Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Haloscopes and helioscopes are the only routes to QCD axion couplings.

desk verdict A solid, current pedagogical review of haloscopes and helioscopes; no new science, but the central QCD-reach claim is conditional on a 100% axion dark-matter fraction that is disclosed yet not quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06414 v1 pith:2JL636A5 submitted 2025-07-08 hep-ph hep-ex

Babette Döbrich , Igor G. Irastorza This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords axiondarkmatterhaloscopehelioscopeaxion-photoncouplingPrimakoffeffectQCDsolaraxions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the experimental search for axions has two working pillars, both built on the axion-photon coupling: haloscopes, which look for the local dark-matter axion field converting into photons in a resonant microwave cavity inside a magnetic field, and helioscopes, which convert solar axions into X-rays in a magnet pointed at the Sun. The authors' central claim is that these two techniques are the only ones whose sensitivity has reached down to the couplings predicted for QCD axion models at low masses, and that next-generation instruments are positioned to scan substantially new parameter space. A sympathetic reading of the review is that the field is now close to the point where a definitive test of the 'vanilla' QCD axion as dark matter is technically feasible, provided the dark matter is entirely axions and the halo model is right. The review also catalogs the non-axion scenarios that the same hardware can probe, from dark photons to high-frequency gravitational waves.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the axion-photon coupling $g_{a\gamma}$ and the Primakoff effect, the photon-to-axion and axion-to-photon conversion in a magnetic field. In a haloscope, a resonant cavity of quality factor $Q$ inside a field $B$ converts the local axion field into a narrow microwave line with power $P_s = \kappa Q g_{a\gamma}^2 B^2 |G_m|^2 V \rho_a / m_a$; in a helioscope, an axion crossing a transverse field $B$ over length $L$ converts with probability $P(a\to\gamma) = 2.6\times10^{-17} (g_{a\gamma}/10^{-10}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1})^2 (B/10\,\mathrm{T})^2 (L/10\,\mathrm{m})^2 F(qL)$. The coherence form factor $F(qL)$ and the resonator quality factor determine where each technique works, and the figures of merit $F_{\rm halo}$ and $F_{\rm helio}$ show which experimental parameters matter. The review's map of the field is organized by these two mechanisms.

What would settle it

A measurement establishing that axions constitute, say, 1% of the dark matter would force the haloscope exclusion lines in the review's Fig. 3 to be weakened by a factor of 10, potentially moving them above the QCD axion band and falsifying the claim that haloscopes probe QCD axion couplings.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the axion's generic coupling to two photons, $g_{a\gamma}$, is the main mechanism of direct detection: the same Primakoff conversion that would let axions become photons in a magnetic field powers both the resonant-cavity haloscope and the magnetized helioscope. The review asserts that haloscopes and helioscopes are the only techniques that have reached sensitivity to QCD axion couplings in the low-mass range, with haloscopes having excluded part of the $\mu$eV band down to the DFSZ benchmark and helioscopes having set the most competitive solar-axion bound at $g_{a\gamma} < 0.58 \times 10^{-10}$ GeV$^{-1}$ for $m_a \lesssim 0.01$ eV. It presents the next steps, larger multibore magnets with X-ray focusing and haloscopes with quantum-limited or single-photon readout, as sufficient to push into previously untested QCD-axion territory. The underlying physics target is a single number, the coupling $g_{a\gamma}$, with the instruments' reach expressed through explicit figures of merit.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that haloscopes are approaching QCD axion couplings assumes that 100% of the local dark matter is axions and that their velocities follow the Standard Halo Model; if the axion fraction is lower or the velocity distribution differs, the sensitivity and discovery reach must be rescaled.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the haloscope sensitivity curves in the review are correct, the $\mu$eV mass band around the DFSZ benchmark is now experimentally testable, so a null scan over that band would exclude a leading 'vanilla' QCD axion dark-matter model.
  • If IAXO reaches $g_{a\gamma}\sim$ few $\times 10^{-12}$ GeV$^{-1}$, it would beat the current solar-axion bound by about a factor of 20 and enter parameter space not yet excluded by astrophysics.
  • A confirmed haloscope signal would measure the axion mass and, with high statistics, reveal the velocity distribution of the local dark-matter halo, opening a new probe of galactic phase-space structure.
  • A confirmed helioscope signal would allow the axion's parity, its couplings to photons, electrons, and nucleons, and even solar properties to be disentangled through the energy spectrum and polarization of converted photons.
  • The same instruments can search for dark photons, a cosmic axion background, high-frequency gravitational waves, chameleons, and axion quark nuggets, so their physics case extends beyond the axion itself.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the local axion fraction of dark matter is much smaller than unity, every haloscope exclusion line in the review must be rescaled upward; combining haloscope data with other dark-matter probes could turn the assumed fraction into a measured parameter.
  • Editorial inference: the review's reliance on the Standard Halo Model could be tested by comparing haloscope line-shape fits with velocity distributions from N-body simulations; a detected narrow stream would shift the optimal search strategy toward longer integration times, an extension the paper mentions only in passing.
  • Editorial inference: a testable extension is to use the daily modulation of the signal, already discussed for the cosmic axion background, as a discriminant for dark-matter axions against stationary backgrounds; the review does not apply this to the standard halo search.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a pedagogical review of direct searches for axions, covering haloscopes for dark matter axions and helioscopes for solar axions. It presents the history, the basic physics of axion-photon conversion, the key experimental formulas, the data analysis procedures, and a broad set of related physics topics (dark photons, cosmic axion background, high-frequency gravitational waves, axion quark nuggets, chameleons, supernova axions, and post-discovery programs). It also discusses complementarity with other probes and near-term technological developments, including quantum sensing and superconducting cavities. The central claim is that haloscopes and helioscopes are currently the only techniques with sensitivity reaching QCD axion couplings in the low-mass range, a statement that the paper explicitly conditions on axions making up 100% of the local dark matter for the haloscope case.

Significance. As a review, this manuscript is a useful and up-to-date entry point for students and researchers. It reproduces the standard formulas (e.g., haloscope power Eq. (4), helioscope conversion probability Eq. (8), solar axion flux Eq. (7)) with consistent notation and cites the relevant literature extensively. The review is transparent about its main assumptions, notably the axion dark matter fraction for haloscopes, which it flags in Section 2.1 and in the caption of Figure 3. The breadth of coverage and the explicit discussion of assumptions are strengths. Once the local errors identified below are fixed, the manuscript will serve as a reliable pedagogical reference.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (6)] The figure of merit F_halo is incorrectly specified. The text says F_halo is 'proportional to the time needed to scan a fixed mass range down to a given signal-to-noise ratio,' but the expression shown scales as T_sys^{-2} and Q in the numerator, which are inverse-time (scan-rate) dependencies, not time-to-scan dependencies. Furthermore, the mass dependence is inverted relative to the standard haloscope scan-rate result: the scan rate is proportional to g_aγ^4 B^4 V^2 ρ_a^2 |G|^4 Q / (m_a^2 T_sys^2), whereas Eq. (6) has m_a^2 in the numerator. Please correct both the definition and the scaling; as written, the equation will mislead readers about how the mass of the axion affects the scan duration and sensitivity.
  2. [Section 2, first paragraph of Section 2] The claim that haloscopes and helioscopes are 'the only techniques having reached sensitivity down to QCD axion couplings' is a central message of the review, but it is stated without an immediate numerical caveat about the dark matter fraction. Although Section 2.1 and the Figure 3 caption state the assumption f = ρ_a/ρ_DM = 1 and note that limits should be rescaled for subdominant components, the review would be strengthened by stating the explicit scaling g_aγ ∝ 1/sqrt(f) at the point of the claim. Without this, a newcomer could reasonably read the claim as unconditional, which overstates what has been achieved if the axion is not all of the dark matter.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (3)] The numerical estimate for the coherence length is inconsistent with the formula: for m_a = 10 μeV and σ_v ~ 10^{-3}, π/2 / (m_a σ_v) ≈ 31 m, not ~200 m as written. Please correct the numerical value or the expression.
  2. [Section 6.3] The text states that 'T_phys itself is fundamentally constrained by the Standard Quantum Limit (SQL) ... defined as T_SQL ~ h f / k_B'. This is imprecise: the physical temperature of the cavity can be far below T_SQL (e.g., 20 mK versus ~500 mK at 10 GHz), and it is the added noise of a phase-preserving linear amplifier that is bounded from below by the SQL. Please rephrase to distinguish the cavity physical temperature from the amplifier noise temperature.
  3. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says the y-axis is 'scaled with the local axion DM density relative to the total DM density, ρ̃_a = ρ_a/ρ_DM, assumed unity in this plot, to stress that these experiments produce bounds that are dependent on the assumed fraction of DM in the form of axions.' Since plotting C_aγ sqrt(ρ̃_a) actually makes the displayed bounds independent of ρ̃_a, the phrasing is confusing. Consider clarifying that the displayed bounds are for ρ̃_a = 1 and that the scaling factor is included to remind readers how the physical limits would shift for other fractions.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected, including 'helioscscopes' and 'DSZF' in the introductory paragraph of Section 4, 'a priory' and 'calssical' in Section 6.1, 'analising' in Section 4.7, a double parenthesis in Section 2.2 ('Section 6.4)).'), and 'glass ball' instead of 'crystal ball' in the opening of Section 6.
  5. [Section 2.1] The phrase 'Haloscopes rely on the assumption that the 100% of the dark matter is in the form of axions' could be rephrased as 'that 100% of the dark matter is in the form of axions' for grammatical clarity. Additionally, the rescaling statement would be more useful if it explicitly gave the 1/sqrt(f) dependence on the axion fraction f.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a pedagogical review whose claims rest on external experimental results and standard theory, not on self-referential derivations.

full rationale

This manuscript is a pedagogical review of axion haloscope and helioscope searches. It does not claim to derive new predictions from first principles; instead, it compiles and explains results obtained by external collaborations (ADMX, CAPP, CAST, HAYSTAC, etc.) using well-established theoretical formulas such as the Primakoff conversion power in Eq. (4), the helioscope conversion probability in Eq. (8), and the solar axion flux in Eq. (7). These formulas are standard physics taken from the literature, not invented within the paper, and they are not fitted to the experimental limits that the paper reports. The sensitivity statements, e.g., that haloscopes and helioscopes are 'the only techniques having reached sensitivity down to QCD axion couplings,' are inherited from published experimental results and benchmark models (KSVZ, DFSZ), not derived from the paper's own assumptions. The paper explicitly flags the key assumption underlying haloscope bounds, namely that 100% of the local dark matter is axions, and notes that sensitivity should be rescaled for a subdominant component; this is a stated caveat, not a hidden circular input. Self-citations appear (e.g., refs. [8], [9], [58], [61], [65]) but only to point to prior reviews, conceptual design documents, and physics-potential studies; the central claims do not reduce to those citations, and no uniqueness or existence theorem from the authors' own work is invoked to forbid alternatives. The paper is self-contained as a review against external benchmarks, and no step in its argument chain equates a prediction with an input by construction. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review, so it introduces no new entities or fitted parameters of its own. The listed free parameter and axioms are the assumptions from the cited literature on which the review's central statements about experimental sensitivity depend.

free parameters (1)
  • gamma, beta, sigma_v (halo velocity distribution fit constants) = values from N-body fits in [25]
    These fitting constants determine the expected axion signal lineshape in haloscope analyses (Eq. 2). They are fitted to N-body simulations in the cited work, not derived in this review.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Axions exist and have a two-photon coupling g_a_gamma.
    The entire reviewed experimental program searches for this hypothetical particle; the paper does not prove existence.
  • domain assumption The local dark matter halo is composed 100% of axions for interpreting haloscope limits.
    Explicitly stated in Section 2.1: 'Haloscopes rely on the assumption that the 100% of the dark matter is in the form of axions.'
  • domain assumption The axion velocity distribution follows the Standard Halo Model.
    Used for the expected signal lineshape; the paper notes this is a modeling assumption and that N-body fits (Eq. 2) are used.
  • domain assumption The solar interior and its plasma are known well enough to predict the solar axion flux.
    The Primakoff flux prediction relies on solar models; the paper cites a percent-level uncertainty from [44].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2JL636A5

@misc{pith2026250706414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2JL636A5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06414}
}
read the original abstract

We present a pedagogical introduction to the direct search of axions as dark matter, as well as to searches for solar axions. The plethora of experimental searches exploit the axion's coupling to two photons: They attempt to convert the axion dark matter to photons in a resonator placed in an external magnetic field or convert solar axions into X-rays in a magnet pointing towards the sun. We give a basic introduction to this concept, its many variants and to searches that exploit the axion's other couplings. We also speculate about potentially transformative developments for such searches in the near-term future.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Holographic QCD Axion in Five Dimensions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 5D holographic QCD axion model identifies bulk modes for the axion and eta prime, traces the quality problem to insufficient compositeness, and finds the physical axion mostly in the bulk gauge field when quality is high.

  2. The VORTEX cavity for the RADES axion haloscope

    physics.ins-det 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A split-cylinder axion haloscope tunes continuously from 9 to 8.2 GHz with modest Q loss, operates at millikelvin temperatures, and its TM010 field profile passes bead-pull verification.

  3. Counting axions with IAXO

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Projections for IAXO in two-axion parameter space plus spectral analysis of flavor oscillations show where the experiment can discriminate multi-axion signals from single-axion ones, extending to N-axion cases.

  4. Oscillating Imprints of Dark Matter in Mesons Decays

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ultralight dark matter induces oscillating CKM elements that can be probed at NA62 through direct counting of meson decay events, which avoids sensitivity loss from unknown particle flux.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

200 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Brice Maximilien, The RADES detector at the CAST experiment, CDS database (2021), general Photo, URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/ record/2767149

    arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Marco Cirelli, Alessandro Strumia, Jure Zupan, Dark Matter, to appear (2024),2406.01705

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Csaba Balazs, Torsten Bringmann, Felix Kahlhoefer, Martin White, A Primer on Dark Matter, to appear (2024),2411.05062

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, Cosmology of axion dark matter, PoS COSMICWISPers (2024) 040, doi:10.22323/1.454.0040,2403.17697

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, Enrico Nardi, Luca Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1–117, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002,2003.01100

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Pierre Sikivie, Axion dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 1003 (2024) 116500, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116500

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    536 (1) (2024) 2300106, doi:10.1002/andp.202300106,2308.08612

    Felix Yu, Primer on Axion Physics, Annalen Phys. 536 (1) (2024) 2300106, doi:10.1002/andp.202300106,2308.08612

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Igor Garcia Irastorza, An introduction to axions and their detection, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 45 (2022) 1, doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhysLectNotes.45,2109.07376

    arXiv 2022

Show all 200 references
  1. [9]

    Irastorza, Javier Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Prog

    Igor G. Irastorza, Javier Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102 (2018) 89–159, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003,1801.08127

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    C. B. Adams, et al., Axion Dark Matter, in: Snowmass 2021 2022, p. all,2203.14923

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Masha Baryakhtar, Leslie Rosenberg, Gray Rybka, Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion, to appear (2025),2504.10607

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    R. D. Peccei, Helen R. Quinn, CP conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.38.1440

    1977

  5. [13]

    R. D. Peccei, Helen R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  6. [14]

    Steven Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    1978 doi

  7. [15]

    Frank Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.40.279

    1978

  8. [16]

    Wise, Frank Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys

    John Preskill, Mark B. Wise, Frank Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127–132, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83) 90637-8

    1983 doi

  9. [17]

    L. F . Abbott, P . Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90638-X

    1983 doi

  10. [18]

    Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90639-1

    1983 doi

  11. [19]

    Sikivie, Experimental tests of the invisible axion, Phys

    P . Sikivie, Experimental tests of the invisible axion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1415

    1983 doi

  12. [20]

    De Panfilis-Wuensch, Y

    Walter Wuensch, S. De Panfilis-Wuensch, Y . K. Semertzidis, J. T. Rogers, A. C. Melissinos, H. J. Halama, B. E. Moskowitz, A. G. Prodell, W. B. Fowler, F . A. Nezrick, Results of a Laboratory Search for Cosmic Axions and Other Weakly Coupled Light Particles, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1...

    1989 doi

  13. [21]

    D. M. Lazarus, et al., A Search for solar axions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2333–2336, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2333

    1992 doi

  14. [22]

    Shigetaka Moriyama, et al., Direct search for solar axions by using strong magnetic field and X-ray detectors, Phys. Lett. B434 (1998) 147, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00766-7,hep-ex/9805026

    1998 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Y oshizumi Inoue, et al., Search for sub-electronvolt solar axions using coherent conversion of axions into photons in magnetic field and gas helium, Phys. Lett. B536 (2002) 18–23, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01822-1,astro-ph/0204388

    2002 arXiv

  16. [24]

    de Salas, Axel Widmark, Dark matter local density determination: recent observations and future prospects, Rept

    Pablo F . de Salas, Axel Widmark, Dark matter local density determination: recent observations and future prospects, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (10) (2021) 104901, doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac24e7,2012.11477

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lentz, Thomas R

    Erik W. Lentz, Thomas R. Quinn, Leslie J. Rosenberg, Michael J. Tremmel, A New Signal Model for Axion Cavity Searches from N-Body Simulations, Astrophys. J. 845 (2) (2017) 121, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa80dd,1703.06937

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Pierre Sikivie, I. I. Tkachev, Yun Wang, The Velocity peaks in the cold dark matter spectrum on earth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 2911– 2915, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2911,astro-ph/9504052

    1995 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Chakrabarty, Y aqi Han, Anthony H

    Sankha S. Chakrabarty, Y aqi Han, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Pierre Sikivie, Implications of triangular features in the Gaia skymap for the Caustic Ring Model of the Milky Way halo, Phys. Dark Univ. 33 (2021) 100838, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100838,2007.10509

    2021

  20. [28]

    Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, Giovanni Pierobon, Javier Redondo, Axion Minicluster Streams in the Solar Neighborhood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (8) (2024) 081001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.081001,2311.17367

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Semertzidis, Revisiting the detection rate for axion haloscopes, JCAP 03 (2020) 066, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/066,2001.05605

    Dongok Kim, Junu Jeong, SungWoo Y oun, Y ounggeun Kim, Y annis K. Semertzidis, Revisiting the detection rate for axion haloscopes, JCAP 03 (2020) 066, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/066,2001.05605

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Du, et al

    N. Du, et al. (ADMX), A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (15) (2018) 151301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.151301,1804.05750

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Braine, et al

    T. Braine, et al. (ADMX), Extended Search for the Invisible Axion with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (10) (2020) 101303, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.101303,1910.08638

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bartram, et al

    C. Bartram, et al. (ADMX), Search for ”Invisible” Axion Dark Matter in the3.3-4.2µeV Mass Range, to appear (2021),2110.06096

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Carosi, et al

    G. Carosi, et al. (ADMX), Search for Axion Dark Matter from 1.1 to 1.3 GHz with ADMX, to appear (2025),2504.07279

    2025

  26. [34]

    J. Kim, O. Kwon, C. Kutlu, W. Chung, A. Matlashov, Y . K. Semertzidis, Near-Quantum-Noise Axion Dark Matter Search at CAPP around 5.3µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 091602, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.091602,2211.07929

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Y ang, H

    B. Y ang, H. Y oon, M. Ahn, Y . Lee, J. Y oo, Extended axion dark matter search using the CAPP18T haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 081801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.081801,2306.08565

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S. Ahn, J. M. Kim, B. I. Ivanov, O. Kwon, H. S. Byun, Y . K. Semertzidis, Extensive search for axion dark matter over 1 GHz with CAPP’s Main Axion eXperiment (CAPP-MAX), Phys. Rev. X 14 (2024) 031023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031023,2402.07941

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Alesini, et al., Galactic axions search with a superconducting resonant cavity, Phys

    D. Alesini, et al., Galactic axions search with a superconducting resonant cavity, Phys. Rev. D 99 (10) (2019) 101101, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.101101,1903.06547

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Ahyoune, et al., RADES axion search results with a high-temperature superconducting cavity in an 11.7 T magnet, JHEP 04 (2025) 113, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2025)113,2403.07790

    S. Ahyoune, et al., RADES axion search results with a high-temperature superconducting cavity in an 11.7 T magnet, JHEP 04 (2025) 113, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2025)113,2403.07790

    2025

  31. [39]

    Boutan, et al

    C. Boutan, et al. (ADMX), Piezoelectrically Tuned Multimode Cavity Search for Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) (2018) 261302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.261302,1901.00920

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    ´Alvarez Melc ´on, et al., Scalable haloscopes for axion dark matter detection in the 30µeV range with RADES, JHEP 07 (2020) 084, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)084,2002.07639

    A. ´Alvarez Melc ´on, et al., Scalable haloscopes for axion dark matter detection in the 30µeV range with RADES, JHEP 07 (2020) 084, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)084,2002.07639. Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions21

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    ´Alvarez Melc ´on, et al

    A. ´Alvarez Melc ´on, et al. (CAST), First results of the CAST -RADES haloscope search for axions at 34.67µeV, JHEP 10 (2020) 075, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)075,2104.13798

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Kim, Y annis K

    Junu Jeong, SungWoo Y oun, Sungjae Bae, Jihngeun Kim, Taehyeon Seong, Jihn E. Kim, Y annis K. Semertzidis, Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with a Multiple-Cell Haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (22) (2020) 221302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.221302,2008.10141

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Andriamonje, et al

    S. Andriamonje, et al. (CAST), An improved limit on the axion-photon coupling from the CAST experiment, JCAP 0704 (2007) 010, hep-ex/0702006

    2007 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Millar, Edoardo Vitagliano, Revisiting longitudinal plasmon-axion conversion in external magnetic fields, Phys

    Andrea Caputo, Alexander J. Millar, Edoardo Vitagliano, Revisiting longitudinal plasmon-axion conversion in external magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 101 (12) (2020) 123004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123004,2005.00078

    2020 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Ersilia Guarini, Pierluca Carenza, Javier Galan, Maurizio Giannotti, Alessandro Mirizzi, Production of axionlike particles from photon conversions in large-scale solar magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 102 (12) (2020) 123024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123024,2010.06601

    2020 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, Andrea Caputo, Alexander J. Millar, Edoardo Vitagliano, Axion helioscopes as solar magnetometers, Phys. Rev. D 102 (4) (2020) 043019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043019,2006.10415

    2020 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Javier Redondo, Solar axion flux from the axion-electron coupling, JCAP 1312 (2013) 008, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/008,1310.0823

    2013 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Barth, A

    K. Barth, A. Belov, B. Beltran, H. Brauninger, J.M. Carmona, et al., CAST constraints on the axion-electron coupling, JCAP 1305 (2013) 010, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/05/010,1302.6283

    2013 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Letter of Intent to the CERN SPS committee, Tech

    Igor G Irastorza (IAXO), The International Axion Observatory IAXO. Letter of Intent to the CERN SPS committee, Tech. Rep. CERN- SPSC-2013-022. SPSC-I-242, CERN, Geneva 2013

    2013

  42. [52]

    Zioutas, et al

    K. Zioutas, et al. (CAST), First results from the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 121301, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.94.121301,hep-ex/0411033

    2005 arXiv

  43. [53]

    van Bibber, P

    K. van Bibber, P . M. McIntyre, D. E. Morris, G. G. Raffelt, Design for a practical laboratory detector for solar axions, Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 2089, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2089

    1989 doi

  44. [54]

    Altenm ¨uller, et al

    K. Altenm ¨uller, et al. (CAST), New Upper Limit on the Axion-Photon Coupling with an Extended CAST Run with a Xe-Based Micromegas Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (22) (2024) 221005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.221005,2406.16840

    2024 arXiv

  45. [55]

    Arik, et al

    E. Arik, et al. (CAST), Probing eV-scale axions with CAST, JCAP 02 (2009) 008, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/02/008,0810.4482

    2009 arXiv

  46. [56]

    Aune, et al

    S. Aune, et al. (CAST), CAST search for sub-eV mass solar axions with 3He buffer gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 261302, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.261302,1106.3919

    2011 arXiv

  47. [57]

    Arik, et al

    M. Arik, et al. (CAST), Search for Solar Axions by the CERN Axion Solar Telescope with 3He Buffer Gas: Closing the Hot Dark Matter Gap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (9) (2014) 091302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.091302,1307.1985

    2014 arXiv

  48. [58]

    Irastorza, F .T

    Igor G. Irastorza, F .T. Avignone, S. Caspi, J.M. Carmona, T. Dafni, et al., Towards a new generation axion helioscope, JCAP 1106 (2011) 013, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/06/013,1103.5334

    2011 arXiv

  49. [59]

    Andriamonje, et al

    S. Andriamonje, et al. (CAST), Search for solar axion emission from 7LiandD(p,γ) 3Henuclear decays with the CASTγ-ray calorimeter, JCAP 03 (2010) 032, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/03/032,0904.2103

    2010 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Andriamonje, et al

    S. Andriamonje, et al. (CAST), Search for 14.4-keV solar axions emitted in the M1-transition of Fe-57 nuclei with CAST, JCAP 0912 (2009) 002, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/12/002,0906.4488

    2009 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Armengaud, F .T

    E. Armengaud, F .T. Avignone, M. Betz, P . Brax, P . Brun, et al., Conceptual Design of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO), JINST 9 (2014) T05002, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/T05002,1401.3233

    2014 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Shilon, A

    I. Shilon, A. Dudarev, H. Silva, U. Wagner, H. H. J. ten Kate, The Superconducting Toroid for the New International AXion Observatory (IAXO), IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24 (3) (2014) 4500104, doi:10.1109/TASC.2013.2280654,1309.2117

    2014

  53. [63]

    Aznar, et al., A Micromegas-based low-background x-ray detector coupled to a slumped-glass telescope for axion research, JCAP 1512 (2015) 008,1509.06190

    F . Aznar, et al., A Micromegas-based low-background x-ray detector coupled to a slumped-glass telescope for axion research, JCAP 1512 (2015) 008,1509.06190

    2015 arXiv

  54. [64]

    Abeln, et al

    A. Abeln, et al. (IAXO), Conceptual design of BabyIAXO, the intermediate stage towards the International Axion Observatory, JHEP 05 (2021) 137, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)137,2010.12076

    2021 arXiv

  55. [66]

    Gal ´an, et al., Exploring 0.1-10 eV axions with a new helioscope concept, JCAP 1512 (2015) 012,1508.03006

    J. Gal ´an, et al., Exploring 0.1-10 eV axions with a new helioscope concept, JCAP 1512 (2015) 012,1508.03006

    2015 arXiv

  56. [67]

    Buchm ¨uller, F

    W. Buchm ¨uller, F . Hoogeveen, Coherent production of light scalar particles in Bragg scattering, Phys.Lett. B237 (1990) 278, doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(90)91444-G

    1990

  57. [68]

    E. A. Paschos, K. Zioutas, A Proposal for solar axion detection via Bragg scattering, Phys. Lett. B323 (1994) 367–372, doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(94)91233-5

    1994

  58. [69]

    R. J. Creswick, et al., Theory for the direct detection of solar axions by coherent Primakoff conversion in germanium detectors, Phys. Lett. B427 (1998) 235–240, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00183-X,hep-ph/9708210

    1998 arXiv

  59. [70]

    T., et al

    III Avignone, F . T., et al. (SOLAX), Experimental Search for Solar Axions via Coherent Primakoff Conversion in a Germanium Spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 5068–5071, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5068,astro-ph/9708008

    1998 arXiv

  60. [71]

    Morales, et al

    A. Morales, et al. (COSME), Particle Dark Matter and Solar Axion Searches with a small germanium detector at the Canfranc Underground Laboratory, Astropart. Phys. 16 (2002) 325–332, doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(01)00117-7,hep-ex/0101037

    2002 arXiv

  61. [72]

    Bernabei, et al., Search for solar axions by Primakoff effect in NaI crystals, Phys

    R. Bernabei, et al., Search for solar axions by Primakoff effect in NaI crystals, Phys. Lett. B515 (2001) 6–12, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01) 00840-1

    2001 doi

  62. [73]

    Ahmed, et al

    Z. Ahmed, et al. (CDMS), Search for Axions with the CDMS Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 141802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103. 141802,0902.4693

    2009 arXiv

  63. [74]

    Armengaud, et al., Axion searches with the EDELWEISS-II experiment, JCAP 11 (2013) 067, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/067,1307

    E. Armengaud, et al., Axion searches with the EDELWEISS-II experiment, JCAP 11 (2013) 067, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/067,1307. 1488

    2013 doi

  64. [75]

    Dawei. Li, R. J. Creswick, F . T. Avignone, Yuanxu. Wang, Theoretical Estimate of the Sensitivity of the CUORE Detector to Solar Axions, JCAP 1510 (2015) 065, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/065,1507.00603

    2015 arXiv

  65. [76]

    Elliott, Solar Axion Search Technique with Correlated Signals from Multiple Detectors, Astropart

    Wenqin Xu, Steven R. Elliott, Solar Axion Search Technique with Correlated Signals from Multiple Detectors, Astropart. Phys. 89 (2017) 39–50, doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.01.008,1610.03886

    2017 arXiv

  66. [77]

    Cebri ´an, et al., Prospects of solar axion searches with crystal detectors, Astropart

    S. Cebri ´an, et al., Prospects of solar axion searches with crystal detectors, Astropart. Phys. 10 (1999) 397–404, doi:10.1016/ S0927-6505(98)00069-3,astro-ph/9811359

    1999 arXiv

  67. [78]

    F . T. Avignone, R. J. Creswick, S. Nussinov, The experimental challenge of detecting solar axion-like particles to test cosmological ALP- photon oscillation hypothesis, Astropart. Phys. 34 (2011) 640–642, doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2010.12.012,1002.2718. 22Experiments to tes...

    2011 arXiv

  68. [79]

    Ljubicic, D

    A. Ljubicic, D. Kekez, Z. Krecak, T. Ljubicic, Search for hadronic axions using axioelectric effect, Phys.Lett. B599 (2004) 143–147, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.038,hep-ex/0403045

    2004 arXiv

  69. [80]

    Derbin, A.S

    A.V. Derbin, A.S. Kayunov, V.N. Muratova, D.A. Semenov, E.V. Unzhakov, Constraints on the axion-electron coupling for solar axions produced by Compton process and bremsstrahlung, Phys.Rev. D83 (2011) 023505, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023505,1101.2290

    2011 arXiv

  70. [81]

    Derbin, V.N

    A.V. Derbin, V.N. Muratova, D.A. Semenov, E.V. Unzhakov, New limit on the mass of 14.4-keV solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Fe-57 nuclei, Phys.Atom.Nucl. 74 (2011) 596–602, doi:10.1134/S1063778811040041

    2011 doi

  71. [82]

    Derbin, I.S

    A.V. Derbin, I.S. Drachnev, A.S. Kayunov, V.N. Muratova, Search for solar axions produced by Compton process and bremsstrahlung using axioelectric effect, JETP Lett. 95 (2012) 379,1206.4142

    2012 arXiv

  72. [83]

    Bellini, et al

    G. Bellini, et al. (Borexino), Search for Solar Axions Produced inp(d, 3He)AReaction with Borexino Detector, Phys.Rev. D85 (2012) 092003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.092003,1203.6258

    2012 arXiv

  73. [84]

    Abe, et al., Search for solar axions in XMASS, a large liquid-xenon detector, Phys

    K. Abe, et al., Search for solar axions in XMASS, a large liquid-xenon detector, Phys. Lett. B724 (2013) 46–50, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013. 05.060,1212.6153

    2013 arXiv

  74. [85]

    Aprile, et al

    E. Aprile, et al. (XENON100), First Axion Results from the XENON100 Experiment, Phys. Rev. D90 (6) (2014) 062009, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.062009,10.1103/PhysRevD.95.029904, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D95,no.2,029904(2017)],1404.1455

    2014 arXiv

  75. [86]

    (PandaX), Limits on Axion Couplings from the First 80 Days of Data of the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys

    Changbo Fu, et al. (PandaX), Limits on Axion Couplings from the First 80 Days of Data of the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) (2017) 181806, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181806,1707.07921

    2017 arXiv

  76. [87]

    D. S. Akerib, et al. (LUX), First Searches for Axions and Axionlike Particles with the LUX Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (26) (2017) 261301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.261301,1704.02297

    2017 arXiv

  77. [88]

    75 (1995) 3222– 3225, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3222,hep-ph/9504318

    Shigetaka Moriyama, A Proposal to search for a monochromatic component of solar axions using Fe-57, Phys.Rev.Lett. 75 (1995) 3222– 3225, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3222,hep-ph/9504318

    1995 arXiv

  78. [89]

    Krcmar, Z

    M. Krcmar, Z. Krecak, M. Stipcevic, A. Ljubicic, D.A. Bradley, Search for invisible axions using Fe-57, Phys.Lett. B442 (1998) 38, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01231-3,nucl-ex/9801005

    1998 arXiv

  79. [90]

    Krcmar, Z

    M. Krcmar, Z. Krecak, A. Ljubicic, M. Stipcevic, D.A. Bradley, Search for solar axions using Li-7, Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 115016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.115016,hep-ex/0104035

    2001 arXiv

  80. [91]

    Derbin, S.V

    A.V. Derbin, S.V. Bakhlanov, A.I. Egorov, I.A. Mitropolsky, V.N. Muratova, et al., Search for Solar Axions Produced by Primakoff Conversion Using Resonant Absorption by Tm-169 Nuclei, Phys.Lett. B678 (2009) 181–185, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.06.016,0904.3443

    2009 arXiv

  81. [92]

    Bartram, et al

    C. Bartram, et al. (ADMX), Nonvirialized axion search sensitive to Doppler effects in the Milky Way halo, Phys. Rev. D 109 (8) (2024) 083014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083014,2311.07748

    2024 arXiv

  82. [93]

    Tim Schneemann, Kristof Schmieden, Matthias Schott, First results of the SUPAX Experiment: Probing Dark Photons, to appear (2023), 2308.08337

    2023 arXiv

  83. [94]

    Rettaroli, et al

    A. Rettaroli, et al. (QUAX), Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable haloscope, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2) (2024) 022008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.022008,2402.19063

    2024 arXiv

  84. [95]

    Brubaker, L

    B.M. Brubaker, L. Zhong, S.K. Lamoreaux, K.W. Lehnert, K.A. van Bibber, HAYSTAC axion search analysis procedure, Phys. Rev. D 96 (12) (2017) 123008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123008,1706.08388

    2017 arXiv

  85. [96]

    Palken, et al., Improved analysis framework for axion dark matter searches, Phys

    D.A. Palken, et al., Improved analysis framework for axion dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 101 (12) (2020) 123011, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.123011,2003.08510

    2020 arXiv

  86. [97]

    Savitzky, M

    Abraham. Savitzky, M. J. E. Golay, Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures., Anal. Chem. 36 (8) (1964) 1627–1639, doi:10.1021/ac60214a047

    1964 doi

  87. [98]

    Anastassopoulos, et al

    V. Anastassopoulos, et al. (CAST), New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction, Nature Phys. 13 (2017) 584–590, doi:10.1038/ nphys4109,1705.02290

    2017 arXiv

  88. [99]

    Paola Arias, Davide Cadamuro, Mark Goodsell, Joerg Jaeckel, Javier Redondo, Andreas Ringwald, WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP 1206 (2012) 013, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/013,1201.5902

    2012 arXiv

  89. [100]

    S. A. Abel, M. D. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze, A. Ringwald, Kinetic Mixing of the Photon with Hidden U(1)s in String Phenomenology, JHEP 07 (2008) 124, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/124,0803.1449

    2008 arXiv

  90. [101]

    Horns, M

    D. Horns, M. Meyer, Indications for a pair-production anomaly from the propagation of VHE gamma-rays, JCAP 1202 (2012) 033, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/033,1201.4711

    2012 arXiv

  91. [102]

    Suzuki, T

    J. Suzuki, T. Horie, Y . Inoue, M. Minowa, Experimental Search for Hidden Photon CDM in the eV mass range with a Dish Antenna, JCAP 09 (2015) 042, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/042,1504.00118

    2015 arXiv

  92. [103]

    Andrianavalomahefa, et al

    A. Andrianavalomahefa, et al. (FUNK Experiment), Limits from the Funk Experiment on the Mixing Strength of Hidden-Photon Dark Matter in the Visible and Near-Ultraviolet Wavelength Range, Phys. Rev. D 102 (4) (2020) 042001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.042001,2003.13144

    2020 arXiv

  93. [104]

    Millar, Ciaran A

    Andrea Caputo, Alexander J. Millar, Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, Edoardo Vitagliano, Dark photon limits: A handbook, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) (2021) 095029, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.095029,2105.04565

    2021 arXiv

  94. [105]

    Matthias Schwarz, Ernst-Axel Knabbe, Axel Lindner, Javier Redondo, Andreas Ringwald, Magnus Schneide, Jaroslaw Susol, G ¨unter Wiedemann, Results from the Solar Hidden Photon Search (SHIPS), JCAP 08 (2015) 011, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/011,1502. 04490

    2015 doi

  95. [106]

    Dror, Hitoshi Murayama, Nicholas L

    Jeff A. Dror, Hitoshi Murayama, Nicholas L. Rodd, Cosmic axion background, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 115004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103. 115004, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.115004

    2021 doi

  96. [107]

    Nitta, et al

    T. Nitta, et al. (ADMX), Search for a Dark-Matter-Induced Cosmic Axion Background with ADMX, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (10) (2023) 101002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.101002,2303.06282

    2023 arXiv

  97. [108]

    Nancy Aggarwal, et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev. Rel. 24 (1) (2021) 4, doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00032-5,2011.12414

    2021 arXiv

  98. [109]

    D37 (1988) 1237, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1237

    Georg Raffelt, Leo Stodolsky, Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles, Phys.Rev. D37 (1988) 1237, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1237

    1988 doi

  99. [110]

    Camilo Garc ´ıa-Cely, Andreas Ringwald, Complete Gravitational-Wave Spectrum of the Sun, to appear (2024),2407.18297

    2024 arXiv

  100. [111]

    Aldo Ejlli, Damian Ejlli, Adrian Mike Cruise, Giampaolo Pisano, Hartmut Grote, Upper limits on the amplitude of ultra-high-frequency gravitational waves from graviton to photon conversion, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (12) (2019) 1032, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7542-5,1908. 00232

    2019 doi

  101. [112]

    Claudio Gatti, Luca Visinelli, Michael Zantedeschi, Cavity detection of gravitational waves: Where do we stand?, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2) (2024) 023018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.023018,2403.18610

    2024 arXiv

  102. [113]

    Nancy Aggarwal, et al., Challenges and Opportunities of Gravitational Wave Searches above 10 kHz, to appear (2025),2501.11723

    2025

  103. [114]

    Kristof Schmieden, Matthias Schott, A Global Network of Cavities to Search for Gravitational Waves (GravNet): A novel scheme to hunt gravitational waves signatures from the early universe, PoS EPS-HEP2023 (2024) 102, doi:10.22323/1.449.0102,2308.11497

    2024 arXiv

  104. [115]

    Valerie Domcke, Sebastian A. R. Ellis, Nicholas L. Rodd, Magnets are Weber Bar Gravitational Wave Detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (23) (2025) 231401, doi:10.1103/966v-r5fm,2408.01483. Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions23

    2025 arXiv

  105. [116]

    Zhitnitsky, ’Nonbaryonic’ dark matter as baryonic colour superconductor, J

    A. Zhitnitsky, ’Nonbaryonic’ dark matter as baryonic colour superconductor, J. Phys. G 30 (2004) S513–S517, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/30/ 1/061

    2004 doi

  106. [117]

    Caspers, et al., Daily modulations and broadband strategy in axion searches: An application with the CAST -CAPP detector, Phys

    F . Caspers, et al., Daily modulations and broadband strategy in axion searches: An application with the CAST -CAPP detector, Phys. Rev. D 111 (8) (2025) 082009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.082009,2405.10972

    2025 arXiv

  107. [118]

    Junpu Wang, Lam Hui, Justin Khoury, No-Go Theorems for Generalized Chameleon Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 241301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.241301, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.241301

    2012 doi

  108. [119]

    Ahlers, A

    M. Ahlers, A. Lindner, A. Ringwald, L. Schrempp, C. Weniger, Alpenglow - A Signature for Chameleons in Axion-Like Particle Search Experiments, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.015018,0710.1555

    2008 arXiv

  109. [120]

    Rybka, M

    G. Rybka, M. Hotz, L. J Rosenberg, S. J. Asztalos, G. Carosi, C. Hagmann, D. Kinion, K. van Bibber, J. Hoskins, C. Martin, P . Sikivie, D. B. Tanner, R. Bradley, J. Clarke, Search for Chameleon Scalar Fields with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment, Physical Review Letters 105 (5...

    2010 doi

  110. [121]

    Arguedas Cuendis, et al., First Results on the Search for Chameleons with the KWISP Detector at CAST, Phys

    S. Arguedas Cuendis, et al., First Results on the Search for Chameleons with the KWISP Detector at CAST, Phys. Dark Univ. 26 (2019) 100367, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100367,1906.01084

    2019

  111. [122]

    Dark Univ

    David Alesini, et al., The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101370, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101370,2309.00351

    2023

  112. [123]

    Carenza, J

    P . Carenza, J. A. Garc´ıa Pascual, M. Giannotti, I. G. Irastorza, M. Kaltschmidt, A. Lella, A. Lindner, G. Lucente, A. Mirizzi, M. J. Puyuelo, Detecting Supernova Axions with IAXO, to appear (2025),2502.19476

    2025 arXiv

  113. [124]

    Shao-Feng Ge, Koichi Hamaguchi, Koichi Ichimura, Koji Ishidoshiro, Y oshiki Kanazawa, Y asuhiro Kishimoto, Natsumi Nagata, Jiaming Zheng, Supernova-scope for the Direct Search of Supernova Axions, JCAP 11 (2020) 059, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/059,2008. 03924

    2020 doi

  114. [125]

    E. et al. Armengaud, Physics potential of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO), JCAP 2019 (06) (2019) 047,1904.09155

    2019 arXiv

  115. [126]

    Jaeckel, L

    J. Jaeckel, L. J. Thormaehlen, Distinguishing Axion Models with IAXO, JCAP 2019 (03) (2019) 039,1811.09278

    2019 arXiv

  116. [127]

    L. et al. Di Luzio, Probing the axion–nucleon coupling with the next generation of axion helioscopes, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 120, 2111.06407

    2022 arXiv

  117. [128]

    T. et al. Dafni, Weighing the solar axion, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035037,1811.09290

    2019 arXiv

  118. [129]

    Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, Edoardo Vitagliano, Cornering the axion withCP-violating interactions, Phys. Rev. D 102 (11) (2020) 115026, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.115026,2010.03889

    2020 arXiv

  119. [130]

    S. et al. Hoof, Axion helioscopes as solar thermometers, JCAP 2023 (10) (2023) 024,2306.00077

    2023 arXiv

  120. [131]

    Jaeckel, L

    J. Jaeckel, L. J. Thormaehlen, Axions as a probe of solar metals, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123020,1908.10878

    2019 arXiv

  121. [132]

    S. et al. Hoof, Quantifying uncertainties in the solar axion flux and their impact on determining axion model parameters, JCAP 2021 (09) (2021) 006,2101.08789

    2021 arXiv

  122. [133]

    Robin B ¨ahre, et al., Any light particle search II —Technical Design Report, JINST 8 (2013) T09001, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/09/T09001, 1302.5647

    2013 arXiv

  123. [134]

    Sebastian Hoof, Joerg Jaeckel, Giuseppe Lucente, Ultimate light-shining-through-a-wall experiments to establish QCD axions as the dominant form of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 111 (1) (2025) 015003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.015003,2407.04772

    2025 arXiv

  124. [135]

    Thomas D. P . Edwards, Marco Chianese, Bradley J. Kavanagh, Samaya M. Nissanke, Christoph Weniger, Unique Multimessenger Signal of QCD Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 161101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.161101, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.161101

    2020 doi

  125. [136]

    Andrea Caputo, Georg Raffelt, Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition, PoS COSMICWISPers (2024) 041, doi:10.22323/1.454.0041, 2401.13728

    2024 arXiv

  126. [137]

    Notes Phys

    Richard Brito, Vitor Cardoso, Paolo Pani, Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Lect. Notes Phys. 906 (2015) pp.1–237, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6,1501.06570

    2015 arXiv

  127. [138]

    Antel, et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur

    C. Antel, et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (12) (2023) 1122, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-12168-5,2305.01715

    2023 arXiv

  128. [139]

    Beacham, et al., Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report, J

    J. Beacham, et al., Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report, J. Phys. G 47 (1) (2020) 010501, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab4cd2,1901.09966

    2020 arXiv

  129. [140]

    Jan Jerhot, Babette D ¨obrich, Fatih Ertas, Felix Kahlhoefer, Tommaso Spadaro, ALPINIST: Axion-Like Particles In Numerous Interactions Simulated and Tabulated, JHEP 07 (2022) 094, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)094,2201.05170

    2022 arXiv

  130. [141]

    Frank Wilczek, Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1549–1552, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1549

    1982 doi

  131. [142]

    Wali, Minimal flavor unification via multigenerational Peccei-Quinn Symmetry, Phys

    Aharon Davidson, Kameshwar C. Wali, Minimal flavor unification via multigenerational Peccei-Quinn Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 11, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.11

    1982 doi

  132. [143]

    (NA62), Search for a feebly interacting particleXin the decayK +→π +X, JHEP 03 (2021) 058, doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2021)058,2011.11329

    Eduardo Cortina Gil, et al. (NA62), Search for a feebly interacting particleXin the decayK +→π +X, JHEP 03 (2021) 058, doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2021)058,2011.11329

    2021 arXiv

  133. [144]

    Jorge Martin Camalich, Maxim Pospelov, Pham Ngoc Hoa Vuong, Robert Ziegler, Jure Zupan, Quark Flavor Phenomenology of the QCD Axion, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) (2020) 015023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.015023,2002.04623

    2020 arXiv

  134. [145]

    Ciaran O’Hare, cajohare/AxionLimits: AxionLimits,https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/2020, doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932430

    2020 doi

  135. [146]

    Alejandro ´Alvarez Melc ´on, et al., Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project, JCAP 1805 (05) (2018) 040, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2018/05/040,1803.01243

    2018 arXiv

  136. [147]

    Kim, Y annis K

    Junu Jeong, SungWoo Y oun, Saebyeok Ahn, Jihn E. Kim, Y annis K. Semertzidis, Concept of multiple-cell cavity for axion dark matter search, Phys. Lett. B 777 (2018) 412–419, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.066,1710.06969

    2018 arXiv

  137. [148]

    Quiskamp, Graeme R

    Aaron P . Quiskamp, Graeme R. Flower, Steven Samuels, Ben T. McAllister, Paul Altin, Eugene N. Ivanov, Maxim Goryachev, Michael E. Tobar, Near-quantum-limited axion dark matter search with the ORGAN experiment around 26µeV, Phys. Rev. D 111 (9) (2025) 095007, doi:10.1103/PhysR...

    2025 arXiv

  138. [149]

    Dieter Horns, Joerg Jaeckel, Axel Lindner, Andrei Lobanov, Javier Redondo, et al., Searching for WISPy Cold Dark Matter with a Dish Antenna, JCAP 1304 (2013) 016, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/04/016,1212.2970

    2013 arXiv

  139. [150]

    http://www.iexp.uni-hamburg.de/groups/astroparticle/brass/brassweb.htm

  140. [151]

    Brun, private communication

    P . Brun, private communication

  141. [152]

    Gabe Hoshino, et al., First Axion-Like Particle Results from a Broadband Search for Wave-Like Dark Matter in the 44 to 52µeV Range with a Coaxial Dish Antenna, to appear (2025),2501.17119

    2025 arXiv

  142. [153]

    Allen Caldwell, Gia Dvali, B ´ela Majorovits, Alexander Millar, Georg Raffelt, Javier Redondo, Olaf Reimann, Frank Simon, Frank Steffen (MADMAX Working Group), Dielectric Haloscopes: A New Way to Detect Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (9) (2017) 091801, doi:10.1103/Phy...

    2017 arXiv

  143. [154]

    Ary dos Santos Garcia, et al., First search for axion dark matter with a Madmax prototype, to appear (2024),2409.11777

    B. Ary dos Santos Garcia, et al., First search for axion dark matter with a Madmax prototype, to appear (2024),2409.11777. 24Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions

    2024 arXiv

  144. [155]

    Masha Baryakhtar, Junwu Huang, Robert Lasenby, Axion and hidden photon dark matter detection with multilayer optical haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (3) (2018) 035006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.035006,1803.11455

    2018 arXiv

  145. [156]

    Jeff Chiles, et al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (23) (2022) 231802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.231802,2110.01582

    2022 arXiv

  146. [157]

    David J. E. Marsh, Kin-Chung Fong, Erik W. Lentz, Liboˇr Smejkal, Mazhar N. Ali, Proposal to Detect Dark Matter using Axionic Topological Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (12) (2019) 121601, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.121601,1807.08810

    2019 arXiv

  147. [158]

    Jan Sch ¨utte-Engel, David J. E. Marsh, Alexander J. Millar, Akihiko Sekine, Francesca Chadha-Day, Sebastian Hoof, Mazhar N. Ali, Kin-Chung Fong, Edward Hardy, Libor ˇSmejkal, Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection, JCAP 08 (2021) 066, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2021...

    2021 arXiv

  148. [159]

    Millar, Matteo Pancaldi, Edoardo Vitagliano, Frank Wilczek, Tunable axion plasma haloscopes, Phys

    Matthew Lawson, Alexander J. Millar, Matteo Pancaldi, Edoardo Vitagliano, Frank Wilczek, Tunable axion plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (14) (2019) 141802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.141802,1904.11872

    2019 arXiv

  149. [160]

    Millar, et al

    Alexander J. Millar, et al. (ALPHA), Searching for dark matter with plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) (2023) 055013, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.055013,2210.00017

    2023 arXiv

  150. [161]

    535 (12) (2023) 2300326, doi:10.1002/andp.202300326,2306.17243

    Saiyd Ahyoune, et al., A Proposal for a Low-Frequency Axion Search in the 1–2µeV Range and Below with the BabyIAXO Magnet, Annalen Phys. 535 (12) (2023) 2300326, doi:10.1002/andp.202300326,2306.17243

    2023 arXiv

  151. [162]

    Chakrabarty, et al., Low frequency, 100–600 MHz, searches with axion cavity haloscopes, Phys

    S. Chakrabarty, et al., Low frequency, 100–600 MHz, searches with axion cavity haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D 109 (4) (2024) 042004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.042004,2303.07116

    2024 arXiv

  152. [163]

    Pierre Pugnat, et al., GrAHal-CAPP for axion dark matter search with unprecedented sensitivity in the 1–3µeV mass range, Front. in Phys. 12 (2024) 1358810, doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1358810

    2024

  153. [164]

    Yuka Oshima, Hiroki Fujimoto, Masaki Ando, Tomohiro Fujita, Yuta Michimura, Koji Nagano, Ippei Obata, Taihei Watanabe, Dark matter Axion search with riNg Cavity Experiment DANCE: Current sensitivity, in: 55th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation 2021, p. x,2105. 06252

    2021

  154. [165]

    Graham, Micah Ledbetter, Surjeet Rajendran, Alex Sushkov, Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr), Phys.Rev

    Dmitry Budker, Peter W. Graham, Micah Ledbetter, Surjeet Rajendran, Alex Sushkov, Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr), Phys.Rev. X4 (2014) 021030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021030,1306.6089

    2014 arXiv

  155. [166]

    Jackson Kimball, et al., Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr), Springer Proc

    Derek F . Jackson Kimball, et al., Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr), Springer Proc. Phys. 245 (2020) 105–121, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43761-9 13,1711.08999

    2020 arXiv

  156. [167]

    Barbieri, C

    R. Barbieri, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, C. S. Gallo, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, C. C. Speake, Searching for galactic axions through magnetized media: the QUAX proposal, Phys. Dark Univ. 15 (2017) 135–141, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2017.01.003,1606.02201

    2017 arXiv

  157. [168]

    Bloch, Gil Ronen, Roy Shaham, Ori Katz, Tomer Volansky, Or Katz (NASDUCK), New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a Floquet quantum detector, Sci

    Itay M. Bloch, Gil Ronen, Roy Shaham, Ori Katz, Tomer Volansky, Or Katz (NASDUCK), New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a Floquet quantum detector, Sci. Adv. 8 (5) (2022) abl8919, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8919,2105.04603

    2022 arXiv

  158. [169]

    Semertzidis, Axionlike dark matter search using the storage ring EDM method, Phys

    Seung Pyo Chang, Selcuk Haciomeroglu, On Kim, Soohyung Lee, Seongtae Park, Y annis K. Semertzidis, Axionlike dark matter search using the storage ring EDM method, Phys. Rev. D 99 (8) (2019) 083002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083002,1710.05271

    2019 arXiv

  159. [170]

    Sikivie, Axion Dark Matter Detection using Atomic Transitions, Phys

    P . Sikivie, Axion Dark Matter Detection using Atomic Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (20) (2014) 201301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113. 201301, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 125, 029901 (2020)],1409.2806

    2014 arXiv

  160. [171]

    L Santamaria, C Braggio, G Carugno, V Di Sarno, P Maddaloni, G Ruoso, Axion dark matter detection by laser spectroscopy of ultracold molecular oxygen: a proposal, New Journal of Physics 17 (11) (2015) 113025, URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/17/i=11/a= 113025

    2015

  161. [172]

    Braggio, et al., Axion dark matter detection by laser induced fluorescence in rare-earth doped materials, Sci

    C. Braggio, et al., Axion dark matter detection by laser induced fluorescence in rare-earth doped materials, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 15168, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15413-6,1707.06103

    2017 arXiv

  162. [173]

    Prateek Agrawal, et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 workshop report, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (11) (2021) 1015, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-021-09703-7,2102.12143

    2021 arXiv

  163. [174]

    Sikivie, N

    P . Sikivie, N. Sullivan, D.B. Tanner, Proposal for Axion Dark Matter Detection Using an LC Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (13) (2014) 131301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.131301,1310.8545

    2014 arXiv

  164. [175]

    Graham, Kent Irwin, Jeremy Mardon, Surjeet Rajendran, Yue Zhao, Radio for hidden-photon dark matter detection, Phys

    Saptarshi Chaudhuri, Peter W. Graham, Kent Irwin, Jeremy Mardon, Surjeet Rajendran, Yue Zhao, Radio for hidden-photon dark matter detection, Phys. Rev. D92 (7) (2015) 075012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.075012,1411.7382

    2015 arXiv

  165. [176]

    Safdi, Jesse Thaler, Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection, Phys

    Y onatan Kahn, Benjamin R. Safdi, Jesse Thaler, Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (14) (2016) 141801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.141801,1602.01086

    2016 arXiv

  166. [177]

    Maximiliano Silva-Feaver, et al., Design Overview of DM Radio Pathfinder Experiment, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27 (4) (2017) 1400204, doi:10.1109/TASC.2016.2631425,1610.09344

    2017

  167. [178]

    Ouellet, et al., First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub-µeV Axion Dark Matter, Phys

    Jonathan L. Ouellet, et al., First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub-µeV Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (12) (2019) 121802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.121802,1810.12257

    2019 arXiv

  168. [179]

    Salemi, et al., Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm, Phys

    Chiara P . Salemi, et al., Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (8) (2021) 081801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.081801,2102.06722

    2021 arXiv

  169. [180]

    Gramolin, Deniz Aybas, Dorian Johnson, Janos Adam, Alexander O

    Alexander V. Gramolin, Deniz Aybas, Dorian Johnson, Janos Adam, Alexander O. Sushkov, Search for axion-like dark matter with ferro- magnets, Nature Phys. 17 (1) (2021) 79–84, doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1006-6,2003.03348

    2021 arXiv

  170. [181]

    McAllister, Maxim Goryachev, Jeremy Bourhill, Eugene N

    Ben T. McAllister, Maxim Goryachev, Jeremy Bourhill, Eugene N. Ivanov, Michael E. Tobar, Broadband Axion Dark Matter Haloscopes via Electric Sensing, to appear (2018),1803.07755

    2018 arXiv

  171. [182]

    Jonathan Ouellet, Zachary Bogorad, Solutions to Axion Electrodynamics in Various Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 99 (5) (2019) 055010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.055010,1809.10709

    2019 arXiv

  172. [183]

    Marc Beutter, Andreas Pargner, Thomas Schwetz, Elisa Todarello, Axion-electrodynamics: a quantum field calculation, JCAP 02 (2019) 026, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/026,1812.05487

    2019 arXiv

  173. [184]

    Crisosto, P

    N. Crisosto, P . Sikivie, N.S. Sullivan, D.B. Tanner, J. Y ang, G. Rybka, ADMX SLIC: Results from a SuperconductingLCCircuit Investigating Cold Axions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (24) (2020) 241101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.241101,1911.05772

    2020 arXiv

  174. [185]

    Devlin, et al., Constraints on the Coupling between Axionlike Dark Matter and Photons Using an Antiproton Superconducting Tuned Detection Circuit in a Cryogenic Penning Trap, Phys

    Jack A. Devlin, et al., Constraints on the Coupling between Axionlike Dark Matter and Photons Using an Antiproton Superconducting Tuned Detection Circuit in a Cryogenic Penning Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (4) (2021) 041301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041301,2101.11290

    2021 arXiv

  175. [186]

    Caves, Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers, Phys

    Carlton M. Caves, Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1817–1839, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817

    1982 doi

  176. [187]

    H. A. Haus, J. A. Mullen, Quantum Noise in Linear Amplifiers, Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2407–2413, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2407, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.128.2407

    1962 doi

  177. [188]

    Lamoreaux, K.A

    S.K. Lamoreaux, K.A. van Bibber, K.W. Lehnert, G. Carosi, Analysis of single-photon and linear amplifier detectors for microwave cavity dark matter axion searches, Phys.Rev. D88 (3) (2013) 035020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.035020,1306.3591

    2013 arXiv

  178. [189]

    Malnou, D.A

    M. Malnou, D.A. Palken, B.M. Brubaker, Leila R. Vale, Gene C. Hilton, K.W. Lehnert, Squeezed vacuum used to accelerate the search for a weak classical signal, Phys. Rev. X 9 (2) (2019) 021023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021023, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 10, 039902 (2020)], Experiments ...

    2019 arXiv

  179. [190]

    Zhu et al

    Y . Zhu et al. (HAYSTAC Collaboration), Dark Matter Axion Search with HAYSTAC Phase II, arXiv preprint (2024),2409.08998, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08998

    2024 arXiv

  180. [191]

    Y amamoto, et al., The Rydberg atom cavity axion search, in: 3rd International Heidelberg Conference on Dark Matter in Astro and Particle Physics 2000, pp

    K. Y amamoto, et al., The Rydberg atom cavity axion search, in: 3rd International Heidelberg Conference on Dark Matter in Astro and Particle Physics 2000, pp. 638–645,hep-ph/0101200

    2000 arXiv

  181. [192]

    thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy 2024, doctoral Program in Metrology, Supervisor: Dr

    Carlo Pepe, Development of Superconducting Single-Particle Detector Transition-Edge Sensor, Ph.d. thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy 2024, doctoral Program in Metrology, Supervisor: Dr. M. Rajteri, URLhttps://tesidottorato.depositolegale.it/bitstream/ 20.500.14242/170...

    2024

  182. [193]

    Federico Paolucci, Francesco Giazotto, GHz Superconducting Single-Photon Detectors for Dark Matter Search, Instruments 5 (2) (2021) 14, doi:10.3390/instruments5020014,2101.08558

    2021 arXiv

  183. [194]

    thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara 2024, URLhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/5m22t48n

    Jennifer Pearl Smith, Scaling Energy-Resolving Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detector Readout, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara 2024, URLhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/5m22t48n

    2024

  184. [195]

    Huang, E.G

    B. Huang, E.G. Arnault, W. Jung, C. Fried, et al., Graphene calorimetric single-photon detector, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22433 (2024), URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22433

    2024 arXiv

  185. [196]

    Natarajan, Michael G

    Chandrasekara M. Natarajan, Michael G. Tanner, Robert H. Hadfield, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications, Superconductor Science and Technology 25 (6) (2012) 063001, doi:10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001, URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-2048/2...

    2012 doi

  186. [197]

    Flurin, R

    E. Flurin, R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, P . Bertet, D. Vion, D. Esteve, Detecting spins by their fluorescence with a microwave photon counter, Nature 599 (2021) 62–67, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04076-z

    2021 doi

  187. [198]

    Dixit, Srivatsan Chakram, Kevin He, Ankur Agrawal, Ravi K

    Akash V. Dixit, Srivatsan Chakram, Kevin He, Ankur Agrawal, Ravi K. Naik, David I. Schuster, Aaron Chou, Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (14) (2021) 141302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141302,2008.12231

    2021 arXiv

  188. [199]

    Braggio, et al., Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter, Phys

    C. Braggio, et al., Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter, Phys. Rev. X 15 (2) (2025) 021031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021031,2403.02321

    2025 arXiv

  189. [200]

    Semertzidis, Biaxially Textured YBa2Cu3O7−x Microwave Cavity in a High Magnetic Field for a Dark-Matter Axion Search, Phys

    Danho Ahn, Ohjoon Kwon, Woohyun Chung, Wonjun Jang, Doyu Lee, Jhinhwan Lee, Sung Woo Y oun, Heesu Byun, Dojun Y oum, Y annis K. Semertzidis, Biaxially Textured YBa2Cu3O7−x Microwave Cavity in a High Magnetic Field for a Dark-Matter Axion Search, Phys. Rev. Applied 17 (6) (2022...

    2022 arXiv

  190. [201]

    Golm, et al., Thin Film (High Temperature) Superconducting Radiofrequency Cavities for the Search of Axion Dark Matter, IEEE Trans

    J. Golm, et al., Thin Film (High Temperature) Superconducting Radiofrequency Cavities for the Search of Axion Dark Matter, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 32 (4) (2022) 1500605, doi:10.1109/TASC.2022.3147741,2110.01296

    2022

  191. [202]

    Artur Romanov, Patrick Krkoti ´c, Guilherme Telles, Joan O’Callaghan, Montse Pont, Francis Perez, Xavier Granados, Sergio Calatroni, Teresa Puig, Joffre Gutierrez, High frequency response of thick REBCO coated conductors in the framework of the FCC study, Sci. Rep. 10 (1) (202...

    2020 doi

  192. [203]

    Kristof Schmieden, Tim Schneemann, Matthias Schott, Malavika Unni, Hendrik Bekker, Arne Wickenbrock, Dmitry Budker, Study of NbN as superconducting material for the usage in superconducting radio frequency cavities, to appear (2024),2412.14958

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.