Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 71 references

Unveiling Novel Resonant Interband Contribution to Polarizability in three-dimensional systems

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a chemical-potential-dependent interband term with $q_zq^2$ scaling appears in the polarizability of three-dimensional Dirac nodal line semimetals and produces a resonance as the chemical potential reaches the band…

desk verdict The paper's headline result—a resonant, chemical-potential-dependent interband polarizability term with q_z q^2 scaling—does not survive the integrals: it vanishes identically after angular integration. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05232 v3 pith:3OTDA4QV submitted 2025-07-07 cond-mat.mes-hall

Vivek Pandey , Snehasish Nandy , Pankaj Bhalla This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords polarizabilityDiracnodallinesemimetalinterbandtransitionschemicalpotentiallong-wavelengthlimitdielectricfunctionresonancerandomphaseapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Within the random phase approximation, the paper argues that the interband polarizability of three-dimensional Dirac nodal line semimetals contains a term that depends explicitly on the chemical potential, a feature with no counterpart in two dimensions. In the long-wavelength limit this term scales as $q_zq^2$ and becomes resonant as the chemical potential approaches the band edge, potentially dominating the conventional quadratic response. Because polarizability determines screening, plasmons, and the dielectric function, the claim points to doping or gating as a practical knob for tuning the optical and dielectric behavior of these materials. The paper also maps out the frequency regimes: intraband processes dominate at low frequency, interband processes at intermediate and high frequency, and a parity-time-breaking mass term can reverse the sign of the intraband response. Material-specific estimates for Ca$_3$P$_2$ and ZrSiS indicate the effect is large enough to be experimentally relevant.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the long-wavelength Taylor expansion of the density-density response function, Eq. (3), applied to a minimal two-band $k\cdot p$ Hamiltonian $H=\varepsilon_0[(\tilde{K}-1)\sigma_x+\gamma\tilde{k}_z\sigma_y+\tilde{M}\sigma_z]$ for a Dirac nodal line semimetal. The eigenfunction angle $\theta_{\pm}=\tan^{-1}(\gamma\tilde{k}_z/(\tilde{K}-1))$ enters the overlap matrix elements, and its wave-vector gradient produces the factor $q_z$ that makes the new interband term vanish in 2D. After the $k_z$ integral is performed using $\delta(\tilde{\mu}-\tilde{\varepsilon}_k)$, the new term carries a denominator $(\tilde{\mu}^2-\tilde{M}^2)^2$, which is the mechanism for the resonant enhancement as the chemical potential approaches the band edge. The same expansion also yields the conventional $q^2$ interband background, the Drude-like intraband $q^2/\tilde{\omega}^2$ term, and the mass-term dependence that drives the sign change in the intraband response.

What would settle it

Compute the exact RPA density-density response of the same two-band nodal-line Hamiltonian numerically from the band occupations and overlap factors without Taylor expanding in $q$, in the regime $0<\tilde{\mu}-\tilde{M}\ll 1$ with small fixed $q$. If the result does not show a growing resonant peak with the $1/(\tilde{\mu}^2-\tilde{M}^2)^2$ scaling as $\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{M}$, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the interband part of the polarizability of a three-dimensional Dirac nodal line semimetal is not exhausted by the conventional chemical-potential-independent background. When the density-density response function is expanded to leading order in the long-wavelength limit, an extra term $P_2^{+-}$ appears that is proportional to $q_z$, carries an overall $q_zq^2$ wave-vector scaling, and depends on the chemical potential through a factor $1/[ (\tilde{\mu}^2-\tilde{M}^2)^2 (\tilde{\omega}+2\tilde{\mu}) ]$. This term has no two-dimensional counterpart: it vanishes when out-of-plane momentum transfer goes to zero, which is why it never appears in 2D nodal-line or graphene-type analyses. As the chemical potential approaches the band edge $\tilde{\mu}=\tilde{M}$, the denominator makes the term grow sharply, so the response develops a resonant feature tied to doping rather than to frequency alone. The paper further claims that this new term can dominate the conventional $q^2$ interband response, that interband transitions govern intermediate and high frequencies while intraband transitions govern low frequencies, and that a mass term breaking parity-time symmetry reverses the sign of the intraband response, marking a metal-insulator crossover.

Load-bearing premise

The small-momentum Taylor expansion of the energy, the Fermi functions, and the overlap matrix elements is assumed to remain valid all the way up to the Fermi surface, even when the Fermi surface shrinks to a point at the band edge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Doping or electrostatic gating should continuously tune the dielectric response of a 3D nodal line semimetal, since the interband contribution changes from a nearly constant background into a sharp feature as the chemical potential approaches the band edge.
  • Screening becomes anisotropic: the out-of-plane momentum component enters through the $q_zq^2$ term, so plasmon dispersions and screening lengths should differ for in-plane versus out-of-plane momentum transfer.
  • Optical measurements at intermediate and high frequencies should see interband transitions overtake the Drude-like intraband response, with a transition peak whose position is tied to the chemical potential.
  • A gap-opening mass term flips the sign of the intraband polarizability, giving a dielectric signature that tracks the metal-to-insulator transition as strain, pressure, or fields open the gap.
  • For Ca$_3$P$_2$ at the parameters chosen in the paper, the interband part is roughly eighty times the intraband part, indicating a measurable dielectric response; for ZrSiS the two contributions are comparable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The obvious next test is to integrate the full RPA response numerically without the small-$q$ expansion in the regime $\tilde{\mu}-\tilde{M}\ll 1$; if the peak disappears, the resonance is an artifact of the expansion rather than a property of the model.
  • The same expansion logic could be applied to other three-dimensional band structures with line or surface nodes; whether a $\mu$-dependent interband term is generic to 3D or specific to the ring-node geometry is not settled by this paper.
  • A frequency-resolved and gate-dependent optical or electron-energy-loss measurement on a doped nodal line material could separate this resonance from the conventional interband background and from the band-edge transition at $\tilde{\omega}=2\tilde{M}$.
  • Strain or pressure tuning of the mass term provides a second control axis, and the predicted sign change in the intraband response could serve as a dielectric marker of gap opening.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the RPA density-density polarizability of three-dimensional Dirac nodal-line semimetals in the long-wavelength limit. Starting from a two-band k·p model, the authors split the response into intraband and interband contributions and claim to uncover a new chemical-potential-dependent interband term proportional to q_z q_rho^2, which resonates when the chemical potential approaches the band edge (mu = M) and has no analogue in two dimensions. They analyze its frequency dependence, discuss plasmon modes, and provide material-specific estimates for Ca3P2 and ZrSiS. The central novelty is the existence and resonant behavior of this P_2 term.

Significance. If the claimed effect were correct, it would be significant: a chemical-potential-tunable interband channel with q_z q^2 scaling could modify screening and plasmonic response in nodal-line semimetals and provide an experimental fingerprint. The manuscript is clearly organized, contains explicit analytical derivations, and attempts material-specific estimates, which are commendable. However, the central claim does not survive a correct evaluation of the defining integral: the P_2 term vanishes identically after the azimuthal and k_z integrations in Eq. (6). The paper's main conclusions, abstract, and comparison table therefore rest on an invalid result.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B.1, Eq. (8)] Equation (8) is not the delta-function integral of Eq. (6). For the Hamiltonian of Sec. III.A, one has q·grad theta_+ = [gamma(K-1)q_z - gamma k_z q_rho cosphi]/D and q·grad epsilon_+ = q_rho(K-1)cosphi/epsilon + gamma^2 k_z q_z/epsilon, with D = (K-1)^2 + gamma^2 k_z^2. The P_2^{+-} integrand in Eq. (6) is proportional to (q·grad theta_+)^2 (q·grad epsilon_+) delta(mu - epsilon_+). After integrating phi from 0 to 2pi, the result is pi[2 a^2 d - 2 a b c + b^2 d] with a = gamma(K-1)q_z/D, b = gamma k_z q_rho/D, c = q_rho(K-1)/epsilon, d = gamma^2 k_z q_z/epsilon; every term is odd in k_z, while delta(mu - epsilon_+) is even in k_z. The k_z integral therefore vanishes identically, so P_2^{+-} = 0 for all q. Equation (8) omits the azimuthal average and the q·grad epsilon factor and treats q_rho as a radial variable; it cannot be obtained from Eq. (6). Since the text itself notes that P_2^{-+} has no delta term, the complete chemical-potential-dependent interband contribution P_2^{mn} is zero.
  2. [Sec. III.B.1, Eqs. (9)-(10), Fig. 2, Table II] Because P_2^{mn} = 0, the resonant peaks at mu = M shown in Fig. 2 and the mu^{-1} power laws attributed to the 'mu-dependent part' in Table II are artifacts of the erroneous reduction in Eq. (8). The abstract's central claim of a novel interband contribution with explicit chemical-potential dependence and cubic wave-vector scaling is unsupported. The statements in the Introduction and Summary that this term 'can even dominate over the conventional q^2 contribution' and has 'no counterpart in two dimensions' rest entirely on this invalid term.
  3. [Sec. V and Eq. (8)] Independent of the algebraic cancellation, the resonance at mu = M lies outside the domain of validity of the long-wavelength expansion used to derive it. The expansion in Eq. (3) and Appendix A is controlled by q·grad_k, and near the band edge the Fermi momentum satisfies k_F proportional to sqrt(mu^2 - M^2), so q/k_F diverges as mu approaches M. The manuscript itself concedes in Section V that the Taylor expansion of the energy, Fermi functions, and overlap matrix elements is 'no longer valid' for q >> k_F. Thus the 1/(mu^2 - M^2)^2 prefactor in Eq. (8) is not a physical resonance but a symptom of expanding beyond the radius of convergence.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A1)] The overlap matrix element ansatz |<m,k+q|n,k>|^2 = 1 + mn cos(2 delta theta_{kq}) is not correctly normalized. For m = n and q = 0 it gives 1 + 1 = 2 instead of 1. For the two-component spinors of the Sec. III.A model, the exact interband overlap at small momentum transfer behaves as sin^2(delta theta/2) up to the usual spin-degeneracy factor, not as 1 - cos(2 delta theta). Consequently the coefficient of (q·grad theta)^2 in Eq. (A7) is wrong by a numerical factor, which affects the magnitudes of P_1^{mn} and P_2^{mn} and hence the material-specific estimates in Sec. V.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B.1, Eq. (8)] The notation q_rho is used inconsistently: in Eq. (8) it appears inside an integral over K as if it were a radial variable, while in Eq. (9) it is a fixed parameter; this obscures the missing azimuthal integration that is essential to the vanishing of P_2.
  2. [Eqs. (3), (A7), (B1)-(B3)] There are numerous typographical issues, including missing parentheses, misplaced superscripts, and inconsistent tilde notation, which make verification of the derivations unnecessarily difficult; the manuscript should be carefully proofread.
  3. [Sec. II, after Eq. (2)] The statement that the imaginary part of the polarizability vanishes in the specified regime should be substantiated with an explicit expression, since Eq. (6) contains delta(mu - epsilon^m_k) terms that generally contribute to the imaginary part at omega + omega^{mn} = 0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the chemical-potential-dependent interband term is obtained by evaluating the standard RPA expansion for a specified model Hamiltonian, not by fitting or by importing the conclusion through self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The paper starts from the standard RPA density-density response expression, Eq. (2), expands the energy, Fermi functions, and form factors in q (Appendix A), and obtains the general long-wavelength interband formula Eq. (6). The chemical potential mu and mass M are model parameters in the k.p Hamiltonian, Eq. (7), not quantities fitted to the target polarizability. The claimed P_2^{+-} term, Eq. (8), is an evaluation of Eq. (6) for the DNLSM band structure, with theta^+ = tan^{-1}[gamma k_z/(K-1)]; the resonant factor 1/(mu^2 - M^2)^2 arises from the delta-function constraint delta(mu - epsilon^+) after the k_z integral, not from an input assumption that the resonance exists. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or load-bearing prior result of the same authors is invoked to force the conclusion. The paper's self-citations (e.g., Refs. [50,51,60]) supply model ingredients such as the PT-breaking mass term and tilt, but the central polarizability calculation does not reduce to those references. The paper explicitly states its long-wavelength limitation (Section V: for q >> k_F the Taylor expansion of energy, Fermi-Dirac distribution, and overlap matrix elements is no longer valid); this is a validity caveat about the expansion regime, not a circularity. Any concern about the uncontrolled expansion near the band edge, or about the parity/angular integration of Eq. (8), is a mathematical-correctness issue, not an instance of the derivation being equivalent by construction to its inputs. The result is a model calculation whose output differs structurally from its input assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the two-band k.p model, RPA, low-temperature Fermi functions, and a specific overlap expansion. No new particles or entities are introduced. The material parameters are external inputs from prior DFT fits, not fitted to the polarizability result. The overlap expansion for finite M is the most fragile ingredient.

free parameters (3)
  • k_0 (nodal ring radius) = Ca3P2: 0.206 A^-1, ZrSiS: 4.3 A^-1
    Taken from prior DFT fits (Refs [34,58,59]); used only for material-specific estimates in Section V, not fitted to the polarizability result.
  • epsilon_0 (nodal ring energy) = Ca3P2: 0.184 eV, ZrSiS: 70 eV
    Taken from prior DFT fits (Refs [34,58,59]); enters the dimensionless scaling of mu, omega, q, and M in the model.
  • gamma (velocity anisotropy parameter) = Ca3P2: 2.80, ZrSiS: 0.20
    Taken from prior DFT fits (Refs [34,58,59]); controls the k_z coupling in the Hamiltonian and affects the q_z q^2 term.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The NLSM is described by the two-band k.p Hamiltonian H = epsilon0[(K~-1)sigma_x + gamma k~_z sigma_y + M~ sigma_z].
    Section III.A. This is the standard low-energy model for Dirac nodal line semimetals; the central claim is derived within this model.
  • standard math The polarizability is computed in the random phase approximation and in the long-wavelength limit q to 0, keeping terms up to O(q^3).
    Section II. The RPA expression (Eq. 2) is the starting point; the q-expansion is standard.
  • domain assumption At low temperature, the Fermi functions for the conduction and valence bands are Theta(mu - epsilon^+) and 1, respectively.
    Section II, Eq. (6). Assumes doped Dirac-type system with filled valence band.
  • ad hoc to paper The overlap matrix element is |<m,k+q|n,k>|^2 = 1 + mn cos(2 delta_theta^mn_{kq}) with theta^m_k = theta^n_k.
    Appendix A, Eq. (A7). This form appears to neglect the polar-angle gradient for M != 0 and may carry an incorrect angular prefactor; the central massive-case results rely on it.
  • domain assumption The response is evaluated in the regime max{...} < omega~ < 2 mu~, where the imaginary part of the polarizability vanishes.
    Section III.A. Restricts to the real part away from pair-production processes.
  • domain assumption Material-specific parameters for Ca3P2 (k_0 = 0.206 A^-1, epsilon_0 = 0.184 eV, gamma = 2.80) and ZrSiS (k_0 = 4.3 A^-1, epsilon_0 = 70 eV, gamma = 0.20) are taken from Refs [34,58,59].
    Section V. Used for numerical estimates; the ZrSiS parameters appear inconsistent with typical Brillouin zone sizes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling Novel Resonant Interband Contribution to Polarizability in three-dimensional systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3OTDA4QV

@misc{pith2026250705232,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling Novel Resonant Interband Contribution to Polarizability in three-dimensional systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3OTDA4QV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05232}
}
abstract

Polarizability plays an essential role in characterizing key phenomena, such as the screening effects, collective excitations, and dielectric functions present in the system. In three-dimensional materials, it typically comprises an intraband contribution, dependent on the chemical potential, and an interband contribution, largely independent of it. In this study, within the random phase approximation framework, we uncover a novel interband contribution that, unlike the conventional case, exhibits an explicit dependence on the chemical potential, which has no counterpart in two dimensions. In the long-wavelength limit, this term introduces a resonance feature with cubic wave-vector dependence when the chemical potential approaches the band edge, in contrast to the quadratic behavior characteristic of standard intraband and interband processes. Focusing on three-dimensional Dirac nodal line semimetals, we show that the polarizability is intraband-dominated at low frequencies, while interband processes prevail at intermediate and high frequencies, with the overall response being tunable via the chemical potential. Material-specific estimates for Ca$_3$P$_2$ and ZrSiS reveal a strong tunability of both contributions. These findings open new directions for probing frequency-dependent dielectric properties and hold promise for applications in tunable plasmonic and optoelectronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05232 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The schematic shows the different components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The plot illustrates the interband component of the polarizability (in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The P [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plot depicts the comparison between the intraband [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The first part can be evaluated using Eq

    Chemical potential dependent contribution (P mn 2 ) The chemical potential dependent contribution P mn 2 for considered DNLSM system consists of two parts: P+− 2 and P −+ 2 . The first part can be evaluated using Eq. (6) as P+− 2 = Z ∞ 0 ˜Kd ˜K 4π2 ˜qz γ˜qρ˜kz0 −γ( ˜K −1)˜qz 2 (˜ω+ 2˜µ+iη)(˜µ2 − ˜M 2)2 Θ(˜k2 z0),(8) where ˜µ=µ/ε 0. To obtain the above equ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (6), P+− 1 =− Z ∞ 0 Z +∞ −∞ ˜Kd ˜Kd ˜kz 4π2 γ˜qρ˜kz −γ( ˜K −1)˜qz 2 (˜ω+ 2˜ε+ k +iη) (˜ε+ k )2 − ˜M 2 2

    Chemical potential independent contribution (P mn 1 ) The conventional chemical potential independent part for DNLSMs arises from Eq. (6), P+− 1 =− Z ∞ 0 Z +∞ −∞ ˜Kd ˜Kd ˜kz 4π2 γ˜qρ˜kz −γ( ˜K −1)˜qz 2 (˜ω+ 2˜ε+ k +iη) (˜ε+ k )2 − ˜M 2 2 . (11) It is to be noted that the above equation for P +− 1 survives only for the case of Θ(˜µ−˜ε + k ) = 0. While in t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Fermi-Dirac distribution function difference f(ε m k+q)−f(ε n k) =f(ε m k )−f(ε n k) + X γ qγ ∂γf(ε m k ) + 1 2 X α,β qαqβ ∂αβf(ε m k ) + 1 6 X α′,β′,ℓ qα′qβ′qℓ ∂α′β′ℓf(ε m k ) +O(q 4),(A2) where∂ γ ≡∂/∂k γ andOrefers to higher order terms

    work page

  4. [4]

    Energy dispersion difference εm k+q −ε n k =ω mn + X γ qγ ∂γεm k + 1 2 X α,β qαqβ ∂αβεm k + 1 6 X α′,β′,ℓ qα′qβ′qℓ ∂α′β′ℓεm k +O(q 4),(A3) whereω mn =ε m k −ε n k

    work page

  5. [5]

    On further expanding cos(A+h) for smallhwhereA=δθ mn k andh= P γ qγ ∂γθm k + P α,β 1 2 qαqβ ∂αβθm k +O(q 3) yields cos(A+h) = cosA−hsinA− h2 2 cosA+ h3 6 sinA+· · ·

    Angular factor cos 2δθmn kq Let us first consider δθmn kq =θ m k+q −θ n k =δθ mn k + X γ qγ ∂γθm k + 1 2 X α,β qαqβ ∂αβθm k + 1 6 X α′,β′,ℓ qα′qβ′qℓ ∂α′β′ℓθm k +O(q 4).(A4) Hereδθ mn k =θ m k −θ n k. On further expanding cos(A+h) for smallhwhereA=δθ mn k andh= P γ qγ ∂γθm k + P α,β 1 2 qαqβ ∂αβθm k +O(q 3) yields cos(A+h) = cosA−hsinA− h2 2 cosA+ h3 6 sin...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Giuliani G and Vignale G 2008Quantum theory of the electron liquid(Cambridge university press)

    work page

  7. [7]

    Hasan M Z and Kane C L 2010Rev. Mod. Phys.82(4) 3045–3067 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.3045

    work page

  8. [8]

    Hasan M Z and Moore J E 2011Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.255–78 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-062910-140432

    work page

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    org/10.1038/nature08916

    Moore J E 2010Nature464194–198 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nature08916

    doi

  2. [10]

    Qi X L and Zhang S C 2011Rev. Mod. Phys.83(4) 1057–1110 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.83.1057

  3. [11]

    Franz M and Molenkamp L 2013Topological insulators vol 6 (Elsevier)

  4. [12]

    Das Sarma S, Hwang E H and Min H 2015Phys. Rev. B91(3) 035201 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.91.035201

  5. [13]

    Hwang E H and Das Sarma S 2007Phys. Rev. B 75(20) 205418 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.75.205418

  6. [14]

    Armitage N P, Mele E J and Vishwanath A 2018Rev. Mod. Phys.90(1) 015001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015001

    doi

  7. [15]

    Young S M, Zaheer S, Teo J C Y, Kane C L, Mele E J and Rappe A M 2012Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(14) 140405 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.108.140405

  8. [16]

    Liu Z, Jiang J, Zhou B, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Weng H, Prabhakaran D, Mo S K, Peng H, Dudin Pet al.2014 Nature materials13677–681 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/nmat3990

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    Borisenko S, Gibson Q, Evtushinsky D, Zabolotnyy V, B¨ uchner B and Cava R J 2014Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(2) 027603 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.113.027603

  10. [18]

    Yi H, Wang Z, Chen C, Shi Y, Feng Y, Liang A, Xie Z, He S, He J, Peng Yet al.2014Scientific Reports46106 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep06106

    doi

  11. [19]

    Wang Z, Weng H, Wu Q, Dai X and Fang Z 2013 Phys. Rev. B88(12) 125427 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.125427

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    Liu Z, Zhou B, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Weng H, Prabhakaran D, Mo S K, Shen Z, Fang Z, Dai Xet al.2014Science 343864–867 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1245085

    doi

  13. [21]

    Yan B and Felser C 2017Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics8337–354 ISSN 1947-5462 URL https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025458

    1947 doi

  14. [22]

    Lv B Q, Weng H M, Fu B B, Wang X P, Miao H, Ma J, Richard P, Huang X C, Zhao L X, Chen G F, Fang Z, Dai X, Qian T and Ding H 2015Phys. Rev. X 5(3) 031013 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevX.5.031013

  15. [23]

    Soluyanov A A, Gresch D, Wang Z, Wu Q, Troyer M, Dai X and Bernevig B A 2015Nature527495–498 URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15768

    doi

  16. [24]

    1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025225

    Hasan M Z, Xu S Y, Belopolski I and Huang S M 2017Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics8289–309 ISSN 1947-5462 URLhttps: //www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10. 1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025225

    1947

  17. [25]

    Weng H, Fang C, Fang Z, Bernevig B A and Dai X 2015 Phys. Rev. X5(1) 011029 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011029

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Xu N, Weng H, Lv B, Matt C E, Park J, Bisti F, Strocov V N, Gawryluk D, Pomjakushina E, Conder Ket al.2016 Nature communications711006 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms11006

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    Belopolski I, Xu S Y, Sanchez D S, Chang G, Guo C, Neupane M, Zheng H, Lee C C, Huang S M, Bian G, Alidoust N, Chang T R, Wang B, Zhang X, Bansil A, Jeng H T, Lin H, Jia S and Hasan M Z 2016Phys. Rev. Lett.116(6) 066802 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.066802

    doi

  20. [28]

    science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.1501092

    Xu S Y, Belopolski I, Sanchez D S, Zhang C, Chang G, Guo C, Bian G, Yuan Z, Lu H, Chang T R, Shibayev P P, Prokopovych M L, Alidoust N, Zheng H, Lee C C, Huang S M, Sankar R, Chou F, Hsu C H, Jeng H T, Bansil A, Neupert T, Strocov V N, Lin H, Jia S and Hasan M Z 2015Science Ad...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Zyuzin A A, Wu S and Burkov A A 2012Phys. Rev. B85(16) 165110 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.85.165110

  22. [30]

    Das Sarma S and Hwang E H 2009Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(20) 206412 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.102.206412

  23. [31]

    Thakur A, Sachdeva R and Agarwal A 2017Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29105701 URLhttps:// dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa57bd

    doi

  24. [32]

    Wu C H 2018arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00169URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.00169

    doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ahn S, Hwang E and Min H 2016Scientific reports6 34023 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep34023

    doi

  26. [34]

    Burkov A A, Hook M D and Balents L 2011Phys. Rev. B84(23) 235126 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.84.235126

  27. [35]

    1088/1674-1056/25/11/117106

    Fang C, Weng H, Dai X and Fang Z 2016Chinese Physics B25117106 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/1674-1056/25/11/117106

  28. [36]

    Yang S Y, Yang H, Derunova E, Parkin S S P, Yan B and Ali M N 2018Advances in Physics: X31414631 URL https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2017.1414631

    2017

  29. [37]

    Bian G, Chang T R, Zheng H, Velury S, Xu S Y, Neupert T, Chiu C K, Huang S M, Sanchez D S, Belopolski I, Alidoust N, Chen P J, Chang G, Bansil A, Jeng H T, Lin H and Hasan M Z 2016Phys. Rev. B93(12) 121113 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.93.121113

  30. [38]

    Fang C, Chen Y, Kee H Y and Fu L 2015Phys. Rev. B92(8) 081201 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.92.081201 14

  31. [39]

    Xie L S, Schoop L M, Seibel E M, Gibson Q D, Xie W and Cava R J 2015APL Materials3083602 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4926545

    doi

  32. [40]

    Kim Y, Wieder B J, Kane C L and Rappe A M 2015Phys. Rev. Lett.115(3) 036806 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036806

    doi

  33. [41]

    Ekahana S A, Wu S C, Jiang J, Okawa K, Prabhakaran D, Hwang C C, Mo S K, Sasagawa T, Felser C, Yan B, Liu Z and Chen Y 2017New Journal of Physics19065007 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa75a1

    doi

  34. [42]

    Xu Q, Yu R, Fang Z, Dai X and Weng H 2017Phys. Rev. B95(4) 045136 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.045136

    doi

  35. [43]

    Takane D, Wang Z, Souma S, Nakayama K, Trang C X, Sato T, Takahashi T and Ando Y 2016Phys. Rev. B94(12) 121108 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.121108

  36. [44]

    Chen C, Xu X, Jiang J, Wu S C, Qi Y P, Yang L X, Wang M X, Sun Y, Schr¨ oter N B M, Yang H F, Schoop L M, Lv Y Y, Zhou J, Chen Y B, Yao S H, Lu M H, Chen Y F, Felser C, Yan B H, Liu Z K and Chen Y L 2017Phys. Rev. B95(12) 125126 URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125126

    doi

  37. [45]

    Wang X B, Ma X M, Emmanouilidou E, Shen B, Hsu C H, Zhou C S, Zuo Y, Song R R, Xu S Y, Wang G, Huang L, Ni N and Liu C 2017Phys. Rev. B96(16) 161112 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.96.161112

  38. [46]

    Chang P Y 2025arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02329URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.02329

    doi

  39. [47]

    doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/41/6/067301

    Zhu Y, Zhao B, Xue Y, Xu W, Xu W and Yang Z 2024 Chinese Physics Letters41067301 URLhttps://dx. doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/41/6/067301

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Rukelj Z, Kupˇ ci´ c I and Radi´ c D 2024Symmetry16URL https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/16/1/38

  41. [49]

    Rahimpoor H and Abedinpour S H 2024Phys. Rev. B109(4) 045120 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.109.045120

  42. [50]

    Yan Z, Huang P W and Wang Z 2016Phys. Rev. B93(8) 085138 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.93.085138

  43. [51]

    Xue S, Wang M, Li Y, Zhang S, Jia X, Zhou J, Shi Y, Zhu X, Yao Y and Guo J 2021Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(18) 186802 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.127.186802

  44. [52]

    Barati S and Abedinpour S H 2017Phys. Rev. B 96(15) 155150 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.96.155150

  45. [53]

    Wang C, Xu W H, Zhu C Y, Chen J N, Zhou Y L, Deng M X, Duan H J and Wang R Q 2021Phys. Rev. B 103(16) 165104 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.103.165104

  46. [54]

    org/10.1209/0295-5075/acde5e

    Flores-Calder´ on R, Medel L and Mart ´ ın-Ruiz A 2023 Europhysics Letters14316001 URLhttps://dx.doi. org/10.1209/0295-5075/acde5e

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Pandey V, Joy D, Culcer D and Bhalla P 2024Phys. Rev. B110(15) 155108 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.155108

    doi

  48. [56]

    Pandey V and Bhalla P 2025physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Lettersn/a2500108 URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ pssr.202500108

  49. [57]

    Chiba T, Takahashi S and Bauer G E W 2017Phys. Rev. B95(9) 094428 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094428

    doi

  50. [58]

    Kot P, Parnell J, Habibian S, Straßer C, Ostrovsky P M and Ast C R 2020Phys. Rev. B101(23) 235116 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 101.235116

    doi

  51. [59]

    Chen Q, Du L and Fiete G A 2018Phys. Rev. B97(3) 035422 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.97.035422

  52. [60]

    Rendy B and Hasdeo E H 2021Journal of Applied Physics129014306 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0030200

    doi

  53. [61]

    Du L, Hasan T, Castellanos-Gomez A, Liu G B, Yao Y, Lau C N and Sun Z 2021Nature Reviews Physics3193–206 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-020-00276-0

  54. [62]

    Liu W E, Liu H and Culcer D 2014Phys. Rev. B89(19) 195417 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.89.195417

  55. [63]

    Chan Y H, Chiu C K, Chou M Y and Schnyder A P 2016Phys. Rev. B93(20) 205132 URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.205132

    doi

  56. [64]

    Schilling M B, Schoop L M, Lotsch B V, Dressel M and Pronin A V 2017Phys. Rev. Lett.119(18) 187401 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 119.187401

    doi

  57. [65]

    Pandey V and Bhalla P 2025New Journal of Physics27 073501 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ ade46a

    doi

  58. [66]

    Chang P Y and Yee C H 2017Phys. Rev. B 96(8) 081114 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.96.081114

  59. [67]

    Chorsi H, Cheng B, Zhao B, Toudert J, Asadchy V, Shoron O F, Fan S and Matsunaga R 2022 Advanced Functional Materials322110655 URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/adfm.202110655

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201904498

    Chi S, Liang F, Chen H, Tian W, Zhang H, Yu H, Wang G, Lin Z, Hu J and Zhang H 2020Advanced Materials 321904498 URLhttps://advanced.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201904498

    doi

  61. [69]

    Zhou W, Rudenko A N and Yuan S 2020 Advanced Electronic Materials61900860 URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/aelm.201900860

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    Shao Y, Sternbach A J, Kim B S Y, Rikhter A A, Xu X, Giovannini U D, Jing R, Chae S H, Sun Z, Lee S H, Zhu Y, Mao Z, Hone J C, Queiroz R, Millis A J, Schuck P J, Rubio A, Fogler M M and Basov D N 2022Science Advances8eadd6169 URLhttps://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.add6169

    doi

  63. [71]

    Stauber T 2014Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 26123201 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/ 26/12/123201

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.