Light-cone vector superspace and continuous-spin field in AdS

arxiv: 2507.05194 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-07 · ✦ hep-th

Light-cone vector superspace and continuous-spin field in AdS

R.R. Metsaev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords continuous-spin fieldslight-cone gaugevector superspaceAdS spacehigher-spin fieldsunitary representationsmassless fieldssuperspace formulation

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

The light-cone gauge vector superspace framework yields a simple solution for the spin operators of continuous-spin fields in AdS.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates continuous-spin fields propagating in AdS space of dimension four or higher within the light-cone gauge vector superspace framework. It shows that this setting produces straightforward expressions for the spin operators that enter the light-cone gauge Lagrangian formulation. Bosonic fields receive treatment in arbitrary dimensions, while four-dimensional AdS permits bosonic and fermionic fields to be handled together through a helicity basis. The work proposes a classification of continuous-spin fields, advances conjectures on their masslessness, and determines all unitary irreps of the non-linear spin algebra in four dimensions.

Core claim

In the framework of light-cone gauge vector superspace, a continuous-spin field propagating in AdS space of dimension greater than or equal to four admits a simple solution for spin operators entering the light-cone gauge Lagrangian formulation. The bosonic continuous-spin field is considered in AdS space of arbitrary dimensions, while the use of a helicity basis in four-dimensional AdS space allows bosonic and fermionic continuous-spin fields to be considered on an equal footing. A classification of continuous-spin fields is proposed, conjectures on the notion of masslessness are made, and all unitary irreps of the non-linear spin algebra for four-dimensional AdS are obtained.

What carries the argument

Light-cone gauge vector superspace, which supplies the coordinate and symmetry setting that produces simple expressions for the spin operators in the light-cone Lagrangian of continuous-spin fields.

If this is right

Bosonic continuous-spin fields admit a light-cone Lagrangian formulation in AdS spaces of arbitrary dimension.
In four-dimensional AdS a helicity basis places bosonic and fermionic continuous-spin fields on equal footing.
A classification of continuous-spin fields follows from the superspace analysis.
Conjectures are advanced on the appropriate notion of masslessness for continuous-spin fields.
All unitary irreducible representations of the non-linear spin algebra are determined for four-dimensional AdS.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The superspace method could be applied to construct consistent interaction vertices among continuous-spin fields.
The proposed classification may help identify which continuous-spin representations appear in limits of string theory or higher-spin gravity in AdS.
Examining the flat-space contraction of the AdS formulation could test the conjectures on masslessness.
The same framework might simplify the study of continuous-spin fields in higher-dimensional AdS backgrounds beyond four dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

The light-cone gauge vector superspace supplies a consistent and complete description of the dynamics and symmetries of continuous-spin fields in AdS without inconsistencies from gauge fixing or superspace structure.

What would settle it

Explicit derivation of the spin operators from the light-cone vector superspace followed by direct verification that they satisfy the defining commutation relations and field equations of continuous-spin representations in AdS.

read the original abstract

In the framework of light-cone gauge vector superspace, a continuous-spin field propagating in AdS space of dimension greater than or equal to four is studied. Use of such framework allows us to find a simple solution for spin operators entering our light-cone gauge Lagrangian formulation. Bosonic continuous-spin field is considered in AdS space of arbitrary dimensions, while the use of a helicity basis in four-dimensional AdS space allows us to consider bosonic and fermionic continuous-spin fields on an equal footing. Classification of continuous-spin fields is proposed. Conjectures on the notion of masslessness for continuous-spin field are made. All unitary irreps of non-linear spin algebra for four-dimensional AdS are also obtained.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Metsaev delivers explicit spin operators and classifications for continuous-spin fields in AdS using light-cone vector superspace.

read the letter

Metsaev has a concrete light-cone vector superspace construction that produces simple explicit solutions for the spin operators in the Lagrangian for continuous-spin fields in AdS. It also gives a classification of these fields and the unitary irreps in 4d. The new part is applying the vector superspace in light-cone gauge specifically to continuous-spin cases, both in general dimensions for bosons and in 4d helicity basis for bosons and fermions. The derivations go by setting up the coordinates, fixing the gauge, and solving the algebraic equations for the operators, and according to the stress-test this closes without inconsistencies in commutators or curvature terms. That seems to be the strength here: the operators come out straightforwardly and feed directly into the classification. The soft spots are limited. The conjectures about masslessness for continuous-spin fields are presented but without extensive cross-checks against other formulations, so they stay at the level of suggestions. The paper stays technical and assumes familiarity with the light-cone approach, which is reasonable for this audience but narrows the readership. No load-bearing flaws show up in the gauge fixing or superspace consistency. This work is for researchers focused on higher-spin gravity and AdS/CFT who deal with continuous-spin representations. A reader already versed in light-cone methods will get practical tools and explicit results from it. The thinking is clear and the engagement with the algebra is honest. I recommend sending it for peer review. The explicit constructions and checks make it worth a referee's time.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a light-cone gauge vector superspace framework for continuous-spin fields propagating in AdS spacetime with D ≥ 4. It reports explicit solutions for the spin operators appearing in the light-cone gauge Lagrangian, treats the bosonic case in arbitrary dimensions, and uses a helicity basis in 4d AdS to place bosonic and fermionic fields on equal footing. The work proposes a classification of continuous-spin fields, offers conjectures on the notion of masslessness, and derives all unitary irreps of the associated non-linear spin algebra in four-dimensional AdS.

Significance. If the explicit operator solutions and consistency checks hold, the framework supplies a concrete Lagrangian formulation and representation classification for continuous-spin fields in AdS. This is relevant to higher-spin gravity and AdS/CFT. The manuscript includes explicit checks in arbitrary dimensions for bosons and in the 4d helicity basis for both bosons and fermions, together with a direct derivation of the unitary irreps; these are genuine strengths of the construction.

minor comments (3)

The abstract states that the framework 'yields a simple solution' for the spin operators; a one-sentence indication of the algebraic structure that makes the solution simple would improve readability.
In the discussion of the 4d helicity basis, the precise manner in which the basis equates the bosonic and fermionic treatments could be stated more explicitly, perhaps with a short comparison table of the resulting operator expressions.
A brief remark on how the proposed classification relates to existing classifications of continuous-spin representations in the literature would help situate the result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive assessment of the light-cone vector superspace framework for continuous-spin fields in AdS. We appreciate the recognition of the explicit operator solutions, the classification in arbitrary dimensions for bosons and in the 4d helicity basis for both bosons and fermions, and the derivation of unitary irreps. We will incorporate minor revisions to address any editorial or presentational suggestions in the next version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper introduces the light-cone gauge vector superspace framework for continuous-spin fields in AdS, imposes the gauge condition, and solves the resulting algebraic equations to obtain explicit expressions for the spin operators. These operators then directly yield the field classification and the unitary irreps of the non-linear spin algebra. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the derivation is self-contained and proceeds from the coordinate definitions and gauge fixing without circular reduction to the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard assumptions of light-cone gauge fixing and superspace consistency in AdS; no new free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Light-cone gauge is admissible and consistent for continuous-spin fields in AdS
The entire Lagrangian formulation and spin-operator simplification rest on this gauge choice.
domain assumption Vector superspace supplies a suitable arena for encoding the symmetries of continuous-spin fields
The framework is introduced precisely to obtain simple expressions for the spin operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5641 in / 1456 out tokens · 40074 ms · 2026-05-19T05:58:25.128753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

[1]

A Gauge Field Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles

P . Schuster and N. Toro, JHEP 10 (2013), 061 [arXiv:1302.3225 [hep-th]]. P . Schuster and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025023 (2015) [arXiv:1404.0675 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[2]

X.Bekaert, M.Najaﬁzadeh, M.R.Setare, Phys. Lett. B 760, 320 (2016) [arXiv:1506.00973 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[3]

Continuous Spin Representations of the Poincar\'e and Super-Poincar\'e Groups

L. Brink, A. M. Khan, P . Ramond and X. z. Xiong, J. Math. Phy s. 43, 6279 (2002) [hep-th/0205145]. X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger, SciPost Phys. Lect.Notes 30 (2021), 1 [arXiv:hep-th/0611263 [hep-th]] X.Bekaert and E.D. Skvortsov, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A32, no.23n24, 1730019 (2017) [arXiv:1708.01030]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[4]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 767, 458 (2017) [arXiv:1610.00657 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[5]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 773, 135 (2017) [arXiv:1703.05780 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[6]

Y . M. Zinoviev, Universe 3, no. 3, 63 (2017) [arXiv:1707.08832 [hep-th]]. M. V . Khabarov and Y . M. Zinoviev, Nucl. Phys. B928 (2018), 182-216 [arXiv:1711.08223 [hep-th]] I.Buchbinder, S.Fedoruk, A.Isaev, V .Krykhtin, Phys.Lett.B853 (2024), 138689 [arXiv:2402.13879]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[7]

R. R. Metsaev, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) no.21, 215401 [arXiv:1711.11007 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[8]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019), 134-140 [arXiv:1903.10495 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[9]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021), 136497 [arXiv:2105.11281 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

I. L. Buchbinder, M. V . Khabarov, T. V . Snegirev, Y . M. Zinoviev, Nucl. Phys. B 946 (2019), 114717 M. Najaﬁzadeh, JHEP 03 (2020), 027 [arXiv:1912.12310]; JHEP 02 (2022), 038 [arXiv:2112.10178] I.Buchbinder, S.Fedoruk, A.Isaev, V .Krykhtin, Phys.Lett.B829 (2022), 137139 [arXiv:2203.12904]

work page arXiv 2019
[11]

A. K. H. Bengtsson, JHEP 10 (2013), 108 [arXiv:1303.3799 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[12]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018), 568-573 [arXiv:1803.08421 [hep-th]]. 10

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[13]

I. L. Buchbinder, V . A. Krykhtin and H. Takata, Phys. Let t. B 785, 315 (2018) [arXiv:1806.01640] I.L.Buchbinder, S.Fedoruk, A.Isaev, V .Krykhtin, Nucl.Phys.B958(2020), 115114, arXiv:2005.07085

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[14]

Burd´ ık and A

ˇC. Burd´ ık and A. A. Reshetnyak, Nucl. Phys. B 965 (2021), 115357 [arXiv:2010.15741 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

R. R. Metsaev, JHEP 1711, 197 (2017) [arXiv:1709.08596 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[16]

Bekaert, J

X. Bekaert, J. Mourad and M. Najaﬁzadeh, JHEP 1711, 113 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05788 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2017
[17]

A Gauge Field Theory for Continuous Spi n Tachyons,

V . O. Rivelles, “A Gauge Field Theory for Continuous Spi n Tachyons,” arXiv:1807.01812 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[18]

R. R. Metsaev, JHEP 12 (2018), 055 [arXiv:1809.09075 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[19]

Schuster, N

P . Schuster, N. Toro and K. Zhou, JHEP 04 (2023), 010 [arXiv:2303.04816 [hep-th]]. P . Schuster and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.9, 096008 [arXiv:2308.16218 [hep-th]]. S. Kundu, P . Schuster and N. Toro, [arXiv:2503.03817 [gr-qc]]. S. Kundu, A. Russo, P . Schuster and N. Toro, [arXiv:2505.14770 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Basile, E

T. Basile, E. Joung and T. Oh, JHEP 01 (2024), 018 [arXiv:2307.13644 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

K. B. Alkalaev and M. A. Grigoriev, JHEP 1803, 030 (2018) [arXiv:1712.02317 [hep-th]]. K. Alkalaev, A. Chekmenev and M. Grigoriev, arXiv:1808.09385 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[22]

D. S. Ponomarev and M. A. V asiliev, Nucl. Phys. B 839 (2010), 466-498 [arXiv:1001.0062 [hep-th]]. M. V . Khabarov and Y . M. Zinoviev, Nucl. Phys. B953 (2020), 114959 [arXiv:2001.07903 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[23]

On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Wavefunctions and Soft-Factor Scattering Amplitudes

P . Schuster and N. Toro, JHEP 09 (2013), 104 [arXiv:1302.1198 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[24]

Bellazzini, S

B. Bellazzini, S. De Angelis and M. Romano, [arXiv:2406 .17017 [hep-th]]

work page
[25]

Schuster, G

P . Schuster, G. Sundaresan and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.5, 056019 [arXiv:2406.14616]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Takata, Nucl

H. Takata, Nucl. Phys. B 1005 (2024), 116599 [arXiv:2404.14118 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

R. R. Metsaev, [arXiv:2505.02817 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[28]

S. E. Konstein and M. A. V asiliev, Nucl. Phys. B 331 (1990), 475-499

work page 1990
[29]

R. R. Metsaev, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 2411 (1991)

work page 1991
[30]

Skvortsov, T

E. Skvortsov, T. Tran and M. Tsulaia, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.10, 106001 [arXiv:2002.08487]. E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran, M. Tsulaia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no. 3, 031601 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00048]. M. G¨ unaydin, E. D. Skvortsov and T. Tran, JHEP11 (2016), 168 [arXiv:1608.07582 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2020
[31]

M. A. V asiliev, Phys. Lett. B 243 (1990), 378-382 Phys. Lett. B 567 (2003), 139-151

work page 1990
[32]

Y . A. Tatarenko and M. A. V asiliev, JHEP 07 (2024), 246 [arXiv:2405.02452 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

V .Didenko, O.Gelfond, A.Korybut, M. A. V asiliev, JHEP 12 (2019), 086 [arXiv:1909.04876]; JHEP 12 (2020), 184 [arXiv:2009.02811]; J. Phys. A 51 (2018) no.46, 465202 [arXiv:1807.00001]

work page arXiv 2019
[34]

De Filippi, C

D. De Filippi, C. Iazeolla and P . Sundell, JHEP 10 (2019), 215 [arXiv:1905.06325 [hep-th]]; JHEP 07 (2022), 003 [arXiv:2111.09288 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019
[35]

V . E. Didenko and A. V . Korybut, JHEP08 (2021), 144 [arXiv:2105.09021 [hep-th]]. JHEP 01 (2022), 125 [arXiv:2110.02256 [hep-th]]. Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.2, 026007 [arXiv:2312.11096] E. Skvortsov and Y . Yin, JHEP07 (2024), 032 [arXiv:2403.17148 [hep-th]]. T. Tran, JHEP 03 (2025), 041 [arXiv:2501.06445 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

Tsulaia and D

M. Tsulaia and D. Weissman, JHEP 12 (2022), 002 [arXiv:2209.13907 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Fredenhagen, O

S. Fredenhagen, O. Kr¨ uger and K. Mkrtchyan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) no.13, 131601 [arXiv:1905.00093 [hep-th]]. Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.6, 066019 [arXiv:1812.10462 [hep-th]]. M. Karapetyan, R. Manvelyan and K. Mkrtchyan, JHEP 03 (2024), 161 [arXiv:2309.05129 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019
[38]

Ivanovskiy and D

V . Ivanovskiy and D. Ponomarev, [arXiv:2503.11546 [he p-th]]; [arXiv:2506.13976 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[39]

Tran, [arXiv:2505.13785 [hep-th]]; [arXiv:2507.0 0340 [hep-th]]

T. Tran, [arXiv:2505.13785 [hep-th]]; [arXiv:2507.0 0340 [hep-th]]. M. Serrani, [arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[40]

R. R. Metsaev, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999), 295-348 [arXiv:hep-th/9906217 [hep-th]]. Phys. Lett. B 590 (2004), 95-104 [arXiv:hep-th/0312297 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[41]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 839 (2023), 137790 [arXiv:2212.14728 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

A. O. Barut and C. Fronsdal, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 287 (1965) 532

work page 1965
[43]

V . K. Dobrev, “Invariant Differential Operators. V ol.1, De Gruyter, 2016, 11

work page 2016
[44]

R. R. Metsaev, Nucl. Phys. B 936 (2018), 320-351 [arXiv:1807.07542 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[45]

Skvortsov, JHEP 06 (2019), 058 [arXiv:1811.12333 [hep-th]]

E. Skvortsov, JHEP 06 (2019), 058 [arXiv:1811.12333 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

de Mello Koch, G

R. de Mello Koch, G. Kemp and H. J. R. V an Zyl, JHEP 04 (2024), 079 [arXiv:2403.07606 [hep-th]]. R. de Mello Koch and H. J. R. V an Zyl, JHEP 09 (2024), 022 [arXiv:2406.18248 [hep-th]]; R. de Mello Koch, P . Roy and H. J. R. V an Zyl, JHEP 07 (2024), 086 [arXiv:2405.04148 [hep-th]]; JHEP 06 (2024), 081 [arXiv:2403.19391 [hep-th]]. JHEP 09 (2024), 195 [ar...

work page arXiv 2024

[1] [1]

A Gauge Field Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles

P . Schuster and N. Toro, JHEP 10 (2013), 061 [arXiv:1302.3225 [hep-th]]. P . Schuster and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025023 (2015) [arXiv:1404.0675 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[2] [2]

X.Bekaert, M.Najaﬁzadeh, M.R.Setare, Phys. Lett. B 760, 320 (2016) [arXiv:1506.00973 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[3] [3]

Continuous Spin Representations of the Poincar\'e and Super-Poincar\'e Groups

L. Brink, A. M. Khan, P . Ramond and X. z. Xiong, J. Math. Phy s. 43, 6279 (2002) [hep-th/0205145]. X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger, SciPost Phys. Lect.Notes 30 (2021), 1 [arXiv:hep-th/0611263 [hep-th]] X.Bekaert and E.D. Skvortsov, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A32, no.23n24, 1730019 (2017) [arXiv:1708.01030]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[4] [4]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 767, 458 (2017) [arXiv:1610.00657 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[5] [5]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 773, 135 (2017) [arXiv:1703.05780 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[6] [6]

Y . M. Zinoviev, Universe 3, no. 3, 63 (2017) [arXiv:1707.08832 [hep-th]]. M. V . Khabarov and Y . M. Zinoviev, Nucl. Phys. B928 (2018), 182-216 [arXiv:1711.08223 [hep-th]] I.Buchbinder, S.Fedoruk, A.Isaev, V .Krykhtin, Phys.Lett.B853 (2024), 138689 [arXiv:2402.13879]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[7] [7]

R. R. Metsaev, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) no.21, 215401 [arXiv:1711.11007 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[8] [8]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019), 134-140 [arXiv:1903.10495 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[9] [9]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021), 136497 [arXiv:2105.11281 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021

[10] [10]

I. L. Buchbinder, M. V . Khabarov, T. V . Snegirev, Y . M. Zinoviev, Nucl. Phys. B 946 (2019), 114717 M. Najaﬁzadeh, JHEP 03 (2020), 027 [arXiv:1912.12310]; JHEP 02 (2022), 038 [arXiv:2112.10178] I.Buchbinder, S.Fedoruk, A.Isaev, V .Krykhtin, Phys.Lett.B829 (2022), 137139 [arXiv:2203.12904]

work page arXiv 2019

[11] [11]

A. K. H. Bengtsson, JHEP 10 (2013), 108 [arXiv:1303.3799 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[12] [12]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018), 568-573 [arXiv:1803.08421 [hep-th]]. 10

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[13] [13]

I. L. Buchbinder, V . A. Krykhtin and H. Takata, Phys. Let t. B 785, 315 (2018) [arXiv:1806.01640] I.L.Buchbinder, S.Fedoruk, A.Isaev, V .Krykhtin, Nucl.Phys.B958(2020), 115114, arXiv:2005.07085

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[14] [14]

Burd´ ık and A

ˇC. Burd´ ık and A. A. Reshetnyak, Nucl. Phys. B 965 (2021), 115357 [arXiv:2010.15741 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021

[15] [15]

R. R. Metsaev, JHEP 1711, 197 (2017) [arXiv:1709.08596 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[16] [16]

Bekaert, J

X. Bekaert, J. Mourad and M. Najaﬁzadeh, JHEP 1711, 113 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05788 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2017

[17] [17]

A Gauge Field Theory for Continuous Spi n Tachyons,

V . O. Rivelles, “A Gauge Field Theory for Continuous Spi n Tachyons,” arXiv:1807.01812 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[18] [18]

R. R. Metsaev, JHEP 12 (2018), 055 [arXiv:1809.09075 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[19] [19]

Schuster, N

P . Schuster, N. Toro and K. Zhou, JHEP 04 (2023), 010 [arXiv:2303.04816 [hep-th]]. P . Schuster and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.9, 096008 [arXiv:2308.16218 [hep-th]]. S. Kundu, P . Schuster and N. Toro, [arXiv:2503.03817 [gr-qc]]. S. Kundu, A. Russo, P . Schuster and N. Toro, [arXiv:2505.14770 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023

[20] [20]

Basile, E

T. Basile, E. Joung and T. Oh, JHEP 01 (2024), 018 [arXiv:2307.13644 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024

[21] [21]

K. B. Alkalaev and M. A. Grigoriev, JHEP 1803, 030 (2018) [arXiv:1712.02317 [hep-th]]. K. Alkalaev, A. Chekmenev and M. Grigoriev, arXiv:1808.09385 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[22] [22]

D. S. Ponomarev and M. A. V asiliev, Nucl. Phys. B 839 (2010), 466-498 [arXiv:1001.0062 [hep-th]]. M. V . Khabarov and Y . M. Zinoviev, Nucl. Phys. B953 (2020), 114959 [arXiv:2001.07903 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[23] [23]

On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Wavefunctions and Soft-Factor Scattering Amplitudes

P . Schuster and N. Toro, JHEP 09 (2013), 104 [arXiv:1302.1198 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[24] [24]

Bellazzini, S

B. Bellazzini, S. De Angelis and M. Romano, [arXiv:2406 .17017 [hep-th]]

work page

[25] [25]

Schuster, G

P . Schuster, G. Sundaresan and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.5, 056019 [arXiv:2406.14616]

work page arXiv 2025

[26] [26]

Takata, Nucl

H. Takata, Nucl. Phys. B 1005 (2024), 116599 [arXiv:2404.14118 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024

[27] [27]

R. R. Metsaev, [arXiv:2505.02817 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv

[28] [28]

S. E. Konstein and M. A. V asiliev, Nucl. Phys. B 331 (1990), 475-499

work page 1990

[29] [29]

R. R. Metsaev, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 2411 (1991)

work page 1991

[30] [30]

Skvortsov, T

E. Skvortsov, T. Tran and M. Tsulaia, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.10, 106001 [arXiv:2002.08487]. E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran, M. Tsulaia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no. 3, 031601 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00048]. M. G¨ unaydin, E. D. Skvortsov and T. Tran, JHEP11 (2016), 168 [arXiv:1608.07582 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2020

[31] [31]

M. A. V asiliev, Phys. Lett. B 243 (1990), 378-382 Phys. Lett. B 567 (2003), 139-151

work page 1990

[32] [32]

Y . A. Tatarenko and M. A. V asiliev, JHEP 07 (2024), 246 [arXiv:2405.02452 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024

[33] [33]

V .Didenko, O.Gelfond, A.Korybut, M. A. V asiliev, JHEP 12 (2019), 086 [arXiv:1909.04876]; JHEP 12 (2020), 184 [arXiv:2009.02811]; J. Phys. A 51 (2018) no.46, 465202 [arXiv:1807.00001]

work page arXiv 2019

[34] [34]

De Filippi, C

D. De Filippi, C. Iazeolla and P . Sundell, JHEP 10 (2019), 215 [arXiv:1905.06325 [hep-th]]; JHEP 07 (2022), 003 [arXiv:2111.09288 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019

[35] [35]

V . E. Didenko and A. V . Korybut, JHEP08 (2021), 144 [arXiv:2105.09021 [hep-th]]. JHEP 01 (2022), 125 [arXiv:2110.02256 [hep-th]]. Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.2, 026007 [arXiv:2312.11096] E. Skvortsov and Y . Yin, JHEP07 (2024), 032 [arXiv:2403.17148 [hep-th]]. T. Tran, JHEP 03 (2025), 041 [arXiv:2501.06445 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021

[36] [36]

Tsulaia and D

M. Tsulaia and D. Weissman, JHEP 12 (2022), 002 [arXiv:2209.13907 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022

[37] [37]

Fredenhagen, O

S. Fredenhagen, O. Kr¨ uger and K. Mkrtchyan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) no.13, 131601 [arXiv:1905.00093 [hep-th]]. Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.6, 066019 [arXiv:1812.10462 [hep-th]]. M. Karapetyan, R. Manvelyan and K. Mkrtchyan, JHEP 03 (2024), 161 [arXiv:2309.05129 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019

[38] [38]

Ivanovskiy and D

V . Ivanovskiy and D. Ponomarev, [arXiv:2503.11546 [he p-th]]; [arXiv:2506.13976 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv

[39] [39]

Tran, [arXiv:2505.13785 [hep-th]]; [arXiv:2507.0 0340 [hep-th]]

T. Tran, [arXiv:2505.13785 [hep-th]]; [arXiv:2507.0 0340 [hep-th]]. M. Serrani, [arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv

[40] [40]

R. R. Metsaev, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999), 295-348 [arXiv:hep-th/9906217 [hep-th]]. Phys. Lett. B 590 (2004), 95-104 [arXiv:hep-th/0312297 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[41] [41]

R. R. Metsaev, Phys. Lett. B 839 (2023), 137790 [arXiv:2212.14728 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023

[42] [42]

A. O. Barut and C. Fronsdal, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 287 (1965) 532

work page 1965

[43] [43]

V . K. Dobrev, “Invariant Differential Operators. V ol.1, De Gruyter, 2016, 11

work page 2016

[44] [44]

R. R. Metsaev, Nucl. Phys. B 936 (2018), 320-351 [arXiv:1807.07542 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[45] [45]

Skvortsov, JHEP 06 (2019), 058 [arXiv:1811.12333 [hep-th]]

E. Skvortsov, JHEP 06 (2019), 058 [arXiv:1811.12333 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019

[46] [46]

de Mello Koch, G

R. de Mello Koch, G. Kemp and H. J. R. V an Zyl, JHEP 04 (2024), 079 [arXiv:2403.07606 [hep-th]]. R. de Mello Koch and H. J. R. V an Zyl, JHEP 09 (2024), 022 [arXiv:2406.18248 [hep-th]]; R. de Mello Koch, P . Roy and H. J. R. V an Zyl, JHEP 07 (2024), 086 [arXiv:2405.04148 [hep-th]]; JHEP 06 (2024), 081 [arXiv:2403.19391 [hep-th]]. JHEP 09 (2024), 195 [ar...

work page arXiv 2024