Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

JWST Spectra of Brown Dwarf Candidates in the Orion Nebula Cluster

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read JWST spectra of 200 ONC sources reveal that all seven observed JuMBO components are background sources, not brown dwarfs.

desk verdict New NIRSpec spectra make the JuMBO case harder to defend, but the decisive seven spectra were not optimally reduced and need a closer look. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03679 v1 pith:FNMXZ5EJ submitted 2025-07-04 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.EP

K. L. Luhman This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.EP
keywords JWSTNIRSpecOrionNebulaClusterbrowndwarfsJuMBOspectralclassificationmembershipbackgroundsources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes archival JWST/NIRSpec spectra of 200 sources toward the Orion Nebula Cluster to test whether faint point sources discovered in NIRCam images are true low-mass cluster members. The author classifies 53 sources as likely cluster members, 24 with spectral types >M6 that are suggestive of brown dwarfs at the cluster age. The paper's central claim is that seven observed components of the previously reported 'Jupiter-mass binary objects' (JuMBOs) are not brown dwarfs at all: they show none of the molecular absorption bands expected for young cool objects and are classified as background sources. If correct, this removes the strongest spectroscopic support for the existence of wide Jupiter-mass binaries in the ONC and matches the author's prior photometric conclusion that only a few JuMBO components could be substellar.

What carries the argument

The classification rests on spectral diagnostics of youth for late-type objects. Young objects show a triangular H-band continuum shape and weak CO absorption at 4.4–5.2 μm, while older field dwarfs have flat-topped H-band continua and strong CO; these diagnostics are applied together with the presence of water bands at shorter wavelengths, disk accretion indicators, and X-ray data. Spectral types are assigned to members by comparing NIRSpec spectra to young standard spectra from Luhman et al. (2017), and the seven JuMBO components are classified as background because they lack the strong molecular absorption bands seen in the young brown dwarfs, showing instead the 3 μm water-ice feature associated with reddened cloud background stars.

What would settle it

Re-extract the spectra of the seven JuMBO targets from the publicly archived NIRSpec data using optimized per-nod background subtraction; if any spectrum shows water absorption bands at 1.4 or 1.9 μm or a triangular H-band continuum, the background-source classification would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that single-component NIRSpec spectra of seven JuMBO pairs from Pearson & McCaughrean (2023) all lack the strong H2O and other molecular bands at wavelengths shortward of 2.5 μm that are characteristic of young brown dwarfs, and instead show a broad absorption feature near 3 μm from water ice in the molecular cloud, which is typical of reddened background sources. On that basis, all seven objects are classified as background stars rather than cluster members. The author further reports that among the 200 targets, 53 are likely members, 24 of which have spectral types >M6 and are therefore candidate brown dwarfs at the 1–5 Myr age of the cluster. These spectral classifications are presented as consistent with the prior photometric analysis of Luhman (2024), which found that only a few JuMBO components have brown-dwarf-like colors and that none form uniquely wide or low-mass pairs relative to known binary brown dwarfs.

Load-bearing premise

The background classification of the seven JuMBO components assumes that their initial, not fully optimized, background subtraction did not erase the broad molecular bands that would mark them as young brown dwarfs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The seven observed JuMBO components are removed from the census of substellar cluster members, leaving the JuMBO population without its strongest spectroscopic confirmation.
  • The photometric selection method of Luhman (2024) is supported: most background sources fall above the defined color boundaries, while almost all >M6 members fall below them.
  • The 24 members with spectral types >M6 constitute a sample of low-mass (likely substellar) members of the ONC that can be used to probe the low-mass end of the cluster's initial mass function.
  • Formation scenarios proposed for wide, Jupiter-mass binaries are left without an observational anchor in the ONC, because the objects that motivated them appear to be field contaminants.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the background classification holds, the apparent population of wide low-mass binaries in the ONC may be almost entirely a projection effect of reddened background sources, so the challenge these objects posed to binary formation models disappears.
  • The paper's own caution about unoptimized reductions for non-members suggests a targeted re-reduction of the seven archived spectra is the fastest independent check of the central result.
  • The 13 objects with uncertain membership, including two late-type low-SNR sources, are natural targets for deeper spectroscopy; confirming or rejecting those would refine the low-mass census.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes archival JWST/NIRSpec MSA/PRISM spectra of 200 sources toward the Orion Nebula Cluster. The author classifies 53 sources as likely members, of which 24 have spectral types >M6 and are thus plausible brown dwarfs at the cluster age. Seven objects previously identified as components of Jupiter-mass binary objects (JuMBOs) by Pearson & McCaughrean (2023) are classified as background sources on the basis of the absence of strong molecular absorption bands at <2.5 um. The spectral classifications are used to test the author's earlier photometric analysis (Luhman 2024), and the JuMBO result is presented as supporting that prior conclusion. Reduced spectra are made publicly available.

Significance. If correct, the paper removes the strongest spectroscopic evidence that the JuMBOs are young, low-mass substellar binaries in the ONC, and instead supports the view that most JuMBO components are reddened background sources. The paper also provides a valuable spectroscopic census of low-mass ONC members and background contaminants, including the identification of 24 candidate brown dwarfs and a possible Class 0 protostar. The analysis uses standard youth diagnostics (triangular H-band shape, weak CO, disk/proplyd/X-ray indicators) and makes the reduced spectra publicly available. The NIRSpec data are genuinely independent of the photometric boundaries being tested, which is a strength. The main fragility is the reliance on a null detection for the JuMBO conclusion, combined with an acknowledged lack of optimized background subtraction for these targets.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Section 3, Figure 1] The classification of all seven JuMBO components as background sources rests on the initial reduction, for which the author explicitly states 'I did not attempt to identify the optimal reduction for the targets classified as background sources based on the initial reduction.' In the ONC, nebular emission is spatially variable, and the default procedure of subtracting the average of the other two nods can leave a wavelength-dependent continuum residual. Such a residual could in principle dilute or fill the broad H2O bands at 1.4 and 1.9 um that are the primary diagnostic used in Figure 1. Because this is the paper's headline claim, the author should either (a) re-reduce the seven JuMBO spectra with the same optimized background-subtraction procedure used for candidate members and confirm that the molecular bands remain absent, or (b) explicitly present the JuMBO conclusion as provisional pending a more careful reduction. As written, the abstract asserts the result as definitive, which is not supported by the reduction choices described in Section 2.
  2. [Section 3, Figure 1] The claim that the seven JuMBO spectra lack molecular absorption bands is a null detection, but the paper provides no quantitative sensitivity estimate. The author does not state the signal-to-noise ratio in the 1.4-1.9 um region for these faint targets, nor the maximum H2O band strength that could be present yet undetected. A comparison of the JuMBO spectra to reddened young standards with simulated noise, or an upper limit on the equivalent width of the H2O bands, would materially strengthen the conclusion that a cool young object cannot be hidden in these data. As it stands, a reader cannot distinguish 'no bands' from 'bands too weak or too noisy to detect.'
  3. [Section 3] The youth diagnostics (triangular H-band shape, weak CO strength) are described qualitatively but not quantified. For the 53 sources classified as members and the 24 candidate brown dwarfs, it would be helpful to state whether classifications were assigned by eye or using quantitative indices, and to provide representative uncertainties in spectral type and reddening. This is a secondary concern relative to the JuMBO classification, but it would improve the reproducibility of the membership analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2] The sentence describing the nod pattern reads 'three nod positions that moved targets between three adjacent shutters. which were equivalent to 0.2" x 1.5" slitlets.' The period after 'shutters' should be a comma, and the phrase 'which were' is ambiguous; the intended meaning is that the three shutters together formed the slit.
  2. [Section 3] There is a typographical artifact in the text: 'T wo spectra exhibit tentative detections' and 'T he data for sources' appear with a stray space. These should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3, Figure 1] The caption of Figure 1 notes that sources 10SE and 11NW were binned to lower resolution, but it does not state the binning factor or the resulting resolution. Adding this information would aid the reader's interpretation of the plotted spectra.
  4. [References] The references to McCaughrean & Pearson (2023) and Pearson & McCaughrean (2023) are given as arXiv e-prints. If either has been accepted or published in a journal by the time of this submission, the published reference should be used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the NIRSpec spectral classifications are independent data that test, rather than fit, the photometric boundaries.

full rationale

The central claim, that seven JuMBO components are background sources rather than brown dwarfs, rests on the observed absence of strong molecular absorption bands (H2O, CO) and on the H-band continuum shape in NIRSpec spectra. These classifications are made directly from the spectra and are not derived from, or fitted to, the photometric colors or magnitude boundaries used to select JuMBO candidates. Section 4 then compares the independently measured spectral types to the prior photometric selection boundaries, which is a genuine consistency test rather than a circular reduction. Citations to the author's earlier works (Luhman et al. 2017, 2023, 2024) supply empirical spectral standards and youth diagnostics; these are external calibrations from other datasets and do not incorporate the present target classifications or the JuMBO claim. The manuscript's explicit caveat that background-subtracted spectra for targets classified as background sources were not optimized is a data-quality limitation that could affect the reliability of weak features, but it does not make the conclusion equivalent to the input assumptions. No parameter is fitted from the JuMBO photometry and then renamed as a spectroscopic prediction, and no self-citation chain is invoked to force the joint-mass conclusion. The derivation is therefore self-contained in the relevant sense.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters; spectral types and extinctions are measurements by comparison to reddened standards. It relies on established empirical calibrations: the youth diagnostics of Lucas et al. (2001) and Luhman et al. (2023), the Schlafly et al. (2016) extinction law, the evolutionary model mass mapping of Baraffe et al. (2015) and Chabrier et al. (2023), and the adopted cluster age and distance. The proposed 'H' spectral class is carried over from prior work (Luhman & Alves de Oliveira 2025), not newly introduced, and no new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Young late-type objects show triangular H-band continua and weak CO bands, while older field dwarfs show flat-topped H-band and strong CO absorption
    Section 3 uses this empirical calibration (Lucas et al. 2001; Luhman et al. 2023) as the primary age and membership diagnostic; all 200 classifications depend on it.
  • domain assumption The Schlafly et al. (2016) extinction law applies along the ONC sightline
    Section 3 reddens standard spectra to match ONC targets at 1.2 to 1.7 microns with this law; spectral types and A_K are derived jointly under this assumption.
  • domain assumption Baraffe et al. (2015) and Chabrier et al. (2023) evolutionary models map spectral type to mass at the ONC age
    Section 4 converts M5.5 and M8 types to roughly 0.1 and 0.04 solar masses, arguing against the 0.011 to 0.012 solar mass JuMBO mass estimates.
  • domain assumption The ONC is about 1 to 5 Myr old at a distance of 390 +/- 2 pc
    The introduction adopts these values (Jeffries et al. 2011; Maiz Apellaniz et al. 2022); spectral-type-to-mass conversions and the >M6 brown dwarf threshold are age-dependent.
  • domain assumption The JWST calibration pipeline (v1.17.12) and nod-pair background subtraction preserve the spectral features needed for classification
    Section 2 reduction relies on pipeline outputs; imperfect background subtraction is acknowledged and partly remediated with alternative nod pairs for member-like sources, but not for background-classified sources.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST Spectra of Brown Dwarf Candidates in the Orion Nebula Cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNMXZ5EJ

@misc{pith2026250703679,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST Spectra of Brown Dwarf Candidates in the Orion Nebula Cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNMXZ5EJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03679}
}
abstract

I present an analysis of archival spectra of 200 sources toward the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC) that were obtained with the Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on board the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). I have used these data to assess cluster membership and measure spectral types for the targets. Fifty-three sources are classified as likely cluster members, 24 of which have spectral types that are suggestive of brown dwarfs ($>$M6). Seven of the NIRSpec targets were previously identified as "Jupiter-mass binary objects" (JuMBOs), all of which are background sources rather than brown dwarfs based on the NIRSpec data. The spectral classifications of those objects are consistent with the results of my recent study of the JWST photometry in the ONC, which found that only a few JuMBO components have the colors expected for brown dwarfs, none of which form pairs that have uniquely wide separations or low masses relative to known binary brown dwarfs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03679 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. JWST/NIRSpec spectra of an example of an ONC brown dwarf (source 784 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of JWST/NIRSpec spectra of sources classified as members of the ONC. They are labeled with the source numbers from the APT catalog for these observations ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Color-color and color-magnitude diagrams for JWST/NIRSpec targets toward the ONC, which have been classified as members of the ONC (large filled and open circles), background sources (small points), or objects with uncertain membership (crosses; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R., Robberto M., Bergeron L

    Andersen M., Meyer M. R., Robberto M., Bergeron L. E., Reid N., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...534A..10A 534, A10

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117062 2011

  2. [2]

    Baraffe I., Homeier D., Allard F., Chabrier G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..42B 577, A42

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 2015

  3. [3]

    J., Reid I

    Burgasser A. J., Reid I. N., Siegler N., Close L., Allen P., Lowrance P., Gizis J., 2007, in Reipurth B., Jewitt D., Keil K., eds, Protostars and Planets V. p. 427 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0602122 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0602122

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0602122 2007

  4. [4]

    Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Phillips M., Debras F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.119C 671, A119

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243832 2023

  5. [5]

    M., Dumas C., Zuckerman B., Mouillet D., Song I., Beuzit J

    Chauvin G., Lagrange A. M., Dumas C., Zuckerman B., Mouillet D., Song I., Beuzit J. L., Lowrance P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200400056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...425L..29C 425, L29

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200400056 2004

  6. [6]

    Coleman G. A. L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae903 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530..630C 530, 630

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae903 2024

  7. [7]

    A., Henning T., Stassun K

    Da Rio N., Robberto M., Hillenbrand L. A., Henning T., Stassun K. G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...14D 748, 14

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/14 2012

  8. [8]

    A., Ysard N., Demyk K., Chabot M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.153D 666, A153

    Dartois E., Noble J. A., Ysard N., Demyk K., Chabot M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.153D 666, A153

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243929 2022

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    L., Parker R

    Diamond J. L., Parker R. J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8644 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..204D 975, 204

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Drass H., Haas M., Chini R., Bayo A., Hackstein M., Hoffmeister V., Godoy N., Vogt N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.1734D 461, 1734

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2fa0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966...41F 966, 41

    Federman S. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2fa0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966...41F 966, 41

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Ferruit P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142673 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A..81F 661, A81

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135f8001G 135, 068001

    Gardner J. P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135f8001G 135, 068001

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Gennaro M., Robberto M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab911a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896...80G 896, 80

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    V., Feigelson E

    Getman K. V., Feigelson E. D., Grosso N., McCaughrean M. J., Micela G., Broos P., Garmire G., Townsley L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJS..160..353G 160, 353

    2005 doi

  8. [16]

    V., Feigelson E

    Getman K. V., Feigelson E. D., Garmire G. P., Broos P. S., Kuhn M. A., Preibisch T., Airapetian V. S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935...43G 935, 43

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113.1733H 113, 1733

    Hillenbrand L. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113.1733H 113, 1733

    1997 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Carpenter J

    Hillenbrand L. A., Carpenter J. M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309309 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...540..236H 540, 236

    2000 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Hoffer A

    Hillenbrand L. A., Hoffer A. S., Herczeg G. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/85 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....146...85H 146, 85

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    Huang Y., Zhu W., Kokubo E., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8925 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975L..38H 975, L38

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Ingraham P., Albert L., Doyon R., Artigau E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782....8I 782, 8

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    Jakobsen P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A..80J 661, A80

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    D., Littlefair S

    Jeffries R. D., Littlefair S. P., Naylor T., Mayne N. J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19613.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418.1948J 418, 1948

    2011

  16. [24]

    Lazzoni C., Rice K., Zurlo A., Hinkley S., Desidera S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3443 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.3837L 527, 3837

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    W., Roche P

    Lucas P. W., Roche P. F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03515.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.314..858L 314, 858

    2000

  18. [26]

    W., Roche P

    Lucas P. W., Roche P. F., Allard F., Hauschildt P. H., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04666.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.326..695L 326, 695

    2001

  19. [27]

    W., Roche P

    Lucas P. W., Roche P. F., Tamura M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09156.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.361..211L 361, 211

    2005

  20. [28]

    W., Weights D

    Lucas P. W., Weights D. J., Roche P. F., Riddick F. C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00244.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.373L..60L 373, L60

    2006

  21. [29]

    L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad812a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..230L 168, 230

    Luhman K. L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad812a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..230L 168, 230

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    L., Alves de Oliveira C., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/addc55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...986L..14L 986, L14

    Luhman K. L., Alves de Oliveira C., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/addc55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...986L..14L 986, L14

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    L., Rieke G

    Luhman K. L., Rieke G. H., Young E. T., Cotera A. S., Chen H., Rieke M. J., Schneider G., Thompson R. I., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...540.1016L 540, 1016

    2000 doi

  24. [32]

    L., Mamajek E

    Luhman K. L., Mamajek E. E., Shukla S. J., Loutrel N. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/46 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...46L 153, 46

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acd635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...949L..36L 949, L36

    Luhman K. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acd635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...949L..36L 949, L36

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    L., Alves de Oliveira C., Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Geballe T

    Luhman K. L., Alves de Oliveira C., Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Geballe T. R., Parker R. J., Pendleton Y. J., Tremblin P., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad00b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167...19L 167, 19

    doi

  27. [35]

    L., Alves de Oliveira C., Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Manjavacas E., Parker R

    Luhman K. L., Alves de Oliveira C., Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Manjavacas E., Parker R. J., Tremblin P., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..162L 975, 162

    doi

  28. [36]

    H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Crespo Bellido P., Sota A., Alfaro E

    Ma \' z Apell \'a niz J., Barb \'a R. H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Crespo Bellido P., Sota A., Alfaro E. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A.131M 657, A131

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    J., Pearson S

    McCaughrean M. J., Pearson S. G., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.03552 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231003552M p. arXiv:2310.03552

    2023 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    J., Stauffer J

    McCaughrean M. J., Stauffer J. R., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....108.1382M 108, 1382

    1994 doi

  31. [39]

    Meingast S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...587A.153M 587, A153

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    A., Lada E

    Muench A. A., Lada E. A., Lada C. J., Alves J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...573..366M 573, 366

    2002 doi

  33. [41]

    4, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I

    Muench A., Getman K., Hillenbrand L., Preibisch T., 2008, in Reipurth B., ed., , Vol. 4, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I. p. 483, @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0812.1323

    2008 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    R., Muench A., Smith N., Zapata L., 2008, in Reipurth B., ed., , Vol

    O'Dell C. R., Muench A., Smith N., Zapata L., 2008, in Reipurth B., ed., , Vol. 4, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I. p. 544

    2008

  35. [43]

    J., Goodwin S

    Parker R. J., Goodwin S. P., Diamond J. L., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf045 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540L.104P 540, L104

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    G., McCaughrean M

    Pearson S. G., McCaughrean M. J., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.01231 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231001231P p. arXiv:2310.01231

    2023 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2136R 136, 2136

    Ricci L., Robberto M., Soderblom D. R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2136R 136, 2136

    2008 doi

  38. [46]

    C., Roche P

    Riddick F. C., Roche P. F., Lucas P. W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12308.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1077R 381, 1077

    2007

  39. [47]

    J., Kelly D., Horner S., 2005, in Heaney J

    Rieke M. J., Kelly D., Horner S., 2005, in Heaney J. B., Burriesci L. G., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 5904, Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI. pp 1--8, @doi 10.1117/12.615554

    2005 doi

  40. [48]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135b8001R 135, 028001

    Rieke M. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135b8001R 135, 028001

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    R., Scandariato G., Smith K., Da Rio N., Pagano I., Spezzi L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139..950R 139, 950

    Robberto M., Soderblom D. R., Scandariato G., Smith K., Da Rio N., Pagano I., Spezzi L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139..950R 139, 950

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    Robberto M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab911e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896...79R 896, 79

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...78S 821, 78

    Schlafly E. F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...78S 821, 78

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Beck T

    Simon M., Close L. M., Beck T. L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300767 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999AJ....117.1375S 117, 1375

    1999 doi

  45. [53]

    L., Hillenbrand L

    Slesnick C. L., Hillenbrand L. A., Carpenter J. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421898 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...610.1045S 610, 1045

    2004 doi

  46. [54]

    O., Luhman K

    Todorov K. O., Luhman K. L., Konopacky Q. M., McLeod K. K., Apai D., Ghez A. M., Pascucci I., Robberto M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...40T 788, 40

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    Wang Y., Perna R., Zhu Z., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02239-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8..756W 8, 756

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    Wang Y., Perna R., Zhu Z., Lin D. N. C., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adb8e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...982...90W 982, 90

    2025 doi

  49. [57]

    J., Lucas P

    Weights D. J., Lucas P. W., Roche P. F., Pinfield D. J., Riddick F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14096.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.392..817W 392, 817

    2009

  50. [58]

    Yu F., Lai D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970...97Y 970, 97

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    F., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250508002V p

    van Dishoeck E. F., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250508002V p. arXiv:2505.08002

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.