pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.02304 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-03 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality: Structural Connectivity Reconstruction via Pairwise Information Flow in Nonlinear Networks

Kai Chen , Zhong-qi K. Tian , Yifei Chen , Shouwei Luo , Songting Li , Douglas Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 07:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords structural connectivitypairwise information flownonlinear networkscurse of dimensionalitynetwork reconstructioninformation theoryneuronal dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pairwise time-delayed information flow recovers structural connectivity in nonlinear networks without high-dimensional conditioning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that pairwise measurements of time-delayed information flow between nodes suffice to reconstruct the underlying structural connections in networks governed by general nonlinear dynamics. This addresses a core difficulty in complex systems research: inferring hidden architecture from observed behavior when direct measurements are impossible and systems grow large. Traditional model-based techniques demand prior knowledge of the exact equations, while model-free alternatives often lose quantitative accuracy or collapse under the computational cost of conditioning on many variables simultaneously. By deriving a quadratic link between the pairwise flow measure and actual coupling strength, and showing that indirect paths contribute only at higher orders, the work makes reconstruction feasible from local statistics alone. The approach remains agnostic to the specific form of the dynamics and scales to large systems, as demonstrated on simulated nonlinear oscillators, neuronal models, and real electrophysiological recordings.

Core claim

Pairwise delayed information flow (PDIF) is sufficient to recover structural connectivity in general nonlinear networks. The framework derives a quadratic relationship between PDIF and coupling strength, while demonstrating that contributions from indirect interactions are suppressed at leading order. This enables accurate reconstruction using only pairwise measurements, binary state representations, and time-delayed statistics, without requiring high-dimensional conditioning or knowledge of the underlying dynamical equations.

What carries the argument

Pairwise delayed information flow (PDIF), an information-theoretic quantity computed between node pairs at chosen time lags that exhibits a direct quadratic mapping to coupling strength while suppressing indirect paths at leading order.

If this is right

  • Reconstruction accuracy remains high even as network size increases, removing the exponential growth in data or computation required by full conditioning.
  • The same pairwise procedure works across different nonlinear dynamical regimes, including oscillator networks and spiking neuron models.
  • Robustness to additive noise allows practical use on experimental recordings without extensive preprocessing.
  • Because the method is model-agnostic, it can be applied to systems where the governing equations are unknown or only partially specified.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quadratic dependence suggests that connectivity changes could be tracked dynamically by monitoring shifts in pairwise flow over time in ongoing experiments.
  • Similar pairwise suppression arguments might be tested in non-neural domains such as gene regulatory networks or power-grid synchronization where indirect effects are also common.
  • Combining PDIF with targeted perturbations could provide a way to distinguish direct from indirect edges more cleanly than observational data alone allows.

Load-bearing premise

Indirect interactions between nodes contribute only at higher orders and can therefore be neglected when reconstructing connectivity from pairwise measurements alone.

What would settle it

Apply the method to a known large nonlinear network with documented structure and low noise; if the recovered edges deviate substantially from the true adjacency matrix in a way not explained by finite sampling, the central claim would be falsified.

read the original abstract

Inferring structural connectivity from observed dynamics remains a fundamental open problem in complex systems, particularly for nonlinear networks where direct measurements are unavailable, and existing methodological approaches each incur characteristic limitations. Model-based methods require prior knowledge of the mechanistic form of the underlying dynamics, while model-free approaches often lack quantitative correspondence to network structural connectivity, and suffer from the curse of dimensionality as the size and complexity of the system increases. Here we show that pairwise time-delayed information flow is sufficient to recover, without high-dimensional conditioning, structural connectivity in general nonlinear networks. We introduce a pairwise delayed information flow (PDIF) as an information-theoretic framework and derive a theoretical quadratic relationship between PDIF and coupling strength, establishing a direct correspondence between information flow and network architecture. We further show that indirect interaction contributions are suppressed at leading order, enabling accurate reconstruction solely from pairwise measurements. Combining binary state representations, pairwise inference, and time-delayed statistics, PDIF overcomes the dimensionality barrier while remaining model-agnostic and scalable. Validated across nonlinear dynamical systems, neuronal network models, and large-scale electrophysiological recordings, PDIF achieves high reconstruction accuracy and robustness to noise, outperforming existing methods. These results establish a principled, efficient and model-agnostic framework for connectivity reconstruction, and reveal a general mechanism by which pairwise observable statistics encode network structure in nonlinear systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces pairwise delayed information flow (PDIF) as an information-theoretic measure and derives a quadratic relationship between PDIF and direct coupling strength in nonlinear networks. It claims that indirect interaction contributions are suppressed at leading order, allowing accurate structural connectivity reconstruction from pairwise time-delayed statistics alone without high-dimensional conditioning. The approach combines binary state representations with time-delayed pairwise inference, is presented as model-agnostic and scalable, and is validated on nonlinear dynamical systems, neuronal network models, and large-scale electrophysiological recordings where it outperforms existing methods.

Significance. If the quadratic derivation and leading-order suppression hold without restrictive assumptions on coupling regime or nonlinearity class, the result would provide a principled, scalable route to connectivity inference that directly addresses the curse of dimensionality in high-dimensional nonlinear systems. The combination of an explicit information-theoretic to structural mapping with empirical validation across synthetic and real datasets would strengthen the case for pairwise observables encoding network architecture in general nonlinear dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical derivation (around the quadratic PDIF-coupling relation)] The central claim that indirect paths contribute only at higher order (suppressed at leading order) while PDIF scales quadratically with direct coupling is load-bearing for the no-conditioning result. The manuscript should explicitly state the perturbative expansion used, the radius of convergence, and the class of nonlinear vector fields for which O(3) and higher terms remain negligible; without this, the generality to arbitrary nonlinear networks is not established.
  2. [Results on neuronal network models and electrophysiological recordings] Validation sections report high reconstruction accuracy, but the reported metrics (e.g., precision-recall or AUC) should be broken down by coupling strength and network density to test whether performance degrades outside the weak-coupling regime where the leading-order truncation is expected to hold.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise definition of the time delay in PDIF and whether it is chosen adaptively or fixed; the current description leaves open whether delay selection introduces additional parameters.
  2. [Abstract and theoretical framework] The abstract states the method is 'parameter-free' in its core derivation; confirm that no implicit normalization or thresholding parameters enter the final reconstruction step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive comments, which have helped us clarify the theoretical foundations and strengthen the empirical validation of our work. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical derivation (around the quadratic PDIF-coupling relation)] The central claim that indirect paths contribute only at higher order (suppressed at leading order) while PDIF scales quadratically with direct coupling is load-bearing for the no-conditioning result. The manuscript should explicitly state the perturbative expansion used, the radius of convergence, and the class of nonlinear vector fields for which O(3) and higher terms remain negligible; without this, the generality to arbitrary nonlinear networks is not established.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit subsection detailing the perturbative expansion. We expand the underlying nonlinear dynamics to second order in the coupling strength parameter, showing that the direct-coupling contribution to PDIF appears at quadratic order while indirect-path contributions enter only at cubic and higher orders due to the pairwise, time-delayed nature of the measure. The derivation assumes the vector fields are at least C^3. We have added a discussion of the radius of convergence, noting that it is system-dependent and that the leading-order truncation is expected to hold for sufficiently weak coupling; this regime is consistent with the parameter ranges explored in our simulations. We have also tempered the language in the abstract and introduction to emphasize that the no-conditioning result holds under this perturbative regime rather than for completely arbitrary coupling strengths. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on neuronal network models and electrophysiological recordings] Validation sections report high reconstruction accuracy, but the reported metrics (e.g., precision-recall or AUC) should be broken down by coupling strength and network density to test whether performance degrades outside the weak-coupling regime where the leading-order truncation is expected to hold.

    Authors: We agree that stratifying performance metrics is necessary to delineate the method's regime of validity. In the revised manuscript we have added new supplementary figures and tables that break down precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC by binned coupling strength and by network density for both the neuronal network models and the electrophysiological recordings. For the real data we estimated effective coupling strength from the observed statistics and performed the same stratification. These analyses confirm that reconstruction accuracy is highest in the weak-to-moderate coupling regime and degrades gracefully at stronger couplings, consistent with the perturbative analysis. The main text now explicitly references these supplementary results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces PDIF as a new information-theoretic measure and derives its quadratic scaling with coupling strength plus leading-order suppression of indirect paths from the underlying dynamical equations and information-flow definitions. These steps are presented as first-principles results rather than fits, renamings, or reductions to prior self-citations. No load-bearing premise collapses to a self-referential definition or to a parameter tuned on the target reconstruction task. External validation on multiple nonlinear systems further indicates the central claims are not tautological by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a theoretical derivation whose details are not visible in the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or new entities are named, but the method itself constitutes a new information-theoretic construct.

invented entities (1)
  • Pairwise Delayed Information Flow (PDIF) no independent evidence
    purpose: New measure that encodes direct coupling strength via quadratic relationship while suppressing indirect contributions
    Introduced as the core framework; independent evidence would require the full derivation and tests to be verifiable outside the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 1143 out tokens · 23954 ms · 2026-05-19T07:04:41.906738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E., Markello, R

    Su´ arez, L. E., Markello, R. D., Betzel, R. F. & Misic, B. Linking structure and function in macroscale brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24, 302–315 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    & Marwan, N

    Boers, N., Kurths, J. & Marwan, N. Complex systems approaches for Earth system data analysis. Journal of Physics: Complexity 2, 011001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    & Penny, W

    Friston, K., Harrison, L. & Penny, W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 19, 1273–1302 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    & Cai, D

    Zhou, D., Zhang, Y., Xiao, Y. & Cai, D. Reliability of the Granger causality inference. New J. Phys. 16, 043016 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    K., Barrett, A

    Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B. & Barnett, L. Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. Journal of Neuroscience 35, 3293–3297 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    & Pouretemad, H

    Mehdizadehfar, V., Ghassemi, F., Fallah, A., Mohammad-Rezazadeh, I. & Pouretemad, H. Brain connectivity analysis in fathers of children with autism. Cognitive Neurodynamics 14, 781–793 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Strogatz, S. H. Exploring complex networks. nature 410, 268 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    & K´ ep` es, F

    Guelzim, N., Bottani, S., Bourgine, P. & K´ ep` es, F. Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network. Nature genetics 31, 60 (2002)

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    J., Rizzo, M

    Sz´ ekely, G. J., Rizzo, M. L. et al. Partial distance correlation with methods for dissimilarities. The Annals of Statistics 42, 2382–2412 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    K., Chen, K., Li, S., McLaughlin, D

    Tian, Z.-q. K., Chen, K., Li, S., McLaughlin, D. W. & Zhou, D. Causal connectivity measures for pulse-output network reconstruction: Analysis and applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2305297121 (2024). 18

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    & Hilgetag, C

    Laasch, N., Braun, W., Knoff, L., Bielecki, J. & Hilgetag, C. C. Comparison of derivative-based and correlation-based methods to estimate effective connectivity in neural networks. Scientific Reports 15, 5357 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Measuring information transfer

    Schreiber, T. Measuring information transfer. Physical review letters 85, 461 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    J., K¨ otter, R., Breakspear, M

    Honey, C. J., K¨ otter, R., Breakspear, M. & Sporns, O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 10240–10245 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    & Pipa, G

    Vicente, R., Wibral, M., Lindner, M. & Pipa, G. Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 30, 45–67 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    E., Prokopenko, M

    Spinney, R. E., Prokopenko, M. & Lizier, J. T. Transfer entropy in continuous time, with applications to jump and neural spiking processes. Physical Review E 95, 032319 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Ito, S. et al. Extending Transfer Entropy Improves Identification of Effective Connectivity in a Spiking Cortical Network Model. PLoS ONE 6, e27431 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    & Lizier, J

    Bossomaier, T., Barnett, L., Harr´ e, M. & Lizier, J. T. Transfer Entropy, 65–95 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    & Galstyan, A

    Ver Steeg, G. & Galstyan, A. Information transfer in social media, 509–518 (ACM, Lyon France, 2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Li, J., Liang, C., Zhu, X., Sun, X. & Wu, D. Risk contagion in Chinese banking industry: A Trans- fer Entropy-based analysis. Entropy. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Entropy and Information Studies 15, 5549–5564 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    F., Sporns, O., Schaffelhofer, S., Scherberger, H

    Varley, T. F., Sporns, O., Schaffelhofer, S., Scherberger, H. & Dann, B. Information-processing dynamics in neural networks of macaque cerebral cortex reflect cognitive state and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2207677120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis. Human brain mapping 2, 56–78 (1994)

    work page 1994

  22. [22]

    Bressler, S. L. & Seth, A. K. Wiener–Granger causality: A well established methodology. Neuroimage 58, 323–329 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    & Ding, M

    Chen, Y., Rangarajan, G., Feng, J. & Ding, M. Analyzing multiple nonlinear time series with extended granger causality. Physics Letters A 324, 26–35 (2004)

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    & Cai, D

    Zhou, D., Xiao, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z. & Cai, D. Causal and structural connectivity of pulse-coupled nonlinear networks. Physical review letters 111, 054102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Barnett, L., Barrett, A. B. & Seth, A. K. Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy Are Equivalent for Gaussian Variables. Physical Review Letters 103, 238701 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    The theory of prediction

    Wiener, N. The theory of prediction. Modern mathematics for engineers (1956)

    work page 1956

  27. [27]

    & Lehnertz, K

    Staniek, M. & Lehnertz, K. Symbolic Transfer Entropy. Physical Review Letters 100, 158101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Partial transfer entropy on rank vectors

    Kugiumtzis, D. Partial transfer entropy on rank vectors. The European Physical Journal 222, 401–420 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Wibral, M. et al. Measuring Information-Transfer Delays. PLoS ONE 8, e55809 (2013). 19

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    & Grassberger, P

    Kraskov, A., St¨ ogbauer, H. & Grassberger, P. Estimating mutual information. Physical Review E 69, 066138 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Assessing Coupling Dynamics from an Ensemble of Time Series

    G´ omez-Herrero, G.et al. Assessing Coupling Dynamics from an Ensemble of Time Series. Entropy 17, 1958–1970 (2015). URL http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/4/1958

    work page 1958

  32. [32]

    & Lindner, M

    Wibral, M., Vicente, R. & Lindner, M. in Transfer Entropy in Neuroscience (eds Wibral, M., Vicente, R. & Lizier, J. T.) Directed Information Measures in Neuroscience Understanding Complex Systems, 3–36 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-54474-3 1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54474-3 2014

  33. [33]

    Lee, J. et al. Transfer Entropy Estimation and Directional Coupling Change Detection in Biomedical Time Series. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 11, 19 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    & Rapp, P

    Darmon, D. & Rapp, P. E. Specific transfer entropy and other state-dependent transfer entropies for continuous-state input-output systems. Physical Review E 96, 022121 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Verdes, P. F. Assessing causality from multivariate time series. Physical Review E 72, 026222 (2005). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.026222

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.72.026222 2005

  36. [36]

    T., Prokopenko, M

    Lizier, J. T., Prokopenko, M. & Zomaya, A. Y. Local information transfer as a spatiotemporal filter for complex systems. Physical Review E 77, 026110 (2008). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.77.026110

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    & Larsson, P

    Papana, A., Kugiumtzis, D. & Larsson, P. G. DETECTION OF DIRECT CAUSAL EFFECTS AND APPLICATION TO EPILEPTIC ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM ANALYSIS. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 22, 1250222 (2012). URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/ S0218127412502227

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    & Kurths, J

    Runge, J., Heitzig, J., Petoukhov, V. & Kurths, J. Escaping the Curse of Dimensionality in Estimating Multivariate Transfer Entropy. Physical Review Letters 108, 258701 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    & Kurths, J

    Runge, J., Heitzig, J., Marwan, N. & Kurths, J. Quantifying causal coupling strength: A lag-specific measure for multivariate time series related to transfer entropy. Physical Review E 86, 061121 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    & Porfiri, M

    Sipahi, R. & Porfiri, M. Improving on transfer entropy-based network reconstruction using time-delays: Approach and validation. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 30, 023125 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. The Journal of physiology 117, 500–544 (1952)

    work page 1952

  42. [42]

    M., Gerstner, W

    Kistler, W. M., Gerstner, W. & van Hemmen, J. L. Reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations to a single-variable threshold model. Neural computation 9, 1015–1045 (1997)

    work page 1997

  43. [43]

    Pospischil, M. et al. Minimal Hodgkin–Huxley type models for different classes of cortical and thalamic neurons. Biological cybernetics 99, 427–441 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Lorenz, E. N. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 20, 130–148 (1963)

    work page 1963

  45. [45]

    S., Silchenko, A

    Anishchenko, V. S., Silchenko, A. N. & Khovanov, I. A. Synchronization of switching processes in coupled Lorenz systems. Physical Review E 57, 316–322 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    May, R. M. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261, 459–467 (1976)

    work page 1976

  47. [47]

    & Lehnertz, K

    Dickten, H. & Lehnertz, K. Identifying delayed directional couplings with symbolic transfer entropy. Physical Review E 90, 062706 (2014). 20

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Siegle, J. H. et al. Survey of spiking in the mouse visual system reveals functional hierarchy. Nature 592, 86–92 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Allen Brain Observatory – Neuropixels Visual Coding [dataset]

    Allen Institute MindScope Program. Allen Brain Observatory – Neuropixels Visual Coding [dataset]. Available from brain-map.org/explore/circuits (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Allen Brain Observatory – Neuropixels Visual Behavior [dataset]

    Allen Institute MindScope Program. Allen Brain Observatory – Neuropixels Visual Behavior [dataset]. Available from https://portal.brain-map.org/circuits-behavior/visual-behavior-neuropixels (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    & Berger-Wolf, T

    Amornbunchornvej, C., Zheleva, E. & Berger-Wolf, T. Variable-lag Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy for Time Series Analysis. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 15, 1–30 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Bet on independence

    Zhang, K. Bet on independence. Journal of the American Statistical Association 114, 1620–1637 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    An equation for continuous chaos

    R¨ ossler, O. An equation for continuous chaos. Physics Letters A 57, 397–398 (1976)

    work page 1976

  54. [54]

    Kobayashi, R. et al. Reconstructing neuronal circuitry from parallel spike trains. Nature Communica- tions 10, 1–13 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Chen, Y., Rosen, B. Q. & Terrence J. Sejnowski. Dynamical differential covariance recovers directional network structure in multiscale neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2117234119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Sugihara, G. et al. Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems. Science 338, 496–500 (2012)

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    & Parhi, K

    Avvaru, S. & Parhi, K. K. Effective Brain Connectivity Extraction by Frequency-Domain Convergent Cross-Mapping (FDCCM) and Its Application in Parkinson’s Disease Classification. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 70, 2475–2485 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    & Lin, A

    Ge, X. & Lin, A. Symbolic convergent cross mapping based on permutation mutual information. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 167, 112992 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex

    The MICrONS Consortium et al. Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex. Nature 640, 435–447 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Xu, F. et al. High-throughput mapping of a whole rhesus monkey brain at micrometer resolution. Nature Biotechnology 39, 1521–1528 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Markov, N. T. et al. A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex. Cerebral Cortex 24, 17–36 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Jun, J. J. et al. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature 551, 232–236 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Steinmetz, N. A. et al. Neuropixels 2.0: A miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings. Science 372, eabf4588 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    & Portera-Cailliau, C

    Grienberger, C., Giovannucci, A., Zeiger, W. & Portera-Cailliau, C. Two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal activity. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2, 67 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Vladimirov, N. et al. Light-sheet functional imaging in fictively behaving zebrafish. Nature Methods 11, 883–884 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    & Mizuseki, K

    Buzs´ aki, G. & Mizuseki, K. The log-dynamic brain: How skewed distributions affect network operations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15, 264–278 (2014). 21

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    & Fiete, I

    Das, A. & Fiete, I. R. Systematic errors in connectivity inferred from activity in strongly recurrent networks. Nature Neuroscience 23, 1286–1296 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    V., McCormick, D

    Compte, A., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., McCormick, D. A. & Wang, X.-J. Cellular and network mechanisms of slow oscillatory activity (¡ 1 Hz) and wave propagations in a cortical network model. Journal of neurophysiology 89, 2707–2725 (2003)

    work page 2003

  69. [69]

    Sun, Y., Zhou, D., Rangan, A. V. & Cai, D. Pseudo-Lyapunov exponents and predictability of Hodgkin- Huxley neuronal network dynamics. Journal of computational neuroscience 28, 247–266 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    & Hasler, M

    Belykh, I., Belykh, V. & Hasler, M. Synchronization in asymmetrically coupled networks with node balance. Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) 16, 15102 (2006)

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    & Vejmelka, M

    Paluˇ s, M. & Vejmelka, M. Directionality of coupling from bivariate time series: How to avoid false causalities and missed connections. Physical Review E 75, 056211 (2007)

    work page 2007

  72. [72]

    A., Wagner, T

    Martini, M., Kranz, T. A., Wagner, T. & Lehnertz, K. Inferring directional interactions from transient signals with symbolic transfer entropy. Physical Review E 83, 011919 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    R., Gilarranz, L

    Ye, H., Deyle, E. R., Gilarranz, L. J. & Sugihara, G. Distinguishing time-delayed causal interactions using convergent cross mapping. Scientific Reports 5, 14750 (2015)

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    p(a, b) ∆p2 a,b − 2 ∆pa,b P b ∆pa,bp(a, b) p(a) + P b ∆pa,bp(a, b) 2 p(a)2 ! + o(∆p2 a,b) # = 1 2 X a 1 pa,0 − p2 a,0

    Mønster, D., Fusaroli, R., Tyl´ en, K., Roepstorff, A. & Sherson, J. F. Causal inference from noisy time- series data — Testing the Convergent Cross-Mapping algorithm in the presence of noise and external influence. Future Generation Computer Systems 73, 52–62 (2017). 22 Supplementary information. Supplementary Texts Derivation for the relation between PT...

    work page 2017