Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Instability of Black Holes in AdS$_3 \times S^3$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Extremal and near-extremal black holes in AdS3 × S3 are generically unstable, decaying into a central black hole dressed by chiral primaries or macroscopic giant strings, with the thermodynamic and dynamical instability onsets coinciding.

desk verdict A clean thermodynamic case for the instability, with honest new giant-string solutions, but the claimed endpoint rests on an additivity assumption that is not yet justified. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04131 v1 pith:WNJLZYAM submitted 2025-07-05 hep-th

Finn Larsen , Siyul Lee This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords BTZblackholesAdS3/CFT2holeinstabilitysuperradiancegiantstringschiralprimariesextremalholographicphasetransitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that most extremal and near-extremal black holes in AdS3 × S3 are unstable to disintegration: thermodynamics favors their decay into a smaller central black hole surrounded by chiral primaries or newly constructed 'giant' strings, and the dynamical onset of the decay, computed from retarded Green's functions in the dual CFT2, coincides with the thermodynamic threshold. If correct, the true ground state in many charge sectors is not an isolated black hole but a composite of a black hole core and BPS matter, and the paper maps out the phase diagram of such composites. The same framework answers what happens in supersymmetric sectors where no single-centered BPS black hole exists: the ground state is a BPS black hole with charge $|Q|=k$ dressed by chiral primary particles. A careful reader should care because this bears directly on the fate of near-extremal black holes and on which states in the CFT correspond to black holes in the bulk.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the first-law comparison written as $\beta\, dS = dM - \Omega\, dJ_3 - \Phi_R\, dQ_R - \Phi_L\, dQ_L$, which in terms of the mass excess $M-M_*$ says that entropy increases when a particle with $e=q$ is emitted from an over-charged black hole with $\Phi>1$. The matching dynamical tool is the retarded Green's function of a conformal probe in the BTZ background: its poles cross into the upper half-plane and its imaginary part becomes negative exactly when the same potentials exceed unity, producing the 'inverted' effective potential that is the AdS analogue of superradiance. The new objects are the Type I ($\rho_C,\theta_C$) and Type II ($\rho_B,\theta_B$) giant strings, four-parameter classical solutions whose charges satisfy BPS bounds and whose macroscopic limit gives charges proportional to $\sqrt{k}\,(1,\cosh 2\rho,\gamma,\pm1)$, so a few strings can carry charges comparable to the black hole.

What would settle it

Compute the fully backreacted, stationary solution for a BTZ black hole surrounded by one of the macroscopic giant strings of section 5 and compare its entropy with the sum-of-parts entropy; if the black hole remnant's entropy at the claimed final charges is not larger than the original entropy, or if no such solution exists at finite $\rho_0$, the disintegration scenario is falsified. A cleaner dynamical version would be to evolve the linear perturbation of section 3 into the nonlinear regime and see whether the condensate actually forms: if the instability saturates without producing the predicted chiral-primary or giant-string condensate, the thermodynamic endpoint is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that BTZ black holes in AdS$_3\times S^3$ with (4,4) supersymmetry are disintegrated rather than stable: whenever the S$^3$ electric potentials $\Phi_L$ or $\Phi_R$ exceed unity, the first law shows that emission of half-BPS chiral primaries increases black hole entropy, and the same condition makes the retarded Green's function of a probe in the BTZ background develop negative dissipation, so the linear-response instability sets in exactly where thermodynamics predicts. The preferred endpoint is a central black hole, typically with charge $Q=k$ on the relevant side, surrounded by chiral primaries or by macroscopic giant strings that carry a significant fraction of the total charge. The paper constructs two four-parameter families of classical giant strings (Type I and Type II) wrapping diagonal circles in both AdS$_3$ and $S^3$, identifies their macroscopic limits whose charges scale like $k$, and derives a four-phase thermodynamic phase diagram (black hole alone, black hole plus one of two giant-string species, or black hole plus both) with analytic phase boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that a giant string can sit at finite radius outside the black hole with its charges simply adding to the black hole's, with no backreaction and no interaction energy, so if that additivity fails the entropy comparisons and the phase diagram do not describe the true ground states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the ground state in super-selection sectors with $Q_L\neq k$ is not an isolated black hole: it is a black hole core dressed by chiral primaries, and for charges that violate extremality the BPS ground state is a BPS black hole at $Q=k$ plus chiral-primary debris.
  • The dynamical calculation gives a concrete bulk mechanism: the same overcharging condition that makes emission thermodynamically favorable produces a negative imaginary part of the retarded Green's function, so the decay is an AdS analogue of superradiance with onset at the thermodynamic threshold.
  • In the presence of macroscopic giant strings the system has four phases (black hole only, black hole plus a left-type giant, black hole plus a right-type giant, black hole plus both), with analytic boundaries, so black hole stability becomes a phase-diagram question rather than an all-or-nothing property.
  • Because the macroscopic giants can carry charges of order $k$ without running afoul of the stringy exclusion principle, they are natural candidates for the 'debris' in the dressed black hole picture even when ordinary chiral primaries with arbitrary charges are unavailable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the backreaction of the giant strings uncalculated; a natural next step is to construct the fully backreacted solution or compute one-loop corrections, since any interaction energy between the core and the strings would shift the phase boundaries in its Figure 7.
  • The same thermodynamic criterion should apply to other compactifications with $S^3$ charges, for instance AdS$_5\times S^5$, where analogues of the Type I/II giants might provide the dressed endpoints.
  • The simple charge relations obeyed by the new strings, such as $e_R=q_R$ for Type II solutions, give a concrete target for a microscopic count in the dual symmetric orbifold CFT; matching that count would test whether the thermodynamic preference is realized in the actual spectrum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the stability of extremal and near-extremal BTZ black holes in AdS3 × S3 supergravity with (4,4) supersymmetry. The authors derive a thermodynamic instability criterion from the first law: when a chemical potential satisfies Φ > 1, emission of BPS-saturating matter can increase the black hole entropy. They show that the most entropic configuration is often a central black hole dressed by chiral primaries or by newly constructed macroscopic "giant strings" that carry charges of order k. They complement this with a linear response analysis of scalar fields in the BTZ background, obtaining the retarded Green's function and identifying poles and negative dissipation when the chiral temperatures become negative, with an onset that matches the thermodynamic threshold. The paper also constructs two new families of classical string solutions (Type I and Type II) in global AdS3 × S3, computes their conserved charges, identifies their BPS limits, and uses their macroscopic limits to build a phase diagram of composite black-hole-plus-giant-string states. The central claim is that many AdS3 × S3 black holes are thermodynamically and dynamically unstable to disintegration into a central black hole surrounded by macroscopic giant strings, and that these composites are the true ground states in certain super-selection sectors.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a concrete gravitational mechanism for the instability of near-extremal AdS3 black holes and a proposal for the ground state in sectors without a single-centered black hole, complementing the grey-galaxy and dual-dressed-black-hole scenarios in higher dimensions. The paper's strengths include a clean first-law derivation of the thermodynamic criterion, an explicit linear response computation whose pole structure matches the thermodynamic onset, and the construction of new families of classical giant string solutions with conserved charges given in closed form. These are substantive and reproducible calculations. However, the identification of the actual decay endpoint with macroscopic giant strings rests on an explicit additivity and no-backreaction assumption that is not justified and that is load-bearing for the phase diagram; this limits the significance of the Section 5 conclusions until the interaction issue is resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Footnote 12, Eqs. (5.19)–(5.22)] The central claim that the ground state is a central black hole surrounded by macroscopic giant strings relies on the assumption, stated in Footnote 12, that the giant strings constructed in global AdS3 can coexist with the black hole with charges simply adding and with no interaction energy. This assumption is not justified in the regime used in Section 5. In AdS3 the Newton constant is G3 = ℓ/(4k), while the black hole and giant string each carry charges and energies of order k. Two such objects separated by a distance of order ℓ interact with gravitational energy G3 MBH Ms /ℓ ~ k, which is the same order as the individual energies. The entropy maximization in Eqs. (5.19)–(5.22) subtracts the string charges from the black hole while keeping the total charges fixed, but if the interaction energy is O(k) this subtraction is invalid and the phase boundaries in Eqs. (5.25)–(5.26) and the four-phase classification in Figure 7 are not established. The paper explicitly defers the interaction computation to future work; as it stands, the endpoint of the instability in the giant-string sector is an assumption, not a derivation.
  2. [§5.1, §5.2, Eqs. (5.25)–(5.26), Figure 7] The phase diagram depends on a free parameter ρ0, the radial position of the macroscopic giant strings, which is introduced in §5.2 as an O(1) number chosen as 'the minimal value of such radial positions' without a dynamical or thermodynamic derivation. The boundaries (5.25) and (5.26), the location of the four-phase point, and even the conditions under which a giant string is emitted all depend on cosh 2ρ0. Since ρ0 is not fixed by any equation of the system, the quantitative content of the phase diagram is parameter-dependent. The authors should either determine ρ0 from a minimization over the giant string moduli or state clearly which qualitative predictions are independent of its value.
  3. [§3.3 and §5] The linear response analysis in Section 3 computes the retarded Green's function for a probe scalar field in the BTZ background and shows a dynamical instability when the chiral temperature is negative. However, the decay product that is thermodynamically favored in Section 5 is a macroscopic giant string, not a scalar field. No computation is presented showing that the unstable mode of the linear response problem has the quantum numbers and the macroscopic size of the giant string solutions of Section 4, nor that the back-reacted endpoint of that instability is the composite state assumed in Section 5. The agreement between the thermodynamic onset and the scalar pole condition is a genuine check for particle-like emission, but it does not by itself establish the dynamical formation of the giant-string composites.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2 and throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected: 'straigtforward' in §3.2, 'wiz.' in §4.2, 'The signs much be chosen' in §4.2, 'an instabillity' in §3.3, and 'negative 1/2-plane' where 'half-plane' is meant.
  2. [§2.2 and §5] The paper repeatedly notes that the spectrum of chiral primaries with large charge is model-dependent and may obey a stringy exclusion principle, but Section 2.2's conclusion that the most entropic debris is always a chiral primary assumes that such states are available with arbitrary charges. This caveat is acknowledged, but the reader would benefit from a single concise statement at the start of Section 2 of which conclusions survive when the chiral-primary spectrum is restricted.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (4.23)] The rescaling ℓT → 1/(2π) is convenient, but the subsequent statement that 'the actual charges scale as √k' is easy to misread because the dimensionless charges defined in Eqs. (4.25)–(4.27) are already rescaled. A short explicit table of the dimensionful charges in terms of k before the rescaling would improve clarity.
  4. [References] Reference [33] is cited as 'The holar wind'; this appears to be a typo for 'The hol...' or a known title, and should be verified. Also, the paper [12] is cited for 'grey galaxies' but the title is given correctly; no action needed there beyond a general final proofread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the thermodynamic and dynamical instability conditions are derived from independent inputs and agree as a consistency check, and the giant-string charges follow from the equations of motion.

full rationale

The paper's central instability claim rests on two separate computations. The thermodynamic criterion (2.7) is derived from the first law and the stated BPS bounds, and the linear-response analysis solves the scalar wave equation in the BTZ background, giving the retarded Green's function (3.14). The agreement between the 'inverted' potential condition (3.2) and the sign of the spectral function (3.16) is a consistency check between these two independent derivations: the wave equation does not import the first-law entropy argument as an input, and the first law does not assume the Green's function. The giant-string solutions in Section 4 are obtained from the DBI+WZ equations of motion, with branches (4.14) and (4.18) solved rather than fitted, and the conserved charges (4.25)-(4.27) are derived from the resulting solutions. The macroscopic scaling forms (5.6) and (5.10) are limits of these derived charges, and the phase diagram of Section 5.2 is an explicit entropy maximization under the stated constraints. The flagged limitations are assumptions rather than circular steps: Footnote 12 in Section 5.1 states that interactions between the black hole and the giant strings are neglected and that the charges of the components simply add, and Section 1 assumes the entropy of matter is negligible and that the total quantum numbers are the sum of the components. These assumptions are load-bearing and could invalidate the endpoint picture if they fail, but they do not make the derivation circular. Self-citations ([28], [38], [39], [48], [51]) are peripheral or standard results with independent derivations available, and none is used to forbid alternatives or to define the central quantities.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of free parameters and assumptions. The main free parameter is rho0, which is chosen by hand and controls the phase boundaries. The key assumptions are the additivity of charges and entropy, the probe approximation, and the existence of the newly constructed giant strings in the spectrum. No new fundamental entities beyond these classical string configurations are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • rho0 (radial position of giant strings) = cosh 2 rho0 = 1.5 in Fig 7; 'O(1)'
    Sets the phase boundary locations (5.25)-(5.26); chosen by hand, not determined by the theory.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The final state entropy equals the black hole entropy; matter entropy and black-hole-matter interactions are negligible.
    Used throughout Section 2 and 5; stated explicitly in Section 2.1 and footnote 12. If false, entropy maximization is invalid.
  • ad hoc to paper The giant strings constructed in global AdS3 can coexist with the black hole, with charges adding.
    Footnote 12: 'We leave the study of interactions between the black hole and the giant strings to future work.'
  • ad hoc to paper The spectrum contains macroscopic giant strings with charges scaling as in (5.11).
    Needed for Phase L/R/LR; existence not proven in the paper.
  • domain assumption Standard AdS3/CFT2 dictionary and Brown-Henneaux central charge c = 6k.
    Invoked throughout; standard but an input to the setup.
  • ad hoc to paper The probe approximation: giant strings do not backreact on the BTZ geometry.
    Stated in Section 4.1 and used in Section 5; no backreaction is taken into account.
invented entities (1)
  • Type I and Type II macroscopic giant strings
    purpose: Decay products / debris that dress the central black hole
    New classical D1-brane solutions introduced in Section 4; no independent experimental or observational evidence, and their existence in the quantum spectrum is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Instability of Black Holes in AdS$_3 \times S^3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WNJLZYAM

@misc{pith2026250704131,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Instability of Black Holes in AdS$_3 \times S^3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WNJLZYAM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04131}
}
abstract

Extremal and near extremal black holes are unstable, unless they are protected by supersymmetry. For black holes in AdS$_3 \times S^3$, we study the range of parameters that bound the unstable region, the fate of extremal black holes that are unstable, and the true ground state in super-selection sectors where no isolated black hole solution exists. Thermodynamics generally favors a central black hole surrounded by chiral primaries that carry a significant fraction of the conserved charges. We give a dynamical interpretation of decay, by computing the linear response functions in the dual CFT$_2$ and showing that the onset of instability agrees with thermodynamics. To understand the nature of the decay products, we construct several new families of classical string solutions. They are ``giants" that move on both the AdS$_3$ and the $S^3$, and may have interesting applications beyond those we develop.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cogito, ergo - strings: Supersymmetric ergoregions and their stringy excitations

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Supersymmetric ergoregions without horizons in NS5-F1-P bound states are shown to admit negative-energy BPS excitations, described via gauged WZW models and mapped holographically to the dual CFT.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 106002 [ 1604.07818]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space , PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [ 1606.01857]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory , JHEP 10 (2017) 008 [ 1703.04612]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Iliesiu and G.J

    L.V. Iliesiu and G.J. Turiaci, The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes , JHEP 05 (2021) 145 [ 2003.02860]. – 45 –

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Heydeman, L.V

    M. Heydeman, L.V. Iliesiu, G.J. Turiaci and W. Zhao, The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 014004 [ 2011.01953]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Boruch, M.T

    J. Boruch, M.T. Heydeman, L.V. Iliesiu and G.J. Turiaci, BPS and near-BPS black holes in AdS5 and their spectrum in N = 4 SYM, 2203.01331

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Turiaci, New insights on near-extremal black holes , 2307.10423

    G.J. Turiaci, New insights on near-extremal black holes , 2307.10423

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Brown, L.V

    A.R. Brown, L.V. Iliesiu, G. Penington and M. Usatyuk, The evaporation of charged black holes, 2411.03447

    arXiv

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Durkee and H.S

    M. Durkee and H.S. Reall, Perturbations of near-horizon geometries and instabilities of Myers-Perry black holes , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 104044 [ 1012.4805]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bena, B.D

    I. Bena, B.D. Chowdhury, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk and M. Shigemori, Moulting Black Holes , JHEP 03 (2012) 094 [ 1108.0411]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Ezroura and F

    N. Ezroura and F. Larsen, Supergravity spectrum of AdS5 black holes , JHEP 12 (2024) 020 [2408.11529]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S. Kim, S. Kundu, E. Lee, J. Lee, S. Minwalla and C. Patel, Grey Galaxies’ as an endpoint of the Kerr-AdS superradiant instability , JHEP 11 (2023) 024 [ 2305.08922]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, E. Lee, S. Minwalla et al., Dual Dressed Black Holes as the end point of the Charged Superradiant instability in N = 4 Yang Mills, 2409.18178

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla and K. Papadodimas, Small Hairy Black Holes in AdS5xS5, JHEP 11 (2011) 035 [ 1005.1287]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Aretakis, Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations I , Commun

    S. Aretakis, Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations I , Commun. Math. Phys. 307 (2011) 17 [ 1110.2007]

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Aretakis, Horizon Instability of Extremal Black Holes , Adv

    S. Aretakis, Horizon Instability of Extremal Black Holes , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 19 (2015) 507 [1206.6598]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Murata, Instability of higher dimensional extreme black holes , Class

    K. Murata, Instability of higher dimensional extreme black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 075002 [ 1211.6903]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Markeviciute and J.E

    J. Markeviciute and J.E. Santos, Hairy black holes in AdS 5 × S5, JHEP 06 (2016) 096 [1602.03893]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Horowitz, M

    G.T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski and J.E. Santos, Almost all extremal black holes in AdS are singular, JHEP 01 (2023) 162 [ 2210.02473]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Horowitz and J.E

    G.T. Horowitz and J.E. Santos, Smooth extremal horizons are the exception, not the rule , JHEP 02 (2025) 169 [ 2411.07295]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bajaj, V

    K. Bajaj, V. Kumar, S. Minwalla, J. Mukherjee and A. Rahaman, Grey Galaxies in AdS5, 2412.06904

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, G. Kwon, E. Lee et al., Supersymmetric Grey Galaxies, Dual Dressed Black Holes and the Superconformal Index , 2501.17217

  15. [23]

    Denef and G.W

    F. Denef and G.W. Moore, Split states, entropy enigmas, holes and halos , JHEP 11 (2011) 129 [hep-th/0702146]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Assel, D

    B. Assel, D. Cassani, L. Di Pietro, Z. Komargodski, J. Lorenzen and D. Martelli, The Casimir Energy in Curved Space and its Supersymmetric Counterpart , JHEP 07 (2015) 043 [1503.05537]. – 46 –

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Arabi Ardehali, F

    A. Arabi Ardehali, F. Larsen, J.T. Liu and P. Szepietowski, Quantum corrections to central charges and supersymmetric Casimir energy in AdS 3/CFT2, JHEP 07 (2019) 071 [1811.12367]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Schwimmer and N

    A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 184 (1987) 191

    1987

  19. [27]

    Maldacena and A

    J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle , JHEP 12 (1998) 005 [ hep-th/9804085]

    1998 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Larsen, Partition functions and elliptic genera from supergravity , JHEP 01 (2007) 002 [ hep-th/0607138]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    de Boer, Six-dimensional supergravity on S**3 x AdS(3) and 2-D conformal field theory , Nucl

    J. de Boer, Six-dimensional supergravity on S**3 x AdS(3) and 2-D conformal field theory , Nucl. Phys. B 548 (1999) 139 [ hep-th/9806104]

    1999 arXiv

  22. [30]

    de Boer, Large N elliptic genus and AdS / CFT correspondence , JHEP 05 (1999) 017 [hep-th/9812240]

    J. de Boer, Large N elliptic genus and AdS / CFT correspondence , JHEP 05 (1999) 017 [hep-th/9812240]

    1999 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bates and F

    B. Bates and F. Denef, Exact solutions for supersymmetric stationary black hole composites , JHEP 11 (2011) 127 [ hep-th/0304094]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy , Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [ hep-th/9601029]

    1996 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Martinec, The holar wind , JHEP 07 (2023) 113 [ 2303.00234]

    E.J. Martinec, The holar wind , JHEP 07 (2023) 113 [ 2303.00234]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cvetic and D

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm, General rotating five-dimensional black holes of toroidally compactified heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B 476 (1996) 118 [ hep-th/9603100]

    1996 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cvetic and F

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, Near horizon geometry of rotating black holes in five-dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 239 [ hep-th/9805097]

    1998 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Banados, C

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time , Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [ hep-th/9204099]

    1992 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Banados, M

    M. Banados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the (2+1) black hole , Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1506 [ gr-qc/9302012]

    1993 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Larsen and S

    F. Larsen and S. Lee, Microscopic entropy of AdS 3 black holes revisited, JHEP 07 (2021) 038 [2101.08497]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Larsen and S

    F. Larsen and S. Lee, Supersymmetric charge constraints on AdS black holes from free fields , JHEP 09 (2024) 118 [ 2405.17648]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity , Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183 [ hep-th/9905111]

    2000 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics , Lect. Notes Phys. 906 (2015) pp.1 [ 1501.06570]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Herzog, Lectures on Holographic Superfluidity and Superconductivity, J

    C.P. Herzog, Lectures on Holographic Superfluidity and Superconductivity, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 343001 [ 0904.1975]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Iqbal, H

    N. Iqbal, H. Liu and M. Mezei, Lectures on holographic non-Fermi liquids and quantum phase transitions, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: String theory and its Applications: From meV to the Planck Scale , pp. 707–816, 10, 2011, DOI [1110.3814]

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hartnoll, A

    S.A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Holographic quantum matter , 1612.07324. – 47 –

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cvetic and F

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, General rotating black holes in string theory: Grey body factors and event horizons , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 4994 [ hep-th/9705192]

    1997 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Birmingham, I

    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S.N. Solodukhin, Conformal field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 151301 [ hep-th/0112055]

    2002 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Iqbal and H

    N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Real-time response in AdS/CFT with application to spinors , Fortsch. Phys. 57 (2009) 367 [ 0903.2596]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Balasubramanian, I

    V. Balasubramanian, I. Garcia-Etxebarria, F. Larsen and J. Simon, Helical Luttinger Liquids and Three Dimensional Black Holes , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 126012 [ 1012.4363]

    2011 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207

    1986

  42. [50]

    Mandal, S

    G. Mandal, S. Raju and M. Smedback, Supersymmetric giant graviton solutions in AdS(3) , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 046011 [ 0709.1168]

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Larsen and E.J

    F. Larsen and E.J. Martinec, U(1) charges and moduli in the D1 - D5 system , JHEP 06 (1999) 019 [ hep-th/9905064]

    1999 arXiv

  44. [52]

    McGreevy, L

    J. McGreevy, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas, Invasion of the giant gravitons from Anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 06 (2000) 008 [ hep-th/0003075]

    2000 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Lunin, S.D

    O. Lunin, S.D. Mathur and A. Saxena, What is the gravity dual of a chiral primary? , Nucl. Phys. B 655 (2003) 185 [ hep-th/0211292]

    2003 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Huang, Giant gravitons in AdS(3) x S**3 x T**4 Spacetime under Melvin field deformation, hep-th/0603198

    W.-H. Huang, Giant gravitons in AdS(3) x S**3 x T**4 Spacetime under Melvin field deformation, hep-th/0603198

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Raju, Counting giant gravitons in AdS(3) , Phys

    S. Raju, Counting giant gravitons in AdS(3) , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 046012 [ 0709.1171]

    2008 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Prinsloo, D1 and D5-brane giant gravitons on AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, JHEP 12 (2014) 094 [1406.6134]

    A. Prinsloo, D1 and D5-brane giant gravitons on AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, JHEP 12 (2014) 094 [1406.6134]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mikhailov, Giant gravitons from holomorphic surfaces , JHEP 11 (2000) 027 [hep-th/0010206]

    A. Mikhailov, Giant gravitons from holomorphic surfaces , JHEP 11 (2000) 027 [hep-th/0010206]

    2000 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Ashok and N.V

    S.K. Ashok and N.V. Suryanarayana, Counting Wobbling Dual-Giants , JHEP 05 (2009) 090 [0808.2042]

    2009 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Words to describe a black hole , JHEP 02 (2023) 109 [2209.06728]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee and J. Park, The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2) , JHEP 09 (2024) 029 [ 2209.12696]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee and J. Park, Towards quantum black hole microstates , JHEP 11 (2023) 175 [ 2304.10155]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee and S. Lee, Finite N black hole cohomologies , JHEP 12 (2024) 029 [ 2312.16443]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes , 2402.10129

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin and H. Zhang, Fortuity in the D1-D5 system , 2501.05448

  57. [65]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Lee, R. Raj and S. Tomar, Probing Non-Graviton Spectra in N = 4 SYM via BMN truncation and S-Duality , 2506.13887. – 48 –

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    de Mello Koch, M

    R. de Mello Koch, M. Kim, S. Kim, J. Lee and S. Lee, Brane-fused black hole operators , 2412.08695

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Hughes and M

    M.R.R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, Fortuity within Supergravity, 2505.14888

  60. [68]

    Giveon, D

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Comments on string theory on AdS(3) , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 733 [ hep-th/9806194]

    1998 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Maldacena and H

    J.M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum, J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 2929 [ hep-th/0001053]

    2001 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Eberhardt, M.R

    L. Eberhardt, M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT, JHEP 04 (2019) 103 [ 1812.01007]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J

    L. Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 064001 [2110.07535]

    2022 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Effective AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 03 (2025) 030 [2501.09119]

    2025 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Mandal and N.V

    G. Mandal and N.V. Suryanarayana, Counting 1/8-BPS dual-giants , JHEP 03 (2007) 031 [hep-th/0606088]

    2007 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Sinha, J

    A. Sinha, J. Sonner and N.V. Suryanarayana, At the horizon of a supersymmetric AdS(5) black hole: Isometries and half-BPS giants , JHEP 01 (2007) 087 [ hep-th/0610002]

    2007 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Sinha and J

    A. Sinha and J. Sonner, Black hole giants , JHEP 08 (2007) 006 [ 0705.0373]

    2007 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Biswas, D

    I. Biswas, D. Gaiotto, S. Lahiri and S. Minwalla, Supersymmetric states of N=4 Yang-Mills from giant gravitons , JHEP 12 (2007) 006 [ hep-th/0606087]

    2007 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Kim and K.-M

    S. Kim and K.-M. Lee, 1/16-BPS Black Holes and Giant Gravitons in the AdS(5) X S**5 Space, JHEP 12 (2006) 077 [ hep-th/0607085]

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Grisaru, R.C

    M.T. Grisaru, R.C. Myers and O. Tafjord, SUSY and goliath , JHEP 08 (2000) 040 [hep-th/0008015]

    2000 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Hashimoto, S

    A. Hashimoto, S. Hirano and N. Itzhaki, Large branes in AdS and their field theory dual , JHEP 08 (2000) 051 [ hep-th/0008016]. – 49 –

    2000 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.