Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 32 references

UAVD-Mamba: Deformable Token Fusion Vision Mamba for Multimodal UAV Detection

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read UAVD-Mamba, a Mamba-based RGB-infrared detector with deformable tokens, reports 83.0% mAP on DroneVehicle, 3.6 points above the OAFA baseline.

desk verdict A genuinely new deformable-token Mamba block that appears to help, but the headline 3.6% edge over OAFA is not verified because the evaluation protocol comparison is unconfirmed. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00849 v1 pith:WGRGUKGK submitted 2025-07-01 cs.CV

Wei Li , Jiaman Tang , Yang Li , Beihao Xia , Ligang Tan , Hongmao Qin This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords multimodalUAVdetectionMambadeformabletokenRGB-infraredfusionorientedobjectDroneVehicledatasetfeaturestatespacemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that Mamba-style state-space models can handle the irregular, occluded, small targets typical of UAV imagery if the tokens fed into the sequence model are allowed to deform rather than staying on a fixed square grid. It builds UAVD-Mamba, a dual-stream RGB and infrared detector, where each modality gets its own Deformable Token Mamba Block, the two streams meet in a Fusion Mamba Block, and multiscale features are processed by a YOLOv11-inspired neck adapted for Mamba. On the DroneVehicle dataset the method reports 83.0% mAP, 3.6 points higher than the OAFA baseline, and the ablation attributes the largest single gain to the deformable token block. If the result holds, it suggests that Mamba's efficient long-range modeling can be made geometrically adaptive enough for practical aerial detection.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Deformable Token Mamba Block (DTMB), which generates deformable tokens by adding the outputs of a standard convolution and a deformable convolution, $T_m = \operatorname{Conv}(F^{cs}_m) + \operatorname{DConv}(F^{cs}_m)$, and feeds these tokens into a Vision Mamba Block. This gives the state-space model patches that can adapt their geometry to irregular objects rather than fixed square cells. Around this, the Fusion Mamba Block extends the state-space model to a two-input fusion form so that RGB and IR features supplement each other, and the cross-channel attention $F_f = F^{FM}_{rgb} \times F^c_{rgb}/F^c_{ir} + F^{FM}_{ir} \times F^c_{ir}/F^c_{rgb}$ is the mechanism that removes cross-modal redundancy. A multiscale variant stacks four DTMBs, feeding three of their outputs into the Detection Neck for Mamba, which replaces YOLOv11's C3K2 module with Mamba blocks and applies SPPF followed by Mamba at each scale.

What would settle it

Run UAVD-Mamba and OAFA on the same DroneVehicle test split with the same ground-truth merging rule and the same mAP@0.5 orientation-aware evaluation script. If UAVD-Mamba's mAP does not come out 3.6 points above OAFA's re-measured mAP, the headline comparison fails; a second check is to retrain the base-plus-DTMB configuration without the deformable-convolution branch and see whether mAP drops by roughly the 2.1 points reported in the ablation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a Mamba-based multimodal detector constructed around deformable tokens reaches 83.0% mAP on DroneVehicle, outperforming the OAFA baseline at 79.4% by 3.6 points, while also improving on per-class accuracy for cars, trucks, buses, and vans. The claim is carried by the Deformable Token Mamba Block, which forms each input token by adding a normal patch from a standard convolution to an adaptive patch from a deformable convolution, so that the token shape follows image content instead of a fixed division. Two separate DTMBs process the RGB and infrared streams, a Fusion Mamba Block exchanges state between the modalities through a two-input state-space model, and a cross-channel attention formula divides each modality's feature by the other modality's channel attention to suppress redundancy. The paper further reports that adding DTMB to a YOLOv11 base raises mAP from 79.6% to 81.7%, that the full pipeline reaches 83.0%, and that a faster variant with only DTMB still reaches 81.7% mAP at higher frame rates.

Load-bearing premise

The 3.6% improvement over OAFA is valid only if both methods were measured on the same test images with the same scoring rule; the paper follows a protocol used by earlier studies but does not confirm that OAFA used exactly that protocol.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the DroneVehicle dataset, UAVD-Mamba reaches 83.0% mAP, 3.6 points above the OAFA baseline, with the highest per-class scores among compared detectors on car, truck, bus, and van.
  • The deformable token construction is the main source of gain: adding DTMB to a YOLOv11 base raises mAP from 79.6% to 81.7%, a larger jump than the later additions of FFAR and DNM.
  • Each proposed module contributes: FFAR adds another 0.7 points on top of DTMB, and DNM adds 0.6 points on top of DTMB plus FFAR, bringing the final total to 83.0%.
  • A faster configuration, UAVD-Mamba-FAST using only DTMB, retains 81.7% mAP while running at 45.0 FPS on an A6000 and 24.2 FPS on an RTX 4090, indicating a practical speed-accuracy tradeoff.
  • The full model uses 39.7 million parameters and 38.9 GFLOPs, which is lighter than several compared multimodal baselines while achieving higher mAP.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct head-to-head that re-runs OAFA with the same DroneVehicle split, ground-truth merging rule, and mAP@0.5 evaluation script would confirm whether the 3.6-point gap survives protocol matching; the paper follows a prior protocol but does not verify that OAFA used it.
  • The deformable-token construction could be ported to other Mamba-based vision backbones and to tasks with irregular objects, such as medical image segmentation or remote-sensing instance detection, where fixed patch grids are known to lose information.
  • The cross-channel attention formula, which divides by the other modality's channel attention, is a general anti-redundancy operation that could be tested on other two-stream fusion problems, especially with noisy or misaligned modality pairs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces UAVD-Mamba, a dual-stream RGB-infrared object detector for UAV imagery. The method combines deformable-token Vision Mamba blocks (DTMB), a Fusion Mamba Block for cross-modal state-space fusion, cross-enhanced spatial and cross-channel attention, a four-scale stack of DTMBs, and a YOLOv11-inspired detection neck (DNM). On the DroneVehicle dataset the paper reports 83.0% mAP@0.5, which is 3.6 points above the OAFA baseline, and an ablation study attributes the gains to DTMB, FFAR, and DNM. Source code is promised but not yet provided.

Significance. If the headline comparison is protocol-fair, the paper is a useful applied contribution: the deformable-token mechanism is a plausible remedy for Mamba's fixed tokenization, the architecture is clearly motivated, the efficiency numbers are informative, and the paper includes a candid limitation discussion. The evaluation is against an external benchmark, and I found no circularity in the core empirical claim. However, the central SOTA claim rests entirely on the comparison to OAFA, whose evaluation protocol is not verified to match the one used here, and the ablation gains are small and reported without variance information. The paper therefore needs a strengthening of the experimental evidence before its claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV-A; Table I; Fig. 4] The 3.6% mAP improvement over OAFA is not verified as a fair comparison. Section IV-A defines the evaluation protocol (ground truth taken from the modality with more annotations, mAP@0.5 with oriented bounding boxes) and cites [24] and [31] as precedents; OAFA [25] is not among those citations. The Fig. 4 caption states that OAFA is not open-source, so the 79.4% OAFA number is imported without re-implementation. If OAFA uses a different annotation-merging rule, evaluation split, or metric convention, the entire headline advantage could be an artifact; this concern is amplified by the fact that the paper's own YOLOv11 base reaches 79.6% in the ablation (Table IV), already above OAFA's 79.4%. Please confirm OAFA's exact protocol, re-run it under the same protocol, or obtain and evaluate its predictions with the same evaluation code, and report the corrected comparison.
  2. [Section III-B; Table IV] The ablation does not cleanly isolate the DTMB contribution because FFAR is defined in Section III-B as containing the Cross-enhanced Spatial Attention, DTMB, Fusion Mamba Block, and Cross-Channel Attention. Thus the 'Base+D+F' configuration adds a second DTMB (the one inside FFAR) on top of the standalone DTMB, so the +2.7% gain cannot be attributed to FFAR alone, and the conclusion that DTMB contributes most is not supported by the reported decomposition. Please clarify whether the standalone DTMB in the ablation is the same component as the DTMB inside FFAR, or provide a configuration that removes one of the two DTMBs, and describe the exact module stack for each row. In addition, the ablation base row reports 79.6% while Table I lists YOLOv11 (Base) with RGB+IR at 79.3%, so the base configuration needs to be stated precisely.
  3. [Section IV-A, Section IV-E, Eq. (11)] The empirical claims lack statistical support and full reproducibility. The paper reports a single run with no error bars or significance tests; the ablation margins are 0.6-0.7 mAP, which may be within run-to-run noise, especially for a 100-epoch training schedule. The loss weights lambda_cls, lambda_box, and lambda_dfl in Eq. (11) are never specified, and the stride, kernel size, and token-sequence construction inside the DTMB are not fully described. Please report mean and standard deviation over multiple seeds (or a significance test), provide the exact loss weights, and give the missing DTMB configuration details.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III-B, Eq. (7)] Eq. (7) says 'AvgPool(\cdot) denote maximum pooling', which is contradictory; please use either average pooling or maximum pooling consistently in the formula and the text.
  2. [Section IV-C, Table II] The sentence claiming 'fewer parameters and GFlops' is inaccurate relative to SLBAF, which has 6.3M parameters compared to the proposed 39.7M; please qualify the claim to the compared methods that the paper actually outperforms in both accuracy and efficiency.
  3. [Section III-D, Eq. (11)] There is a typo in Eq. (11): 'lambda_clc' should be 'lambda_cls' for the classification loss coefficient.
  4. [Section II-B] The citation mapping does not match the bibliography: the text attributes a Cross-modal Fusion Mamba (CFM) module to [11], but [11] in the reference list is 'Coupled Mamba', while [12] is listed as 'Remotedet-Mamba' even though the text says [12] applied Coupled Mamba; please correct the citation labels.
  5. [Table I] The formatting of Table I is difficult to follow for the single-modality rows: DAIK and I2MDet appear under the RGB input column but their Input field says IR; please align the table so each method's input modality is unambiguous.
  6. [Section III-B and Section IV-D] The description of how normal patches and adaptive patches are merged into one token sequence is informal; Eq. (3) states that the two convolution outputs are added, but the kernel sizes, strides, and how the resulting tensor is flattened into Mamba tokens should be specified for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the mAP claim is measured against an external benchmark and baselines; the only self-citation is motivational and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its empirical claims. DTMB, FFAR, FMB, and DNM are defined by Eqs. (1)-(11) using standard primitives (convolutions, deformable convolutions [28], Mamba [2], FusionMamba [29]), and no equation fits a parameter to the reported mAP or to OAFA's 79.4. The 83.0% mAP is computed on the DroneVehicle test split with the protocol stated in Section IV-A (labels from the modality with more annotations, mAP@0.5, OBB), and Table I compares against externally published detectors, including OAFA [25]. The ablation in Table IV is ordinary additive attribution of empirically measured gains, not a prediction forced by construction. The only self-citation, reference [11] by W. Li et al., appears in the related-work motivation (Section II-B) and is not load-bearing: no module, equation, or numerical result depends on it. Section IV-F and the Fig. 4 caption candidly disclose the freight-car weakness and that OAFA is not open-source, which are comparability limitations rather than circular steps. Hence no claim reduces to its own input and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an empirical performance number, not a derived law; the free parameters are training and architecture hyperparameters, all fitted on DroneVehicle. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Loss coefficients λ_cls, λ_box, λ_dfl = not reported
    Weights in Eq. 11 are not specified; the paper does not state if they are taken from YOLOv11 or tuned.
  • Number of stacked DTMB iterations = 4
    Section III-C chooses four iterations to produce multiscale features; no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • Input resolution = 640x640
    Section IV-A resizes images from 840x712 to 640x640; this is a design choice that affects accuracy and speed.
  • Mosaic augmentation = 4 images combined
    Section IV-A describes the data augmentation; settings are not optimized.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The referenced Vision Mamba Block [10], Fusion Mamba Block [29], and deformable convolution [28] are used as described in those papers.
    The method is built on these modules without independent verification or reimplementation detail.
  • domain assumption Ground truth is taken from the modality with more annotations and the mAP@0.5 protocol matches the cited baselines.
    Section IV-A; this is necessary for the OAFA comparison to be fair.
  • domain assumption The YOLOv11 detection head and loss components are used as released, with only the neck modified.
    Section III-D; changes to the loss or head would affect the results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UAVD-Mamba: Deformable Token Fusion Vision Mamba for Multimodal UAV Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WGRGUKGK

@misc{pith2026250700849,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UAVD-Mamba: Deformable Token Fusion Vision Mamba for Multimodal UAV Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WGRGUKGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00849}
}
read the original abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) object detection has been widely used in traffic management, agriculture, emergency rescue, etc. However, it faces significant challenges, including occlusions, small object sizes, and irregular shapes. These challenges highlight the necessity for a robust and efficient multimodal UAV object detection method. Mamba has demonstrated considerable potential in multimodal image fusion. Leveraging this, we propose UAVD-Mamba, a multimodal UAV object detection framework based on Mamba architectures. To improve geometric adaptability, we propose the Deformable Token Mamba Block (DTMB) to generate deformable tokens by incorporating adaptive patches from deformable convolutions alongside normal patches from normal convolutions, which serve as the inputs to the Mamba Block. To optimize the multimodal feature complementarity, we design two separate DTMBs for the RGB and infrared (IR) modalities, with the outputs from both DTMBs integrated into the Mamba Block for feature extraction and into the Fusion Mamba Block for feature fusion. Additionally, to improve multiscale object detection, especially for small objects, we stack four DTMBs at different scales to produce multiscale feature representations, which are then sent to the Detection Neck for Mamba (DNM). The DNM module, inspired by the YOLO series, includes modifications to the SPPF and C3K2 of YOLOv11 to better handle the multiscale features. In particular, we employ cross-enhanced spatial attention before the DTMB and cross-channel attention after the Fusion Mamba Block to extract more discriminative features. Experimental results on the DroneVehicle dataset show that our method outperforms the baseline OAFA method by 3.6% in the mAP metric. Codes will be released at https://github.com/GreatPlum-hnu/UAVD-Mamba.git.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00849 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Previous Vision Mamba [2] split the input image into the normal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An Overview of UAVD-Mamba. The RGB-IR image pairs are first resized and then sent to the FFAR for multimodal feature fusion. FFAR consists of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. We propose the Detection Neck for Mamba (right side), incorporating specific modifications to the SPPF and C3K2 of the neck of YOLOv11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Detection results on DroneVehicle dataset. The confidence threshold is set to 0.6. The base model is YOLOv11. We visualize Ground truth in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of the normal patches (blue) and the adaptive patches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ablation experiment detection results on DroneVehicle dataset. The confidence threshold is set to 0.6. The results of our complete method are in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of freight cars and trucks in RGB and IR images. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Multi-modal object detection of uav remote sensing based on joint representation optimization and specific information enhance- ment,

    J. Wang, C. Xu, C. Zhao, L. Gao, J. Wu, Y . Yan, S. Feng, and N. Su, “Multi-modal object detection of uav remote sensing based on joint representation optimization and specific information enhance- ment,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. , vol. 17, p. 12364–12373, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [31]

    Directional alignment instance knowledge distillation for arbitrary-oriented object detection,

    A. Wang, H. Wang, Z. Huang, B. Zhao, and W. Li, “Directional alignment instance knowledge distillation for arbitrary-oriented object detection,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 61, p. 1–14, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [25]

    Weakly misalignment-free adaptive feature alignment for uavs-based multimodal object detection,

    C. Chen, J. Qi, X. Liu, K. Bin, R. Fu, X. Hu, and P. Zhong, “Weakly misalignment-free adaptive feature alignment for uavs-based multimodal object detection,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) , 2024, pp. 26 836–26 845

    work page 2024

  4. [1]

    Improving rgb- infrared object detection with cascade alignment-guided transformer,

    M. Yuan, X. Shi, N. Wang, Y . Wang, and X. Wei, “Improving rgb- infrared object detection with cascade alignment-guided transformer,” Inf. Fusion , vol. 105, p. 102246, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [2]

    Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,

    A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,” 2023, arXiv:2312.00752

    arXiv 2023

  6. [3]

    Scale-aware fast r-cnn for pedestrian detection,

    J. Li, X. Liang, S. Shen, T. Xu, J. Feng, and S. Yan, “Scale-aware fast r-cnn for pedestrian detection,” IEEE Trans. Multimedia , vol. 20, pp. 985–996, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [4]

    Multi-angle parking detection system using mask r-cnn,

    T. Agrawal and S. Urolagin, “Multi-angle parking detection system using mask r-cnn,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Big Data Eng. Technol. , 2020, pp. 76–80

    work page 2020

  8. [5]

    Deconv r-cnn for small object detection on remote sensing images,

    W. Zhang, S. Wang, S. Thachan, J. Chen, and Y . Qian, “Deconv r-cnn for small object detection on remote sensing images,” in IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS) , 2018, pp. 2483–2486

    work page 2018

Show all 32 references
  1. [6]

    Object detection and count of objects in image using tensor flow object detection api,

    B. K. Sai and T. Sasikala, “Object detection and count of objects in image using tensor flow object detection api,” in Int. Conf. Smart Syst. Invent. Technol. (ICSSIT) , 2019, pp. 542–546

    2019

  2. [7]

    Cnn-based segmen- tation of medical imaging data,

    B. Kayalibay, G. Jensen, and P. van der Smagt, “Cnn-based segmen- tation of medical imaging data,” 2017, arXiv:1701.03056

    2017 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Fusformer: A transformer-based fusion network for hyperspectral image super-resolution,

    J.-F. Hu, T.-Z. Huang, L.-J. Deng, H.-X. Dou, D. Hong, and G. Vivone, “Fusformer: A transformer-based fusion network for hyperspectral image super-resolution,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. , vol. 19, pp. 1–5, 2022

    2022

  4. [9]

    U2net: A general framework with spatial-spectral-integrated double u-net for image fusion,

    S. Peng, C. Guo, X. Wu, and L.-J. Deng, “U2net: A general framework with spatial-spectral-integrated double u-net for image fusion,” in Proc. 31st ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia. (ACM Multimedia) , 2023, pp. 3219–3227

    2023

  5. [10]

    Vision mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model,

    L. Zhu, B. Liao, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Liu, and X. Wang, “Vision mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model,” 2024, arXiv:2401.09417

    2024 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Coupled mamba: Enhanced multi-modal fusion with coupled state space model,

    W. Li, H. Zhou, J. Yu, Z. Song, and W. Yang, “Coupled mamba: Enhanced multi-modal fusion with coupled state space model,” 2024, arXiv:2405.18014

    2024 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Remotedet-mamba: A hybrid mamba-cnn network for multi-modal object detection in remote sens- ing images,

    K. Ren, X. Wu, L. Xu, and L. Wang, “Remotedet-mamba: A hybrid mamba-cnn network for multi-modal object detection in remote sens- ing images,” 2024, arXiv:2410.13532

    2024

  8. [13]

    A novel state space model with local enhancement and state sharing for image fusion,

    Z. Cao, X. Wu, L.-J. Deng, and Y . Zhong, “A novel state space model with local enhancement and state sharing for image fusion,” in Proc. 32nd ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia. (ACM Multimedia) , 2024, pp. 1235– 1244

    2024

  9. [14]

    Mim-istd: Mamba-in-mamba for efficient infrared small target detection

    T. Chen, Z. Tan, T. Gong, Q. Chu, Y . Wu, B. Liu, J. Ye, and N. Yu, “Mim-istd: Mamba-in-mamba for efficient infrared small target detection.” 2024, arXiv:2403.02148

    2024 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Mask-guided mamba fusion for drone-based visible-infrared vehicle detection,

    S. Wang, C. Wang, C. Shi, Y . Liu, and M. Lu, “Mask-guided mamba fusion for drone-based visible-infrared vehicle detection,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 62, p. 1–12, 2024

    2024

  11. [16]

    Famba-v: Fast vision mamba with cross-layer token fusion,

    H. Shen, Z. Wan, X. Wang, and M. Zhang, “Famba-v: Fast vision mamba with cross-layer token fusion,” 2024, arXiv:2409.09808

    2024 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Mamba-in-mamba: Centralized mamba-cross-scan in tokenized mamba model for hyperspectral image classification,

    W. Zhou, S.-i. Kamata, H. Wang, M. S. Wong, and H. C. Hou, “Mamba-in-mamba: Centralized mamba-cross-scan in tokenized mamba model for hyperspectral image classification,” Neurocomput- ing, vol. 613, p. 128751, 2025

    2025

  13. [18]

    Improving yolov7-tiny for infrared and visible light image object detection on drones,

    S. Hu, F. Zhao, H. Lu, Y . Deng, J. Du, and X. Shen, “Improving yolov7-tiny for infrared and visible light image object detection on drones,” Remote Sens. , vol. 15, p. 3214, 2023

    2023

  14. [19]

    Oriented infrared vehicle detection in aerial images via mining frequency and semantic information,

    N. Zhang, Y . Liu, H. Liu, T. Tian, and J. Tian, “Oriented infrared vehicle detection in aerial images via mining frequency and semantic information,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 61, pp. 1–15, 2023

    2023

  15. [20]

    Drone-based visible–thermal object detection with transformers and prompt tuning,

    R. Chen, D. Li, Z. Gao, Y . Kuai, and C. Wang, “Drone-based visible–thermal object detection with transformers and prompt tuning,” Drones, vol. 8, p. 451, 2024

    2024

  16. [21]

    Multimodal feature-guided pre- training for rgb-t perception,

    J. Ouyang, P. Jin, and Q. Wang, “Multimodal feature-guided pre- training for rgb-t perception,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. , vol. 17, p. 16041–16050, 2024

    2024

  17. [22]

    C 2 former: Calibrated and complementary transformer for rgb-infrared object detection,

    M. Yuan and X. Wei, “C 2 former: Calibrated and complementary transformer for rgb-infrared object detection,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 62, pp. 1–12, 2024

    2024

  18. [23]

    Slbaf-net: Super-lightweight bimodal adaptive fusion network for uav detection in low recognition environment,

    X. Cheng, K. Geng, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y . Sun, and P. Ding, “Slbaf-net: Super-lightweight bimodal adaptive fusion network for uav detection in low recognition environment,” Multimedia Tools Appl. , vol. 82, pp. 47 773–47 792, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Robust detection of non-motorized road users using deep learning on optical and lidar data,

    T. Kim and J. Ghosh, “Robust detection of non-motorized road users using deep learning on optical and lidar data,” in IEEE 19th Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 271–276

    2016

  20. [27]

    Quantum fourier analysis for multivariate functions and applications to a class of schr ¨odinger-type partial differential equations,

    P. Garc ´ıa-Molina, J. Rodr ´ıguez-Mediavilla, and J. J. Garc ´ıa-Ripoll, “Quantum fourier analysis for multivariate functions and applications to a class of schr ¨odinger-type partial differential equations,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 105, p. 012433, 2022

    2022

  21. [28]

    Deformable convnets v2: More deformable, better results,

    X. Zhu, H. Hu, S. Lin, and J. Dai, “Deformable convnets v2: More deformable, better results,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) , 2019, pp. 9308–9316

    2019

  22. [29]

    Fusionmamba: Efficient remote sensing image fusion with state space model,

    S. Peng, X. Zhu, H. Deng, L.-J. Deng, and Z. Lei, “Fusionmamba: Efficient remote sensing image fusion with state space model,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 62, pp. 1–16, 2024

    2024

  23. [30]

    ultralytics/yolov11,

    G. Jocher, “ultralytics/yolov11,” https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics, sep.2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Drone-based rgb-infrared cross-modality vehicle detection via uncertainty-aware learning,

    Y . Sun, B. Cao, P. Zhu, and Q. Hu, “Drone-based rgb-infrared cross-modality vehicle detection via uncertainty-aware learning,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , vol. 32, pp. 6700–6713, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.