The same $m_\pm$ variable could serve as an on-shell mass probe in other $B$-factory searches for semi-invisible decays, since it turns a missing-energy signature into a reconstructed invariant mass when the long-lived particle decays in the tracker.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies a supersymmetric scenario with two non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings, λ''_113 and λ''_212, in which a GeV-scale bino-like neutralino is produced in B+→p χ˜0_1 and decays via χ˜0_1→baryon+meson. The authors compute the neutralino decay widths using hadronic form factors from QCD sum rules, review existing bounds, and propose a novel inclusive partial-reconstruction search at Belle II that uses displaced vertices with at least three tracks, alongside an exclusive fully reconstructed search. Using the TrackEff package and simplified MC samples, they estimate reconstruction efficiencies and present projected 95% CL exclusion curves in the λ''_113/m^2_squark versus λ''_212/m^2_squark plane for integrated luminosities of 1 ab^-1 and 50 ab^-1, claiming sensitivity one to two orders of magnitude beyond current limits from dinucleon decay, baryon-antibaryon oscillations, and BABAR's B+→p+missing search.

Significance. If the background assumption is validated, the partial-reconstruction technique is a genuinely useful contribution: it avoids the small branching fractions of specific neutralino decay chains and the low efficiency of full B-meson reconstruction, and the m± mass variables provide kinematic information despite incomplete reconstruction. The manuscript is careful in its analytic formulas, and the use of a public track-efficiency tool and explicit MC event generation is a strength. However, the central sensitivity claim rests on an untested assertion about the three-track displaced-vertex background, which the paper itself defers to future data analysis. Because the projected reach curves in Fig. 9 and the quantitative comparison with existing bounds depend directly on that assumption, the claim should be considered conditional until the background is estimated from data or a more complete simulation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2.2 and Sec. 4] The central sensitivity claim, Eqs. (4.1)–(4.3) and Fig. 9, assumes that the three-track displaced-vertex background after the D≥0 and m± selections is at the single-event level, and Sec. 4 sets the 95% CL threshold at N_S=3. The only quantitative anchor is the 273 two-track DVs in 915 fb^-1 from Ref. [70] with 0.520<mDV<1.638 GeV, and the text explicitly states it is not known what fraction would survive mDV>1.5 GeV. The simplified background MC models only e+e−→BbarB and sbar-s events with a K_S decay as the DV; it does not simulate material interactions or coincidental third-track crossings, which the text itself identifies as the dominant expected sources after K_S/Λ vetoes. A true background of O(1) event per ab^-1 would change the exclusion threshold materially. A quantitative estimate of the three-track DV yield, from data control samples, event mixing as outlined in Sec. 3.2.3, or a full detector simulation including material, is load-bearing and should be provided, or the reach claims should be correspondingly weakened.
  2. [Sec. 2, text below Eq. (2.11)] The neutralino width calculation contains a GIM-like cancellation: for fully degenerate squarks the inclusive three-body width vanishes, and the authors estimate it by retaining a single diagram, claiming O(1) accuracy. This uncertainty propagates into both cτ and B(χ˜0_1→≥4 tracks), which appear in Eq. (4.1) and in the sensitivity curves of Fig. 9. An O(1) error in the total width changes cτ by a factor O(1), which can shift the efficiency in Fig. 7 by a comparable amount for lifetimes near the edges of the fiducial volume. The authors should quantify this effect, for example by varying the squark mass splittings or by giving an explicit estimate of the neglected diagrams, and state how the reach curves depend on this uncertainty.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.2, background retention fractions] The retention factors of 0.5%–7% for background after the m± selection are derived from the simplified MC with K_S-type DVs, not from the baseline three-track background sources. These factors are then used to argue that at most 9% of the baseline background survives the m± region for any mass hypothesis. This extrapolation is not justified unless the kinematic distributions of material-interaction and coincidental-crossing backgrounds are similar to those of K_S decays. The paper should either model these sources explicitly or clearly label the retention factors as applying only to the modeled K_S-type background, with the implication for the final background estimate stated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 6] The axis label 'Mev' should be 'MeV', and the x-axis tick labels '10 1', '100', etc. appear garbled in the text version and should be formatted as superscripts.
  2. [Sec. 2.1 and Table 3] The translation of dinucleon-decay and baryon-antibaryon-oscillation bounds into coupling limits relies on hadronic estimates such as κ∼0.01 GeV^3 and the matrix element in Eq. (2.13); the paper does not quote uncertainties on these bounds. Since the comparison in Sec. 4 is against these values, a sentence quantifying their rough order-of-magnitude nature would be helpful.
  3. [Sec. 3.3] The exclusive search uses branching fractions with large uncertainties, notably B(Ξ_c+→Ξ−π+π+)=1.9% with a 45% relative uncertainty, and B(Ω_c0→Ω−π+) is only estimated; these uncertainties are not propagated into the exclusive curves of Fig. 10.
  4. [Sec. 3.4] TrackEff is a geometric estimator and not a full Belle II detector simulation; the paper should state explicitly that the absolute efficiencies in Figs. 7 and 8 may carry a systematic offset relative to data and that the sensitivity projections inherit this offset.
  5. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.1)] The definition of B(χ˜0_1→≥4 tracks) and its relation to the requirement of at least three detected DV tracks could be clarified; the text gives numerical values only at two masses and does not show the final-state composition that leads to the 0.82–0.91 range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Belle II reach is derived from an explicit Lagrangian, external hadronic inputs, and a public detector model; the few self-citations are inputs rather than reductions.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The neutralino production and decay rates are computed from the explicit Lagrangian terms in Eqs. (2.2)-(2.4) and the width formula in Eq. (2.8), using hadronic form factors given in Appendix A whose couplings beta_B are taken from QCD sum-rule evaluations Refs. [58, 59] and meson constants from Ref. [7]. Nothing in the signal yield formulas (4.1)-(4.3) is fitted to Belle II data or to the comparison bounds. The tracking efficiency is obtained from the public TrackEff package [55, 78], which is a parameterized geometric model with stated assumptions, not a fit to the proposed signal or to the couplings being probed. The comparison limits come from independent experiments: Super-Kamiokande dinucleon searches, baryon-antibaryon oscillation estimates, and the BABAR B+ -> p + missing search. The paper does cite prior work by overlapping authors for the B+ -> p chi width and the form-factor formalism (Ref. [48]), but this is a normal use of a previously published calculation, not an unverified self-citation invoked to forbid alternatives. The main weakness is the background estimate in Sec. 3.2.2, where the paper explicitly states "it is not clear what fraction would survive the mass requirement mDV > 1.5 GeV" and then asserts that three-track DVs are "much smaller" than the 273-event baseline; Sec. 3.2.3 defers a full background study. That is a correctness risk for the N_S = 3 exclusion curves, but it is not a definitional or fitted-input circularity: the reach numbers would change if the background were larger, but they would not reduce to the background assumption by construction. Overall, the paper's sensitivity estimates are self-contained against external benchmarks and no circular reduction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central projection rests on the benchmark model assumptions (pure bino, only lambda'' UDD, degenerate squarks), external hadronic inputs (beta_B, D, F, decay constants), and on two unvalidated experimental estimates: the track-reconstruction efficiency from a parameterized model and the negligibility of 3-track DV backgrounds. The paper computes the width from first principles given these inputs; no parameter is fitted to the target observable, but the O(1) uncertainty in the inputs is not propagated into the final sensitivity contours.

free parameters (5)
  • Baryon couplings beta_B = 0.835 to 2.325 x 10^-2 GeV^3 (Table 1)
    QCD sum-rule inputs from Refs. [56,57] set the neutralino partial widths into the five dominant channels; O(1) uncertainty not propagated.
  • SU(3) parameters D, F = D = 0.8, F = 0.47
    Taken from Ref. [48] for the transition form factors in Appendix A; affect all considered decay widths.
  • Hadronic matrix element in dinucleon decay = (150 MeV)^5
    Assumed after Eq. (2.13) to translate Super-K bounds into lambda'' limits; an O(1) uncertainty in the comparison baseline.
  • Baryon-antibaryon amplitude factor kappa = ~0.01 GeV^3
    From Ref. [62] in Eq. (2.12); used to map delta_BB bounds onto lambda''/m^2_squark.
  • Signal threshold for exclusion = 3 events
    Chosen in Sec. 4 under the zero-background assumption to define 95% CL exclusion curves; directly sets the reported reach.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The lightest neutralino is a pure bino LSP; all other sparticles, including squarks, are beyond LHC reach (m_squark > 1.85 TeV), and gluinos and higgsinos are decoupled.
    Sec. 1 and Sec. 2; this is the scenario being probed and justifies ignoring LHC constraints on squarks and Higgs decays.
  • domain assumption Only baryon-number-violating lambda'' UDD operators are non-vanishing; lepton-number-violating operators and lambda''_ijj vanish, avoiding proton decay and forcing the decay via lambda''212.
    Sec. 2, Eq. (2.3) and discussion; required for the two-coupling benchmark and for the choice of hadronic final states.
  • ad hoc to paper Squark masses are degenerate and squark mixing is absent; the effective neutralino width is estimated by keeping one diagram when the GIM-like cancellation would otherwise make the inclusive width vanish.
    Sec. 2, paragraph on degenerate squarks; the authors note the inclusive parton-level width vanishes for exact degeneracy, so the total width estimate depends on an ad hoc non-degenerate treatment and carries O(1) uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The B+ to p chi production width from Ref. [48] is correct.
    Sec. 2: 'We refer the reader to Ref. [48] for the calculation of this decay's width'; the event-rate formulas in Eqs. (4.1) to (4.3) inherit this input.
  • domain assumption The TrackEff parameterized model captures Belle II's track reconstruction including the 20-hit requirement.
    Sec. 3.4: 'we use a geometric estimation of the track reconstruction efficiency using the TrackEff package', explicitly in lieu of full detector simulation.
  • ad hoc to paper Three-track displaced vertices from hadronic material interactions and coincidental crossings are negligibly rare after the m_DV > 1.5 GeV and r_DV > 1 cm cuts.
    Sec. 3.2.2: asserted as 'much smaller' than the 2-track yield of 273 events per 915 fb^-1 from Ref. [70], without a quantitative background simulation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Searching for long-lived light neutralinos from $B$-meson decays with baryonic R-parity violation at Belle II." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7R5SYBYE

@misc{pith2026250700359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Searching for long-lived light neutralinos from $B$-meson decays with baryonic R-parity violation at Belle II},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7R5SYBYE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00359}
}
abstract

In a supersymmetry scenario with R-parity violation (RPV), neutralinos with GeV-scale mass, which are necessarily bino-like, are allowed by all constraints and can be produced in association with a baryon in $B$-meson decays via certain $\bar U \bar D \bar D$ operators. In this work, we investigate this scenario with two non-vanishing RPV couplings at the low-energy scale. With one RPV coupling governing the neutralino production rate and another determining its lifetime, this scenario can lead to observable signals with displaced-vertex signatures in the tracking volume of $B$-factories. To maximize the sensitivity to such signals, we develop a new partial-reconstruction technique that yields high efficiency and utilizes most of the decays of relatively heavy, long-lived particles, achieving much better sensitivity than standard full reconstruction. We consider potential background sources and devise selection criteria to suppress their event yields to very low levels. Using a parameterized model of the detector, we estimate in detail the displaced-vertex reconstruction efficiency as a function of neutralino lifetime and mass. For squark masses beyond the LHC limits, we calculate the signal sensitivity of Belle~II, showing that the experiment can probe the RPV couplings well beyond the present bounds, obtained from searches for dinucleon decays, baryon-antibaryon oscillations, and $B^+\to p +\text{missing}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Potential for the discovery of the protophobic boson at the STCF

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Detector-level simulations indicate the proposed STCF drift chamber could discover the 17 MeV protophobic X17 boson through displaced electron-positron vertices if Standard Model backgrounds stay below about 10^4 even...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [48]

    C. O. Dib, J. C. Helo, V. E. Lyubovitskij, N. A. Neill, A. Soffer, and Z. S. Wang, Probing R-parity violation in B-meson decays to a baryon and a light neutralino , JHEP 02 (2023) 224, [arXiv:2208.06421]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [70]

    Search for a heavy neutral lepton that mixes predominantly with the tau neutrino

    Belle Collaboration, M. Nayak et al., Search for a heavy neutral lepton that mixes predominantly with the tau neutrino , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 11 L111102, [arXiv:2402.02580]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, [arXiv:1207.7214]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys

    CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, [arXiv:1207.7235]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [3]

    H. P. Nilles, Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics , Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1–162. – 25 –

    work page 1984

  6. [4]

    S. P. Martin, A Supersymmetry primer , Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18 (1998) 1–98, [hep-ph/9709356]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [5]

    Gildener, Gauge Symmetry Hierarchies , Phys

    E. Gildener, Gauge Symmetry Hierarchies , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 1667

    1976

  8. [6]

    M. J. G. Veltman, The Infrared - Ultraviolet Connection , Acta Phys. Polon. B 12 (1981) 437

    work page 1981

Show all 78 references
  1. [7]

    Beringer, Programmatic access to PDG data , Nuovo Cim

    PDG Collaboration, J. Beringer, Programmatic access to PDG data , Nuovo Cim. C 47 (2024), no. 4 206

    2024

  2. [8]

    Aaboud et al., Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 9 092006, [ arXiv:1802.03158]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [9]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for gauge-mediated supersymmetry in events with at least one photon and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 118–143, [ arXiv:1711.08008]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [10]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for supersymmetry in final states with photons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV , JHEP 06 (2019) 143, [ arXiv:1903.07070]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [11]

    CMS Collaboration, T. C. Collaboration et al., Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum , JHEP 10 (2019) 244, [ arXiv:1908.04722]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum using √s = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by ATLAS in Run 2 of the LHC , JHEP 10 (2020) 062, [ arXiv:2008.06032]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [13]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for direct pair production of sleptons and charginos decaying to two leptons and neutralinos with mass splittings near the W-boson mass in √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 06 (2023) 031, [arXiv:2209.13935]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [14]

    CMS Collaboration, Combined search for electroweak production of winos, binos, higgsinos, and sleptons in proton-proton collisions at sqrts = 13 TeV,

  9. [15]

    Gogoladze, J

    I. Gogoladze, J. D. Lykken, C. Macesanu, and S. Nandi, Implications of a Massless Neutralino for Neutrino Physics , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 073004, [ hep-ph/0211391]

    2003 arXiv

  10. [16]

    H. K. Dreiner, S. Heinemeyer, O. Kittel, U. Langenfeld, A. M. Weber, and G. Weiglein, Mass Bounds on a Very Light Neutralino , Eur. Phys. J. C 62 (2009) 547–572, [ arXiv:0901.3485]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [17]

    H. K. Dreiner, C. Hanhart, U. Langenfeld, and D. R. Phillips, Supernovae and light neutralinos: SN1987A bounds on supersymmetry revisited , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 055004, [hep-ph/0304289]

    2003 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Kachelriess, The KARMEN anomaly, light neutralinos and supernova SN1987A , JHEP 02 (2000) 010, [ hep-ph/0001160]

    M. Kachelriess, The KARMEN anomaly, light neutralinos and supernova SN1987A , JHEP 02 (2000) 010, [ hep-ph/0001160]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [19]

    H. K. Dreiner, J.-F. Fortin, J. Isern, and L. Ubaldi, White Dwarfs constrain Dark Forces , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 043517, [ arXiv:1303.7232]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Choudhury and S

    D. Choudhury and S. Sarkar, A Supersymmetric resolution of the KARMEN anomaly , Phys. Lett. B 374 (1996) 87–92, [ hep-ph/9511357]

    1996 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Choudhury, H

    D. Choudhury, H. K. Dreiner, P. Richardson, and S. Sarkar, A Supersymmetric solution to the KARMEN time anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 095009, [ hep-ph/9911365]. – 26 –

    2000 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Belanger, F

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and S. Rosier-Lees, A Lower limit on the neutralino mass in the MSSM with nonuniversal gaugino masses , in 10th International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY02) , pp. 919–924, 12,

  17. [23]

    Bottino, N

    A. Bottino, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Light relic neutralinos , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 063519, [hep-ph/0212379]

    2003 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Belanger, F

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Cottrant, A. Pukhov, and S. Rosier-Lees, Lower limit on the neutralino mass in the general MSSM , JHEP 03 (2004) 012, [ hep-ph/0310037]

    2004 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Albornoz Vasquez, G

    D. Albornoz Vasquez, G. Belanger, C. Boehm, A. Pukhov, and J. Silk, Can neutralinos in the MSSM and NMSSM scenarios still be light? , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115027, [arXiv:1009.4380]

    2010 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Calibbi, J

    L. Calibbi, J. M. Lindert, T. Ota, and Y. Takanishi, Cornering light Neutralino Dark Matter at the LHC , JHEP 10 (2013) 132, [ arXiv:1307.4119]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Hooper and T

    D. Hooper and T. Plehn, Supersymmetric dark matter: How light can the LSP be? , Phys. Lett. B 562 (2003) 18–27, [ hep-ph/0212226]

    2003 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Bottino, N

    A. Bottino, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Phenomenology of light neutralinos in view of recent results at the CERN Large Hadron Collider , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095013, [arXiv:1112.5666]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [29]

    B´ elanger, G

    G. B´ elanger, G. Drieu La Rochelle, B. Dumont, R. M. Godbole, S. Kraml, and S. Kulkarni, LHC constraints on light neutralino dark matter in the MSSM , Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 773–780, [arXiv:1308.3735]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Bechtle et al., Killing the cMSSM softly , Eur

    P. Bechtle et al., Killing the cMSSM softly , Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016), no. 2 96, [arXiv:1508.05951]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [31]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139 fb −1 of √s =13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2021) 143, [ arXiv:2010.14293]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [32]

    H. K. Dreiner, An Introduction to explicit R-parity violation , Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 565–583, [ hep-ph/9707435]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Barbier et al., R-parity violating supersymmetry , Phys

    R. Barbier et al., R-parity violating supersymmetry , Phys. Rept. 420 (2005) 1–202, [hep-ph/0406039]

    2005 arXiv

  28. [34]

    R. N. Mohapatra, Supersymmetry and R-parity: an Overview , Phys. Scripta 90 (2015) 088004, [arXiv:1503.06478]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [35]

    B. C. Allanach, A. Dedes, and H. K. Dreiner, R parity violating minimal supergravity model , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 115002, [ hep-ph/0309196]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 72, 079902 (2005)]

    2004 arXiv

  30. [36]

    H. K. Dreiner and G. G. Ross, R-parity violation at hadron colliders , Nucl. Phys. B 365 (1991) 597–613

    1991

  31. [37]

    de Campos, O

    F. de Campos, O. J. P. Eboli, M. B. Magro, W. Porod, D. Restrepo, M. Hirsch, and J. W. F. Valle, Probing bilinear R-parity violating supergravity at the LHC , JHEP 05 (2008) 048, [arXiv:0712.2156]

    2008 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Dercks, H

    D. Dercks, H. Dreiner, M. E. Krauss, T. Opferkuch, and A. Reinert, R-Parity Violation at the LHC , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017), no. 12 856, [ arXiv:1706.09418]. – 27 –

    2017 arXiv

  33. [39]

    H. K. Dreiner, Y. S. Koay, D. K¨ ohler, V. M. Lozano, J. Montejo Berlingen, S. Nangia, and N. Strobbe, The ABC of RPV: classification of R-parity violating signatures at the LHC for small couplings , JHEP 07 (2023) 215, [ arXiv:2306.07317]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [40]

    H. K. Dreiner, M. Hank, Y. S. Koay, M. Sch¨ urmann, R. Sengupta, A. Shah, N. Strobbe, and E. Thomson, The ABC of RPV II: Classification of R-parity Violating Signatures from UDD Couplings and their Coverage at the LHC , arXiv:2503.03830

  35. [41]

    Chamoun, F

    N. Chamoun, F. Domingo, and H. K. Dreiner, Nucleon decay in the R-parity violating MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 1 015020, [ arXiv:2012.11623]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [42]

    H. K. Dreiner, C. Luhn, and M. Thormeier, What is the discrete gauge symmetry of the MSSM?, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 075007, [ hep-ph/0512163]

    2006 arXiv

  37. [43]

    H. K. Dreiner, C. Luhn, H. Murayama, and M. Thormeier, Proton Hexality from an Anomalous Flavor U(1) and Neutrino Masses: Linking to the String Scale , Nucl. Phys. B 795 (2008) 172–200, [ arXiv:0708.0989]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [44]

    H. K. Dreiner and S. Grab, All Possible Lightest Supersymmetric Particles in R-Parity Violating mSUGRA , Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 45–50, [ arXiv:0811.0200]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Desch, S

    K. Desch, S. Fleischmann, P. Wienemann, H. K. Dreiner, and S. Grab, Stau as the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle in R-Parity Violating SUSY Models: Discovery Potential with Early LHC Data , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 015013, [ arXiv:1008.1580]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Abe et al., Belle II Technical Design Report , arXiv:1011.0352

    Belle-II Collaboration, T. Abe et al., Belle II Technical Design Report , arXiv:1011.0352

    arXiv

  41. [47]

    Altmannshofer et al., The Belle II Physics Book , PTEP 2019 (2019), no

    Belle-II Collaboration, W. Altmannshofer et al., The Belle II Physics Book , PTEP 2019 (2019), no. 12 123C01, [ arXiv:1808.10567]. [Erratum: PTEP 2020, 029201 (2020)]

    2019

  42. [49]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Search for B mesogenesis at BaBar , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 9 092001, [ arXiv:2302.00208]

    2023

  43. [50]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Search for Evidence of Baryogenesis and Dark Matter in B+ → ψD + p Decays at BABAR , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 20 201801, [arXiv:2306.08490]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    A. E. Nelson and H. Xiao, Baryogenesis from B Meson Oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 7 075002, [ arXiv:1901.08141]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Alonso- ´Alvarez, G

    G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, G. Elor, A. E. Nelson, and H. Xiao, A Supersymmetric Theory of Baryogenesis and Sterile Sneutrino Dark Matter from B Mesons, JHEP 03 (2020) 046, [arXiv:1907.10612]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [53]

    S. Dey, C. O. Dib, J. Carlos Helo, M. Nayak, N. A. Neill, A. Soffer, and Z. S. Wang, Long-lived light neutralinos at Belle II , JHEP 02 (2021) 211, [ arXiv:2012.00438]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. G¨ unther, The decay B → K + ν + ¯ν at Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry , Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025), no. 1 66, [arXiv:2309.03727]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Bertholet and A

    E. Bertholet and A. Soffer, Estimating the track-reconstruction efficiency in phenomenological proposals of long-lived-particle searches, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40 (2025), no. 15 2550032, [ arXiv:2501.00857]. – 28 –

    2025 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Faessler, T

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Semileptonic decays of double heavy baryons , Phys. Lett. B 518 (2001) 55–62, [ hep-ph/0107205]

    2001 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Gutsche, M

    T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. K¨ orner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and Z. Tyulemissov, Analysis of the semileptonic and nonleptonic two-body decays of the double heavy charm baryon states Ξ++ cc , Ξ+ cc and Ω+ cc, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 11 114037, [ arXiv:1911.10785]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Azizi, M

    K. Azizi, M. Bayar, and A. Ozpineci, Sigma(Q) Lambda(Q) pi Coupling Constant in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 056002, [ arXiv:0811.2695]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Azizi, Y

    K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Strong couplings of negative and positive parity nucleons to the heavy baryons and mesons , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 1 014022, [ arXiv:1506.00809]

    2015 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Domingo and H

    F. Domingo and H. K. Dreiner, Decays of a bino-like particle in the low-mass regime , SciPost Phys. 14 (2023), no. 5 134, [ arXiv:2205.08141]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Aitken, D

    K. Aitken, D. McKeen, T. Neder, and A. E. Nelson, Baryogenesis from Oscillations of Charmed or Beautiful Baryons , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 7 075009, [ arXiv:1708.01259]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [62]

    M. I. Buchoff and M. Wagman, Perturbative Renormalization of Neutron-Antineutron Operators, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 1 016005, [ arXiv:1506.00647]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 98, 079901 (2018)]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Calibbi, G

    L. Calibbi, G. Ferretti, D. Milstead, C. Petersson, and R. P¨ ottgen, Baryon number violation in supersymmetry: n − ¯n oscillations as a probe beyond the LHC , JHEP 05 (2016) 144, [arXiv:1602.04821]. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 195 (2017)]

    2016 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Litos et al., Search for Dinucleon Decay into Kaons in Super-Kamiokande, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, M. Litos et al., Search for Dinucleon Decay into Kaons in Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014), no. 13 131803

    2014

  58. [65]

    Gustafson et al., Search for dinucleon decay into pions at Super-Kamiokande , Phys

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, J. Gustafson et al., Search for dinucleon decay into pions at Super-Kamiokande , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 7 072009, [ arXiv:1504.01041]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Ohnishi et al., Accelerator design at SuperKEKB, PTEP 2013 (2013) 03A011

    Y. Ohnishi et al., Accelerator design at SuperKEKB, PTEP 2013 (2013) 03A011

    2013

  60. [67]

    SuperKEKB Collaboration, K. Akai, K. Furukawa, and H. Koiso, SuperKEKB Collider , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 907 (2018) 188–199, [ arXiv:1809.01958]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Adam et al., The DIRC particle identification system for the BaBar experiment , Nucl

    BaBar DIRC Collaboration, I. Adam et al., The DIRC particle identification system for the BaBar experiment , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 538 (2005) 281–357

    2005

  62. [69]

    Kurz, ”performance of Belle II tracking on collision data” , Proceedings of CTD 2020 (2020)

    S. Kurz, ”performance of Belle II tracking on collision data” , Proceedings of CTD 2020 (2020). BELLE2-CONF-PROC-2020-009

    2020

  63. [71]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Study of CP violation in Dalitz-plot analyses of B0 —> K+K-K0(S), B+ — > K+K-K+, and B+ — > K0(S)K0(S)K+, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 112010, [arXiv:1201.5897]

    2012 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Bertacchi et al., Track finding at Belle II , Comput

    Belle II T racking Group Collaboration, V. Bertacchi et al., Track finding at Belle II , Comput. Phys. Commun. 259 (2021) 107610, [ arXiv:2003.12466]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    D. J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462 (2001) 152–155, [ https://evtgen.hepforge.org/doc/EvtGenGuide.pdf]. – 29 –

    2001

  66. [74]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159–177, [ arXiv:1410.3012]

    2015 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Aad et al., Search for massive, long-lived particles using multitrack displaced vertices or displaced lepton pairs in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for massive, long-lived particles using multitrack displaced vertices or displaced lepton pairs in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 7 072004, [ arXiv:1504.05162]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Aad et al., Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons in Decays of W Bosons Using a Dilepton Displaced Vertex in s=13 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons in Decays of W Bosons Using a Dilepton Displaced Vertex in s=13 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 6 061803, [ arXiv:2204.11988]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    S. Zeng, F. Xu, and Y. Gu, The benchmark mode Ωc → Ω−π+ and its related processes, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025), no. 2 184, [ arXiv:2406.02097]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Bertholet and A

    E. Bertholet and A. Soffer, Trackeff: charged particle reconstruction efficiency estimator at Belle II and other experiments , Zenodo (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13831999. – 30 –

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.