Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 64 references

Almost Calabi-Yau with torsion 6-manifolds and the instanton condition

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On compact ACYT 6-manifolds with co-closed Lee form, the torsion connection is an SU(3)-instanton exactly when its torsion is parallel; the Hull connection is an instanton exactly when the torsion is closed.

desk verdict The new converses are real and the proofs hold up; the only meaningful risk is a sign or index slip in three compressed computations. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01655 v2 pith:ULALZVYS submitted 2025-07-02 math.DG hep-th

Stefan Ivanov , Luis Ugarte This is my paper
classification math.DGhep-th MSC 53C5553C2153C2953Z05
keywords torsionconnectionSU(3)holonomyalmostCalabi-YauwithSU(3)-instantonStrominger-BismutHullparallelLeeform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Almost Calabi-Yau with torsion (ACYT) 6-manifolds carry a unique metric connection with totally skew-symmetric torsion that preserves their SU(3) structure; on complex manifolds this is the Strominger-Bismut connection. The paper asks when the curvature of that connection, or of the associated Hull connection, satisfies the SU(3)-instanton (Yang-Mills) condition. It establishes that on a compact ACYT 6-manifold with co-closed Lee form the torsion connection is an SU(3)-instanton if and only if the torsion is parallel with respect to that connection, and the same holds on balanced ACYT manifolds without compactness. For the Hull connection the answer is cleaner: it is an SU(3)-instanton exactly when the torsion is closed, $dT=0$. Since the Hull-Strominger system imposes an instanton condition in its anomaly-cancellation equation, these equivalences turn a difficult PDE condition into a concrete statement about the torsion, with immediate consequences for which known compact complex and non-complex examples qualify.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the torsion connection $\nabla = \nabla^g - \tfrac{1}{2}T$, the unique metric connection with totally skew-symmetric torsion $T$ preserving the SU(3)-structure; in the integrable case it is the Strominger-Bismut connection, and $\nabla^h = \nabla^g + \tfrac{1}{2}T$ is the Hull connection. The instanton condition is that the curvature 2-form is of type $(1,1)$ and trace-free with respect to the SU(3) decomposition. The arguments use curvature identities linking $R$, $R^h$, $\nabla T$ and $dT$, including the difference formula that connects the torsion connection and the Hull connection, and an algebraic lemma from [41]: a 4-form whose interior product with every vector field lies in the $\Lambda^3_{12}$ component of the SU(3)-representation must vanish. That lemma is what upgrades componentwise vanishings, obtained from the instanton condition, to $\nabla T = 0$ or $dT = 0$. The compact co-closed case uses a maximum-principle argument on $\|\theta\|^2$ to upgrade $\delta\theta=0$ to $\nabla\theta=0$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the algebraic lemma at a point: with the model SU(3) forms (3.14), search for a non-zero 4-form $A$ such that $X\lrcorner A \in \Lambda^3_{12}$ for every vector field $X$; a single example would falsify the mechanism. Separately, one could compute on a compact ACYT 6-manifold with co-closed but non-parallel Lee form and test whether SU(3)-instanton curvature forces $\nabla T=0$; the theorem predicts no counterexample exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms the paper's central claim is a pair of rigidity theorems. Theorem 1.3 states: if $(M,g,J,\Psi)$ is a compact ACYT 6-manifold with co-closed Lee form, then the curvature of the torsion connection $\nabla$ is an SU(3)-instanton exactly when $\nabla T=0$. Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 give the same equivalence under constant norm of the Nijenhuis tensor with $\nabla$-parallel Lee form, and in the balanced case $\theta=0$ with no compactness assumption; Corollary 1.4 transcribes this to CYT manifolds, where the torsion connection is the Strominger-Bismut connection. Theorem 1.5 concerns the SU(3)-Hull connection $\nabla^h$ (the metric connection with torsion $-T$): on any ACYT 6-manifold it is an SU(3)-instanton if and only if $dT=0$. The proofs identify the instanton condition with componentwise vanishing of the 4-forms $d^{\nabla}T$ and $dT$, and then use an algebraic lemma to conclude the whole 4-form vanishes.

Load-bearing premise

Everything in the main equivalences rests on the algebraic lemma from [41]: a 4-form whose interior product with every vector field lies in the 12-dimensional component $\Lambda^3_{12}$ of the SU(3)-decomposition must be zero; if a counterexample exists, the instanton condition would only control part of $d^{\nabla}T$ or $dT$ and the theorems would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On compact CYT 6-manifolds with co-closed Lee form, the Strominger-Bismut connection is an SU(3)-instanton exactly for the Bismut-parallel torsion geometries, so the instanton equation is equivalent to a torsion condition that is already classified in the literature.
  • On balanced CYT 6-manifolds, compact or not, the same equivalence holds; combining it with the classification of balanced Hermitian threefolds with parallel Bismut torsion yields a description of all such instanton spaces.
  • An SU(3)-instanton Hull connection on an ACYT 6-manifold forces $dT=0$, which in the complex case is the pluriclosed condition, placing Hull instantons inside the pluriclosed class studied through generalized Ricci flow.
  • The known nilmanifold, solvmanifold and $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$-quotient examples with parallel torsion are genuine SU(3)-instanton examples, and the converse direction constrains any balanced invariant example from a unimodular Lie group to those Lie algebras.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the main equivalences are right, the SU(3)-instanton condition for the Bismut connection is not a genuinely new PDE but a rigidity statement: on compact ACYT spaces with co-closed Lee form it selects exactly the parallel-torsion geometries, so the instanton condition and the Bismut-parallel condition coincide.
  • The Hull theorem suggests that in heterotic compactifications where the tangent-bundle connection is the Hull connection, the anomaly-cancellation form $dT$ must vanish, tying the existence of such instantons to pluriclosed geometry; one could test by construction whether non-pluriclosed ACYT spaces admit any instanton connection in the Hull line.
  • The algebraic lemma that a 4-form whose contractions lie in $\Lambda^3_{12}$ must vanish may extend to other holonomy reductions, such as G2 or Spin(7) structures, where an analogous representation-theoretic statement would turn instanton component conditions into closure conditions; the paper does not pursue this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies SU(3)-instanton conditions for the unique torsion connection preserving an SU(3)-structure with skew torsion (the Bismut/Strominger connection in the complex case) and for the associated Hull connection on almost Calabi-Yau with torsion (ACYT) 6-manifolds. The main results are Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.3: under a constant-norm Nijenhuis tensor and a ∇-parallel Lee form, or under compactness with co-closed Lee form, the torsion connection is an SU(3)-instanton iff its torsion is ∇-parallel. Corollaries 1.2 and 1.4 specialize to balanced ACYT and CYT spaces. Theorem 1.5 states that the SU(3)-Hull connection is an SU(3)-instanton iff the torsion is closed, dT=0. The proofs combine curvature identities for connections with skew torsion with the algebraic Proposition 3.1, which converts componentwise vanishings into vanishing of 4-forms. The final sections provide explicit compact examples (nilmanifolds, solvmanifolds, SL(2,C) quotients) and a non-complex nilmanifold example, plus an appendix on the Chern instanton.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes clean equivalences between the instanton/Yang-Mills condition and parallel or closed torsion in non-Kähler geometries relevant to heterotic string compactifications and generalized Ricci flow. The results are specific and falsifiable: the examples verify the forward direction and the theorems provide the converse. The proof strategy is sound; the main technical step is the reduction to Proposition 3.1, and the paper appropriately credits [40,41] for standard identities. The examples and the appendix add value. There are no fitted parameters, and the argument is not circular; reliance on earlier work by the first author is a normal mathematical dependency.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3, Proposition 3.1] Proposition 3.1 is the pivotal algebraic input that turns the identities (5.35), (5.39), and (5.66) into the vanishing of the 4-forms d∇T and dT; because the main theorems terminate in this step, I recommend including a short proof (for instance, via the Lefschetz isomorphism and the characterization of Λ^3_12 by orthogonality to F∧Ψ±) so that the kernel identification is self-contained and the reader does not have to consult [41].
  2. [Section 5.4, Eq. (5.63)] The inequality in (5.63) has the form Lu≤0 with an elliptic operator L; to conclude d||θ||^2=0 the applicable statement is the strong minimum principle (or a maximum principle for -L), not the strong maximum principle as written, and the coefficient of θ^i∇_i||θ||^2 on the left should be rechecked against (5.58)-(5.62).
  3. [Section 5.5, Eq. (5.66)] The identity Ric(X,V)-Rich(V,X)=0 used after (5.66) is stated as the trace of (5.65); please spell out the contraction (which indices are traced and in what order) because this identity is needed to conclude dT_{iabc}Φ_{jabc}=0.
  4. [Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.46)-(5.50)] The derivation of the complex components of C in (5.50) from (5.47)-(5.49) is very compressed; several signs are not transparent. Adding a few intermediate steps (or a supplementary symbolic check) would make the proof of Lemma 5.7 and Theorem 5.8 verifiable without rederiving the whole index computation.
  5. [Section 5.3, Theorem 5.8] At the start of the proof of Theorem 5.8 the statement 'the Nijenhuis tensor N=4T^- is ∇-parallel' is used without comment; it follows from [41] because ∇θ=0 implies dθ=0, but this should be stated explicitly in Theorem 1.1 or its proof.
  6. [Section 6.1 and references] The references [19] and [20] appear to list the same paper twice; in addition, there are several English typos (e.g. 'Theorem 1.5 connected compact' in the introduction should be 'connects compact'), and the notation around (5.46) has a small typographical slip.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central equivalences are derived from curvature identities, and the cited prior results are independent mathematical facts rather than restatements of the paper's conclusions.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters and no quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict. The main results, Theorems 1.3 and 1.5, assert equivalences between an SU(3)-instanton condition, expressed independently in (5.26)-(5.27), and the differential conditions ∇T=0 or dT=0. The proofs proceed by standard curvature identities such as (2.3), (2.4), (2.6), (2.9), (5.31), and (5.65), together with representation-theoretic facts about SU(3)-structures. The algebraic Lemma 3.1 is quoted from the authors' earlier paper [41], and it is genuinely load-bearing, but it is a general statement about 4-forms and the SU(3)-module Λ^3_12, not a disguised version of the instanton-to-parallel-torsion claim; it is independently plausible and is used only to convert componentwise vanishings into vanishing of a 4-form. Similarly, [41, Theorem 4.4] supplies the compactness input that the Nijenhuis tensor is ∇-parallel, and [40, Proposition 3.2] supplies the general identity (5.54); these are prior published results, not assumptions equivalent to the target theorems. No equation in the paper is shown to be equal to its own input by construction, and no fitted or calibrated quantity is later reported as a prediction. The derivation is therefore self-contained modulo ordinary mathematical dependencies, and there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The central claim rests on standard curvature identities for metric connections with skew torsion, the existence/uniqueness of the torsion connection on G1 manifolds, the algebraic lemma Proposition 3.1 from [41], and the theorem that compact ACYT manifolds have ∇-parallel Nijenhuis tensor from [41]. These are cited published results, not assumptions tailored to the target theorem.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Proposition 3.1 of [41]: if A is a 4-form and X⌟A ∈ Λ^3_12 for every vector field X, then A = 0.
    Used in Sections 5.3 and 5.5 to conclude d∇T = 0 or dT = 0 from vanishing of their projections onto irreducible SU(3) components. Cited without proof.
  • standard math Existence and uniqueness of the torsion connection preserving an almost Hermitian G1 structure with totally skew-symmetric torsion, and the identity T = -dF^+(J,J,J) + N/4.
    Framework of ACYT spaces; quoted from [18, Theorem 10.1] and used throughout Sections 2.2 and 5.
  • domain assumption On a compact ACYT 6-manifold the Nijenhuis tensor is ∇-parallel, ∇N = 0, so its norm is constant.
    Invoked in Section 5.4 to pass from Theorem 1.1 to compact Theorem 1.3; quoted from [41, Theorem 4.4].
  • standard math Curvature identities (2.3), (2.4), (2.6), (5.31) for metric connections with totally skew torsion.
    Workhorses of the computations in Section 5, taken from [36, 18, 40].
  • standard math Strong maximum principle for the operator ∆ + 3θ on a compact manifold.
    Used in Theorem 5.9 to conclude ∇θ = 0 from inequality (5.63); alternatively follows by integration using δθ = 0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Almost Calabi-Yau with torsion 6-manifolds and the instanton condition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ULALZVYS

@misc{pith2026250701655,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Almost Calabi-Yau with torsion 6-manifolds and the instanton condition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ULALZVYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01655}
}
abstract

It is observed that on a compact almost complex Calabi-Yau with torsion (ACYT) 6-manifold with co-closed Lee form the curvature of the torsion connection is an $SU(3)$-instanton if and only if the torsion is parallel with respect to the torsion connection. The same conclusion holds for any (non necessarily compact) balanced ACYT 6-manifold. In particular, on a CYT 6-manifold the Strominger-Bismut connection is an $SU(3)$-instanton if and only if the torsion is parallel with respect to the Strominger-Bismut connection provided either the CYT 6-manifold is compact with co-closed Lee form or it is a balanced CYT 6-manifold.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Ivanov and S

    P. Ivanov and S. Ivanov, SU(3) instantons and G2, Spin(7) heterotic string solitons , Commun. Math. Phys. 259 (2005), 79-102. 8, 18

    work page 2005

  2. [41]

    Ivanov, N

    S. Ivanov, N. Stanchev, The Riemannian curvature identities on almost Calabi-Yau with torsion 6-manifold and generalized Ricci solitons , Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923 -) 204 (2025), 513-542, DOI:10.1007/s10231-024-01494-4 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13

    work page doi:10.1007/s10231-024-01494-4 2025

  3. [1]

    Agricola, A

    I. Agricola, A. Ferreira, Einstein manifolds with skew torsion , The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 65, Issue 3, (2014), 717-741, https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/hat050 18

    work page doi:10.1093/qmath/hat050 2014

  4. [2]

    Agricola, A

    I. Agricola, A. Ferreira, Th. Friedrich, The classification of naturally reductive homogeneous spaces in dimensions n ≤ 6, Diff. Geom. Appl. 39 (2015), 59-92. 4

    work page 2015

  5. [3]

    Alexandrov, T

    B. Alexandrov, T. Friedrich, N. Schoemann, Almost Hermitian 6-manifolds revisited, J. Geom. Phys. 53 (2005) 1. 3

    work page 2005

  6. [4]

    Alexandrov, S

    B. Alexandrov, S. Ivanov, Vanishing theorems on Hermitian manifolds, Diff. Geom. Appl. 14 (2001), 251-265. 6

    work page 2001

  7. [5]

    Apostolov, G

    V. Apostolov, G. Barbaro, Kuan-Hui Lee, J. Streets, Rigidity results for non-K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau geometries on threefolds, arXiv:2408.09648. 4

    arXiv

  8. [6]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, K. Dasgupta, P. S. Green, Compactifications of Heterotic Theory on Non- K¨ ahler Complex Manifolds: I, JHEP 0304 (2003) 007. 2

    work page 2003

Show all 64 references
  1. [7]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, K. Dasgupta, P.S. Green, E. Sharpe, C ompactifications of Heterotic Strings on Non-K¨ ahler Complex Manifolds: II, Nucl. Phys.B678 (2004), 19-100. 2, 6

    2004

  2. [8]

    Belgun, A

    F. Belgun, A. Moroianu, Nearly K¨ ahler manifolds with reduced holonomy, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 19 (2001), 307-319. 2, 6, 18

    2001

  3. [9]

    Bedulli, L

    L. Bedulli, L. Vezzoni, The Ricci tensor of SU(3)-manifolds , J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007), n. 4, 1125-

    2007

  4. [10]

    J. M. Bismut, A local index theorem of non-K¨ ahler manifolds, Math. Ann. 284 (1989), 681-699. 2, 6

    1989

  5. [11]

    G. L. Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata, D. Lust, P. Manousselis, G. Zoupanos, Non-K¨ ahler String Backgrounds and their Five Torsion Classes , Nucl. Phys. B652 (2003) 5-34. 2, 7, 8 19

    2003

  6. [12]

    G. L. Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata, D. Lust, BPS Action and Superpotential for Heterotic String Compactifications with Fluxes , JHEP 0310 (2003) 004. 2

    2003

  7. [13]

    Chiossi, S

    S. Chiossi, S. Salamon, The intrinsic torsion of SU(3) and G2-structures, Differential Geometry, Valencia 2001, World Sci. Publishing, 2002, pp. 115-133. 7

    2001

  8. [14]

    Cleyton, A

    R. Cleyton, A. Moroianu, U. Semmelmann, Metric connections with parallel skew-symmetric torsion, Adv. Math. 378 (2021), Paper No. 107519, 50 pp., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2020.107519 3

    2021

  9. [15]

    T. C. Collins, S. Picard, S.-T. Yau, The Strominger system in the square of a K¨ ahler class , arXiv:2211.03784. 2

    arXiv

  10. [16]

    T. C. Collins, S. Picard, S.-T. Yau, Stability of the tangent bundle through conifold transitions , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 77 (2024), no. 1, 284-371. 2

    2024

  11. [17]

    Fern´ andez, S

    M. Fern´ andez, S. Ivanov, L. Ugarte, R. Villacampa, Non-K¨ ahler Heterotic String Compactifications with non-zero fluxes and constant dilaton , Commun. Math. Phys. 288 (2009), 677-697. 2, 15, 16

    2009

  12. [18]

    Friedrich, S

    Th. Friedrich, S. Ivanov, Parallel spinors and connections with skew-symmetric torsion in string theory, Asian J. Math. 6 (2002), 303-336. 2, 4, 5, 6

    2002

  13. [19]

    J. X. Fu, S.-T. Yau, The theory of superstring with flux on non-K¨ ahler manifolds and the complex Monge-Amp´ ere equation, J. Differential Geom. 78 (2008), no. 3, 369-428. 2, 8

    2008

  14. [20]

    J. X. Fu, S.-T. Yau, The theory of superstring with flux on non-K¨ ahler manifolds and the complex Monge-Ampere equation, J. Differential Geom. 78 (2009), 369-428. 2, 8

    2009

  15. [21]

    Garcia-Fernandez, J

    M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Jordan, J. Streets, Non-K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau geometry and pluriclosed flow, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 177 (2023), 329-367. 3

    2023

  16. [22]

    Garcia-Fernandez, R

    M. Garcia-Fernandez, R. Rubio, C. S. Shahbazi, C. Tipler, Canonical metrics on holomorphic Courant algebroids, Proc. London Math. Soc. 125 (2022), 700-758. 2

    2022

  17. [23]

    Garcia-Fernandez, J

    M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Streets, Generalized Ricci Flow. AMS University Lecture Series 76, 2021. 3, 5, 14

    2021

  18. [24]

    Gauduchon, Hermitian connections and Dirac operators , Boll

    P. Gauduchon, Hermitian connections and Dirac operators , Boll. Un. Mat. It. 11-B (1997) Suppl. Fasc., 257-288. 6

    1997

  19. [25]

    Gillard, G

    J. Gillard, G. Papadopoulos, D. Tsimpis, Anomaly, Fluxes and (2,0) Heterotic-String Compactifica- tions, JHEP 0306 (2003) 035. 2

    2003

  20. [26]

    Gray, The structure of nearly K¨ ahler manifolds, Math

    A. Gray, The structure of nearly K¨ ahler manifolds, Math. Ann. 223 (1976), 233-248. 2, 6

    1976

  21. [27]

    A. Gray, L. Hervella, The sixteen classes of almost Hermitian manifolds and their linear invariants , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 123 (1980), 35-58. 2, 5, 7

    1980

  22. [28]

    Gurrieri, J

    S. Gurrieri, J. Louis, A. Micu, D. Waldram, Mirror Symmetry in Generalized Calabi-Yau Compact- ifications, Nucl. Phys. B654 (2003) 61-113 2, 7

    2003

  23. [29]

    Gurrieri, A

    S. Gurrieri, A. Micu, Type IIB Theory on Half-flat Manifolds , Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003), 2181-

    2003

  24. [30]

    Gauntlett, D

    J. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, D. Waldram, Superstrings with Intrinsic torsion , Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 086002. 2

    2004

  25. [31]

    Gauntlett, N

    J. Gauntlett, N. Kim, D. Martelli, D. Waldram, Fivebranes wrapped on SLAG three-cycles and related geometry, JHEP 0111 (2001) 018. 2

    2001

  26. [32]

    Gauntlett, D

    J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis, D. Waldram,G-Structures and Wrapped NS5-Branes, Commun. Math. Phys. 247 (2004), 421-445. 2 20

    2004

  27. [33]

    A. S. Haupt, O. Lechtenfeld, E. T. Musaev, Order α′ heterotic domain walls with warped nearly K¨ ahler geometry, JHEP 1411 (2014) 152. 2

    2014

  28. [34]

    C. M. Hull, Compactification of the heterotic superstrings , Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986), 357-364. 2

    1986

  29. [36]

    Ivanov, Geometry of Quaternionic K¨ ahler connections with torsion, J

    S. Ivanov, Geometry of Quaternionic K¨ ahler connections with torsion, J. Geom. Phys. 41 (2002), 235-257. 4, 5, 10, 15

    2002

  30. [37]

    Ivanov, Heterotic supersymmetry, anomaly cancellation and equations of motion, Phys

    S. Ivanov, Heterotic supersymmetry, anomaly cancellation and equations of motion, Phys. Lett. B685 (2010), 190-196. 3, 16

    2010

  31. [38]

    Ivanov, G

    S. Ivanov, G. Papadopoulos, A no go theorem for string warped compactifications , Phys. Lett. B497 (2001) 309-316. 2

    2001

  32. [39]

    Ivanov, G

    S. Ivanov, G. Papadopoulos, Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds , Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 1089. 2, 4, 6, 19

    2001

  33. [40]

    Ivanov, N

    S. Ivanov, N. Stanchev, The Riemannian Bianchi identities of metric connections with skew torsion and generalized Ricci solitons , Results Math. 79, 270 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-024- 02302-4. 4, 5, 14, 18

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Jordan, J

    J. Jordan, J. Streets, On a Calabi-type estimate for pluriclosed flow , Adv. Math. 366 (2020), 107097, 18 pp. 3

    2020

  35. [43]

    Kirichenko, K-spaces of maximal rank (russian), Mat

    V. Kirichenko, K-spaces of maximal rank (russian), Mat. Zam. 22 (1977), 465-476. 2, 6, 18

    1977

  36. [44]

    Klaput, A

    M. Klaput, A. Lukas, C. Matti, Bundles over Nearly-K¨ ahler Homogeneous Spaces in Heterotic String Theory, JHEP 1109 (2011) 100. 2

    2011

  37. [45]

    Klaput, A

    M. Klaput, A. Lukas, C. Matti, E. E. Svanes, Moduli Stabilising in Heterotic Nearly K¨ ahler Com- pactifications, JHEP 1301 (2013) 015. 2

    2013

  38. [46]

    Larfors, A

    M. Larfors, A. Lukas, F. Ruehle, Calabi-Yau Manifolds and SU(3) Structure, JHEP 1901 (2019) 171. 7

    2019

  39. [47]

    Li, S.-T

    J. Li, S.-T. Yau, Hermitian-Yang-Mills connections on non-K¨ ahler manifolds, in: S.-T. Yau (Ed.), Math. Aspects of String Theory, World Scient. Publ., London, 1987, p. 560. 3

    1987

  40. [48]

    Li, S.-T

    J. Li, S.-T. Yau, The existence of supersymmetric string theory with torsion , J. Differential Geom. 70 (2005) 143-181. 2, 8

    2005

  41. [49]

    A. I. Malcev, On a class of homogeneous spaces , reprinted in Amer. Math. Soc. Translations, Series 1, 9 (1962), 276-307. 18

    1962

  42. [50]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, Non-K¨ ahler heterotic rotations, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 15 (2011) 131-174. 3, 15

    2011

  43. [51]

    de la Ossa, E

    X. de la Ossa, E. E. Svanes, Holomorphic Bundles and the Moduli Space of N=1 Heterotic Compact- ifications, JHEP 1410 (2014) 123. 2, 3

    2014

  44. [52]

    A. Otal, L. Ugarte, Six dimensional homogeneous spaces with holomorphically trivial canonical bun- dle, J. Geom. Phys. 194 (2023), Paper No. 105014, 27 pp. Addendum: J. Geom. Phys. 216 (2025), 105570. 3, 15, 18 21

    2023

  45. [53]

    A. Otal, L. Ugarte, R. Villacampa, Invariant solutions to the Strominger system and the heterotic equations of motion , Nucl. Phys. B920 (2017), 442–474. 15, 16, 17, 18

    2017

  46. [54]

    Papadopoulos, (2,0)-supersymmetric sigma models and almost complex structures , Nucl

    G. Papadopoulos, (2,0)-supersymmetric sigma models and almost complex structures , Nucl. Phys. B448 (1995), 199-219. 2

    1995

  47. [55]

    D. H. Phong, S. Picard, X. Zhang, Geometric flows and Strominger systems , Math. Z. 288 (2018), no. 1-2, 101-113. 2

    2018

  48. [56]

    D. H. Phong, S. Picard, X. Zhang, New curvature flows in complex geometry , Surveys in Differential Geometry 2017. Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Journal of Differential Geometry, 331-364, Surv. Differ. Geom., 22, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2018. 2

    2017

  49. [57]

    D. H. Phong, Geometric flows from unified string theories , Contribution to Surveys in Differen- tial Geometry, ”Forty Years of Ricci flow”, edited by H.D. Cao, R. Hamilton, and S.T. Yau, arXiv:2304.02533. 2

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Schoemann, Almost Hermitian structures with parallel torsion , J

    N. Schoemann, Almost Hermitian structures with parallel torsion , J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007), 2187-

    2007

  51. [59]

    Strominger, Superstrings With Torsion, Nucl

    A. Strominger, Superstrings With Torsion, Nucl. Phys. B274 (1986), 253-284. 2, 3, 6, 8

    1986

  52. [60]

    Yano, Differential geometry on complex and almost complex spaces

    K. Yano, Differential geometry on complex and almost complex spaces. International Series of Mono- graphs in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol 49, A Pergamon Press Book. 1965. 2

    1965

  53. [61]

    K. Yano, S. Bochner, Curvature and Betti Numbers, Ann. of Math. Studies 32, Princeton University Press, 1953. 14

    1953

  54. [62]

    Q. Zhao, F. Zheng, On Hermitian manifolds with Bismut-Strominger parallel torsion , arXiv:2208.03071. 3

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Q. Zhao, F. Zheng, Curvature characterization of Hermitian manifolds with Bismut parallel torsion , arXiv:2407.10497. 3, 15

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Q. Zhao, F. Zheng, On balanced Hermitian threefolds with parallel Bismut torsion, arXiv:2506.15141. 3, 15, 18 22

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.