Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Renormalization group flows in area-metric gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper presents the first renormalization-group flow analysis of area-metric gravity and claims that quantum fluctuations make its ten shape-mismatching degrees of freedom heavy enough to decouple in the infrared, while parity…

desk verdict First FRG analysis of area-metric gravity, but the central decoupling claim may be an artifact of the spectrally adjusted regulator. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02034 v1 pith:QAYYA5G5 submitted 2025-07-02 gr-qc

Johanna Borissova , Bianca Dittrich , Astrid Eichhorn , Marc Schiffer This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.60.-m04.60.Pp11.10.Hi
keywords area-metricgravityrenormalizationgroupflowshape-mismatchingdegreesoffreedomdecouplingnon-metricmodesparityviolationImmirziparameterfunctionalspin-foamquantum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Area-metric gravity is a rank-4 geometry that contains the usual metric plus ten extra shape-mismatching degrees of freedom, and a spin-foam origin suggests these extra fields appear at the Planck scale. This paper asks whether those extra fields can disappear again at low energies, and reports the first RG-flow analysis aimed at answering that question: quantum fluctuations make the mass-squared of the non-metric modes grow toward the infrared, so the modes decouple and ordinary gravity is recovered. Along the way it finds that parity is not emergent and that the Immirzi parameter has RG fixed points at both zero and infinite values. If correct, area-metric gravity can be phenomenologically viable without fine-tuning the masses, while leaving possibly detectable parity-violating imprints.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the algebraic decomposition of area-metric perturbations around flat space, $a_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} = \delta_{\mu[\rho}\delta_{\sigma]\nu}h + 2(\delta_{\mu[\rho}\hat{h}_{\sigma]\nu}-\delta_{\nu[\rho}\hat{h}_{\sigma]\mu})+\omega_+ + \omega_-$, which separates the ten length-metric components $h_{\mu\nu}$ from the ten shape-mismatching components, split into selfdual and anti-selfdual Weyl modes $\omega_\pm$. The calculation is carried by the functional renormalization group with a spectrally adjusted Litim regulator, applied to a cubic truncation of the effective average action (Eq. 12) whose free parameters are the masses $m^2_\pm$, the kinetic mixing $\rho_\pm$, and the two three-point couplings $\alpha_\pm$ and $\beta_\pm$. The mechanism that decides decoupling is the sign of the leading term in the small-mass expansion of $\beta_{m^2_\pm}$: because it is $-2\alpha_\pm^2/(3\pi^2)+7\beta_\pm^2/(192\pi^2)$, the mass-squared is regenerated and grows, and at large masses the negative anomalous dimension $-3\beta_\pm^2/(128\pi^2)$ makes the dimensionful mass increase toward the IR.

What would settle it

An extended functional-RG calculation that runs the Newton coupling and the wave-function renormalizations of $h$ and $\omega_\pm$, and imposes any diffeomorphism-induced relation between $\alpha_\pm$ and $\beta_\pm$, would settle the claim: if the leading coefficient of $\beta_{m^2_\pm}$ at small masses (Eq. 34) becomes positive, or the large-mass anomalous dimension $-3\beta_\pm^2/(128\pi^2)$ changes sign, the generic decoupling of shape-mismatching modes fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quantum fluctuations drive the shape-mismatching degrees of freedom of an area metric to large masses, generically ensuring their decoupling from the length-metric sector at low energies. Concretely, expanding the mass $\beta$ functions at small dimensionless masses gives $\beta_{m^2_\pm} = -2\alpha_\pm^2/(3\pi^2)+7\beta_\pm^2/(192\pi^2)$, whose leading term is negative for either sign of $\alpha_\pm$, so a mass is generated even from a vanishing initial condition; at large masses $\beta_{m^2_\pm} = (-2-3\beta_\pm^2/(128\pi^2))m^2_\pm$, so the dimensionful mass grows toward the IR because the anomalous scaling dimension is $-3\beta_\pm^2/(128\pi^2)$. The same flow shows that parity is not an emergent symmetry: $\beta_{\delta\beta}=(-1-9\sigma_\beta^2/(1024\pi^2))\delta\beta$ keeps parity-violating differences relevant, and only the kinetic mixing $\delta\rho$ is driven to zero. Extracting the Immirzi parameter from the $h\omega_\pm$ sector yields a $\beta$ function with fixed points at $\gamma=0$ (marginally irrelevant) and at $\gamma\to\infty$, with the character of the latter depending on the couplings $\beta_\pm$. The paper also notes that at least one of the interaction couplings $\alpha_\pm$, $\beta_\pm$ remains relevant, so the heavy modes may still imprint large higher-curvature operators on the effective length-metric theory.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the extra fields decouple depends on a truncated action in which the cubic couplings α± and β± are treated as independent and the Newton coupling and wave-function renormalizations are not run, together with the assumption that a continuum quantum field theory exists between the fundamental scale and the Planck scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Shape-mismatching degrees of freedom acquire large masses from quantum fluctuations even starting from zero mass at the UV scale, so they decouple and the low-energy theory reduces to the length-metric (Einstein) sector.
  • At least one of the cubic couplings α± or β± remains relevant toward the IR, so off-shell heavy modes can generate large higher-curvature terms in the effective action for the metric.
  • Parity is not emergent: if parity is violated at the UV scale, the violation persists and can be large at the Planck scale unless initial conditions are fine-tuned.
  • The Immirzi parameter has fixed points at γ=0 and at γ→∞; γ=0 is marginally irrelevant, and the flow of 1/γ vanishes when the shape-mismatching modes decouple, so purely length-metric fluctuations do not run the Immirzi parameter.
  • A Landau pole in the couplings β± exists, but initial conditions can be chosen so that the masses become large and the modes decouple before the pole is reached.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct check would be to compute the same beta functions in Lorentzian signature or with a different regulator family; if the sign of Eq. (34) survives, the decoupling mechanism is likely scheme-independent.
  • The result suggests that spin-foam models need not fine-tune the masses of shape-mismatching modes: an RG run between the fundamental scale and the Planck scale can generate Planck-size masses from zero initial conditions, which would strengthen the effective-spin-foam continuum construction.
  • If the predicted parity-violating Wilson coefficients are large, area-metric gravity may be testable with gravitational-wave polarization measurements, even though the heavy modes themselves cannot propagate at low energies.
  • The same truncation could be applied to acyclic area metrics or to modified Plebanski theories with different constraint splits to see whether decoupling and parity results generalize beyond the 20-component cyclic case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper performs a first functional renormalization group (FRG) analysis of area-metric gravity, motivated by spin-foam quantum gravity. Starting from a perturbative action around a flat Euclidean background, it decomposes area-metric fluctuations into length-metric degrees of freedom h and selfdual/anti-selfdual shape-mismatching modes ω±, and truncates the effective average action to quadratic kinetic and mass terms plus cubic hω² and h²ω vertices with independent couplings α± and β±. The main results are beta functions for the masses m²± and for the parity-violating couplings: at small masses, β_{m²±} = −2α²±/(3π²) + 7β²±/(192π²), generating masses even from zero initial mass; at large masses, β_{m²±} = (−2 − 3β²±/(128π²)) m²±, which is claimed to make dimensionful masses grow toward the IR and hence decouple the shape-mismatching sector. The paper also reports that parity is not emergent (β_{δβ} = (−1 − 9σ²β/(1024π²)) δβ) and that the Immirzi parameter beta function has zeros at γ = 0 and γ → ∞. The authors explicitly acknowledge several limitations, including the truncation and the independence of α± and β± from diffeomorphism symmetry.

Significance. If the main claims hold, this would be an important first step toward connecting spin-foam quantum gravity, which naturally contains area-metric and shape-mismatching degrees of freedom, to low-energy general relativity. The paper introduces a new theory space into the FRG literature, provides explicit analytic beta functions for the mass, cubic couplings, parity differences, and Immirzi parameter, and clearly states its assumptions and caveats. The computation is honest about truncation dependence, and the algebraic projector formalism is a useful technical contribution. However, the central phenomenological conclusion — that shape-mismatching modes generically become Planck-mass-like and decouple — rests heavily on a spectrally adjusted regulator choice and on unconstrained cubic vertices. Those load-bearing points need to be addressed before the results can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. The claimed large-mass behavior is very likely a regulator artifact. With the spectrally adjusted regulator R_k = (k²/p²) r_k(p²/k²) Γ_k^(2) and the Litim shape function (18), for p² < k² one has Γ_k^(2) + R_k = Γ_k^(2) k²/p² and k∂_k R_k = 2k²Γ_k^(2)/p² plus terms proportional to k∂_k Γ_k^(2); the leading contribution to (Γ_k^(2) + R_k)^{-1} k∂_k R_k equals 2 and is independent of p² and of all masses. Thus the beta functions in the large-m² expansion, in particular Eq. (35), contain no k²/\bar{m}² suppression, and heavy modes remain active at all scales. The dimensionful-mass growth found from Eq. (35) is therefore not evidence for physical decoupling. Please recompute the flow with a regulator that does not factor Γ_k^(2), or otherwise demonstrate scheme independence of the large-mass anomalous dimension.
  2. The sign of the leading small-mass beta function, which is responsible for the claim that masses are generated from m² = 0, is controlled by the independent and currently unconstrained cubic couplings α± and β±. As the authors note in Sec. VIII, diffeomorphism symmetry does not fix relations among these couplings, and such relations could appear at higher order. Therefore the statement that mass generation is "generic" is not established; it is conditional on the combination −2α²±/(3π²) + 7β²±/(192π²) being negative. The abstract and conclusions should carry this caveat more prominently.
  3. The flow of the Immirzi parameter is obtained by projecting the flows of ρ± onto the algebraic relations (53)-(54), but these relations are not invariant under the RG flow; the parametrization in terms of σρ² and γ defines a convenient slice rather than a closed subsector. The fixed-point statements at γ = 0 and γ → ∞, and especially the notion of a "fixed line" for γ = 0 when β+ = β−, require a precise definition of the projection and of the subspace in which the fixed point is computed. Given the regulator issue raised above, the robustness of these results should be re-examined.
minor comments (4)
  1. The section heading "PER TURBA TIVE AREA-METRIC GRA VITY" in the table of contents contains typographical spacing artifacts; please typeset it correctly.
  2. The notation m²(Λ_UV) in Eq. (33) is used for a dimensionless initial mass squared, while the dimensionful mass is denoted \bar{m}² elsewhere; please align the notation to avoid confusion between the two quantities.
  3. The statement that "γ = 0 is a fixed line" for β+ = β− is unclear; please specify which parameters vary along this line and how the critical exponent is defined there.
  4. The comment connecting the parity-symmetric subspace to the no-global-symmetries conjecture may be too strong for a Euclidean truncated FRG computation; consider softening it or adding a reference to a detailed discussion of the limitations.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Mass and parity results are genuine FRG outputs, but the Immirzi-parameter zeros are largely built into the variable reparametrization.

  1. self definitional [Sec. VII, Eqs. (53)-(60)]
    "From Eq. (54), we obtain βγ−1 = 1/4 (ρ+(γ−1) · βρ+ − ρ−(γ−1) · βρ−) ... βγ = −γ2βγ−1 = 3/(256π2)(β2+ + β2−) γ + O(γ^{3/2}). This beta function features a fixed point at γ = 0 with a critical exponent θγ = − 3/(256π2)(β2+ + β2−) which is always negative for non-zero β±."

    The Immirzi parameter is not an independent coupling in the truncation: γ^{-1} is defined by ρ+^2 − ρ−^2 = 8γ^{-1} (Eq. 54), and Eq. (56) defines β_{γ^{-1}} from β_{ρ±}. Eq. (60) then defines βγ = −γ²β_{γ^{-1}}. In this definition the zero at γ=0 is automatic: any β_{γ^{-1}} that grows no faster than linearly in γ^{-1} (Eq. 57 gives O(γ^{-1})) yields βγ(0)=0 after multiplication by γ². Thus the abstract's 'zero at vanishing Immirzi parameter' is a kinematic consequence of the variable change, not a dynamical fixed point discovered by the FRG computation. The genuinely computed content is the coefficient/critical exponent, not the existence of the zero.

  2. other [Sec. VII, after Eq. (58); see also Abstract]
    "From Eq. (57) we observe that the RG flow for γ−1 vanishes if we take β± → 0 and m2± → ∞, i.e., if we decouple the shape-mismatching degrees of freedom."

    The abstract presents 'zeros at ... infinite Immirzi parameter' as a result of the setup, but this zero is obtained only in the limit β±→0 and m²±→∞, i.e., precisely the decoupling of shape-mismatching degrees of freedom that the main analysis is supposed to establish. Using the target scenario as the input to produce the Immirzi fixed point makes this a conditional consistency check rather than an independent prediction; the Discussion's unqualified 'both fixed points of all settings' overstates this conditional result.

full rationale

The central RG results — the small-mass beta function β_{m²±} = −2α²±/(3π²) + 7β²±/(192π²) (Eq. 34), the large-mass beta function (Eq. 35), and the parity-violating difference beta functions (Eqs. 43-46) — are genuine outputs of the FRG trace evaluation with the stated truncation (Eq. 12). They are not fitted to data, and no parameter is tuned to reproduce them. The decoupling conclusion depends on the regulator choice (Eq. 17) and on the truncation; the paper itself flags the truncation and diffeomorphism-symmetry caveats in Sec. VIII. The regulator artifact concern raised by the skeptic (threshold cancellation in the spectrally adjusted regulator) is a correctness/robustness risk, not a circularity, so it does not raise the circularity score under the hard rules. The Immirzi section is where circularity enters: γ is an algebraic reparametrization of ρ± (Eqs. 53-55), and the zero of βγ at γ=0 follows from βγ = −γ²β_{γ^{-1}} (Eq. 60) rather than from the dynamics; the γ→∞ zero is obtained by assuming the decoupling the paper aims to prove. These are secondary results, so the overall circularity is partial, not total.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis uses a truncated effective average action, so the central input is the choice of interactions in Eq. (12) and the FRG scheme. No new entities are introduced; the ω± fields are inherited from prior area-metric actions. The free parameters are the initial couplings and masses, which are not fitted to data but whose assumed (near-)equal sizes drive the sign of the mass generation.

free parameters (6)
  • α± (cubic hω² vertex)
    Introduced in Eq. (12). Values not fixed by diffeomorphism symmetry at cubic order; sign of the mass beta function in Eq. (34) depends on the relative size of α± and β±.
  • β± (cubic h²ω vertex)
    Introduced in Eq. (12). Controls large-mass anomalous dimensions and the Landau pole in Eq. (62).
  • ρ± (h-ω kinetic mixing)
    Mixing couplings in Eq. (12); free initial conditions at ΛUV. Reparametrized into σρ² and γ in Sec. VII.
  • m²±(ΛUV) (initial mass squared)
    Initial conditions for the shape-mismatching masses. The paper argues the flow generates mass from zero, but the final value depends on the initial condition and RG time.
  • σρ² (sum of ρ²±)
    Free parameter introduced in Eq. (53) for the Immirzi flow analysis.
  • g = k²GN (dimensionless Newton coupling)
    Treated as a fixed input; its own beta function and anomalous dimensions of h and ω± are not computed.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Wetterich equation with spectrally adjusted Litim regulator and background-field approximation
    Invoked in Sec. III, Eqs. (16)-(18). Standard FRG framework.
  • domain assumption Euclidean signature and flat background δμν
    The flow is evaluated around flat Euclidean space; Lorentzian effects are acknowledged as a limitation in Sec. VIII.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncation of Γk to the action of Eq. (12) with independent α±, β± and no running of GN or wave functions
    Central model assumption. The paper notes diffeomorphism invariance does not fix cubic relations and higher-order vertices are neglected.
  • domain assumption Existence of a continuum effective QFT regime between ΛUV and the Planck scale
    Stated in Secs. I and VIII as a central premise for the analysis.
  • domain assumption Immirzi identification via γ± = (1/(8πGN))(1 ± 1/γ) and the projection ρ²+ ± ρ²− relations
    Connects the general quadratic action to the Holst subclass, following [25,26] and [26] (Eqs. 47-55).
  • domain assumption Ghost and gauge-fixing sector does not affect the flows
    Stated after Eq. (13); beta functions are computed without ghost contributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Renormalization group flows in area-metric gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QAYYA5G5

@misc{pith2026250702034,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Renormalization group flows in area-metric gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QAYYA5G5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02034}
}
read the original abstract

We put forward the first analysis of renormalization group flows in an area-metric theory, motivated by spin-foam quantum gravity. Area-metric gravity contains the well-known length-metric degrees of freedom of standard gravity as well as additional shape-mismatching degrees of freedom. To be phenomenologically viable, the shape-mismatching degrees of freedom have to decouple under the renormalization group flow towards lower scales. We test this scenario by calculating the renormalization group flow of the masses and find that these are in general even more relevant than dictated by their canonical scaling dimension. This generically results in masses which are large compared to the Planck mass and thereby ensure the decoupling of shape-mismatching degrees of freedom. In addition, the latter come in a left-handed and right-handed sector. We find that parity symmetry does not emerge under the renormalization group flow. Finally, we extract the renormalization group flow of the Immirzi parameter from this setup and find that its beta function features zeros at vanishing as well as at infinite Immirzi parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02034 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The basic building blocks in a four-dimensional triangulation are four-simplices. A four-simplex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spherically symmetric solutions in quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity, static spherically symmetric Frobenius solutions are classified: regular cores only, Schwarzschild-like horizons and wormhole throats, plus asymptotic 1/r^6 corrections to Schwarzschild.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    phenomenologically safe

    tensor which can be combined into the symmetric tensor hµν = ˆhµν + 1 4 δµνh . (7) The Weyl components of the area-metric perturbation ω±µνρσ are traceless ( ω±µνρσ δµρ = 0) and selfdual (anti-selfdual), i.e., 1 2 ϵ αβ µν ω±αβρσ = ± ω±µνρσ . (8) The most general local and diffeomorphism-invariant Lagrangian at second order in area metric fluctuations and ...

    1984

  2. [2]

    de Boer et al., Frontiers of Quantum Gravity: shared challenges, converging directions , arXiv:2207.10618

    J. de Boer et al., Frontiers of Quantum Gravity: shared challenges, converging directions , arXiv:2207.10618

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  4. [4]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  5. [5]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, Gauge/gravity duality, gr-qc/0602037

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    V. E. Hubeny, The AdS/CFT Correspondence, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 no. 12 [ arXiv:1501.00007]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, [ hep-th/0603001]

    arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety , vol

    R. Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety , vol. 3 of 100 Years of General Relativity. World Scientific, 2017

    2017

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety . Cambridge University Press, 1, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    J. E. Daum and M. Reuter, Renormalization Group Flow of the Holst Action , Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 215–218, [ arXiv:1012.4280]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Harst and M

    U. Harst and M. Reuter, The ’Tetrad only’ theory space: Nonperturbative renormalization flow and Asymptotic Safety , JHEP 05 (2012) 005, [ arXiv:1203.2158]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. E. Daum and M. Reuter, Einstein-Cartan gravity, Asymptotic Safety, and the running Immirzi parameter, Annals Phys. 334 (2013) 351–419, [ arXiv:1301.5135]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Eichhorn, On unimodular quantum gravity , Class

    A. Eichhorn, On unimodular quantum gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 115016, [arXiv:1301.0879]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Percacci, M

    R. Percacci, M. J. Perry, C. N. Pope, and E. Sezgin, Beta Functions of Topologically Massive Supergravity, JHEP 03 (2014) 083, [ arXiv:1302.0868]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Harst and M

    U. Harst and M. Reuter, On selfdual spin-connections and Asymptotic Safety , Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 395–400, [ arXiv:1509.09122]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Rovelli, Quantum gravity

    C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2004

    2004

  9. [17]

    Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity

    T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    Engle, E

    J. Engle, E. Livine, R. Pereira, and C. Rovelli, LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter , Nucl. Phys. B 799 (2008) 136–149, [ arXiv:0711.0146]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Freidel and K

    L. Freidel and K. Krasnov, A New Spin Foam Model for 4d Gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 125018, [arXiv:0708.1595]. 21

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Perez, The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity , Living Rev

    A. Perez, The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity , Living Rev. Rel. 16 (2013) 3, [arXiv:1205.2019]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Engle and S

    J. Engle and S. Speziale, Spin Foams: Foundations . 2023. arXiv:2310.20147

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    S. K. Asante, B. Dittrich, and H. M. Haggard, Effective Spin Foam Models for Four-Dimensional Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020), no. 23 231301, [ arXiv:2004.07013]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    S. K. Asante, B. Dittrich, and J. Padua-Arguelles, Effective spin foam models for Lorentzian quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021), no. 19 195002, [ arXiv:2104.00485]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dittrich, Modified Graviton Dynamics From Spin Foams: The Area Regge Action , arXiv:2105.10808

    B. Dittrich, Modified Graviton Dynamics From Spin Foams: The Area Regge Action , arXiv:2105.10808

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dittrich and A

    B. Dittrich and A. Kogios, From spin foams to area metric dynamics to gravitons , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 9 095011, [ arXiv:2203.02409]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. N. Borissova and B. Dittrich, Towards effective actions for the continuum limit of spin foams , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 10 105006, [ arXiv:2207.03307]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. N. Borissova, B. Dittrich, and K. Krasnov, Area-metric gravity revisited, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 12 124035, [ arXiv:2312.13935]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dittrich and J

    B. Dittrich and J. Padua-Arg¨ uelles,Twisted geometries are area-metric geometries , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 2 026002, [ arXiv:2302.11586]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    F. P. Schuller and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, Geometry of manifolds with area metric: multi-metric backgrounds, Nucl. Phys. B 747 (2006) 398–422, [ hep-th/0508170]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    F. P. Schuller and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, Canonical differential geometry of string backgrounds , JHEP 02 (2006) 059, [ hep-th/0511157]

    2006 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Punzi, F

    R. Punzi, F. P. Schuller, and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, Geometry for the accelerating universe , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 101501, [ hep-th/0612133]

    2007 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Punzi, F

    R. Punzi, F. P. Schuller, and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, Area metric gravity and accelerating cosmology, JHEP 02 (2007) 030, [ hep-th/0612141]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ho and T

    P.-M. Ho and T. Inami, Geometry of Area Without Length , PTEP 2016 [arXiv:1508.05569]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Borissova and P.-M

    J. Borissova and P.-M. Ho, From area metric backgrounds to the cosmological constant and corrections to the Polyakov action , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 4 046017, [ arXiv:2404.14478]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    F. P. Schuller, C. Witte, and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, Causal structure and algebraic classification of area metric spacetimes in four dimensions , Annals Phys. 325 (2010) 1853–1883, [ arXiv:0908.1016]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    E. R. Livine and S. Speziale, A New spinfoam vertex for quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 084028, [arXiv:0705.0674]

    2007 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Freidel and J

    L. Freidel and J. Hnybida, A Discrete and Coherent Basis of Intertwiners , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 015019, [ arXiv:1305.3326]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dittrich and S

    B. Dittrich and S. Speziale, Area-angle variables for general relativity , New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 083006, [arXiv:0802.0864]

    2008 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Dittrich and J

    B. Dittrich and J. P. Ryan, Phase space descriptions for simplicial 4d geometries , Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 065006, [ arXiv:0807.2806]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dittrich and J

    B. Dittrich and J. P. Ryan, Simplicity in simplicial phase space , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 064026, [arXiv:1006.4295]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. F. Plebanski, On the separation of Einsteinian substructures , J. Math. Phys. 18 (1977) 2511–2520

    1977

  34. [42]

    Capovilla, T

    R. Capovilla, T. Jacobson, J. Dell, and L. J. Mason, Selfdual two forms and gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991) 41–57

    1991

  35. [43]

    M. P. Reisenberger, New constraints for canonical general relativity , Nucl. Phys. B 457 (1995) 643–687, [gr-qc/9505044]

    1995 arXiv

  36. [44]

    De Pietri and L

    R. De Pietri and L. Freidel, so(4) Plebanski action and relativistic spin foam model , Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 2187–2196, [ gr-qc/9804071]

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Krasnov, Plebanski Formulation of General Relativity: A Practical Introduction , Gen

    K. Krasnov, Plebanski Formulation of General Relativity: A Practical Introduction , Gen. Rel. Grav. 43 (2011) 1–15, [ arXiv:0904.0423]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Krasnov, Renormalizable Non-Metric Quantum Gravity? , hep-th/0611182

    K. Krasnov, Renormalizable Non-Metric Quantum Gravity? , hep-th/0611182

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Krasnov, Plebanski gravity without the simplicity constraints , Class

    K. Krasnov, Plebanski gravity without the simplicity constraints , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 055002, [arXiv:0811.3147]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Freidel, Modified gravity without new degrees of freedom , arXiv:0812.3200

    L. Freidel, Modified gravity without new degrees of freedom , arXiv:0812.3200

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Krasnov, Gravity as BF theory plus potential , Int

    K. Krasnov, Gravity as BF theory plus potential , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24 (2009) 2776–2782, [arXiv:0907.4064]. 22

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Krasnov, Effective metric Lagrangians from an underlying theory with two propagating degrees of freedom, Phys

    K. Krasnov, Effective metric Lagrangians from an underlying theory with two propagating degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 084026, [ arXiv:0911.4903]

    2010 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Speziale, Bi-metric theory of gravity from the non-chiral Plebanski action , Phys

    S. Speziale, Bi-metric theory of gravity from the non-chiral Plebanski action , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 064003, [arXiv:1003.4701]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    D. Beke, G. Palmisano, and S. Speziale, Pauli-Fierz Mass Term in Modified Plebanski Gravity , JHEP 03 (2012) 069, [ arXiv:1112.4051]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Alexandrov and K

    S. Alexandrov and K. Krasnov, Hamiltonian Analysis of non-chiral Plebanski Theory and its Generalizations, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 055005, [ arXiv:0809.4763]

    2009 arXiv

  46. [54]

    K. S. Stelle, Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives , Gen. Rel. Grav. 9 (1978) 353–371

    1978

  47. [55]

    Krasnov, On deformations of Ashtekar’s constraint algebra , Phys

    K. Krasnov, On deformations of Ashtekar’s constraint algebra , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 081102, [arXiv:0711.0090]

    2008 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Alex and T

    N. Alex and T. Reinhart, Covariant constructive gravity: A step-by-step guide towards alternative theories of gravity , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 8 084025, [ arXiv:1909.03842]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    de Alwis, A

    S. de Alwis, A. Eichhorn, A. Held, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Schiffer, and F. Versteegen, Asymptotic safety, string theory and the weak gravity conjecture , Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134991, [arXiv:1907.07894]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Held, Effective asymptotic safety and its predictive power: Gauge-Yukawa theories , Front

    A. Held, Effective asymptotic safety and its predictive power: Gauge-Yukawa theories , Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 341, [ arXiv:2003.13642]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential , Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential , Phys. Lett. B 301 (1993) 90–94, [arXiv:1710.05815]

    1993 arXiv

  52. [60]

    T. R. Morris, The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9 (1994) 2411–2450, [ hep-ph/9308265]

    1994 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ellwanger, FLow equations for N point functions and bound states , Z

    U. Ellwanger, FLow equations for N point functions and bound states , Z. Phys. C 62 (1994) 503–510, [hep-ph/9308260]

    1994 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity , Phys

    M. Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 971–985, [hep-th/9605030]

    1998 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Berges, N

    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics , Phys. Rept. 363 (2002) 223–386, [ hep-ph/0005122]

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisation group , Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 2831–2915, [hep-th/0512261]

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge theories , Lect

    H. Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge theories , Lect. Notes Phys. 852 (2012) 287–348, [ hep-ph/0611146]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Delamotte, An Introduction to the nonperturbative renormalization group , Lect

    B. Delamotte, An Introduction to the nonperturbative renormalization group , Lect. Notes Phys. 852 (2012) 49–132, [ cond-mat/0702365]

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    O. J. Rosten, Fundamentals of the Exact Renormalization Group , Phys. Rept. 511 (2012) 177–272, [arXiv:1003.1366]

    2012 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories , J

    J. Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories , J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 033001, [ arXiv:1108.4449]

    2012 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Einstein Gravity , New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 055022, [arXiv:1202.2274]

    2012 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications , Phys. Rept. 910 (2021) 1–114, [arXiv:2006.04853]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Reichert, Lecture notes: Functional Renormalisation Group and Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, PoS 384 (2020) 005

    M. Reichert, Lecture notes: Functional Renormalisation Group and Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, PoS 384 (2020) 005

    2020

  64. [72]

    D. F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105007, [hep-th/0103195]

    2001 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Eichhorn and S

    A. Eichhorn and S. Lippoldt, Quantum gravity and Standard-Model-like fermions , Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 142–146, [ arXiv:1611.05878]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Narain and R

    G. Narain and R. Percacci, Renormalization Group Flow in Scalar-Tensor Theories. I , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 075001, [ arXiv:0911.0386]

    2010 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Wetterich and M

    C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Gauge hierarchy problem in asymptotically safe gravity–the resurgence mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 770 (2017) 268–271, [ arXiv:1612.03069]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Eichhorn, Y

    A. Eichhorn, Y. Hamada, J. Lumma, and M. Yamada, Quantum gravity fluctuations flatten the Planck-scale Higgs potential , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 8 086004, [ arXiv:1712.00319]. 23

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    T. Zhu, W. Zhao, J.-M. Yan, Y.-Z. Wang, C. Gong, and A. Wang, Constraints on parity and Lorentz violations in gravity from GWTC-3 through a parametrization of modified gravitational wave propagations, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 6 064044, [ arXiv:2304.09025]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Yunes, X

    N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays , Living Rev. Rel. 28 (2025), no. 1 3

    2025

  71. [79]

    Banks and L

    T. Banks and L. J. Dixon, Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry , Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 93–108

    1988

  72. [80]

    Banks and N

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019, [ arXiv:1011.5120]

    2011 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 383 (2021), no. 3 1669–1804, [ arXiv:1810.05338]

    2021 arXiv

  74. [82]

    T. Daus, A. Hebecker, S. Leonhardt, and J. March-Russell, Towards a Swampland Global Symmetry Conjecture using weak gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 960 (2020) 115167, [ arXiv:2002.02456]

    2020 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Borissova, A

    J. Borissova, A. Eichhorn, and S. Ray, A non-local way around the no-global-symmetries conjecture in quantum gravity? , Class. Quant. Grav. 42 (2025), no. 3 037001, [ arXiv:2407.09595]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Hebecker, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Walcher, The absolute swampland , EPL 149 (2025), no. 3 39001, [ arXiv:2405.20386]

    2025 arXiv

  77. [85]

    J. F. Barbero G., Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5507–5510, [ gr-qc/9410014]

    1995 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Immirzi, Real and complex connections for canonical gravity , Class

    G. Immirzi, Real and complex connections for canonical gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) L177–L181, [gr-qc/9612030]

    1997 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Ashtekar, New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity , Phys

    A. Ashtekar, New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2244–2247

    1986

  80. [88]

    D. J. Rezende and A. Perez, 4d Lorentzian Holst action with topological terms , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064026, [ arXiv:0902.3416]

    2009 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Holst, Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action , Phys

    S. Holst, Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action , Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 5966–5969, [ gr-qc/9511026]

    1996 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Rovelli and L

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 442 (1995) 593–622, [ gr-qc/9411005]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 456, 753–754 (1995)]

    1995 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ashtekar and J

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Quantum theory of geometry. 1: Area operators , Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) A55–A82, [ gr-qc/9602046]

    1997 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Benedetti and S

    D. Benedetti and S. Speziale, Perturbative quantum gravity with the Immirzi parameter , JHEP 06 (2011) 107, [ arXiv:1104.4028]

    2011 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Dittrich and J

    B. Dittrich and J. P. Ryan, On the role of the Barbero-Immirzi parameter in discrete quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 095015, [ arXiv:1209.4892]

    2013 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Manrique, S

    E. Manrique, S. Rechenberger, and F. Saueressig, Asymptotically Safe Lorentzian Gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 251302, [ arXiv:1102.5012]

    2011 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Fehre, D

    J. Fehre, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Lorentzian Quantum Gravity and the Graviton Spectral Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 8 081501, [ arXiv:2111.13232]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    D’Angelo and K

    E. D’Angelo and K. Rejzner, A Lorentzian renormalisation group equation for gauge theories , arXiv:2303.01479

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    D’Angelo, Asymptotic safety in Lorentzian quantum gravity , Phys

    E. D’Angelo, Asymptotic safety in Lorentzian quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 6 066012, [arXiv:2310.20603]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang, Foliated asymptotically safe gravity in the fluctuation approach , JHEP 09 (2023) 064, [ arXiv:2306.10408]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Korver, F

    G. Korver, F. Saueressig, and J. Wang, Global flows of foliated gravity-matter systems , Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138789, [ arXiv:2402.01260]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang, Foliated asymptotically safe gravity: Lorentzian signature fluctuations from the Wick rotation , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 10 106007, [ arXiv:2501.03752]

    2025 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Percacci and G

    R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Asymptotic Safety, Emergence and Minimal Length , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 245026, [ arXiv:1008.3621]

    2010 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Basile and A

    I. Basile and A. Platania, Asymptotic Safety: Swampland or Wonderland? , Universe 7 (2021), no. 10 389, [arXiv:2107.06897]

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn, and R. Percacci,Matter matters in asymptotically safe quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 8 084035, [ arXiv:1311.2898]. 24

    2014 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn, and R. Percacci,Consistency of matter models with asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Can. J. Phys. 93 (2015), no. 9 988–994, [ arXiv:1410.4411]

    2015 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Meibohm, J

    J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Asymptotic safety of gravity-matter systems , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 8 084035, [ arXiv:1510.07018]

    2016 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Biemans, A

    J. Biemans, A. Platania, and F. Saueressig, Renormalization group fixed points of foliated gravity-matter systems, JHEP 05 (2017) 093, [ arXiv:1702.06539]

    2017 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Wetterich and M

    C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Variable Planck mass from the gauge invariant flow equation , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 6 066017, [ arXiv:1906.01721]

    2019 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Eichhorn and M

    A. Eichhorn and M. Schiffer, Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter , arXiv:2212.07456

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    Dittrich, The continuum limit of loop quantum gravity - a framework for solving the theory , pp

    B. Dittrich, The continuum limit of loop quantum gravity - a framework for solving the theory , pp. 153–179. 2017. arXiv:1409.1450

    2017 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Dittrich, S

    B. Dittrich, S. Mizera, and S. Steinhaus, Decorated tensor network renormalization for lattice gauge theories and spin foam models , New J. Phys. 18 (2016), no. 5 053009, [ arXiv:1409.2407]

    2016 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Delcamp and B

    C. Delcamp and B. Dittrich, Towards a phase diagram for spin foams , Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017), no. 22 225006, [ arXiv:1612.04506]

    2017 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Bahr and S

    B. Bahr and S. Steinhaus, Numerical evidence for a phase transition in 4d spin foam quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 14 141302, [ arXiv:1605.07649]

    2016 arXiv

  105. [113]

    S. K. Asante, B. Dittrich, and S. Steinhaus, Spin Foams, Refinement Limit, and Renormalization

  106. [114]

    Ferrero and T

    R. Ferrero and T. Thiemann, Relational Lorentzian Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity: Showcase Model, Universe 10 (2024), no. 11 410, [ arXiv:2404.18224]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Ferrero, M

    R. Ferrero, M. Han, and H. Liu, The one-loop effective action from the coherent state path integral of loop quantum gravity , arXiv:2502.07696

    arXiv

  108. [116]

    Knorr, The derivative expansion in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: general setup and quartic order, SciPost Phys

    B. Knorr, The derivative expansion in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: general setup and quartic order, SciPost Phys. Core 4 (2021) 020, [ arXiv:2104.11336]

    2021 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Knorr and M

    B. Knorr and M. Schiffer, Non-Perturbative Propagators in Quantum Gravity , Universe 7 (2021), no. 7 216, [ arXiv:2105.04566]

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.