Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Very Massive Stars with the Habitable Worlds Observatory

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 5-milliarcsecond UV spectrograph on HWO would resolve individual very massive stars in clusters at 3 to 15 Mpc, growing the census from twenty to hundreds and testing how their winds depend on metallicity.

desk verdict A well-argued instrument science case whose census projections rest on an explicit, unverified assumption about VMS separations in unresolved clusters—worth refereeing but needs sharper caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03371 v1 pith:KVBZ3GAP submitted 2025-07-04 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

Fabrice Martins (1) , Aida Wofford (2) , Miriam Garcia (3) , Peter Senchyna (4) , Janice Lee (5 , 6) , Paul A. Scowen (7) ((1) CNRS , Univ. Montpellier
show 7 more authors
(2) UNAM (3) CSIC-INTA (4) Carnegie Institution for Science (5) STScI (6) University of Arizona (7) NASA/GSFC)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords verymassivestarsHabitableWorldsObservatoryintegralfieldspectrographultravioletspectroscopyHeII1640stellarclustersmass-lossmetallicitydependencediffraction-limited
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Very massive stars—stars born with more than $100\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$—are so rare and short-lived that only about twenty are firmly known, all in the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud, yet they can dominate the ultraviolet light of entire star clusters and are prime suspects behind the unusual spectra of the earliest galaxies. This paper argues that an integral-field spectrograph working at the Habitable Worlds Observatory's ultraviolet diffraction limit (about 5 milliarcseconds) with spectral resolution $R\sim2000$ would break the logjam: it could spatially separate the individual stars inside clusters at 3 to 15 Mpc that currently appear as single unresolved points, and take ultraviolet–optical spectra of each one. The payoff would be a census of hundreds rather than about twenty very massive stars, with direct measurements of temperature, luminosity, mass, and wind parameters across metallicities from about $0.1$ to $1.5\,Z_\odot$. The case matters because it identifies one concrete instrument configuration as the tool that would turn the search for the most massive stars from a Local-Group lottery into a real classification campaign.

What carries the argument

The central object is an ultraviolet integral-field spectrograph on HWO that works at the 5-milliarcsecond diffraction limit with $R\sim2000$; an integral-field spectrograph captures a full spectrum at every spatial pixel, which is what turns a blended cluster into a field of individually measurable stars. The spectral resolution of $R\sim2000$ is the specific threshold that separates the narrow C IV 5801–12 doublet from the broad emission of Wolf–Rayet stars, making the VMS identification unambiguous, and it also resolves the iron forest near 1300–1400 Å used for metallicity estimates. The physical machinery it targets is the boost of VMS mass-loss rates near the Eddington limit (the luminosity at which radiation pressure balances gravity), which is ten times stronger than an extrapolation from normal massive stars and produces the distinctive He II 1640 emission that makes VMS detectable in integrated light. The spatial template (0.04–2 pc separations in resolved clusters) carries the resolution calculation: at 3–15 Mpc those separations become 0.5–110 milliarcseconds, and the 5-mas limit is what pulls the individual stars out.

What would settle it

An observation that would settle the claim: point a 5-milliarcsecond, $R\sim2000$ ultraviolet integral-field spectrograph at NGC3125-A1. If the integrated He II 1640 emission does not split into individual point sources bearing the very-massive-star spectral pattern, or if the same observation at the nearer MrK71-A distance also fails to separate any such stars, then the claim that HWO's diffraction-limited ultraviolet spectroscopy can multiply the known very-massive-star population at these distances is wrong. A complementary calculation, using the measured 0.04–2 pc separations in R136 and NGC3603 as the prior, would predict how many candidate-cluster VMS should be resolvable at each distance; the paper's case rises or falls on that predicted resolvable fraction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that HWO's 5-milliarcsecond diffraction limit in the ultraviolet, combined with an integral-field spectrograph at $R\sim2000$, would resolve and characterize individual very massive stars that now can only be studied through the integrated light of their host clusters. It assembles three lines of evidence: resolved clusters (R136, NGC3603, NGC604) show VMS separations of 0.04 to 2 pc; unresolved clusters such as NGC3125-A1, MrK71-A, and IIZw40-N show integrated He II 1640 emission that only models including VMS reproduce; and the morphology of He II 1640, He II 4686, and the C IV 5801–12 doublet distinguishes VMS from ordinary Wolf–Rayet stars once the resolution reaches $R\sim2000$. At distances of 3 to 15 Mpc, 0.04–2 pc separations subtend 0.5–110 milliarcseconds, so a 5-mas UV diffraction limit opens the individual stars in the nearest and most favorable candidates to spectroscopy. The paper's stated outcome is a VMS census of hundreds across metallicities $0.1$–$1.5\,Z_\odot$ and an empirical answer to whether the boosted winds of very massive stars weaken with metallicity, as normal massive-star winds do, or stay strong, as the MrK71-A spectrum suggests.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the candidate clusters such as NGC3125-A1 and MrK71-A really contain very massive stars, and that those stars are spaced roughly a tenth of a light-year to several light-years apart, the way they are in the resolved clusters R136, NGC3603, and NGC604; if they are packed as tightly as the R136 a1-a3 trio, 5-milliarcsecond resolution would separate few or none of them and the proposed census gain would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The known VMS census grows from about twenty objects to tens or hundreds of individually characterized stars, with the largest gains in clusters at 3–15 Mpc such as NGC3125-A1, MrK71-A, IIZw40-N, M83, and the Antennae.
  • Mass-loss rates of very massive stars will be measured across metallicities from about $0.1$ to $1.5\,Z_\odot$ for the first time, directly testing whether the Eddington-boosted winds weaken with metallicity or stay strong.
  • Because the final state of a very massive star—pair-instability supernova versus direct collapse to a heavy black hole—depends on how much mass its wind removes, a metallicity-dependent mass-loss relation would change predicted nucleosynthetic yields, remnant masses, and the role of VMS in globular-cluster chemistry and early-galaxy spectra.
  • Resolved spectroscopy also captures the surrounding massive-star population, enabling a direct characterization of the upper initial mass function in starbursts instead of inferring it from integrated light.
  • The empirical candidate-selection route (strong He II 1640, weak N III relative to He II 4686, narrow C IV doublet) would be validated or revised against resolved spectra, producing templates that sharpen the interpretation of unresolved galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same 5-mas UV IFU would, almost for free, deliver resolved spectroscopy of the O-type and Wolf–Rayet populations around the VMS, giving the field the resolved template for massive-star populations that the paper notes is still missing; those data would sharpen the interpretation of integrated ultraviolet light from distant starbursts.
  • The paper's resolution table implies a sharp design preference: the ultraviolet diffraction limit is what carries the 11–15 Mpc targets, while a 15-mas optical-limited mode would rescue only the nearest clusters; if a future HWO trade-off sacrifices UV image sharpness, the boldest census claims in this case are the first to fade.
  • A testable extension of the selection strategy would be a pre-survey with existing ultraviolet spectrographs to confirm that every candidate cluster still satisfies the He II 1640 and C IV criteria at higher signal-to-noise before HWO time is committed; resolved spectra would then serve as a calibration of those criteria rather than just a confirmation of them.
  • If the separation assumption fails and the candidate clusters' very massive stars turn out to be packed as tightly as the R136 a1–a3 core, a smaller version of the science case survives in the nearest clusters, but the strongest claim—a census gain at 15 Mpc—would depend on clustering statistics that are currently unknown.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper makes the case that an integral-field spectrograph (IFU) on the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) operating at the diffraction limit (5 mas) with spectral resolution R~2000 in the UV-optical would enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of individual very massive stars (VMS) in young star clusters at distances of 3 to 15 Mpc. The authors motivate the science by the rarity and importance of VMS, summarize the current known sample of about twenty objects, and describe spectroscopic diagnostics (HeII 1640, NIV 1486, HeII 4686, CIV 5801-12) that can identify VMS. They estimate the required spatial resolution from resolved template clusters (R136, NGC3603, NGC604), propose a target list of unresolved clusters with suspected VMS, and give a table of observational requirements for different levels of progress. The central claim is that a 5 mas, R~2000 UV-optical IFU would 'revolutionize' VMS science.

Significance. If the proposed observations achieve the stated goals, they would provide a major advance in VMS studies: increasing the known sample from ~20 to potentially hundreds or more, enabling empirical constraints on the metallicity dependence of VMS mass loss, and providing resolved UV-optical spectroscopy to test stellar evolution and atmosphere models. The paper's strengths include its concrete, quantitative instrument requirements derived from template clusters and synthetic spectra, a specific target list spanning a range of metallicity, and an explicit statement of spectral diagnostics and required signal-to-noise. The paper also correctly identifies that ground-based ELTs cannot access the UV, making a space-based UV diffraction-limited IFU unique. These elements make the science case compelling if the underlying geometric assumptions about the candidate clusters are justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.1, Fig. 3, Table 1] The central claim that a 5 mas IFU enables a 'breakthrough' census of VMS out to 15 Mpc rests on the assumption that VMS separations in unresolved candidate clusters match the 0.04-2 pc range measured in R136, NGC3603, and NGC604. The integrated HeII 1640 selection criterion used to identify the candidates constrains only total flux, not the angular distribution of the emitting stars. At 5 mas, the resolvable projected separation is 0.085 pc at 3.5 Mpc and 0.36 pc at 15 Mpc; at the distance of NGC3125-A1 (15 Mpc), only the upper end of the assumed separation range (greater than about 0.36 pc) would be resolved. If the unresolved clusters contain compact sub-groups like R136a1-a3 (projected separations below 0.05 pc), a large fraction of their VMS would remain blended, and the '>500' entry in the 'Major Progress' column of Table 1 would not be realized. The manuscript itself acknowledges that some VMS are separated by less than the adopted typical distances, but it does not quantify the resulting loss in yield. Please provide a quantitative yield estimate as a function of assumed separation distribution, and/or an observational or theoretical justification for the adopted separations in the unresolved targets.
  2. [Section 4.2, Table 2] The proposed IFU requires 5 mas spatial sampling over a 1.5"x1.5" to 3"x3" field of view, which implies on the order of 10^5 spatial elements, each providing a full UV-optical spectrum at R~2000 over 1000-7000 Å. The manuscript does not discuss whether such an instrument is feasible within HWO's mass, volume, and data-rate constraints, nor does it compare with existing IFU concepts for the UV (e.g., image slicers, micro-lens arrays, or fiber-fed designs). Without a plausibility argument for the instrument, the claim that HWO can deliver this capability is incomplete. Please add a brief feasibility discussion or cite relevant instrument studies that make the proposed configuration credible.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4.1] The text says the unresolved clusters are shown in 'the bottom images of Fig. 6,' but the manuscript contains no Fig. 6; the intended reference is evidently the bottom panels of Fig. 3.
  2. [Section 4.2] The phrase 'spatially rtesolved spectroscopy' contains a typo; it should read 'spatially resolved spectroscopy.'
  3. [Table 1 and Table 2] The headers 'Substancial Progress' and 'Observarion Requirement' contain typos; they should be 'Substantial Progress' and 'Observation Requirement.'
  4. [Title] The title in the full text reads 'V ery Massive Stars with the Habitable Worlds Observatory' with an extra space; it should be 'Very Massive Stars with the Habitable Worlds Observatory.'
  5. [Section 3.2] The bullet list of targets includes NGC4038/4039 (The Antennae, 20 Mpc) and NGC3310 (17 Mpc), but Table 2 defines 'Major Progress' as applying to d < ~15 Mpc; the expected progress for these more distant targets is not stated.
  6. [References] The references for Keszthelyi et al. (2025) and Lefever et al. (2025) lack journal, volume, and page information; please update these if they have been accepted or published.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the proposed HWO observations would test the authors' prior diagnostics, not derive them from the target claim.

full rationale

This paper is a science case for a 5 mas diffraction-limited IFU on HWO, not a derivation of VMS properties from first principles. The authors use their own prior diagnostics (Martins et al. 2023; Martins & Palacios 2021, 2022) to pre-select candidate clusters and to illustrate spectral features, but the proposed spatially resolved UV-optical spectroscopy would directly test whether those diagnostics correctly identify VMS in unresolved clusters. The HeII 1640 equivalent-width criterion is an empirical calibrator based on R136, a cluster with individually known VMS, rather than a quantity derived from the proposed observations themselves. The spectral resolution requirement (R~2000) is set by the need to resolve line morphologies (e.g., the CIV 5801-12 doublet) in synthetic spectra, and this requirement is instrument design, not a posteriori prediction. The spatial resolution requirement is derived from measured separations in resolved templates and target distances; the paper explicitly flags the load-bearing assumption that unresolved clusters have comparable separations ('Assuming the separation between VMS in these unresolved clusters is the same as that in the resolved clusters'). That assumption is an unverified astrophysical extrapolation that could weaken the science case if wrong, but it is not a circular reduction of the conclusion to its premises. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is repackaged under new coordinates. Self-citations are used as tool-building inputs, not as the source of the claimed revolution, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the paper proposes an instrument configuration, not a new particle, force, or conserved quantity. The main free parameters are the assumed spatial distribution of VMS in unresolved clusters and the neglected extinction, both of which directly set the feasibility of the proposed observations.

free parameters (2)
  • Assumed VMS pairwise separation in unresolved clusters = 0.04 to 2 pc (from resolved templates)
    Section 4.1 assumes candidate clusters have the same VMS separations as R136, NGC3603, and NGC604 to derive the 5 mas requirement and the expected number of resolvable VMS. This is an empirical prior, not measured in the target clusters.
  • Extinction toward target clusters = 0 (neglected)
    Section 4.1 quotes target magnitudes 'without considering extinction'; dust attenuation in starbursts could push the faintest VMS below the assumed SNR in the stated few-minute exposures.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Very massive stars can be identified by the HeII 1640, NIV 1486, HeII 4686, and CIV 5801-12 features in integrated and individual spectra.
    Section 2.1 and Figure 1 adopt these diagnostics from Martins and Palacios (2021) and Martins et al. (2023); if those features are not exclusive to VMS, the pre-selection strategy would over- or under-select targets.
  • domain assumption A 6-meter-class telescope in space achieves the diffraction limit in the UV, about 5 mas at 1500 A.
    The entire resolution requirement analysis in Section 4.1 and Table 2 presumes HWO delivers diffraction-limited UV optics; degradation from wavefront errors or thermal effects would invalidate the angular resolution numbers.
  • domain assumption The Eddington-ratio dependence of VMS mass loss, with rates roughly ten times the extrapolation from normal massive stars, governs VMS evolution and appearance.
    Section 2.2 builds the metallicity science goal on this scaling; if VMS winds scale differently with metallicity, the proposed observations would still characterize the stars but the stated evolutionary consequences would differ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Very Massive Stars with the Habitable Worlds Observatory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KVBZ3GAP

@misc{pith2026250703371,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Very Massive Stars with the Habitable Worlds Observatory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KVBZ3GAP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03371}
}
read the original abstract

Very massive stars (VMS) are defined as stars with an initial mass in excess of 100 Msun. Because of their short lifetime and the shape of the stellar mass function, they are rare objects. Only about twenty of them are known in the Galaxy and the Large Magellanic Cloud. However VMS are important in several ways. They efficiently spread nucleosynthesis products through their boosted stellar winds, they are predicted to explode as pair-instability supernovae or to form heavy black-holes from direct collapse, and they outshine all other types of stars in the ultraviolet light, thus dominating the integrated light of starbursts. Their presence is indirectly suspected across all redshifts, all the way to cosmic dawn where they may have played a key role in the formation of the first galaxies. Their search and identification is currently hampered by instrumental limitation, especially spatial resolution. An integral field spectrograph working at the diffraction limit of HWO (5mas) and with a spectral resolution of about 2000 would revolutionize the understanding of VMS. We make the case for such an instrument in this contribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03371 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. — Theoretical UV spectrum of a VMS (top black line) compared to a normal massive star’s spectrum (bottom grey line). The VMS spectrum is dominated by a strong HeII 1640 emission. NIV 1486 emission is seen in VMS but not in normal O-type stars. Spectra are from Martins & Palacios (2021). The prime goal of the present science case is to iden￾tify and characterize VMS in such clusters that remain cur￾rently unresolved,… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. — Evolutionary tracks of VMS at a metallicity of 0.1 that of the Sun. The blue (cyan) lines correspond to models without (with) a metallicity scaling of mass loss rates. From Martins et al. (2025). winds is crucial, since pathways and final states of VMS strongly depend on their history of mass removal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. — The three top images show resolved clusters hosting VMS. The size bars indicate typical separation between the most massive components. The bottom panels show images of unre￾solved clusters likely hosting VMS. Numbers in red are the re￾quested spatial resolution needed to resolve individual VMS in those clusters, assuming their separation is similar to that in the resolved clusters. The second constraint is for sp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — Typical synthetic spectrum of a VMS in the UV range (top panel) and around HeII 4686 (bottom left) and CIV 5801-12 (bottom right). Different colors correspond to different spectral resolutions indicated in the top panel. The main lines specific to VMS are labelled in…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., & Hamann, W

    Barniske, A., Oskinova, L. M., & Hamann, W. R. 2008, A&A, 486, 971

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    A., Skillman, E

    Berg, D. A., Skillman, E. D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 87

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Bestenlehner, J. M. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3938

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    M., Vink, J

    Bestenlehner, J. M., Vink, J. S., Gr ¨afener, G., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, L14

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    M., Crowther, P

    Bestenlehner, J. M., Crowther, P. A., Caballero-Nieves, S. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1918 Bj¨orklund, R., Sundqvist, J. O., Puls, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A36

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    C., Lanz, T., Hillier, D

    Bouret, J. C., Lanz, T., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, 1182 —. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1545

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    C., Lanz, T., Martins, F., et al

    Bouret, J. C., Lanz, T., Martins, F., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A1

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    C., Martins, F., Hillier, D

    Bouret, J. C., Martins, F., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A134

    2021

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    A., de Koter, A., Bestenlehner, J

    Brands, S. A., de Koter, A., Bestenlehner, J. M., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A36

    2022

  2. [10]

    C., Miskey, C

    Bruhweiler, F. C., Miskey, C. L., & Smith Neubig, M. 2003, AJ, 125, 3082

    2003

  3. [11]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88

    2023

  4. [12]

    2023, A&A, 673, L7

    Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D., Prantzos, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L7

    2023

  5. [13]

    A., & Castro, N

    Crowther, P. A., & Castro, N. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9023

    2024

  6. [14]

    A., & Dessart, L

    Crowther, P. A., & Dessart, L. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 622

    1998

  7. [15]

    A., Dessart, L., Hillier, D

    Crowther, P. A., Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2002, A&A, 392, 653

    2002

  8. [16]

    A., Schnurr, O., Hirschi, R., et al

    Crowther, P. A., Schnurr, O., Hirschi, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 731

    2010

  9. [17]

    A., Caballero-Nieves, S

    Crowther, P. A., Caballero-Nieves, S. M., Bostroem, K. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 624 Della Bruna, L., Adamo, A., McLeod, A. F., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A29

    2016

  10. [18]

    F., Najarro, F., Morris, M., et al

    Figer, D. F., Najarro, F., Morris, M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 506, 384

    1998

  11. [19]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 64 G´omez-Gonz´alez, V

    Garcia, M., Herrero, A., Najarro, F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 64 G´omez-Gonz´alez, V . M. A., Mayya, Y . D., Toal´a, J. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2076 Gr¨afener, G. 2021, A&A, 647, A13 Gr¨afener, G., & Hamann, W. R. 2008, A&A, 482, 945

    2014

  12. [20]

    J., Crowther, P

    Hadfield, L. J., Crowther, P. A., Schild, H., et al. 2005, A&A, 439, 265

    2005

  13. [21]

    2015, A&A, 581, A21

    Hainich, R., Pasemann, D., Todt, H., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A21

    2015

  14. [22]

    R., Gr¨afener, G., & Liermann, A

    Hamann, W. R., Gr¨afener, G., & Liermann, A. 2006, A&A, 457, 1015

    2006

  15. [23]

    J., Lanz, T., Heap, S

    Hillier, D. J., Lanz, T., Heap, S. R., et al. 2003, ApJ, 588, 1039

    2003

  16. [24]

    L., Smartt, S

    Hunter, I., Dufton, P. L., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 277

    2007

  17. [25]

    J., et al

    Hunter, I., Brott, I., Lennon, D. J., et al. 2008, ApJL, 676, L29

    2008

  18. [26]

    A., de Koter, A., et al

    Keszthelyi, Z., Brands, S. A., de Koter, A., et al. 2025 K¨ohler, K., Langer, N., de Koter, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A71

    2025

  19. [27]

    A., Audard, M., et al

    Lanz, T., Telis, G. A., Audard, M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 517

    2005

  20. [28]

    R., Sander, A

    Lefever, R. R., Sander, A. A. C., Bernini-Peron, M., et al. 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    C., et al

    Leitherer, C., Byler, N., Lee, J. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 865, 55

    2018

  22. [30]

    1992, ApJ, 401, 596

    Leitherer, C., Robert, C., & Drissen, L. 1992, ApJ, 401, 596

    1992

  23. [31]

    Marcolino, W. L. F., Bouret, J. C., Rocha-Pinto, H. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 5104

    2022

  24. [32]

    2024, A&A, 681, A30

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Kuruvanthodi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A30

    2024

  25. [33]

    2023, A&A, 679, A137

    Martinet, S., Meynet, G., Ekstr ¨om, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A137

    2023

  26. [34]

    2013, A&A, 554, A23

    Martins, F., Depagne, E., Russeil, D., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A23

    2013

  27. [35]

    J., Paumard, T., et al

    Martins, F., Hillier, D. J., Paumard, T., et al. 2008, A&A, 478, 219

    2008

  28. [36]

    2021, A&A, 645, A67 —

    Martins, F., & Palacios, A. 2021, A&A, 645, A67 —. 2022, A&A, 659, A163

    2021

  29. [37]

    Martins, F., Palacios, A., Schaerer, D., et al. 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    J., et al

    Martins, F., Schaerer, D., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2004, A&A, 420, 1087 —. 2005, A&A, 441, 735

    2004

  31. [39]

    2023, A&A, 678, A159

    Martins, F., Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A159

    2023

  32. [40]

    C., et al

    Martins, F., Herv´e, A., Bouret, J. C., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A34

    2015

  33. [41]

    C., Hillier, D

    Martins, F., Bouret, J. C., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A31

    2024

  34. [42]

    P., et al

    Massey, P., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R. P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 608, 1001

    2004

  35. [43]

    R., de Koter, A., Vink, J

    Mokiem, M. R., de Koter, A., Vink, J. S., et al. 2007, A&A, 473, 603

    2007

  36. [44]

    P., Oesch, P

    Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., et al. 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    R., Oskinova, L

    Ramachandran, V ., Hamann, W. R., Oskinova, L. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A104 Rivero Gonz ´alez, J. G., Puls, J., Najarro, F., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A79

    2019

  38. [46]

    N., Vink, J

    Sabhahit, G. N., Vink, J. S., Higgins, E. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3736

    2022

  39. [47]

    Sander, A. A. C., Vink, J. S., & Hamann, W. R. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4406

    2020

  40. [48]

    2025, A&A, 693, A271 Sch¨osser, E

    Schaerer, D., Guibert, J., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A271 Sch¨osser, E. C., Ramachandran, V ., Sander, A. A. C., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, L3

    2025

  41. [49]

    P., et al

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 92

    2024

  42. [50]

    P., Charlot, S., et al

    Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Charlot, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 6112

    2021

  43. [51]

    P., Chevallard, J., et al

    Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Chevallard, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3492

    2019

  44. [52]

    J., Crowther, P

    Smith, L. J., Crowther, P. A., Calzetti, D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 38

    2016

  45. [53]

    J., Oey, M

    Smith, L. J., Oey, M. S., Hernandez, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 194

    2023

  46. [54]

    P., Topping, M

    Stark, D. P., Topping, M. W., Endsley, R., et al. 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    2024, A&A, 686, A185

    Upadhyaya, A., Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A185

    2024

  48. [56]

    Vink, J. S. 2023, A&A, 679, L9

    2023

  49. [57]

    S., Muijres, L

    Vink, J. S., Muijres, L. E., Anthonisse, B., et al. 2011, A&A, 531, A132

    2011

  50. [58]

    S., Heger, A., Krumholz, M

    Vink, J. S., Heger, A., Krumholz, M. R., et al. 2015, Highlights of Astronomy, 16, 51

    2015

  51. [59]

    C., Chandar, R., Schweizer, F., et al

    Whitmore, B. C., Chandar, R., Schweizer, F., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, Very Massive Stars with HWO 9 Table 2: Observation requirements to spectroscopically resolve individual VMS in different environments Observarion Requirement State of the Art Incremental Progress Substancial Pr...

    2010

  52. [60]

    2014, ApJ, 781, 122

    Wofford, A., Leitherer, C., Chandar, R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 122

    2014

  53. [61]

    2021, MNRAS, 500, 2908

    Wofford, A., Vidal-Garc´ıa, A., Feltre, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2908

    2021

  54. [62]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 3949

    Wofford, A., Sixtos, A., Charlot, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3949

    2023

  55. [63]

    2013, MNRAS, 433, 1114

    Yusof, N., Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1114

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.