pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.01415 · v4 · submitted 2025-07-02 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.NA· math.NA

Randomized subspace correction methods for convex optimization

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.NAmath.NA
keywords randomized subspace correctionconvex optimizationdomain decompositionmultigridblock coordinate descentconvergence analysisspace decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

An abstract framework unifies randomized subspace correction methods for convex optimization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents an abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods applied to convex optimization problems. It unifies various existing algorithms such as domain decomposition, multigrid, and block coordinate descent into a single structure. The framework delivers convergence rate analysis that starts with minimal assumptions and extends to practical cases involving sharpness and strong convexity. A sympathetic reader would care because the results apply to general space decompositions and inexact local solvers, making it relevant for solving problems in nonlinear partial differential equations, imaging, and data science.

Core claim

The central claim is that an abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods unifies and generalizes a broad class of algorithms for convex optimization, including domain decomposition, multigrid, and block coordinate descent. The framework provides convergence rate analysis ranging from minimal assumptions to settings with sharpness and strong convexity, while extending to arbitrary space decompositions, inexact local solvers, and weaker smoothness or convexity assumptions.

What carries the argument

The abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods, which unifies convergence analysis across general space decompositions in convex optimization.

If this is right

  • Convergence rates apply to block coordinate descent with both overlapping and non-overlapping blocks.
  • Inexact local solvers are permitted while preserving global convergence guarantees.
  • Rates hold for convex problems satisfying a sharpness condition even without strong convexity.
  • The same analysis covers applications to nonlinear PDEs and imaging with arbitrary decompositions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework may allow reduction of new algorithm variants to the abstract setting for quicker convergence proofs.
  • Randomization probabilities could be tuned using the subspace properties identified in the analysis.
  • Similar unification might extend the approach to deterministic or distributed optimization methods.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis requires that the space admits a decomposition into subspaces selected with positive probability and that local corrections achieve sufficient reduction in the objective function.

What would settle it

A concrete convex optimization problem with a given space decomposition where the randomized subspace correction method fails to achieve the predicted convergence rate under the stated minimal assumptions.

read the original abstract

This paper introduces an abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods for convex optimization, which unifies and generalizes a broad class of existing algorithms, including domain decomposition, multigrid, and block coordinate descent methods. We provide a convergence rate analysis ranging from minimal assumptions to more practical settings, such as sharpness and strong convexity. While most existing studies on block coordinate descent methods focus on nonoverlapping decompositions and smooth or strongly convex problems, our framework extends to more general settings involving arbitrary space decompositions, inexact local solvers, and problems with weaker smoothness or convexity assumptions. The proposed framework is broadly applicable to convex optimization problems arising in areas such as nonlinear partial differential equations, imaging, and data science.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods for convex optimization. It unifies and generalizes a broad class of existing algorithms including domain decomposition, multigrid, and block coordinate descent. The framework supplies convergence rate analysis ranging from minimal assumptions on convexity and smoothness to stronger settings such as sharpness and strong convexity, while accommodating arbitrary space decompositions, inexact local solvers, and weaker problem assumptions.

Significance. If the stated convergence results hold, the work supplies a unified theoretical lens for a wide family of subspace correction schemes. Explicit tracking of the finite decomposition constant in the proofs, together with correct reduction to known rates for block coordinate descent, domain decomposition, and multigrid under appropriate specialization, constitutes a clear strength. The extension to inexact solvers and arbitrary decompositions broadens applicability to nonlinear PDEs, imaging, and data science.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract asserts convergence under 'minimal assumptions'; the introduction or the statement of the main theorems should list the precise conditions (e.g., on the decomposition constant and local solver accuracy) so that readers can immediately verify the scope.
  2. A dedicated subsection or corollary that recovers the classical block-coordinate-descent rate as a special case would strengthen the unification claim and make the dependence on the decomposition constant fully transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The summary accurately captures the contributions of the abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in abstract framework or convergence analysis

full rationale

The paper develops an abstract framework for randomized subspace correction methods in convex optimization, deriving convergence rates from minimal assumptions on convexity, smoothness, and space decompositions. Central theorems explicitly track the finite decomposition constant and recover known rates for block coordinate descent, domain decomposition, and multigrid upon specialization, without any reduction of results to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or unverified self-citations by construction. The analysis is self-contained against standard convex optimization benchmarks and does not rely on load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the framework appears to rest on standard domain assumptions for convex optimization and subspace decompositions without introducing new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions on convex optimization problems and space decompositions allow convergence analysis
    Invoked to support the claimed analysis ranging from minimal assumptions to sharpness and strong convexity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1162 out tokens · 54289 ms · 2026-05-19T06:54:06.435199+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Badea, Convergence rate of a Schwarz multilevel method for the constrained minimization of nonquadratic functionals , SIAM J

    L. Badea, Convergence rate of a Schwarz multilevel method for the constrained minimization of nonquadratic functionals , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 44 (2006), pp. 449–477

  2. [2]

    Badea and R

    L. Badea and R. Krause , One-and two-level Schwarz methods for variational inequalities of the second kind and their application to frictional contact , Numer. Math., 120 (2012), pp. 573–599

  3. [3]

    Badea, X.-C

    L. Badea, X.-C. Tai, and J. Wang , Convergence rate analysis of a multiplicative Schwarz method for variational inequalities , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 41 (2003), pp. 1052–1073

  4. [4]

    H. H. Bauschke and P. L. Combettes , Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces, Springer, New York, 2011

  5. [5]

    Beck, On the convergence of alternating minimization for convex programming with appli- cations to iteratively reweighted least squares and decomposition schemes, SIAM J

    A. Beck, On the convergence of alternating minimization for convex programming with appli- cations to iteratively reweighted least squares and decomposition schemes, SIAM J. Optim., 25 (2015), pp. 185–209

  6. [6]

    Beck and L

    A. Beck and L. Tetruashvili , On the convergence of block coordinate descent type methods , SIAM J. Optim., 23 (2013), pp. 2037–2060

  7. [7]

    D. P. Bertsekas , Incremental proximal methods for large scale convex optimization , Math. Program., 129 (2011), pp. 163–195

  8. [8]

    Bolte, A

    J. Bolte, A. Daniilidis, and A. Lewis, The Lojasiewicz inequality for nonsmooth subanalytic functions with applications to subgradient dynamical systems , SIAM J. Optim., 17 (2007), pp. 1205–1223

  9. [9]

    S. C. Brenner , An additive analysis of multiplicative Schwarz methods , Numer. Math., 123 (2013), pp. 1–19

  10. [10]

    Bueler and P

    E. Bueler and P. E. Farrell , A full approximation scheme multilevel method for nonlinear variational inequalities, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 46 (2024), pp. A2421–A2444

  11. [11]

    Carstensen, Domain decomposition for a non-smooth convex minimization problem and its application to plasticity , Numer

    C. Carstensen, Domain decomposition for a non-smooth convex minimization problem and its application to plasticity , Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 4 (1997), pp. 177–190

  12. [12]

    Chambolle and T

    A. Chambolle and T. Pock , An introduction to continuous optimization for imaging , Acta Numer., 25 (2016), pp. 161–319

  13. [13]

    Chang, X.-C

    H. Chang, X.-C. Tai, L.-L. Wang, and D. Yang , Convergence rate of overlapping domain decomposition methods for the Rudin–Osher–Fatemi model based on a dual formulation , SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 8 (2015), pp. 564–591

  14. [14]

    L. Chen, X. Hu, and S. Wise , Convergence analysis of the fast subspace descent method for convex optimization problems, Math. Comp., 89 (2020), pp. 2249–2282

  15. [15]

    Chorobura and I

    F. Chorobura and I. Necoara , Random coordinate descent methods for nonseparable com- posite optimization, SIAM J. Optim., 33 (2023), pp. 2160–2190. 20 BOOU JIANG, JONGHO PARK, AND JINCHAO XU

  16. [16]

    C. D. Dang and G. Lan, Stochastic block mirror descent methods for nonsmooth and stochastic optimization, SIAM J. Optim., 25 (2015), pp. 856–881

  17. [17]

    Fercoq and P

    O. Fercoq and P. Richt ´arik, Accelerated, parallel, and proximal coordinate descent, SIAM J. Optim., 25 (2015), pp. 1997–2023

  18. [18]

    T. Gao, S. Lu, J. Liu, and C. Chu , Randomized Bregman coordinate descent methods for non-Lipschitz optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05202, (2020)

  19. [19]

    Griebel and P

    M. Griebel and P. Oswald , Greedy and randomized versions of the multiplicative Schwarz method, Linear Algebra Appl., 437 (2012), pp. 1596–1610

  20. [20]

    Hinterm¨uller and A

    M. Hinterm¨uller and A. Langer , Non-overlapping domain decomposition methods for dual total variation based image denoising , J. Sci. Comput., 62 (2015), pp. 456–481

  21. [21]

    M. Hong, X. Wang, M. Razaviyayn, and Z.-Q. Luo , Iteration complexity analysis of block coordinate descent methods, Math. Program., 163 (2017), pp. 85–114

  22. [22]

    X. Hu, J. Xu, and L. T. Zikatanov , Randomized and fault-tolerant method of subspace cor- rections, Res. Math. Sci., 6 (2019), pp. 1–15

  23. [23]

    Hua and N

    X. Hua and N. Yamashita, Block coordinate proximal gradient methods with variable Bregman functions for nonsmooth separable optimization , Math. Program., 160 (2016), pp. 1–32

  24. [24]

    Jiang, J

    B. Jiang, J. Park, and J. Xu , Connections between convex optimization algorithms and subspace correction methods, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09765, (2025)

  25. [25]

    Kunisch and M

    K. Kunisch and M. Hinterm ¨uller, Total bounded variation regularization as a bilaterally constrained optimization problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), pp. 1311–1333

  26. [26]

    Lee and C

    C.-O. Lee and C. Nam , Primal domain decomposition methods for the total variation mini- mization, based on dual decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 39 (2017), pp. B403–B423

  27. [27]

    Lee, E.-H

    C.-O. Lee, E.-H. Park, and J. Park , A finite element approach for the dual Rudin–Osher– Fatemi model and its nonoverlapping domain decomposition methods , SIAM J. Sci. Com- put., 41 (2019), pp. B205–B228

  28. [28]

    Lee and J

    C.-O. Lee and J. Park, Fast nonoverlapping block Jacobi method for the dual Rudin–Osher– Fatemi model, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 12 (2019), pp. 2009–2034

  29. [29]

    Lee and J

    Y.-J. Lee and J. Park , On the linear convergence of additive Schwarz methods for the p- Laplacian, IMA J. Numer. Anal., (2024), p. drae068, https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/ drae068

  30. [30]

    Lee and J

    Y.-J. Lee and J. Park, Subspace correction methods for semicoercive and nearly semicoercive convex optimization with applications to nonlinear PDEs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17318, (2024)

  31. [31]

    Q. Lin, Z. Lu, and L. Xiao , An accelerated randomized proximal coordinate gradient method and its application to regularized empirical risk minimization , SIAM J. Optim., 25 (2015), pp. 2244–2273

  32. [32]

    Lu and L

    Z. Lu and L. Xiao, On the complexity analysis of randomized block-coordinate descent methods, Math. Program., 152 (2015), pp. 615–642

  33. [33]

    Necoara and D

    I. Necoara and D. Clipici , Parallel random coordinate descent method for composite mini- mization: Convergence analysis and error bounds, SIAM J. Optim., 26 (2016), pp. 197–226

  34. [34]

    Nesterov, Efficiency of coordinate descent methods on huge-scale optimization problems , SIAM J

    Y. Nesterov, Efficiency of coordinate descent methods on huge-scale optimization problems , SIAM J. Optim., 22 (2012), pp. 341–362

  35. [35]

    Nesterov, Gradient methods for minimizing composite functions , Math

    Y. Nesterov, Gradient methods for minimizing composite functions , Math. Program., 140 (2013), pp. 125–161

  36. [36]

    Nesterov, Universal gradient methods for convex optimization problems , Math

    Y. Nesterov, Universal gradient methods for convex optimization problems , Math. Program., 152 (2015), pp. 381–404

  37. [37]

    Park, Additive Schwarz methods for convex optimization as gradient methods , SIAM J

    J. Park, Additive Schwarz methods for convex optimization as gradient methods , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 58 (2020), pp. 1495–1530

  38. [38]

    Park, Pseudo-linear convergence of an additive Schwarz method for dual total variation minimization, Electron

    J. Park, Pseudo-linear convergence of an additive Schwarz method for dual total variation minimization, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 54 (2021), pp. 176–197

  39. [39]

    Park, Fast gradient methods for uniformly convex and weakly smooth problems , Adv

    J. Park, Fast gradient methods for uniformly convex and weakly smooth problems , Adv. Com- put. Math., 48 (2022), p. Paper No. 34

  40. [40]

    Park, Additive Schwarz methods for fourth-order variational inequalities , J

    J. Park, Additive Schwarz methods for fourth-order variational inequalities , J. Sci. Comput., 101 (2024), p. Paper No. 74

  41. [41]

    Park, Additive Schwarz methods for semilinear elliptic problems with convex energy func- tionals: Convergence rate independent of nonlinearity , SIAM J

    J. Park, Additive Schwarz methods for semilinear elliptic problems with convex energy func- tionals: Convergence rate independent of nonlinearity , SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 46 (2024), pp. A1373–A1396

  42. [42]

    Park, Two-level overlapping Schwarz preconditioners with universal coarse spaces for 2mth- order elliptic problems , SIAM J

    J. Park, Two-level overlapping Schwarz preconditioners with universal coarse spaces for 2mth- order elliptic problems , SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 46 (2024), pp. A3681–A3702

  43. [43]

    Park and J

    J. Park and J. Xu , Theory of parallel subspace correction methods for smooth convex op- timization. Submitted to Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXVIII. RANDOMIZED SUBSPACE CORRECTION METHODS 21

  44. [44]

    Qu and P

    Z. Qu and P. Richt ´arik, Coordinate descent with arbitrary sampling I: Algorithms and com- plexity, Optim. Methods Softw., 31 (2014), pp. 829–857

  45. [45]

    Razaviyayn, M

    M. Razaviyayn, M. Hong, and Z.-Q. Luo, A unified convergence analysis of block successive minimization methods for nonsmooth optimization , SIAM J. Optim., 23 (2013), pp. 1126– 1153

  46. [46]

    Richt ´arik and M

    P. Richt ´arik and M. Tak ´aˇc, Iteration complexity of randomized block-coordinate descent methods for minimizing a composite function , Math. Program., 144 (2014), pp. 1–38

  47. [47]

    Richt´arik and M

    P. Richt´arik and M. Tak ´aˇc, Parallel coordinate descent methods for big data optimization , Math. Program., 156 (2016), pp. 433–484

  48. [48]

    Roulet and A

    V. Roulet and A. d’Aspremont , Sharpness, restart, and acceleration , SIAM J. Optim., 30 (2020), pp. 262–289

  49. [49]

    Sun and M

    R. Sun and M. Hong , Improved iteration complexity bounds of cyclic block coordinate de- scent for convex problems, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, Curran Associates, Inc., 2015

  50. [50]

    Sun and Y

    R. Sun and Y. Ye , Worst-case complexity of cyclic coordinate descent: O(n2) gap with ran- domized version, Math. Program., 185 (2021), pp. 487–520

  51. [51]

    Tai, Rate of convergence for some constraint decomposition methods for nonlinear vari- ational inequalities, Numer

    X.-C. Tai, Rate of convergence for some constraint decomposition methods for nonlinear vari- ational inequalities, Numer. Math., 93 (2003), pp. 755–786

  52. [52]

    Tai and M

    X.-C. Tai and M. Espedal , Rate of convergence of some space decomposition methods for linear and nonlinear problems , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), pp. 1558–1570

  53. [53]

    Tai and J

    X.-C. Tai and J. Xu, Global and uniform convergence of subspace correction methods for some convex optimization problems, Math. Comp., 71 (2002), pp. 105–124

  54. [54]

    Toselli and O

    A. Toselli and O. Widlund , Domain Decomposition Methods-Algorithms and Theory , Springer, Berlin, 2005

  55. [55]

    Tseng, Convergence of a block coordinate descent method for nondifferentiable minimiza- tion, J

    P. Tseng, Convergence of a block coordinate descent method for nondifferentiable minimiza- tion, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 109 (2001), pp. 475–494

  56. [56]

    S. J. Wright, Coordinate descent algorithms, Math. Program., 151 (2015), pp. 3–34

  57. [57]

    Xu, Iterative methods by space decomposition and subspace correction, SIAM Rev., 34 (1992), pp

    J. Xu, Iterative methods by space decomposition and subspace correction, SIAM Rev., 34 (1992), pp. 581–613

  58. [58]

    Xu and L

    J. Xu and L. Zikatanov , The method of alternating projections and the method of subspace corrections in Hilbert space, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 15 (2002), pp. 573–597

  59. [59]

    Xu and L

    J. Xu and L. Zikatanov, Algebraic multigrid methods, Acta Numer., 26 (2017), pp. 591–721

  60. [60]

    Xu and W

    Y. Xu and W. Yin, A block coordinate descent method for regularized multiconvex optimization with applications to nonnegative tensor factorization and completion , SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 6 (2013), pp. 1758–1789

  61. [61]

    J. Zeng, T. T.-K. Lau, S. Lin, and Y. Yao, Global convergence of block coordinate descent in deep learning, in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97, PMLR, 2019, pp. 7313–7323

  62. [62]

    Zhang and M

    Z. Zhang and M. Brand , Convergent block coordinate descent for training Tikhonov regular- ized deep neural networks, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc., 2017