Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 168 references

Mind the jumps: when 2BSDEs meet semi-martingales

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs one path-regularised process aggregating BSDE values under every probability, and proves it solves a second-order BSDE system with jump integrands indexed by the measure.

desk verdict A serious, honest paper that fixes real errors in the 2BSDE literature, but the advertised pure-jump/discrete-time scope is not delivered: a key assumption fails for a simple Poisson control generator. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01767 v1 pith:G6T3OR4M submitted 2025-07-02 math.PR math.OC

Dylan Possamaï , Marco Rodrigues , Alexandros Saplaouras This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.OC MSC 60H1060G4493E20
keywords second-orderBSDEssemi-martingalesjumpprocessesaggregationofvaluestochasticcontrolmodeluncertaintynonlinearexpectationsreflected
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to give a unified aggregation theorem for stochastic control problems whose payoff is the solution of a backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE) driven by a general semi-martingale with jumps. It builds a single path-regularised process $\hat{Y}^+$, obtained as the right limit along dyadic times of the pointwise supremum over probability measures of the BSDE values, and shows that for each measure $P$ this process coincides with the essential supremum of the BSDE values over all measures equal to $P$ on the current information. The central result is that $\hat{Y}^+$ carries a semi-martingale decomposition under every $P$ and that this decomposition is the unique solution of an extrinsic second-order BSDE (2BSDE) system. A key structural finding is that the jump integrands $(\hat{U}^P)_{P\in\mathcal P_0}$ must be indexed by the probability measure: unlike the diffusion integrand, they cannot in general be aggregated into a single process. If the construction is correct, 2BSDE techniques become available for controlled diffusions with jumps, pure-jump processes, and discrete-time processes under non-dominated model uncertainty.

What carries the argument

The central object is the path-regularised value function $\hat{Y}^+(T,\xi)$, defined as the right limit along dyadic times of $\hat{Y}_s(T,\xi):=\sup_{P\in\mathcal P(s,\omega)} E^P[Y^{s,\omega,P}_0((T-s\wedge T)^{s,\omega},\xi^{s,\omega})]$. Here a second-order BSDE (2BSDE) is a backward equation that must hold under a family of probability measures at once, with the second-order feature being the nonlinear dependence on the diffusion coefficient. The argument is carried by three mechanisms: measurable selection of semi-martingale characteristics in the probability parameter, a corrected down-crossing inequality for nonlinear super-martingales that yields the càdlàg regularisation, and the well-posedness of reflected BSDEs in weighted spaces, which produces the decomposition of $\hat{Y}^+$ into $(\hat{Z}, (\hat{U}^P, \hat{N}^P, \hat{K}^P)_{P\in\mathcal P_0})$. Uniqueness is enforced by the extrinsic condition (2B3), $\hat{Y}^+_t = \operatorname{ess\,sup}_{\bar P\in\mathcal P_0(G_{t+},P)} Y^{\bar P}_t(T,\xi)$, rather than by a minimality condition on $\hat{K}^P$, which only works under extra assumptions.

What would settle it

Test Assumption 3.3(iv) on a pure-jump generator: take $X$ Poisson-like and $f^P$ depending on $U$ through $\|U(\cdot)\|_{\hat L^2(K)}$, and attempt to exhibit $Y,Z,U,U'$ for which no $\rho^\dagger$ satisfies the cross-variation bound (3.12); if such a pair is found, the change-of-measure step in the proof of Theorem 3.5 cannot be run, so the aggregated 2BSDE solution need not exist for that generator class.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that the aggregated value process has a semi-martingale decomposition simultaneously under all measures, and that this decomposition is characterised as the unique solution of the extrinsic 2BSDE system. In its concrete form, for every $P\in\mathcal P_0$, $$\hat{Y}^+_t = \xi + \int_t^T f^P_r(\hat{Y}^+_r,\hat{Y}^+_{r-},\hat{Z}_r,\hat{U}^P_r(\cdot))\,dC_r - \left(\int_t^T \hat{Z}_r\,$dX^{{c,P}}$_r\right)^{(P)} - \left(\int_t^T\int_{\mathbb R^d} \hat{U}^P_r(x)\,\tilde{\mu}^{X,P}(dr,dx)\right)^{(P)} - \int_t^T d\hat{N}^P_r + \hat{K}^P_T - \hat{K}^P_t,\quad P\text{-a.s.}$$ with $\hat{K}^P$ non-decreasing and predictable, $\hat{N}^P$ orthogonal to the continuous local martingale part and the compensated jump measure, and $\hat{Z}$ a single integrand common to all $P$. The extrinsic system (2B1)-(2B3) uses the representation of $\hat{Y}^+$ as an essential supremum of the underlying BSDE values as its uniqueness condition; an intrinsic characterisation replaces that by a minimality condition on $\hat{K}^P$ under additional assumptions. The paper further argues that the family $(\hat{U}^P)_{P\in\mathcal P_0}$ cannot generally be collapsed to one integrand, and that the same obstruction persists when the BSDE is driven directly by a jumping martingale.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Assumption 3.3(iv): for every probability measure there must be one process $\rho^\dagger$ whose jumps never hit $-1$, whose quadratic variation is controlled by the reference clock $C$, and whose covariation with jump-integrator differences lower-bounds the generator's dependence on the jump integrand; if this single process does not exist, the linearisation and down-crossing argument that builds the regularised value function breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the hypotheses hold, the value process of a stochastic control problem with BSDE payoff and controlled semi-martingale characteristics is the first component of a unique 2BSDE solution, so 2BSDE well-posedness extends to controlled diffusions with jumps, pure-jump processes, and discrete-time processes.
  • Because the jump integrands stay indexed by $P$, a control that acts on the compensator of the jump measure will produce controls that depend on the probability law, so the usual worst-case-control interpretation fails in that regime; this is a direct consequence of the non-aggregation argument.
  • The path-regularised value process satisfies an invariance principle: shifting the path and restarting the system gives the solution of the 2BSDE with shifted data, which is a pathwise dynamic programming identity.
  • The corrected down-crossing lemma gives a sound path-regularisation step for nonlinear super-martingales in this generality, closing a gap in earlier arguments.
  • Norm estimates and a comparison principle for the 2BSDE solution follow from the same construction, giving stability of the value process in the data of the problem.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the non-aggregation claim is correct, applications that rely on measure-independent 2BSDE solutions, such as principal-agent contracting and superhedging under volatility and jump uncertainty, will need either a structural restriction on the generator or an explicitly law-dependent solution when jumps are present.
  • A direct stress test is to check Assumption 3.3(iv) for pure-jump generators, for example Poisson-driven generators depending on $\|U(\cdot)\|_{\hat L^2}$; the paper notes the reversed quantifier is crucial and gives no verification there, so a counterexample would delimit the theory.
  • The path-regularisation method may extend to aggregated reflected BSDEs on Skorokhod space, where the extrinsic condition would supply uniqueness without the minimality condition that fails for reflected problems.
  • Numerical implementations of these 2BSDEs would need to represent the whole family $P\mapsto \hat{U}^P$, a higher-dimensional object than a single integrand, suggesting approximation schemes based on parameterising the law set.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for second-order backward stochastic differential equations (2BSDEs) driven by general semimartingales with jumps on the canonical Skorokhod space. It constructs an aggregated value process from a family of BSDEs indexed by a set P0 of possibly non-dominated semimartingale laws, proves a path-regularisation result, derives a semimartingale decomposition via reflected BSDEs, and characterises the regularised value process as the unique solution of an extrinsic and an intrinsic 2BSDE system. The paper claims that the framework unifies controlled diffusions, pure-jump processes, and discrete-time processes, and it explicitly discusses why the integrands of stochastic integrals with respect to compensated jump measures cannot in general be aggregated across the probability measures.

Significance. If the central construction is correct, this would be a substantial contribution: it would extend the 2BSDE theory well beyond the Brownian and Brownian--Poisson settings, provide a time-consistent system of fully nonlinear conditional expectations on the Skorokhod space, and correct known gaps in earlier down-crossing and aggregation arguments. The paper is unusually careful in its proofs: Section 7 and Appendices A--C contain detailed arguments, and Remark 7.9 explicitly identifies and repairs an erroneous application of Doob's down-crossing inequality in [141, Lemma 3.2]. The sharp discussion of the non-aggregation of jump integrands, including the criticism of claims in [85] and [47], is also valuable. However, the advertised pure-jump and discrete-time scope is not established, because a central assumption used in the path-regularisation proof fails for a natural pure-jump weak-control generator.

major comments (3)
  1. [Assumption 3.3(iv), Remark 3.4(iii), and Theorem 3.5(i)] Assumption 3.3(iv) is load-bearing for the entire construction: in the proof of Theorem 3.5(i) (Section 7.2, around Eq. (7.17)--(7.19)), the existence of a single process rho-dagger with a uniform lower bound on generator differences is used to build the equivalent measures that make the down-crossing argument work. The assumption is not merely unverified; it fails for a standard pure-jump Lipschitz generator. Take d=1, C_t=t, and let P be the law of a compensated Poisson process with compensator dt delta_1(dx). Let f^P(y,y-,z,u) = inf_{alpha in [0,1]} int_{R} u(x)(alpha-1) delta_1(dx) = -u(1)^+. This generator is 1-Lipschitz in the relevant \hat L^2 norm and independent of (y,z), so it satisfies the other structural assumptions. If Assumption 3.3(iv) held, there would exist a predictable rho-dagger with rho-dagger(t,1) > -1 on the jump times (from Delta(rho-dagger * tilde-mu^{X,P}) > -1) and, since dC=dt, with the required lower bound reducing to f(U)-f(U') >= rho-dagger(1)(U(1)-U'(1)) for all U,U'. Choosing U=1_{x=1} and U'=0 gives -1 >= rho-dagger(1), contradicting rho-dagger(1) > -1. Thus no such rho-dagger exists. Consequently, the measure-change/down-crossing proof of Theorem 3.5(i) cannot be run for this generator, and the claimed unified treatment of pure-jump processes in Theorem 3.13 is not obtained. The paper notes in Remark 3.4(iii) that the reversed quantifiers are crucial, but it supplies no verification for any pure-jump or discrete-time class; the example above shows the condition is not a harmless technical restriction.
  2. [Assumption 3.16(i) and Theorem 3.20] The intrinsic characterisation relies on the same type of existential condition in Assumption 3.16(i), which requires a pair (rho_1,rho_2) of integrands satisfying two-sided cross-variation bounds for all Y,Z,U,U'. The same Poisson-control generator f^P(y,y-,z,u)=-u(1)^+ shows this assumption also fails: taking U=1_{x=1} and U'=0, the lower bound f(U)-f(U') >= d<rho_1 * tilde-mu, (U-U') * tilde-mu>/dC = rho_1(1) together with Delta(rho_1 * tilde-mu) > -1 gives the contradiction -1 >= rho_1(1) > -1. Hence Theorem 3.20 is not available for this natural pure-jump generator either.
  3. [Introduction and Section 5.2] The paper's stated goal of a unified treatment of 'controlled diffusions, pure-jump processes, and discrete-time processes' is not supported by the results as they stand. Section 5.2 suggests that extending the framework to other decompositions of X would involve only technical challenges, but the failure of Assumption 3.3(iv) for the elementary pure-jump generator above is a substantive obstacle, not a mere technicality. The authors should either prove that a nontrivial class of pure-jump or discrete-time generators satisfies Assumption 3.3(iv), or explicitly restrict the main theorems to a class for which the condition can be verified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 3.20(i)] The intersection '\bigcap_{\beta'(0,\hat\beta)}' is missing the membership symbol; it should read '\bigcap_{\beta'\in(0,\hat\beta)}'.
  2. [Section 2.4, display before (2.5)] The definition of the stochastic exponential E(\hat\beta A)_r uses the convention an integral over (0,r], but the factor '(T-s\wedge T)^{s,\omega}' appears in the integrability condition in Assumption 2.20(iv) without clear bracketing; please clarify the intended stopping time in that display.
  3. [Section 7.2, proof of Theorem 3.5(ii)] In the displayed equation following (7.24), the expression 'E(\hat\beta A)^{1/2}_{t\wedge T}/E(\hat\beta A)^{1/2}_{t_n\wedge T}' is written with inconsistent placement of the exponent; this should be cleaned up to avoid confusion.
  4. [Throughout] There are several small typographical issues, such as 'P0–q.s.' and 'Theorem 2.5' being used where 'Remark 2.5' is meant, and the notation 'L^2_{T,\beta}(P0)' in Section 3.4 is used before the space is formally introduced. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected in a revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained, and the extrinsic (2B3) condition is a stated characterization property rather than a hidden fit or imported conclusion.

full rationale

The paper does not exhibit a circular derivation. The value process is defined as a supremum of solutions to the auxiliary BSDE family, and the substantive result is that its path regularisation admits a semi-martingale decomposition (Theorem 3.10) and satisfies the extrinsic 2BSDE system (Theorem 3.13). The decomposition is obtained by applying the well-posedness theory of reflected BSDEs from the authors' prior work [137], together with new stability and comparison results developed in Appendix C; these are used as subroutines and are not assumptions of the target 2BSDE result. The extrinsic condition (2B3) restates the aggregation property by design: the paper explicitly defines the extrinsic system as one containing the auxiliary BSDE solutions Y^P(T,xi), so the equality of the Y-component with their supremum is a characterization condition rather than a fitted input presented as a prediction. The intrinsic system likewise derives its minimality condition (2B3*) instead of assuming it. Citations to [107], [115], [137], and [141] are to published, independently argued results; notably, the paper corrects a gap in [141, Lemma 3.2] and in [19, Lemma A.1], which indicates that the dependence on prior work is not a mere appeal to authority. The skeptical objection that Assumption 3.3(iv) may fail for certain pure-jump generators concerns the verification of a stated hypothesis, not the circularity of the derivation. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a thick layer of imported machinery from the authors' own prior work ([137] for BSDE and reflected-BSDE well-posedness, [107] for measurable characteristics, [115]/[141] for the regularization program), plus explicit assumptions (2.12, 2.17, 2.20, 3.3, 3.16) that are stated, not derived. There are no data-fitted parameters, but the existence constants rho^dag, rho_1, rho_2 in Assumptions 3.3(iv) and 3.16(i) function as ad hoc inputs to make the comparison and regularization machinery run. The cost is paid upstream, which is normal for this field, but it means the advertised applicability to pure-jump and discrete-time control problems is not demonstrated at the level of checking the assumptions.

free parameters (3)
  • beta (weight-space exponent) = any beta in (beta_star, beta_hat) with P[E(beta A)_{T-} < inf] = 1 for all P in P0
    Hand-chosen weight in the weighted L2 spaces of Section 2.4. The main theorems hold for an arbitrary such beta; it is a technical knob constrained by the smallness condition M_1^Phi(beta_hat) < 1, not fitted to data.
  • Phi (upper bound on jumps of A) = Phi in [0,1) with Delta A <= Phi (Assumption 2.20(v))
    Input assumption controlling the size of the jumps of the clock process A = integral alpha^2 dC, so that the stochastic exponential E(beta A) is well behaved. Not fitted to data.
  • delta, Theta (intrinsic system constants) = existence only (Assumption 3.16(i))
    Introduced ad hoc for the intrinsic characterization: for every Y, Z, U, U' there must exist rho_1, rho_2 with Theta >= Delta(rho_i * mu-tilde) > -1 + delta and prescribed cross-variation bounds. No admissible values or construction are given, and the paper itself notes the condition is awkward (Remark 3.17).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standing assumption 2.12: under every P, the characteristics (B^P, C^P, nu^P) are absolutely continuous with respect to a fixed non-decreasing predictable process C.
    All BSDE and 2BSDE dynamics are integrated against dC; processes whose characteristics are not dominated by a common clock C are outside the framework. Introduced in Section 2.3.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.17: the family P(s,omega) is analytic and stable under conditioning and pasting.
    Inherited from Nutz and van Handel [115] and Neufeld and Nutz [107]; required for the measurable-selection argument in Theorem 3.1 and for the dynamic programming equalities (Theorem 7.4).
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.20(v): the smallness condition ~M_1^Phi(beta_hat) < 1, with Delta A <= Phi.
    Imported from Possamai and Rodrigues [137, Section 3.2] to guarantee existence and uniqueness of the underlying BSDEs in the weighted spaces; the paper reproves the stability results it needs in Section C, but the smallness threshold itself is taken from [137].
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3.3(i)-(iv): existence of lambda, rho, rho^dag making generator differences comparable to linear and cross-variation terms.
    Load-bearing for the nonlinear supermartingale and down-crossing argument (Theorem 3.5(i)) and the comparison principle. The reversed quantifier order in (iv) is flagged as crucial (Remark 3.4(iii)); no verification is given for pure-jump or discrete-time generators.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3.16(i)-(iv): two-sided comparison processes plus quasi-left-continuity of X under every P in P0.
    Sufficient conditions for the intrinsic 2BSDE characterization (Theorem 3.20). Item (iv) excludes processes with jumps at predictable times, so discrete-time processes are not covered by the intrinsic system; the paper's abstract does not state this restriction.
  • standard math Standard stochastic calculus: Doob-Meyer decomposition, predictable quadratic variation, martingale representation for cadlag martingales, Skorokhod topology, Jankov-von Neumann measurable selection.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 7; the paper cites von Weizsacker and Winkler [162], Dellacherie and Meyer [43;44], Jacod and Shiryaev [80], and Neufeld and Nutz [107].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mind the jumps: when 2BSDEs meet semi-martingales." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G6T3OR4M

@misc{pith2026250701767,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mind the jumps: when 2BSDEs meet semi-martingales},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G6T3OR4M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01767}
}
read the original abstract

We construct an aggregated version of the value processes associated with stochastic control problems, where the criterion to optimise is given by solutions to semi-martingale backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs). The results can be applied to control problems where the triplet of semi-martingale characteristics is controlled in a possibly non-dominated case or where uncertainty about the characteristics is present in the optimisation. The construction also provides a time-consistent system of fully nonlinear conditional expectations on the Skorokhod space. We find the semi-martingale decomposition of the value function and characterise it as the solution to a semi-martingale second-order BSDE. The generality we seek allows for the treatment of controlled diffusions, pure-jump processes, and discrete-time processes in a unified setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

168 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [141]

    Possamaï, X

    D. Possamaï, X. Tan, and C. Zhou. Stochastic control for a class of nonlinear kernels and applications.The Annals of Probability, 46 (1):551–603, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [19]

    Bouchard, D

    B. Bouchard, D. Possamaï, and X. Tan. A general Doob–Meyer–Mertens decomposition forg-supermartingale systems.Electronic Journal of Probability, 21(36):1–21, 2016

    2016

  3. [85]

    Kazi-Tani, D

    N. Kazi-Tani, D. Possamaï, and C. Zhou. Second order BSDEs with jumps: existence and probabilistic representation for fully- nonlinear PIDEs.Electronic Journal of Probability, 20(65):1–31, 2015

    2015

  4. [47]

    Denis, A

    L. Denis, A. Matoussi, and C. Zhou. Second order BSDEs with jumps by measurable selection argument.HAL preprint hal-04822047, 2024

    2024

  5. [1]

    R. Aïd, D. Possamaï, and N. Touzi. Optimal electricity demand response contracting with responsiveness incentives.Mathematics of Operations Research, 47(3):2112–2137, 2022

    2022

  6. [2]

    R. Aïd, A. Kemper, and N. Touzi. A principal–agent framework for optimal incentives in renewable investments.ArXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12167, 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [3]

    Aliprantis and K

    C.D. Aliprantis and K. Border.Infinite dimensional analysis: a hitchhiker’s guide. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 3rd edition, 2006

    2006

  8. [4]

    Arkin and M.T

    V.I. Arkin and M.T. Saksonov. Necessary conditions of optimality in the problems of control of stochastic differential equations. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 244(1):11–15, 1979

    1979

Show all 168 references
  1. [5]

    Baldacci and D

    B. Baldacci and D. Possamaï. Governmental incentives for green bonds investment.Mathematics and Financial Economics, 16: 539–585, 2022

    2022

  2. [6]

    Barrasso and N

    A. Barrasso and N. Touzi. Controlled diffusion mean field games with common noise, and McKean–Vlasov second order backward SDEs.Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 66(4):613–639, 2022

    2022

  3. [7]

    D. Bartl. Conditional nonlinear expectations.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(2):785–805, 2020

    2020

  4. [8]

    Bauer.Probability theory, volume 23 ofDe Gruyter studies in mathematics

    H. Bauer.Probability theory, volume 23 ofDe Gruyter studies in mathematics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1996

    1996

  5. [9]

    C. Beck, W. E, and A. Jentzen. Machine learning approximation algorithms for high-dimensional fully nonlinear partial differential equations and second-order backward stochastic differential equations.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29(4):1563–1619, 2019

    2019

  6. [10]

    Bensoussan

    A. Bensoussan. Lectures on stochastic control. In S.K. Mitter and A. Moro, editors,Nonlinear filtering and stochastic control, proceedings of the 3rd 1981 session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo(C.I.M.E.), held at Cortona, July 1–10, 1981, volume 972 ofLecture n...

    1981

  7. [11]

    Bensoussan

    A. Bensoussan. Maximum principle and dynamic programming approaches of the optimal control of partially observed diffusions. Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 9(3):169–222, 1983

    1983

  8. [12]

    Bertsekas and S.E

    D.P. Bertsekas and S.E. Shreve.Stochastic optimal control: the discrete time case, volume 139 ofMathematics in science and engineering. Academic Press New York, 1978

    1978

  9. [13]

    Bismut.Analyse convexe et probabilités

    J.-M. Bismut.Analyse convexe et probabilités. PhD thesis, Faculté des sciences de Paris, 1973

    1973

  10. [14]

    J.-M. Bismut. Conjugate convex functions in optimal stochastic control.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 44(2): 384–404, 1973

    1973

  11. [15]

    J.-M. Bismut. Contrôle des systèmes linéaires quadratiques : applications de l’intégrale stochastique.Séminaire de probabilités de Strasbourg, XII:180–264, 1978

    1978

  12. [16]

    J.-M. Bismut. An introductory approach to duality in optimal stochastic control.SIAM Review, 20(1):62–78, 1978

    1978

  13. [17]

    Bogachev.Measure theory

    V.I. Bogachev.Measure theory. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007

    2007

  14. [18]

    Bouchard and X

    B. Bouchard and X. Tan. Understanding the dual formulation for the hedging of path-dependent options with price impact.The Annals of Applied Probability, 32(3):1705–1733, 2022

    2022

  15. [20]

    Bouchard, G

    B. Bouchard, G. Loeper, H.M. Soner, and C. Zhou. Second-order stochastic target problems with generalized market impact.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 57(6):4125–4149, 2019

    2019

  16. [21]

    Buckdahn and Y

    R. Buckdahn and Y. Hu. Probabilistic interpretation of a coupled system of Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations.Journal of Evolution Equations, 10:529–549, 2010. 100

    2010

  17. [22]

    Çınlar.Probability and stochastics, volume 261 ofGraduate texts in mathematics

    E. Çınlar.Probability and stochastics, volume 261 ofGraduate texts in mathematics. Springer, New York, 2011

    2011

  18. [23]

    Chen.G–Doob–Meyer decomposition and its applications in bid–ask pricing for derivatives under Knightian uncertainty.Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2015(1):910809, 2015

    W. Chen.G–Doob–Meyer decomposition and its applications in bid–ask pricing for derivatives under Knightian uncertainty.Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2015(1):910809, 2015

    2015

  19. [24]

    Chen and S

    Z. Chen and S. Peng. A general downcrossing inequality forg-martingales.Statistics & Probability Letters, 46(2):169–175, 2000

    2000

  20. [25]

    Chen and S

    Z. Chen and S. Peng. Continuous properties ofg-martingales.Chinese Annals of Mathematics, 22(1):115–128, 2001

    2001

  21. [26]

    Cheridito, H.M

    P. Cheridito, H.M. Soner, N. Touzi, and N. Victoir. Second-order backward stochastic differential equations and fully nonlinear parabolic PDEs.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 60(7):1081–1110, 2007

    2007

  22. [27]

    Chitashvili

    R.J. Chitashvili. Martingale ideology in the theory of controlled stochastic processes. In J.V. Prokhorov and K. Itô, editors,Probability theory and mathematical statistics. Proceedings of the fourth USSR–Japan symposium, held at Tbilisi, USSR, August 23–29, 1982, volume 1021 ...

    1982

  23. [28]

    Chitashvili and M.G

    R.J. Chitashvili and M.G. Mania. Optimal locally absolutely continuous change of measure. Finite set of decisions. Part I.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 21(2):131–185, 1987

    1987

  24. [29]

    R.J.ChitashviliandM.G.Mania. Optimallocallyabsolutelycontinuouschangeofmeasure.Finitesetofdecisions.PartII:optimization problems.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 21(3):187–229, 1987

    1987

  25. [30]

    Chiusolo and E

    A. Chiusolo and E. Hubert. A new approach to principal–agent problems with volatility control.ArXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09471, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [31]

    S.N. Cohen. Quasi-sure analysis, aggregation and dual representations of sublinear expectations in general spaces.Electronic Journal of Probability, 17(62):1–15, 2012

    2012

  27. [32]

    Cohen and R.J

    S.N. Cohen and R.J. Elliott. Existence, uniqueness and comparisons for BSDEs in general spaces.The Annals of Probability, 40(5): 2264–2297, 2012

    2012

  28. [33]

    Cohn.Measure theory

    D.L. Cohn.Measure theory. Birkhäuser advanced texts. Birkhäuser New York, NY, 2nd edition, 2013

    2013

  29. [34]

    Confortola and M

    F. Confortola and M. Fuhrman. Backward stochastic differential equations and optimal control of marked point processes.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 51(5):3592–3623, 2013

    2013

  30. [35]

    Confortola, M

    F. Confortola, M. Fuhrman, and J. Jacod. Backward stochastic differential equation driven by a marked point process: an elementary approach with an application to optimal control.The Annals of Applied Probability, 26(3):1743–1773, 2016

    2016

  31. [36]

    Cvitanić and H

    J. Cvitanić and H. Xing. Asset pricing under optimal contracts.Journal of Economic Theory, 173:142–180, 2018

    2018

  32. [37]

    Cvitanić, D

    J. Cvitanić, D. Possamaï, and N. Touzi. Moral hazard in dynamic risk management.Management Science, 63(10):3328–3346, 2017

    2017

  33. [38]

    Cvitanić, D

    J. Cvitanić, D. Possamaï, and N. Touzi. Dynamic programming approach to principal–agent problems.Finance and Stochastics, 22 (1):1–37, 2018

    2018

  34. [39]

    Dakaou and A

    I. Dakaou and A. Soumana Hima. Large deviations for backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 34(2):499–521, 2021

    2021

  35. [40]

    Darrell and L.G

    D. Darrell and L.G. Epstein. Stochastic differential utility.Econometrica, 60(2):353–394, 1992

    1992

  36. [41]

    Davis and P

    M.H.A. Davis and P. Varaiya. Dynamic programming conditions for partially observable stochastic systems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 11(2):226–261, 1973

    1973

  37. [42]

    Dellacherie

    C. Dellacherie. Quelques applications du lemme de Borel–Cantelli à la théorie des semimartingales.Séminaire de probabilités de Strasbourg, XII:742–745, 1978

    1978

  38. [43]

    Dellacherie and P.-A

    C. Dellacherie and P.-A. Meyer.Probabilities and potential, volume 29 ofMathematics studies. North-Holland, 1978

    1978

  39. [44]

    Dellacherie and P.-A

    C. Dellacherie and P.-A. Meyer.Probabilities and potential B: theory of martingales. North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Elsevier Science, 1982

    1982

  40. [45]

    Denis and C

    L. Denis and C. Martini. A theoretical framework for the pricing of contingent claims in the presence of model uncertainty.The Annals of Applied Probability, 16(2):827–852, 2006

    2006

  41. [46]

    Denis, M

    L. Denis, M. Hu, and S. Peng. Function spaces and capacity related to a sublinear expectation: application toG–Brownian motion paths.Potential Analysis, 34(2):139–161, 2011

    2011

  42. [48]

    Dolinsky, M

    Y. Dolinsky, M. Nutz, and H.M. Soner. Weak approximation ofG-expectations.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 122(2): 664–675, 2012. 101

    2012

  43. [49]

    Springer, 1984

    J.L.Doob.Classical potential theory and its probabilistic counterpart, volume262ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, 1984

    1984

  44. [50]

    Doob.Measure theory, volume 143 ofGraduate texts in mathematics

    J.L. Doob.Measure theory, volume 143 ofGraduate texts in mathematics. Springer New York, NY, 1994

    1994

  45. [51]

    El Karoui and X

    N. El Karoui and X. Tan. Capacities, measurable selection and dynamic programming part I: abstract framework. Technical report, École Polytechnique and université Paris-Dauphine, 2013

    2013

  46. [52]

    El Karoui and X

    N. El Karoui and X. Tan. Capacities, measurable selection and dynamic programming part II: application in stochastic control problems. Technical report, École Polytechnique and université Paris-Dauphine, 2013

    2013

  47. [53]

    El Karoui, C

    N. El Karoui, C. Kapoudjian, É. Pardoux, S. Peng, and M.-C. Quenez. Reflected solutions of backward SDE’s, and related obstacle problems for PDE’s.The Annals of Probability, 25(2):702–737, 1997

    1997

  48. [54]

    El Karoui, É

    N. El Karoui, É. Pardoux, and M.-C. Quenez. Reflected backward SDEs and American options. In L.C.G. Rogers and D. Talay, editors,Numerical methods in finance, pages 215–231. Cambridge University Press, 1997

    1997

  49. [55]

    El Karoui, S

    N. El Karoui, S. Peng, and M.-C. Quenez. Backward stochastic differential equations in finance.Mathematical Finance, 7(1):1–71, 1997

    1997

  50. [56]

    R. Élie, E. Hubert, T. Mastrolia, and D. Possamaï. Mean-field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management. Mathematical Finance, 31(1):399–473, 2021

    2021

  51. [57]

    Elstrodt.Maß- und Integrationstheorie

    J. Elstrodt.Maß- und Integrationstheorie. Springer Spektrum Berlin, Heidelberg, 8th edition, 2018

    2018

  52. [58]

    Fabre.Some contributions to stochastic control and backward stochastic differential equations in finance.PhD thesis, École Polytechnique, 2012

    É. Fabre.Some contributions to stochastic control and backward stochastic differential equations in finance.PhD thesis, École Polytechnique, 2012

    2012

  53. [59]

    Gennaro and T

    A. Gennaro and T. Mastrolia. 2BSDE with uncertain horizon and application to stochastic control in erratic environments.ArXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15037, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Grigorova, P

    M. Grigorova, P. Imkeller, Y. Ouknine, and M.-C. Quenez. Optimal stopping withf-expectations: the irregular case.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(3):1258–1288, 2020

    2020

  55. [61]

    Haussmann

    U.G. Haussmann. General necessary conditions for optimal control of stochastic systems. In R.J.-B. Wets, editor,Stochastic sys- tems: modeling, identification and optimization, II, volume 6 ofMathematical programming studies, pages 30–48. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1976

    1976

  56. [62]

    S. He, J. Wang, and J.A. Yan.Semimartingale theory and stochastic calculus. Science Press, 1992

    1992

  57. [63]

    He and H

    W. He and H. Li. Mean reflected backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion with double constraints. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09103, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  58. [64]

    Hernández and D

    C. Hernández and D. Possamaï. Me, myself and I: a general theory of non-Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control for sophis- ticated agents.The Annals of Applied Probability, 33(2):1396–1458, 2023

    2023

  59. [65]

    Hernández, N

    C. Hernández, N. Hernández Santibáñez, E. Hubert, and D. Possamaï. Closed-loop equilibria for Stackelberg games: it’s all about stochastic targets.ArXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19607, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Hernández Santibáñez and T

    N. Hernández Santibáñez and T. Mastrolia. Contract theory in a VUCA world.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 57(4): 3072–3100, 2019

    2019

  61. [67]

    Hu and S

    M. Hu and S. Ji. Dynamic programming principle for stochastic recursive optimal control problem driven by aG–Brownian motion. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 127(1):107–134, 2017

    2017

  62. [68]

    Hu and S

    M. Hu and S. Peng.G–Lévy processes under sublinear expectations.Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 6(1):1–22, 2021

    2021

  63. [69]

    Hu and F

    M. Hu and F. Wang. Ergodic BSDEs driven byG–Brownian motion and applications.Stochastics and Dynamics, 18(06):1850050, 2018

    2018

  64. [70]

    Hu and F

    M. Hu and F. Wang. Stochastic optimal control problem with infinite horizon driven byG–Brownian motion.ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 24(2):873–899, 2018

    2018

  65. [71]

    M. Hu, S. Ji, S. Peng, and Y. Song. Backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 124(1):759–784, 2014

    2014

  66. [72]

    M. Hu, S. Ji, S. Peng, and Y. Song. Comparison theorem, Feynman–Kac formula and Girsanov transformation for BSDEs driven by G-Brownian motion.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 124(2):1170–1195, 2014

    2014

  67. [73]

    M. Hu, B. Qu, and F. Wang. BSDEs driven byG–Brownian motion with time-varying Lipschitz condition.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 491(2):124342, 2020. 102

    2020

  68. [74]

    M. Hu, S. Ji, and X. Li. BSDEs driven byG–Brownian motion under degenerate case and its application to the regularity of fully nonlinear PDEs.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 377:3287–3323, 2024

    2024

  69. [75]

    Y. Hu, Y. Lin, and A. Soumana Hima. Quadratic backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion: discrete solutions and approximation.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 128(11):3724–3750, 2018

    2018

  70. [76]

    Y. Hu, S. Tang, and F. Wang. QuadraticG-BSDEs with convex generators and unbounded terminal conditions.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 153:363–390, 2022

    2022

  71. [77]

    Hu and Z.-L

    Z.-C. Hu and Z.-L. Wang. Jensen’s inequality for backward SDEs driven byG–Brownian motion.Archiv der Mathematik, 104(5): 491–500, 2015

    2015

  72. [78]

    E. Hubert. Continuous-time incentives in hierarchies.Finance and Stochastics, 27:605–661, 2023

    2023

  73. [79]

    Jacod.Calcul stochastique et problèmes de martingales, volume 714 ofLecture notes in mathematics

    J. Jacod.Calcul stochastique et problèmes de martingales, volume 714 ofLecture notes in mathematics. Springer, 1979

    1979

  74. [80]

    Jacod and A.N

    J. Jacod and A.N. Shiryaev.Limit theorems for stochastic processes, volume 288 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2003

    2003

  75. [81]

    Yu.M. Kabanov. On the Pontryiagin maximum principle for the linear stochastic differential equations. InProbabilistic models and control of economic processes. TsEMI akademii nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1978

    1978

  76. [82]

    Kallenberg.Foundations of modern probability, volume 99 ofProbability theory and stochastic modelling

    O. Kallenberg.Foundations of modern probability, volume 99 ofProbability theory and stochastic modelling. Springer, Cham, 3rd edition, 2021

    2021

  77. [83]

    Karandikar

    R.L. Karandikar. On pathwise stochastic integration.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 57(1):11–18, 1995

    1995

  78. [84]

    Kazi-Tani, D

    N. Kazi-Tani, D. Possamaï, and C. Zhou. Second-order BSDEs with jumps: formulation and uniqueness.The Annals of Applied Probability, 25(5):2867–2908, 2015

    2015

  79. [86]

    H.J. Kushner. Necessary conditions for continuous parameter stochastic optimization problems.SIAM Journal on Control, 10(3): 550–565, 1972

    1972

  80. [87]

    Le Gall.Brownian motion, martingales, and stochastic calculus, volume 274 ofGraduate texts in mathematics

    J.-F. Le Gall.Brownian motion, martingales, and stochastic calculus, volume 274 ofGraduate texts in mathematics. Springer Cham, 2016

    2016

  81. [88]

    Lépingle and J

    D. Lépingle and J. Mémin. Intégrabilité uniforme et danslr des martingales exponentielles.Publications des séminaires de mathé- matiques et informatique de Rennes, 1:1–14, 1978

    1978

  82. [89]

    H. Li. Doubly reflected backward SDEs driven byG–Brownian motion—a monotone approach.ArXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09973, 2020

    2008 arXiv

  83. [90]

    H. Li. Reflected BSDEs driven byG–Brownian motion with non-Lipschitz coefficients.ArXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12108, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Li and G

    H. Li and G. Liu. Multi-dimensional reflected backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion with diagonal generators.Journal of Theoretical Probability, 37(3):2615–2645, 2024

    2024

  85. [92]

    H. Li, S. Peng, and A. Soumana Hima. Reflected solutions of backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion. Science China Mathematics, 61(1):1–26, 2018

    2018

  86. [93]

    Li and S

    L. Li and S. Peng. Reflected backward stochastic differential equation driven byG–Brownian motion with an upper obstacle.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(11):6556–6579, 2020

    2020

  87. [94]

    Q.Q. Lin. Nonlinear Doob–Meyer decomposition with jumps.Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 19(1):69–78, 2003

    2003

  88. [95]

    Y. Lin. A new existence result for second-order BSDEs with quadratic growth and their applications.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 88(1):128–146, 2016

    2016

  89. [96]

    Y. Lin, Z. Ren, N. Touzi, and J. Yang. Second order backward SDE with random terminal time.Electronic Journal of Probability, 25(99):1–43, 2020

    2020

  90. [97]

    Y. Lin, Z. Ren, N. Touzi, and J. Yang. Random horizon principal–agent problem.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 60 (1):355–384, 2022

    2022

  91. [98]

    G. Liu. Multi-dimensional BSDEs driven byG–Brownian motion and related system of fully nonlinear PDEs.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 92(5):659–683, 2019

    2019

  92. [99]

    Liu and F

    G. Liu and F. Wang. BSDEs with mean reflection driven byG–Brownian motion.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 470(1):599–618, 2019. 103

    2019

  93. [100]

    Mastrolia and D

    T. Mastrolia and D. Possamaï. Moral hazard under ambiguity.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 179(2):452–500, 2018

    2018

  94. [101]

    Matoussi, D

    A. Matoussi, D. Possamaï, and C. Zhou. Second order reflected backward stochastic differential equations.The Annals of Applied Probability, 23(6):2420–2457, 2013

    2013

  95. [102]

    Matoussi, L

    A. Matoussi, L. Piozin, and D. Possamaï. Second-order BSDEs with general reflection and game options under uncertainty.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 124(7):2281–2321, 2014

    2014

  96. [103]

    Matoussi, D

    A. Matoussi, D. Possamaï, and C. Zhou. Robust utility maximization in nondominated models with 2BSDE: the uncertain volatility model.Mathematical Finance, 25(2):258–287, 2015

    2015

  97. [104]

    Matoussi, D

    A. Matoussi, D. Possamaï, and W. Sabbagh. Probabilistic interpretation for solutions of fully nonlinear stochastic PDEs.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 174(1–2):177–233, 2019

    2019

  98. [105]

    Second-order reflected backward stochastic differential equations

    A. Matoussi, D. Possamaï, and C. Zhou. Corrigendum for “Second-order reflected backward stochastic differential equations”and “Second-order BSDEs with general reflection and game options under uncertainty”.The Annals of Applied Probability, 31(3):1505– 1522, 2021

    2021

  99. [106]

    Neufeld and M

    A. Neufeld and M. Nutz. Superreplication under volatility uncertainty for measurable claims.Electronic Journal of Probability, 18 (48):1–14, 2013

    2013

  100. [107]

    Neufeld and M

    A. Neufeld and M. Nutz. Measurability of semimartingale characteristics with respect to the probability law.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 124(11):3819–3845, 2014

    2014

  101. [108]

    Neufeld and M

    A. Neufeld and M. Nutz. Nonlinear Lévy processes and their characteristics.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 369(1):69–95, 2017

    2017

  102. [109]

    Neveu.Discrete-parameter martingales, volume 10

    J. Neveu.Discrete-parameter martingales, volume 10. North Holland, 1975

    1975

  103. [110]

    Noubiagain.Contribution aux équations différentielles stochastiques rétrogrades réfléchies du second ordre

    F. Noubiagain.Contribution aux équations différentielles stochastiques rétrogrades réfléchies du second ordre. PhD thesis, Université du Maine and Université Bretagne Loire, 2017

    2017

  104. [111]

    M. Nutz. A quasi-sure approach to the control of non-Markovian stochastic differential equations.Electronic Journal of Probability, 17(23):1–23, 2012

    2012

  105. [112]

    M. Nutz. RandomG-expectations.The Annals of Applied Probability, 23(5):1755–1777, 2013

    2013

  106. [113]

    M. Nutz. Robust superhedging with jumps and diffusion.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 125(12):4543–4555, 2015

    2015

  107. [114]

    Nutz and H.M

    M. Nutz and H.M. Soner. Superhedging and dynamic risk measures under volatility uncertainty.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 50(4):2065–2089, 2012

    2012

  108. [115]

    Nutz and R

    M. Nutz and R. van Handel. Constructing sublinear expectations on path space.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 123(8): 3100–3121, 2013

    2013

  109. [116]

    H. O, M.-C. Kim, and C.-G. Pak. Representation of solutions to 2BSDEs in an extended monotonicity setting.Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques, 164(102907):1–25, 2020

    2020

  110. [117]

    H. O, M.-C. Kim, and K.-G. Kim. Wellposedness of second order reflected BSDEs: a new formulation.ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 28:1–21, 2024

    2024

  111. [118]

    Paczka.G-martingale representation in theG-Lévy setting

    K. Paczka.G-martingale representation in theG-Lévy setting. Technical report, University of Oslo, 2014

    2014

  112. [119]

    K. Paczka. Itô calculus and jump diffusions forG–Lévy processes. Technical report, University of Oslo, 2014

    2014

  113. [120]

    Pak, H.-J

    C.-G. Pak, H.-J. Hwang, and M.-C. Kim. A nonequidistant multistep scheme for second order backward stochastic differential equations with applications to stochastic optimal control.International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 11(58): 1–19, 2025

    2025

  114. [121]

    Papapantoleon, D

    A. Papapantoleon, D. Possamaï, and A. Saplaouras. Existence and uniqueness for BSDEs with jumps: the whole nine yards.Electronic Journal of Probability, 23(121):1–68, 2018

    2018

  115. [122]

    Papapantoleon, D

    A. Papapantoleon, D. Possamaï, and A. Saplaouras. Stability of backward stochastic differential equations: the general Lipschitz case. Electronic Journal of Probability, 28(51):1–56, 2023

    2023

  116. [123]

    Pardoux and S

    É. Pardoux and S. Peng. Adapted solution of a backward stochastic differential equation.System and Control Letters, 14(1):55–61, 1990

    1990

  117. [124]

    Pardoux and S

    É. Pardoux and S. Peng. Backward stochastic differential equations and quasilinear parabolic partial differential equations. In B.L. Rozovskii and R.B. Sowers, editors,Stochastic partial differential equations and their applications. Proceedings of IFIP WG 7/1 international co...

    1991

  118. [125]

    Pardoux and S

    É. Pardoux and S. Tang. Forward–backward stochastic differential equations and quasilinear parabolic PDEs.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 114(2):123–150, 1999

    1999

  119. [126]

    Pardoux, F

    É. Pardoux, F. Pradeilles, and Z. Rao. Probabilistic interpretation of a system of semi-linear parabolic partial differential equations. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques(B), 33(4):467–490, 1997

    1997

  120. [127]

    S. Peng. A generalized dynamic programming principle and Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 38(2):119–134, 1992

    1992

  121. [128]

    S. Peng. Monotonic limit theorem of BSDE and nonlinear decomposition theorem of Doob–Meyer’s type.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 113(4):473–499, 1999

    1999

  122. [129]

    Peng.G-expectation,G–Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus of Itô type

    S. Peng.G-expectation,G–Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus of Itô type. In F.E. Benth, G. di Nunno, T. Lindstrøm, B. Øksendal, and T. Zhang, editors,Stochastic analysis and applications. The Abel symposium 2005, volume 2 ofAbel Symposia, pages 541–567. Springer, 2007

    2005

  123. [130]

    S. Peng. Multi-dimensionalG–Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus underG-expectation.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 118(12):2223–2253, 2008

    2008

  124. [131]

    Peng.Nonlinear expectations and stochastic calculus under uncertainty: with robust CLT andG–Brownian motion, volume 95 of Probability theory and stochastic modelling

    S. Peng.Nonlinear expectations and stochastic calculus under uncertainty: with robust CLT andG–Brownian motion, volume 95 of Probability theory and stochastic modelling. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2019

    2019

  125. [132]

    Peng and Y

    S. Peng and Y. Song.G-expectation weighted Sobolev spaces, backward SDE and path dependent PDE.Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 67(4):1725–1757, 2015

    2015

  126. [133]

    Peng and M

    S. Peng and M. Xu.GΓ-expectations and the related nonlinear Doob–Meyer decomposition theorem. In S. Tang and J. Yong, editors, Control theory and related topics—in memory of Professor Xunjing Li, Fudan University, China, 3–5 June 2005, pages 122–140, 2007

    2005

  127. [134]

    S. Peng, Y. Song, and J. Zhang. A complete representation theorem forG-martingales.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 86(4):609–631, 2014

    2014

  128. [135]

    Popier and C

    A. Popier and C. Zhou. Second order BSDE under monotonicity condition and liquidation problem under uncertainty.The Annals of Applied Probability, 29(3):1685–1739, 2019

    2019

  129. [136]

    Possamaï

    D. Possamaï. Second order backward stochastic differential equations under a monotonicity condition.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 123(5):1521–1545, 2013

    2013

  130. [137]

    Possamaï and M

    D. Possamaï and M. Rodrigues. Reflections on BSDEs.Electronic Journal of Probability, 29(66):1–82, 2024

    2024

  131. [138]

    Possamaï and X

    D. Possamaï and X. Tan. Weak approximation of second-order BSDEs.The Annals of Applied Probability, 25(5):2535–2562, 2015

    2015

  132. [139]

    Possamaï and C

    D. Possamaï and C. Zhou. Second order backward stochastic differential equations with quadratic growth.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 123(10):3770–3799, 2013

    2013

  133. [140]

    Possamaï, G

    D. Possamaï, G. Royer, and N. Touzi. On the robust superhedging of measurable claims.Electronic Communications in Probability, 18(95):1–13, 2013

    2013

  134. [142]

    Possamaï, N

    D. Possamaï, N. Touzi, and J. Zhang. Zero-sum path-dependent stochastic differential games in weak formulation.The Annals of Applied Probability, 30(3):1415–1457, 2020

    2020

  135. [143]

    Ren and X

    Z. Ren and X. Tan. On the convergence of monotone schemes for path-dependent PDE.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 127(6):1738–1762, 2017

    2017

  136. [144]

    Z. Ren, N. Touzi, and J. Yang. Nonlinear predictable representation andL1-solutions of backward SDEs and second-order backward SDEs.Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques(B), 58(2):639–666, 2022

    2022

  137. [145]

    Z. Ren, X. Tan, N. Touzi, and J. Yang. Entropic optimal planning for path-dependent mean field games.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 61(3):1415–1437, 2023

    2023

  138. [146]

    M. Royer. Backward stochastic differential equations with jumps and related non-linear expectations.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 116(10):1358–1376, 2006

    2006

  139. [147]

    Sheng.Quadratic second-order backward stochastic differential equation and numeric analysis for Sannikov’s optimal contracting problem

    B. Sheng.Quadratic second-order backward stochastic differential equation and numeric analysis for Sannikov’s optimal contracting problem. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique, 2022

    2022

  140. [148]

    NonlineardecompositionofDoob–Meyer’stypeforcontinuousg-supermartingalewithuniformlycontinuous coefficient.Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014(743508):1–9, 2014

    X.Shi, L.Jiang, andR.Ji. NonlineardecompositionofDoob–Meyer’stypeforcontinuousg-supermartingalewithuniformlycontinuous coefficient.Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014(743508):1–9, 2014

    2014

  141. [149]

    Shiryaev.Probability–1, volume 95 ofGraduate texts in mathematics

    A.N. Shiryaev.Probability–1, volume 95 ofGraduate texts in mathematics. Springer New York, 3rd edition, 2016. 105

    2016

  142. [150]

    Shiryaev and A.S

    A.N. Shiryaev and A.S. Cherny. Vector stochastic integrals and the fundamental theorems of asset pricing.Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni VA Steklova, 237:12–56, 2002

    2002

  143. [151]

    Soner, N

    H.M. Soner, N. Touzi, and J. Zhang. Martingale representation theorem for theG-expectation.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 121(2):265–287, 2011

    2011

  144. [152]

    Soner, N

    H.M. Soner, N. Touzi, and J. Zhang. Quasi-sure stochastic analysis through aggregation.Electronic Journal of Probability, 16(2): 1844–1879, 2011

    2011

  145. [153]

    Soner, N

    H.M. Soner, N. Touzi, and J. Zhang. Wellposedness of second order backward SDEs.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 153(1–2): 149–190, 2012

    2012

  146. [154]

    Soner, N

    H.M. Soner, N. Touzi, and J. Zhang. Dual formulation of second order target problems.The Annals of Applied Probability, 23(1): 308–347, 2013

    2013

  147. [155]

    Y. Song. Some properties onG-evaluation and its applications toG-martingale decomposition.Science China Mathematics, 54(2): 287–300, 2011

    2011

  148. [156]

    Stroock and S.R.S

    D.W. Stroock and S.R.S. Varadhan.Multidimensional diffusion processes, volume 233 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1997

    1997

  149. [157]

    S. Sun. Mean-field backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion and related partial differential equations. Mathematical Methods in Applied Sciences, 43(12):7484–7505, 2020

    2020

  150. [158]

    S. Sun. Mean-field backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion with uniformly continuous coefficients. Applicable Analysis, 101(14):5053–5075, 2022

    2022

  151. [159]

    S. Sun. Mean-field forward–backward stochastic differential equations driven byG–Brownian motion.Statistics & Probability Letters, 223:110429, 2025

    2025

  152. [160]

    Sun and F

    Y. Sun and F. Wang.G–forward performance process and representation of homothetic case via ergodic quadraticG–BSDE.Proba- bility, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 9(1):85–106, 2024

    2024

  153. [161]

    J. Sung. Optimal contracting under mean–volatility joint ambiguity uncertainties.Economic Theory, 74:593–642, 2022

    2022

  154. [162]

    von Weizsäcker and G

    H. von Weizsäcker and G. Winkler.Stochastic integrals. Advanced lectures in mathematics. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden, 1990

    1990

  155. [163]

    BackwardstochasticdifferentialequationsdrivenbyG–Brownianmotionwithuniformlycontinuousgenerators

    F.WangandG.Zheng. BackwardstochasticdifferentialequationsdrivenbyG–Brownianmotionwithuniformlycontinuousgenerators. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 34:660–681, 2021

    2021

  156. [164]

    X. Xiao, W. Qiu, and O. Nikan. Numerical approximation based on deep convolutional neural network for high-dimensional fully nonlinear merged PDEs and 2BSDEs.Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 47(7):6184–6204, 2024

    2024

  157. [165]

    Xu and B

    J. Xu and B. Zhang. Martingale characterization ofG–Brownian motion.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 119(1):232–248, 2009

    2009

  158. [166]

    Multi-valuedbackwardstochasticdifferentialequationsdrivenbyG–Brownianmotionanditsapplications

    F.Yang, Y.Ren, andL.Hu. Multi-valuedbackwardstochasticdifferentialequationsdrivenbyG–Brownianmotionanditsapplications. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 2017

    2017

  159. [167]

    Zhang.Backward stochastic differential equations—from linear to fully nonlinear theory, volume 86 ofProbability theory and stochastic modelling

    J. Zhang.Backward stochastic differential equations—from linear to fully nonlinear theory, volume 86 ofProbability theory and stochastic modelling. Springer-Verlag New York, 2017

    2017

  160. [168]

    Zhang and L

    W. Zhang and L. Jiang. Solutions of BSDEs with a kind of non-Lipschitz coefficients driven byG–Brownian motion.Statistics & Probability Letters, 171:109024, 2021. 106

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.