Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Attosecond Control and Measurement of Chiral Photoionisation Dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper demonstrates the first attosecond chiroptical spectroscopy of chiral molecules, showing that circularly polarized attosecond pulses combined with an infrared field can control and measure chiral electron dynamics in time.

desk verdict First circularly polarized attosecond pulses on chiral molecules; the delay measurements are solid, but the PECD control numbers rest on an unquantified normalization choice. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01906 v1 pith:QCWSXYM6 submitted 2025-07-02 physics.chem-ph

Meng Han , Jia-Bao Ji , Alexander Blech , R. Esteban Goetz , Corbin Allison , Loren Greenman , Christiane P. Koch , Hans Jakob Wörner This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords attosecondchiropticalspectroscopyphotoelectroncirculardichroismRABBITphotoionizationdelayscircularlypolarizedpulseschiralmoleculesmethyloxiranecoherentcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to open chiral molecules to attosecond time-resolved spectroscopy. Using circularly polarized attosecond pulse trains combined with a co-rotating infrared field, the authors measure and coherently control photoelectron circular dichroism in methyloxirane, nearly doubling it and even reversing its sign at one sideband by tuning the XUV-infrared delay. They further report chiral asymmetries in photoionization delays: forward-backward delays up to 120 attoseconds and polar-angle-resolved variations up to 240 attoseconds, including an about 60 attosecond chiral contribution from continuum-continuum transitions. If correct, this establishes the first capability to measure and control chiral electron dynamics on their natural timescale, with implications for understanding chirality-induced spin selectivity and other chiral light-matter phenomena.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing technique is RABBIT (reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions), advanced to circularly polarized attosecond pulses. Interference between one-XUV-one-IR pathways produces sidebands whose yield oscillates with the XUV-IR delay; the oscillation phase carries the molecular photoionization delay, and the difference between enantiomers or between forward and backward emission isolates the chiral part. The paper also derives the two-color angle-resolved PECD form $(a_1 + a_2 \sin^2\theta + a_3 \cos^2\theta)\cos\theta$, and exploits the angular streaking principle whereby the azimuthal emission angle $\phi$ plays the role of the XUV-IR delay in circularly polarized dressing fields.

What would settle it

An experiment with absolute count calibration, or an independent normalization such as using total ion counts, that checks whether the PECD at sideband 14 actually reverses sign when the XUV-IR delay is scanned in co-rotating circular fields, and that reproduces the roughly 120 attosecond forward-backward delay and roughly 240 attosecond polar-angle variation with a different molecular target or detection geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that chiral photoionization dynamics can be resolved and steered at attosecond precision. The combination of characterized circularly polarized attosecond pulses with momentum-vector-resolved electron-ion coincidence detection and RABBIT-style two-photon interferometry yields three results: co-rotating XUV and IR fields approximately double the photoelectron circular dichroism compared to single-photon ionization and can flip its sign at sideband 14 as a function of XUV-IR delay; chiral photoionization delays depend on both polar and azimuthal emission angles, so three-dimensional momentum resolution is required; and measured chiral-sensitive delays reach about 120 attoseconds in the forward-backward direction and about 240 attoseconds in polar-angle-resolved maps, with roughly 60 attoseconds originating from chirality in the IR-driven continuum-continuum transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative PECD values rest on the assumption that normalizing each enantiomer's angular distribution by its own maximum does not bias the ratio, since absolute circular dichroism could not be resolved on the raw counts; the delay measurements, being phase-based, are less exposed to this assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Chiral electron dynamics in molecules can now be measured in time, not just inferred from intensities, opening the door to time-resolved studies of chiral recognition and enantioselective photochemistry.
  • The near-doubling of PECD in co-rotating fields and the ability to reverse its sign at a chosen sideband provide a direct coherent-control handle for enhancing chiral sensitivity in photoelectron spectroscopy.
  • Because chiral delays depend on both polar and azimuthal angles, any future chiral attosecond measurement without 3D momentum resolution will average away part of the chiral timing information.
  • The agreement between experiment and the perturbative two-photon model validates the calculation framework, so the same theory can be used to predict which molecular targets show still larger controllable chiral signatures.
  • Resolving the chiral contribution of continuum-continuum transitions opens a route to separate the chiral scattering dynamics of the outgoing electron from the initial bound-state chirality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The per-enantiomer normalization of each angular distribution to its own maximum means the absolute PECD magnitudes and the exact enhancement factor should be re-checked once absolute count calibration is available; the reported delay differences, being phase-based, are less exposed to this caveat.
  • The linear dependence of RABBIT phase on azimuthal angle in circularly polarized fields suggests a practical route to encoding sub-cycle timing into angular maps, potentially enabling single-shot chiral delay retrieval.
  • If the enhancement factor tracks molecular anisotropy, as the CHBrClF versus methyloxirane comparison suggests, testing molecules with stronger photoelectron anisotropy should yield even larger controlled PECD changes.
  • The measured chiral delay asymmetry in continuum-continuum transitions implies that even the dressing step in RABBIT is chirality-sensitive in a chiral molecule, which has to be accounted for in any future attosecond chiral chronoscopy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first application of circularly polarized attosecond pulses to chiral molecules, combining attosecond pulse trains with 3D-momentum electron-ion coincidence detection in COLTRIMS. Using RABBIT interferometry on methyloxirane, the authors claim coherent control of photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD), nearly doubling it and reversing its sign at sideband 14, and the measurement of chiral asymmetries in forward-backward photoionisation delays (up to 120 as) and polar-angle-resolved delays (up to 240 as), including a ~60 as contribution attributed to chirality in continuum-continuum transitions. A frozen-core Hartree-Fock simulation is used to support the interpretation.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this work introduces a new capability: resolving and controlling chiral electron dynamics on the attosecond timescale. The experimental design is careful in several respects: enantiomer switching is performed under locked XUV-IR phase, coincidence detection selects the parent-ion channel, Fourier filtering isolates the 2-omega component, and delay measurements use the background-over-signal uncertainty method. The data availability statement and the use of enantiomer-switching controls are strengths. However, the headline PECD-control claims rest on a normalization assumption that can bias the reported enhancement and sign reversal, and the PECD results are presented without error bars; these issues are load-bearing for the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Data Analysis] The PECD definition in the main text is 2[IS - IR]/[IS + IR], but the Methods state that 'we normalized each PAD by its own maximum, because our laser and beamline stabilization might be not enough to resolve the absolute CD on the counts.' If the S and R photoelectron angular distributions are divided by different maxima, and if those maxima are themselves chiral (nonzero PECD at forward/backward angles), the normalization factors differ. For a measured PECD of ~12%, the maxima of the two enantiomer distributions can differ by tens of percent, so the reported enhancement, suppression, or sign reversal in Fig. 2c,d can be biased or even inverted. No alternative normalization (integrated counts, theta=90 degree reference, or common scaling from XUV-only runs) is reported. This is directly load-bearing for the abstract and main-text claim of controlling and nearly doubling PECD.
  2. [Fig. 2c,d and Extended Data Fig. 2] The delay-resolved PECD values in Fig. 2d and Extended Data Fig. 2, and the comparisons in Fig. 2c, are shown without any error bars or other uncertainty estimates. The paper applies the background-over-signal method of Ref. 28 to the RABBIT delay data, but no analogous uncertainty is given for the PECD values. Without such estimates, the claims that the PECD is 'nearly double' and that it 'changes sign' at SB14 are not quantitatively supported. The authors should report statistical uncertainties for the PECD values and state the significance of the sign reversal.
  3. [Theoretical Methods, Computational model; main text around Extended Data Fig. 5] The theory-experiment comparison relies on an explicitly tuned parameter: 'By choosing the slope of the fitted virtual energies such as to avoid resonance-like enhancements of individual SBs, we achieve good agreement with the experimentally found forward-backward delays.' This means the theory curves in Figs. 3f and 4f are not parameter-free predictions, and the simulated agreement does not independently validate the measurement. Relatedly, the claim of a ~60 as chiral continuum-continuum contribution is based on a difference whose own error bars 'overlap with zero' according to the authors, yet this contribution is stated as a measured result in the abstract. Please soften this claim or provide a test that does not depend on the tuned slope.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] There are typographical errors throughout: 'asymmmetry' in the abstract, 'trasient-grating FROG' and 'preform the inverse Fourier transformation' in the Methods section should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 2c and main text around it] The text says the two-color PECDs are 'enhanced by up to three percent' and later that the PECD values are 'typically doubled'; please clarify whether the first number is an absolute percentage-point change and the second a relative factor, because the current wording is ambiguous.
  3. [Methods, Data Analysis] The sentence 'which is a non-dipole effect and beyond our manuscript' is unclear: the maximum-normalization assumption is a data-analysis choice, and its justification should be separated from the statement about non-dipole effects.
  4. [Theoretical Methods, Computational model] The simulation pulse parameters (Gaussian FWHM of 5 fs, IR intensity twice the XUV pulse intensity) are chosen to reproduce the measured photoelectron spectrum; please state explicitly which simulated quantities are predictions rather than fitted to experiment.
  5. [Extended Data Fig. 5] The panel labels are inconsistent: panel e is labeled 'd' and panel f is labeled 'd' as well; please correct the labeling so each panel has a unique identifier.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The experimental measurements are independent, but the theory-experiment agreement is partially circular because a fitted slope of virtual Hartree-Fock energies was tuned to match the measured delays.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, Theoretical methods, Computational model, paragraph on artificial resonances and slope optimization]
    "By choosing the slope of the fitted virtual energies such as to avoid resonance-like enhancements of individual SBs, we achieve good agreement with the experimentally found forward-backward delays shown in Fig. 3."

    The theoretical forward-backward delays presented in Fig. 3f are used as confirmation of the measured chiral delays, but the slope of the fitted virtual Hartree-Fock energies was explicitly chosen to achieve good agreement with these same measured delays. The subsequent agreement is therefore not a parameter-free prediction: a free parameter was tuned with the target measurement in view. This does not make the experimental data circular, but it makes the claimed theory-experiment validation partially fitted. The paper itself states that a more detailed understanding of the artificial resonances is ongoing research, which further underscores that the tuning is not an independent first-principles constraint.

full rationale

The central experimental results — the PECD enhancement and sign reversal, the forward-backward chiral delays of up to 120 as, and the angle-resolved delays of up to 240 as — are direct measurements from COLTRIMS and are not derived from the theory, so they are not circular. The theoretical framework is adapted from the authors' own prior work (Refs. 3, 4, 27), but this is a methodological continuation rather than a load-bearing self-citation; the measured datasets stand independently. The substantive circular element is in the theory-experiment comparison: the slope of the fitted virtual Hartree-Fock energies is optimized to avoid resonances and explicitly to achieve agreement with the measured forward-backward delays, so the theoretical agreement is partly fitted rather than predicted. The per-enantiomer maximum normalization described in Methods, Data Analysis is a genuine measurement-bias risk for absolute PECD values, but it is a calibration limitation, not a circular derivation. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no known result is merely renamed. Overall, the experimental claims are self-contained, but the supporting theory agreement is not a fully independent prediction, giving a score of 5.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum chemistry and attosecond metrology assumptions, plus one ad hoc theory parameter (the slope of fitted virtual Hartree-Fock energies) that is explicitly tuned to improve agreement with the measured delays. Simulation pulse parameters are also chosen to match the measured spectrum. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Slope of fitted virtual Hartree-Fock energies (artificial resonance mitigation) = not quantified in paper
    The theoretical method fits virtual orbital energies and optimizes the slope of the fitted energies to minimize artificial resonances from continuum discretization; the choice is explicitly made to achieve good agreement with the measured forward-backward delays (Methods, Theoretical methods, Computational model).
  • Simulation pulse parameters (XUV/IR FWHM, relative IR intensity, pulse shape) = XUV/IR FWHM 5 fs, IR intensity twice XUV intensity
    The pulse parameters are chosen to best reproduce the widths and relative intensities of the experimentally measured photoelectron spectrum (Methods, Theoretical methods, Computational model). These affect the computed RABBIT traces and PECD values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Frozen-core static-exchange approximation and electric-dipole approximation for photoionization.
    Theoretical simulations assume these approximations (Methods, Theoretical methods, Computational model).
  • domain assumption Second-order time-dependent perturbation theory is sufficient for the XUV+IR two-photon ionization.
    Stated as sufficient for the field intensities used (Methods, Theoretical methods, Computational model).
  • domain assumption Randomly oriented molecular ensemble and orientation averaging underpin the PECD angular formulas.
    The PECD and PAD expressions assume randomly oriented molecules (Theoretical methods, Angle- and delay-dependence of PECD).
  • ad hoc to paper The photoelectron continuum can be discretized and artificial resonances removed by choosing the slope of fitted virtual energies.
    This is an ad hoc correction particular to this work; the paper states that a more detailed understanding of the artificial resonance effects is the subject of ongoing research (Methods, Theoretical methods, Computational model).
  • domain assumption Azimuthal angle integration over ±15 degrees is sufficient to avoid smearing of the RABBIT phase for circular IR fields.
    The Data Analysis section states that the azimuthal angle should be fixed within a small range; reported results use a ±15 degree integration window.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Attosecond Control and Measurement of Chiral Photoionisation Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QCWSXYM6

@misc{pith2026250701906,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Attosecond Control and Measurement of Chiral Photoionisation Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QCWSXYM6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01906}
}
abstract

Many chirality-sensitive light-matter interactions are governed by chiral electron dynamics. Therefore, the development of advanced technologies harnessing chiral phenomena would critically benefit from measuring and controlling chiral electron dynamics on their natural attosecond time scales. Such endeavors have so far been hampered by the lack of characterized circularly polarized attosecond pulses, an obstacle that has recently been overcome (Han et al. Optica 10 (2023) 1044-1052, Han et al. Nature Physics 19 (2023) 230-236). In this article, we introduce chiroptical spectroscopy with attosecond pulses and demonstrate attosecond coherent control over photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD) (Goetz et al. Physical Review Letters 122 (2019) 013204, Goetz et al. arXiv:2104.07522), as well as the measurement of chiral asymmetries in the forward-backward and angle-resolved photoionisation delays of chiral molecules. We show that co-rotating attosecond and near-infrared pulses can nearly double the PECD and even change its sign compared to single-photon ionisation. We demonstrate that chiral photoionisation delays depend on both polar and azimuthal angles of photoemission in the light-propagation frame, requiring three-dimensional momentum resolution. We measure forward-backward chiral-sensitive delays of up to 120 as and polar-angle-resolved photoionisation delays up to 240 as, which include an asymmmetry of $\sim$60 as originating from chirality in the continuum-continuum transitions. Attosecond chiroptical spectroscopy opens the door to quantitatively understanding and controlling the dynamics of chiral molecules on the electronic time scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01906 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 2c compares the extracted PECD values in the XUV-only and XUV+IR cases. In the XUV-only case the highest PECD amounts to ∼12%. In the presence of a linearly polarized IR field, the PECDs at the SB positions are enhanced by up to three percent compared to the average PECD of the neighboring main bands. In the presence of a circularly polarized IR field, the SB PECDs are increased much more, which is in line wi… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & W¨ orner, H

    Han, M., Ji, J.-B., Ueda, K. & W¨ orner, H. J. Attosecond metrology in circular polarization. Optica 10, 1044–1052 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    & W¨ orner, H

    Han, M., Ji, J.-B., Balˇ ci¯ unas, T., Ueda, K. & W¨ orner, H. J. Attosecond circular- dichroism chronoscopy of electron vortices. Nature Physics 19, 230–236 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    E., Koch, C

    Goetz, R. E., Koch, C. P. & Greenman, L. Quantum control of photoelectron circular dichroism. Physical Review Letters122, 013204 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Continuum-electron interferometry for enhancement of photoelectron circular dichroism and measurement of bound, free, and mixed contributions to chiral response

    Goetz, R. E., Blech, A., Allison, C., Koch, C. P. & Greenman, L. Continuum- electron interferometry for enhancement of photoelectroncircular dichroism and measurement of bound, free, and mixed contributions to chiral response. arXiv:2104.07522

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    P., Paltiel, Y., Naaman, R

    Bloom, B. P., Paltiel, Y., Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. Chiral induced spin selectivity. Chemical Reviews 124, 1950–1991 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Suda, M. et al. Light-driven molecular switch for reconfigurable spin filters. Nature communications10, 2455 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Zhu, Q. et al. Multistate switching of spin selectivity in electron transport through light-driven molecular motors. Advanced science8, 2101773 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Ziv, A. et al. Chirality nanosensor with direct electric readout by coupling of nanofloret localized plasmons with electronic transport. Nano Letters 21, 6496– 6503 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Rodgers, D. S. Circular Dichroism: Theory and Spectroscopy (Nova Science Publishers, 2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Theory of the angular distribution of photoelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions

    Ritchie, B. Theory of the angular distribution of photoelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions. Physical Review A13, 1411 (1976)

    1976

  3. [11]

    B¨ owering, N. et al. Asymmetry in photoelectron emission from chiral molecules induced by circularly polarized light. Physical Review Letters86, 1187 (2001). 10

    2001

  4. [12]

    Cireasa, R. et al. Probing molecular chirality on a sub-femtosecond timescale. Nature Physics 11, 654–658 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    & W¨ orner, H

    Baykusheva, D. & W¨ orner, H. J. Chiral Discrimination through Bielliptical High- Harmonic Spectroscopy. Physical Review X8, 031060 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Lux, C. et al. Circular dichroism in the photoelectron angular distributions of camphor and fenchone from multiphoton ionization with femtosecond laser pulses. Angewandte Chemie International Edition51, 5001–5005 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    S., Ram, N

    Lehmann, C. S., Ram, N. B., Powis, I. & Janssen, M. H. Imaging photoelectron circular dichroism of chiral molecules by femtosecond multiphoton coincidence detection. The Journal of Chemical Physics139 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    & Baumert, T

    Lux, C., Wollenhaupt, M., Sarpe, C. & Baumert, T. Photoelectron circular dichroism of bicyclic ketones from multiphoton ionization with femtosecond laser pulses. ChemPhysChem 16, 115–137 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Beaulieu, S. et al. Attosecond-resolved photoionization of chiral molecules. Science 358, 1288–1294 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    et al.Photoexcitation circular dichroism in chiral molecules

    Beaulieu, S. et al.Photoexcitation circular dichroism in chiral molecules. Nature Physics 14, 484–489 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Baykusheva, D. et al. Real-time probing of chirality during a chemical reaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, 23923–23929 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Rozen, S. et al. Controlling subcycle optical chirality in the photoionization of chiral molecules. Physical Review X9, 031004 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Svoboda, V. et al. Femtosecond photoelectron circular dichroism of chemical reactions. Science Advances8, eabq2811 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    V., Artemyev, A

    Demekhin, P. V., Artemyev, A. N., Kastner, A. & Baumert, T. Photoelectron circular dichroism with two overlapping laser pulses of carrier frequencies ω and 2 ω linearly polarized in two mutually orthogonal directions. Physical Review Letters 121, 253201 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    S., Ueda, K

    Han, M., Ji, J.-B., Leung, C. S., Ueda, K. & W¨ orner, H. J. Separation of pho- toionization and measurement-induced delays. Science Advances 10, eadj2629 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    et al.Cold Target Recoil Ion Momentum Spectroscopy: a ‘momentum microscope’ to view atomic collision dynamics

    D¨ orner, R. et al.Cold Target Recoil Ion Momentum Spectroscopy: a ‘momentum microscope’ to view atomic collision dynamics. Physics Reports 330, 95–192 (2000)

    2000

  17. [25]

    Ullrich, J. et al. Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction- microscopes. Reports on Progress in Physics 66, 1463–1545. issn: 0034-4885 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    A., Dossmann, H., Nahon, L., Daly, S

    Garcia, G. A., Dossmann, H., Nahon, L., Daly, S. & Powis, I. Photoelec- tron circular dichroism and spectroscopy of trifluoromethyl-and methyl-oxirane: a comparative study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 16, 16214–16224 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    E., Koch, C

    Goetz, R. E., Koch, C. P. & Greenman, L. Perfect control of photoelectron anisotropy for randomly oriented ensembles of molecules by XUV REMPI and polarization shaping. The Journal of Chemical Physics151 (2019). 11

    2019

  20. [28]

    & W¨ orner, H

    Ji, J.-B., Heck, S., Han, M. & W¨ orner, H. J. Quantitative uncertainty determi- nation of phase retrieval in RABBITT. Optics Express 29, 27732 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    J., Natan, A

    Zipp, L. J., Natan, A. & Bucksbaum, P. H. Probing electron delays in above- threshold ionization. Optica 1, 361–364 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    & Waldeck, D

    Naaman, R., Paltiel, Y. & Waldeck, D. H. Chiral molecules and the electron spin. Nature Reviews Chemistry3, 250–260 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Evers, F. et al. Theory of chirality induced spin selectivity: Progress and challenges. Advanced Materials34, 2106629 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    & Subotnik, J

    Wu, Y. & Subotnik, J. E. Electronic spin separation induced by nuclear motion near conical intersections. Nature Communications 12, 700 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    T., Despr´ e, V., Golubev, N

    Matselyukh, D. T., Despr´ e, V., Golubev, N. V., Kuleff, A. I. & W¨ orner, H. J. Decoherence and revival in attosecond charge migration driven by non-adiabatic dynamics. Nature Physics 18, 1206–1213 (2022). Acknowledgments We thank A. Schneider and M. Seiler for their technica...

    2022

  26. [34]

    The artificial resonances not only affect the intensity of the SB signals, but also strongly influence the PECD and the RABBITT traces

    To remove residual artificial resonances, we fit the virtual Hartree-Fock energies and optimize the slope of the fitted energies, to minimize resonance effects. The artificial resonances not only affect the intensity of the SB signals, but also strongly influence the PECD and ...

  27. [35]

    & Lin, C

    Zhao, Z., Chang, Z., Tong, X. & Lin, C. Circularly-polarized laser-assisted pho- toionization spectra of argon for attosecond pulse measurements. Optics Express 13, 1966–1977 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    R., Raseev, G

    Lucchese, R. R., Raseev, G. & McKoy, V. Studies of differential and total pho- toionization cross sections of molecular nitrogen. Physical Review A25, 2572– 2587 (1982)

    1982

  29. [37]

    A., Lucchese, R

    Gianturco, F. A., Lucchese, R. R. & Sanna, N. Calculation of low-energy elastic cross sections for electron-CF4 scattering. The Journal of Chemical Physics100, 6464–6471 (1994)

    1994

  30. [38]

    Natalense, A. P. P. & Lucchese, R. R. Cross section and asymmetry parameter calculation for sulfur 1s photoionization of SF6. The Journal of Chemical Physics 111, 5344–5348 (1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    Greenman, L., Lucchese, R. R. & McCurdy, C. W. Variational treatment of electron–polyatomic-molecule scattering calculations using adaptive overset grids. Physical Review A96, 052706 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Werner, H.-J. et al. MOLPRO, version 2012.1, a package of ab initio programs http://www.molpro.net

    2012

  33. [41]

    J., Knizia, G., Manby, F

    Werner, H.-J., Knowles, P. J., Knizia, G., Manby, F. R. & Sch¨ utz, M. Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chemistry program package. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science2, 242–253 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    A., Dunning Jr., T

    Kendall, R. A., Dunning Jr., T. H. & Harrison, R. J. Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics96, 6796–6806 (1992)

    1992

  35. [43]

    E., Isaev, T

    Goetz, R. E., Isaev, T. A., Nikoobakht, B., Berger, R. & Koch, C. P. Theoretical description of circular dichroism in photoelectron angular distributions of ran- domly oriented chiral molecules after multi-photon photoionization. The Journal of Chemical Physics146, 024306 (201...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.