Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 80 references

On Demographic Transformation: Why We Need to Think Beyond Silos

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Siloed demographic policy fails both young and old, the paper argues, because aging and low birth rates are one interconnected challenge that demands transdisciplinary co-creation.

desk verdict A readable, well-cited position paper on demographics and AI in elder care whose central 'essential' transdisciplinarity claim is asserted, not demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03129 v1 pith:OZBYLJDP submitted 2025-07-03 cs.CY

Nicholle Mae Amor Tan Maravilla , Myles Joshua Toledo Tan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CY
keywords demographictransformationagingpopulationdecliningbirthratestransdisciplinaryframeworkAIingeriatriccarereproductiverightsethicalhealthcarepolicy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Developed countries face two linked demographic pressures: populations are aging quickly and birth rates are falling, and the paper argues that treating these as separate problems guarantees inadequate policy. It reviews the drivers of declining fertility, pronatalist responses such as matchmaking programs and baby bonuses, and the growing use of AI and robotics in elder care. Its central claim is that only a transdisciplinary framework, in which policymakers, clinicians, engineers, ethicists, and older adults co-create solutions, can produce ethical and sustainable responses. A sympathetic reader would care because the paper reframes demographic policy from a narrow fertility problem to a question of intergenerational solidarity and technology governance.

What carries the argument

The central object is the proposed transdisciplinary framework, defined as co-creation of knowledge and solutions by academic researchers and non-academic stakeholders such as policymakers, healthcare professionals, engineers, ethicists, community members, and affected individuals. The framework rests on six principles: shared problem definition, inclusive stakeholder engagement, iterative co-creation and knowledge integration, ethical integration and trust-building, capacity building and mutual learning, and flexible governance and adaptive management. A second named mechanism is the human-AI system of intelligent caring, a six-element model for awareness, understanding, connection, judgment, intention, and reflection that the paper adopts to keep AI tools supportive of compassionate care rather than replacements for it.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison of two matched regions, one running a pronatalist incentive program only and the other running a transdisciplinary program that also addresses housing, caregiving, and older-adult needs, could settle the claim if it tracked fertility, healthy life expectancy, caregiver wellbeing, and public trust in AI over a decade. If the siloed region matched or outperformed the transdisciplinary one on those outcomes, the paper's central recommendation would lose its empirical basis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that current, often siloed, policy responses are inadequate for the interconnected challenges of aging and low fertility, and that a comprehensive, transdisciplinary framework is essential. It argues that pronatalist policies that focus only on raising birth rates overlook the equally urgent needs of older adults and the structural reasons people delay or forgo children. The paper reviews evidence that fertility decline is driven by human capital, urbanization costs, cultural change, infertility, mental health, and abortion law, and that aging strains health systems and labor markets. It concludes that AI and robotics can support geriatric care only if designed through iterative co-creation with clinicians and older adults, governed by ethical principles such as data privacy, human oversight, and compassionate care.

Load-bearing premise

The framework's effectiveness rests on the premise that transdisciplinary co-creation produces better demographic policy outcomes than current sectoral approaches; the paper asserts this premise but does not empirically test it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the framework is adopted, fertility policy would shift from financial incentives toward addressing housing costs, career opportunity costs, and reproductive freedom.
  • Geriatric care AI would be co-designed with older adults, with privacy and compassion built in from the start rather than added after deployment.
  • Workforce migration would be treated as a global equity issue, with ethical recruitment guidelines and investment in healthcare infrastructure in source countries.
  • Academic and institutional incentives would be reformed to reward team achievements, making transdisciplinary work sustainable.
  • AI adoption in elder care would be measured by user trust, acceptance, and caregiver wellbeing, not by technical capability alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to compare jurisdictions that adopt transdisciplinary demographic strategies against those relying on pronatalist incentives, tracking fertility, healthy longevity, and caregiver burden over a decade.
  • The framework implies that AI for elder care should be evaluated not only on clinical accuracy but on whether it reduces moral distress among caregivers, a metric the paper mentions but does not operationalize.
  • If transdisciplinarity is the key, demographic policy research itself would need to move from disciplinary publication toward community-embedded pilot programs; the paper's examples from climate and agroecology suggest such pilots would have to be adapted and measured rather than assumed to transfer.
  • The emphasis on reproductive freedom suggests that demographic policy should be evaluated against human rights criteria, not just population totals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a narrative review of demographic transformation in developed countries, focusing on declining birth rates and population aging. It reviews socioeconomic, sociocultural, and health-related drivers of fertility decline; pronatalist and matchmaking policies; the impact of longer life expectancy on healthcare systems; and opportunities and challenges of AI and robotics in geriatric care. The authors then argue that current, often siloed, policy responses are inadequate for these interconnected issues and propose a transdisciplinary framework that unites policymakers, healthcare professionals, engineers, ethicists, and community stakeholders in co-creating solutions. The framework is summarized in six principles and a table mapping principles to demographic challenges, stakeholders, and example actions. The paper presents no original data or fitted models; its contribution is a policy-oriented synthesis and a normative proposal.

Significance. If accepted as a policy orientation, the paper would give demographic policy a broad, cross-sectoral agenda and useful process guidance for stakeholder engagement, including concrete recommendations such as shared visioning workshops, memoranda of understanding, conflict-resolution protocols, and incentive reform. The descriptive sections are broad and reasonably consistent with the cited literature, and the authors explicitly acknowledge in the Conclusion that the effectiveness of transdisciplinary frameworks has not been empirically assessed, which is an honest limitation. However, the paper's central normative claim that such a framework is 'essential' is supported only by cross-domain analogies and definitional distinctions, not by comparative evidence on demographic policy outcomes. Its value is therefore as a position piece and a provisional framework, not as an empirically established result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §VII; Conclusion] The load-bearing claim that current 'siloed' policy responses are 'inadequate' and that a transdisciplinary framework is 'essential' is not supported by the evidence provided. Section VI offers analogies from dementia collaborative care (Galvin et al., 2014), African-city climate partnerships (McClure et al., 2024), and agroecology, but none is a demographic policy compared against a sectoral or interdisciplinary alternative on fertility, aging, or migration outcomes. The Conclusion itself states that 'Future research should empirically assess the effectiveness of transdisciplinary frameworks,' which concedes that the central premise is untested. The paper should either reframe the recommendation as a hypothesis or a process-design proposal, or supply comparative case evidence showing that transdisciplinary demographic governance outperforms integrated sectoral or interdisciplinary approaches on specified outcomes.
  2. [§VI] The assertion that multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations 'may fall short' and that transdisciplinarity 'uniquely offers' integrated thinking is definitional rather than empirical. The paper distinguishes these approaches conceptually, but it provides no criterion or evidence for when the added co-creation component changes demographic policy outcomes. Because this distinction is load-bearing for the framework's justification, the paper needs to specify measurable outcomes (for example, policy adoption, intergenerational equity, cost-effectiveness, or user trust) and at least illustrate how transdisciplinary co-creation would be evaluated against the alternatives it criticizes.
  3. [§II–III; Abstract] The characterization of existing policies as 'siloed' and as overlooking the urgent needs of older adults is not established. The paper cites pronatalist and matchmaking policies in Japan, China, Korea, and elsewhere, but does not examine whether those governments simultaneously operate active-aging or long-term-care policies; indeed, Section IV acknowledges many aging-related policy efforts in the same countries. The argument would be stronger if it identified a specific policy domain where fertility and aging policies are actually uncoordinated, rather than treating pronatalism as representative of the whole policy response.
minor comments (6)
  1. [References] Reference 37 lists 'McClure, A. (2024)' while the text cites 'McClure et al. (2024)'; the reference entry should include the full author list or the citation should be made consistent.
  2. [References] The text uses 'WHO, 2024a' and 'WHO, 2024b' in Section II, but the reference list entries for WHO (2024) do not carry 'a' and 'b' labels; the labels should be added to the corresponding references.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 appears after the Conclusion rather than in Section VII where it is first discussed; it should be moved to Section VII for readability.
  4. [§V] The CarePredict outcomes ('40 percent reduction in hospitalizations and a 60 percent reduction in falls') are attributed to a vendor website; these should be labeled as vendor-reported or replaced with peer-reviewed evaluations.
  5. [References] Reference 24 contains a typo: 'Hole cki' should be 'Holecki'.
  6. [References] Reference 58 is formatted inconsistently, with 'The Lancet (ed)' appearing as the author; the editorial authorship should be corrected or the citation style aligned with the rest of the reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a policy-position review, not a derivation; the self-citations are non-load-bearing and the central recommendation rests on external literature and analogies.

full rationale

This paper makes no empirical derivation, fits no parameters, and produces no prediction that could be equivalent to an input by construction. Its descriptive demographic claims are sourced from WHO, WEF, and peer-reviewed literature; its AI and ethics sections cite external studies; and the transdisciplinarity recommendation is argued by analogy (Galvin et al. 2014 on dementia care; McClure et al. 2024 on African-city climate partnerships; agroecology). The closest structural concern is that Section VI defines transdisciplinary collaboration as an approach that "more effectively addresses complex, real-world challenges," and Section VII then concludes that complex demographic problems require transdisciplinarity; but the paper does not define the demographic problem in terms of transdisciplinarity, and no quantitative result is derived, so this is rhetorical overreach and missing evidence rather than a definitional reduction. The Conclusion's statement that "Future research should empirically assess the effectiveness of transdisciplinary frameworks" is an explicit admission that the central premise is untested, which weakens the normative claim but is not circularity. The self-citations (e.g., Tan & Benos 2025 for "a transdisciplinary strategy ... can lead to more ethical, equitable, and context-sensitive AI tools") support sub-claims and are accompanied by independent examples and external references, so they are not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No parameters were fitted because the paper is not quantitative. The central claim depends on normative domain assumptions about the necessity and superiority of transdisciplinary collaboration, all of which are asserted with reference to adjacent fields rather than demonstrated for demographic policy.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Demographic challenges are deeply interconnected and systemic, so siloed or disciplinary responses are inadequate.
    Central premise introduced in the abstract and restated in Section VII. No comparative evidence is provided that integrated approaches outperform targeted ones.
  • domain assumption Transdisciplinary collaboration, with active involvement of non-academic stakeholders, is superior to multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary approaches for demographic problems.
    Asserted in Sections VI and VII. Supporting examples come from climate risk, agroecology, and dementia care, not from demographic policy outcomes, so the superiority is assumed.
  • domain assumption AI and robotics can, if ethically governed, meaningfully improve geriatric care.
    Used in Section V to motivate the framework. The paper cites prior reviews and product claims, and does not run any experiment or implementation.
invented entities (1)
  • Transdisciplinary framework for demographic transformation
    purpose: A policy coordination structure that co-creates solutions with academics, policymakers, healthcare professionals, engineers, ethicists, and community stakeholders across fertility, aging, and AI integration.
    The framework is the paper's central proposal, but it is a compilation of principles from existing transdisciplinary literature with no pilot, implementation, or measurable outcome. It makes no falsifiable prediction that could fail, so it functions as an invented conceptual entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Demographic Transformation: Why We Need to Think Beyond Silos." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OZBYLJDP

@misc{pith2026250703129,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Demographic Transformation: Why We Need to Think Beyond Silos},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OZBYLJDP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03129}
}
read the original abstract

Developed nations are undergoing a profound demographic transformation, characterized by rapidly aging populations and declining birth rates. This dual trend places unprecedented strain on healthcare systems, economies, and social support structures, creating complex biological, economic, and social challenges. This paper argues that current, often siloed, policy responses, such as pronatalist initiatives that overlook the equally urgent needs of older adults, are inadequate for addressing these interconnected issues. We propose that a comprehensive, transdisciplinary framework is essential for developing sustainable and ethical solutions. Through a review of demographic drivers, policy responses, and technological advancements, we analyze the limitations of fragmented approaches and explore the potential of innovative interventions. Specifically, we examine the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in transforming geriatric care. While these technologies offer powerful tools for personalizing treatment, enhancing diagnostics, and enabling remote monitoring, their integration presents significant challenges. These include ethical concerns regarding data privacy and compassionate care, the need for human oversight to ensure accuracy, and practical barriers related to cost, interoperability, and user acceptance. To navigate this demographic shift effectively, we conclude by advocating for a transdisciplinary framework that unites policymakers, healthcare professionals, engineers, ethicists, and community stakeholders. By co-creating solutions that ethically integrate technology and prioritize human dignity, societies can build resilient systems that promote healthy longevity and well-being for all generations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This collective understanding is essential to avoid team goal misalignment within the team

    Shared Problem Definition and Goal Alignment: The framework must begin with all participants, academic and non-academic alike, collaboratively defining the problem based on their varied perspectives. This collective understanding is essential to avoid team goal misalignment within the team. For example, addressing declining birth rates would require input...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Their lived experiences and insights are crucial for ensuring that research and solutions are practical, relevant, and responsive to real-world needs

    Inclusive Stakeholder Engagement: The framework requires the meaningful involvement of a wide range of stakeholders, including healthcare providers, social workers, policymakers, AI developers, and community members such as older adults and those facing infertility. Their lived experiences and insights are crucial for ensuring that research and solutions ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This includes both structured and informal exchanges

    Iterative Co-creation and Knowledge Integration: Rather than relying on isolated contributions from each field, the framework promotes an ongoing, interactive process of dialogue and knowledge integration. This includes both structured and informal exchanges. For example, in the development of AI for elder care, continuous feedback from clinicians and old...

    work page

  4. [4]

    This includes patient privacy, compassionate care, and the responsible use of personal data

    Ethical Integration and Trust-Building: Ethical concerns must be addressed from the beginning of any initiative. This includes patient privacy, compassionate care, and the responsible use of personal data. Ethicists, legal professionals, and patient advocates should work closely with technologists to ensure that systems comply with ethical frameworks such...

    work page

  5. [5]

    vital 'champions' who bridged divides and fostered teamwork,

    Capacity Building and Mutual Learning: The framework should foster a reciprocal learning environment where all participants gain a deeper understanding of other disciplines' perspectives and methodologies. This helps bridge university-community disconnects and improves knowledge sharing . Non-academic participants, with their practical experience and comm...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Flexible Governance and Adaptive Management: Recognizing that organizational politics and conflict resolution issues can hinder collaboration, the framework calls for clear communication channels, established conflict resolution mechanisms, and strong leadership support. Policies should be regularly reviewed and adjusted to explicitly favor and reward tea...

    work page

  7. [7]

    This continuous feedback loop enables adaptive adjustments to team structure and processes, ultimately fostering a more cohesive and effective collaborative environment

    Limited Insight into Team Dynamics: To address the lack of understanding regarding how team members view, support, and engage in collaboration, the framework recommends regular reflection sessions and embedded qualitative research within teams. This continuous feedback loop enables adaptive adjustments to team structure and processes, ultimately fostering...

    work page

  8. [8]

    These agreements outline roles, responsibilities, and shared objectives, ensuring institutional accountability

    Organizational Politics & University-Community Disconnects: To overcome internal institutional politics and the disconnect between academic institutions and community needs, the framework calls for the establishment of formal memoranda of understanding (MOUs) or partnership agreements. These agreements outline roles, responsibilities, and shared objective...

    work page

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    These sessions allow all stakeholders to co-develop and commit to overarching goals and targeted outcomes

    Team Goal Misalignment: To address differing objectives among team members, the framework prioritizes participatory methods such as shared visioning workshops at the project’s outset. These sessions allow all stakeholders to co-develop and commit to overarching goals and targe...

  2. [10]

    Scheduled inter-group meetings, cross-disciplinary training sessions, and the pursuit of joint publications promote knowledge transfer and integration

    Poor Knowledge Sharing: To improve the flow of information, the framework recommends the use of shared digital platforms for document storage, communication, and data sharing. Scheduled inter-group meetings, cross-disciplinary training sessions, and the pursuit of joint public...

  3. [11]

    A neutral facilitator or mediator may be designated to guide the process

    Conflict Resolution Issues: To proactively address disagreements within the team, the framework includes the establishment of clear protocols for conflict resolution. A neutral facilitator or mediator may be designated to guide the process. Emphasis is placed on open dialogue,...

  4. [12]

    Policies Favoring Individual Achievements: To shift incentives toward collaboration, the framework advocates for policy reforms at the institutional level. These reforms would formally recognize collaborative accomplishments, such as interdisciplinary publications, joint grant...

  5. [13]

    Declining Birth Rates: To tackle declining birth rates, a transdisciplinary approach would involve a diverse group of stakeholders, including demographers, economists, sociologists, public health experts (focusing on infertility and mental health), ethicists, urban planners, w...

  6. [14]

    Aging Population and Healthcare: For the aging population and healthcare, stakeholders would include geriatricians, nurses, social workers, physical therapists, urban planners, economists, policymakers, AI developers, older adults themselves, and their caregivers. Co-creation ...

  7. [15]

    what AI can do

    AI Integration in Healthcare: The integration of AI in healthcare requires stakeholders such as AI developers, ethicists, legal experts, clinicians, patients (especially older adults), policymakers, and social scientists. Through co-creation, AI systems can be developed that a...

    2006

  8. [16]

    Alowais, S.A., Alghamdi, S.S., Alsuhebany, N. et al. (2023). Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 23, 689. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Aluttis, C., Bishaw, T., Frank, M.W. (2014). The workforce for health in a globalized context--global shortages and international migration. Glob Health Action . 7:23611. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23611

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    and Shaban, M

    Badawy, W. and Shaban, M. (2025). Exploring geriatric nurses' perspectives on the adoption of AI in elderly care a qualitative study. Geriatric Nursing. 61: 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.10.078

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Bernstein, M.H., Atalay, M.K., Dibble, E.H., Maxwell, A.W.P., Karam, A.R., et al (2023). Can incorrect artificial intelligence (AI) results impact radiologists, and if so, what can we do about it? A multi-reader pilot study of lung cancer detection with chest radiography. Eur ...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Rethinking Population Policies: A Reproductive Rights Framework

    Center for Reproductive Rights (2003). Rethinking Population Policies: A Reproductive Rights Framework . Retrieved from: https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/pub_bP_rethinki ngpop.pdf. Accessed on: January 16, 2025

    2003

  13. [21]

    The World’s Abortion Laws

    Center for Reproductive Rights (2024). The World’s Abortion Laws . Retrieved from: https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/. Accessed on January 14, 2025

    2024

  14. [22]

    Chai, X. (2021). Exploring the Politics of Sensibilities That Promote Marriage and Reproduction Among Young Chinese Adults Residing in Urban Areas. In: Scribano, A., Camarena Luhrs, M., Cervio, A.L. (eds) Cities, Capitalism and the Politics of Sensibilities. Palgrave Macmillan...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Cordero D. (2024). The downsides of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Korean J Pain . 37(1):87-88. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23312. 11. Council on Foreign Relations (2024). China’s Population Decline Continues. Retrieved from: https://www.cfr.org/blog/chinas-population-decline-con...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Cylus, J., Figueras, J., Normand, C., authors; Sagan A, Richardson E, North J, et al., editors. (2019). Will Population Ageing Spell the End of the Welfare State? A review of evidence and policy options [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems a...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 6(2):94-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    European Commission (2018). As Europe ages, could robots help care for seniors? Retrieved from: https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/projects/success-stories/all/europe-ag es-could-robots-help-care-seniors. Accessed on January 13, 2025

    2018

  19. [27]

    Ezeudoka, B.C., and Fan, M. (2024). Exploring the impact of digital distrust on user resistance to e-health services among older adults: the moderating effect of anticipated regret. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 11, 1190. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03457-9

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Furstenberg, F.F. (2019). Family Change in Global Perspective: How and Why Family Systems Change. Fam Relat . 68(3):326-341. doi: 10.1111/fare.12361

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Galvin JE, Valois L, Zweig Y. (2014). Collaborative transdisciplinary team approach for dementia care. Neurodegener Dis Manag . 4(6):455-69. doi: 10.2217/nmt.14.47

    2014 doi

  22. [30]

    Garcia-Oliveira, P., Fraga-Corral, M., Carpena, M., Prieto, M.A., and Simal-Gandara, J. (2022). Chapter 2 - Approaches for sustainable food production and consumption systems. Future Foods. 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91001-9.00006-2

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Gietel-Basten, S., Rotkirch, A., Sobotka, T. (2022). Changing the perspective on low birth rates: why simplistic solutions won’t work. BMJ . 379:e072670. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072670

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Golovina, K., Elovainio, M., and Hakulinen, C. (2023). Association between depression and the likelihood of having children: a nationwide register study in Finland. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 228(2):211.e1-211.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.016

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Harper, S. (2019). Living Longer within Ageing Societies. Population Ageing 12 , 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-019-09248-4

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Hazarika, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence: opportunities and implications for the health workforce. Int Health . 12(4):241-245. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa007

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    G., Karim, H

    Hinostroza Fuentes, V. G., Karim, H. A., Tan, M. J. T., & AlDahoul, N. (2025). AI with agency: a vision for adaptive, efficient, and ethical healthcare. Frontiers in Digital Health , 7 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1600216

    2025

  28. [36]

    Hole cki, T., Rogalska, A., Sobczyk, K., Wozniack-Holecka, J., and Romaniuk, P. (2020). Global Elderly Migrations and Their Impact on Health Care Systems. Frontiers in Public Health . Vol 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00386

    2020

  29. [37]

    Huang, R., Yu, JY., He, WC. et al. (2024). Feasibility analysis of China's medical insurance coverage of assisted reproductive technology. Sci Rep. 14, 7998. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58640-4

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    et al (2022)

    Jacobi, J., Llanque, A., Mukhovi, S.M., Birachi, E., von Groote, P., Eschen, R. et al (2022). Transdisciplinary co-creation increases the utilization of knowledge from sustainable development research. Env Sci Pol . 129: 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.017

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Jones, C.H., and Dolsten, M. (2024). Healthcare on the brink: navigating the challenges of an aging society in the United States. npj Aging . 10, 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-024-00148-2

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Kane P, Choi CY. (1999). China's one child family policy. BMJ . 319(7215):992-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7215.992

    1999 doi

  33. [41]

    Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Transl. by M. Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809590

    doi

  34. [42]

    Keijsers, C.J.P.W., Dreher, R., Tanner, S., Forde-Johnston, C., Thompson, S. (2016). Interprofessional education in geriatric medicine. European Geriatric Medicine . 7(4): 306-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2016.01.011

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Kerasidou A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the ongoing need for empathy, compassion and trust in healthcare. Bull World Health Organ . 98(4):245-250. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.237198

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Kugler, T., & Rhamey, J. P. (2023). People and Places: The Contextual Side of Politics in Demography and Geography. Social Sciences , 12 (8), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080456

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    Lawless MT, Tieu M, Archibald MM, Pinero De Plaza MA, Kitson AL. (2025). From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration. Qualitative Health Research. 35(1):3-16. doi:10.1177/10497323241235882

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    Lee, H. K. (2008). International marriage and the state in South Korea: focusing on governmental policy. Citizenship Studies , 12 (1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020701794240

    2008 doi

  39. [47]

    & Liu, J

    Lyu, W., Huang, Y. & Liu, J. (2024). The multifaceted influence of multidisciplinary background on placement and academic progression of faculty. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 350. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02818-8

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    and Tan, M.J.T

    Maravilla, N.M.A.T. and Tan, M.J.T. (2021). Philippine Mental Health Act: Just an Act? A Call to Look Into the Bi-directionality of Mental Health and Economy. Front. Psychol. 12:706483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706483

    2021

  41. [49]

    McClure, A. (2024). Enablers of transdisciplinary collaboration for researchers working on climate risks in African cities. Sustain Sci 19, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01426-w

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism . Kingston, NY: Parker, Son, and Bourn. 39. Morrow E, Zidaru T, Ross F, Mason C, Patel KD, Ream M, Stockley R. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review. Front Psychol . 13:971044. ...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for Cross-National Research

    National Research Council (US) Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World. Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for Cross-National Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. 6, The Health of Aging Populations . Available from: https://www...

    2001

  44. [52]

    Olshansky, S.J., Willcox, B.J., Demetrius, L. et al. (2024). Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century. Nat Aging. 4, 1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-024-00702-3

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Padhan, S., Mohapatra, A., Ramasamy, S.K., Agrawal, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotics in Elderly Healthcare: Enabling Independence and Quality of Life. Cureus. 15(8):e42905. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42905

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    The spectre of unsafe abortions in the Philippines

    Perez, J.R.M., Monteagudo, G.R.S., Nebrada, P.J.C., Arevalo, M.V.P.N., De la Paz, E.P., et al (2022). The spectre of unsafe abortions in the Philippines. Lancet Reg Health West Pac . 32:100655. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100655

    2022

  47. [55]

    Peterson, B., Boivin, J., Norré, J., Smith, C., Thorn, P., Wischmann, T. (2012). An introduction to infertility counseling: a guide for mental health and medical professionals. J Assist Reprod Genet. 29(3):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9701-y

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    Rigolot, C. (2020). Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being : complementarities and creative tensions. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 7, 100. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00598-5

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    Roser, M. (2014). Fertility Rate . Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate. Accessed on: December 8, 2024

    2014

  50. [58]

    Sander, M., Oxlund, B., Jespersen, A., Krasnik, A., Mortensen, E.L., Westendorp, R.G., Rasmussen, L.J. (2014). The challenges of human population ageing. Age Ageing . 44(2):185-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu189

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    iCubed Health and Wellness in Aging Transdisciplinary Core

    Sargent L, Slattum P, Brooks M, Gendron T, Mackiewicz M, Diallo A, et al (2022). iCubed Health and Wellness in Aging Transdisciplinary Core. Bringing Transdisciplinary Aging Research From Theory to Practice. Gerontologist . 62(2):159-168. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa214

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    Scott, A. (2021). The longevity society. The Lancet Health Longevity . 2(12): e820-e827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00247-6

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Shiwani, T., Relton, S., Evans, R., Kale, A., Heaven, A., and Clegg, A. (2023). Ageing Data Research Collaborative (Geridata) AI group; Todd O. New Horizons in artificial intelligence in the healthcare of older people. Age Ageing . 52(12):afad219. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad219

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    Privacy concerns of older adults using voice assistant systems

    Spangler, H.B., Driesse, T.M., Lynch, D.H., Liang, X., Roth, R.M., et al (2022). Privacy concerns of older adults using voice assistant systems. J Am Geriatr Soc . 70(12):3643-3647. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18009

    2022 doi

  55. [63]

    Specht A, & Crowston K. (2022). Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes. PLoS One . 17(11):e0278043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278043

    2022 doi

  56. [64]

    Global life expectancy at birth from 1950 to 2021, with projections until 2100

    Statista (2024). Global life expectancy at birth from 1950 to 2021, with projections until 2100. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/805060/life-expectancy-at-birth-worldwide/. Accessed on: December 12, 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Tan, M.J.T & Benos, P.V. (2025). Addressing Intersectionality, Explainability, and Ethics in AI-Driven Diagnostics: A Rebuttal and Call for Transdisciplinary Action. ArXiv . https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08497

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    and Maravilla, N.M.A.T

    Tan, M.J.T. and Maravilla, N.M.A.T. (2024) Shaping integrity: why generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education. Front. Artif. Intell. 7:1471224. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1471224

    2024

  59. [67]

    Health is beyond genetics: on the integration of lifestyle and environment in real-time for hyper-personalized medicine

    Tan, M.J.T., Kasireddy, H.R., Satriya, A.B., Abdul Karim, H., and AlDahoul, N (2025). Health is beyond genetics: on the integration of lifestyle and environment in real-time for hyper-personalized medicine. Front. Public Health 12:1522673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1522673

    2025

  60. [68]

    Tan, M. J. T., Lichlyter, D. A., Maravilla, N. M. A. T., Schrock, W. J., Ting, F. I. L., Choa-Go, J. M., Francisco, K. K., Byers, M. C., Karim, H. A., & AlDahoul, N. (2025). The data scientist as a mainstay of the tumor board: global implications and opportunities for the glob...

    2025

  61. [69]

    Polycystic ovary syndrome: What more can be done for patients? The Lancet (ed)

    The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (2022). Polycystic ovary syndrome: What more can be done for patients? The Lancet (ed) . 21:100524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100524

    2022

  62. [70]

    X., Vu, G

    Tran, B. X., Vu, G. T., Ha, G. H., Vuong, Q. -H., Ho, M. -T., et al (2019). Global Evolution of Research in Artificial Intelligence in Health and Medicine: A Bibliometric Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine , 8 (3), 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030360

    2019 doi

  63. [71]

    & Sun, X

    Wang, Q. & Sun, X. (2016). The Role of Socio-political and Economic Factors in Fertility Decline: A Cross-country Analysis. World Development, 87: 360-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.004

    2016 doi

  64. [72]

    Watts, J. (2002). Tokyo Japan opens dating agency to improve birth rate. The Lancet , 360(9347): 1755, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11731-4

    2002 doi

  65. [73]

    White, M.J., Muhidin, S., Andrzejewski, C., Tagoe, E., Knight, R., Reed, H. (2008). Urbanization and fertility: an event-history analysis of coastal Ghana. Demography. 45(4):803-16. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0035

    2008 doi

  66. [74]

    These are the countries most affected by the decline in working age populations

    World Economic Forum (2021). These are the countries most affected by the decline in working age populations . Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/01/declining-working-age-populations-japan-korea-ge rmany-italy-employment/. Accessed on: December 5, 2024

    2021

  67. [75]

    Why longevity literacy is the secret to a prosperous longer life

    World Economic Forum (2023). Why longevity literacy is the secret to a prosperous longer life. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/longevity-literacy-secret-to-prosperous-longer-life- davos-2023/. Accessed on: December 12, 2024

    2023

  68. [76]

    Could these old and new ideas be the future of social care for the elderly? Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/08/elderly-social-care-dementia-villages/

    World Economic Forum (2023). Could these old and new ideas be the future of social care for the elderly? Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/08/elderly-social-care-dementia-villages/. Accessed on: December 13, 2024

    2023

  69. [77]

    Ageing and health

    World Health Organization (2024). Ageing and health. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed on: December 5, 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    Infertility

    World Health Organization (2024). Infertility. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility. Accessed on: December 8, 2024

    2024

  71. [79]

    Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

    World Health Organization (2023). Polycystic Ovary Syndrome . Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/polycystic-ovary-syndrome. Accessed on: December 8, 2024

    2023

  72. [80]

    Wright, J. (2023). Robots Won’t Save Japan: An Ethnography of Eldercare Automation . Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv2fjx0br

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.