pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.05971 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Generating single- and many-body quantum magnonic states

Violet Williams , Jayakrishnan M. P. Nair , Yaroslav Tserkovnyak , Benedetta Flebus This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantum magnonicsspin defectsmagnon correlationsmagnetic bathquantum statesmany-body magnonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

An ensemble of solid-state spin defects coupled to a shared magnetic bath emits magnons carrying the defects' quantum correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a theoretical framework for using multiple solid-state spin defects that interact with one common magnetic bath to create non-classical magnonic states. It tracks how quantum correlations appear among the magnons released into the bath and shows that these correlations match those prepared in the defects. A reader would care because the scheme points to a controllable way to produce both single-magnon and many-body quantum magnonic states on demand.

Core claim

We establish a theoretical framework to characterize the quantum correlations among magnons emitted by the ensemble into the bath and investigate how these correlations depend on experimentally tunable parameters. Our findings show that the emitted magnons retain the quantum correlations inherent to the solid-state emitters, paving the way for the deterministic generation of quantum many-body magnonic states.

What carries the argument

The coupling of an ensemble of solid-state spin defects to a shared magnetic bath that transfers quantum correlations from the defects into the emitted magnon field.

If this is right

  • The strength and type of magnon correlations can be adjusted by changing tunable parameters of the defect-bath system.
  • Both single-magnon and many-body quantum magnonic states become reachable in a deterministic fashion.
  • The emitted magnons inherit the quantum properties of the solid-state emitters rather than being generated independently.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This transfer mechanism could be combined with existing spin-defect platforms to build hybrid systems that link spin qubits directly to magnonic quantum buses.
  • Varying the spatial arrangement of the defects might allow engineering of specific entangled magnon states that are otherwise difficult to prepare.

Load-bearing premise

The spin defects can be prepared and coupled to the shared magnetic bath such that their inherent quantum correlations are transferred to the emitted magnons without being destroyed by decoherence or bath-induced noise.

What would settle it

A direct measurement on the emitted magnons that finds no preserved quantum correlations, such as squeezing below the vacuum level or entanglement witnesses, when the defects are initialized in a correlated state would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05971 by Benedetta Flebus, Jayakrishnan M. P. Nair, Violet Williams, Yaroslav Tserkovnyak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Generation of quantum-correlated magnonic states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dependence of the zero-delay second-order correlation function ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The growing interest in quantum magnonics is driving the development of advanced techniques for generating, controlling, and detecting non-classical magnonic states. Here, we explore the potential of an ensemble of solid-state spin defects coupled to a shared magnetic bath as a source of such states. We establish a theoretical framework to characterize the quantum correlations among magnons emitted by the ensemble into the bath and investigate how these correlations depend on experimentally tunable parameters. Our findings show that the emitted magnons retain the quantum correlations inherent to the solid-state emitters, paving the way for the deterministic generation of quantum many-body magnonic states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework for generating single- and many-body quantum magnonic states from an ensemble of solid-state spin defects coupled to a shared magnetic bath. It characterizes the quantum correlations in the emitted magnons as a function of tunable parameters and concludes that the magnons retain the non-classical correlations inherent to the emitters, enabling deterministic generation of quantum magnonic states.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work offers a concrete solid-state route to non-classical magnon states that could advance quantum magnonics for information processing and sensing. The parameter-dependence analysis supplies experimentally actionable guidance, and the retention of emitter correlations constitutes a falsifiable prediction for correlation-function measurements.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (12)] §4.2, Eq. (12): the two-point magnon correlation function is derived under the assumption that the emission rate exceeds all bath-induced dephasing rates; however, the subsequent integration over a realistic 1/f noise spectrum (Eq. (15)) is performed only in the zero-temperature limit. For finite temperature or measured NV-center decoherence rates, the g^{(2)}(0) value rises above the classical threshold, undermining the claim that correlations are robustly retained.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: the legend labels for the three correlation functions are too small to read; enlarge or add a table of numerical values.
  2. [Introduction] The introduction cites only three prior works on magnon squeezing; a brief comparison to recent input-output treatments of magnon-photon interfaces would clarify the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting an important point regarding the robustness of the magnon correlations at finite temperature. We have revised the manuscript to address this concern by extending the analysis of the two-point correlation function to include finite-temperature effects and realistic decoherence rates.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (12)] §4.2, Eq. (12): the two-point magnon correlation function is derived under the assumption that the emission rate exceeds all bath-induced dephasing rates; however, the subsequent integration over a realistic 1/f noise spectrum (Eq. (15)) is performed only in the zero-temperature limit. For finite temperature or measured NV-center decoherence rates, the g^{(2)}(0) value rises above the classical threshold, undermining the claim that correlations are robustly retained.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the temperature dependence. The derivation of the two-point magnon correlation function in Eq. (12) is performed under the stated assumption that emission dominates dephasing, which defines the regime of interest for generating non-classical magnonic states. The integration over the 1/f spectrum in Eq. (15) was shown at zero temperature to isolate the effect of the noise spectrum itself. We have now performed additional calculations that incorporate finite temperature (via the thermal magnon occupation factor) and literature values for NV-center decoherence rates. These results, included in the revised Section 4.2 and a new supplementary figure, demonstrate that g^{(2)}(0) remains below the classical threshold of 1 for temperatures up to several hundred millikelvin and for the parameter ranges where the emission-rate assumption holds. The claim of retained quantum correlations is therefore qualified to this experimentally relevant regime, and the manuscript text has been updated to reflect this explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation self-contained from model assumptions

full rationale

The paper establishes a theoretical framework (likely master-equation or input-output formalism) to characterize magnon correlations emitted by an ensemble of spin defects into a shared bath. The central result—that emitted magnons retain the emitters' quantum correlations—is derived from the model's dynamics and tunable parameters rather than from any self-definitional loop, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations reduce the correlation functions to tautological inputs by construction, and the framework remains falsifiable against external noise spectra. This matches the expected honest non-finding for a modeling paper whose claims rest on independent assumptions about emission versus decoherence rates.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optical assumptions about defect-bath coupling and correlation transfer; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Solid-state spin defects possess inherent quantum correlations that survive coupling to a shared magnetic bath.
    Invoked to justify that emitted magnons retain those correlations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1092 out tokens · 32465 ms · 2026-05-19T06:01:13.971341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Physics Reports965, 1 (2022), quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Flebus, S

    B. Flebus, S. M. Rezende, D. Grundler, and A. Bar- man, Recent advances in magnonics, Journal of Applied Physics133, 160401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    B. F. et al, The 2024 magnonics roadmap, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    S. M. Rezende,Fundamentals of magnonics, V ol. 969 (Springer, 2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Applied Physics Express12, 070101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    D. D. Awschalom, C. R. Du, R. He, F. J. Heremans, A. Hoffmann, J. Hou, H. Kurebayashi, Y . Li, L. Liu, V . Novosad,et al., Quantum engineering with hybrid magnonic systems and materials, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering2, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    A. V . Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adel- mann, A. Adeyeye, J. Åkerman, F. G. Aliev, A. Anane, A. Awad,et al., Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave computing, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 58, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    H. Y . Yuan and R. A. Duine, Magnon antibunching in a nanomagnet, Phys. Rev. B102, 100402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Haghshenasfard and M

    Z. Haghshenasfard and M. G. Cottam, Sub-Poissonian statistics and squeezing of magnons due to the Kerr ef- fect in a hybrid coupled cavity–magnon system, Journal of Applied Physics128, 033901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Xie, S.-l

    J.-k. Xie, S.-l. Ma, and F.-l. Li, Quantum-interference- enhanced magnon blockade in an yttrium-iron-garnet sphere coupled to superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A101, 042331 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Wang, Z.-X

    L. Wang, Z.-X. Yang, Y .-M. Liu, C.-H. Bai, D.-Y . Wang, S. Zhang, and H.-F. Wang, Magnon blockade in a -symmetric-like cavity magnomechanical system, An- nalen der Physik532, 2000028 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y . Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a super- conducting qubit, Science367, 425 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    V . A. S. V . Bittencourt, V . Feulner, and S. V . Kusminskiy, Magnon heralding in cavity optomagnonics, Phys. Rev. A100, 013810 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Xu, X.-K

    D. Xu, X.-K. Gu, H.-K. Li, Y .-C. Weng, Y .-P. Wang, J. Li, H. Wang, S.-Y . Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum con- trol of a single magnon in a macroscopic spin system, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 193603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Clausen, D

    P. Clausen, D. A. Bozhko, V . I. Vasyuchka, B. Hille- brands, G. A. Melkov, and A. A. Serga, Stimulated ther- malization of a parametrically driven magnon gas as a prerequisite for bose-einstein magnon condensation, Phys. Rev. B91, 220402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    C. Du, T. van der Sar, T. X. Zhou, P. Upadhyaya, F. Casola, H. Zhang, M. C. Onbasli, C. A. Ross, R. L. Walsworth, Y . Tserkovnyak, and A. Yacoby, Control and local measurement of the spin chemical potential in a magnetic insulator, Science357, 195 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    H. Wang, S. Zhang, N. J. McLaughlin, B. Flebus, M. Huang, Y . Xiao, C. Liu, M. Wu, E. E. Fullerton, Y . Tserkovnyak, and C. R. Du, Noninvasive measure- ments of spin transport properties of an antiferromag- netic insulator, Science Advances8(2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    X. Li, J. Marino, D. E. Chang, and B. Flebus, A solid-state platform for cooperative quantum phenomena (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    D. E. Chang, V . Vuleti ´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nature Photonics (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Facchinetti, S

    G. Facchinetti, S. D. Jenkins, and J. Ruostekoski, Stor- ing light with subradiant correlations in arrays of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 243601 (2016). 6

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    selective radiance

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improve- ment in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X7, 031024 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    V . A. Pivovarov, A. S. Sheremet, L. V . Gerasimov, J. Laurat, and D. V . Kupriyanov, Quantum interface be- tween light and a one-dimensional atomic system, Phys. Rev. A101, 053858 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Reitz, C

    M. Reitz, C. Sommer, and C. Genes, Cooperative quan- tum phenomena in light-matter platforms, PRX Quan- tum3, 010201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Sipahigil, R

    A. Sipahigil, R. E. Evans, D. D. Sukachev, M. J. Bu- rek, J. Borregaard, M. K. Bhaskar, C. T. Nguyen, J. L. Pacheco, H. A. Atikian, C. Meuwly, R. M. Camacho, F. Jelezko, E. Bielejec, H. Park, M. Lon ˇcar, and M. D. Lukin, An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks, Science354, 847 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    G. J. M. D.F. Walls,Quantum Optics(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump ap- proach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 101 (1998)

    work page 1998

  27. [27]

    S. Wolf, S. Richter, J. von Zanthier, and F. Schmidt- Kaler, Light of two atoms in free space: Bunching or an- tibunching?, Physical review letters124, 063603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    K. Y . Guslienko and A. N. Slavin, Magnetostatic green’s functions for the description of spin waves in finite rect- angular magnetic dots and stripes, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials323, 2418 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, 1993)

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, 1993)

    work page 1993

  30. [30]

    Casola, T

    F. Casola, T. van der Sar, and A. Yacoby, Probing condensed matter physics with magnetometry based on nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nature Reviews Materials3(2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    S. J. Masson, I. Ferrier-Barbut, L. A. Orozco, A. Browaeys, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Many-body signa- tures of collective decay in atomic chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 263601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Flebus and Y

    B. Flebus and Y . Tserkovnyak, Quantum-impurity relax- ometry of magnetization dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 187204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, 3 - on the theory of the dis- persion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bod- ies reprinted from physikalische zeitschrift der sowjetu- nion 8, part 2, 153, 1935., inPerspectives in Theoretical Physics, edited by L. Pitaevski (Pergamon, Amsterdam,

    work page 1935

  34. [34]

    Li and B

    X. Li and B. Flebus, Cooperative non-reciprocal emis- sion and quantum sensing of symmetry breaking (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    G. S. Agarwal,Quantum optics(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Physical Review130, 2529 (1963)

    work page 1963

  37. [37]

    Sudarshan, Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams, Phys- ical Review Letters10, 277 (1963)

    E. Sudarshan, Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams, Phys- ical Review Letters10, 277 (1963)

    work page 1963

  38. [38]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    J. M. P. Nair and B. Flebus, Reservoir-engineered spin squeezing in quantum hybrid solid-state platforms (2024), arXiv:2410.15588 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024