Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Balanced multi-species spin glasses

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Balanced spin glasses match single-species free energy

desk verdict Clean, genuinely new lower bound for balanced multi-species spin glasses, with a real payoff for tensor injective norms; the written proof has one honest gap on the Ising positivity principle that a referee can push them to fill. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06522 v2 pith:GYLHSJZ2 submitted 2025-07-09 math.PR cond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.MP

Erik Bates , Youngtak Sohn This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRcond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.MP MSC 60K3560G1582B4482D30
keywords multi-speciesspinglassbalancedmodelsfreeenergylowerboundgroundstateParisiformulaGaussianrandomtensorsinjectivenormIsingandspherical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper identifies a family of multi-species spin glass models, called balanced models, in which the species proportions exactly compensate the interaction strengths among species. For these models it proves that the limiting free energy is bounded below by the free energy of a single-species model whose $p$-spin inverse temperature $\beta_p$ is the variance of the $p$-spin component of the multi-species Hamiltonian; the same inequality holds for the ground state energy. This lower bound needs no convexity assumption and covers both Ising and spherical configurations, so it reaches models such as the bipartite SK model where standard convexity-based upper bounds fail. In several regimes the bound is shown to be an equality: at high temperature, for convex covariance functions, and at zero temperature for pure bipartite spherical models, which in turn yields the exact asymptotic injective norm of nonsymmetric Gaussian tensors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the balanced condition (H3): for $p=1$, $\Delta^2_t$ is independent of $t$; for $p\ge 2$, $\sum_{s_2,\dots,s_p}\Delta^2_{t,s_2,\dots,s_p}\lambda_{s_2}\cdots\lambda_{s_p}$ is independent of $t$. This makes the AM-GM inequality yield Proposition 3.4: the covariance of a carefully chosen decoupled comparison model dominates, on $[0,1]^S$, the multi-species covariance, while agreeing at $x=\mathbf{1}$. The proof also uses a multi-species positivity principle, guaranteeing that Gibbs overlaps are asymptotically nonnegative, to pass from $[-1,1]^S$ to $[0,1]^S$ in the comparison bound (3.2a). The numbers $\beta_p$ are then the single-species inverse temperatures of the comparison model.

What would settle it

Compute the low-temperature free energy of the balanced bipartite Ising SK model (equal species, only cross-species two-spin interaction) and compare it with the single-species SK free energy at inverse temperature $\beta$ with $\beta^2 = 2\Delta^2\lambda_1\lambda_2$; a value strictly below the single-species limit would falsify Theorem 1.3, and a numerical violation of asymptotic overlap nonnegativity would falsify the imported positivity principle.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a variance-matching principle for balanced multi-species spin glasses. For any species-proportion vector $\lambda$ and interaction array $\Delta$ satisfying the balanced condition (H3), define $\beta_p^2 = \sum_{s_1,\dots,s_p} \Delta^2_{s_1\dots s_p}\lambda_{s_1}\cdots\lambda_{s_p}$. Theorem 1.3 states that for both Ising and spherical configuration spaces, $\liminf_{N\to\infty} F_N(\Delta,\lambda_N) \ge \lim_{N\to\infty} F^{\mathrm{single}}_N(\beta)$, with the analogous statement for ground state energies. The proof obtains this by comparing the multi-species model to a species-decoupled single-species model, showing through the AM-GM inequality that the multi-species covariance is pointwise bounded above by the single-species covariance on the positive orthant, so the error in the one-sided interpolation bound has a definite sign. The paper then exhibits matching upper bounds in several cases, making the inequality an equality and producing new limit theorems for free energies, ground state energies, and tensor injective norms.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on a positivity principle for multi-species Ising models—that Gibbs overlaps between two replicas are asymptotically nonnegative—which the paper imports from prior work and says follows by trivial notational changes rather than proving in detail; if that principle fails, the central comparison bound collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At high temperature, the balanced multi-species free energy equals the single-species free energy whenever the corresponding single-species model is in its high-temperature phase (Corollary 2.1).
  • For convex covariance functions, equality of free energies and ground state energies holds at all temperatures, reducing multi-species variational formulas to the classical single-species Parisi formula (Corollary 2.2).
  • For balanced pure bipartite spherical models, the ground state energy equals the single-species pure $p$-spin ground state energy, up to the variance-matching factor (Corollary 2.7).
  • The injective norm of an order-$p$ Gaussian tensor with independent standard normal entries is asymptotically $\sqrt{p}\,E_0(p)\,\sqrt{d}$ almost surely, confirming that a known upper bound is sharp (Corollary 2.11).
  • Because the lower bound does not require convexity, it applies to nonconvex models such as the bipartite SK model, where standard convexity-based upper bounds are believed to be incorrect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same variance-matching comparison may transfer to other inhomogeneous disordered systems, such as multi-species inference or constraint-satisfaction problems, whenever the interaction matrix has constant species-averaged row sums.
  • If the equality cases are as broad as the authors suspect (they report no counterexample), the balanced condition could be the natural structural hypothesis for a full single-species-type Parisi formula in nonconvex multi-species models.
  • The tensor injective norm result suggests that for nonsymmetric Gaussian tensors the ground-state statistics are asymptotically indistinguishable from a symmetrized single-species $p$-spin model, which could inform algorithmic thresholds for tensor PCA and related optimization.
  • A numerical check on the balanced bipartite Ising SK model at low temperature, comparing its free energy with the variance-matched single-species value, would give direct evidence on whether the lower bound is sharp in nonconvex cases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a class of multi-species spin glass models, called balanced models, in which the species proportions equalize the species-dependent interaction strengths (condition (H3)). For these models it proves a lower bound for the free energy and ground state energy in terms of a single-species model whose p-spin inverse temperature parameter beta_p is exactly the variance of the p-spin component of the multi-species Hamiltonian. The proof combines an interpolation-type comparison between multi-species and auxiliary single-species models (Proposition 3.1), an AM-GM inequality (Proposition 3.4), and a multi-species Talagrand positivity principle (Lemma 3.2). The paper then derives equality cases at high temperature, in the convex regime, for balanced pure bipartite spherical ground state energies, and for the injective norm of real Gaussian tensors.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a valuable result: it gives a parameter-free lower bound that bypasses both the convexity assumption usually needed for upper bounds and the complicated multi-species Parisi functional needed for lower bounds. The definition of beta_p in (1.13) is natural and not fitted; the single-species model is a benchmark, not an input. The applications are substantial and include a new limit theorem for the injective norm of nonsymmetric Gaussian tensors that matches the upper bound of Dartois and McKenna. The AM-GM computation in Proposition 3.4 is clean, and the spherical case of the main theorem is backed by the authors' earlier work [16]. The paper is well written and gives explicit credit to related work by Issa and others. The main caveat is that the Ising case of the central positivity principle and of the convex upper bound is asserted by adaptation rather than proved.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Lemma 3.2(e) and Proposition 3.1] Lemma 3.2(e) is stated for both Ising and spherical configurations, but the proof of part (e) only cites [16, Lemma 3.3], which the paper itself identifies as a spherical result, and adds that the Ising case follows after trivial notational changes. This is load-bearing: inequality (3.2a) in Proposition 3.1 is used at (3.27) with eDelta = Delta, and its sign matters for the main lower bound. The derivative bound (3.12) controls the overlap event {R_s <= -epsilon} precisely through Lemma 3.2(e), so without a valid Ising version the Ising half of Theorem 1.3 is unsupported. The citation to [42, Lemma 7.5] does not, on its face, cover non-exchangeable species ratios in an Ising mixed p-spin model. Please provide a complete proof of Lemma 3.2(e) for the Ising case, or a precise citation that covers exactly this setting.
  2. [Section 4.1, Remark 4.3 and Proposition 4.2] The convex-case upper bound (4.7) is used to prove Corollary 2.2 and its ground-state counterpart (2.6). For the Ising case, Remark 4.3 concedes that [59, Theorem 1] treats only the SK model and that the mixed p-spin bound follows by adaptation, using the same multi-species positivity principle whose Ising proof is missing. Thus the Ising half of Corollary 2.2 inherits the gap identified in the previous comment. Please supply the adapted Guerra-interpolation argument for the Ising mixed p-spin multi-species upper bound under convexity on [0,1]^S, or cite a result that provides it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 3.3, equations (3.19) and (3.20)] The four limits written as alpha -> 0 in (3.19) and (3.20) should be alpha -> infinity; the displayed statement (3.13) uses alpha -> infinity, so this appears to be a typographical error, but it should be corrected because it makes the proof of this standard lemma hard to follow.
  2. [Equation (3.21) and Proposition 3.4] The auxiliary interaction array defined in (3.21) is not visually distinguished from the original Delta in the plain text: for example, the equality xi_{infty,Delta}(1) = xi_{infty,Delta}(1) in Proposition 3.4 is unreadable without an overline or tilde. Please ensure the notation is rendered distinctly in the final version.
  3. [Corollary 2.7] In (2.13), the right-hand side depends on N, but the left-hand limit is over n. Please write the right-hand side as lim_{N -> infinity} GSE^single_{N,spherical}(beta), or make the dependence on n explicit, to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Remark 4.3] There is a typo in the sentence 'the upper bound free the mixed p-spin model'; it should read 'the upper bound for the mixed p-spin model'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the only flagged concern is a deferred Ising proof that is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

No circularity is present in the derivation chain. The comparison parameter beta in (1.13) is defined as the variance of the p-spin component of the multi-species Hamiltonian independently of the single-species benchmark, and Theorem 1.3 proves an inequality rather than fitting the benchmark. The key step, Proposition 3.4, uses only the balanced condition (H3) and AM-GM to show xi_infinity,Delta(x) <= xi_infinity,tilde-Delta(x) on [0,1]^S, which is a genuine mathematical input, not a restatement of the target result. Proposition 3.1 is derived from standard Gaussian interpolation and the multi-species positivity principle, and the matching upper bounds in the applications come from independent external works (e.g. [59], [7], [49], [29]) or from the single-species Parisi formula. The one substantive caveat, located in the proof of Lemma 3.2, is that part (e) is stated for both Ising and spherical configurations but the Ising case is deferred with the sentence "our proof simply defers to [16]; while that paper treats the spherical case, the argument also works in the Ising case after trivial notational changes." This is an omitted proof or missing support for the Ising half of the theorem, but it is not an equation-level reduction of the claim to its own input and therefore does not constitute circularity under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on assumptions (H1), (H2), (H3) and on several published theorems: the multi-species positivity principle [16, 42], single-species Parisi formulas [73, 58, 72, 26], and upper bounds from complexity [49, 29]. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Species proportions converge: lambda_{s,N} -> lambda_s > 0 for each s (H1).
    Standard hypothesis in multi-species spin glasses; used throughout to define the model and the limit.
  • domain assumption Decay condition on interaction coefficients (H2): the sum over p of (1+eps)^p times the expectation-like sum of Delta^2 lambda products is finite.
    Ensures the infinite-sum Hamiltonian is well-defined and xi_N converges uniformly to xi.
  • domain assumption Balanced condition (H3): Delta^2_t is independent of t for p=1, and the sum over s2...sp of Delta^2_{t,s2,...,sp} lambda_{s2}...lambda_{sp} is independent of t for p at least 2.
    Defines the special class of models for which the main theorem holds; used in Proposition 3.4 through the AM-GM inequality.
  • standard math Multi-species Talagrand positivity principle, Lemma 3.2(e), imported from [16] and also used in [42].
    A published theorem from prior work; it is the key input that controls negative overlaps and yields the one-sided comparison in Proposition 3.1.
  • standard math Single-species Parisi formula and convergence of F_single_N(beta), cited from [73, 58, 72, 26].
    Provides the limit appearing on the right-hand side of (1.12) and is used in the applications.
  • standard math Upper bounds for ground state energy of bipartite spherical models [49, 29] and for the injective norm of Gaussian tensors [29].
    These external upper bounds are combined with the lower bound to produce equalities in Corollaries 2.7 and 2.11.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Balanced multi-species spin glasses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GYLHSJZ2

@misc{pith2026250706522,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Balanced multi-species spin glasses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GYLHSJZ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06522}
}
abstract

We identify a special class of multi-species spin glass models: ones in which the species proportions serve to ''balance'' out the interaction strengths. For this class, we prove a free energy lower bound that does not require any convexity assumption, and applies to both Ising and spherical models. The lower bound is the free energy of a single-species model whose $p$-spin inverse-temperature parameter is exactly the variance of the $p$-spin component of the multi-species Hamiltonian. For the Ising case, this generalizes an inequality recently found by Issa in the context of vector spin models. We further demonstrate that this lower bound is actually an equality in many cases, including: at high temperatures for all models, at all temperatures for convex models, and at zero temperature for pure bipartite spherical models. When translated to a statement about the injective norm of a nonsymmetric Gaussian tensor, our lower bound matches an upper bound recently established by Dartois and McKenna.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Norm Bounds for Sparse Random Tensors and Spectral Gap of Random Hypergraphs

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    r-uniform Erdős-Rényi hypergraphs exhibit a spectral gap at m ≫ n^{r/2}, proved via an explicit selector process decomposition that also yields sparse tensor norm bounds and a tensor analogue of Seginer's theorem.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [16]

    Bates, E., and Sohn, Y.Free energy in multi-species mixed p-spin spherical models.Electron. J. Probab. 27(2022), article no. 52, 75 pp. https://doi.org/10.1214/22-ejp780. 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 23, 24

    work page doi:10.1214/22-ejp780 2022

  2. [42]

    Issa, V.Existence and Uniqueness of Permutation-Invariant Optimizers for Parisi Formula. 2024. Preprint, version 1.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.13846. 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 15, 21, 28 [43]Jagannath, A., Ko, J., and Sen, S.Maxκ-cut and the inhomogeneous Potts spin glass.Ann. Appl. Probab. 28, 3 (2018), 1536–1572.https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AAP1337. 2

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.13846 2018

  3. [1]

    L., and Ruelle, D.Some rigorous results on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass model.Comm

    Aizenman, M., Lebowitz, J. L., and Ruelle, D.Some rigorous results on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass model.Comm. Math. Phys. 112, 1 (1987), 3–20.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01217677. 9

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01217677 1987

  4. [2]

    L.Extended variational principle for the Sherrington- Kirkpatrick spin-glass model.Phys

    Aizenman, M., Sims, R., and Starr, S. L.Extended variational principle for the Sherrington- Kirkpatrick spin-glass model.Phys. Rev. B 68(Dec 2003), 214403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 68.214403. 2

    doi:10.1103/physrevb 2003

  5. [3]

    Auffinger, A., Ben Arous, G., and ˇCern´y, J.Random Matrices and Complexity of Spin Glasses. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 66, 2 (2013), 165–201.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21422. 12, 13

    doi:10.1002/cpa.21422 2013

  6. [4]

    Auffinger, A., and Chen, W.-K.Free Energy and Complexity of Spherical Bipartite Models.J. Stat. Phys. 157, 1 (2014), 40–59.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1073-0. 2, 11

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-014-1073-0 2014

  7. [5]

    Auffinger, A., and Chen, W.-K.The Parisi Formula has a Unique Minimizer.Comm. Math. Phys. 335, 3 (2015), 1429–1444.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2254-z. 10

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2254-z 2015

  8. [6]

    Auffinger, A., and Chen, W.-K.Parisi formula for the ground state energy in the mixed p-spin model.Ann. Probab. 45, 6B (2017), 4617–4631.https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOP1173. 9

    work page doi:10.1214/16-aop1173 2017

Show all 78 references
  1. [7]

    O.Free energy of bipartite spherical Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model.Ann

    Baik, J., and Lee, J. O.Free energy of bipartite spherical Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 56, 4 (2020), 2897–2934.https://doi.org/10.1214/20-AIHP1062. 2, 10, 11

    2020 doi

  2. [8]

    S., Gopi, S., Jiang, H., Lucca, K., and Rothvoss, T.A Geometric Perspective on the Injective Norm of Sums of Random Tensors

    Bandeira, A. S., Gopi, S., Jiang, H., Lucca, K., and Rothvoss, T.A Geometric Perspective on the Injective Norm of Sums of Random Tensors. 2024. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2411.10633. 12

    2024 doi arXiv

  3. [9]

    Rigorous Results.Ann

    Barra, A., Contucci, P., Mingione, E., and Tantari, D.Multi-Species Mean Field Spin Glasses. Rigorous Results.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 16, 3 (2015), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00023-014-0341-5. 9

    2015

  4. [10]

    Barra, A., Galluzzi, A., Guerra, F., Pizzoferrato, A., and Tantari, D.Mean field bipartite spin models treated with mechanical techniques.Eur. Phys. J. B 87, 3 (2014), Art. 74, 13. https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2014-40952-4. 2

    2014 doi

  5. [11]

    Barra, A., Genovese, G., and Guerra, F.Equilibrium statistical mechanics of bipartite spin systems.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 24 (2011), 245002, 22. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/ 44/24/245002. 2, 7 29

    2011 doi

  6. [12]

    Updated arXiv version.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.03215

    Bates, E., Sloman, L., and Sohn, Y.Replica symmetry breaking in multi-species Sherrington– Kirkpatrick model. Updated arXiv version.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.03215. 7

    doi arXiv

  7. [13]

    Bates, E., Sloman, L., and Sohn, Y.Replica Symmetry Breaking in Multi-Species Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model.J. Stat. Phys. 174, 2 (2019), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10955-018-2197-4. 9

    2019

  8. [14]

    Updated arXiv version.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.14790

    Bates, E., and Sohn, Y.Free energy in multi-species mixed p-spin spherical models. Updated arXiv version.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.14790. 7

    doi arXiv

  9. [15]

    Bates, E., and Sohn, Y.Crisanti–Sommers Formula and Simultaneous Symmetry Breaking in Multi- species Spherical Spin Glasses.Comm. Math. Phys. 394, 3 (2022), 1101–1152. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00220-022-04421-x. 2

    2022

  10. [17]

    Bates, E., and Sohn, Y.Parisi Formula for Balanced Potts Spin Glass.Comm. Math. Phys. 405, 10 (2024), article no. 228, 68 pp.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-024-05100-9. 2, 3

    2024 doi

  11. [18]

    T.Injective norm of random tensors with independent entries

    Boedihardjo, M. T.Injective norm of random tensors with independent entries. 2024. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.21193. 12

    2024 doi arXiv

  12. [19]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013

    Boucheron, S., Lugosi, G., and Massart, P.Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199535255.001.0001. 7

    2013

  13. [20]

    Bovier, A., and Klimovsky, A.The Aizenman-Sims-Starr and Guerra’s schemes for the SK model with multidimensional spins.Electron. J. Probab. 14(2009), article no. 8, 161–241. https://doi.org/ 10.1214/EJP.v14-611. 10

    2009 doi

  14. [21]

    Chen, H.-B.On free energy of non-convex multi-species spin glasses. 2024. Preprint. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2411.13342. 2, 3

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [22]

    Chen, H.-B.On Parisi measures of Potts spin glasses with correction.Electron. Commun. Probab. 29 (2024), article no. 35, 13 pp.https://doi.org/10.1214/24-ECP608. 2

    2024 doi

  16. [23]

    Chen, H.-B.Envelope presentation of Hamilton–Jacobi equations from spin glasses. 2025. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.20610. 2

    2025 doi arXiv

  17. [24]

    Chen, H.-B., and Issa, V.Uniqueness of Parisi measures for enriched convex vector spin glass. 2025. Preprint.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.15818. 10

    2025 doi arXiv

  18. [25]

    Chen, H.-B., and Mourrat, J.-C.On the free energy of vector spin glasses with nonconvex interactions. Probab. Math. Phys. 6, 1 (2025), 1–80.https://doi.org/10.2140/pmp.2025.6.1. 2, 7

    2025 doi

  19. [26]

    Electron

    Chen, W.-K.The Aizenman-Sims-Starr scheme and Parisi formula for mixed p-spin spherical models. Electron. J. Probab. 18(2013), article no. 94, 14 pp. https://doi.org/10.1214/EJP.v18-2580. 2, 9, 10, 11, 24

    2013 doi

  20. [27]

    Chen, W.-K., and Sen, A.Parisi Formula, Disorder Chaos and Fluctuation for the Ground State Energy in the Spherical Mixed p-Spin Models.Comm. Math. Phys. 350, 1 (2017), 129–173. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00220-016-2808-3. 9, 12, 18

    2017 doi

  21. [28]

    Crisanti, A., and Sommers, H.-J.The spherical p-spin interaction spin glass model: the statics.Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 87, 3 (Oct 1992), 341–354.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01309287. 10

    1992 doi

  22. [29]

    Dartois, S., and McKenna, B.Injective norm of real and complex random tensors I: From spin glasses to geometric entanglement. 2024. Preprint, version 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.03627. 1, 3, 12, 13, 28 [30]Dartois, S., and McKenna, B.2025. In preparation. 13, 28

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    S., and Wu, Q.Fluctuation Results for Multi-species Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model in the Replica Symmetric Regime.J

    Dey, P. S., and Wu, Q.Fluctuation Results for Multi-species Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model in the Replica Symmetric Regime.J. Stat. Phys. 185, 3 (2021), article no. 22, 40 pp. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10955-021-02835-w. 9

    2021

  24. [32]

    2024, vi+361.https://doi.org/10.4171/zlam/32

    Dominguez, T., and Mourrat, J.-C.Statistical Mechanics of Mean-Field Disordered Systems: A Hamilton–Jacobi Approach. 2024, vi+361.https://doi.org/10.4171/zlam/32. 2

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    El Alaoui, A., Montanari, A., and Sellke, M.Optimization of mean-field spin glasses.Ann. Probab. 49, 6 (2021), 2922–2960.https://doi.org/10.1214/21-aop1519. 10

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Elderfield, D., and Sherrington, D.The curious case of the Potts spin glass.J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 16, 15 (May 1983), L497–L503.https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/16/15/003. 2

    1983 doi

  27. [35]

    Genovese, G.A Remark on the Spherical Bipartite Spin Glass.Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 25, 2 (2022), article no. 14, 10 pp.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11040-022-09426-5. 11 30

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    Genovese, G., and Tantari, D.Legendre equivalences of spherical Boltzmann machines.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 9 (2020), 094001, 18.https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab6b92. 10, 11

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Towards Parisi ultrametricity.J

    Ghirlanda, S., and Guerra, F.General properties of overlap probability distributions in disordered spin systems. Towards Parisi ultrametricity.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 46 (1998), 9149–9155. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/46/006. 2

    1998 doi

  30. [38]

    Guerra, F.Broken Replica Symmetry Bounds in the Mean Field Spin Glass Model.Comm. Math. Phys. 233, 1 (2003), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-002-0773-5. 2

    2003 doi

  31. [39]

    2023, 88 pp

    Huang, B., and Sellke, M.Algorithmic Threshold for Multi-Species Spherical Spin Glasses. 2023, 88 pp. Preprint.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12172. 10

    2023 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    Huang, B., and Sellke, M.A Constructive Proof of the Spherical Parisi Formula. 2023. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.15495. 9

    2023 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Huang, B., and Sellke, M.Optimization Algorithms for Multi-species Spherical Spin Glasses.J. Stat. Phys. 191, 2 (2024), article no. 29, 42 pp.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-024-03242-7. 10

    2024 doi

  34. [44]

    Jagannath, A., and Tobasco, I.A dynamic programming approach to the Parisi functional.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144, 7 (2016), 3135–3150.https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/12968. 10

    2016 doi

  35. [45]

    Jagannath, A., and Tobasco, I.Low Temperature Asymptotics of Spherical Mean Field Spin Glasses. Comm. Math. Phys. 352, 3 (2017), 979–1017.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-017-2864-3. 9

    2017 doi

  36. [46]

    Kivimae, P.The Ground State Energy and Concentration of Complexity in Spherical Bipartite Models. Comm. Math. Phys. 403, 1 (2023), 37–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04733-6. 12

    2023 doi

  37. [47]

    Ko, J.Free energy of multiple systems of spherical spin glasses with constrained overlaps.Electron. J. Probab. 25(2020), article no. 28, 34 pp.https://doi.org/10.1214/20-ejp431. 2

    2020 doi

  38. [48]

    M., Thouless, D

    Kosterlitz, J. M., Thouless, D. J., and Jones, R. C.Spherical Model of a Spin-Glass.Phys. Rev. Lett. 36(May 1976), 1217–1220.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1217. 10

    1976 doi

  39. [49]

    McKenna, B.Complexity of bipartite spherical spin glasses.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 60, 1 (2024), 636–657.https://doi.org/10.1214/22-aihp1327. 3, 11, 12, 26

    2024 doi

  40. [50]

    Mourrat, J.-C.Nonconvex interactions in mean-field spin glasses.Probab. Math. Phys. 2, 2 (2021), 281–339.https://doi.org/10.2140/pmp.2021.2.281. 2

    2021 doi

  41. [51]

    Mourrat, J.-C.The Parisi formula is a Hamilton–Jacobi equation in Wasserstein space.Canad. J. Math. 74, 3 (2022), 607–629.https://doi.org/10.4153/s0008414x21000031. 2

    2022 doi

  42. [52]

    Mourrat, J.-C.Free energy upper bound for mean-field vector spin glasses.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 59, 3 (2023), 1143–1182.https://doi.org/10.1214/22-aihp1292. 2, 8

    2023 doi

  43. [53]

    Mourrat, J.-C.Color symmetry breaking in the Potts spin glass.ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 22, 1 (2025), 651–655.https://doi.org/10.30757/alea.v22-25. 3

    2025 doi

  44. [54]

    H., Drineas, P., and Tran, T

    Nguyen, N. H., Drineas, P., and Tran, T. D.Tensor sparsification via a bound on the spectral norm of random tensors.Inf. Inference 4, 3 (2015), 195–229.https://doi.org/10.1093/imaiai/iav004. 12

    2015 doi

  45. [55]

    Panchenko, D.A note on Talagrand’s positivity principle.Electron. Commun. Probab. 12(2007), 401–410.https://doi.org/10.1214/ECP.v12-1326. 7

    2007 doi

  46. [56]

    Panchenko, D.The Parisi ultrametricity conjecture.Ann. of Math. 177, 1 (2013), 383–393. https: //doi.org/10.4007/annals.2013.177.1.8. 2

    2013 doi

  47. [57]

    Springer Monographs in Mathematics

    Panchenko, D.The Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6289-7. 16

    2013 doi

  48. [58]

    Panchenko, D.The Parisi formula for mixed p-spin models.Ann. Probab. 42, 3 (2014), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOP800. 2, 9, 24

    2014 doi

  49. [59]

    Panchenko, D.The free energy in a multi-species Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model.Ann. Probab. 43, 6 (2015), 3494–3513.https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOP967. 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 23, 24

    2015 doi

  50. [60]

    Panchenko, D.Free energy in the mixed p-spin models with vector spins.Ann. Probab. 46, 2 (2018), 865–896.https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOP1194. 2

    2018 doi

  51. [61]

    Panchenko, D.Free energy in the Potts spin glass.Ann. Probab. 46, 2 (2018), 829–864. https: //doi.org/10.1214/17-AOP1193. 2

    2018 doi

  52. [62]

    Parisi, G.Infinite Number of Order Parameters for Spin-Glasses.Phys. Rev. Lett. 43(Dec 1979), 1754–1756.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1754. 2 31

    1979 doi

  53. [63]

    Parisi, G.The order parameter for spin glasses: a function on the interval 0–1.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 3 (mar 1980), 1101–1112.https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/3/042. 2

    1980 doi

  54. [64]

    Parisi, G.A sequence of approximated solutions to the S–K model for spin glasses.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 4 (1980), L115–L121.https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/4/009. 2

    1980 doi

  55. [65]

    Parisi, G.Order parameter for spin-glasses.Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 24 (1983), 1946–1948. https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1946. 2

    1983 doi

  56. [66]

    Subag, E.The geometry of the Gibbs measure of pure spherical spin glasses.Invent. Math. 210, 1 (2017), 135–209.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-017-0726-4. 11

    2017 doi

  57. [67]

    Subag, E.The complexity of spherical p-spin models—A second moment approach.Ann. Probab. 45, 5 (2017), 3385–3450.https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOP1139. 12

    2017 doi

  58. [68]

    Theory Related Fields 186, 3-4 (2023), 715–734.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-023-01200-0

    Subag, E.The free energy of spherical pure p-spin models: computation from the TAP approach.Probab. Theory Related Fields 186, 3-4 (2023), 715–734.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-023-01200-0. 12

    2023 doi

  59. [69]

    Subag, E.TAP approach for multispecies spherical spin glasses II: The free energy of the pure models. Ann. Probab. 51, 3 (2023), 1004–1024.https://doi.org/10.1214/22-aop1605. 2

    2023 doi

  60. [70]

    Subag, E.TAP approach for multi-species spherical spin glasses I: General theory.Electron. J. Probab. 30(2025), article no. 87, 32 pp.https://doi.org/10.1214/25-ejp1333. 2

    2025 doi

  61. [71]

    Talagrand, M.On Guerra’s broken replica-symmetry bound.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 337, 7 (2003), 477–480.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2003.09.001. 2, 3

    2003 doi

  62. [72]

    Theory Related Fields 134, 3 (2006), 339–382.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-005-0433-8

    Talagrand, M.Free energy of the spherical mean field model.Probab. Theory Related Fields 134, 3 (2006), 339–382.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-005-0433-8. 2, 9, 10, 11

    2006 doi

  63. [73]

    Talagrand, M.The Parisi formula.Ann. of Math. 163, 1 (2006), 221–263. https://doi.org/10.4007/ annals.2006.163.221. 2, 9

    2006

  64. [74]

    Volume II: Advanced Replica-Symmetry and Low Temperature, vol

    Talagrand, M.Mean Field Models for Spin Glasses. Volume II: Advanced Replica-Symmetry and Low Temperature, vol. 55 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A S...

    2011 doi

  65. [75]

    60 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete

    Talagrand, M.Upper and Lower Bounds for Stochastic Processes: Decomposition Theorems, second ed., vol. 60 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of ...

    2021 doi

  66. [76]

    Tomioka, R., and Suzuki, T.Spectral norm of random tensors. 2014. Preprint. https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.1407.1870. 12

    2014 doi arXiv

  67. [77]

    L.About the Almeida-Thouless transition line in the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick mean-field spin glass model.Europhys

    Toninelli, F. L.About the Almeida-Thouless transition line in the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick mean-field spin glass model.Europhys. Lett. 60, 5 (2002), 764–767. https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00667-5 . 9

    2002 doi

  68. [78]

    47 ofCambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics

    Vershynin, R.High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science, vol. 47 ofCambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108231596. 18

    2018 doi

  69. [79]

    Q., Bai, Z

    Yin, Y. Q., Bai, Z. D., and Krishnaiah, P. R.On the limit of the largest eigenvalue of the large dimensional sample covariance matrix.Probab. Theory Related Fields 78, 4 (1988), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353874. 13

    1988 doi

  70. [80]

    Zhou, Z., and Zhu, Y.Sparse random tensors: Concentration, regularization and applications.Electron. J. Stat. 15, 1 (2021), 2483–2516.https://doi.org/10.1214/21-ejs1838. 12

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.