Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 80 references

PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read PRATUSH, a proposed lunar-orbiter radiometer, would have the sensitivity to detect the global 21-cm Cosmic Dawn signal, recovering ~180 mK signals predicted by standard models.

desk verdict A well-argued lunar-orbiter 21-cm mission concept whose headline sensitivity claim rests on an unvalidated in-situ VNA correction; the paper deserves serious refereeing but the detection claim is conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05654 v1 pith:C7VBDOEP submitted 2025-07-08 astro-ph.IM

Mayuri Sathyanarayana Rao , Saurabh Singh , Srivani K S , Girish B S , Keerthipriya Satish , Somashekar R , Raghunathan Agaram , Kavitha Kalyanasundaram
show 4 more authors
Gautam Vishwapriya Ashish Anand Udaya Shankar N Seetha S
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords global21-cmsignalCosmicDawnEpochofReionizationlunarfarsideradioastronomyMaximallySmoothfunctionsspectralradiometerantennareturn-losscalibrationquietzone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

PRATUSH is a proposed lunar-orbiter experiment whose primary goal is the first high-confidence detection of the global redshifted 21-cm signal from the Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization, the spectral imprint left on neutral hydrogen by the first stars and galaxies. The paper argues that observing in the radio-quiet shadow of the lunar farside removes the systematics, such as terrestrial radio interference, the ionosphere, and ground coupling, that have so far confounded ground-based detection attempts. The central claim is a sensitivity result: with about 200 hours of shielded observing time over a two-year mission in the 55-110 MHz band, the simulated instrument recovers a fiducial Cosmic Dawn signal of roughly $-180$ mK amplitude with unbiased parameter estimates, against foregrounds that are orders of magnitude brighter. The design achieves this by requiring every subsystem to be spectrally smooth, so that the bandpass-calibrated spectrum is describable by a Maximally Smooth function with residual root-mean-square at or below the millikelvin level, and by correcting the antenna return loss in situ with a purpose-built vector network analyzer. If the sensitivity claim holds, PRATUSH would provide cosmology's first space-based measurement of the epoch of first light, complementary to ground experiments that are already approaching detection claims.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Maximally Smooth (MS) function, defined as a fitted baseline spectrum free of inflections or turning points. It serves double duty: as the qualification metric for the instrument, requiring that the time-averaged, bandpass-calibrated receiver spectrum acquired with open, short, and 50-ohm terminations leave an MS residual with root-mean-square at or below about a millikelvin, and as the foreground model in analysis, because physical foregrounds are expected to be smooth while the 21-cm signal carries multiple turning points that MS functions minimally absorb. The sensitivity claim is carried by three engineered pillars: the six-state calibration cycle whose double-differencing removes the low-noise amplifier and digital-circuit noise, the in-situ one-port VNA whose return-loss correction takes the validation residual from 7.1 mK, where signal-present and signal-absent cases are indistinguishable, down to a level where the two separate cleanly, and the antenna validation pipeline that qualifies any candidate antenna by simulating the sky spectrum it would observe and requiring the MS residual to discriminate signal from null. Around these sit design rules that keep structure out of the band: sub-decimetre cable runs that push standing-wave periods far beyond the signal's $\sim$10 MHz turning-point spacing, and multi-layer EMI shielding of all spacecraft and payload electronics.

What would settle it

Build the concept-model receiver, terminate it with precision open, short, and 50-ohm loads, run the six-state calibration cycle, and fit a Maximally Smooth function to the calibrated spectrum: if the residual root-mean-square exceeds about one millikelvin, or if the same test under thermal cycling shows the VNA-corrected return-loss residual cannot reach that level, the claimed two-year, 200-hour sensitivity to a roughly $-180$ mK signal would not be achieved. The paper's Figure 7 provides the benchmark: without return-loss correction the residual is 7.1 mK and the signal is undetectable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that a purpose-built lunar-farside radiometer can detect the global 21-cm signal, and that the route to detection is spectral smoothness engineered to the millikelvin level rather than raw sensitivity alone. On the paper's own terms, the baseline PRATUSH design, a monocone antenna with a shaped log-spiral reflector on a dedicated spacecraft bus, paired with a six-state Dicke-switched bandpass calibration receiver and a custom one-port vector network analyzer for in-situ return-loss measurement, would have the sensitivity required to detect the Cosmic Dawn signal predicted by the standard models with varying degrees of confidence. The supporting simulation takes the GMOSS foreground sky model, convolves it with the simulated antenna beam, adds thermal noise corresponding to 200 hours of prime-cone observing, and injects a fiducial signal modeled as a Gaussian of amplitude $-180$ mK centered at 78 MHz with 23.5 MHz full width at half maximum; fitting the mock spectrum with a Maximally Smooth foreground plus a three-parameter Gaussian recovers unbiased estimates of the signal parameters. The paper states that this sensitivity enables extraction of the 21-cm signal from the foregrounds with high fidelity, so the design allows an unbiased estimate of the signal parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The sensitivity claim rests on the assumption that the time-averaged, bandpass-calibrated receiver spectrum is describable by a Maximally Smooth function with residual root-mean-square at or below about a millikelvin, and that the in-situ VNA return-loss correction reaches the same level; this is a design target not yet shown in hardware, since the concept model is still under development and the VNA implementation and validation are deferred to a future paper, with the paper itself acknowledging unknown-unknowns in Section 11.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A successful PRATUSH mission would produce the first space-based detection of the global Cosmic Dawn signal, free of the ionosphere, ground coupling, and terrestrial FM-band interference that have complicated every ground experiment to date.
  • The in-situ return-loss correction would be established as a required component of lunar-farside global 21-cm experiments; without it, the paper's own validation shows a 7.1 mK residual that cannot distinguish signal from no-signal.
  • The mission would deliver an absolute calibration of the low-frequency radio sky over 40-200 MHz, improving sky models whose present errors of order 1-10 percent limit global 21-cm and future SKA-era analyses.
  • PRATUSH data would characterise the actual radio-quietness of the lunar farside, including radio interference from other orbiting spacecraft, informing international efforts to protect the farside as a quiet zone.
  • A signal detected independently from the ground and from space would be the strongest available evidence that a claimed global 21-cm detection is genuinely cosmological.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The millikelvin MS-residual criterion is effectively a pre-flight acceptance test: any receiver or antenna that fails it under thermal-vacuum testing would force either a design change or a reduced detection claim, so the paper's own metric defines how the mission would eventually be validated.
  • Because the detection hinges on the in-situ VNA correction, the sensitivity claim is conditional on the stability of antenna impedance under lunar thermal cycling and plasma immersion; a small degradation of return-loss knowledge would directly erode the claimed detection confidence.
  • The same smoothness-diagnosed validation pipeline could be applied to lunar lander concepts such as LuSEE-Night, with the added complication that a lander's coupling to the lunar surface would need to be modeled as an extra systematic term.
  • A natural next step beyond the single fiducial Gaussian is to run the sensitivity pipeline over the full atlas of standard-model signals shown in the paper's Figure 1, producing a map of detection confidence across astrophysical parameter space.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the PRATUSH mission concept, a proposed lunar-orbiter experiment to detect the global redshifted 21-cm signal from Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionization. It describes the design principles (smooth bandpass, short cable lengths, multi-level EMI shielding), the baseline antenna and receiver architecture, the digital spectrometer, operations in the lunar farside prime cone, and a sensitivity study. The central claim is that with 200 hours of prime-cone observing over a two-year mission, PRATUSH would detect the standard-model CD signal with varying degrees of confidence; the supporting simulation injects a fiducial Gaussian signal with amplitude -180 mK centered at 78 MHz into GMOSS foregrounds convolved with the antenna beam and thermal noise, fits Maximally Smooth functions, and uses PolyChord to recover the injected parameters. The paper is explicitly a pre-project design overview, with a concept model under development and several system-level requirements presented as targets rather than demonstrated hardware performance.

Significance. If the sensitivity claim holds, PRATUSH would be an important step toward a lunar farside global 21-cm detection, complementing ground-based experiments such as SARAS and EDGES and providing a clean absolute calibration of the low-frequency sky. The paper's strengths are its detailed system design, the explicit antenna validation pipeline, and an injection-recovery demonstration built on established tools (GMOSS foregrounds, MS-function fitting, PolyChord nested sampling). These elements are appropriate for a mission concept study. However, the sensitivity estimate is an idealized self-consistency check: it assumes perfect antenna return-loss correction, a thermal-noise-limited receiver with millikelvin-level smoothness, and it omits known lunar-reflected emission. The paper itself acknowledges the concept model is under development and that unknown-unknowns remain, so the detection claim is better framed as a design requirement than as a projected observational result.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 7, Figs. 14-16] The sensitivity claim is demonstrated for only one injected signal: a Gaussian with amplitude -180 mK, center 78 MHz, and FWHM 23.5 MHz. The abstract and Section 7 state that PRATUSH would detect 'the CD signal predicted by the standard models with varying degrees of confidence,' but the atlas of standard-model signals shown in Figure 1 is not tested. To support the stated claim, the simulation should be run on a representative set of atlas models, or the claim should be explicitly restricted to the fiducial Gaussian model.
  2. [Section 7, Fig. 7, Section 5.2.2] The detection demonstration assumes perfect correction of the antenna return loss, and that correction relies entirely on the custom one-port VNA described in Section 5.2.2. The paper states that VNA implementation and validation details will be presented in a future paper, and no error budget or measured performance for the VNA is given. The left panel of Figure 7 shows that without return-loss correction the MS-fit residual RMS is 7.1 mK and the null and signal-present cases are indistinguishable. Because the central sensitivity claim is load-bearing on this unvalidated subsystem, the paper should either include an error budget for the VNA correction or explicitly state that the simulated sensitivity assumes perfect in-situ calibration.
  3. [Section 7 vs. Sections 5.1.1 and 9.5] The mock-data construction in Section 7 uses only GMOSS foregrounds convolved with the antenna primary beam plus thermal noise. It does not include lunar thermal emission or galactic emission reflected off the lunar regolith, although Section 5.1.1 lists lunar emission as an input to the design-validation pipeline and Section 9.5 identifies reflected galactic emission as a frequency-dependent effect that could contaminate the spectrum. The sensitivity simulation therefore omits a known systematic of the lunar-orbiter environment; the paper should quantify or bound the effect of lunar reflected emission on the MS-fit residuals or clearly state the assumption that it is negligible.
  4. [Section 4, Section 8] The receiver bandpass requirement that the calibrated spectrum be described by an MS function with residual RMS at or below the millikelvin level is a design target, not a demonstrated capability. The concept model is under development (Section 8), and Section 11 acknowledges 'unknown-unknowns.' The sensitivity simulation in Section 7 assumes thermal-noise-limited data and systematics-free smoothness, so the stated detection confidence is an idealized projection. The paper should present the sensitivity estimate as an upper-bound capability under ideal assumptions rather than as a predicted mission outcome.
  5. [Section 5] The text states that 'with a conservative estimate of 15% of the total observing time being scientifically useful... we estimate requiring a total of 200 hours in the prime-cone region over a mission life of 2 Earth years.' A two-year mission contains about 17,520 hours, so 15% corresponds to roughly 2,600 hours, not 200 hours. The derivation of the 200-hour figure and the definition of 'scientifically useful' time should be clarified, because the expected thermal noise, and hence the sensitivity claim, scales directly with the assumed observing time.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The calibration expression in Equation (4) would be easier to interpret if the states CAL00, CAL01, CAL10, and CAL11 were defined explicitly in terms of the noise-source ON/OFF and phase-switch positions; the current table is helpful but the equation itself is not self-contained.
  2. [Section 5.1] The sentence 'for a smooth return loss over 55-100 MHz as shown in Figure 5.1' appears to contain a formatting error; the reference should be to Figure 5(a) or to a correctly numbered figure.
  3. [Section 11] The phrase 'unknown-unknowns that cannot be modeled and hence accounted for' is useful as a caveat, but it is stated without connection to any specific subsystem; a short itemization of the main unmodeled effects would make the limitation more concrete.
  4. [Section 5.3, Table 3] The digital receiver specifications list a spectral resolution of 244 kHz following a 2048-point FFT at 250 MSps; the relationship between the sampling rate, FFT length, and windowing should be stated explicitly so that the resolution value is reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain: Section 7 is a transparent mock-injection recovery test; same-team citations (MS functions, GMOSS, SARAS) are independent prior work, and the paper's stated hardware limitations are readiness risks, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central sensitivity claim in Section 7 is a standard injection–recovery closure test, not a fitted-input prediction. The authors explicitly simulate mock spectra from GMOSS foregrounds, the PRATUSH beam, and thermal noise, then add a Gaussian 'fiducial 21-cm signal' and recover it with Equation 5, which contains the same Gaussian parameterization. This makes the recovery self-consistent, but the paper is transparent about the injection; the exercise validates the analysis pipeline and noise budget rather than deriving the signal from the instrument by construction. The same-team citations to Maximally Smooth functions [61], GMOSS [57], and SARAS [38, 69] provide the foreground model and smoothness metric, but these are externally published and independently testable; the PRATUSH-specific computations (antenna qualification pipeline, 200-hour sensitivity, VNA-correction necessity in Figure 7) are carried out in this paper. Section 5.2.2 explicitly defers VNA validation to a future paper, and Section 11 concedes 'unknown-unknowns that cannot be modeled and hence accounted for'; these are unvalidated-hardware and systematic-error risks, not circular reasoning. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own input by definition, and no central claim is forced by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central sensitivity claim depends on a set of assumed parameters and domain assumptions rather than new physics. The main free parameters are the observing-time assumptions and the fiducial signal shape; the axioms are the standard cosmological picture, the GMOSS foreground model, MS-function separability, lunar farside RFI attenuation, and the fidelity of antenna EM simulations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Usable prime-cone observation time = 200 hours
    Assumed in Section 7 based on 15% of a 2-year mission; drives the thermal noise r.m.s. and hence the detection claim.
  • Fiducial 21-cm signal parameters = A=-180 mK, nu0=78 MHz, FWHM=23.5 MHz
    Chosen in Section 7 to represent a standard-model CD signal; the recovery of this injected signal is used to demonstrate sensitivity.
  • Scientifically useful observing fraction = 15%
    Assumed in Section 5 to convert orbit time into science time; affects total observation time and sensitivity.
  • Receiver bandpass residual RMS target = ~mK
    Design requirement in Section 4 that the calibrated receiver response be MS-smooth with residual nearly Gaussian, RMS about a millikelvin or below; not yet demonstrated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard LCDM cosmology and the global 21-cm signal models of Cohen et al. (2017) represent plausible CD/EoR signals.
    Section 3.1 and Figure 1 use this atlas to define the signal the experiment targets.
  • domain assumption GMOSS all-sky model accurately represents low-frequency foregrounds.
    Section 5.1.1 uses GMOSS as the physically motivated sky model for the antenna validation pipeline; GMOSS is from prior work by the same team (Sathyanarayana Rao et al. 2017).
  • domain assumption Maximally Smooth functions can describe foregrounds without absorbing the CD signal.
    Sections 4 and 5.1.1 rely on MS-function fitting to separate foregrounds from signal; this is from prior work by the same team (Sathyanarayana Rao et al. 2015, 2017).
  • domain assumption The lunar farside attenuates terrestrial RFI sufficiently over 40-200 MHz.
    Section 2 cites RAE-2 measurements (25 kHz-13 MHz) and simulations to justify the farside site; the shielding is not directly measured over the full CD/EoR band.
  • domain assumption Electromagnetic simulations of the monocone antenna over the bus accurately predict beam and return loss.
    Section 5.1 qualifies the baseline antenna on simulated beam and S11 without mention of measured prototype verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7VBDOEP

@misc{pith2026250705654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7VBDOEP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05654}
}
read the original abstract

PRATUSH -- Probing ReionizATion of the Universe using Signal from Hydrogen -- is a proposed cosmology experiment to detect the global red-shifted 21-cm signal from the Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization (CD/EoR). PRATUSH orbiting the Moon will seek to precisely measure the low-frequency radio sky-spectrum over 40 to 200 MHz. The scientific observations would be made in the radio-quiet region when in the farside of the Moon, and the data would be transmitted back to Earth when in the near-side. PRATUSH was proposed to the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) during a call for proposals in the announcement of opportunity for science payloads in 2018. PRATUSH is in the pre-project studies phase. Here we present a mission concept and baseline design of the proposed payload optimized to operate over the Cosmic Dawn signal band of 55 - 110 MHz. Starting with a description of the fundamental design principles followed, we discuss the PRATUSH baseline design and sensitivity. We further enumerate the challenges that are common to most PRATUSH like experiments, which have been proposed to seek a detection of the CD/EoR signal in orbit in the lunar farside. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the measurement, PRATUSH is designed to operate as a solo experiment with a dedicated spacecraft. Our simulations, assuming a mission lifetime of two years, estimate that PRATUSH would have the sensitivity required to detect the CD signal predicted by the standard models with varying degrees of confidence.A concept model of PRATUSH is under development, which is expected to lead to the engineering model followed by flight model subject to mission approval.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Soviet Astronomy Letters3, 155 (1977)

    Varshalovich, D.A., Khersonskii, V .K.: Distortion of the primordial radiation spectrum by the 21-cm hydrogen line at epochs z=150-15. Soviet Astronomy Letters3, 155 (1977)

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    `First Light' in the Universe; What Ended the "Dark Age"?

    Rees, M.J.: ‘First light’ in the universe: what ended the ‘dark age’? Physics Reports333, 203–214 (2000) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9912345 [astro-ph]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00023-5

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Physical Review D82(2), 023006 (2010) https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4057

    Pritchard, J.R., Loeb, A.: Constraining the unexplored period between the dark ages and reionization with observations of the global 21 cm signal. Physical Review D82(2), 023006 (2010) https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4057. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023006

    arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Physics Reports433, 181– 301 (2006) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608032

    Furlanetto, S.R., Oh, S.P., Briggs, F.H.: Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe. Physics Reports433, 181– 301 (2006) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physrep.2006.08.002

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal142, 1633–1641 (1965)

    Gunn, J.E., Peterson, B.A.: On the Density of Neutral Hydrogen in Intergalactic Space. The Astrophysical Journal142, 1633–1641 (1965). https://doi.org/10. 1086/148444

    work page 1965

  6. [6]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics44, 415–462 (2006) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602375

    Fan, X., Carilli, C.L., Keating, B.: Observational Constraints on Cosmic Reionization. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics44, 415–462 (2006) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. astro.44.051905.092514

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Reports on Progress in Physics75(8), 086901 (2012) https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6012

    Pritchard, J.R., Loeb, A.: 21 cm cosmology in the 21st century. Reports on Progress in Physics75(8), 086901 (2012) https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901

    arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society188, 791–798 (1979)

    Hogan, C.J., Rees, M.J.: Spectral appearance of non-uniform gas at high z. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society188, 791–798 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/188.4.791

    doi:10.1093/mnras/188.4.791 1979

Show all 80 references
  1. [10]

    Physical Review D78(10), 103511 (2008) https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2102

    Pritchard, J.R., Loeb, A.: Evolution of the 21cm signal throughout cosmic his- tory. Physical Review D78(10), 103511 (2008) https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.103511

    2008 arXiv

  2. [11]

    The First Galaxies396, 45 (2013)

    Zaroubi, S.: The Epoch of Reionization. The First Galaxies396, 45 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1 2

    2013 doi

  3. [12]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety472(2), 1915–1931 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02312 [astro-ph.CO]

    Cohen, A., Fialkov, A., Barkana, R., Lotem, M.: Charting the parameter space of the global 21-cm signal. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety472(2), 1915–1931 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02312 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2065

    2017 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2), 2923–2936 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/508/2/ 2923/40634384/stab2737.pdf

    Bevins, H.T.J., Handley, W.J., Fialkov, A., de Lera Acedo, E., Javid, K.: globalemu: a novel and robust approach for emulating the sky- averaged 21-cm signal from the cosmic dawn and epoch of reionization. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2), 2923–2936 (202...

    2021 doi

  5. [14]

    Experimental Astronomy45(2), 269–314 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.01101 [astro-ph.IM]

    Singh, S., Subrahmanyan, R., Shankar, N.U., Rao, M.S., Girish, B.S., Raghu- nathan, A., Somashekar, R., Srivani, K.S.: SARAS 2: a spectral radiometer for probing cosmic dawn and the epoch of reionization through detec- tion of the global 21-cm signal. Experimental Astronomy45(...

    2018 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Nature 555(7694), 67–70 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05912 [astro-ph.CO]

    Bowman, J.D., Rogers, A.E.E., Monsalve, R.A., Mozdzen, T.J., Mahesh, N.: An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum. Nature 555(7694), 67–70 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05912 [astro-ph.CO]. https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature25792

    2018 arXiv

  7. [16]

    The Astrophysical Journal883(2), 126 (2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04917 [astro-ph.IM]

    Nhan, B.D., Bordenave, D.D., Bradley, R.F., Burns, J.O., Tauscher, K., Rapetti, D., Klima, P.J.: Assessment of the Projection-induced Polarimetry Technique for Constraining the Foreground Spectrum in Global 21 cm Cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal883(2), 126 (2019) https://a...

    2019 arXiv

  8. [17]

    In: 2019 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), pp

    de Lera Acedo, E.: Reach: Radio experiment for the analysis of cosmic hydrogen. In: 2019 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), pp. 0626–0629 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  9. [18]

    Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union12(S333), 98–101 (2017) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview35

    Bernardi, G.: Measurements of the global 21-cm signal from the cosmic dawn. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union12(S333), 98–101 (2017) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview35

    2017

  10. [20]

    Nature555(7694), 71–74 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1803.06698 [astro-ph.CO]

    Barkana, R.: Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars. Nature555(7694), 71–74 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1803.06698 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25791

    2018 arXiv

  11. [21]

    Physical review letters121(1), 011101 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.10577 [astro-ph.CO]

    Fialkov, A., Barkana, R., Cohen, A.: Constraining Baryon-Dark-Matter Scat- tering with the Cosmic Dawn 21-cm Signal. Physical review letters121(1), 011101 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.10577 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.011101

    2018 arXiv

  12. [22]

    Nature557(7707), 684–686 (2018)

    Mu ˜noz, J.B., Loeb, A.: A small amount of mini-charged dark matter could cool the baryons in the early Universe. Nature557(7707), 684–686 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0151-x

    2018 doi

  13. [23]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society486(2), 1763–1773 (2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02438 [astro-ph.CO]

    Fialkov, A., Barkana, R.: Signature of excess radio background in the 21-cm global signal and power spectrum. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society486(2), 1763–1773 (2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02438 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz873

    2019 arXiv

  14. [24]

    The Astrophysical Journal 868(1), 63 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01815 [astro-ph.CO]

    Ewall-Wice, A., Chang, T.-C., Lazio, J., Dor´e, O., Seiffert, M., Monsalve, R.A.: Modeling the Radio Background from the First Black Holes at Cosmic Dawn: Implications for the 21 cm Absorption Amplitude. The Astrophysical Journal 868(1), 63 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01...

    2018 arXiv

  15. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal858(2), 17 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07432 [astro-ph.CO]

    Feng, C., Holder, G.: Enhanced Global Signal of Neutral Hydrogen Due to Excess Radiation at Cosmic Dawn. The Astrophysical Journal858(2), 17 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07432 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aac0fe

    2018 arXiv

  16. [26]

    The Astrophysical Journal897(2), 132 (2020)

    Tauscher, K., Rapetti, D., Burns, J.O.: Formulating and critically examining the assumptions of global 21 cm signal analyses: How to avoid the false troughs that can appear in single-spectrum fits. The Astrophysical Journal897(2), 132 (2020)

    2020

  17. [27]

    Nature (7736), 32–34 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1805.01421 [astro-ph.CO]

    Hills, R., Kulkarni, G., Meerburg, P.D., Puchwein, E.: Concerns about mod- elling of the EDGES data. Nature (7736), 32–34 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1805.01421 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0796-5

    2018 arXiv

  18. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal880(1), 26 (2019) https://arxiv.org/ Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 36PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview abs/1903.04540 [astro-ph.CO]

    Singh, S., Subrahmanyan, R.: The Redshifted 21 cm Signal in the EDGES Low- band Spectrum. The Astrophysical Journal880(1), 26 (2019) https://arxiv.org/ Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 36PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview abs/1903.04540 [astro-ph.CO]. https://do...

    2019 arXiv

  19. [29]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society492(1), 22–38 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03165 [astro-ph.CO]

    Sims, P.H., Pober, J.C.: Testing for calibration systematics in the EDGES low-band data using Bayesian model selection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society492(1), 22–38 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03165 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3388

    2020 arXiv

  20. [30]

    The Astrophysi- cal Journal874(2), 153 (2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09015 [astro-ph.IM]

    Bradley, R.F., Tauscher, K., Rapetti, D., Burns, J.O.: A Ground Plane Arti- fact that Induces an Absorption Profile in Averaged Spectra from Global 21 cm Measurements, with Possible Application to EDGES. The Astrophysi- cal Journal874(2), 153 (2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1810....

    2019 arXiv

  21. [31]

    Nature Astronomy, 1–11 (2022)

    Singh, S., Nambissan, T., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Girish, B., Raghunathan, A., Somashekar, R., Srivani, K., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., et al.: On the detection of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background. Nature Astronomy, 1–11 (2022)

    2022

  22. [32]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society437(2), 1056–1069 (2014)

    Vedantham, H., Koopmans, L., de Bruyn, A., Wijnholds, S., Ciardi, B., Brent- jens, M.: Chromatic effects in the 21 cm global signal from the cosmic dawn. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society437(2), 1056–1069 (2014)

    2014

  23. [33]

    Tingay, S.J., Kaplan, D.L., McKinley, B., Briggs, F., Wayth, R.B., Hurley- Walker, N., Kennewell, J., Smith, C., Zhang, K., Arcus, W.,et al.: On the detection and tracking of space debris using the murchison widefield array. i. simulations and test observations demonstrate fea...

    2013

  24. [34]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society503(1), 344–353 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10517 [astro-ph.IM]

    Shen, E., Anstey, D., de Lera Acedo, E., Fialkov, A., Handley, W.: Quantifying ionospheric effects on global 21-cm observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society503(1), 344–353 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10517 [astro-ph.IM]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnra...

    2021 arXiv

  25. [35]

    The Astrophysical Journal 831(1), 6 (2016)

    Datta, A., Bradley, R., Burns, J.O., Harker, G., Komjathy, A., Lazio, T.J.W.: The Effects of the Ionosphere on Ground-based Detection of the Global 21 cm Signal from the Cosmic Dawn and the Dark Ages. The Astrophysical Journal 831(1), 6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637...

    2016 doi

  26. [36]

    The Astrophysical Journal813(1), 18 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1509.06125 [astro-ph.IM]

    Sokolowski, M., Wayth, R.B., Tremblay, S.E., Tingay, S.J., Waterson, M., Tick- ner, J., Emrich, D., Schlagenhaufer, F., Kenney, D., Padhi, S.: The Impact of the Ionosphere on Ground-based Detection of the Global Epoch of Reioniza- tion Signal. The Astrophysical Journal813(1), ...

    2015 arXiv

  27. [37]

    arXiv e-prints, 2106–02153 (2021) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview37 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02153 [astro-ph.CO]

    Bassett, N., Rapetti, D., Tauscher, K., Nhan, B.D., Bordenave, D.D., Hibbard, J.J., Burns, J.O.: Lost Horizon: Quantifying the Effect of Local Topography on Global 21-cm Cosmology Data Analysis. arXiv e-prints, 2106–02153 (2021) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template PRATUSH expe...

    2021 arXiv

  28. [38]

    Experimental Astronomy51(2), 193–234 (2021)

    Nambissan T., J., Subrahmanyan, R., Somashekar, R., Shankar, N.U., Singh, S., Raghunathan, A., Girish, B.S., Srivani, K.S., Rao, M.S.: Saras 3 cd/eor radiome- ter: design and performance of the receiver. Experimental Astronomy51(2), 193–234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s106...

    2021 doi

  29. [39]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics40, 365–371 (1975)

    Alexander, J.K., Kaiser, M.L., Novaco, J., Grena, F., Weber, R.: Scientific instrumentation of the radio-astronomy-explorer-2 satellite. Astronomy and Astrophysics40, 365–371 (1975)

    1975

  30. [40]

    Advances in Space Research66(6), 1265–1275 (2020) https:// arxiv.org/abs/2003.03468 [astro-ph.IM]

    Bassett, N., Rapetti, D., Burns, J.O., Tauscher, K., MacDowall, R.: Character- izing the radio quiet region behind the lunar farside for low radio frequency experiments. Advances in Space Research66(6), 1265–1275 (2020) https:// arxiv.org/abs/2003.03468 [astro-ph.IM]. https://...

    2020 arXiv

  31. [41]

    The Astrophysical Journal844(1), 33 (2017)

    Burns, J.O., Bradley, R., Tauscher, K., Furlanetto, S., Mirocha, J., Monsalve, R., Rapetti, D., Purcell, W., Newell, D., Draper, D.,et al.: A space-based observa- tional strategy for characterizing the first stars and galaxies using the redshifted 21 cm global spectrum. The As...

    2017

  32. [42]

    In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts# 234, vol

    Burns, J.O., Bale, S., Bradley, R.F.: Dark cosmology: Investigating dark matter and exotic physics using the redshifted 21-cm global signal with the dark ages polarimeter pathfinder (dapper). In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts# 234, vol. 234, pp. 212–02 (2019)

    2019

  33. [43]

    In: Lunar Surface Science Workshop, vol

    Bale, S.D., Bonnell, J.W., Burns, J., Goetz, K., Halekas, J.S., Malaspina, D.M., Page, B., Pulupa, M., Poppe, A.R., MacDowall, R.J., Maksimovic, M., Zaslavsky, A.: The Lunar Surface Electromagnetics Experiment (LuSEE). In: Lunar Surface Science Workshop, vol. 2241, p. 5001 (2020)

    2020

  34. [44]

    The Planetary Science Journal2(2), 44 (2021)

    Burns, J.O., MacDowall, R., Bale, S., Hallinan, G., Bassett, N., Hegedus, A.: Low radio frequency observations from the moon enabled by nasa landed payload missions. The Planetary Science Journal2(2), 44 (2021)

    2021

  35. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05407 (2019)

    Burns, J., Hallinan, G., Lux, J., Romero-Wolf, A., Chang, T.-C., Kocz, J., Bowman, J., MacDowall, R., Kasper, J., Bradley, R., et al.: Farside: a low radio frequency interferometric array on the lunar farside. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05407 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  36. [46]

    In: 43rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly

    Vecchio, A., Bentum, M., Falcke, H., Boonstra, A.-J., Ping, J., Chen, L., Klein-Wolt, M., Brinkerink, C., Rotteveel, J., Pourshaghaghi, H., Karapakula, S., Ruiter, M., Bertels, E.: The Netherlands-China Low-frequency explorer (NCLE). In: 43rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 2...

    2021

  37. [47]

    Shaver, P.A., Windhorst, R.A., Madau, P., de Bruyn, A.G.: Can the reionization epoch be detected as a global signature in the cosmic background? Astronomy and Astrophysics345, 380–390 (1999) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9901320 [astro-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  38. [48]

    Astronomical Journal57, 31–32 (1952)

    Wouthuysen, S.A.: On the excitation mechanism of the 21-cm (radio-frequency) interstellar hydrogen emission line. Astronomical Journal57, 31–32 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1086/106661

    1952 doi

  39. [49]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506(4), 5479–5493 (2021)

    Reis, I., Fialkov, A., Barkana, R.: The subtlety of lyαphotons: changing the expected range of the 21-cm signal. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506(4), 5479–5493 (2021)

    2021

  40. [50]

    The Astrophysical Journal801(2), 138 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Patra, N., Subrahmanyan, R., Sethi, S., Udaya Shankar, N., Raghunathan, A.: Saras Measurement of the Radio Background At Long Wavelengths. The Astrophysical Journal801(2), 138 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7762 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/138

    2015 arXiv

  41. [51]

    The Astrophysical Journal 908(2), 145 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11019 [astro-ph.GA]

    Monsalve, R.A., Rogers, A.E.E., Bowman, J.D., Mahesh, N., Murray, S.G., Mozdzen, T.J., Johnson, L., Barrett, J., Samson, T., Lewis, D.: Absolute Cali- bration of Diffuse Radio Surveys at 45 and 150 MHz. The Astrophysical Journal 908(2), 145 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11...

    2021 arXiv

  42. [52]

    The Astronomical Journal136(2), 641 (2008)

    Rogers, A.E., Bowman, J.D.: Spectral index of the diffuse radio background measured from 100 to 200 mhz. The Astronomical Journal136(2), 641 (2008)

    2008

  43. [53]

    In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts# 233, vol

    Mozdzen, T.J., Mahesh, N., Monsalve, R.A., Bowman, J.,et al.: Spectral index of the diffuse radio sky as measured by edges using the lowband (50-100 mhz) antenna. In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts# 233, vol. 233, pp. 334–05 (2019)

    2019

  44. [54]

    Australian Journal of Physics Astrophysical Supplement 16, 1 (1970)

    Landecker, T.L., Wielebinski, R.: The galactic metre wave radiation: A two- frequency survey between declinations+25o and-25o and the preparation of a map of the whole sky. Australian Journal of Physics Astrophysical Supplement 16, 1 (1970)

    1970

  45. [55]

    ii-the atlas of contour maps

    Haslam, C., Salter, C., Stoffel, H., Wilson, W.: A 408 mhz all-sky continuum survey. ii-the atlas of contour maps. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series47, 1 (1982)

    1982

  46. [56]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society388(1), 247–260 (2008)

    de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Gaensler, B., Jonas, J., Landecker, T., Reich, P.: A model of diffuse galactic radio emission from 10 mhz to 100 ghz. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society388(1), 247–260 (2008)

    2008

  47. [57]

    The Astronomical Journal153(1), 26 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07453 [astro-ph.CO]

    Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Chluba, J.: Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview39 GMOSS: All-sky Model of Spectral Radio Brightness Based on Physical Com- ponents and Associated Radiative Processes. Th...

    2017 arXiv

  48. [58]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety424, 2551–2561 (2012) https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2378

    Morandi, A., Barkana, R.: Studying cosmic reionization with observations of the global 21-cm signal. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety424, 2551–2561 (2012) https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2378. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21240.x

    2012 arXiv

  49. [59]

    Mirocha, J., Harker, G.J.A., Burns, J.O.: Interpreting the Global 21 cm Sig- nal from High Redshifts. I. Model-independent constraints. The Astrophysical Journal777, 118 (2013) https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.2296 [astro-ph.CO]. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/118

    2013 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Nature506, 197–199 (2014) https: //arxiv.org/abs/1402.0940 [astro-ph.CO]

    Fialkov, A., Barkana, R., Visbal, E.: The observable signature of late heating of the Universe during cosmic reionization. Nature506, 197–199 (2014) https: //arxiv.org/abs/1402.0940 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12999

    2014 arXiv

  51. [61]

    The Astrophysical Journal810(1), 3 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07191 [astro-ph.IM]

    Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Chluba, J.: On the Detection of Spectral Ripples from the Recombination Epoch. The Astrophysical Journal810(1), 3 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07191 [astro-ph.IM]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/3

    2015 arXiv

  52. [62]

    The Astrophysical Jour- nal840(1), 33 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04602 [astro-ph.CO]

    Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Chluba, J.: Modeling the Radio Foreground for Detection of CMB Spectral Distortions from the Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionization. The Astrophysical Jour- nal840(1), 33 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04602 [a...

    2017 arXiv

  53. [63]

    In: 2016 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), pp

    Subrahmanyan, R., Raghunathan, A., Shankar, N.U., Singh, S., Puthige, S., Mahesh, N., Rao, M.S.: Wideband antennas for precision spectral radiome- ters for cosmology. In: 2016 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), pp. 438–441 (2016). IEEE

    2016

  54. [64]

    IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (2021)

    Raghunathan, A., Subrahmanyan, R., Shankar, N.U., Singh, S., Nambissan, J., Kavitha, K., Mahesh, N., Somashekar, R., Sindhu, G., Girish, B., et al.: A float- ing octave bandwidth cone-disc antenna for detection of cosmic dawn. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (2021)

    2021

  55. [65]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society349(3), 1137–1152 (2004) https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/349/3/1137/ 18649003/349-3-1137.pdf

    Santos, M.R.: Probing reionization with Lymanαemission lines. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society349(3), 1137–1152 (2004) https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/349/3/1137/ 18649003/349-3-1137.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.200...

    2004

  56. [66]

    Monsalve, R.A., Fialkov, A., Bowman, J.D., Rogers, A.E.E., Mozdzen, T.J., Cohen, A., Barkana, R., Mahesh, N.: Results from EDGES High-Band. III. New Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 40PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview Constraints on Parameters of the Early Univ...

    2019 arXiv

  57. [67]

    Space Science Reviews71(1- 4), 231–263 (1995)

    Bougeret, J.-L., Kaiser, M.L., Kellogg, P.J., Manning, R., Goetz, K., Monson, S., Monge, N., Friel, L., Meetre, C., Perche, C.,et al.: Waves: The radio and plasma wave investigation on the wind spacecraft. Space Science Reviews71(1- 4), 231–263 (1995)

    1995

  58. [68]

    IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory Techniques64(8), 2631–2639 (2016) https: //arxiv.org/abs/1606.02446 [astro-ph.IM]

    Monsalve, R.A., Rogers, A.E.E., Mozdzen, T.J., Bowman, J.D.: One-Port Direct/Reverse Method for Characterizing VNA Calibration Standards. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory Techniques64(8), 2631–2639 (2016) https: //arxiv.org/abs/1606.02446 [astro-ph.IM]. https://doi.org/10...

    2016 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 9(2), 2050006–70 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.00582 [astro-ph.IM]

    Girish, B.S., Srivani, K.S., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Singh, S., Jishnu Nambissan, T., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Somashekar, R., Raghu- nathan, A.: SARAS CD/EoR Radiometer: Design and Performance of the Digital Correlation Spectrometer. Journal of Astronomical Instru...

    2020 arXiv

  60. [70]

    IEEE Trans- actions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing29(1), 84–91 (1981)

    Nuttall, A.: Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior. IEEE Trans- actions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing29(1), 84–91 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163506

    1981

  61. [71]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society515(2), 1580–1597 (2022)

    Spinelli, M., Kyriakou, G., Bernardi, G., Bolli, P., Greenhill, L., Fialkov, A., Garsden, H.: Antenna beam characterization for the global 21-cm experiment leda and its impact on signal model parameter reconstruction. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society515(2), 15...

    2022

  62. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10345 (2023)

    Bale, S.D., Bassett, N., Burns, J.O., Jones, J.D., Goetz, K., Hellum- Bye, C., Hermann, S., Hibbard, J., Maksimovic, M., McLean, R., et al.: Lusee’night’: The lunar surface electromagnetics experiment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10345 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  63. [73]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520(1), 850–865 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2210.04707 [astro-ph.CO]

    Anstey, D., de Lera Acedo, E., Handley, W.: Use of time dependent data in Bayesian global 21-cm foreground and signal modelling. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520(1), 850–865 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2210.04707 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnr...

    2023 arXiv

  64. [74]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society453(4), 4384– 4398 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/ 453/4/4384/8034904/stv1911.pdf

    Handley, W.J., Hobson, M.P., Lasenby, A.N.: polychord: next-generation nested sampling. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society453(4), 4384– 4398 (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/ 453/4/4384/8034904/stv1911.pdf. https://doi.org/...

    2015 doi

  65. [75]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 122(3), 2836–2854 (2017)

    Pulupa, M., Bale, S., Bonnell, J., Bowen, T., Carruth, N., Goetz, K., Gordon, Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview41 D., Harvey, P., Maksimovic, M., Mart´ınez-Oliveros, J.,et al.: The solar probe plus radio frequency spectrometer: ...

    2017

  66. [76]

    IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine32(3), 41–44 (1990)

    Trainotti, V .: Simplified calculation of coverage area for mf am broadcast stations. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine32(3), 41–44 (1990)

    1990

  67. [77]

    In: Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXVI, vol

    Boroson, D.M., Robinson, B.S., Murphy, D.V ., Burianek, D.A., Khatri, F., Kovalik, J.M., Sodnik, Z., Cornwell, D.M.: Overview and results of the lunar laser communication demonstration. In: Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXVI, vol. 8971, p. 89710 (2...

    2014

  68. [78]

    Space Science Reviews185(1-4), 93–113 (2014)

    Horanyi, M., Sternovsky, Z., Lankton, M., Dumont, C., Gagnard, S., Gath- right, D., Gr ¨un, E., Hansen, D., James, D., Kempf, S.,et al.: The lunar dust experiment (ldex) onboard the lunar atmosphere and dust environment explorer (ladee) mission. Space Science Reviews185(1-4), ...

    2014

  69. [79]

    Space Science Reviews129(4), 391–419 (2007)

    Chin, G., Brylow, S., Foote, M., Garvin, J., Kasper, J., Keller, J., Litvak, M., Mitrofanov, I., Paige, D., Raney, K.,et al.: Lunar reconnaissance orbiter overview: The instrument suite and mission. Space Science Reviews129(4), 391–419 (2007)

    2007

  70. [80]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society122(6), 513– 522 (1961)

    Baldwin, J.: Thermal radiation from the moon and the heat flow through the lunar surface. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society122(6), 513– 522 (1961)

    1961

  71. [81]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00286 (2017)

    Plice, L., Galal, K., Burns, J.O.: Dare mission design: Low rfi observations from a low-altitude frozen lunar orbit. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00286 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  72. [82]

    The Astrophysical Journal858(1), 54 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11281 [astro-ph.CO]

    Singh, S., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Fialkov, A., Cohen, A., Barkana, R., Girish, B.S., Raghunathan, A., Somashekar, R., Srivani, K.S.: SARAS 2 Constraints on Global 21 cm Sig- nals from the Epoch of Reionization. The Astrophysical Journal858...

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.