Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Weyl-Superconductivity revealed by Edge Mode mediated Nonlocal Transport

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first observation of edge-mode-mediated nonlocal transport in the potential Weyl superconductor FeTe0.55Se0.45.

desk verdict A well-controlled, likely real observation of a non-local conductance plateau, but the chiral-edge interpretation rests on a contact geometry premise that the paper does not fully close. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01108 v1 pith:QTDYOOQF submitted 2025-07-01 cond-mat.supr-con

Wenyao Liu , Gabriel Natale , Camron Farhang , Michael Geiwitz , Kewen Huang , Qishuo Tan , Xingyao Guo , Mason Gray
show 19 more authors
Vincent Lamberti Jazzmin Victorin Huairuo Zhang James L. Hart Vsevolod Belosevich Xi Ling Qiong Ma Wan Kyu Park Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Judy J. Cha Albert V. Davydov Kin Chung Fong Ethan Arnault Genda Gu Rui-Xing Zhang Enrico Rossi Jing Xia Kenneth S. Burch
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords topologicalsuperconductivitychiralsuperconductoredgestatesnonlocaltransportiron-basedFeTe0.55Se0.45time-reversalsymmetrybreakingdifferentialconductanceplateauAndreevreflection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a bias-independent conductance plateau appearing only when two contacts sit on the same sharp crystalline edge of FeTe0.55Se0.45 is the long-sought transport signature of chiral topological superconductor edge states. The plateau disappears and becomes a zero-bias peak when the drain moves to the bulk, showing the transport is nonlocal and mediated by the edge rather than by local Andreev reflection. The signal is unaffected by magnetic fields up to 8 T, vanishes at the magnetic ordering temperature near 10 K rather than at the superconducting transition near 14.2 K, and is absent in topologically trivial FeTe0.4Se0.6 with similar superconducting and magnetic properties. If correct, this constitutes the first unambiguous demonstration of protected chiral edge transport in an iron-based superconductor and a new way to detect topological superconductivity.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the chiral topological superconductor edge state: a propagating, gapless channel along the side surface whose self-Hermitian property suppresses normal reflection and lets current enter, travel ballistically, and leave resonantly. The experiment's enabling tool is a contact geometry that reads this channel: argon-plasma etching that keeps the native oxide on the top surface while making ohmic contact to a preselected straight crystalline edge, so the measured differential conductance is dominated by the edge.

What would settle it

Measure the plateau in a device where the top surface is made deliberately conducting by removing the oxide while keeping the same edge-contact geometry; if the plateau persists unchanged, the claim that transport is edge-mediated is falsified. Alternatively, reproduce the double-edge-lead measurement on a topologically trivial FeTe0.4Se0.6 flake with identical plasma etching; a plateau there would show the signal is an etching artifact rather than a topological signature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that resonant charge injection, ballistic propagation, and extraction through the edge modes of a Weyl-superconducting phase produce a distinctive nonlocal conductance plateau in FeTe0.55Se0.45. The plateau appears only in the double-edge-lead configuration on topologically nontrivial samples; switching the drain to the surface turns it into a zero-bias conductance peak, and placing both source and drain on the surface yields ordinary Andreev double-peak spectra. Its height scales roughly with flake thickness, consistent with multiple edge channels, and its temperature dependence tracks the spontaneous magnetization rather than the superconducting gap. The authors present this correlation, together with device reproducibility, absence in trivial samples, and insensitivity to 8 T fields, as evidence that the plateau is carried by topologically protected edge states rather than by Andreev bound states, helical hinge modes, or heating artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

The experiment assumes the plasma-etched contacts are electrically dominated by the cleaved crystalline edge, with the native oxide blocking top-surface injection; if that oxide conducts or the etched near-surface region has altered superconducting properties, the configuration-dependent plateau could arise from non-topological effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The plateau can serve as a routine transport diagnostic for chiral topological superconductor edge states in FeTe0.55Se0.45 and related iron-based superconductors.
  • Because the signal survives source-drain separations of 5 micrometers, more than a thousand times the coherence length, edge-mediated nonlocal transport could route current through protected channels in future devices.
  • The correlation with magnetization implies the edge states exist only in the time-reversal-symmetry-broken phase, so superconductivity alone does not guarantee the protected transport signature.
  • A quantitative model of the multi-channel, three-dimensional plateau remains to be built; the experiment constrains such models by tying plateau width to magnetization and plateau height to flake thickness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A clean test of the edge-mediation claim would be to measure the same device before and after deliberately removing the top oxide; if the plateau persists with a fully conducting top surface, the interpretation in terms of exclusive edge injection would be harder to maintain.
  • The near-linear growth of plateau height with flake thickness suggests a stacked-layer picture in which each superconducting layer adds a transport channel; thinning the flake and tracking the plateau height could test this directly.
  • If the edge modes are Majorana in nature, the same geometry should also show quantized thermal conductance, a measurable prediction the paper does not make.
  • The same double-edge-lead geometry could be applied to other candidate chiral superconductors to look for a plateau with the same magnetic-field and temperature robustness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports differential-conductance measurements on FeTe0.55Se0.45 flakes with contacts placed on cleaved crystalline edges. It claims the first observation of protected, non-local transport mediated by chiral topological superconductor (C-TSC) edge modes emerging from a potential Weyl-superconducting state. The central signature is a bias-independent conductance plateau in the double-edge-lead configuration, which switches to a zero-bias conductance peak when the drain is moved to the bulk and to ordinary Andreev double-peak spectra when the source is on the top surface. The plateau is reported to be insensitive to magnetic fields up to 8 T, to vanish near the magnetization temperature TKerr ≈ 10 K rather than Tc ≈ 14.2 K, to scale with flake thickness, and to be absent in topologically trivial Fe(Te,Se) controls. The authors propose a device design in which a native oxide blocks top-surface injection so that current enters through the cleaved edge.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, this is a landmark result: the first unambiguous transport demonstration of chiral topological superconductor edge states in an iron-based superconductor, with a non-local, field-robust signature that goes beyond previous point-contact zero-bias anomalies. The paper's internal controls are substantial: the same device switches between plateau, ZBCP, and Andreev double-peak configurations; the plateau is reproduced in multiple devices and laboratories; trivial-composition samples with similar Tc and magnetization do not show the plateau; and the temperature dependence tracks the Kerr signal rather than Tc. These controls make the observation unlikely to be a generic contact artifact, and the authors are appropriately cautious in calling the material a 'potential Weyl superconductor.' However, the central claim rests on two premises that are not quantitatively established: the electrical exclusivity of the edge contacts and the transfer of 2D single-mode C-TSC theory to the 3D multi-channel device. The paper would need additional experimental or theoretical support before the claim can be accepted as definitive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Device Design, Fig. 1d] The premise that current enters primarily through the cleaved edge is not quantitatively demonstrated. The text states that 'the top oxide enables transport primarily into the side' and supports this with a cross-sectional STEM image, but the same devices' top-surface contacts (GSur) show ordinary Andreev reflection with normal-state resistances similar to the edge contacts, implying the top path is electrically active. If the Ar-plasma etch creates a normal or weakly superconducting shell along the cleaved edge, two contacts on that shared shell could produce a low-bias conductance plateau that disappears when the drain is moved to the bulk, which would be a local contact effect rather than a chiral-edge signature. The trivial-composition controls do not fully resolve this unless identical etch and oxide properties are demonstrated across compositions. A quantitative injection test, such as comparing edge vs top contact resistances in the normal state or using a geometry that isolates edge current, should be provided.
  2. [Non-Local Response] The authors concede that 'a fully quantitative description of the plateau from C-TSC edge states exceeds the scope of previous single-mode models.' Because the central claim is that the plateau is the specific signature of 3D multi-channel C-TSC edge modes, the paper should provide a quantitative model or a concrete falsifiable prediction that distinguishes the proposed mechanism from a plasma-damaged edge shell or multi-channel Andreev processes. Without such a calculation, the observed combination of bias independence, thickness scaling, and field insensitivity is not uniquely tied to a chiral topological state. A transport calculation for a 3D multi-channel chiral edge, even a minimal lattice model, or a predicted quantized or stepped conductance would materially strengthen the identification.
  3. [Temperature Evolution and Magnetic Order, Fig. 3] The temperature argument for topological protection is not fully controlled. The plateau width is approximately ±0.4 mV, so by T ≈ 10 K the thermal energy (≈0.86 meV) already exceeds the feature width; a non-topological narrow conductance feature would also be thermally washed out near 10 K. The correlation with the Kerr signal is suggestive, but to conclude that the plateau is 'protected from thermal smearing' unless magnetic order is suppressed, the authors should compare the observed temperature broadening to an explicit model of the edge-plateau lineshape at finite temperature, and ideally to a trivial narrow-feature control with the same width.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The first paragraph contains a typo: 'An promising approach' should read 'A promising approach.'
  2. [Non-Local Response and Fig. 2] The notation Gij,mn is introduced, but the main text does not clearly state the sign convention and which indices correspond to current versus voltage leads; please define this explicitly in the main text and in the Fig. 2 caption.
  3. [Non-Local Response] The sentence 'the ZBCP is not entirely understood may be explained by several mechanisms... such as Andreev edge states (AES)' is grammatically incomplete, and the abbreviation AES is not defined; please revise and define all abbreviations.
  4. [Discussion and Outlook] The abstract claims 'first observation of protected, non-local transport,' while the Discussion claims 'first unambiguous, long-sought evidence of C-TSC edge states'; harmonize these claims given the prior reports of helical hinge zero modes cited in Ref. 48.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the plateau is a new measurement, the theory predictions are independent, and the cited TRSB/topology inputs are externally falsifiable; the paper's own 3D-theory caveat is a limitation, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central claim—the configuration-dependent conductance plateau—is an original transport measurement with explicit controls: same-device switching between double-edge, single-edge, and surface-lead geometries; topologically trivial FeTe0.4Se0.6 devices; and temperature, magnetic-field, and reproducibility checks. The theoretical expectations (resonant injection/extraction, non-local drain sensitivity, plateau width set by the exchange gap rather than the superconducting gap, and field insensitivity) are taken from independent model calculations (refs 13–16, 29, 30, 42) and were not fitted to the data. The input premises—topological band structure and time-reversal symmetry breaking—are imported from prior experiments, including some from this collaboration (refs 35, 36, 41), but those are externally falsifiable measurements/theoretical results and are corroborated by independent muSR/SMOKE work (ref 38) and by the paper's own Kerr data on the same flakes; they are not defined in terms of the plateau. The paper explicitly concedes that 'a fully quantitative description of the plateau from C-TSC edge states exceeds the scope of previous single-mode models,' which is an honest limitation on quantitative uniqueness, not a circular reuse of the conclusion. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no equation-level reduction is present. The same-group citations raise a provenance note but not a circularity score under the stated rules, because they constitute real independent evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim imports three ingredients from prior work (topological band structure, TRSB and magnetization, and the 2D C-TSC transport theory) rather than deriving them anew, which is normal for an experimental paper but means the report stands on these imports. No new entities are postulated. One hand-chosen energy scale appears only in the counterfactual BTK comparison. The load-bearing experimental assumption, that the plasma-etched contacts are edge-dominated, is structural and is the most fragile entry.

free parameters (1)
  • BTK counterfactual energy scale Δ = ≈ 0.4 meV (hand-chosen, from ref 53; not fitted to the plateau)
    Used in the thermal-smearing comparison (Fig. S3) to show that a trivial Andreev plateau with this energy scale would broaden below 5 K, unlike the observed plateau. It is a counterfactual input, not a fitted parameter of the central claim.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption FeTe0.55Se0.45 has a topologically non-trivial band structure (band inversion) in the normal state
    Inherited from ARPES and band-structure work (refs 31-34). The topological ingredient of the claimed C-TSC state rests on this prior result and is not re-measured here.
  • domain assumption Bulk time-reversal symmetry breaking (spontaneous magnetization) coexists with superconductivity below TKerr ≈ 10 K
    Based on the SMOKE data shown in Fig. 1f and 3c plus prior SMOKE and µSR results (refs 35-38), partly from the authors' own groups. The coexistence is the second ingredient of the C-TSC interpretation.
  • domain assumption The theoretical predictions for 2D chiral TSC edge-mode non-local transport (refs 14-16) extend to this 3D multi-channel device
    The plateau, its drain-position dependence, and its robustness are interpreted using 2D single-mode models. The authors state in the Discussion that 'the current theoretical models must be extended to multiple edge-states or 3D C-TSC systems,' so the quantitative connection is unverified.
  • domain assumption Plasma-etched contacts are electrically dominated by the cleaved crystalline edge, with the native oxide blocking the top surface
    Cross-section STEM (Fig. 1d) shows the electrode floated on the oxide; the claim that transport is 'primarily into the side' is load-bearing for the edge-state interpretation but cannot be directly confirmed by transport alone.
  • standard math The BTK model describes the local Andreev baseline (GSur)
    Used to interpret the surface-lead spectra and the thermal-smearing comparison (Fig. 3b and Fig. S3). Standard single-barrier Andreev reflection model, appropriate but simplified for a multi-band superconductor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Weyl-Superconductivity revealed by Edge Mode mediated Nonlocal Transport." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QTDYOOQF

@misc{pith2026250701108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Weyl-Superconductivity revealed by Edge Mode mediated Nonlocal Transport},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QTDYOOQF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01108}
}
read the original abstract

Topological superconductivity (TSC) hosts exotic modes enabling error-free quantum computation and low-temperature spintronics. Despite preliminary evidence of edge modes, unambiguous signatures remain undetected. Here, we report the first observation of protected, non-local transport from the edge modes of the potential Weyl-superconductor \ch{FeTe_{0.55}Se_{0.45}}. Namely resonant charge injection, ballistic transport, and extraction via edge modes. An anomalous conductance plateau emerges only when topological, superconducting, and magnetic phases coexist, with source-drain contacts coupled via the edge. Moving the drain to the bulk switches the non-local transport process to a local Andreev process, generating a zero-bias conductance peak (ZBCP). The edge mode's topological protection is confirmed by its insensitivity to external magnetic fields and increasing temperatures until the spontaneous magnetization is substantially suppressed. Our findings provide a new methodology to demonstrate TSC edge states in \ch{FeTe_{0.55}Se_{0.45}} via topologically protected non-local transport.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01108 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Non-local charge transport mediated by TSC edge states. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Configuration dependent conductance spectra in Topological Fe(Te,Se). a-c, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temperature evolution. a, False-colour map of the GDE temperature evolution vs V spectra for the non-local conductance plateau. Three regimes are observed: GDE is temperature independent for T < 5K, the plateau width slowly shrinks for 5K < T < 10K, and the remaining features diminish rapidly above 10 K. b, False-colour map of the GSur temperature evolution vs V spectra, consistent with local AR process. c, The θk c… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Response to external magnetic field. a, GDE measurements taken with a magnetic field applied along different directions of the FeTe0.55Se0.45 flake at 1.4 K. Going from the upper to lower panels, the direction of the applied magnetic field is aligned out-of-plane, in-p…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Green, D

    Read, N. & Green, D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect.Physical Review B 61, 10267 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Mackenzie, A. P. & Maeno, Y . The superconductivity of sr 2 ruo 4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing. Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 657 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    & Kane, C

    Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Physical review letters 100, 096407 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    & Zhang, S.-C

    Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Chiral p-wave order in sr2ruo4

    Kallin, C. Chiral p-wave order in sr2ruo4. Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 042501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    & Robinson, J

    Linder, J. & Robinson, J. W. Superconducting spintronics. Nature Physics 11, 307–315 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    & Han, W

    Cai, R., Žuti ´c, I. & Han, W. Superconductor/ferromagnet heterostructures: a platform for superconducting spintronics and quantum computation. Advanced Quantum Technologies 6, 2200080 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Amet, F. et al. Supercurrent in the quantum hall regime. Science 352, 966–969 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Lee, G.-H. et al. Inducing superconducting correlation in quantum hall edge states. Nature Physics 13, 693–698 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Zhao, L. et al. Interference of chiral andreev edge states. Nature Physics 16, 862–867 (2020). 16

    2020

  3. [11]

    I., Burch, K

    Choi, E.-M., Sim, K. I., Burch, K. S. & Lee, Y . H. Emergent multifunctional magnetic proximity in van der waals layered heterostructures. Advanced Science 9, 2200186 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Hatefipour, M. et al. Induced Superconducting Pairing in Integer Quantum Hall Edge States. Nano Letters 22, 6173–6178 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    & Beenakker, C

    Serban, I., Béri, B., Akhmerov, A. & Beenakker, C. Domain wall in a chiral p-wave super- conductor: A pathway for electrical current. Physical review letters 104, 147001 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    He, J. J. et al. Correlated spin currents generated by resonant-crossed andreev reflections in topological superconductors. Nature communications 5, 3232 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    & Sun, Q.-F

    Zhang, Y .-T., Hou, Z., Xie, X. & Sun, Q.-F. Quantum perfect crossed andreev reflection in top-gated quantum anomalous hall insulator–superconductor junctions. Physical Review B 95, 245433 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    & Manske, D

    Ikegaya, S., Asano, Y . & Manske, D. Anomalous nonlocal conductance as a fingerprint of chiral majorana edge states. Physical Review Letters 123, 207002 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    H., Stern, A., Freedman, M

    Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M. & Sarma, S. D. Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    M., Sau, J

    Lutchyn, R. M., Sau, J. D. & Sarma, S. D. Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures. Physical review letters 105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems.Reports on progress in physics 75, 076501 (2012)

    Alicea, J. New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems.Reports on progress in physics 75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Mong, R. S. et al. Universal topological quantum computation from a superconductor- abelian quantum hall heterostructure. Physical Review X 4, 011036 (2014). 17

    2014

  13. [21]

    Albrecht, S. M. et al. Exponential protection of zero modes in majorana islands. Nature 531, 206–209 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Yazdani, A., von Oppen, F., Halperin, B. I. & Yacoby, A. Hunting for majoranas. Science 380, eade0850 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Vignaud, H. et al. Evidence for chiral supercurrent in quantum Hall Josephson junctions. Nature 1–6 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Yi, H. et al. Interface-induced superconductivity in magnetic topological insulators. Sci- ence 383, 634–639 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Kayyalha, M. et al. Absence of evidence for chiral majorana modes in quantum anomalous hall-superconductor devices. Science 367, 64–67 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Sarma, S. D. & Pan, H. Disorder-induced zero-bias peaks in majorana nanowires. Physical Review B 103, 195158 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Hui, H.-Y ., Sau, J. D. & Sarma, S. D. Bulk disorder in the superconductor affects proximity- induced topological superconductivity. Physical Review B 92, 174512 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    & Balents, L

    Meng, T. & Balents, L. Weyl superconductors. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 054504 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Sau, J. D. & Tewari, S. Topologically protected surface majorana arcs and bulk weyl fermions in ferromagnetic superconductors. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 104509 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    B., Liu, C

    Wu, X., Chung, S. B., Liu, C. & Kim, E.-A. Topological orders competing for the dirac surface state in fesete surfaces. Physical Review Research 3, 013066 (2021). 18

    2021

  23. [31]

    Wang, Z. et al. Topological nature of the fese 0.5 te 0.5 superconductor. Physical Review B 92, 115119 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Zhang, P. et al. Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron- based superconductor. Science 360, 182–186 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of fe1+ y te1- x se x.Nature Materials 20, 1221–1227 (2021)

    Li, Y .et al. Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of fe1+ y te1- x se x.Nature Materials 20, 1221–1227 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Lohani, H. et al. Band inversion and topology of the bulk electronic structure in fese0.45te0.55. Physical Review B 101, 245146 (2020). 1910.01128

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    McLaughlin, N. J. et al. Strong correlation between superconductivity and ferromagnetism in an fe-chalcogenide superconductor. Nano Letters 21, 7277–7283 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Farhang, C. et al. Revealing the origin of time-reversal symmetry breaking in fe- chalcogenide superconductor fete 1- x se x. Physical Review Letters 130, 046702 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    & Johnson, P

    Zaki, N., Gu, G., Tsvelik, A., Wu, C. & Johnson, P. D. Time-reversal symmetry breaking in the fe-chalcogenide superconductors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2007241118 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Roppongi, M. et al. Topology meets time-reversal symmetry breaking in fese _{1 − x} te _{x} superconductor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02818 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Daghero, D. et al. Strong-coupling d-wave superconductivity in pucoga5 probed by point- contact spectroscopy. Nature communications 3, 786 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Matsuura, K. et al. Two superconducting states with broken time-reversal symmetry in fese1- x s x. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2208276120 (2023). 19

    2023

  33. [41]

    & Zhang, R.-X

    Hu, L.-H. & Zhang, R.-X. Dislocation majorana bound states in iron-based superconduc- tors. Nature Communications 15, 2337 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    T., Lee, P

    Law, K. T., Lee, P. A. & Ng, T. K. Majorana fermion induced resonant andreev reflection. Physical review letters 103, 237001 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Park, W. et al. Strong coupling superconductivity in iron-chalcogenide fete0.55se0.45. arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.0190 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    & Morpurgo, A

    Russo, S., Kroug, M., Klapwijk, T. & Morpurgo, A. Experimental observation of bias- dependent nonlocal andreev reflection. Physical review letters 95, 027002 (2005)

    2005

  37. [45]

    & Chandrasekhar, V

    Cadden-Zimansky, P. & Chandrasekhar, V . Nonlocal correlations in normal-metal super- conducting systems. Physical review letters 97, 237003 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    P., Brataas, A

    Morten, J. P., Brataas, A. & Belzig, W. Circuit theory of crossed andreev reflection. Physi- cal Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 74, 214510 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    Tang, F. et al. Quasi-2d superconductivity in fete0. 55se0. 45 ultrathin film. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 265702 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Gray, M. J. et al. Evidence for helical hinge zero modes in an fe-based superconductor. Nano letters 19, 4890–4896 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Zalic, A. et al. Fete 0.55 se 0.45 van der waals tunneling devices. Physical Review B 100, 064517 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Wang, D. et al. Evidence for majorana bound states in an iron-based superconductor. Science 362, 333–335 (2018). 20

    2018

  43. [51]

    Galluzzi, A. et al. Transport properties and high upper critical field of a fe (se, te) iron based superconductor. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 228, 725–731 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    & Herrera, W

    Casas-Barrera, O., Gómez Páez, S. & Herrera, W. J. Long-range cooper pair splitting by chiral majorana edge states. Physical Review B 110, 045415 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Lee, S. et al. Perfect andreev reflection due to the klein paradox in a topological supercon- ducting state. Nature 570, 344–348 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Gifford, J. et al. Zero bias anomaly in andreev reflection spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Physics 120 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Argyres, P. N. Theory of the Faraday and Kerr Effects in Ferromagnetics. Phys. Rev. 97, 334–345 (1955). Publisher: American Physical Society

    1955

  48. [56]

    & Kashiwaya, S

    Tanaka, Y ., Tanuma, Y ., Kuroki, K. & Kashiwaya, S. Doppler shift of zero energy andreev bound state. Physica B: Condensed Matter 329, 1444–1445 (2003)

    2003

  49. [57]

    Zareapour, P. et al. Andreev reflection without Fermi surface alignment in high-T c van der Waals heterostructures. New Journal of Physics 19, 043026 (2017). 1705.03518

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Mascot, E. et al. Topological surface superconductivity in fese0. 45te0. 55. Communica- tions Physics 5, 188 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Kim, M., Choi, S., Brito, W. H. & Kotliar, G. Orbital-Selective Mott Transition Effects and Nontrivial Topology of Iron Chalcogenide. Physical Review Letters 132, 136504 (2024). 2304.05002

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    G., Häussler, R

    Naidyuk, Y . G., Häussler, R. & Löhneysen, H. Magnetic field dependence of the andreev reflection structure in the conductivity of sn point contacts. Physica B: Condensed Matter 218, 122–125 (1996). 21 Acknowledgments We thank Fan Zhang, Ilija Zeljkovic, Ziqiang Wang, and Jiga...

    1996

  53. [2539]

    and V .L

    G.N. and V .L. are grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) EPMD program via grant EPMD-2211334. The AFSOR, Grant FA9550-20-1-0282, supported the work of K.S.B.. Transport measurements at Boston College were enabled by equipment pro- vided through AFOS...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.