Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Large Language Model Powered Intelligent Urban Agents: Concepts, Capabilities, and Applications

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Urban LLM agents are the emerging operating layer of intelligent cities, this survey argues.

desk verdict A broad and mostly accurate survey of a plausible new area, undercut by loose inclusion criteria that classify non-agentic models as agents, plus un-cleaned template text. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00914 v1 pith:6OEQJWPB submitted 2025-07-01 cs.MA cs.AI

Jindong Han , Yansong Ning , Zirui Yuan , Hang Ni , Fan Liu , Tengfei Lyu , Hao Liu This is my paper
classification cs.MAcs.AI
keywords urbanLLMagentsintelligentcitiescomputingspatio-temporalreasoningmulti-agentsystemsplanningtrustworthiness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey proposes that the next stage of intelligent cities will be built around urban LLM agents: large language models configured as semi-embodied agents that perceive city data, reason over space and time, remember urban knowledge, execute actions through tools and infrastructure, and learn from feedback. The authors argue these agents are distinct from generic LLM agents and embodied robots because they operate in the hybrid cyber-physical-social space of cities and aim at system-level optimization rather than individual tasks. The paper's contribution is to give the field a shared vocabulary, a workflow decomposition (sensing, memory, reasoning, execution, learning), a taxonomy of five application domains, and a map of trustworthiness and evaluation challenges. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim to be that this framing is the right roadmap for making LLMs useful to cities.

What carries the argument

The organizing machinery is the perception-cognition-action loop specialized to cities, decomposed into five modules: urban sensing, memory management, reasoning, execution, and learning. The paper also identifies three capability pillars that distinguish urban LLM agents: spatio-temporal data integration (aligning multimodal data across scales), spatio-temporal reasoning (joint inference over road networks, zoning, and time), and spatio-temporal collaboration (mediating among stakeholders with competing goals). These modules and capabilities carry the argument because they are the dimensions along which every surveyed system is classified and compared.

What would settle it

Concrete check: take the systems the survey labels as urban LLM agents and inspect their operation in a sandbox; if a representative sample turns out to be static prompt templates with no tool invocation, no memory, and no feedback-driven adaptation, and they perform identically to a plain LLM given the same context, the category loses its distinguishing content.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that urban LLM agents constitute an emerging foundational paradigm for intelligent cities. An urban LLM agent is defined as an LLM-powered agent that is semi-embodied within the city's cyber-physical-social space and used for system-level urban decision-making; it differs from generic LLM agents by integrating spatio-temporal data, from embodied agents by acting through digital interfaces rather than physical bodies, and from urban foundation models by being agentic: perceiving, planning, executing, and learning. The authors survey the literature to show that this category already exists in practice across urban planning, transportation, environment, public safety, and urban society, and they argue that the field's open problems are trustworthiness (safety, fairness, accountability, privacy) and realistic evaluation grounded in urban digital twins.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that calling these systems 'urban LLM agents' explains something real: that the surveyed projects genuinely are agents with autonomy and closed-loop behavior, rather than a relabeling of ordinary LLM applications or non-agentic urban foundation models.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Urban LLM agents give the field a common definition, letting researchers compare systems across domains using the same five workflow modules.
  • The five application domains (planning, transportation, environment, public safety, urban society) provide a checklist for where LLM agents can be deployed in cities.
  • Trustworthiness issues such as safety, fairness, accountability, and privacy become first-class evaluation criteria rather than afterthoughts.
  • Next-generation benchmarks should simulate the full agentic loop inside urban digital twins, testing perception through feedback-driven learning.
  • The framework predicts that city operations will increasingly be mediated by cognitive intermediaries rather than by task-specific machine-learning models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paradigm holds, city AI procurement and governance would shift from buying point solutions to maintaining agent ecosystems that share memory and tools, an organizational consequence the paper only gestures at.
  • The definition could be tested quantitatively by measuring closed-loop autonomy (tool calls, memory writes, plan revisions) across the surveyed systems and checking whether it clusters into the proposed category.
  • The 'semi-embodied' criterion places urban LLM agents on a spectrum between chatbots and robots, so proposals for full embodiment in urban infrastructure could either extend or dissolve the category.
  • A concrete testable extension is to build the proposed digital-twin benchmark and compare urban LLM agents against fine-tuned spatio-temporal foundation models on identical tasks; if agents do not beat those baselines, the added agentic machinery is not earning its keep.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'Urban LLM Agents' as a new class of LLM-powered agents that are semi-embodied within the cyber-physical-social space of cities and used for system-level urban decision-making. It proposes a conceptual framework, surveys the literature along two axes (agent workflows and application domains), and discusses trustworthiness, evaluation, and future directions. The authors claim that this is the first survey focused specifically on LLM-powered agents designed for urban tasks, and they maintain a curated repository of relevant papers.

Significance. If the proposed boundary holds, the paper would provide a useful shared vocabulary and roadmap for an emerging research area, and its coverage of trustworthiness and evaluation issues is a genuinely valuable addition. The curated resource list and the systematic organization by sensing, memory, reasoning, execution, and learning are strengths. However, the significance depends critically on whether the surveyed systems actually instantiate the proposed 'urban LLM agent' paradigm rather than being ordinary LLM applications, static prediction models, or urban foundation models. The paper's own tables blur this boundary, so the claimed novelty and organizing value are not yet fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.4, Table 2 vs. Tables 4–7] The paper's central distinction between urban LLM agents and generic LLM agents or urban foundation models rests on the semi-embodied, system-level decision-making definition in §2.4.1 and Table 2. However, the application tables classify systems that do not meet this definition as single-agent urban LLM agents. For example, Table 5 lists ClimateBERT [178], a continued-pretrained BERT for climate-text classification, under 'Execution and Collaboration: Single-Agent'; ClimateGPT [163], ChatClimate [165], and ClimaQA [114] are similarly listed as single-agent systems even though the text describes them as RAG or question-answering systems without closed-loop perception–reasoning–action loops. Table 5 also lists Time-LLM [70], a time-series forecasting model, as a single-agent system. If these are included, the claimed novelty over the urban foundation-model surveys reviewed in §2.2 is not established. The authors should state an operational inclusion criterion (e.g., closed-loop perception, planning, tool use, or environment interaction) and either reclassify these works as non-agentic baselines or justify their inclusion explicitly.
  2. [§2.1.3, §4.2.1, Table 4] The citation infrastructure is unreliable in load-bearing places. In §2.1.3 and §4.2.1, LA-Light is cited as [172], but Table 4 lists 'LA-Light [229]', and reference [229] in the bibliography is Zhou et al.'s participatory urban planning paper, not LA-Light. The header still reads 'Trovato et al.', the ACM Reference Format block gives 2018 and a placeholder DOI, and the CCS Concepts line contains placeholder text. A systematic reference audit and template cleanup are needed before the survey can be used as a roadmap.
  3. [Table 6, Public Opinion row] The 'Public Opinion' row in Table 6 groups four unrelated disaster-text studies [52, 190, 157, 30] into a single agent row with no memory, reasoning, or learning entries. The surrounding text describes these as LLM-based social-media text analysis and question-answering systems, not as agents with planning or execution. This row illustrates the boundary problem: without per-paper justification of agency, the taxonomy's cells become labels applied to heterogeneous work, weakening the survey's organizing value.
  4. [§1, §3, §4] The paper asserts that the five workflow components and five application domains form a systematic and up-to-date survey, and that this is the first survey focused specifically on urban LLM agents, but no survey methodology is described. There is no systematic search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criterion, or inter-rater procedure, and the related-survey comparison in Table 1 is presented without explaining how the categories are mutually exclusive. Adding a short methodology subsection that defines the literature collection process and the criteria for calling a system an urban LLM agent would make the survey's coverage and novelty claims verifiable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1.3] There is a typo in 'related tospatio-temporal aspects'; it should read 'related to spatio-temporal aspects'.
  2. [§3.3.1 and Table 5] Time-LLM is cited as [69] in §3.3.1 but as [70] in Table 5; the authors should unify the reference numbering.
  3. [§4.2.1 and Table 4] TransitGPT is cited as [25] in §4.2.1 but as [26] in Table 4; verify which version of the paper is intended and cite consistently.
  4. [§3.5.1] UrbanKGent is cited as [104] in the text, but reference [104] is UrbanKG; the intended citation appears to be [123].
  5. [§6.2] CityBench [40] is described as a benchmark for LLMs as world models, not specifically for agents; the text should clarify whether it evaluates agentic behavior or static model capabilities.
  6. [Figure 2] The milestone timeline in Figure 2 lists system names and years but does not clearly connect each entry to the bibliography; please add citation markers or a legend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's taxonomy is stipulated, not derived, and the authors' self-citations are illustrative rather than load-bearing evidence.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and taxonomy; it contains no fitted parameters, no predictive claim derived from an equation, and no mathematical result whose output equals its input. The central concept of "urban LLM agents" is stipulated in Section 2.4.1 ("We define Urban LLM Agents as a specialized type of LLM-powered agents..."), and the subsequent sections organize external literature under that definition. The authors do cite their own prior systems (LLMLight, CoLLMLight, TP-RAG, DiMA, UrbanKGent, Ni et al.) as representative examples, and Table 1 positions this survey relative to Zhang et al. [215], which shares authors; however, none of these citations carries the survey's argument. The survey's contribution is organizational and would stand even if every self-citation were replaced by independent work. The inclusion of non-agentic models such as ClimateBERT and Time-LLM in the application tables is a boundary/inclusion-criteria weakness, not a circularity, because the paper never claims to derive agenthood from those examples. Therefore, no circular step meets the evidence threshold.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes no free parameters or invented entities. Its central claims rest on domain assumptions about LLM capabilities, about the representativeness and exhaustiveness of its own taxonomy, and on an author-defined boundary around the term 'urban LLM agent'.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption LLMs possess semantic understanding, reasoning, instruction-following, and tool-use capabilities sufficient to support urban decision-making.
    Stated in Sections 1 and 2.1.3; the entire survey depends on this capability assumption.
  • domain assumption The surveyed systems are representative of the emerging 'urban LLM agents' literature and are accurately categorized by the five-component workflow and five-domain application taxonomy.
    Sections 3 and 4 introduce the taxonomies; selection criteria are not formalized, so completeness is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The five workflow components (urban sensing, memory management, reasoning, execution, learning) and five application domains (planning, transportation, environment, public safety, society) form an exhaustive decomposition of the field.
    Proposed in Sections 3 and 4; these categories are author choices, not derived from a deeper theory.
  • ad hoc to paper A distinction between 'urban LLM agents' and generic LLM agents or urban foundation models is meaningful and stable.
    Defined in Section 2.4 with Table 2; if the boundaries are blurry, the survey's scope is arbitrary.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Language Model Powered Intelligent Urban Agents: Concepts, Capabilities, and Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OEQJWPB

@misc{pith2026250700914,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Language Model Powered Intelligent Urban Agents: Concepts, Capabilities, and Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OEQJWPB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00914}
}
read the original abstract

The long-standing vision of intelligent cities is to create efficient, livable, and sustainable urban environments using big data and artificial intelligence technologies. Recently, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new ways toward realizing this vision. With powerful semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities, LLMs can be deployed as intelligent agents capable of autonomously solving complex problems across domains. In this article, we focus on Urban LLM Agents, which are LLM-powered agents that are semi-embodied within the hybrid cyber-physical-social space of cities and used for system-level urban decision-making. First, we introduce the concept of urban LLM agents, discussing their unique capabilities and features. Second, we survey the current research landscape from the perspective of agent workflows, encompassing urban sensing, memory management, reasoning, execution, and learning. Third, we categorize the application domains of urban LLM agents into five groups: urban planning, transportation, environment, public safety, and urban society, presenting representative works in each group. Finally, we discuss trustworthiness and evaluation issues that are critical for real-world deployment, and identify several open problems for future research. This survey aims to establish a foundation for the emerging field of urban LLM agents and to provide a roadmap for advancing the intersection of LLMs and urban intelligence. A curated list of relevant papers and open-source resources is maintained and continuously updated at https://github.com/usail-hkust/Awesome-Urban-LLM-Agents.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00914 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An illustrative example of an intelligent city powered by urban LLM agents. The agents collaborate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Major milestones in the history of urban agents. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The major components of urban LLM agents. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Taxonomy of reasoning in urban LLM agents. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Taxonomy of execution in urban LLM agents. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Taxonomy of learning in urban LLM Agents. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An overview of urban LLM agent from application-centric perspective. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Entropy-Constrained Strategy Optimization in Urban Floods: A Multi-Agent Framework with LLM and Knowledge Graph Integration

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    H-J, a hierarchical LLM multi-agent framework with knowledge retrieval, entropy constraints, and closed-loop feedback, outperforms rule-based and PPO baselines in simulated urban flood dispatch across three rainfall s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

241 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [229]

    Zhilun Zhou, Yuming Lin, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2024. Large language model for participatory urban planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17161 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [172]

    Zaib Ullah, Fadi Al-Turjman, Leonardo Mostarda, and Roberto Gagliardi. 2020. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart cities. Computer Communications 154 (2020), 313–323

    2020

  3. [178]

    Nicolas Webersinke, Mathias Kraus, Julia Anna Bingler, and Markus Leippold. 2021. Climatebert: A pretrained language model for climate-related text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.12010 (2021)

    arXiv 2021

  4. [163]

    David Thulke, Yingbo Gao, Petrus Pelser, Rein Brune, Rricha Jalota, Floris Fok, Michael Ramos, Ian van Wyk, Abdallah Nasir, Hayden Goldstein, et al . 2024. Climategpt: Towards ai synthesizing interdisciplinary research on climate change. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09646 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  5. [165]

    Saeid Ashraf Vaghefi, Dominik Stammbach, Veruska Muccione, Julia Bingler, Jingwei Ni, Mathias Kraus, Simon Allen, Chiara Colesanti-Senni, Tobias Wekhof, Tobias Schimanski, et al. 2023. ChatClimate: Grounding conversational AI in climate science. Communications Earth & Environment 4, 1 (2023), 480

    2023

  6. [114]

    P Lowrie. 1990. Scats-a traffic responsive method of controlling urban traffic. Sales information brochure published by Roads & Traffic Authority, Sydney, Australia (1990)

    1990

  7. [70]

    Ming Jin, Shiyu Wang, Lintao Ma, Zhixuan Chu, James Y Zhang, Xiaoming Shi, Pin-Yu Chen, Yuxuan Liang, Yuan-Fang Li, Shirui Pan, et al. 2023. Time-llm: Time series forecasting by reprogramming large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01728 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  8. [1]

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

Show all 241 references
  1. [2]

    Ritesh Ahuja, Sepanta Zeighami, Gabriel Ghinita, and Cyrus Shahabi. 2023. A neural approach to spatio-temporal data release with user-level differential privacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data 1, 1 (2023), 1–25

    2023

  2. [3]

    Temitope Akinboyewa, Zhenlong Li, Huan Ning, and M Naser Lessani. 2024. GIS copilot: Towards an autonomous GIS agent for spatial analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03205 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  3. [4]

    Md Mahbub Alam, Luis Torgo, and Albert Bifet. 2022. A survey on spatio-temporal data analytics systems. Comput. Surveys 54, 10s (2022), 1–38

    2022

  4. [5]

    Md Morshed Alam and Weichao Wang. 2021. A comprehensive survey on the state-of-the-art data provenance approaches for security enforcement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01678 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  5. [6]

    Louai Alarabi, Mohamed F Mokbel, and Mashaal Musleh. 2018. St-hadoop: A mapreduce framework for spatio- temporal data. GeoInformatica 22 (2018), 785–813

    2018

  6. [7]

    Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. 2016. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  7. [8]

    Pasquale Balsebre, Weiming Huang, and Gao Cong. 2024. LAMP: A language model on the map. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09059 (2024). J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, Article 111. Publication date: August 2018. 111:36 Trovato et al

    2024 arXiv

  8. [9]

    Ciro Beneduce, Bruno Lepri, and Massimiliano Luca. 2024. Large language models are zero-shot next location predictors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20962 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  9. [10]

    Luís MA Bettencourt. 2024. Recent achievements and conceptual challenges for urban digital twins. Nature Computa- tional Science 4, 3 (2024), 150–153

    2024

  10. [11]

    Prabin Bhandari, Antonios Anastasopoulos, and Dieter Pfoser. 2024. Urban mobility assessment using llms. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems . 67–79

    2024

  11. [12]

    Simon Elias Bibri and John Krogstie. 2017. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable cities and society 31 (2017), 183–212

    2017

  12. [13]

    Chris Bousquet. 2018. Algorithmic fairness: Tackling bias in city algorithms. Data-Smart City Solutions (2018)

    2018

  13. [14]

    Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, et al. 2024. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology 15, 3 (2024), 1–45

    2024

  14. [15]

    Aili Chen, Xuyang Ge, Ziquan Fu, Yanghua Xiao, and Jiangjie Chen. 2024. TravelAgent: An AI assistant for personalized travel planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08069 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [16]

    Boyuan Chen, Zhuo Xu, Sean Kirmani, Brain Ichter, Dorsa Sadigh, Leonidas Guibas, and Fei Xia. 2024. Spatialvlm: Endowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capabilities. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 14455–14465

    2024

  16. [17]

    Zhida Chen, Lisi Chen, Gao Cong, and Christian S Jensen. 2021. Location-and keyword-based querying of geo-textual data: a survey. The VLDB Journal 30, 4 (2021), 603–640

    2021

  17. [18]

    Yuheng Cheng, Huan Zhao, Xiyuan Zhou, Junhua Zhao, Yuji Cao, Chao Yang, and Xinlei Cai. 2025. A large language model for advanced power dispatch. Scientific Reports 15, 1 (2025), 8925

    2025

  18. [19]

    Ayush Chopra, Shashank Kumar, Nurullah Giray-Kuru, Ramesh Raskar, and Arnau Quera-Bofarull. 2024. On the limits of agency in agent-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10568 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  19. [20]

    Panayiotis Christou, Md Zahidul Islam, Yuzhang Lin, and Jingwei Xiong. 2025. LLM4DistReconfig: A Fine-tuned Large Language Model for Power Distribution Network Reconfiguration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14960 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  20. [21]

    Zheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu, Haotian Wang, Ming Liu, and Bing Qin. 2024. TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Li...

    2024

  21. [22]

    Rita Cucchiara, Massimo Piccardi, and Paola Mello. 2000. Image analysis and rule-based reasoning for a traffic monitoring system. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 1, 2 (2000), 119–130

    2000

  22. [23]

    Longchao Da, Minchiuan Gao, Hao Mei, and Hua Wei. 2023. Llm powered sim-to-real transfer for traffic signal control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14284 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  23. [24]

    Longchao Da, Kuanru Liou, Tiejin Chen, Xuesong Zhou, Xiangyong Luo, Yezhou Yang, and Hua Wei. 2024. Open-ti: Open traffic intelligence with augmented language model. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 15, 10 (2024), 4761–4786

    2024

  24. [25]

    Saipraneeth Devunuri and Lewis Lehe. 2024. TransitGPT: A Generative AI-based framework for interacting with GTFS data using Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06831 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  25. [26]

    Saipraneeth Devunuri and Lewis Lehe. 2025. TransitGPT: A Generative AI-based framework for interacting with GTFS data using Large Language Models. Public Transport (2025), 1–27

    2025

  26. [27]

    Suvodip Dey, Yi-Jyun Sun, Gokhan Tur, and Dilek Hakkani-Tur. 2025. Towards Preventing Overreliance on Task- Oriented Conversational AI Through Accountability Modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10316 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  27. [28]

    Adrian Dobra, Nathalie E Williams, and Nathan Eagle. 2015. Spatiotemporal detection of unusual human population behavior using mobile phone data. PloS one 10, 3 (2015), e0120449

    2015

  28. [29]

    Yuwei Du, Jie Feng, Jie Zhao, and Yong Li. 2024. TrajAgent: An Agent Framework for Unified Trajectory Modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20445 (2024)

    2024

  29. [30]

    Dilan Durmus, Alberto Giretti, Ori Ashkenazi, Alessandro Carbonari, Shabtai Isaac, et al. 2024. The Role of Large Language Models for Decision Support in Fire Safety Planning. PROCEEDINGS OF THE... ISARC (2024), 339–346

    2024

  30. [31]

    Bingbing Fan, Lin Chen, Songwei Li, Jian Yuan, Fengli Xu, Pan Hui, and Yong Li. 2025. Invisible Walls in Cities: Leveraging Large Language Models to Predict Urban Segregation Experience with Social Media Content. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04773 (2025)

    2025

  31. [32]

    Jinxiao Fan, Haolin Chu, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. 2024. LLMAir: Adaptive Reprogramming Large Language Model for Air Quality Prediction. In 2024 IEEE 30th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS). IEEE, 423–430

    2024

  32. [33]

    Wei Fan, Pengyang Wang, Dongkun Wang, Dongjie Wang, Yuanchun Zhou, and Yanjie Fu. 2023. Dish-ts: a general paradigm for alleviating distribution shift in time series forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 37. 7522–7529. J. ACM, Vol....

    2023

  33. [34]

    Wei Fan, Shun Zheng, Xiaohan Yi, Wei Cao, Yanjie Fu, Jiang Bian, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2022. DEPTS: Deep expansion learning for periodic time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07681 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  34. [35]

    Bowen Fang, Zixiao Yang, Shukai Wang, and Xuan Di. 2024. TraveLLM: Could you plan my new public transit route in face of a network disruption? arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14926 (2024)

    2024

  35. [36]

    Yuchen Fang, Hao Miao, Yuxuan Liang, Liwei Deng, Yue Cui, Ximu Zeng, Yuyang Xia, Yan Zhao, Torben Bach Pedersen, Christian S Jensen, et al. 2025. Unraveling Spatio-Temporal Foundation Models via the Pipeline Lens: A Comprehensive Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01364 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  36. [37]

    Bahare Fatemi, Mehran Kazemi, Anton Tsitsulin, Karishma Malkan, Jinyeong Yim, John Palowitch, Sungyong Seo, Jonathan Halcrow, and Bryan Perozzi. 2024. Test of time: A benchmark for evaluating llms on temporal reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09170 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  37. [38]

    Jie Feng, Yuwei Du, Tianhui Liu, Siqi Guo, Yuming Lin, and Yong Li. 2024. Citygpt: Empowering urban spatial cognition of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13948 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [39]

    Jie Feng, Yuwei Du, Jie Zhao, and Yong Li. 2024. Agentmove: Predicting human mobility anywhere using large language model based agentic framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13986 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  39. [40]

    Jie Feng, Jun Zhang, Junbo Yan, Xin Zhang, Tianjian Ouyang, Tianhui Liu, Yuwei Du, Siqi Guo, and Yong Li. 2024. Citybench: Evaluating the capabilities of large language model as world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13945 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [41]

    Kyle Gao, Dening Lu, Liangzhi Li, Nan Chen, Hongjie He, Linlin Xu, and Jonathan Li. 2025. Instructor-Worker Large Language Model System for Policy Recommendation: a Case Study on Air Quality Analysis of the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00566 (2025)

    2025

  41. [42]

    Malik Ghallab, Dana Nau, and Paolo Traverso. 2004. Automated Planning: theory and practice . Elsevier

    2004

  42. [43]

    Adam Goodge, Wee Siong Ng, Bryan Hooi, and See Kiong Ng. 2025. Spatio-Temporal Foundation Models: Vision, Challenges, and Opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09045 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  43. [44]

    Nate Gruver, Marc Finzi, Shikai Qiu, and Andrew G Wilson. 2023. Large language models are zero-shot time series forecasters. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 19622–19635

    2023

  44. [45]

    Qinghua Guan, Jinhui Ouyang, Di Wu, and Weiren Yu. 2024. CityGPT: Towards Urban IoT Learning, Analysis and Interaction with Multi-Agent System. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14691 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  45. [46]

    Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. 2025. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  46. [47]

    Taicheng Guo, Xiuying Chen, Yaqi Wang, Ruidi Chang, Shichao Pei, Nitesh V Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2024. Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01680 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  47. [48]

    Jindong Han, Hao Liu, Shui Liu, Xi Chen, Naiqiang Tan, Hua Chai, and Hui Xiong. 2023. iETA: A robust and scalable incremental learning framework for time-of-arrival estimation. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 4100–4111

    2023

  48. [49]

    Jindong Han, Hao Liu, Haoyi Xiong, and Jing Yang. 2022. Semi-supervised air quality forecasting via self-supervised hierarchical graph neural network. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35, 5 (2022), 5230–5243

    2022

  49. [50]

    Jindong Han, Hao Liu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, and Dejing Dou. 2021. Joint air quality and weather prediction based on multi-adversarial spatiotemporal networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 35. 4081–4089

    2021

  50. [51]

    Jindong Han, Weijia Zhang, Hao Liu, Tao Tao, Naiqiang Tan, and Hui Xiong. 2024. Bigst: Linear complexity spatio-temporal graph neural network for traffic forecasting on large-scale road networks. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 17, 5 (2024), 1081–1090

    2024

  51. [52]

    Jin Han, Zhe Zheng, Xin-Zheng Lu, Ke-Yin Chen, and Jia-Rui Lin. 2024. Enhanced earthquake impact analysis based on social media texts via large language model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 109 (2024), 104574

    2024

  52. [53]

    Sang-Yun Han and Tschangho John Kim. 1990. ESSAS: expert system for site analysis and selection. InExpert systems: applications to urban planning . Springer, 145–158

    1990

  53. [54]

    Xiao Han, Zijian Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao, Guojiang Shen, Xiangjie Kong, Xuetao Wei, Liqiang Nie, and Jieping Ye

  54. [55]

    Xixuan Hao, Wei Chen, Yibo Yan, Siru Zhong, Kun Wang, Qingsong Wen, and Yuxuan Liang. 2024. UrbanVLP: Multi-Granularity Vision-Language Pretraining for Urban Socioeconomic Indicator Prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16831 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [56]

    Lyulong He, Hongyuan Zhang, Kunxiao Liu, and Xi Wu. 2024. Multi-Agent Enhanced Complex Decision-Making Support Framework: An Urban Emergency Case Study. In 2024 6th International Conference on Frontier Technologies of Information and Computer (ICFTIC) . IEEE, 413–419. J. ACM, ...

    2024

  56. [57]

    Ce Hou, Fan Zhang, Yong Li, Haifeng Li, Gengchen Mai, Yuhao Kang, Ling Yao, Wenhao Yu, Yao Yao, Song Gao, et al

  57. [58]

    Chengyu Hu, Junyi Cai, Deze Zeng, Xuesong Yan, Wenyin Gong, and Ling Wang. 2020. Deep reinforcement learning based valve scheduling for pollution isolation in water distribution network. Math. Biosci. Eng 17, 1 (2020), 105–122

    2020

  58. [59]

    Hanxu Hu, Hongyuan Lu, Huajian Zhang, Yun-Ze Song, Wai Lam, and Yue Zhang. 2024. Chain-of-Symbol Prompting For Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models. In First Conference on Language Modeling

    2024

  59. [60]

    Xiannan Huang. 2024. Enhancing traffic prediction with textual data using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06719 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  60. [61]

    James N Hughes, Andrew Annex, Christopher N Eichelberger, Anthony Fox, Andrew Hulbert, and Michael Ronquest

  61. [62]

    PB Hunt, DI Robertson, RD Bretherton, and M Cr Royle. 1982. The SCOOT on-line traffic signal optimisation technique. Traffic Engineering & Control 23, 4 (1982)

    1982

  62. [63]

    Koichi Ito, Yuhao Kang, Ye Zhang, Fan Zhang, and Filip Biljecki. 2024. Understanding urban perception with visual data: A systematic review. Cities 152 (2024), 105169

    2024

  63. [64]

    Shenggong Ji, Yu Zheng, Wenjun Wang, and Tianrui Li. 2019. Real-time ambulance redeployment: A data-driven approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 32, 11 (2019), 2213–2226

    2019

  64. [65]

    Yue Jiang, Qin Chao, Yile Chen, Xiucheng Li, Shuai Liu, and Gao Cong. 2024. Urbanllm: Autonomous urban activity planning and management with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12360 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  65. [66]

    Zihao Jiao, Mengyi Sha, Haoyu Zhang, Xinyu Jiang, and Wei Qi. 2024. City-LEO: Toward Transparent City Management Using LLM with End-to-End Optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10958 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  66. [67]

    WANG JIAWEI, Renhe Jiang, Chuang Yang, Zengqing Wu, Ryosuke Shibasaki, Noboru Koshizuka, Chuan Xiao, et al

  67. [68]

    Guangyin Jin, Yuxuan Liang, Yuchen Fang, Zezhi Shao, Jincai Huang, Junbo Zhang, and Yu Zheng. 2023. Spatio- temporal graph neural networks for predictive learning in urban computing: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 36, 10 (2023), 5388–5408

    2023

  68. [69]

    Ming Jin, Shiyu Wang, Lintao Ma, Zhixuan Chu, James Zhang, Xiaoming Shi, Pin-Yu Chen, Yuxuan Liang, Yuan-fang Li, Shirui Pan, et al . 2024. Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models. In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2024

  69. [71]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 124547–124574

    Large language models as urban residents: An llm agent framework for personal mobility generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 124547–124574

    2024

  70. [72]

    Yilun Jin, Kai Chen, and Qiang Yang. 2023. Transferable graph structure learning for graph-based traffic forecasting across cities. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 1032–1043

    2023

  71. [73]

    Yuping Jin and Jun Ma. 2024. Large language model as parking planning agent in the context of mixed period of autonomous vehicles and Human-Driven vehicles. Sustainable Cities and Society 117 (2024), 105940

    2024

  72. [74]

    Chenlu Ju, Jiaxin Liu, Shobhit Sinha, Hao Xue, and Flora Salim. 2025. TrajLLM: A Modular LLM-Enhanced Agent-Based Framework for Realistic Human Trajectory Simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18712 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  73. [75]

    Yilun Jin, Kai Chen, and Qiang Yang. 2022. Selective cross-city transfer learning for traffic prediction via source city region re-weighting. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 731–741

    2022

  74. [76]

    Anna Kalyuzhnaya, Sergey Mityagin, Elizaveta Lutsenko, Andrey Getmanov, Yaroslav Aksenkin, Kamil Fatkhiev, Kirill Fedorin, Nikolay O Nikitin, Natalia Chichkova, Vladimir Vorona, et al. 2025. LLM Agents for Smart City Management: Enhancing Decision Support Through Multi-Agent A...

    2025

  75. [77]

    Peter Koonce et al. 2008. Traffic signal timing manual . Technical Report. United States. Federal Highway Administra- tion

    2008

  76. [78]

    Komal Kumar, Tajamul Ashraf, Omkar Thawakar, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Hisham Cholakkal, Mubarak Shah, Ming- Hsuan Yang, Phillip HS Torr, Salman Khan, and Fahad Shahbaz Khan. 2025. Llm post-training: A deep dive into reasoning large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21321 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  77. [79]

    Jean Kaddour, Joshua Harris, Maximilian Mozes, Herbie Bradley, Roberta Raileanu, and Robert McHardy. 2023. Challenges and applications of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10169 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  78. [80]

    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing s...

    2020

  79. [81]

    Bohang Li, Kai Zhang, Yiping Sun, and Jianke Zou. 2024. Research on travel route planning optimization based on large language model. In 2024 6th International Conference on Data-driven Optimization of Complex Systems (DOCS) . IEEE, 352–357

    2024

  80. [82]

    Fangjun Li, David C Hogg, and Anthony G Cohn. 2024. Advancing spatial reasoning in large language models: An in-depth evaluation and enhancement using the stepgame benchmark. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38. 18500–18507

    2024

  81. [83]

    Siqi Lai, Zhao Xu, Weijia Zhang, Hao Liu, and Hui Xiong. 2023. LLMLight: Large Language Models as Traffic Signal Control Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16044 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  82. [84]

    Guohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. 2023. Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 51991–52008

    2023

  83. [85]

    Nian Li, Chen Gao, Mingyu Li, Yong Li, and Qingmin Liao. 2023. Econagent: large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroeconomic activities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10436 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  84. [86]

    Peibo Li, Maarten de Rijke, Hao Xue, Shuang Ao, Yang Song, and Flora D Salim. 2024. Large language models for next point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval . 1463–1472

    2024

  85. [87]

    Fangjun Li, David C Hogg, and Anthony G Cohn. 2024. Reframing spatial reasoning evaluation in language models: a real-world simulation benchmark for qualitative reasoning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 6342–6349

    2024

  86. [88]

    Wenbin Li, Di Yao, Ruibo Zhao, Wenjie Chen, Zijie Xu, Chengxue Luo, Chang Gong, Quanliang Jing, Haining Tan, and Jingping Bi. 2024. STBench: Assessing the ability of large language models in spatio-temporal analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19065 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  87. [89]

    Xuchuan Li, Fei Huang, Jianrong Lv, Zhixiong Xiao, Guolong Li, and Yang Yue. 2024. Be more real: Travel diary generation using llm agents and individual profiles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18932 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  88. [90]

    Yiming Li, Yong Jiang, Zhifeng Li, and Shu-Tao Xia. 2022. Backdoor learning: A survey. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 35, 1 (2022), 5–22

    2022

  89. [91]

    Ruiyuan Li, Huajun He, Rubin Wang, Yuchuan Huang, Junwen Liu, Sijie Ruan, Tianfu He, Jie Bao, and Yu Zheng

  90. [92]

    Zhonghang Li, Lianghao Xia, Xubin Ren, Jiabin Tang, Tianyi Chen, Yong Xu, and Chao Huang. 2025. Urban Computing in the Era of Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02009 (2025)

    2025

  91. [93]

    Zhonghang Li, Lianghao Xia, Jiabin Tang, Yong Xu, Lei Shi, Long Xia, Dawei Yin, and Chao Huang. 2024. Urbangpt: Spatio-temporal large language models. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5351–5362

    2024

  92. [94]

    Yuxuan Liang, Haomin Wen, Yutong Xia, Ming Jin, Bin Yang, Flora Salim, Qingsong Wen, Shirui Pan, and Gao Cong

  93. [95]

    Haowei Lin, Zihao Wang, Jianzhu Ma, and Yitao Liang. 2023. Mcu: A task-centric framework for open-ended agent evaluation in minecraft. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08367 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  94. [96]

    Yuanchun Li, Hao Wen, Weijun Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yizhen Yuan, Guohong Liu, Jiacheng Liu, Wenxing Xu, Xiang Wang, Yi Sun, et al. 2024. Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capability, efficiency and security. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05459 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  95. [97]

    Fan Liu, Zhao Xu, and Hao Liu. 2024. Adversarial tuning: Defending against jailbreak attacks for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06622 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  96. [98]

    Fan Liu, Weijia Zhang, and Hao Liu. 2023. Robust spatiotemporal traffic forecasting with reinforced dynamic adversarial training. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 1417–1428

    2023

  97. [99]

    Huaping Liu, Di Guo, and Angelo Cangelosi. 2025. Embodied Intelligence: A Synergy of Morphology, Action, Perception and Learning. Comput. Surveys (2025)

    2025

  98. [100]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13502 (2025)

    Foundation Models for Spatio-Temporal Data Science: A Tutorial and Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13502 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  99. [101]

    Mingzhe Liu, Liang Zhang, Jianli Chen, Wei-An Chen, Zhiyao Yang, L James Lo, Jin Wen, and Zheng O’Neill. 2025. Large language models for building energy applications: Opportunities and challenges. In Building Simulation . Springer, 1–10. J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, Article 111. Pu...

    2025

  100. [102]

    Kaixiang Lin, Renyu Zhao, Zhe Xu, and Jiayu Zhou. 2018. Efficient large-scale fleet management via multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 1774–1783

    2018

  101. [103]

    Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Kailong Wang, Zihao Wang, Xiaofeng Wang, Tianwei Zhang, Yepang Liu, Haoyu Wang, Yan Zheng, et al. 2023. Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05499 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  102. [104]

    Yu Liu, Jingtao Ding, Yanjie Fu, and Yong Li. 2023. Urbankg: An urban knowledge graph system. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 14, 4 (2023), 1–25

    2023

  103. [105]

    Yupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Runpeng Geng, Jinyuan Jia, and Neil Zhenqiang Gong. 2024. Formalizing and benchmarking prompt injection attacks and defenses. In 33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24) . 1831–1847

    2024

  104. [106]

    Hao Liu, Jindong Han, Yanjie Fu, Jingbo Zhou, Xinjiang Lu, and Hui Xiong. 2020. Multi-modal transportation recommendation with unified route representation learning. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 14, 3 (2020), 342–350

    2020

  105. [107]

    Yang Liu, Yuanshun Yao, Jean-Francois Ton, Xiaoying Zhang, Ruocheng Guo, Hao Cheng, Yegor Klochkov, Muham- mad Faaiz Taufiq, and Hang Li. 2023. Trustworthy llms: a survey and guideline for evaluating large language models’ alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05374 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  106. [108]

    Yang Liu, Weixing Chen, Yongjie Bai, Xiaodan Liang, Guanbin Li, Wen Gao, and Liang Lin. 2024. Aligning cyber space with physical world: A comprehensive survey on embodied ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06886 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  107. [109]

    Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, and David Ha. 2024. The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  108. [110]

    Hao Lu, Xingwen Zhang, and Shuang Yang. 2019. A learning-based iterative method for solving vehicle routing problems. In International conference on learning representations

    2019

  109. [111]

    Yan Lyu, Hangxin Lu, Min Kyung Lee, Gerhard Schmitt, and Brian Y Lim. 2023. IF-City: Intelligible fair city planning to measure, explain and mitigate inequality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023)

    2023

  110. [112]

    Yang Liu, Fanyou Wu, Zhiyuan Liu, Kai Wang, Feiyue Wang, and Xiaobo Qu. 2023. Can language models be used for real-world urban-delivery route optimization? The Innovation 4, 6 (2023)

    2023

  111. [113]

    Gengchen Mai, Weiming Huang, Jin Sun, Suhang Song, Deepak Mishra, Ninghao Liu, Song Gao, Tianming Liu, Gao Cong, Yingjie Hu, et al. 2024. On the opportunities and challenges of foundation models for geoai (vision paper). ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems 10, 2...

    2024

  112. [115]

    Jinzhu Mao, Liu Cao, Chen Gao, Huandong Wang, Hangyu Fan, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2023. Detecting vulnerable nodes in urban infrastructure interdependent network. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 4617–4627

    2023

  113. [116]

    Saul McLeod. 2007. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply psychology 1, 1-18 (2007)

    2007

  114. [117]

    Xinyi Mou, Xuanwen Ding, Qi He, Liang Wang, Jingcong Liang, Xinnong Zhang, Libo Sun, Jiayu Lin, Jie Zhou, Xuanjing Huang, et al. 2024. From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03563 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  115. [118]

    Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, et al. 2023. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 46534–46594

    2023

  116. [119]

    Hang Ni, Yuzhi Wang, and Hao Liu. 2024. Planning, Living and Judging: A Multi-agent LLM-based Framework for Cyclical Urban Planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20505 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  117. [120]

    Veeramakali Vignesh Manivannan, Yasaman Jafari, Srikar Eranky, Spencer Ho, Rose Yu, Duncan Watson-Parris, Yian Ma, Leon Bergen, and Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick. 2024. ClimaQA: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Climate Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16701 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  118. [121]

    Huan Ning, Zhenlong Li, Temitope Akinboyewa, and M Naser Lessani. 2024. LLM-Find: An Autonomous GIS Agent Framework for Geospatial Data Retrieval. arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv–2407

    2024

  119. [122]

    Yansong Ning, Shuowei Cai, Wei Li, Jun Fang, Naiqiang Tan, Hua Chai, and Hao Liu. 2025. DiMA: An LLM-Powered Ride-Hailing Assistant at DiDi. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04768 (2025)

    2025

  120. [123]

    Yansong Ning and Hao Liu. 2024. UrbanKGent: A Unified Large Language Model Agent Framework for Urban Knowledge Graph Construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06861 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  121. [124]

    Hang Ni, Fan Liu, Xinyu Ma, Lixin Su, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Hui Xiong, and Hao Liu. 2025. TP-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Agents for Spatiotemporal-Aware Travel Planning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08694 (2025)

    2025

  122. [125]

    Hakan T Otal, Eric Stern, and M Abdullah Canbaz. 2024. Llm-assisted crisis management: Building advanced llm platforms for effective emergency response and public collaboration. In 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI). IEEE, 851–859. J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, Ar...

    2024

  123. [126]

    Tong Nie, Junlin He, Yuewen Mei, Guoyang Qin, Guilong Li, Jian Sun, and Wei Ma. 2025. Joint estimation and prediction of city-wide delivery demand: A large language model empowered graph-based learning approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Revi...

    2025

  124. [127]

    James Jie Pan, Jianguo Wang, and Guoliang Li. 2024. Survey of vector database management systems. The VLDB Journal 33, 5 (2024), 1591–1615

    2024

  125. [128]

    Aoyu Pang, Maonan Wang, Man-On Pun, Chung Shue Chen, and Xi Xiong. 2024. iLLM-TSC: Integration reinforcement learning and large language model for traffic signal control policy improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06025 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  126. [129]

    Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2023. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology . 1–22

    2023

  127. [130]

    Yansong Ning, Hao Liu, Hao Wang, Zhenyu Zeng, and Hui Xiong. 2023. UUKG: Unified urban knowledge graph dataset for urban spatiotemporal prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 62442–62456

    2023

  128. [131]

    Dawn C Parker, Steven M Manson, Marco A Janssen, Matthew J Hoffmann, and Peter Deadman. 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the association of American Geographers 93, 2 (2003), 314–337

    2003

  129. [132]

    Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in neural information processing systems 35...

    2022

  130. [133]

    Jinghua Piao, Yuwei Yan, Jun Zhang, Nian Li, Junbo Yan, Xiaochong Lan, Zhihong Lu, Zhiheng Zheng, Jing Yi Wang, Di Zhou, et al . 2025. AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society. arXiv preprint arX...

    2025 arXiv

  131. [134]

    Zihang Qiu, Chaojie Li, Zhongyang Wang, Renyou Xie, Borui Zhang, Huadong Mo, Guo Chen, and Zhaoyang Dong

  132. [135]

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1, 8 (2019), 9

    2019

  133. [136]

    Joon Sung Park, Carolyn Q Zou, Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill, Carrie Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Robb Willer, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2024. Generative agent simulations of 1,000 people. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10109 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  134. [137]

    Muhammad Ashar Reza, Aaditya Bisaria, S Advaitha, Alekhya Ponnekanti, and Arti Arya. [n. d.]. CriX: Intersection of Crime, Demographics and Explainable AI. ([n. d.])

  135. [138]

    Ethan Perez, Saffron Huang, Francis Song, Trevor Cai, Roman Ring, John Aslanides, Amelia Glaese, Nat McAleese, and Geoffrey Irving. 2022. Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing...

    2022

  136. [139]

    Md Imbesat Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu, and Iryna Gurevych. 2024. SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computatio...

    2024

  137. [140]

    David Rolnick, Priya L Donti, Lynn H Kaack, Kelly Kochanski, Alexandre Lacoste, Kris Sankaran, Andrew Slavin Ross, Nikola Milojevic-Dupont, Natasha Jaques, Anna Waldman-Brown, et al. 2022. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 55, 2 (2022), 1–96

    2022

  138. [141]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00852 (2024)

    EF-LLM: Energy Forecasting LLM with AI-assisted Automation, Enhanced Sparse Prediction, Hallucination Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00852 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  139. [142]

    As’ ad Salkham, Raymond Cunningham, Anurag Garg, and Vinny Cahill. 2008. A collaborative reinforcement learning approach to urban traffic control optimization. In 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Vol. 2. IEEE, 560–566

    2008

  140. [143]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of machine learning research 21, 140 (2020), 1–67

    2020

  141. [144]

    Abdur R Shahid, Syed Mhamudul Hasan, Malithi Wanniarachchi Kankanamge, Md Zarif Hossain, and Ahmed Imteaj

  142. [145]

    Why should i trust you?

    Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. " Why should i trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 1135–1144

    2016

  143. [146]

    Lee Sharkey, Clíodhna Ní Ghuidhir, Dan Braun, Jérémy Scheurer, Mikita Balesni, Lucius Bushnaq, Charlotte Stix, and Marius Hobbhahn. 2024. A causal framework for AI regulation and auditing. Publisher: Preprints (2024). J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, Article 111. Publication date: Augu...

    2024

  144. [147]

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2023. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 8634–8652

    2023

  145. [148]

    Stuart J Russell and Peter Norvig. 2016. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach . pearson

    2016

  146. [149]

    Charlie Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, and Aviral Kumar. 2024. Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03314 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  147. [150]

    Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2023. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 68...

    2023

  148. [151]

    Thomas Steinke. 2022. Composition of differential privacy & privacy amplification by subsampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00597 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  149. [152]

    In 2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)

    WatchOverGPT: A Framework for Real-Time Crime Detection and Response Using Wearable Camera and Large Language Model. In 2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) . IEEE, 2189–2194

    2024

  150. [153]

    Chenyang Shao, Fengli Xu, Bingbing Fan, Jingtao Ding, Yuan Yuan, Meng Wang, and Yong Li. 2024. Chain-of-planned- behaviour workflow elicits few-shot mobility generation in LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09836 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  151. [154]

    Lichao Sun, Yingtong Dou, Carl Yang, Kai Zhang, Ji Wang, Philip S Yu, Lifang He, and Bo Li. 2022. Adversarial attack and defense on graph data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35, 8 (2022), 7693–7711

    2022

  152. [155]

    Lichao Sun, Yue Huang, Haoran Wang, Siyuan Wu, Qihui Zhang, Chujie Gao, Yixin Huang, Wenhan Lyu, Yixuan Zhang, Xiner Li, et al. 2024. Trustllm: Trustworthiness in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05561 3 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  153. [156]

    Pratham Singla, Ayush Singh, Adesh Gupta, and Shivank Garg. 2024. Adaptive Urban Planning: A Hybrid Framework for Balanced City Development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15349 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  154. [157]

    Yimin Sun, Chao Wang, and Yan Peng. 2023. Unleashing the potential of large language model: Zero-shot vqa for flood disaster scenario. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering . 368–373

    2023

  155. [158]

    Seyyid Emre Sofuoglu and Selin Aviyente. 2022. Gloss: Tensor-based anomaly detection in spatiotemporal urban traffic data. Signal Processing 192 (2022), 108370

    2022

  156. [159]

    Mingjie Tang, Yongyang Yu, Qutaibah M Malluhi, Mourad Ouzzani, and Walid G Aref. 2016. Locationspark: A distributed in-memory data management system for big spatial data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 9, 13 (2016), 1565–1568

    2016

  157. [160]

    Zhaochen Su, Juntao Li, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Pan Zhou, Yan Bowen, Yu Cheng, et al. 2024. Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning? arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09072 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  158. [161]

    Zhaochen Su, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Juntao Li, Yu Cheng, et al. [n. d.]. Timo: Towards Better Temporal Reasoning for Language Models. In First Conference on Language Modeling

  159. [162]

    Dennis F Thompson. 1980. Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. American Political Science Review 74, 4 (1980), 905–916

    1980

  160. [164]

    Qian Sun, Rui Zha, Le Zhang, Jingbo Zhou, Yu Mei, Zhiling Li, and Hui Xiong. 2024. CrossLight: Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning for Cross-City Traffic Signal Control. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 2765–2774

    2024

  161. [166]

    Qingyu Tan, Hwee Tou Ng, and Lidong Bing. 2023. Towards Benchmarking and Improving the Temporal Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) . 14820–14835

    2023

  162. [167]

    Deepank Verma, Olaf Mumm, and Vanessa Miriam Carlow. 2023. Generative agents in the streets: Exploring the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in collecting urban perceptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13126 (2023)

    2023

  163. [168]

    Yiqing Tang, Xingyuan Dai, Chen Zhao, Qi Cheng, and Yisheng Lv. 2024. Large language model-driven urban traffic signal control. In 2024 Australian & New Zealand Control Conference (ANZCC) . IEEE, 67–71

    2024

  164. [169]

    Yihong Tang, Zhaokai Wang, Ao Qu, Yihao Yan, Zhaofeng Wu, Dingyi Zhuang, Jushi Kai, Kebing Hou, Xiaotong Guo, Jinhua Zhao, et al. 2024. ItiNera: Integrating Spatial Optimization with Large Language Models for Open-domain Urban Itinerary Planning. In Proceedings of the 2024 Con...

    2024

  165. [170]

    Chengsen Wang, Qi Qi, Jingyu Wang, Haifeng Sun, Zirui Zhuang, Jinming Wu, Lei Zhang, and Jianxin Liao. 2025. Chattime: A unified multimodal time series foundation model bridging numerical and textual data. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol....

    2025

  166. [171]

    Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. 2024. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science 18, 6 (2024), 186345

    2024

  167. [173]

    Xinglei Wang, Meng Fang, Zichao Zeng, and Tao Cheng. 2023. Where would i go next? large language models as human mobility predictors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15197 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  168. [174]

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  169. [175]

    Yiding Wang, Yuxuan Chen, Fangwei Zhong, Long Ma, and Yizhou Wang. 2024. Simulating Human-like Daily Activities with Desire-driven Autonomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06435 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  170. [176]

    Leonie von Wahl, Nicolas Tempelmeier, Ashutosh Sao, and Elena Demidova. 2022. Reinforcement learning-based placement of charging stations in urban road networks. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 3992–4000

    2022

  171. [177]

    Bingzhang Wang, Zhiyu Cai, Muhammad Monjurul Karim, Chenxi Liu, and Yinhai Wang. 2024. Traffic performance gpt (tp-gpt): Real-time data informed intelligent chatbot for transportation surveillance and management. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03076 (2024). J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, ...

    2024 arXiv

  172. [179]

    Hua Wei, Nan Xu, Huichu Zhang, Guanjie Zheng, Xinshi Zang, Chacha Chen, Weinan Zhang, Yanmin Zhu, Kai Xu, and Zhenhui Li. 2019. Colight: Learning network-level cooperation for traffic signal control. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and kn...

    2019

  173. [180]

    Maonan Wang, Aoyu Pang, Yuheng Kan, Man-On Pun, Chung Shue Chen, and Bo Huang. 2024. LLM-assisted light: Leveraging large language model capabilities for human-mimetic traffic signal control in complex urban environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08337 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  174. [181]

    Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems 35 (2022), 24824–24837

    2022

  175. [182]

    Xinlei Wang, Maike Feng, Jing Qiu, Jinjin Gu, and Junhua Zhao. 2024. From news to forecast: Integrating event analysis in llm-based time series forecasting with reflection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 58118–58153

    2024

  176. [183]

    Marco Wiering, Jelle Van Veenen, Jilles Vreeken, and Arne Koopman. 2004. Intelligent traffic light control. Institute of Information and Computing Sciences. Utrecht University (2004)

    2004

  177. [184]

    Yuqing Wang and Yun Zhao. 2024. TRAM: Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning for Large Language Models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 . 6389–6415

    2024

  178. [185]

    Zhilin Wang, Yu Ying Chiu, and Yu Cheung Chiu. 2023. Humanoid Agents: Platform for Simulating Human-like Generative Agents. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. 167–176

    2023

  179. [186]

    Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R Jennings. 1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice.The knowledge engineering review 10, 2 (1995), 115–152

    1995

  180. [187]

    Lixia Wu, Haomin Wen, Haoyuan Hu, Xiaowei Mao, Yutong Xia, Ergang Shan, Jianbin Zheng, Junhong Lou, Yuxuan Liang, Liuqing Yang, et al . 2024. LaDe: The First Comprehensive Last-mile Express Dataset from Industry. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Di...

    2024

  181. [188]

    Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M Dai, and Quoc V Le. 2021. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  182. [189]

    Zhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Xin Guo, Wei He, Yiwen Ding, Boyang Hong, Ming Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Senjie Jin, Enyu Zhou, et al . 2025. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. Science China Information Sciences 68, 2 (2025), 121101

    2025

  183. [190]

    Akila Wickramasekara, Frank Breitinger, and Mark Scanlon. 2025. Exploring the potential of large language models for improving digital forensic investigation efficiency. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 52 (2025), 301859

    2025

  184. [191]

    Yutong Xia, Ao Qu, Yunhan Zheng, Yihong Tang, Dingyi Zhuang, Yuxuan Liang, Cathy Wu, Roger Zimmermann, and Jinhua Zhao. 2025. Reimagining Urban Science: Scaling Causal Inference with Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12345 (2025). J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, Article...

    2025 arXiv

  185. [192]

    Marco A Wiering et al . 2000. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for traffic light control. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference (ICML’2000) . 1151–1158

    2000

  186. [193]

    Ross Williams, Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, Aritra Majumdar, and Navid Ghaffarzadegan. 2023. Epidemic modeling with generative agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04986 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  187. [194]

    Ronghui Xu, Hanyin Cheng, Chenjuan Guo, Hongfan Gao, Jilin Hu, Sean Bin Yang, and Bin Yang. 2025. Mm-path: Multi-modal, multi-granularity path representation learning. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V. 1 . 1703–1714

    2025

  188. [195]

    An Yan. 2021. Fairness-aware Spatio-temporal Prediction for Cities . University of Washington

    2021

  189. [196]

    Wenshan Wu, Shaoguang Mao, Yadong Zhang, Yan Xia, Li Dong, Lei Cui, and Furu Wei. 2024. Mind’s Eye of LLMs: Visualization-of-Thought Elicits Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    2024

  190. [197]

    Yibo Yan, Haomin Wen, Siru Zhong, Wei Chen, Haodong Chen, Qingsong Wen, Roger Zimmermann, and Yuxuan Liang. 2024. Urbanclip: Learning text-enhanced urban region profiling with contrastive language-image pretraining from the web. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 . ...

    2024

  191. [198]

    Yongqi Xia, Yi Huang, Qianqian Qiu, Xueying Zhang, Lizhi Miao, and Yixiang Chen. 2024. A question and answering service of typhoon disasters based on the t5 large language model. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 13, 5 (2024), 165

    2024

  192. [199]

    Jihan Yang, Shusheng Yang, Anjali W Gupta, Rilyn Han, Li Fei-Fei, and Saining Xie. 2024. Thinking in space: How multimodal large language models see, remember, and recall spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14171 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  193. [200]

    Congxi Xiao, Jingbo Zhou, Yixiong Xiao, Jizhou Huang, and Hui Xiong. 2024. ReFound: Crafting a Foundation Model for Urban Region Understanding upon Language and Visual Foundations. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 3527–3538

    2024

  194. [201]

    Fengli Xu, Jun Zhang, Chen Gao, Jie Feng, and Yong Li. 2023. Urban generative intelligence (ugi): A foundational platform for agents in embodied city environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11813 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  195. [202]

    Kun Yi, Jingru Fei, Qi Zhang, Hui He, Shufeng Hao, Defu Lian, and Wei Fan. 2024. Filternet: Harnessing frequency filters for time series forecasting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 55115–55140

    2024

  196. [203]

    Shukang Yin, Chaoyou Fu, Sirui Zhao, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. 2024. A survey on multimodal large language models. National Science Review 11, 12 (2024)

    2024

  197. [204]

    An Yan and Bill Howe. 2019. Fairst: Equitable spatial and temporal demand prediction for new mobility systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems . 552–555

    2019

  198. [205]

    Jia Yu, Jinxuan Wu, and Mohamed Sarwat. 2015. Geospark: A cluster computing framework for processing large-scale spatial data. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. 1–4

    2015

  199. [206]

    Yuwei Yan, Qingbin Zeng, Zhiheng Zheng, Jingzhe Yuan, Jie Feng, Jun Zhang, Fengli Xu, and Yong Li. 2024. OpenCity: A Scalable Platform to Simulate Urban Activities with Massive LLM Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21286 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  200. [207]

    Yuan Yuan, Jingtao Ding, Jie Feng, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2024. Unist: A prompt-empowered universal model for urban spatio-temporal prediction. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 4095–4106

    2024

  201. [208]

    Joshua C Yang, Damian Dalisan, Marcin Korecki, Carina I Hausladen, and Dirk Helbing. 2024. LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , Vol. 7. 1696–1708

    2024

  202. [209]

    Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Yongxin Tong. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 2 (2019), 1–19

    2019

  203. [210]

    Xianyuan Zhan, Haoran Xu, Yue Zhang, Xiangyu Zhu, Honglei Yin, and Yu Zheng. 2022. Deepthermal: Combustion optimization for thermal power generating units using offline reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 4680–4688

    2022

  204. [211]

    Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Dekang Qi. 2017. Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , Vol. 31

    2017

  205. [212]

    Dazhou Yu, Riyang Bao, Gengchen Mai, and Liang Zhao. 2025. Spatial-rag: Spatial retrieval augmented generation for real-world spatial reasoning questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18470 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  206. [213]

    Siyao Zhang, Daocheng Fu, Wenzhe Liang, Zhao Zhang, Bin Yu, Pinlong Cai, and Baozhen Yao. 2024. Trafficgpt: Viewing, processing and interacting with traffic foundation models. Transport Policy 150 (2024), 95–105

    2024

  207. [214]

    Chenhan Yuan, Qianqian Xie, Jimin Huang, and Sophia Ananiadou. 2024. Back to the future: Towards explainable temporal reasoning with large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 . 1963–1974

    2024

  208. [215]

    Weijia Zhang, Jindong Han, Zhao Xu, Hang Ni, Hao Liu, and Hui Xiong. 2024. Towards urban general intelligence: A review and outlook of urban foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01749 (2024). J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4, Article 111. Publication date: August 2018. Large Lan...

    2024

  209. [216]

    Zirui Yuan, Siqi Lai, and Hao Liu. 2025. CoLLMLight: Cooperative Large Language Model Agents for Network-Wide Traffic Signal Control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11739 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  210. [217]

    Xuehao Zhai, Junqi Jiang, Adam Dejl, Antonio Rago, Fangce Guo, Francesca Toni, and Aruna Sivakumar. 2025. Heterogeneous graph neural networks with post-hoc explanations for multi-modal and explainable land use inference. Information Fusion (2025), 103057

    2025

  211. [218]

    Yu Zheng. 2015. Trajectory data mining: an overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 6, 3 (2015), 1–41

    2015

  212. [219]

    Yu Zheng, Licia Capra, Ouri Wolfson, and Hai Yang. 2014. Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 5, 3 (2014), 1–55

    2014

  213. [220]

    Kuan Zhang, Jianbing Ni, Kan Yang, Xiaohui Liang, Ju Ren, and Xuemin Sherman Shen. 2017. Security and privacy in smart city applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE communications magazine 55, 1 (2017), 122–129

    2017

  214. [221]

    Yu Zheng, Yuming Lin, Liang Zhao, Tinghai Wu, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2023. Spatial planning of urban communities via deep reinforcement learning. Nature Computational Science 3, 9 (2023), 748–762

    2023

  215. [222]

    Weijia Zhang, Jindong Han, Hao Liu, Wei Fan, Hao Wang, and Hui Xiong. 2024. Meta-Transfer Learning Empowered Temporal Graph Networks for Cross-City Real Estate Appraisal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08947 (2024)

    2024

  216. [223]

    Yu Zheng, Longyi Liu, Yuming Lin, Jie Feng, Guozhen Zhang, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2025. UrbanPlanBench: A Comprehensive Assessment of Urban Planning Abilities in Large Language Models. https://openreview.net/forum? id=Dl5JaX7zoN

    2025

  217. [224]

    Weijia Zhang, Hao Liu, Jindong Han, Yong Ge, and Hui Xiong. 2022. Multi-agent graph convolutional reinforcement learning for dynamic electric vehicle charging pricing. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 2471–2481

    2022

  218. [225]

    Kaiqi Zhao, Yiding Liu, Quan Yuan, Lisi Chen, Zhida Chen, and Gao Cong. 2016. Towards personalized maps: mining user preferences from geo-textual data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 9, 13 (2016), 1545–1548

    2016

  219. [226]

    Baichuan Zhou, Haote Yang, Dairong Chen, Junyan Ye, Tianyi Bai, Jinhua Yu, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Conghui He, and Weijia Li. 2025. Urbench: A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large multimodal models in multi-view urban scenarios. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference...

    2025

  220. [227]

    Haoyi Zhou, Shanghang Zhang, Jieqi Peng, Shuai Zhang, Jianxin Li, Hui Xiong, and Wancai Zhang. 2021. Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 35. 11106–11115

    2021

  221. [228]

    Yu Zheng, Qianyue Hao, Jingwei Wang, Changzheng Gao, Jinwei Chen, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2024. A Survey of Machine Learning for Urban Decision Making: Applications in Planning, Transportation, and Healthcare. Comput. Surveys 57, 4 (2024), 1–41

    2024

  222. [230]

    Yu Zheng, Longyi Liu, Yuming Lin, Jie Feng, Guozhen Zhang, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. [n. d.]. UrbanPlanBench: A Comprehensive Assessment of Urban Planning Abilities in Large Language Models. ([n. d.])

  223. [231]

    Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2022. Rehearsal: learning from prediction to decision. Frontiers of Computer Science 16, 4 (2022), 164352

    2022

  224. [232]

    Yu Zheng, Tong Liu, Yilun Wang, Yanmin Zhu, Yanchi Liu, and Eric Chang. 2014. Diagnosing New York city’s noises with ubiquitous data. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 715–725

    2014

  225. [233]

    Siru Zhong, Weilin Ruan, Ming Jin, Huan Li, Qingsong Wen, and Yuxuan Liang. 2025. Time-VLM: Exploring Multimodal Vision-Language Models for Augmented Time Series Forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04395 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  226. [236]

    Yuchen Zhou, F Richard Yu, Jian Chen, and Yonghong Kuo. 2019. Cyber-physical-social systems: A state-of-the-art survey, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 22, 1 (2019), 389–425

    2019

  227. [238]

    Zihao Zhou and Rose Yu. 2024. Can LLMs Understand Time Series Anomalies?arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05440 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  228. [240]

    He Zhu, Wenjia Zhang, Nuoxian Huang, Boyang Li, Luyao Niu, Zipei Fan, Tianle Lun, Yicheng Tao, Junyou Su, Zhaoya Gong, et al. 2024. PlanGPT: Enhancing urban planning with tailored language model and efficient retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19273 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  229. [241]

    Xingchen Zou, Yibo Yan, Xixuan Hao, Yuehong Hu, Haomin Wen, Erdong Liu, Junbo Zhang, Yong Li, Tianrui Li, Yu Zheng, et al. 2025. Deep learning for cross-domain data fusion in urban computing: Taxonomy, advances, and outlook. Information Fusion 113 (2025), 102606. Received 20 F...

    2025

  230. [2015]

    In Geospatial informatics, fusion, and motion video analytics V, Vol

    Geomesa: a distributed architecture for spatio-temporal fusion. In Geospatial informatics, fusion, and motion video analytics V, Vol. 9473. SPIE, 128–140

  231. [2020]

    In 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)

    Just: Jd urban spatio-temporal data engine. In 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 1558–1569

    2020

  232. [2024]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10286 (2024)

    GPT-Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Intelligent Control for Vehicle Dispatching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10286 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  233. [2025]

    The Innovation 6, 1 (2025)

    Urban sensing in the era of large language models. The Innovation 6, 1 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.