pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.03828 · v4 · submitted 2025-07-04 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

IMPACT: Importance-Aware Activation Space Reconstruction

Md Mokarram Chowdhury , Daniel Agyei Asante , Ernie Chang , Yang Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords LLM compressionactivation reconstructionlow-rank approximationimportance weightinggradient importancemodel efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

IMPACT reconstructs LLM activations using a gradient-weighted covariance matrix to achieve low-rank compression that better preserves accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that LLM activations show a clearer low-rank structure than weights, so compression should target activation reconstruction error instead of weight error. It further claims that activation dimensions are not equal in their effect on performance, so uniform treatment wastes potential accuracy. IMPACT turns this into an optimization that folds in gradient-derived importance scores and solves for the best low-rank bases in closed form via a weighted covariance matrix. If correct, this produces compression that directly protects task accuracy rather than just minimizing reconstruction error.

Core claim

IMPACT formulates compression as an optimization problem that integrates activation structure with gradient-based importance, deriving a closed-form solution where reconstruction bases arise from an importance-weighted activation covariance matrix. This yields low-rank compression explicitly optimized for accuracy preservation.

What carries the argument

importance-weighted activation covariance matrix, from which the optimal low-rank reconstruction bases are computed in closed form

If this is right

  • Up to 55.4 percent greater size reduction is possible while accuracy stays comparable to or better than baselines.
  • The closed-form solution removes the need for iterative solvers during compression.
  • Compression decisions are tied directly to measured effects on model outputs via the importance weights.
  • The approach works across multiple models and tasks in the reported experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same weighting idea could be tried inside quantization or pruning pipelines to improve their accuracy-size trade-offs.
  • Calibration set design becomes critical; using only a narrow slice of data might lock in importance scores that miss rare but high-impact patterns.
  • The method might transfer to other sequence models where activation statistics are similarly low-rank but importance varies.
  • Testing whether the derived bases remain stable when the model is later fine-tuned would check long-term usefulness.

Load-bearing premise

Gradient importance scores computed on a calibration set continue to reflect each activation dimension's true contribution to performance on all future inputs and tasks.

What would settle it

Running the compressed models on held-out tasks or data distributions far from the calibration set and finding larger accuracy drops than standard low-rank baselines would show the importance weighting does not generalize.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03828 by Daniel Agyei Asante, Ernie Chang, Md Mokarram Chowdhury, Yang Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Normalized average gradient magnitudes across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pass@1 accuracy and model size of Llama 2-7B compressed with various low-rank algorithms on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pass@1 accuracy and model size of Llama 2-13B compressed with various low-rank algorithms on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pass@1 accuracy and model size of CodeLlama-7B compressed with various low-rank algorithms on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pass@1 accuracy and model size of CodeLlama-13B compressed with various low-rank algorithms on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pass@1 accuracy and model size of Llama 2-7B models compressed using quantization alone, as well as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Throughput and memory consumption of com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pass@1 accuracy and model size of Llama 2-13B models compressed using quantization alone, as well as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across diverse domains but remain difficult to deploy in resource-constrained environments due to their size. Low-rank compression is a common remedy, typically minimizing weight reconstruction error under the assumption that weights are low-rank. However, this assumption often does not hold in LLMs. In contrast, LLM activations exhibit a more pronounced low-rank structure, motivating approaches that minimize activation reconstruction error. This shift alone, however, is not sufficient: different activation dimensions contribute unequally to model performance, and treating them uniformly can lead to accuracy loss. We introduce IMPACT, an importance-aware activation reconstruction framework that links compression to its effect on model performance. IMPACT formulates compression as an optimization problem that integrates activation structure with gradient-based importance, deriving a closed-form solution where reconstruction bases arise from an importance-weighted activation covariance matrix. This yields low-rank compression explicitly optimized for accuracy preservation. Experiments across multiple models and tasks demonstrate that IMPACT achieves up to 55.4% greater model size reduction while maintaining accuracy comparable to or better than state-of-the-art baselines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces IMPACT, a framework for low-rank compression of large language models via importance-aware activation space reconstruction. It formulates compression as an optimization problem that combines activation structure with gradient-based importance scores, deriving a closed-form solution in which the reconstruction bases are obtained from an importance-weighted activation covariance matrix. This is claimed to yield compression explicitly optimized for accuracy preservation. Experiments across multiple models and tasks report up to 55.4% greater model size reduction while maintaining accuracy comparable to or better than state-of-the-art baselines.

Significance. If the closed-form derivation is correct and the gradient-based importance weights generalize reliably beyond the calibration set, the approach would represent a meaningful advance over uniform activation or weight reconstruction methods by directly linking compression to downstream performance. The explicit optimization for accuracy preservation and the reported empirical gains in compression ratio could have practical value for efficient LLM deployment. The strength lies in the attempt to move beyond heuristic low-rank assumptions toward a performance-aware objective.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental evaluation and importance score computation] The central claim that the importance-weighted covariance produces bases that explicitly preserve accuracy rests on the assumption that gradient-based importance scores computed on a calibration set reliably proxy each activation dimension's contribution to final task performance. The manuscript provides no details on calibration set size, diversity, or validation against distribution shift (e.g., in the experimental section or ablation studies), leaving open the possibility that the scores are brittle and the derived solution optimizes a mis-specified objective.
  2. [Formulation and closed-form derivation] The derivation of the closed-form solution (integrating activation covariance with gradient importance) must be shown to avoid circularity, since the importance weights themselves derive from model gradients. Without explicit steps demonstrating that the weighting is independent of the evaluation data used for final accuracy reporting, the optimization risks reducing to self-referential fitting rather than an independent prediction of accuracy preservation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method] Clarify the precise definition of the importance weighting function and how it is normalized before incorporation into the covariance matrix.
  2. [Experiments] Include ablation studies isolating the contribution of the importance weighting versus standard activation reconstruction error minimization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental evaluation and importance score computation] The central claim that the importance-weighted covariance produces bases that explicitly preserve accuracy rests on the assumption that gradient-based importance scores computed on a calibration set reliably proxy each activation dimension's contribution to final task performance. The manuscript provides no details on calibration set size, diversity, or validation against distribution shift (e.g., in the experimental section or ablation studies), leaving open the possibility that the scores are brittle and the derived solution optimizes a mis-specified objective.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit documentation of the calibration procedure. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph in the experimental section specifying the calibration set size, its task and domain composition, and new ablation results that evaluate importance-score stability under distribution shifts between calibration and test data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Formulation and closed-form derivation] The derivation of the closed-form solution (integrating activation covariance with gradient importance) must be shown to avoid circularity, since the importance weights themselves derive from model gradients. Without explicit steps demonstrating that the weighting is independent of the evaluation data used for final accuracy reporting, the optimization risks reducing to self-referential fitting rather than an independent prediction of accuracy preservation.

    Authors: The importance weights are obtained from gradients on a calibration set that is disjoint from all evaluation sets used for final accuracy reporting. The closed-form derivation in Section 3 operates solely on this calibration-derived weighted covariance. We will expand the derivation subsection with an explicit enumeration of the data-flow steps, clearly separating the calibration phase from the held-out evaluation phase, to remove any ambiguity regarding independence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper formulates compression as an explicit optimization problem that incorporates activation covariance structure together with separately computed gradient-based importance weights, then derives the closed-form reconstruction bases as the principal components of the resulting importance-weighted matrix. This is a direct algebraic solution to the stated objective rather than a reduction of the claimed result to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional loop, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation is present in the abstract or described method. The importance scores function as an independent input derived from gradients on a calibration set, and the accuracy-preservation claim rests on the optimization itself rather than tautological equivalence. The derivation remains self-contained with independent mathematical content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the low-rank structure of activations and the validity of gradient-derived importance as a proxy for performance contribution. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract, but the importance computation implicitly depends on calibration data choice.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption LLM activations exhibit a more pronounced low-rank structure than weights.
    Stated directly in the abstract as motivation for shifting from weight to activation reconstruction.
  • domain assumption Gradient-based importance scores reliably indicate each activation dimension's contribution to model performance.
    Used to weight the covariance matrix; this is the load-bearing link between compression and accuracy preservation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1378 out tokens · 46495 ms · 2026-05-19T05:28:10.431855+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Online Embedding Compression for Text Classification Using Low Rank Matrix Factorization

    Anish Acharya, Rahul Goel, Angeliki Metallinou, and Inderjit Dhillon. Online Embedding Compression for Text Classification Using Low Rank Matrix Factorization . In Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artifi...

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Fluctuation-based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models

    Yongqi An, Xu Zhao, Tao Yu, Ming Tang, and Jinqiao Wang. Fluctuation-based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models . In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Program Synthesis with Large Language Models

    Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, and Charles Sutton. Program Synthesis with Large Language Models . arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07732, 2021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

    Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code . arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021 a

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    GroupReduce: Block-Wise Low-Rank Approximation for Neural Language Model Shrinking

    Patrick Chen, Si Si, Yang Li, Ciprian Chelba, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. GroupReduce: Block-Wise Low-Rank Approximation for Neural Language Model Shrinking . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    DRONE: Data-Aware Low-Rank Compression for Large NLP Models

    Patrick Chen, Hsiang-Fu Yu, Inderjit Dhillon, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. DRONE: Data-Aware Low-Rank Compression for Large NLP Models . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021 b

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

    Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems . arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168, 2021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Exploiting linear structure within convolutional networks for efficient evaluation

    Emily Denton, Wojciech Zaremba, Joan Bruna, Yann LeCun, and Rob Fergus. Exploiting linear structure within convolutional networks for efficient evaluation . In International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs

    Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs . In Advances in neural information processing systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Golub and Charles F

    Gene H. Golub and Charles F. Van Loan. Matrix Computations . Johns Hopkins University Press , 1983. ISBN 978-0-8018-3010-9

    work page 1983

  11. [11]

    Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving with the MATH Dataset

    Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, Steven Basart, Eric Tang, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving with the MATH Dataset . In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Language Model Compression with Weighted Low-Rank Factorization

    Yen-Chang Hsu, Ting Hua, Sungen Chang, Qian Lou, Yilin Shen, and Hongxia Jin. Language Model Compression with Weighted Low-Rank Factorization . In International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR), 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    HMC-TRAN: A Tensor-core Inspired Hierarchical Model Compression for Transformer-based DNNs on GPU

    Shaoyi Huang, Shiyang Chen, Hongwu Peng, Daniel Manu, Zhenglun Kong, Geng Yuan, Lei Yang, Shusen Wang, Hang Liu, and Caiwen Ding. HMC-TRAN: A Tensor-core Inspired Hierarchical Model Compression for Transformer-based DNNs on GPU . In Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI (GLSVLSI), 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Speeding up Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Rank Expansions

    Max Jaderberg, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. Speeding up Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Rank Expansions . In British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) , 2014

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Compression of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast and Low Power Mobile Applications

    Yong - Deok Kim, Eunhyeok Park, Sungjoo Yoo, Taelim Choi, Lu Yang, and Dongjun Shin. Compression of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast and Low Power Mobile Applications . In Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, editors, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    A Hardware-Friendly Tiled Singular-Value Decomposition-Based Matrix Multiplication for Transformer-Based Models

    Hailong Li, Jaewan Choi, Yongsuk Kwon, and Jung Ho Ahn. A Hardware-Friendly Tiled Singular-Value Decomposition-Based Matrix Multiplication for Transformer-Based Models . IEEE Computer Architecture Letters (CAL), 22: 0 169--172, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    MoDe GPT : Modular Decomposition for Large Language Model Compression

    Chi-Heng Lin, Shangqian Gao, James Seale Smith, Abhishek Patel, Shikhar Tuli, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin, and Yen-Chang Hsu. MoDe GPT : Modular Decomposition for Large Language Model Compression . In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Learning Compact Recurrent Neural Networks

    Zhiyun Lu, Vikas Sindhwani, and Tara N Sainath. Learning Compact Recurrent Neural Networks . In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    LightFormer: Light-weight Transformer Using SVD-based Weight Transfer and Parameter Sharing

    Xiuqing Lv, Peng Zhang, Sunzhu Li, Guobing Gan, and Yueheng Sun. LightFormer: Light-weight Transformer Using SVD-based Weight Transfer and Parameter Sharing . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Compressing Pre-trained Language Models by Matrix Decomposition

    Matan Ben Noach and Yoav Goldberg. Compressing Pre-trained Language Models by Matrix Decomposition . In 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (AACL-IJCNLP) , 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code

    Baptiste Roziere, Jonas Gehring, Fabian Gloeckle, Sten Sootla, Itai Gat, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Yossi Adi, Jingyu Liu, Romain Sauvestre, Tal Remez, et al. Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code . arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12950, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Ash, and Dipendra Misra

    Pratyusha Sharma, Jordan T. Ash, and Dipendra Misra. The Truth is in there: Improving Reasoning in Language Models with Layer-Selective Rank Reduction . In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Cheng Tai, Tong Xiao, Yi Zhang, Xiaogang Wang, and E. Weinan. Convolutional Neural Networks With Low-rank Regularization . In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2016

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models

    Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open Foundation and Finetuned Chat Models . arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Pufferfish: Communication-efficient Models at No Extra Cost

    Hongyi Wang, Saurabh Agarwal, and Dimitris Papailiopoulos. Pufferfish: Communication-efficient Models at No Extra Cost . In Conference on Machine Learning and Systems (MLSys) , 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Coordinating Filters for Faster Deep Neural Networks

    Wei Wen, Cong Xu, Chunpeng Wu, Yandan Wang, Yiran Chen, and Hai Li. Coordinating Filters for Faster Deep Neural Networks . In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2017

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Restructuring of Deep Neural Network Acoustic Models with Singular Value Decomposition

    Jian Xue, Jinyu Li, and Yifan Gong. Restructuring of Deep Neural Network Acoustic Models with Singular Value Decomposition . In Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), January 2013

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Compressing Transformers: Features Are Low-Rank, But Weights Are Not! In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023

    Hao Yu and Jianxin Wu. Compressing Transformers: Features Are Low-Rank, But Weights Are Not! In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    ASVD: Activation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Compressing Large Language Models

    Zhihang Yuan, Yuzhang Shang, Yue Song, Qiang Wu, Yan Yan, and Guangyu Sun. ASVD: Activation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Compressing Large Language Models . arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05821, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    The Schur Complement and Its Applications , volume 4

    Fuzhen Zhang. The Schur Complement and Its Applications , volume 4. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006

    work page 2006