Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 99 references

Impact of First-order Electroweak Phase Transition on QCD Axion

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The QCD axion can account for all dark matter across $f_a\in[10^8,10^{14}]$ GeV, without fine-tuning $\theta_i$, if a first-order electroweak phase transition temporarily boosts its mass.

desk verdict The recurrent misalignment idea is worth taking seriously, but the paper solves a different model from the one it defines: Eq. (1) gives a period-π axion potential, while Eq. (11) uses a period-2π sine, so the relic curves do not support the headline claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05353 v1 pith:Y3QZEAJ6 submitted 2025-07-07 hep-ph

Dipendu Bhandari , Soumen Kumar Manna , Arunansu Sil This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords QCDaxiondarkmattermisalignmentmechanismrecurrentfirst-orderelectroweakphasetransitionsingletscalarPeccei-Quinnsymmetrygravitationalwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's goal is to show that the dark matter window of the QCD axion can be dramatically widened if the electroweak phase transition is first order. The authors introduce a 'recurrent misalignment' mechanism in which a singlet scalar, present to make the transition first order, temporarily raises the axion mass through a non-renormalizable Peccei-Quinn-breaking operator. The axion consequently oscillates early, then stops as the singlet's vev drops, drifts through field space, and starts oscillating again with a shifted field value. The numerical solution of this two-stage evolution gives the observed relic abundance for $f_a\in[10^8,10^{14}]$ GeV with an order-one misalignment angle, instead of the usual $10^{12}$ GeV point or fine-tuned $\theta_i$. If correct, the result would motivate axion searches across a much wider mass range and link axion dark matter to gravitational-wave signals from the same phase transition.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the temporary mass term $$$m_a^{2}$(T)=m_{a0}^2(T)+\frac{$4v_s^{4}$(T)}{\$Lambda^{2}$}\quad (T_n<T\le T_s),$$ with $m_{a0}(T)$ the QCD instanton-generated axion mass and $v_s(T)$ the singlet vev from the high-temperature effective potential. The governing equation is the standard misalignment equation $\ddot\theta+3H\dot\theta+m_a^2(T)\sin\theta=0$, solved piecewise, with $T_s$, $T_c$ and $T_n$ fixed by the two-step singlet-assisted phase transition (benchmark nucleation temperatures are about 43 and 51 GeV). The abrupt disappearance of $v_s$ at $T_n$ is the pivotal event: it ends the early oscillation, leaves the axion with residual kinetic energy and a drifting field value, and thereby sets a new effective initial condition $\theta_i^{II}$ for the second, QCD-driven oscillation. This two-stage oscillation sequence is the mechanism named recurrent misalignment.

What would settle it

Recompute the axion relic density with a realistic nucleation history, including bubble fraction, percolation temperature, and a finite transition duration, replacing the instantaneous global drop of $v_s(T)$ at $T_n$; the mechanism is falsified if no $f_a$ in $[10^8,10^{14}]$ GeV then gives $\Omega_a h^2=0.12$ with $\theta_i\sim 1$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a temporary, transition-induced axion mass can reset the initial condition for the late-time oscillation, so that the QCD axion saturates the dark matter relic for $f_a$ anywhere in $10^8$--$10^{14}$ GeV with $\theta_i\sim\mathcal{O}(1)$. In the mechanism, a $Z_2$-symmetric real singlet $S$ gives the electroweak phase transition a tree-level barrier and makes it first order; while its vev $v_s(T)$ is nonzero between $T_s$ and the nucleation temperature $T_n$, a dimension-six operator $S^4\Phi^2 e^{i\alpha}/\Lambda^2$ contributes $4v_s^4(T)/\Lambda^2$ to the axion mass squared. The axion then begins a first oscillatory phase, stops when $v_s$ drops to zero at $T_n$, and, because it retains kinetic energy, continues moving in field space before the standard QCD mass restarts oscillations with a shifted field value $\theta_i^{II}$ and a non-zero velocity. Choosing $\alpha=\pi$ keeps the CP-conserving minimum at $\theta=0$, and the numerical integration of the axion equation of motion with this mass history yields $\Omega_a h^2=0.12$ for a continuum of $(f_a,\Lambda)$ pairs with $f_a<\Lambda<M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the singlet's vev behaves as a single spatially uniform background that switches off abruptly at the nucleation temperature, although a real first-order transition proceeds through coexisting bubbles and takes finite time.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The QCD axion can be all of the dark matter for $f_a$ between $10^8$ and $10^{14}$ GeV, corresponding to axion masses from tens of neV to tens of meV, with $\theta_i$ of order one and no fine-tuning.
  • Each allowed $f_a$ comes with a specific cutoff scale $\Lambda$ satisfying $f_a<\Lambda<M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$; measuring the axion mass would thus pin down the scale of the PQ-breaking portal.
  • The same first-order transition that drives the mechanism generates a stochastic gravitational-wave background in the mHz-to-Hz band, so the axion dark-matter prediction is tied to a foreground observable by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors.
  • Because $\alpha=\pi$ keeps the minimum CP-conserving, the mechanism does not re-introduce the strong CP problem after $v_s$ relaxes to zero.
  • The widened mass range places relic-satisfying QCD axions within the reach of a broader set of haloscope-style detection schemes than the standard $\sim\mu$eV window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism is not specific to the QCD axion: any axion-like particle with a temporary mass from a first-order transition should experience the same recurrent misalignment.
  • The abrupt global drop of $v_s(T)$ is an idealization; modeling the transition with finite bubble nucleation and percolation could shift the phase drift and should be checked before the full $10^8$--$10^{14}$ GeV range is taken as exact.
  • If a gravitational-wave signal from an electroweak-scale transition and an axion signal were both observed, the required $\Lambda$ for each $f_a$ would provide a quantitative cross-check connecting the two observations.
  • The claimed upper limit $f_a\le 10^{14}$ GeV is set by $\Lambda<M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$; relaxing the cutoff to $\Lambda\sim M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ or changing the transition strength would move this boundary, so the precise endpoint is model-dependent rather than fundamental.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'recurrent misalignment' mechanism for the QCD axion: a first-order electroweak phase transition is induced by a Z2-odd real scalar S, and an explicit PQ-breaking dimension-6 operator S^4 Phi^2 e^{i alpha}/Lambda^2 gives the axion a temporary additional mass while <S> is nonzero. The axion is claimed to undergo an early oscillation phase between T_s and T_n, then to drift in field space when <S> drops to zero, and finally to resume misalignment oscillations under the QCD potential; by choosing Lambda for each f_a, the authors claim Omega_a h^2 = 0.12 can be obtained for f_a in [10^8, 10^14] GeV with O(1) theta_i. The paper also computes the gravitational-wave signal of the FOEWPT for two benchmark points.

Significance. The intended result is significant: it would convert the usual single-scale prediction f_a ~ 10^12 GeV into a broad experimentally accessible window and tie axion DM to electroweak-scale gravitational-wave probes. The paper is clearly written, gives a UV-completion sketch for the dimension-6 operator, specifies two benchmark points for the phase transition, and reports numerical results obtained with standard tools (FindBounce, AxionLimits). The central quantitative claim is, however, compromised by an inconsistency between the Lagrangian operator in Eq. (1) and the equation of motion actually solved in Eq. (11), so the present numerical support does not yet demonstrate the stated model's relic window.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (1) versus Eq. (11)] The equation solved in Eq. (11), theta_ddot + 3H theta_dot + m_a^2(T) sin theta = 0, is the equation of motion for a single period-2pi potential V proportional to (1 - cos theta). Substituting Phi = (f_a/sqrt2) e^{i theta} and alpha = pi into the operator S^4 Phi^2 e^{i alpha}/Lambda^2 + h.c. in Eq. (1) gives V_extra = - (v_s^4 f_a^2 / Lambda^2) cos(2 theta), whose force is (m_as^2/2) sin(2 theta) with m_as^2 = 4 v_s^4 / Lambda^2 as in Eq. (2). This force differs from m_as^2 sin theta by the factor cos theta: it is reduced by about 0.54 at theta = 1 and changes sign for theta > pi/2, where the extra potential has a minimum at theta = pi and repels the field from theta = 0. Since every relic point in Fig. 3 is obtained by integrating Eq. (11), the numerical support for f_a in [10^8, 10^14] GeV does not yet describe the model defined by Eq. (1). The authors should solve the actual potential (QCD potential plus the cos(2 theta + alpha) term) or, alternatively, replace the operator so that the intended period-2pi potential is generated.
  2. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 2: homogeneous abrupt v_s drop] The three-stage mass prescription in Eq. (2) treats v_s(T) as a globally homogeneous background that switches off discontinuously at T_n. A first-order electroweak phase transition proceeds by bubble nucleation, so during the transition the axion field in false-vacuum and true-vacuum regions sees different masses; the duration of the transition and the percolation details determine how much the field drifts before the second oscillation starts at T_osc^II. The claimed relic range is obtained from a single homogeneous theta(t) evolved through this abrupt drop, so the authors should either justify the sudden-global-drop approximation quantitatively or estimate the effect of a finite transition width and mixed phase on Omega_a h^2.
  3. [Fig. 3 and claim of the full f_a range] The text states that 'the entire range f_a as 10^8-14 GeV is allowed', but Fig. 3 shows only a sparse set of colored circles and no table lists the corresponding Lambda, theta_i, and Omega_a h^2 values. Since Lambda is chosen per f_a to satisfy Eq. (14), the claim that the range is covered without fine-tuning theta_i needs at least a statement of the fixed theta_i used in the numerical runs and a denser scan or a continuous Lambda(f_a) curve. Without these, the reader cannot verify either the coverage of the quoted interval or the absence of fine-tuning in theta_i.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B] The effective potential in Eq. (4) omits the Coleman-Weinberg and daisy contributions while retaining only the leading T^2 thermal terms; because T_n and v_s(T) directly set m_as(t) and the duration of stage II, a sensitivity check of the relic window to these corrections would materially strengthen the quantitative claims.
  2. [Figs. 2 and 3] The value of theta_i used for the numerical solutions is not stated; the phrase 'without fine-tuning theta_i' should be quantified (for example, theta_i = 1 fixed, or varied only over an explicitly stated O(1) interval).
  3. [Fig. 4 and Appendix C] The values of alpha_*, beta/H_*, and v_w used for the gravitational-wave spectra of BP1 and BP2 are not reported in the text; reporting these inputs would make the GW curves reproducible.
  4. [Eq. (13)] The number-density conservation step is applied from T_QCD onward, which is the standard approximation, but the text should explicitly note that the sudden switch of m_a(T) to the constant m_a0 at T_QCD in Eq. (2) is the point at which this conservation law is applied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

The derivation is not circular: the f_a range is a parameter-space scan over the free cutoff Λ, and the self-citations to [41] are not load-bearing; a separate sinθ versus sin2θ issue is a correctness concern, not circularity.

full rationale

The central numerical result is obtained by scanning the free cutoff Λ for each f_a until the relic abundance computed from Eqs. (11) and (14) equals Ωh² = 0.12; this is a parameter-space feasibility scan, not a prediction of Ω from fixed inputs, and the existence of a Λ in the interval (f_a, M_Pl) is computed rather than assumed. The only self-citations to the authors' previous work [41] concern the α = π convention and the statement that the H-portal analogue gives a crossover; neither supports the claimed f_a range, which is derived from the equations and benchmark points in the present paper. No uniqueness theorem or external ansatz is imported by self-citation. A separate non-circularity issue is that Eq. (1) with α = π produces a cos(2θ) potential and hence a sin(2θ) force, while Eq. (11) uses sin θ; this is an internal consistency/correctness problem, not an equivalence between the derivation and its inputs, so it is noted here rather than counted as circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central result depends on the existence of a first-order EWPT sector, a new high-dimensional PQ-breaking operator with cutoff Lambda, and the idealization that the S vev turns off abruptly. Lambda is the main fitted dial, f_a is scanned, and theta_i is set to order one.

free parameters (5)
  • Lambda (cutoff of dimension-6 operator) = chosen per f_a to satisfy Omega_a h^2 = 0.12; not fully tabulated
    Central tuning dial. The paper says it studies several f_a values by varying Lambda and shows only selected points in Fig. 3.
  • f_a (QCD axion decay constant) = scanned over 1e8 to 1e14 GeV
    Model input scanned to map the allowed dark matter parameter range, not fitted to a single value.
  • theta_i (initial misalignment angle) = taken O(1), not tuned
    Assumed natural; the no-fine-tuning claim refers to this angle.
  • Scalar sector benchmarks (lambda_s, lambda_hs, mu_s^2) = BP1: 0.03, 0.22, -2240.5 GeV2; BP2: 0.1, 0.37, -4367.5 GeV2
    Chosen to realize a first-order electroweak phase transition and set T_s, T_c, T_n.
  • alpha (phase in the PQ-breaking operator) = pi
    Chosen so the CP-conserving minimum stays at theta = 0 during the period with the S vev.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dilute instanton gas scaling m_a0(T) = m_a0 (T/T_QCD)^(-b) with b = 4.08 above T_QCD
    Used in Eq. 2 to set the QCD axion mass before and after the EWPT; imported from lattice and instanton literature.
  • domain assumption PQ symmetry is broken during inflation, so the axion field is spatially uniform with theta_i O(1) and no strings or walls
    Invoked before Eq. 11; determines the initial condition and the absence of topological defects.
  • domain assumption The effective potential is well described by tree-level terms plus leading T^2 thermal corrections, with no Coleman-Weinberg or daisy terms
    Appendix B explicitly drops those terms; used to compute T_s, T_c, T_n, and v_s(T).
  • domain assumption The S vev switches abruptly from v_s(T) to zero at T_n
    Phase-III and Eq. 2 assume the extra axion mass disappears instantly, ignoring mixed-phase dynamics during bubble nucleation.
  • ad hoc to paper The dimension-6 operator S^4 Phi^2 e^{i alpha} / Lambda^2 is the only relevant PQ-breaking portal and its back-reaction on the Higgs-S potential is negligible
    Eq. 1 is added by hand and Appendix A constructs a UV completion that suppresses other operators; the neglect of back-reaction is not explicitly justified.
invented entities (2)
  • Z2-odd real singlet scalar S
    purpose: Generates a first-order electroweak phase transition through the Higgs portal and carries the temporary axion mass term
    Imported from Ref. [40], not constrained by direct detection in this paper; benchmark values are chosen by hand.
  • Heavy complex SM singlet psi
    purpose: Integrating out psi generates the dimension-6 operator S^4 Phi^2 / Lambda^2 and forbids other U(1)-breaking operators
    Appendix A auxiliary field with mass M_psi = Lambda; no direct observable signature is discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of First-order Electroweak Phase Transition on QCD Axion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y3QZEAJ6

@misc{pith2026250705353,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of First-order Electroweak Phase Transition on QCD Axion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y3QZEAJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05353}
}
abstract

The QCD axion addresses the strong CP problem and dark matter via the misalignment mechanism, typically requiring a decay constant $f_a\sim \mathcal{O}(10^{12}$ GeV), unless the initial misalignment angle ($\theta_i$) is fine-tuned. This work presents a novel approach where the possibility that the QCD axion satisfying the correct relic is extended over a broad range for $f_a\in [10^8, 10^{14}$] GeV without fine-tuning the $\theta_i$, by introducing a new phase of axion oscillation dynamics across the electroweak phase transition (EWPT). This mechanism, we call it {\it{recurrent ~misalignment}}, is a result of a non-renormalizable Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking interaction involving the axion and the sector responsible for making the EWPT of first order. The scenario not only enhances the QCD axion parameter space in terms of its detection possibility, but also provides a unique probe by detectable gravitational waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05353 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Sensitivities of experimental and observational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  2. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977)

    1977

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  4. [4]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  5. [5]

    R. J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, and E. Wit- ten, Chiral Estimate of the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 88, 123 (1979), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 91, 487 (1980)]

    1979

  6. [6]

    Abel et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys

    C. Abel et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020), arXiv:2001.11966 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983)

    1983

  8. [8]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 133 (1983)

    1983

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 137 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    M. S. Turner, Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1243 (1983)

    1983

  3. [11]

    Arias, D

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Re- dondo, and A. Ringwald, WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP 06, 013, arXiv:1201.5902 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds, Lect. Notes Phys. 741, 51 (2008), arXiv:hep-ph/0611350

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Caputo and G

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt, Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition, PoS COSMICWISPers, 041 (2024), arXiv:2401.13728 [hep-ph]. 9

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    R. T. Co, E. Gonzalez, and K. Harigaya, Axion Misalignment Driven to the Bottom, JHEP 05, 162, arXiv:1812.11186 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Heurtier, F

    L. Heurtier, F. Huang, and T. M. P. Tait, Resurrecting low-mass axion dark matter via a dynamical QCD scale, JHEP 12, 216, arXiv:2104.13390 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 251802 (2020), arXiv:1910.14152 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chang and Y

    C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, New Perspectives on Axion Mis- alignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015003 (2020), arXiv:1911.11885 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Axion Kinetic Misalignment and Para- metric Resonance from Inflation, JCAP 08, 036, arXiv:2004.00629 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  11. [19]

    R. T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, Lepto-Axiogenesis, JHEP 03, 017, arXiv:2006.05687 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Er¨ oncel, R

    C. Er¨ oncel, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Sørensen, Model implementations of axion dark matter from kinetic mis- alignment, (2024), arXiv:2408.08355 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, Trapping Effect for QCD Axion Dark Matter, JCAP 05, 062, arXiv:2012.13592 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Di Luzio, B

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald, Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped mis- alignment, JCAP 10, 001, arXiv:2102.01082 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Di Luzio and P

    L. Di Luzio and P. Sørensen, Axion production via trapped misalignment from Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking, JHEP 10, 239, arXiv:2408.04623 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Harigaya and J

    K. Harigaya and J. M. Leedom, QCD Axion Dark Mat- ter from a Late Time Phase Transition, JHEP 06, 034, arXiv:1910.04163 [hep-ph]

    1910 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal, N. Ramberg, and L. Visinelli, QCD Axion Kinetic Misalignment without Prejudice, Universe 8, 634 (2022), arXiv:2111.03677 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Arias, N

    P. Arias, N. Bernal, J. K. Osi´ nski, and L. Roszkowski, Dark matter axions in the early universe with a period of increasing temperature, JCAP 05, 028, arXiv:2207.07677 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Papageorgiou, P

    A. Papageorgiou, P. Qu ´ ılez, and K. Schmitz, Axion dark matter from frictional misalignment, JHEP 01, 169, arXiv:2206.01129 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Xu and S

    L.-X. Xu and S. Yun, Axion free-kick misalign- ment mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 107, L091702 (2023), arXiv:2211.13074 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Choi and E

    G. Choi and E. D. Schiappacasse, PBH assisted search for QCD axion dark matter, JCAP 09, 072, arXiv:2205.02255 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Er¨ oncel, R

    C. Er¨ oncel, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Sørensen, ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window, JCAP 10, 053, arXiv:2206.14259 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    I. J. Allali, M. P. Hertzberg, and Y. Lyu, Altered axion abundance from a dynamical Peccei-Quinn scale, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123517 (2022), arXiv:2203.15817 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cyncynates and J

    D. Cyncynates and J. O. Thompson, Heavy QCD axion dark matter from avoided level crossing, Phys. Rev. D 108, L091703 (2023), arXiv:2306.04678 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Xu, Constraining axion and ALP dark matter from misalignment during reheating, Phys

    Y. Xu, Constraining axion and ALP dark matter from misalignment during reheating, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083536 (2023), arXiv:2308.15322 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Bub- ble misalignment mechanism for axions, JCAP 05, 122, arXiv:2402.09501 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Barman and A

    B. Barman and A. Datta, Testing axionic dark matter during gravitational reheating, Phys. Rev. D109, 095029 (2024), arXiv:2312.13821 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Banerjee and M

    A. Banerjee and M. A. Buen-Abad, Dynamical axion misalignment from the Witten effect, JHEP 02, 078, arXiv:2410.21369 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Er¨ oncel, Y

    C. Er¨ oncel, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, A New Source for (QCD) Axion Dark Matter Production: Curvature-Induced, (2025), arXiv:2503.04880 [hep-ph]

    2025

  30. [38]

    Banerjee, M

    A. Banerjee, M. A. Buen-Abad, and A. Hook, Stacking the Deck: Gambling on a Light QCD Axion, (2025), arXiv:2507.02049 [hep-ph]

    2025

  31. [39]

    Lyu and Y

    K.-F. Lyu and Y. Zhao, QCD Axion Domain Walls from Super-Cooling First Order Phase Transition, (2025), arXiv:2506.19918 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, and F. Riva, Strong Elec- troweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 854, 592 (2012), arXiv:1107.5441 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    S. K. Manna and A. Sil, Effects of electroweak symme- try breaking on axionlike particles as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095036 (2024), arXiv:2311.05125 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 307, 854 (1988)

    1988

  35. [43]

    S. R. Coleman, Why There Is Nothing Rather Than Something: A Theory of the Cosmological Constant, Nucl. Phys. B 310, 643 (1988)

    1988

  36. [44]

    Rey, The Axion Dynamics in Wormhole Back- ground, Phys

    S.-J. Rey, The Axion Dynamics in Wormhole Back- ground, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3185 (1989)

    1989

  37. [45]

    L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, Wormholes and Global Symmetries, Nucl. Phys. B 325, 687 (1989)

    1989

  38. [46]

    E. K. Akhmedov, Z. G. Berezhiani, and G. Senjanovic, Planck scale physics and neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3013 (1992), arXiv:hep-ph/9205230

    1992 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 282, 137 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9202003

    1992 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde, and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 52, 912 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9502069

    1995 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Draper, I

    P. Draper, I. G. Garcia, and M. Reece, Snowmass White Paper: Implications of Quantum Gravity for Parti- cle Physics, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2203.07624 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cordova, K

    C. Cordova, K. Ohmori, and T. Rudelius, Generalized symmetry breaking scales and weak gravity conjectures, JHEP 11, 154, arXiv:2202.05866 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539, 69 (2016), arXiv:1606.07494 [hep-lat]

    S. Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539, 69 (2016), arXiv:1606.07494 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870, 1 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semi- classical Theory, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    1977

  46. [54]

    A. D. Linde, Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temper- ature: Theory and Applications, Phys. Lett. B 100, 37 (1981)

    1981

  47. [55]

    A. D. Linde, Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Tem- 10 perature, Nucl. Phys. B 216, 421 (1983), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 223, 544 (1983)]

    1983

  48. [56]

    Guada, M

    V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek, and M. Pintar, FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107480 (2020), arXiv:2002.00881 [hep- ph]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    O’hare, cajohare/AxionLimits: AxionLimits (2020)

    C. O’hare, cajohare/AxionLimits: AxionLimits (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, and G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely, JHEP 01, 034, arXiv:1511.02867 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong cp problem with a harmless axion, Physics Letters B 104, 199 (1981)

    1981

  52. [60]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)

    1980

  53. [61]

    J. E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP In- variance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979)

    1979

  54. [62]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong In- teractions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166, 493 (1980)

    1980

  55. [63]

    Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and J. Thaler, Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 141801 (2016), arXiv:1602.01086 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    J. L. Ouellet et al., First Results from ABRACADABRA- 10 cm: A Search for Sub- µeV Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 121802 (2019), arXiv:1810.12257 [hep- ex]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Alesini, D

    D. Alesini, D. Babusci, D. Di Gioacchino, C. Gatti, G. Lamanna, and C. Ligi, The KLASH Proposal, (2017), arXiv:1707.06010 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Alesini et al., KLASH Conceptual Design Report, (2019), arXiv:1911.02427 [physics.ins-det]

    D. Alesini et al., KLASH Conceptual Design Report, (2019), arXiv:1911.02427 [physics.ins-det]

    2019 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Alesini et al., The future search for low-frequency ax- ions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity ex- periment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys

    D. Alesini et al., The future search for low-frequency ax- ions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity ex- periment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101370 (2023), arXiv:2309.00351 [physics.ins- det]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    S. Lee, S. Ahn, J. Choi, B. R. Ko, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Axion Dark Matter Search around 6.7 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 101802 (2020), arXiv:2001.05102 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Y. K. Semertzidis et al., Axion Dark Matter Research with IBS/CAPP, (2019), arXiv:1910.11591 [physics.ins- det]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    J. K. Vogel et al., IAXO - The In- ternational Axion Observatory, in 8th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs (2013) arXiv:1302.3273 [physics.ins-det]

    2013 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Armengaud et al

    E. Armengaud et al. (IAXO), Physics potential of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO), JCAP06, 047, arXiv:1904.09155 [hep-ph]

    1904 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Caldwell, G

    A. Caldwell, G. Dvali, B. Majorovits, A. Millar, G. Raf- felt, J. Redondo, O. Reimann, F. Simon, and F. Steffen (MADMAX Working Group), Dielectric Haloscopes: A New Way to Detect Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 091801 (2017), arXiv:1611.05865 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Amaro-Seoane et al

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DE- CIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron- star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044011 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 109901 (2017)], arXiv:1101.3940 [astro- ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Crowder and N

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, Beyond LISA: Explor- ing future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D 72, 083005 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0506015

    2005 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Corbin and N

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang ob- server, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 2435 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0512039

    2006

  69. [77]

    G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney, Laser interferometry for the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 4887 (2006), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 7361 (2006)]

    2006

  70. [78]

    Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO, Class

    S. Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, S125 (2006)

    2006

  71. [79]

    Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    A. Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron. 51, 1333 (2021), arXiv:1908.11391 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribu- tion to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third- generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third- generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  75. [83]

    Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class

    S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Sathyaprakash et al., Scientific Objectives of Ein- stein Telescope, Class

    B. Sathyaprakash et al., Scientific Objectives of Ein- stein Telescope, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 124013 (2012), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)], arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Maggiore et al

    M. Maggiore et al. (ET), Science Case for the Ein- stein Telescope, JCAP 03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro- ph.CO]

    1912 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Garcia-Bellido, H

    J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama, and G. White, Explor- ing the early Universe with Gaia and Theia, JCAP 12 (12), 023, arXiv:2104.04778 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3546 (1993), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 50, 6662 (1994)], arXiv:hep-ph/9212235

    1993 arXiv

  80. [88]

    M. E. Carrington, The Effective potential at finite tem- perature in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2933 (1992)

    1992

  81. [89]

    Quiros, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology (1999) pp

    M. Quiros, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology (1999) pp. 187–259, arXiv:hep-ph/9901312

    1999 arXiv

  82. [90]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973)

    1973

  83. [91]

    Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interfer- ometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interfer- ometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmologi- cal phase transitions, JCAP 04, 001, arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative parti- cle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104094 (2024), arXiv:2305.02357 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie, and G. White, Phase 11 Transitions in an Expanding Universe: Stochastic Gravi- tational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories, JCAP 01, 001, arXiv:2007.08537 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cos- mological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03, 024, arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cos- mological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03, 024, arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    1910 arXiv

  87. [95]

    M. B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma, and M. Pauly, Phase transitions in the early universe, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 24, 1 (2021), arXiv:2008.09136 [astro- ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Grojean and G

    C. Grojean and G. Servant, Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions at the Electroweak Scale and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D 75, 043507 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0607107

    2007 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Vaskonen, Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves from a real scalar singlet, Phys

    V. Vaskonen, Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves from a real scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 95, 123515 (2017), arXiv:1611.02073 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No, and G. Ser- vant, Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06, 028, arXiv:1004.4187 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  91. [99]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 92, 123009 (2015), arXiv:1504.03291 [astro- ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.