Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 30 references

The Klein-Gordon equation on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes: the Feynman propagator

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs a global Feynman propagator for the massive Klein-Gordon operator with asymptotically static potentials on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes, and proves it satisfies a microlocal Hadamard condition.

desk verdict The Fredholm construction is a genuine step forward, but the paper overclaims the Hadamard condition: Theorem 6.3 proves only a one-sided wavefront inclusion, while Definition 6.1 promises a kernel-level equality. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01600 v1 pith:6A64Y3T6 submitted 2025-07-02 math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MP

Dean Baskin , Moritz Doll , Jesse Gell-Redman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.FAmath.MP MSC 35L0535Q4058J4081T20
keywords FeynmanpropagatorKlein-GordonequationasymptoticallystaticpotentialmicrolocalHadamardcondition3sc-calculuspropagationofsingularitiesradialpointsFredholmtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the Klein-Gordon operator $P_V = \square_g - m^2 - V$, where $V$ is a decaying potential that becomes static at timelike infinity, admits a well-defined global Feynman propagator on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes. It claims that $P_V$ is a Fredholm map between specially designed Sobolev-type spaces, and that under natural hypotheses (self-adjointness and positivity of the limiting spatial Hamiltonians) this map is invertible. The inverse is shown to be independent of all parameters and cutoffs used in its construction, and to satisfy the wavefront-set inclusion that characterizes the Feynman propagator. If correct, this gives a robust route to quantum-field-theoretic propagators on curved backgrounds without imposing global spectral hypotheses on each time slice.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the 3sc-calculus, a pseudodifferential calculus on the radially compactified spacetime blown up at the two poles where an asymptotically static potential fails to be smooth. Its principal symbol has four components: the standard fiber symbol, the spacetime-infinity symbol, and two indicial families $Πhat{N}_{\mathrm{ff},\pm}(P_V)(\tau) = \tau^2 - H_{V_\pm}$ that encode the limiting spatial Hamiltonians. The argument also uses microlocal cutoffs $Q_{\mathrm{src}}$ localizing to the radial sources $R_{\mathrm{src}}$ of the Hamiltonian flow, together with propagation estimates of three types: elliptic estimates away from the characteristic set, real principal-type estimates on the characteristic set away from the radial set, and above- and below-threshold radial point estimates near the sources and sinks. These are assembled into a global Fredholm estimate that yields the Feynman spaces and the invertibility of the map.

What would settle it

Check a concrete asymptotically Minkowski metric whose compactified Hamiltonian flow admits a trapped bicharacteristic; if the global Fredholm estimate of Lemma 5.2 still holds, the framework is more general, whereas if it fails, this paper's Feynman construction does not cover that spacetime. Also compute the indicial family $\tau^2 - H_{V_\pm}$: if $0$ is an eigenvalue of either limiting Hamiltonian, the main invertibility theorems do not apply.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Feynman propagator for $P_V$ can be realized as the inverse of a Fredholm map between weighted scattering Sobolev spaces, with the Feynman condition encoded by microlocal cutoffs at the radial sources of the Hamiltonian flow rather than by variable-order weights. Theorem 5.1 states that, when the limiting spatial Hamiltonians $H_{V_\pm} = \Delta + m^2 + V_\pm$ have purely absolutely continuous spectrum near $m^2$ and no bound states, the map $P_V : X^{s,\ell_0,\ell_+} \to Y^{s,\ell_0,\ell_+}$ is Fredholm; if $V$ is self-adjoint with $V \in \rho_{\mathrm{mf}} \mathrm{Diff}^1_{3\mathrm{sc}}$, the map is invertible. Theorem 7.3 extends invertibility to the case of finitely many bound states in $(0,m^2)$ provided $H_{V_\pm} > 0$. In both settings the inverse $(P_V)^{-1}_{\mathrm{Fey}}$ is independent of the choice of Sobolev parameters and microlocal cutoffs, and Theorem 6.3 proves the wavefront-set inclusion $\mathrm{WF}_{\mathrm{cl}}((P_V)^{-1}_{\mathrm{Fey}} f) \subset \mathrm{WF}_{\mathrm{cl}}(f) \cup \bigcup_{s \geq 0} \Phi^s(\mathrm{WF}_{\mathrm{cl}}(f) \cap \mathrm{Char}(P_0))$, which is the microlocal Hadamard condition.

Load-bearing premise

The construction rests on the dynamical assumption that the background metric is non-trapping and that the Hamiltonian flow of the unperturbed operator splits its radial set cleanly into global sources and sinks; if trapped bicharacteristics existed or the radial components interacted, the propagation estimates that assemble the Fredholm problem could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A global Feynman inverse for the massive Klein-Gordon operator exists for asymptotically static potentials without using variable-order Sobolev spaces.
  • The constructed inverse satisfies the microlocal Hadamard condition, so it qualifies as a distinguished parametrix in the sense used in quantum field theory on curved spacetimes.
  • The Fredholm setup requires only non-trapping dynamics in the finite region and control of bound states at timelike infinity, not global spectral assumptions on time slices.
  • In the self-adjoint setting with positive limiting Hamiltonians, the Feynman propagator is uniquely defined and independent of all construction choices.
  • An anti-Feynman propagator is obtained by interchanging the roles of sources and sinks in the same Fredholm construction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same Fredholm framework should produce a global Feynman parametrix for first-order perturbations and for metric perturbations with weaker decay, since the proof already accommodates potentials of order $r \geq \max\{1,\ell_+ - \ell_0\}$.
  • Beyond the paper: the assumption that $0 \notin \sigma(H_{V_\pm})$ hints that a zero eigenvalue of the limiting Hamiltonian would generate threshold solutions with linear time growth, which would require a modified Fredholm problem rather than the one constructed here.
  • Beyond the paper: the wavefront-set inclusion at the level of distributions is a natural first step toward proving the Hadamard property for the associated two-point function, but proving positivity of the resulting bi-solution would require additional analysis that the paper does not carry out.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs Feynman propagators for massive Klein-Gordon operators with asymptotically static potentials on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes. The authors set up a Fredholm problem PV: X_{s,ℓ0,ℓ+} → Y_{s,ℓ0,ℓ+} in the 3sc-calculus, using microlocal cutoffs at the radial sources of the Hamiltonian flow in place of variable-order Sobolev spaces. They prove Fredholmness and, under self-adjointness and positivity or absence of bound states of the limiting spatial Hamiltonians, invertibility; the inverse is shown to be independent of the parameters and cutoffs. They also prove a one-sided classical wavefront set inclusion for solutions with compactly supported forcing, and an analogous bound-state result. The claimed novelty is a global Feynman propagator for asymptotically static potentials without a global time-splitting or time-slice spectral assumptions.

Significance. The Fredholm framework and the avoidance of variable-order weights by microlocal cutoffs are substantial technical contributions. If the results are correct, the paper would provide the first construction of Feynman propagators at this level of generality for asymptotically static potentials, extending work of Gérard–Wrochna and Vasy. The paper is careful about independence of cutoffs and about bound-state obstructions. However, the advertised microlocal Hadamard condition is only proved in a one-sided form; the kernel-level equality in Definition 6.1 is not established, so the paper's central claim as stated is stronger than the proof.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6, Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.3] Definition 6.1 defines a Feynman parametrix by the kernel-level equality ~WF(E) = diag(T*X\0) ∪ ⋃_{s≥0} Φ^s(diag Char(P0)). Proposition 6.2 derives from this equality only the one-sided inclusion WFcl(Ef) ⊂ WFcl(f) ∪ ⋃_{s≥0} Φ^s(WFcl(f)∩Char(P0)), and Theorem 6.3 proves exactly that one-sided inclusion, with the proof given as a single sentence: 'This theorem follows directly from the propagation estimates in the scattering calculus.' No argument is supplied for the reverse inclusion: namely, that every point of the diagonal and every forward-flowed characteristic pair actually belongs to ~WF((PV)_Fey^{-1}). Hörmander's composition theorem gives only the containment direction from a solution-wise inclusion, not equality. Since the abstract and introduction advertise the microlocal Hadamard condition, this gap is load-bearing. The authors should either prove the equality at the kernel level, or explicitly weaken the claim and Definition 6.1 to a one-sided singularity-propagation statement.
  2. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2 and Theorem 5.1] The global Fredholm estimate in Lemma 5.2 is the technical core of Theorem 5.1, but its proof is not fully self-contained. In particular, the proof uses an open cover O1,...,O4 of the compressed cotangent bundle with six listed properties, and the existence of this cover is asserted with 'The proof that such a cover exists is similar to the case in [2].' Since the paper deliberately departs from the variable-order setting of [2], it should either state this cover construction as a precise lemma with the hypotheses used here, or give a detailed proof that the estimates of Propositions 4.8–4.10 combine in exactly this fixed-weight setting. As written, the central Fredholm estimate rests on an unstated technical lemma.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7, paragraph after (40)] The sentence 'Near NP we allow asymptotics as in (40) with τ0 > 0 and exclude those with τ0 < 0, while near NP we exclude those with τ0 < 0' contains a typo: the second 'NP' should be 'SP'.
  2. [Section 2, Theorem 2.3] Theorem 2.3 is stated without proof in Section 2; the authors should either prove the free-case invertibility directly or explicitly refer to the general proof in Section 5, since the free case is covered by the later argument.
  3. [Throughout, Theorem 2.3 and Theorem 6.3] The notation for wavefront sets is inconsistent: Theorem 2.3 uses WF, while Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.3 use WFcl. Please unify the notation and define both classical and 3sc-wavefront sets clearly in one place.
  4. [Section 6, after Proposition 6.2] The sentence 'The inverse (PV)_Fey^{-1} as constructed in Proposition 5.7 has the same property' is ambiguous, because Proposition 6.2 states a one-sided inclusion, whereas Definition 6.1 states an equality. The authors should specify that the inverse satisfies the one-sided inclusion only.
  5. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2] The proof of Lemma 5.2 would be easier to verify if the interpolation argument and the absorption of the ∥QsrcGϕu∥_{s−1,ℓ′} term were written out rather than referenced to [2, Eq. (2.39)], especially because the spaces here are not the variable-order spaces of [2].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Feynman construction reduces to prior causal-propagator theorems and 3sc propagation estimates that do not contain the target result; Theorem 6.3's one-sided wavefront inclusion is a proof gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. The spaces X_{s,ℓ0,ℓ+}, Y_{s,ℓ0,ℓ+} are defined by microlocal cutoffs that encode the Feynman boundary condition (above-threshold regularity at Rsrc), but the existence of the inverse, its independence of parameters and cutoffs, and the wavefront inclusion are not restatements of those definitions: they use the 3sc elliptic, real-principal-type, and radial-point propagation estimates quoted from the authors' earlier causal-propagator paper [2] (Propositions 4.8-4.10 here) and the causal invertibility theorems [2, Thm 8.2/8.3]. Those cited results concern the causal propagators and the Klein-Gordon flow, not the Feynman inverse; they are parameter-free prior theorems whose assumptions do not include the present conclusion, so the self-citations are legitimate mathematical dependencies rather than circular ones. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is repackaged under new coordinates. One caveat that affects correctness, not circularity: Theorem 6.3 proves only the one-sided inclusion WFcl((PV)_Fey^{-1}f) ⊂ WFcl(f) ∪ ∪_{s≥0} Φ^s(WFcl(f)∩Char(P0)), while Definition 6.1 defines a Feynman parametrix by the kernel-level equality ~WF(E) = diag ∪ ∪_{s≥0} Φ^s(diag Char(P0)); the converse half of the equality is not established, so the advertised microlocal Hadamard condition can at most be read as the weaker solution-wise inclusion. This is an overreach in theorem strength, not an equivalence of the result with its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The axioms are the standing analytical hypotheses: the background non-trapping metric, the global radial source/sink structure from [2], the asymptotically static potential class, the spectral assumptions on HV±, and the imported 3sc propagation estimates from [2].

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Vasy's 3sc-calculus results (boundedness, symbol matching, elliptic regularity, functional calculus for Gψ)
    Recalled in Section 3 from Vasy [24,25] and [2]; the construction of the Feynman spaces relies on these.
  • domain assumption Non-trapping background metric g with g − gM ∈ S^{-2}(R^{n+1}), and P0-flow with global radial sources/sinks Rsrc/Rsnk
    Assumed after (7) and in Theorem 2.1 (from [2, Sect 2.5]); this gives the global source/sink structure used by the radial point estimates.
  • domain assumption V is asymptotically static of order r, V ∈ ρmf 3scΨ^{1,0}, and V − V* ∈ 3scΨ^{0,−2}
    Definition 4.1 and hypotheses of Theorems 5.1 and 7.2/7.3; this puts PV into the 3sc calculus.
  • domain assumption Limiting Hamiltonians HV± have purely absolutely continuous spectrum on [m²,∞) and no bound states, or in the bound-state case finitely many bound states in (0,m²), 0 ∉ σ(HV±), and HV± > 0
    Hypotheses of Theorem 5.1, Theorem 7.2, and Theorem 7.3; used to prove Fredholmness and invertibility.
  • domain assumption The 3sc propagation estimates of [2] stated as Propositions 4.8, 4.9, and 4.10 apply to PV
    Quoted from the authors' previous paper [2]; they are the engine behind Lemma 5.2's global estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Klein-Gordon equation on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes: the Feynman propagator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6A64Y3T6

@misc{pith2026250701600,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Klein-Gordon equation on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes: the Feynman propagator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6A64Y3T6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01600}
}
abstract

We develop a theory of Feynman propagators for the massive Klein--Gordon equation with asymptotically static perturbations. Building on our previous work on the causal propagators, we employ a framework based on propagation of singularities estimates in Vasy's 3sc-calculus. We combine these estimates to prove global spacetime mapping properties for the Feynman propagator, and to show that it satisfies a microlocal Hadamard condition. We show that the Feynman propagator can be realized as the inverse of a mapping between appropriate $L^2$-based Sobolev spaces with additional regularity near the asymptotic sources of the Hamiltonian flow, realized as a family of radial points on a compactified spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01600 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The blow-down map βC : [X; C] → X. is well defined and satisfies the following Hadamard property; for f ∈ C−∞ c , (29) WF((P0) −1 Feyf) ⊂ WF(f) ∪ [ s≥0 Φs (WF(f) ∩ Char(P0)) ∪ Rsnk . where Φs is the Hamiltonian flow on ∂ scT ∗X. 3. 3sc-calculus for the Klein–Gordon operator 3.1. Basics of the 3sc-calculus. In this section, we recall the basics of the 3sc-calculus first introduced by Vasy [24] with adaptions to treat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The set BV,+ ⊂ W⊥ + exclude those with τ0 < 0, while near NP we allow asymptotics as in (40) with τ0 < 0 and exclude those with τ0 > 0. We set BV,src := {(f, τ ): τ ∈ BV,+, τ < 0} ∪ {(p, τ ): τ ∈ BV,−, τ > 0} , BV,snk := {(f, τ ): τ ∈ BV,+, τ > 0} ∪ {(p, τ ): τ ∈ BV,−, τ < 0} . To quantify this inclusion/exclusion statement, we introduce the Fourier localizing bound state projectors from [2, Sect. 8.2]. Specifically… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Baskin, M

    D. Baskin, M. Doll, and J. Gell-Redman,The Klein-Gordon equation on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes: causal propagators(2024), available atarXiv:2409.01134v2

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Bär and A

    Ch. Bär and A. Strohmaier,An index theorem for Lorentzian manifolds with compact spacelike Cauchy boundary, Amer. J. Math.141 (2019), no. 5, 1421–1455, DOI 10.1353/ajm.2019.0037. MR4011805

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Baskin, A

    D. Baskin, A. Vasy, and J. Wunsch,Asymptotics of radiation fields in asymptotically Minkowski space, Amer. J. Math.137 (2015), no. 5, 1293–1364, DOI 10.1353/ajm.2015.0033. MR3405869

    arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Dereziński and D

    J. Dereziński and D. Siemssen,Feynman propagators on static spacetimes, Rev. Math. Phys.30 (2018), no. 3, 1850006, 23, DOI 10.1142/S0129055X1850006X. MR3770965

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x1850006x 2018

  5. [5]

    , An evolution equation approach to the Klein-Gordon operator on curved spacetime, Pure Appl. Anal. 1 (2019), no. 2, 215–261, DOI 10.2140/paa.2019.1.215. MR3949374

    work page doi:10.2140/paa.2019.1.215 2019

  6. [6]

    J. J. Duistermaat and L. Hörmander,Fourier integral operators. II, Acta Math. 128 (1972), no. 3-4, 183–269, DOI 10.1007/BF02392165. MR0388464

    doi:10.1007/bf02392165 1972

  7. [7]

    Gell-Redman, N

    J. Gell-Redman, N. Haber, and A. Vasy,The Feynman propagator on perturbations of Minkowski space, Comm. Math. Phys. 342 (2016), no. 1, 333–384, DOI 10.1007/s00220-015-2520-8. MR3455153 FEYNMAN PROPAGATOR FOR KLEIN–GORDON 41

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2520-8 2016

  8. [8]

    Gérard, H

    Ch. Gérard, H. Isozaki, and E. Skibsted,Commutator algebra and resolvent estimates, Spectral and scattering theory and applications, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 23, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 1994, pp. 69–82, DOI 10.2969/aspm/02310069. MR1275395

    work page arXiv 1994

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Gérard and M

    Ch. Gérard and M. Wrochna,The massive Feynman propagator on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes, Amer. J. Math.141(2019), no. 6, 1501–1546, DOI 10.1353/ajm.2019.0042. MR4030522

    2019

  2. [10]

    , The massive Feynman propagator on asymptotically Minkowski spacetimes II, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN20 (2020), 6856–6870, DOI 10.1093/imrn/rnz007. MR4172671

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Hintz,Microlocal analysis of operators with asymptotic translation- and dilation-invariances (2023), available atarXiv:2302.13803

    P. Hintz,Microlocal analysis of operators with asymptotic translation- and dilation-invariances (2023), available atarXiv:2302.13803

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    , Linear waves on asymptotically flat spacetimes(2023), available atarXiv:2302.14647

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    , Gluing small black holes along timelike geodesics I: formal solution(2023), available at arXiv:2306.07409

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hintz and A

    P. Hintz and A. Vasy,Semilinear wave equations on asymptotically de Sitter, Kerr–de Sitter and Minkowski spacetimes, Anal. PDE8 (2015), no. 8, 1807–1890, DOI 10.2140/apde.2015.8.1807. MR3441208

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    , Microlocal analysis near null infinity in asymptotically flat spacetimes(2023), available at arXiv:2302.14613

    2023

  8. [16]

    Hörmander,The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    L. Hörmander,The analysis of linear partial differential operators. I, Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003. Distribution theory and Fourier analysis; Reprint of the second (1990) edition [Springer, Berlin; MR1065993 (91m:35001a)]. MR1996773

    1990

  9. [17]

    Islam and A

    O. Islam and A. Strohmaier,On microlocalisation and the construction of Feynman Propagators for normally hyperbolic operators(2012), available atarXiv:2012.09767

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Ma,A second microlocalization for the three-body calculus(2024), available atarXiv:2411

    Y. Ma,A second microlocalization for the three-body calculus(2024), available atarXiv:2411. 11771

    2024

  11. [19]

    R. B. Melrose,Spectral and scattering theory for the Laplacian on asymptotically Euclidian spaces, Spectral and scattering theory (Sanda, 1992), Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., vol. 161, Dekker, New York, 1994, pp. 85–130. MR1291640

    1992

  12. [20]

    Nakamura and K

    Sh. Nakamura and K. Taira,Essential self-adjointness of Klein-Gordon type operators on asymp- totically static, Cauchy-compact spacetimes, Comm. Math. Phys.398 (2023), no. 3, 1153–1169, DOI 10.1007/s00220-022-04543-2. MR4561800

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Henri Poincaré 24 (2023), no

    , A remark on the essential self-adjointness for Klein-Gordon-type operators, Ann. Henri Poincaré 24 (2023), no. 8, 2587–2605, DOI 10.1007/s00023-023-01277-2. MR4612312

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time, Comm

    M. Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time, Comm. Math. Phys.179 (1996), no. 3, 529–553. MR1400751

    1996

  15. [23]

    Sussman,Massive wave propagation near null infinity(2023), available atarXiv:2305.01119

    E. Sussman,Massive wave propagation near null infinity(2023), available atarXiv:2305.01119

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Vasy,Propagation of singularities in three-body scattering, Astérisque 262 (2000), vi+151 (English, with English and French summaries)

    A. Vasy,Propagation of singularities in three-body scattering, Astérisque 262 (2000), vi+151 (English, with English and French summaries). MR1744795

    2000

  17. [25]

    , Propagation of singularities in many-body scattering, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4)34 (2001), no. 3, 313–402, DOI 10.1016/S0012-9593(01)01066-7 (English, with English and French summaries). MR1839579

    2001 doi

  18. [26]

    Math.194 (2013), no

    , Microlocal analysis of asymptotically hyperbolic and Kerr-de Sitter spaces (with an appendix by Semyon Dyatlov), Invent. Math.194 (2013), no. 2, 381–513, DOI 10.1007/s00222- 012-0446-8. MR3117526

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    II, Math

    , Microlocal analysis of asymptotically hyperbolic spaces and high-energy resolvent estimates, Inverse problems and applications: inside out. II, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 60, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 487–528. MR3135765 42 D. BASKIN, M. DOLL, AND J. ...

    2013

  20. [28]

    , A minicourse on microlocal analysis for wave propagation, Asymptotic analysis in general relativity, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 443, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2018, pp. 219–374. MR3792086

    2018

  21. [29]

    , Essential self-adjointness of the wave operator and the limiting absorption principle on Lorentzian scattering spaces, J. Spectr. Theory10 (2020), no. 2, 439–461, DOI 10.4171/JST/301. MR4107521

    2020 doi

  22. [31]

    Partial Differential Equations46 (2021), no

    , Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces, a Lagrangian approach, Comm. Partial Differential Equations46 (2021), no. 5, 823–863, DOI 10.1080/03605302.2020.1857401. MR4265462 Dean Baskin: Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University,...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.