Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Non-commutative resolutions and pre-quotients of Calabi-Yau double covers

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every branched double cover of a toric Fano variety, the A-periods of its non-commutative resolution obey the same GKZ hypergeometric system as those of an explicit smooth Calabi-Yau complete intersection, after a change of variables.

desk verdict A genuine advance over the earlier program, but the main GKZ equivalence is conditional on an asserted, unproven deformation-invariance step; still worth refereeing because the construction and examples are strong. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00633 v1 pith:SMSTQKYP submitted 2025-07-01 hep-th math.AG

Tsung-Ju Lee , Bong H. Lian , Mauricio Romo , Leonardo Santilli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath.AG MSC 14J3214J3314M25
keywords non-commutativeresolutionsCalabi-YaudoublecoversGKZhypergeometricsystemsgaugedlinearsigmamodelsA-periodstoriccompleteintersectionspre-quotientshomologicalmirrorsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the period geometry of non-commutative resolutions is governed by the same hypergeometric equations as ordinary Calabi-Yau geometry: for every branched double cover of a toric Fano variety, the A-periods of the non-commutative resolution are annihilated by the same GKZ system as the A-periods of an explicitly constructed smooth Calabi-Yau complete intersection, after a change of variables (Theorem 5.6). The matching variety is read off from the double cover's weight data by a purely combinatorial recipe, and no mirror variety is needed to state the result. This removes the 'gauge-fixing' restriction on the branching locus imposed in earlier work, so the theorem covers a much larger class of resolutions. Along the way the paper constructs a pre-quotient: a smooth Calabi-Yau complete intersection whose finite quotient by an abelian group recovers the original singular double cover, and conjectures that this pre-quotient is exactly the matched variety. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests that the quantum invariants of these singular Calabi-Yau double covers can be computed from smooth complete-intersection geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hemisphere partition function of the gauged linear $\sigma$ model realizing the non-commutative resolution: an integral over the Coulomb branch of a product of Gamma functions, with factors $\Gamma(2i\langle\theta^{(i)},\sigma\rangle)$ for each base coordinate and $\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2} - i\langle d^{(\alpha)},\sigma\rangle)$ for each section, multiplied by a brane factor. The Legendre duplication formula rewrites each half-integer-shifted Gamma factor so that the exponential shift is absorbed into a redefinition of the moduli, leaving a ratio of Gamma functions. Lemma 5.7 then shows that the two moves needed to convert that ratio into the integrand of a complete intersection, namely replacing $\Gamma(i\langle\ell,\sigma\rangle)$ by $1/\Gamma(1 - i\langle\ell,\sigma\rangle)$ and inserting $\pi/\sin(i\pi\langle\ell,\sigma\rangle)$, preserve the GKZ annihilator; the index sets $J$, $H$, $W$ track which weights pair up and cancel. Geometrically, the pre-quotient $X_{\mathrm{pre}}$ is constructed from the coordinate-squaring map on the ambient toric variety $P(\vec d,\vec\theta)$, the fiber product with the base, and the quotient by the kernel of the parity-sum map; the A-period is defined from the hemisphere partition function together with a chosen identification of variables, and the GKZ system is the hypergeometric system of box and Euler operators.

What would settle it

In a concrete one-modulus example, say $Y \to \mathbb{P}^3$ branched over a cubic and five hyperplanes, compute the A-periods of the auxiliary complete intersection $X_0$ at generic complex structure and at the degeneration $\{\varphi_0 = 0\}$, and compare the box operators of the two GKZ systems; if the annihilators differ, Lemma 5.7(2) fails and Theorem 5.6 collapses. A more direct check is to insert $\pi/\sin(i\pi\langle\ell,\sigma\rangle)$ into the A-period integrand and verify by explicit contour evaluation that every box operator still annihilates the result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 5.6: given a branched double cover Y of a toric Fano variety with a general nef partition of $-2K_B$, the A-periods of the non-commutative resolution $Y_{\mathrm{nc}}$ and the A-periods of an explicit smooth Calabi-Yau complete intersection $X$ are annihilated by the same GKZ system, after the change of variables (5.8). The variety $X$ is built from the weight data: coordinates carry weights $2\theta^{(i)}$ for the unpaired base weights and $d^{(\alpha)}$ for the surviving section weights, and $X$ is cut out by hypersurfaces of degrees $2d^{(\alpha)}$, with index sets $J$, $H$, $W$ recording which weights cancel. The authors also show that when the gauge-fixing condition holds, the singular double cover is the quotient $Y \cong X_{\mathrm{pre}}/\Gamma$ of a smooth Calabi-Yau complete intersection $X_{\mathrm{pre}}$ by a finite abelian group, and they conjecture $X_{\mathrm{pre}} = X$. They prove that true Clifford double mirror pairs are non-generic: a double cover of a weighted projective space admits one only in the all-ones case, and for every Calabi-Yau threefold double cover of $\mathbb{P}^3$ they compute the holomorphic A-periods and verify case by case their agreement with the topological data of the matched $X$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Lemma 5.7(2) assumes that the A-periods of a Calabi-Yau complete intersection are invariant under complex structure deformations, so that an added hypersurface can be degenerated to the divisor $\{\varphi_0 = 0\}$ without changing the GKZ system; this deformation-invariance is asserted in Appendix B.3.2 rather than proven, and the box-operator preservation in Theorem 5.6 depends on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theorem 5.6 covers arbitrary general nef partitions, so the A-periods of every non-commutative resolution considered in the paper satisfy an explicit GKZ system even when no mirror Calabi-Yau is available for comparison.
  • If Conjecture 4.1 holds, the A-periods of $Y_{\mathrm{nc}}$ and of the matched $X$ coincide exactly, not merely as solutions of one GKZ system; the detailed $\mathbb{P}^3$ tables, including all holomorphic A-periods and topological numbers, are the supporting evidence.
  • When gauge fixing is available, the singular double cover is a finite quotient $Y \cong X_{\mathrm{pre}}/\Gamma$ of a smooth complete intersection; Conjecture 4.6 asserts $X_{\mathrm{pre}} = X$, making the 'smooth cousin' a universal companion to the resolution.
  • Clifford double mirrors, for which the derived equivalence $D(Y_{\mathrm{nc}}) \cong D^b\mathrm{Coh}(X)$ exists, are rare: for double covers of weighted projective spaces, Proposition 4.9 shows this happens only when all weights and all degrees equal 1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the theorem's mechanism is as general as it looks, the same GLSM-plus-duplication recipe should produce matched smooth complete intersections for other hybrid-model geometries, such as determinantal Calabi-Yau threefolds, non-abelian GLSM phases, and higher-codimension Clifford-type resolutions, giving a uniform period-level handle on their quantum geometry.
  • The conjectured identity $X = X_{\mathrm{pre}}$, combined with the quotient presentation $Y \cong X_{\mathrm{pre}}/\Gamma$, suggests a computational route the authors only sketch in Remark 4.7: compute the genus-zero Gromov-Witten invariants of the smooth complete intersection and average over the finite group action to obtain the untwisted invariants of the singular double cover.
  • The deformation-invariance premise behind Lemma 5.7(2) is directly testable: in the one-modulus family, evaluate the A-periods of the auxiliary intersection $X_0$ at generic complex structure and at the degenerate locus $\{\varphi_0 = 0\}$ and check that the box operators agree.
  • If the period matching is genuine, the appropriate formulation of homological mirror symmetry for these singular double covers may be a period-preserving correspondence between K-theory classes, not a derived equivalence, which Remark 4.2 says is generically absent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies A-periods of non-commutative resolutions Y_nc of branched double covers Y→B of toric Fano varieties, extending an earlier proposal by the same authors to general nef partitions. After setting up a GLSM description of Y_nc, the paper derives an integral representation of the A-periods and, through Legendre duplication and cancellations, brings the integrand to a form containing Gamma functions and sine factors (Lemma 5.4). The central result, Theorem 5.6, asserts that for every such Y_nc there exists an explicit smooth Calabi-Yau complete intersection X such that the A-periods of Y_nc and of X are annihilated by the same GKZ system after the change of variables (5.8). The paper also constructs a 'pre-quotient' X_pre for gauge-fixed double covers, proves that Y is a finite quotient of X_pre (Proposition 4.5), and conjectures X_pre=X (Conjecture 4.6). Extensive examples for double covers of P^3 and products of projective spaces are worked out, with explicit holomorphic A-periods in Table 4 and matching topological data in Table 5.

Significance. If Theorem 5.6 were fully established, it would be a substantial extension of the known relationship between non-commutative resolutions and ordinary Calabi-Yau complete intersections: the A-periods of a large class of non-commutative resolutions would be governed by the period geometry of CICYs, going well beyond the gauge-fixed cases studied earlier. The explicit Gamma-function manipulations are detailed and the one-modulus examples provide convincing evidence; the tables of holomorphic A-periods and Chern-number checks are a useful resource. However, the main theorem depends on an unproven deformation-invariance assertion in Appendix B.3.2, so the central claim is currently conditional.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix B.3.2 (Lemma 5.7(2))] Point (2) of Lemma 5.7 is load-bearing for Theorem 5.6(2), but its proof in §B.3.2 invokes 'the invariance of the A-periods of X0 under deformations of the complex structure' without proving it. The passage then chooses the additional hypersurface to be {φ0=0} and asserts that fixing c0=c_{N+r+1}=1 recovers the original GKZ system; the box operators of the enlarged system are not computed, and their specialization to the box operators of X is not demonstrated. The GLSM definition (B.2) makes independence of the superpotential coefficients plausible, but the theorem requires a direct argument, for example a proof of deformation-invariance of (B.6) at the level of the hypergeometric system or an explicit computation of the enlarged box operators. Without this step, Theorem 5.6(2) is not established as written.
  2. [Theorem 5.6 (proof)] The proof of part (2) does not track the brane factor f_B(σ). The displayed expression for Z_X(B';t) after applying Lemma 5.7 introduces a new object B' without specifying its relation to the original B appearing in (5.3); if the theorem is meant to hold for every B∈D(Y_nc), the passage from f_B to f_{B'} (or the invariance of the GKZ statement under the finite shifts generated by (3.4)) must be justified. As written, the quantifier over B in Theorem 5.6 is unclear.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §1.1] The phrase that A-periods 'can also be realized as A-periods of a certain smooth CICY family' overstates Theorem 5.6, which proves only that both are annihilated by the same GKZ system after the substitution (5.8); moreover, the statement that a finite quotient of the CICY family recovers the double cover CY is proven in §4.2 only under the gauge-fixing hypotheses (2.9)–(2.11) and for X_pre, with X_pre=X left as Conjecture 4.6.
  2. [Lemma 5.4] The proof uses the same symbol J for a subset of {1,...,N} and for a subset of {1,...,r̂}; this makes the counting |H|=|W|-|J| hard to follow. Please use distinct notation, for example 𝔍 for one of the two sets.
  3. [Proposition 4.9] The converse direction is dismissed with 'one checks'; a few lines of argument would make the non-genericity of double mirrors transparent and would support the claim that the double-mirror phenomenon is exceptional.
  4. [After Theorem 5.6] The sentence 'if D_br is smooth, the variety X output by Theorem 5.6 is deformation-equivalent to Y' is stated without proof or reference; either prove it or explicitly mark it as a remark/conjecture.
  5. [Table 3] The 'gcd' column heading is unclear; from the text it appears to indicate whether all entries of the nef partition are even. Please clarify the caption and the meaning of the entries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GKZ equivalence is obtained by direct Gamma-function manipulation; self-citations are contextual, and the asserted complex-structure invariance in Lemma 5.7(2) is a load-bearing gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

Theorem 5.6 is not circular. The proof starts from the explicit GLSM A-period integral (5.1), rewrites it with the Legendre duplication formula (5.4) to obtain (5.3) (Lemma 5.4), and then uses Lemma 5.7 to replace reciprocal Gamma factors and erase sine factors. The resulting integrand is, by construction, the A-period of the explicit Calabi-Yau complete intersection X in Definition 5.5, and Theorem B.2 shows such integrals satisfy the stated GKZ system. This is a direct derivation: X and the variable map (5.8) are built from the weights of the rewritten Ync integrand, then the GKZ statement is verified; no target period is used as an input and no parameter is fitted. The self-citations [1], [2], [48] provide the GLSM/A-period framework, the original gauge-fixed mirror construction, and a derived equivalence with Clifford-module categories; none of these carries the proof of Theorem 5.6. Proposition 5.1 from [1] is recalled but explicitly said to be recovered later as a particular case, so it is not load-bearing. The one step needing scrutiny is Lemma 5.7(2) in §B.3.2: the proof asserts 'the invariance of the A-periods of X0 under deformations of the complex structure' and reduces the enlarged GKZ system by fixing c0 = c_{N+r+1} = 1. This is stated rather than demonstrated, and Theorem 5.6(2) depends on it. However, this is a missing justification, not circularity: the A-period definition (B.2) manifestly contains no superpotential coefficients, so the asserted invariance is an independent (and plausible) lemma whose failure would break the argument, not a restatement of the theorem. The extensive worked checks in Tables 4-5, where the resulting A-periods match standard complete-intersection period and topological data, confirm the derivation has independent content. Verdict: no significant circularity; score 2 reflects only minor non-load-bearing self-citations and the flagged unproven step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the physical GLSM framework for defining A-periods and on standard toric and GKZ mathematics. No numbers are fitted to data; the normalization of A-periods is chosen for convenience but does not affect the GKZ equivalence. The 'pre-quotient' Xpre is a constructed variety, not a postulated entity, and its existence as a quotient of Y is proven in Proposition 4.5.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Batyrev-Borisov toric duality and nef partitions of -K_B determine the geometry and period structure.
    Used throughout Section 2 to set up toric varieties, complete intersections, and GKZ systems; cited to [13,14,16].
  • standard math GKZ hypergeometric systems annihilate period integrals of toric complete intersections.
    Invoked in Section 2.4 and proven for A-periods in Appendix B.2, following [17,21,22].
  • domain assumption The GLSM hemisphere partition function with an admissible contour computes the A-period of an object in the derived category of B-branes.
    Central to the definition of A-periods in Section 3.3; the physical formalism is cited to [12,37,38,40] and not re-derived.
  • domain assumption Admissible contours exist and Gamma-function manipulations (Legendre duplication, cancellation, contour deformation) are valid for the integrals.
    Used in Lemma 5.4 and the one-modulus example in Section 5.2.1; convergence and pole structure are treated in the physics style rather than proven rigorously.
  • domain assumption A-periods are invariant under complex structure deformations, so a hypersurface can be degenerated without changing the GKZ system.
    Assumed in the proof of Lemma 5.7(2) in Appendix B.3.2; no proof is given for this deformation-invariance.
  • domain assumption The base B is a smooth MPCP toric Fano variety and the sections defining the branching divisor are generic.
    Stated in Section 2.1.4 and used in the construction of X and the smoothness note after Theorem 5.6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-commutative resolutions and pre-quotients of Calabi-Yau double covers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SMSTQKYP

@misc{pith2026250700633,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-commutative resolutions and pre-quotients of Calabi-Yau double covers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SMSTQKYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00633}
}
abstract

Following an earlier proposal arXiv:2307.02038 to apply the GLSM formalism to understand the so-called non-commutative resolution, this paper takes one important step further to extend this formalism to a much larger class of non-commutative resolutions. The proposal was initially motivated by the discovery of a new class of mirror pairs singular Calabi-Yau varieties arXiv:2003.07148, given by certain branched double covers over toric varieties of MPCP type. The overarching problem was to understand these mirror pairs from the viewpoint of homological mirror symmetry arXiv:alg-geom/9411018. In the present paper, we propose two main results along this line. First, one new insight is that the `gauge-fixing' condition on the branching locus of the double cover used in arXiv:2003.07148 can be relaxed in an interesting way. This turns out to produce GLSMs that describe a much larger class of non-commutative resolutions, leading to $A$-periods for a larger class of non-commutative resolutions, as well as the GKZ systems for their $A$-periods. Second, we show that the $A$-periods can also be realized as $A$-periods of a certain smooth CICY family in a toric variety of MPCP type, such that a suitable finite quotient of this family recovers the double cover CY we have started with. We call this CICY family the `pre-quotient' of the double cover CY. This realization strongly suggests that pre-quotient may provide an important approach for understanding homological mirror symmetry for singular double cover CY varieties and non-commutative resolutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00633 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Contour deformation in the one-modulus family. Left: We tilt γ in the upper-half plane and close it at ℑ(σ) → +∞. Right: We deform the integration cycle to encircle the non-trivial poles. In the chamber 0 < |ζ| ≪ 1 (equivalently ℜ(t) ≫ +1) it is possible to close the contour γ in the upper-half plane. For ℑ(σ) ≥ 0 the Gamma functions yield towers of poles at σ = i n (i) 2θ (i) , n(i) ∈ N . However, using Y N i=1 Γ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hankel contour H , in blue. The integrand in (B.13) has a branch cut along the positive real axis. of Z mod V (t) := Z γt d s σ ei⟨t,σ⟩ Q i∈M↑ Γ  i⟨ℓ (i) , σ⟩  Q i∈M↓ Γ  1 − i⟨ℓ (i) , σ⟩  Yr α=1 Γ  −i⟨d (α) , σ⟩  . B.3.1. Integral manipulations. We utilize the integral representation (B.9) for all Gamma functions in the numerator. For the Gamma functions in the denominator, we use the integral representation (… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T.-J. Lee, B. H. Lian and M. Romo, Non-commutative resolutions as mirrors of singular Calabi–Yau varieties , 2307.02038

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Mirror symmetry for double cover Calabi--Yau varieties

    S. Hosono, T.-J. Lee, B. H. Lian and S.-T. Yau, Mirror symmetry for double cover Calabi–Yau varieties, J. Diff. Geom. 127 (2024) 409 [ 2003.07148]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Kontsevich, Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry , in Proc

    M. Kontsevich, Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry , in Proc. ICM, 11, 1994, alg-geom/9411018

    arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    Lerche, C

    W. Lerche, C. Vafa and N. P. Warner, Chiral Rings in N=2 Superconformal Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 427

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Cecotti and C

    S. Cecotti and C. Vafa, Topological antitopological fusion, Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 359

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Cohomology ring of crepant resolutions of orbifolds

    Y. Ruan, Cohomology ring of crepant resolutions of orbifolds , math/0108195

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [7]

    Caldararu, J

    A. Caldararu, J. Distler, S. Hellerman, T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, Non-birational twisted derived equivalences in abelian GLSMs , Commun. Math. Phys. 294 (2010) 605 [0709.3855]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    M. V. den Bergh, Non-commutative crepant resolutions, in The Legacy of Niels Henrik Abel, p. 749–770. Springer, Berlin, 2004. math/0211064

    arXiv 2004

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Kuznetsov, Lefschetz decompositions and categorical resolutions of singularities , Selecta Math

    A. Kuznetsov, Lefschetz decompositions and categorical resolutions of singularities , Selecta Math. 13 (2008) 661–696 [ math/0609240]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hosono, B

    S. Hosono, B. H. Lian, H. Takagi and S.-T. Yau, K3 surfaces from configurations of six lines in P2 and mirror symmetry I , Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 14 (2020) 739 [1810.00606]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Hosono, B

    S. Hosono, B. H. Lian and S.-T. Yau, K3 surfaces from configurations of six lines in P2 and mirror symmetry II— λK3-functions, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2021 (2021) 13231 [1903.09373]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hori and M

    K. Hori and M. Romo, Exact Results In Two-Dimensional (2,2) Supersymmetric Gauge Theories With Boundary , 1308.2438

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Borisov, Towards the mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau complete intersections in Gorenstein toric Fano varieties , alg-geom/9310001

    L. Borisov, Towards the mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau complete intersections in Gorenstein toric Fano varieties , alg-geom/9310001

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    D. A. Cox, J. B. Little and H. K. Schenck, Toric varieties, vol. 124 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011, 10.1090/gsm/124

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    T.-J. Lee, B. H. Lian and S.-T. Yau, On Calabi–Yau fractional complete intersections, Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 18 (2022) 317 [ 2008.04039]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    V. V. Batyrev and L. A. Borisov, On Calabi–Yau complete intersections in toric varieties, alg-geom/9412017

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Hosono, B

    S. Hosono, B. H. Lian and S.-T. Yau, GKZ generalized hypergeometric systems in mirror symmetry of Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces , Commun. Math. Phys. 182 (1996) 535 [alg-geom/9511001]

    1996 arXiv

  10. [18]

    D. A. Cox, The Homogeneous coordinate ring of a toric variety , J. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995) 17 [ alg-geom/9210008]. NC RESOLUTIONS AND PRE-QUOTIENTS OF CY DOUBLE COVERS 50

    1995 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kuznetsov, Derived categories of quadric fibrations and intersections of quadrics , Adv

    A. Kuznetsov, Derived categories of quadric fibrations and intersections of quadrics , Adv. Math. 218 (2008) 1340 [ math/0510670]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    L. A. Borisov and Z. Li, On Clifford double mirrors of toric complete intersections , Adv. Math. 328 (2018) 300 [ 1601.00809]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    I. M. Gelfand, M. M. Kapranov and A. V. Zelevinsky, Generalized Euler integrals and A-hypergeometric functions, Adv. Math. 84 (1990) 255

    1990

  14. [22]

    I. M. Gelfand, M. M. Kapranov and A. V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, Resultants, and Multidimensional Determinants , Modern Birkhauser Classics. Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1994, 10.1007/978-0-8176-4771-1

    1994 doi

  15. [23]

    Batyrev, Variations of the mixed Hodge structure of affine hypersurfaces in algebraic tori, Duke Math

    V. Batyrev, Variations of the mixed Hodge structure of affine hypersurfaces in algebraic tori, Duke Math. J. 69 (1993) 349

    1993

  16. [24]

    Lee, A note on periods of Calabi–Yau fractional complete intersections , Mathematische Zeitschrift 304 (2023) 60 [ 2204.10474]

    T.-J. Lee, A note on periods of Calabi–Yau fractional complete intersections , Mathematische Zeitschrift 304 (2023) 60 [ 2204.10474]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Witten, Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions , Nucl

    E. Witten, Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 403 (1993) 159 [hep-th/9301042]

    1993 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bertolini, I

    M. Bertolini, I. V. Melnikov and M. R. Plesser, Hybrid conformal field theories , JHEP 05 (2014) 043 [ 1307.7063]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Sharpe, Predictions for Gromov–Witten invariants of noncommutative resolutions, J

    E. Sharpe, Predictions for Gromov–Witten invariants of noncommutative resolutions, J. Geom. Phys. 74 (2013) 256 [ 1212.5322]

    2013 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Sharpe, A few Ricci-flat stacks as phases of exotic GLSM’s , Phys

    E. Sharpe, A few Ricci-flat stacks as phases of exotic GLSM’s , Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 390 [ 1306.5440]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Erkinger and J

    D. Erkinger and J. Knapp, Sphere Partition Function of Calabi–Yau GLSMs , Commun. Math. Phys. 394 (2022) 257 [ 2008.03089]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Erkinger and J

    D. Erkinger and J. Knapp, On genus-0 invariants of Calabi–Yau hybrid models , JHEP 05 (2023) 071 [ 2210.01226]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    S. Katz, A. Klemm, T. Schimannek and E. Sharpe, Topological Strings on Non-commutative Resolutions, Commun. Math. Phys. 405 (2024) 62 [ 2212.08655]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Katz and T

    S. Katz and T. Schimannek, New non-commutative resolutions of determinantal Calabi–Yau threefolds from hybrid GLSM , 2307.00047

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Knapp and R

    J. Knapp and R. Pryor, B-type D-branes in hybrid models , SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 165 [2404.14613]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Knapp and J

    J. Knapp and J. McGovern, Noncommutative resolutions and CICY quotients from a non-abelian GLSM , 2504.06147

  27. [35]

    Honda and T

    D. Honda and T. Okuda, Exact results for boundaries and domain walls in 2d supersymmetric theories, JHEP 09 (2015) 140 [ 1308.2217]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Witten, Topological Sigma Models, Commun

    E. Witten, Topological Sigma Models, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 411

    1988

  29. [37]

    Herbst, K

    M. Herbst, K. Hori and D. Page, Phases Of N=2 Theories In 1+1 Dimensions With Boundary, 0803.2045

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Ballard, D

    M. Ballard, D. Favero and L. Katzarkov, Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients and derived categories , J. Reine Angew. Math. 2019 (2019) 235 [1203.6643]. NC RESOLUTIONS AND PRE-QUOTIENTS OF CY DOUBLE COVERS 51

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    P. S. Aspinwall, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison, Calabi-Yau moduli space, mirror manifolds and space-time topology change in string theory , Nucl. Phys. B 416 (1994) 414 [ hep-th/9309097]

    1994 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Halpern-Leistner, The derived category of a GIT quotient , J

    D. Halpern-Leistner, The derived category of a GIT quotient , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015) 871 [ 1203.0276]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Pantev and E

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks) , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (2006) 77 [ hep-th/0502053]

    2006 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A. Adem, J. Leida and Y. Ruan, Orbifolds and stringy topology , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511543081

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    Buchweitz, Maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology , vol

    R.-O. Buchweitz, Maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology , vol. 262 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, [2021] ©2021, 10.1090/surv/262

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Tu, Matrix factorizations via Koszul duality , Compos

    J. Tu, Matrix factorizations via Koszul duality , Compos. Math. 150 (2014) 1549 [1009.4151]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ballard, D

    M. Ballard, D. Deliu, D. Favero, M. U. Isik and L. Katzarkov, Resolutions in factorization categories, Adv. Math. 295 (2016) 195 [ 1212.3264]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D. O. Orlov, Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models, Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 246 (2004) 240 [ math/0302304]

    2004 arXiv

  39. [47]

    A. I. Efimov and L. Positselski, Coherent analogues of matrix factorizations and relative singularity categories, Algebra Number Theory 9 (2015) 1159 [ 1102.0261]

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Guo and M

    J. Guo and M. Romo, Hybrid models for homological projective duals and noncommutative resolutions, Lett. Math. Phys. 112 (2022) 117 [ 2111.00025]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    N. M. Addington, E. P. Segal and E. Sharpe, D-brane probes, branched double covers, and noncommutative resolutions , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18 (2014) 1369 [1211.2446]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hori and M

    K. Hori and M. Romo, Notes on the hemisphere , in Primitive forms and related subjects—Kavli IPMU 2014 , vol. 83 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pp. 127–220. Math. Soc. Japan, [Tokyo], 2019

    2014

  43. [51]

    Eager, K

    R. Eager, K. Hori, J. Knapp and M. Romo, to appear,

  44. [52]

    Neeman, The K-Theory of Triangulated Categories , in Handbook of K-Theory (E

    A. Neeman, The K-Theory of Triangulated Categories , in Handbook of K-Theory (E. Friedlander and D. Grayson, eds.), p. 1011–1078. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  45. [53]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. Corti, H. Iritani and H.-H. Tseng, A mirror theorem for toric stacks , Compos. Math. 151 (2015) 1878–1912 [ 1310.4163]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Tseng, Orbifold quantum Riemann–Roch, Lefschetz and Serre , Geom

    H.-H. Tseng, Orbifold quantum Riemann–Roch, Lefschetz and Serre , Geom. Topol. 14 (2010) 1 [ math/0506111]

    2010 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Hosono, A

    S. Hosono, A. Klemm, S. Theisen and S.-T. Yau, Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces , Commun. Math. Phys. 167 (1995) 301 [hep-th/9308122]

    1995 arXiv

  48. [56]

    J. R. Calabrese and R. P. Thomas, Derived equivalent Calabi—Yau threefolds from cubic fourfolds , Mathematische Annalen 365 (2015) 155–172 [ 1408.4063]. NC RESOLUTIONS AND PRE-QUOTIENTS OF CY DOUBLE COVERS 52

    2015 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Lin and M

    B. Lin and M. Romo, B-brane Transport and Grade Restriction Rule for Determinantal Varieties, Commun. Math. Phys. 405 (2024) 268 [ 2402.07109]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Schimannek, In search of almost generic Calabi–Yau 3-folds , 2504.06115

    T. Schimannek, In search of almost generic Calabi–Yau 3-folds , 2504.06115

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    W. Gu, J. Guo and Y. Wen, Nonabelian mirrors and Gromov-Witten invariants , 2012.04664

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties , Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995) 279 [hep-th/9412236]

    1995 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Hori and C

    K. Hori and C. Vafa, Mirror symmetry, hep-th/0002222

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.