Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 153 references

Planet-disc interactions around eccentric binaries and misaligned ring formation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A giant planet's final tilt around a binary star is set by the mass of its birth disc and the binary's eccentricity, not by the disc's original misalignment.

desk verdict Solid secular extension with a new critical-mass analysis, but the high-mass branch of the central claim needs a self-gravity check before it can be called robust. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06675 v1 pith:3JIRBLZS submitted 2025-07-09 astro-ph.EP

Rebecca G. Martin , Stephen H. Lubow This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords circumbinaryplanetsplanet-discinteractionsmisaligneddiscspolaralignmentKozai-LidovoscillationseccentricbinariesprotoplanetarySPHsimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the inclination a giant planet ends up with around a binary star is not a fossil of how its birth disc was tilted, but is largely decided by two factors: the mass of the circumbinary disc and the eccentricity of the binary. When the disc is heavy compared with the planet, the disc wins the gravitational tug-of-war and draws the planet toward either the binary's orbital plane (coplanar) or a perpendicular "polar" plane, depending on the initial tilt and binary eccentricity. When the disc is light, the binary dominates, leaving planets on a wide range of misaligned orbits. In extreme cases, a heavy, highly inclined disc can trigger Kozai-Lidov oscillations that eject the planet, and misaligned inner disc rings can form and persist. This matters because it reshapes expectations for where circumbinary planets should be found and explains observed misaligned disc structures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the linear secular system for the planet and disc tilt vectors $\boldsymbol{\ell}_p(t)$ and $\boldsymbol{\ell}_d(t)$, coupled by the coefficient $C_{pd}$ (an integral over the disc of a planet-disc kernel) and torqued by the binary through the Farago-Laskar quadrupole potential. The key threshold is the critical disc mass $M_{d,\rm cr}$ at which $\min_t[i_p(t)]=0$; above it the planet and disc transition from mutual nodal circulation to mutual libration. Around eccentric binaries the attractors are the coplanar state and the generalized polar state, whose stability is set by the critical inclination criteria given in the paper. In high-mass, highly inclined systems, the outer disc can excite Kozai-Lidov oscillations of the planet.

What would settle it

A repeat of the high-mass disc simulations ($M_d=0.05\,M$) with disc self-gravity included; if the planet no longer moves to coplanar or polar alignment (or is no longer ejected at high initial tilt), the paper's main claim would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper shows that a gap-opening giant planet and its circumbinary disc do not remain coplanar: their mutual gravitational coupling produces mutual tilt oscillations whose character changes with disc mass. For a disc below a critical mass, the planet and disc undergo mutual nodal circulation, and the binary controls the planet, which can therefore end up at a wide range of inclinations. Above that critical mass the pair librates about a common precession, and a heavy disc takes over the planet's dynamical evolution: the planet's inclination is driven toward coplanar alignment for a circular binary, and toward either coplanar or polar alignment for an eccentric binary, depending on the initial inclination and on $e_b$. In the most massive, most inclined cases the planet can undergo Kozai-Lidov oscillations and be ejected from the system, and when the planet and disc become strongly mutually misaligned, a long-lived misaligned inner disc ring can form and grow eccentric.

Load-bearing premise

The central predictions rest on treating the disc's self-gravity as negligible even for the heaviest simulated disc, which is about fifty times the planet's mass.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Around eccentric binaries with massive discs, circumbinary planets should pile up at two inclination states, near coplanar and near polar, rather than filling the full range of initial disc tilts.
  • The near-coplanarity of the Kepler circumbinary planets is consistent with the model: their short-period, low-eccentricity binaries are expected to produce mostly coplanar outcomes.
  • For high-mass, initially highly misaligned discs, some giant planets will be ejected through Kozai-Lidov oscillations, potentially depleting giant planets around the most eccentric binaries.
  • Planet-driven misaligned inner rings can survive for long times and become eccentric, offering an explanation for shadowed protoplanetary discs around binaries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same circulation-libration threshold should apply to lower-mass planets that only partially clear a gap, but with a shifted critical disc mass; this is directly testable in simulations.
  • If disc self-gravity modifies the high-mass-disc dynamics, the binary eccentricity window for polar alignment may widen or narrow; this could be checked by including self-gravity in the hydrodynamic runs.
  • A statistical test of the bimodal prediction could come from future astrometric or radial-velocity catalogues of circumbinary planets, once formation-time disc masses are inferred from stellar accretion history.
  • The Kozai-Lidov ejection channel implies that some misaligned giant planets may be lost after the gas disc has mostly dissipated, so the surviving inclination distribution could be even more bimodal than the in-disc outcome.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the secular evolution of a giant planet embedded in a circumbinary disc around an eccentric binary. The authors develop a linear secular model (Section 2) for the coupled tilts of the planet and disc, solve it as a four-eigenmode problem, and identify a critical disc mass separating mutual circulation from libration. They benchmark the model against a test-particle orbit integration (Fig. 1) and against 3D SPH simulations (Phantom) for binary eccentricities 0 and 0.5 and initial inclinations from 10 to 88.5 degrees (Table 1). The main claims are that for low-mass discs the binary dominates and leaves a wide range of planet inclinations; for high-mass discs (Md about 50 Mp) the disc dominates and drives the planet toward coplanar or polar alignment depending on initial disc inclination and binary eccentricity; in one high-inclination run the planet is ejected via Kozai-Lidov oscillations; and strongly misaligned systems form long-lived inner misaligned disc rings. The paper emphasizes that even isotropic initial disc misalignments can produce a bimodal final planet inclination distribution.

Significance. The result is potentially significant for the interpretation of circumbinary planet statistics: it identifies disc mass and binary eccentricity, rather than the initial disc misalignment, as the main determinants of final giant-planet inclinations, and it makes a falsifiable prediction (the circulation-libration boundary and the critical disc mass Md,cr) that is derived from the eigenmode solution rather than fitted. The paper has notable strengths: the analytic model is internally consistent, the test-particle limit is checked against direct orbit integration (Fig. 1), and the SPH comparisons cover both circular and eccentric binaries with clear phase-space diagnostics. The main weakness is that the high-mass branch of the central claim is computed without disc self-gravity, which is not negligible for the adopted Md = 0.05 M discs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2, first paragraph; Section 3; Table 1 (circ3, circ6, ecc3, ecc6, ecc9)] The neglect of disc self-gravity is load-bearing for the high-mass branch of the central claim. The paper states in Section 2 'We neglect effects of disc self-gravity', and the SPH setup in Section 3 does not state that self-gravity is enabled. For the Md = 0.05 M runs, using the stated parameters (Sigma proportional to R^-3/2, Rin = 6a, Rout = 10a, H/R = 0.02), the Toomre parameter is Q ~ 0.4, so the disc is gravitationally unstable; the local self-gravity precession rate pi G Sigma / (R Omega) is comparable to or larger than the binary-induced precession rate. Since the coplanar/polar dichotomy, the KL-driven ejection (ecc9), and the inner-ring evolution all rely on the Md = 0.05 M runs, the high-mass branch of the abstract is not established. Please add a self-gravity check (e.g., the Q profile and the ratio of self-gravity to binary-induced precession rates) or explicitly restrict the conclusions to the non-self-gravitating regime.
  2. [Section 5.5 and Fig. 13] The Kozai-Lidov ejection in run ecc9 is a single trajectory, and it occurs in the same high-mass regime where self-gravity is neglected. The abstract's statement that a high-mass, high-inclination disc 'can result in the planet being ejected' should be presented as a single realization of one parameter set, not as a robust outcome, unless additional runs or a parameter study are provided. This is closely tied to the self-gravity concern above, because the disc potential that drives the KL oscillations is modeled without self-gravity in the very case where Q ~ 0.4.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1 and Fig. 9 caption] The analytic model in Fig. 9 is evaluated with Rin = 6.5a and Rout = 12a, while the SPH discs in Section 3 are initialized with Rin = 6a and Rout = 10a; please justify this difference or use the same radii so the critical-mass comparison is transparent.
  2. [Section 2, first paragraph; Figs. 10, 12-14] Because the secular equations are linearized about the binary plane, the quantitative results at i0 = 40, 60, and ~90 degrees should be described as heuristic; please add an explicit statement of the model's validity range when applied to these runs.
  3. [Section 5.6, footnote 2] The caveat that the polar stationary inclinations differ between the planet and disc when their mutual interaction is included should appear in the main text near Eq. (23), since the initial inclinations in Fig. 14 are chosen using Eq. (23).
  4. [Conclusions, last paragraph] The claim of 'long-lived' inner misaligned rings is not quantified; the runs last only ~1500-2000 binary orbits, so 'long-lived' should either be defined with respect to a physical timescale (e.g., the disc viscous timescale) or softened.
  5. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption says 'Upper panel' but describes two panels; the text should refer to the surface density panel and the column-density panel separately.
  6. [Section 3] The choice of 200 binary orbits for the initial gap-opening run, followed by re-scaling the disc mass, is described in one sentence; it would help to specify the mapping from the initial low-mass surface density to the final Md values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified: the derived critical mass and alignment outcomes follow from solving the stated secular equations, with SPH simulations as independent checks rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce any 'prediction' to its own inputs by construction. Section 2 sets out the linear secular equations (6)-(9) with explicit torques from the binary (Farago & Laskar 2010) and the planet-disc coupling coefficient C_pd, then solves the eigenvalue problem analytically. The critical disc mass M_d,cr is obtained from the condition min_t[i_p(t)] = 0, which is a mathematical consequence of the eigenmodes, not a fitted parameter. The SPH simulations independently evolve the system with the same physical parameters and are compared to the analytic solution without adjusting any parameter to force agreement; the matching is qualitative and quantitative for the cases shown. Self-citations (e.g., Martin & Lubow 2019 for the generalized polar state and critical inclination formulas) are analytic, parameter-free results with stated assumptions that do not themselves include the final coplanar/polar outcome of the present paper; they are used as inputs to set initial conditions or to interpret the simulations, which independently exhibit the claimed librating or circulating behaviour. The explicit neglect of disc self-gravity (Section 2: 'We neglect effects of disc self-gravity') is a physical approximation that affects robustness, especially for the M_d=0.05 M runs, but it is a stated limitation rather than a circular step: the derivation chain does not equate the prediction with an assumed input. No equation is shown to be equivalent to its own output, no fitted value is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing assertion is justified only by a self-citation that itself lacks external or independent verification.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central parameter space is explored with a small number of hand-chosen dimensionless inputs (planet mass, disc mass, binary eccentricity, initial inclination, disc radius, temperature, viscosity). None of these are fitted to observations, and the critical masses are derived analytically. The main unstated burden is the rigid-disc picture and the neglect of self-gravity in the high-mass regime.

free parameters (7)
  • Planet mass ratio M_p/M = 0.001
    Chosen to represent a gap-opening giant planet; sets Cpd and the circulation-libration boundary.
  • Initial disc mass ratio M_d/M = 0.001, 0.01, 0.05
    Chosen to sample low-, intermediate-, and high-mass discs; the qualitative outcomes (circulation vs libration, KL ejection) depend on these values.
  • Binary eccentricity e_b = 0, 0.5 (analytic also 0.9)
    Controls polar alignment, tilt oscillations, and critical inclinations.
  • Initial disc/planet inclination i_0 = 10, 40, 60, 88.5, 81.2 degrees
    Initial tilt relative to binary; central claim that outcomes depend on inclination.
  • Disc aspect ratio H/R = 0.02
    Affects gap opening and disc warping; chosen as a cool disc.
  • Shakura-Sunyaev alpha viscosity = 0.01
    Sets disc alignment and dissipation timescales.
  • Disc outer radius R_out = 10a in SPH; analytic up to 30a
    Affects the critical disc mass (Fig. 3).
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Quadrupole secular binary torque from Farago & Laskar (2010)
    Used in Eqs. (6)-(9) to describe binary-driven precession; valid at quadrupole order away from the binary.
  • standard math Linearized small-tilt evolution equations from Lubow & Ogilvie (2000) and Lubow & Martin (2016)
    Underlies Eqs. (6)-(9) and the eigenmode analysis.
  • domain assumption Disc treated as a flat rigid precessing body with a single tilt vector
    Section 2 assumes sound crossing time short compared to nodal precession timescale; required for the two-tilt-vector model.
  • domain assumption Disc self-gravity is negligible
    Section 2 states this; for M_d = 0.05 M this may be violated and could change high-mass outcomes.
  • domain assumption Planet and disc initially mutually coplanar and disc lies outside planet orbit after gap clearing
    Initial conditions in Section 2.1 and SPH setup; the isotropic-misalignment conclusion extrapolates from this.
  • domain assumption General relativity and tidal effects on the binary are neglected
    Section 2 lists these omissions; they could modify polar libration conditions (authors cite Lepp et al. 2022; Chen et al. 2024a).
  • domain assumption Disc thermodynamics fixed as locally isothermal with H/R = 0.02
    Section 3; a warmer disc could close the planet gap when misaligned (authors note this in Section 6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Planet-disc interactions around eccentric binaries and misaligned ring formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3JIRBLZS

@misc{pith2026250706675,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Planet-disc interactions around eccentric binaries and misaligned ring formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3JIRBLZS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06675}
}
abstract

We explore the evolution of a giant planet that interacts with a circumbinary disc that orbits a misaligned binary by means of analytic models and hydrodynamical simulations. Planet-disc interactions lead to mutual tilt oscillations between the planet and the disc. Even if circumbinary gas discs form with an isotropic mutual misalignment to the binary, planet-disc interactions can cause giant planets to evolve towards coplanar or polar alignment. For a low-mass disc, the binary dominates the dynamical evolution of the planet leading to a wide range of circumbinary planet inclinations. For a high-mass disc, the disc dominates the dynamical evolution of the planet and planet inclinations move towards coplanar or polar alignment to the binary orbit, depending upon the initial disc inclination and the binary eccentricity. In addition, for a high-mass disc ($\sim 50\, M_{\rm p}$) and a high initial disc inclination, the planet can undergo Kozai-Lidov oscillations that can result in the planet being ejected from the system. For initially highly misaligned systems, the non-coplanarity of the planet and the disc can lead to long-lived inner misaligned disc rings that can become highly eccentric.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06675 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison between the evolution predicted by the analytic sec￾ular model (blue) and numerical orbit integration (black) for a planet that initially orbits at radius R = 5a from the centre of mass of an equal mass binary that has eccentricity eb = 0.5. The upper panel plots evolution of the orbit inclination from the binary orbital plane relative to the initial value. The lower panel plots the evolution of longitude… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Critical disc mass Md,cr (in units of the binary mass) between li￾bration and circulation for a circular orbit binary in a system with parameters given in Section 2.1, but with different values of the disc outer radius, Ro, in units of the binary semi-major axis. system (Lubow & Martin 2016). This critical mass is an important indicator of the type of interaction that occurs between the planet and disc. The conditio… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Inclination evolution of a planet and disc that are nearly coplanar with central eccentric orbit binary for (eb = 0.5) for parameters given at the beginning of Section 2, but for different values of disc mass in units of binary mass that increase from top to bottom. Left column: evolution of binary tilt relative to the binary orbital plane for the planet (blue) and disc (orange). Right column: phase portrait of the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Nodal precession rate of a circumbinary test particle that is nearly coplanar with an eccentric orbit binary binary as a function of binary eccen￾tricity. The precession rate is normalised by the nodal precesion rate about a circular orbit binary. circulation and libra…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper panel: The initial surface density profile for the simulations for the circular orbit binary (thin black solid line, coplanar1) and the eccentric binary (thick blue dashed line, coplanar2). Lower panel: The disc column density (on a log scale in units of M a−2 ) …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evolution of a circumbinary disc (orange lines) and planet of mass 0.001 M (blue lines) around a circular orbit binary that is misaligned by 10◦ . The initial disc mass is Md = 0.001 M (left), 0.01 M (middle) and 0.05 M (right). The upper panel shows results for the an…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as the upper and middle panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    P., Chen C., Smallwood J., Rabago I., Martin R

    Abod C. P., Chen C., Smallwood J., Rabago I., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517..732A 517, 732

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2601 2022

  3. [3]

    Aly H., Dehnen W., Nixon C., King A., 2015, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv128 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449...65A 449, 65

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv128 2015

  4. [4]

    Aly H., Lodato G., Cazzoletti P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2179 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4738A 480, 4738

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2179 2018

  5. [5]

    J., Osborn H

    Armstrong D. J., Osborn H. P., Brown D. J. A., Faedi F., G \'o mez Maqueo Chew Y., Martin D. V., Pollacco D., Udry S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.1873A 444, 1873

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1570 2014

  6. [6]

    M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.3201A 475, 3201

    Arzamasskiy L., Zhu Z., Stone J. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.3201A 475, 3201

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty001 2018

  7. [7]

    R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty169 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.5618B 475, 5618

    Bate M. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty169 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.5618B 475, 5618

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty169 2018

  8. [11]

    Progress report on the BEBOP search for circumbinary planets with radial velocities

    Baycroft T. A., Triaud A. H. M. J., Lai D., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.04191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240904191B p. arXiv:2409.04191

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.04191 2024

Show all 153 references
  1. [12]

    A., Sairam L., Triaud A

    Baycroft T. A., Sairam L., Triaud A. H. M. J., Correia A. C. M., 2025, @doi [Science Advances] 10.1126/sciadv.adu0627 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025SciA...11..627B 11, eadu0627

    2025 doi

  2. [13]

    Benisty M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629798 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597A..42B 597, A42

    2017 doi

  3. [14]

    P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..125B 152, 125

    Bennett D. P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..125B 152, 125

    2016 doi

  4. [15]

    P., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500530 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641.1148B 641, 1148

    Boss A. P., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500530 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641.1148B 641, 1148

    2006 doi

  5. [16]

    K., Hogerheijde M

    Brinch C., J rgensen J. K., Hogerheijde M. R., Nelson R. P., Gressel O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L16 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830L..16B 830, L16

    2016 doi

  6. [17]

    L., Herbst W., Leggett S

    Capelo H. L., Herbst W., Leggett S. K., Hamilton C. M., Johnson J. A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/757/1/L18 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757L..18C 757, L18

    2012 doi

  7. [18]

    H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad444 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5817C 520, 5817

    Ceppi S., Longarini C., Lodato G., Cuello N., Lubow S. H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad444 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5817C 520, 5817

    2023 doi

  8. [19]

    J., Elsender D., Bate M

    Ceppi S., Cuello N., Lodato G., Longarini C., Price D. J., Elsender D., Bate M. R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348375 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.104C 682, A104

    2024 doi

  9. [20]

    H., Martin R

    Chen C., Franchini A., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.5634C 490, 5634

    2019 doi

  10. [21]

    H., Martin R

    Chen C., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.4645C 494, 4645

    2020 doi

  11. [22]

    H., Martin R

    Chen C., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510..351C 510, 351

    2022 doi

  12. [23]

    H., Martin R

    Chen C., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., Nixon C. J., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad739 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.5033C 521, 5033

    doi

  13. [24]

    G., Nixon C

    Chen C., Martin R. G., Nixon C. J., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.3781C 525, 3781

    doi

  14. [25]

    A., Nixon C

    Chen C., Baronett S. A., Nixon C. J., Martin R. G., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533L..37C 533, L37

    doi

  15. [26]

    G., Lubow S

    Chen C., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., Nixon C. J., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad17c5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961L...5C 961, L5

    doi

  16. [27]

    I., Murray-Clay R

    Chiang E. I., Murray-Clay R. A., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383522 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...607..913C 607, 913

    2004 doi

  17. [28]

    C., Martin R

    Childs A. C., Martin R. G., 2021a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.3461C 507, 3461

    doi

  18. [29]

    C., Martin R

    Childs A. C., Martin R. G., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920L...8C 920, L8

    doi

  19. [30]

    C., Martin R

    Childs A. C., Martin R. G., Lepp S., Lubow S. H., Geller A. M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acbcc9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...945L..11C 945, L11

    2023 doi

  20. [31]

    C., Martin R

    Childs A. C., Martin R. G., Nixon C. J., Geller A. M., Lubow S. H., Zhu Z., Lepp S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...77C 962, 77

    2024 doi

  21. [32]

    J., Gendrin A., Sotomayor M., 2001, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04891.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328..485C 328, 485

    Clarke C. J., Gendrin A., Sotomayor M., 2001, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04891.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328..485C 328, 485

    2001

  22. [33]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.119C 628, A119

    Cuello N., Giuppone C. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.119C 628, A119

    2019 doi

  23. [34]

    Cuello N., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3325 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.4114C 483, 4114

    2019 doi

  24. [35]

    M., Jensen E

    Czekala I., Chiang E., Andrews S. M., Jensen E. L. N., Torres G., Wilner D. J., Stassun K. G., Macintosh B., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab287b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...22C 883, 22

    2019 doi

  25. [36]

    M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19657.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418.2656D 418, 2656

    Doolin S., Blundell K. M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19657.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418.2656D 418, 2656

    2011

  26. [37]

    R., Carter J

    Doyle L. R., Carter J. A., Fabrycky D. C., Slawson R. W., Howell S. B., Winn J. N., Orosz J. A., et al. 2011, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1210923 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Sci...333.1602D 333, 1602

    2011 doi

  27. [38]

    R., Lakeland B

    Elsender D., Bate M. R., Lakeland B. S., Jensen E. L. N., Lubow S. H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1695 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.4353E 523, 4353

    2023 doi

  28. [39]

    J., 2013, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt877 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2142F 433, 2142

    Facchini S., Lodato G., Price D. J., 2013, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt877 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2142F 433, 2142

    2013 doi

  29. [41]

    Foucart F., Lai D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/106 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..106F 764, 106

    2013 doi

  30. [42]

    Foucart F., Lai D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1869 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1731F 445, 1731

    2014 doi

  31. [43]

    G., Lubow S

    Franchini A., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz424 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485..315F 485, 315

    doi

  32. [44]

    H., Martin R

    Franchini A., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2fd8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L..18F 880, L18

    doi

  33. [45]

    G., Lubow S

    Franchini A., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.5351F 491, 5351

    2020 doi

  34. [46]

    H., Martin R

    Fu W., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/75 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...807...75F 807, 75

    doi

  35. [47]

    H., Martin R

    Fu W., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2015b, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/105 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813..105F 813, 105

    doi

  36. [48]

    H., Martin R

    Fu W., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/L29 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835L..29F 835, L29

    2017 doi

  37. [49]

    K., Carter B., King R., O'Toole S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.2932G 468, 2932

    Getley A. K., Carter B., King R., O'Toole S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.2932G 468, 2932

    2017 doi

  38. [50]

    J., Wiegert P

    Holman M. J., Wiegert P. A., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300695 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999AJ....117..621H 117, 621

    1999 doi

  39. [51]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158....8H 158, 8

    Hong Z., Quarles B., Li G., Orosz J. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158....8H 158, 8

    2019 doi

  40. [52]

    G., Lubow S

    Huang S., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adcf1f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...985...65H 985, 65

    2025 doi

  41. [53]

    M., Martin R

    Johnson T. M., Martin R. G., Lepp S., Lubow S. H., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.22728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250522728J p. arXiv:2505.22728

    2025 doi arXiv

  42. [55]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs.tmp..189K

    Kennedy G. M., et al., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs.tmp..189K

    2019 doi

  43. [56]

    R., Livio M., Lubow S

    King A. R., Livio M., Lubow S. H., Pringle J. E., 2013, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt364 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.2655K 431, 2655

    2013 doi

  44. [57]

    Kley W., Haghighipour N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A..72K 564, A72

    2014 doi

  45. [58]

    Kley W., Haghighipour N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A..20K 581, A20

    2015 doi

  46. [59]

    Kley W., Thun D., Penzlin A. B. T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...627A..91K 627, A91

    2019 doi

  47. [60]

    B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784...14K 784, 14

    Kostov V. B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784...14K 784, 14

    2014 doi

  48. [61]

    B., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/86 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...86K 827, 86

    Kostov V. B., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/86 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...86K 827, 86

    2016 doi

  49. [62]

    Kozai Y., 1962, @doi [AJ] 10.1086/108790 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962AJ.....67..591K 67, 591

    1962 doi

  50. [63]

    M., et al., 2010, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1187187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Sci...329...57L 329, 57

    Lagrange A. M., et al., 2010, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1187187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Sci...329...57L 329, 57

    2010 doi

  51. [64]

    D., Papaloizou J

    Larwood J. D., Papaloizou J. C. B., 1997, MNRAS, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.285..288L 285, 288

    1997

  52. [65]

    D., Nelson R

    Larwood J. D., Nelson R. P., Papaloizou J. C. B., Terquem C., 1996, MNRAS, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.282..597L 282, 597

    1996

  53. [66]

    G., Childs A

    Lepp S., Martin R. G., Childs A. C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac61e1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929L...5L 929, L5

    2022 doi

  54. [67]

    G., Lubow S

    Lepp S., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaf6d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...943L...4L 943, L4

    2023 doi

  55. [68]

    G., Lubow S

    Lepp S., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adc111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983..167L 983, 167

    2025 doi

  56. [69]

    J., Tao M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/96 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831...96L 831, 96

    Li G., Holman M. J., Tao M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/96 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831...96L 831, 96

    2016 doi

  57. [70]

    L., 1962, @doi [Planet

    Lidov M. L., 1962, @doi [Planet. Space Sci.] 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962P

    1962 doi

  58. [71]

    M., Paardekooper S., Baruteau C., Thebault P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/782/1/L11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782L..11L 782, L11

    Lines S., Leinhardt Z. M., Paardekooper S., Baruteau C., Thebault P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/782/1/L11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782L..11L 782, L11

    2014 doi

  59. [72]

    Lodato G., Facchini S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt878 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2157L 433, 2157

    2013 doi

  60. [74]

    E., 2007, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12332.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1287L 381, 1287

    Lodato G., Pringle J. E., 2007, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12332.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1287L 381, 1287

    2007

  61. [75]

    H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2636 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.5446L 516, 5446

    Lubow S. H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2636 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.5446L 516, 5446

    2022 doi

  62. [76]

    H., Martin R

    Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/30 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817...30L 817, 30

    2016 doi

  63. [77]

    H., Martin R

    Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2643 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3733L 473, 3733

    2018 doi

  64. [78]

    H., Ogilvie G

    Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309101 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...538..326L 538, 326

    2000 doi

  65. [79]

    H., Childs A

    Lubow S. H., Childs A. C., Martin R. G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.2852L 530, 2852

    2024 doi

  66. [80]

    K., Penny M

    Luhn J. K., Penny M. T., Gaudi B. S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/61 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...61L 827, 61

    2016 doi

  67. [81]

    Marino S., Perez S., Casassus S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L44 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798L..44M 798, L44

    2015 doi

  68. [82]

    V., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3235M 465, 3235

    Martin D. V., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3235M 465, 3235

    2017 doi

  69. [83]

    V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3482M 488, 3482

    Martin D. V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3482M 488, 3482

    2019 doi

  70. [84]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/L28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835L..28M 835, L28

    2017 doi

  71. [85]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1648 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1297M 479, 1297

    2018 doi

  72. [86]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.1332M 490, 1332

    2019 doi

  73. [87]

    V., Triaud A

    Martin D. V., Triaud A. H. M. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...570A..91M 570, A91

    2014 doi

  74. [88]

    V., Triaud A

    Martin D. V., Triaud A. H. M. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449..781M 449, 781

    2015 doi

  75. [89]

    G., Armitage P

    Martin R. G., Armitage P. J., Alexander R. D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...74M 773, 74

    2013 doi

  76. [90]

    G., Nixon C., Armitage P

    Martin R. G., Nixon C., Armitage P. J., Lubow S. H., Price D. J., 2014a, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/790/2/L34 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790L..34M 790, L34

    doi

  77. [91]

    G., Nixon C., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Nixon C., Lubow S. H., Armitage P. J., Price D. J., Do g an S., King A., 2014b, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/792/2/L33 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792L..33M 792, L33

    doi

  78. [92]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., Nixon C., Armitage P. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw605 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.4345M 458, 4345

    2016 doi

  79. [93]

    G., Nixon C

    Martin R. G., Nixon C. J., Pringle J. E., Livio M., 2019a, @doi [New Astronomy] 10.1016/j.newast.2019.01.001 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NewA...70....7M 70, 7

    2019 doi

  80. [94]

    V., et al., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833669 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..68M 624, A68

    Martin D. V., et al., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833669 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..68M 624, A68

    doi

  81. [95]

    G., Lepp S., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lepp S., Lubow S. H., Kenworthy M. A., Kennedy G. M., Vallet D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac54b4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927L..26M 927, L26

    2022 doi

  82. [96]

    Matsakos T., K \"o nigl A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...60M 153, 60

    2017 doi

  83. [97]

    Mayer L., Wadsley J., Quinn T., Stadel J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09468.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363..641M 363, 641

    2005

  84. [98]

    F., Ostriker E

    McKee C. F., Ostriker E. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ARA

    2007 arXiv

  85. [99]

    Meschiari S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...752...71M 752, 71

    2012 doi

  86. [100]

    Meschiari S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790...41M 790, 41

    2014 doi

  87. [101]

    J., Prato L., McCabe C., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007prpl.conf..395M pp 395--409

    Monin J.-L., Clarke C. J., Prato L., McCabe C., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007prpl.conf..395M pp 395--409

    2007

  88. [102]

    J., Lithwick Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905..106M 905, 106

    Mu \ n oz D. J., Lithwick Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905..106M 905, 106

    2020 doi

  89. [103]

    M., Pierens A., Nelson R

    Mutter M. M., Pierens A., Nelson R. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.4504M 469, 4504

    2017 doi

  90. [104]

    C., Di Sisto R

    Naoz S., Li G., Zanardi M., de El \' a G. C., Di Sisto R. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6fb0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...18N 154, 18

    2017 doi

  91. [105]

    G., Nixon C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2267 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481...20N 481, 20

    Nealon R., Dipierro G., Alexander R., Martin R. G., Nixon C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2267 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481...20N 481, 20

    2018 doi

  92. [106]

    Nealon R., Cuello N., Alexander R., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3186 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.tmp.2783N p. 2783

    doi

  93. [107]

    Nealon R., Pinte C., Alexander R., Mentiplay D., Dipierro G., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4951N 484, 4951

    doi

  94. [108]

    F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312752 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...537L..65N 537, L65

    Nelson A. F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312752 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...537L..65N 537, L65

    2000 doi

  95. [109]

    P., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06929.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..233N 345, 233

    Nelson R. P., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06929.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..233N 345, 233

    2003

  96. [110]

    J., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21072.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.2597N 423, 2597

    Nixon C. J., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21072.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.2597N 423, 2597

    2012

  97. [111]

    J., King A

    Nixon C. J., King A. R., Pringle J. E., 2011, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01121.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417L..66N 417, L66

    2011

  98. [112]

    Nixon C., King A., Price D., 2013, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt1136 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1946N 434, 1946

    2013 doi

  99. [113]

    Offner S. S. R., Kratter K. M., Matzner C. D., Krumholz M. R., Klein R. I., 2010, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1485 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725.1485O 725, 1485

    2010 doi

  100. [114]

    A., et al., 2012a, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1228380 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Sci...337.1511O 337, 1511

    Orosz J. A., et al., 2012a, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1228380 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Sci...337.1511O 337, 1511

    doi

  101. [115]

    A., et al., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/87 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758...87O 758, 87

    Orosz J. A., et al., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/87 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758...87O 758, 87

    doi

  102. [116]

    M., Th \'e bault P., Baruteau C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/754/1/L16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754L..16P 754, L16

    Paardekooper S.-J., Leinhardt Z. M., Th \'e bault P., Baruteau C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/754/1/L16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754L..16P 754, L16

    2012 doi

  103. [117]

    Papaloizou J. C. B., Lin D. N. C., 1995, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/175127 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...438..841P 438, 841

    1995 doi

  104. [118]

    Papaloizou J. C. B., Terquem C., 1995, MNRAS, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.274..987P 274, 987

    1995

  105. [119]

    Picogna G., Marzari F., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526162 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  106. [120]

    P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...472..993P 472, 993

    Pierens A., Nelson R. P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...472..993P 472, 993

    2007 doi

  107. [121]

    P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...483..633P 483, 633

    Pierens A., Nelson R. P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...483..633P 483, 633

    2008 doi

  108. [122]

    P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A.134P 556, A134

    Pierens A., Nelson R. P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A.134P 556, A134

    2013 doi

  109. [123]

    P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty780 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.2547P 477, 2547

    Pierens A., Nelson R. P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty780 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.2547P 477, 2547

    2018 doi

  110. [124]

    J., 2007, @doi [Pasa] 10.1071/AS07022 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASA...24..159P 24, 159

    Price D. J., 2007, @doi [Pasa] 10.1071/AS07022 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASA...24..159P 24, 159

    2007 doi

  111. [125]

    J., 2012, @doi [Journal of Computational Physics] 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.011 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JCoPh.231..759P 231, 759

    Price D. J., 2012, @doi [Journal of Computational Physics] 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.011 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JCoPh.231..759P 231, 759

    2012 doi

  112. [127]

    J., et al., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031

    Price D. J., et al., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031

    2018 doi

  113. [128]

    J., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty647 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1270P 477, 1270

    Price D. J., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty647 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1270P 477, 1270

    doi

  114. [129]

    J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/5/111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151..111Q 151, 111

    Quarles B., Lissauer J. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/5/111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151..111Q 151, 111

    2016 doi

  115. [130]

    Quarles B., Satyal S., Kostov V., Kaib N., Haghighipour N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856..150Q 856, 150

    2018 doi

  116. [131]

    G., Lubow S

    Rabago I., Zhu Z., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.2138R 520, 2138

    2023 doi

  117. [132]

    G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1787 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533..360R 533, 360

    Rabago I., Zhu Z., Lubow S., Martin R. G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1787 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533..360R 533, 360

    2024 doi

  118. [133]

    R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L..16R 764, L16

    Rafikov R. R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L..16R 764, L16

    2013 doi

  119. [134]

    Raghavan D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..190....1R 190, 1

    2010 doi

  120. [135]

    Sahlmann J., Triaud A. H. M. J., Martin D. V., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2428 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447..287S 447, 287

    2015 doi

  121. [136]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A

    1973

  122. [137]

    H., Lubow S

    Shi J.-M., Krolik J. H., Lubow S. H., Hawley J. F., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/118 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...749..118S 749, 118

    2012 doi

  123. [138]

    R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/58 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808...58S 808, 58

    Silsbee K., Rafikov R. R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/58 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808...58S 808, 58

    2015 doi

  124. [139]

    L., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Lubow S. H., Franchini A., Martin R. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz994 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.2919S 486, 2919

    2019 doi

  125. [140]

    L., Franchini A., Chen C., Becerril E., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Franchini A., Chen C., Becerril E., Lubow S. H., Yang C.-C., Martin R. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..487S 494, 487

    2020 doi

  126. [141]

    L., Nealon R., Chen C., Martin R

    Smallwood J. L., Nealon R., Chen C., Martin R. G., Bi J., Dong R., Pinte C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2624 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508..392S 508, 392

    2021 doi

  127. [142]

    L., Yang C.-C., Zhu Z., Martin R

    Smallwood J. L., Yang C.-C., Zhu Z., Martin R. G., Dong R., Cuello N., Isella A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad742 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.3500S 521, 3500

    2023 doi

  128. [143]

    J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab665b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159...94S 159, 94

    Socia Q. J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab665b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159...94S 159, 94

    2020 doi

  129. [144]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01948-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..702S 7, 702

    Standing M. R., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01948-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..702S 7, 702

    2023 doi

  130. [145]

    P., Fabrycky D

    Sutherland A. P., Fabrycky D. C., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637x/818/1/6 , 818, 6

    2016 doi

  131. [146]

    Terquem C., Ajmia A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16295.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404..409T 404, 409

    2010

  132. [147]

    Thun D., Kley W., Picogna G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730666 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.102T 604, A102

    2017 doi

  133. [148]

    Tokuda K., et al., 2014, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789L...4T 789, L4

    2014 doi

  134. [149]

    Triaud A. H. M. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.3561T 511, 3561

    2022 doi

  135. [150]

    E., Evans N

    Verrier P. E., Evans N. W., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14446.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.394.1721V 394, 1721

    2009

  136. [151]

    F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10768 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.481..475W 481, 475

    Welsh W. F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10768 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.481..475W 481, 475

    2012 doi

  137. [152]

    F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/26 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809...26W 809, 26

    Welsh W. F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/26 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809...26W 809, 26

    2015 doi

  138. [153]

    B., Haghighipour N., Orosz J

    Windemuth D., Agol E., Carter J., Ford E. B., Haghighipour N., Orosz J. A., Welsh W. F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.1313W 490, 1313

    2019 doi

  139. [154]

    N., Holman M

    Winn J. N., Holman M. J., Johnson J. A., Stanek K. Z., Garnavich P. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383089 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...603L..45W 603, L45

    2004 doi

  140. [155]

    Yamanaka A., Sasaki T., 2019, @doi [Earth, Planets, and Space] 10.1186/s40623-019-1064-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019EP&S...71...82Y 71, 82

    2019 doi

  141. [156]

    K., Stevenson S., Nixon C

    Young A. K., Stevenson S., Nixon C. J., Rice K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.2616Y 525, 2616

    2023 doi

  142. [157]

    J., Lai D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2375 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..603Z 473, 603

    Zanazzi J. J., Lai D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2375 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..603Z 473, 603

    2018 doi

  143. [158]

    C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab24d5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...879...92Z 879, 92

    Zhang Z., Fabrycky D. C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab24d5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...879...92Z 879, 92

    2019 doi

  144. [159]

    Zhu Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.4221Z 483, 4221

    2019 doi

  145. [160]

    von Zeipel H., 1910, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.19091832202 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1910AN....183..345V 183, 345

    1910 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.