Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Majorana edge reconstruction and the $\nu=5/2$ non-Abelian thermal Hall puzzle

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that edge reconstruction in the neutral Majorana sector can make a Pfaffian or anti-Pfaffian bulk produce the measured PH-Pfaffian thermal Hall signature.

desk verdict A genuinely new resolution to the ν=5/2 thermal Hall puzzle, with a sound analytic core, but the alternating Pf/aPf stripe input is proven numerically only in an excited state, not the ground state. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07161 v1 pith:UX5CTE3V submitted 2025-07-09 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Tevž Lotrič , Taige Wang , Michael P. Zaletel , Steven H. Simon , S. A. Parameswaran This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el MSC 81V7081T40 PACS 73.43.Cd73.43.-f
keywords fractionalquantumHallthermalconductancePfaffianstateanti-PfaffianPH-PfaffianMajoranaedgereconstructionnon-Abeliananyonsdensity-matrixrenormalizationgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a resolution to a long-standing conflict at filling factor $\nu=5/2$. Numerical studies say the bulk is either a Pfaffian or an anti-Pfaffian state, while thermal Hall experiments measure a half-integer value associated with the particle-hole-symmetric Pfaffian (PH-Pfaffian) edge. The authors argue that a realistic confining potential makes the edge reconstruct into alternating Pfaffian and anti-Pfaffian stripes, and that hybridization among the Majorana modes at the stripe interfaces produces an outer edge that behaves exactly like the PH-Pfaffian edge over a wide parameter window. The two chiral Majorana modes required by the true bulk are pushed deep into the sample, where they do not equilibrate with the edge or the contacts on experimental scales. If this picture is right, the measured half-integer thermal Hall conductance no longer rules out a Pfaffian or anti-Pfaffian bulk.

What carries the argument

The central object is a quadratic Majorana Hamiltonian for a one-dimensional chain of alternating Pfaffian and anti-Pfaffian stripes. Each Pf/aPf interface carries four co-propagating Majorana modes, and adjacent interfaces host counter-propagating modes that can gap each other out. The argument works by pairing these modes: the counter-propagating pairs gap out first, leaving a $C=2$ topological phase in which one pair of modes remains at the physical edge and another pair becomes the deep chiral modes. The integer invariant $C$ is stable against parameter changes and survives random inter-mode couplings, including quenched disorder, which is why the reconstruction does not require fine-tuning.

What would settle it

A DMRG calculation on a wider cylinder or with a different gate geometry that resolves the ground-state orbital entanglement spectrum at a density minimum should show the unambiguous Pfaffian counting sequence $(1,1,3,\ldots)$ if the striped parent state is real; if the minima show only ambiguous reversed chirality in the thermodynamic limit, the hybridization calculation has no physical input. On the experimental side, contacts designed to couple to modes deeper in the bulk should change the measured thermal conductance if the deep modes are truly decoupled, and observing no change would support the screening picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Majorana edge reconstruction can screen a Pfaffian or anti-Pfaffian bulk so that its transport signatures become indistinguishable from those of the PH-Pfaffian. For a stack of alternating Pfaffian and anti-Pfaffian stripes near the edge, the four Majorana modes at each Pf/aPf interface hybridize with the original edge modes. In the $C=2$ phase of the composite edge, the outermost modes form the PH-Pfaffian edge theory $L_c + L_M^{-1}$, while a pair of chiral Majorana modes sits at momenta $\pm k_0$ deep in the bulk. These deep modes are separated from the physical edge by a mesoscopic length and suffer from both small wavefunction overlap and momentum mismatch, so they decouple from thermal transport. The paper argues that this configuration is a stable phase rather than a fine-tuned point, and that it naturally explains the experimentally observed half-integer thermal Hall conductance and its temperature scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The whole mechanism assumes that the ground-state edge of a realistic $\nu=5/2$ droplet really is a sequence of alternating Pfaffian and anti-Pfaffian stripes; the paper's own ground-state entanglement spectra at density minima show reversed chirality but ambiguous level counting, and the clean Pfaffian counting appears only in a momentum-boosted excited state with different total charge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Pfaffian or anti-Pfaffian bulk can produce the experimentally observed half-integer thermal Hall conductance without invoking bulk disorder or fine-tuning.
  • The same mechanism applies to the interface between $\nu=5/2$ and $\nu=3$, so existing thermal transport and noise measurements can be consistent with either bulk phase.
  • Bulk-boundary correspondence is preserved because the deep chiral Majorana pair combines with the PH-Pfaffian-like edge to reproduce the Pf or aPf edge content.
  • Edge measurements that couple only to the outer modes cannot distinguish a genuine PH-Pfaffian bulk from a screened Pfaffian or anti-Pfaffian bulk.
  • The predicted equilibration mechanism involving a trapped Majorana impurity gives an equilibration length scaling roughly as $T^{-1}$, matching the lack of low-temperature growth in later experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the striped-edge picture survives in larger systems, the same Majorana-hybridization logic could apply to other paired Hall states with multiple nearly degenerate non-Abelian candidates, where edge reconstruction could mimic a different topological order.
  • A direct implication the authors leave implicit is that non-thermal probes, such as shot noise and Fabry-Perot interference, would also see PH-Pfaffian edge physics whenever the deep modes are not contacted.
  • A testable extension would be a systematic DMRG sweep over the steepness of the confining potential: the random-matrix sampling predicts a finite $C=2$ window in all parameter ranges, so one should be able to map where the PH-Pfaffian-like edge gives way to the $C=4$ Pf-strip edge.
  • The deep modes carry entropy yet decouple from floating contacts, so standard assumptions that all edge modes equilibrate with contacts should be reconsidered for multi-mode thermal Hall measurements beyond $\nu=5/2$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a resolution of the ν=5/2 thermal Hall puzzle. DMRG calculations of an edge between ν=2 and ν=5/2 show a ~40ℓB region of strong density oscillations; the authors interpret this as alternating Pfaffian and AntiPfaffian stripes. Treating this stripe pattern as input, they construct a quadratic Majorana model of the interface modes (Sec. IV) and show that a finite region of parameter space has topological invariant C=2. In that phase, coupling to the physical boundary yields an effective edge of a charge mode plus one upstream Majorana—the PH-Pfaffian edge—while two chiral Majorana modes are pushed deep into the bulk at momenta ±k0. They argue these deep modes do not equilibrate with the edge or contacts, so thermal transport measures the PH-Pfaffian value κ=κ0/2 even when the bulk is Pf or aPf. The paper further discusses equilibration of the remaining PHPf edge, proposing a trapped-impurity Majorana mechanism to explain the observed temperature scaling, and outlines interferometric consequences.

Significance. If the central premise is correct, this is a significant conceptual advance: it shows that edge reconstruction in the neutral Majorana sector could reconcile the numerical preference for Pf/aPf bulks with the measured half-integer thermal Hall conductance. The analytic core is transparent and the topological-index argument is internally sound, and the paper is honest about several uncertainties. The quantitative estimates for decoupling of deep modes and for equilibration lengths are useful and go beyond a purely formal statement. However, the strongest claim is conditional on the DMRG identification of alternating Pf/aPf stripes, and that identification is not established by the ground-state data presented. The random-matrix sampling of parameters also provides only a weak sense of 'genericity.' These issues affect the load-bearing input to the analytic model, so the paper currently reads as a well-constructed scenario rather than a demonstrated resolution.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III and Sec. IV] The input to the central analytic construction is the alternating Pf/aPf stripe pattern: Sec. IV states 'we take the stripe pattern from DMRG as an input' and models it with the Hamiltonian (6). The DMRG ground state, however, shows only reversed chirality at the density minima with the counting explicitly described as 'ambiguous' (Sec. III, Fig. 2(A3–A4)); unambiguous Pf counting appears only in a momentum-boosted excited state with δQ=1.5e (Fig. 2(B)). The Supplement (Sec. I.B, Fig. S2) claims the ground state 'confirms a parent configuration of alternating Pf and aPf strips', but the data it presents show chiral spectra that 'do not match the Pf pattern' at the minima. This gap is load-bearing: without independent evidence that the ground-state edge is striped, the C=2 calculation in Sec. IV is a scenario rather than a derivation for the measured edge. Please provide a direct diagnostic (for example, comparing the ambiguous ground-state OES with the hybridized spectrum predicted by Eqs. (8)–(10), or computing a local topological marker), or explicitly reframe the paper's claim as conditional.
  2. [Sec. V] The identification of the unhybridized parent relies on a conjecture. The single-channel p+ip calculation (Eqs. (8)–(10)) demonstrates Pauli blocking of hybridization in a boosted state, but the extension to the multi-channel Pf–aPf case is explicitly conjectural: 'We conjecture that this mechanism results in the difference in OES shown in Fig.2A,B.' Moreover, the boosted state has δQ=1.5e relative to the ground state, so it is not a same-sector probe of the ground-state edge. Because this excited-state diagnostic is the only place where unambiguous Pf counting is seen, the two-step mechanism (stripes at high energy, hybridization at low energy) is not confirmed for the ground state. Please either prove the multi-channel Pauli-blocking statement or supply ground-state evidence for the stripe pattern.
  3. [Sec. IV, Table I] The claim that the C=2 phase is generic rather than fine-tuned is supported only by random-matrix sampling with the ad hoc distribution (7). The probabilities in Table I (0.30–0.81) depend on an arbitrary measure over the matrix elements f and g, and the paper itself cautions that these probabilities 'should not be interpreted literally'. In addition, the physical values of R and s are unknown ('it is unclear what values of s and R apply'). Thus the assertion of a 'wide range of physically reasonable parameters' is not quantitatively established. I am not asking for a microscopic derivation of f and g, but the stability claim should be formulated more cautiously, e.g., as existence of a finite phase region in a toy parameter space, rather than as a generic feature of realistic edges.
  4. [Sec. VI and Supplement VII.B] The observable prediction κ=κ0/2 requires not only decoupling of the deep modes but also equilibration of the remaining Lc+L^{−1}_M edge. The paper argues that the standard Δ=3 operator is too weak and introduces a trapped Majorana impurity γ with the Δ=3/2 coupling (∂xϕ)χγ, estimating that S∼3 gives leq∼2µm. This mechanism is, as written, an assumption: no microscopic model or numerical evidence is given for the existence of such impurity Majorana modes in the relevant GaAs heterostructures, and the agreement with the temperature dependence is qualitative. I would like the authors to either provide a concrete disorder model that yields γ, or clearly label this part as a phenomenological hypothesis that is not required for the central edge-reconstruction mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV] The word 'simplity' in 'for simplity of exposition' should be 'simplicity'.
  2. [Sec. V and Supplement Fig. S4] The chemical-potential notation for the soft-edge case is inconsistent: the main text sets µL=−0.1EC on the vacuum side, while Supplement Fig. S4 says µR=−0.1EC on the vacuum side; Supplement I.A also writes 'µR=−2EC chosen inside the cyclotron gap,' which conflicts with the main-text convention that µL is the vacuum-side potential. Please harmonize these definitions.
  3. [Sec. IV, Table I] Table I appears to have missing entries: the s=0 row has only two numbers and the s=2 row has only two numbers, while the header lists three R columns. Please fill in the missing values or state explicitly which combinations were not computed.
  4. [Eq. (7)] The Gaussian distributions for f should specify l<l′, since f is antisymmetric and its diagonal elements vanish; the Supplement (Eq. S10) already uses this convention, but the main-text equation does not.
  5. [References] References [44] and [52] are the same paper (Zaletel, Mong, and Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 236801 (2013)); please remove the duplicate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the C=2 phase is computed from random couplings with the DMRG stripe pattern as an external input, and transport comparison is a parameter-scan consistency check.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The DMRG edge profile is an external numerical input, explicitly stated as such in Sec. IV: 'we therefore take the stripe pattern from DMRG as an input, and study the hybridization of the resulting low-energy modes analytically.' The central C=2 result is obtained by sampling random inter-Majorana couplings (Eq. 7) and computing the topological invariant for each instance; Table I reports C=2 frequencies between 0.30 and 0.81, so the PHPf-like edge is not imposed by construction. The simplification that yields C=2 is a particular limit of the random ensemble, not a fit to the desired answer. The transport comparison in Sec. VI and the Supplement is a consistency check: the hydrodynamic simulation scans the equilibration lengths lInner and lEdge and identifies a region matching the measured kappa, while the supporting estimates for these lengths come from independent physical scales (velocities, disorder correlation lengths, thermal lengths). This is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations (Refs. 27-30, 45) concern equilibration mechanisms and supplement details, and are not load-bearing for the central reduction; the Pf/aPf interface ingredients cite independent works (Refs. 42, 43, 48, 49). The ground-state OES ambiguity noted in Sec. III and the Supplement ('the counting is ambiguous'; minima are chiral 'though it does not match the Pf pattern because local hybridization') is a genuine evidence-quality weakness for the physical input, but it is not a circularity: the subsequent analytic derivation is self-contained conditional on that input, and the input is not defined in terms of the conclusion. The paper's overall claim is therefore an internally consistent derivation plus a parameter-scan consistency argument, not an equation-level reduction of the output to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the DMRG density oscillations are alternating Pf/aPf stripes, that each such interface carries four Majorana modes, and that only adjacent interfaces couple. The analytic model then has many parameters (velocities, inter-mode couplings) that are sampled randomly rather than derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian. The genericity of the C=2 phase is established only within this random-matrix sampling. The decoupling of the deep modes and the equilibration of the PHPf edge rely on estimates of disorder correlation lengths, impurity strengths, and a hypothesized trapped Majorana impurity.

free parameters (5)
  • R and s (coupling distribution) = R in {0, 0.5, 1}, s in {0, 1, 2}
    Parameters of the random matrix model (Eq. 7) governing f and g couplings. The probability of the C=2 phase, which is required for the PHPf edge, varies from 0.30 to 0.81 across these values; the claim that C=2 is generic is therefore distribution-dependent.
  • Mode velocities v_l = v1 = v2 = 14 (Bloch calc); |v| = 1 (transfer matrix)
    Velocities are chosen freely; the authors state the phase structure is insensitive, but the values are inputs to the model.
  • k0 (momentum offset of deep modes) = ~1/ℓB on dimensional grounds; example 0.7/ℓB
    Controls suppression factor exp(2 wD k0) for deep-mode equilibration. The decoupling conclusion requires wD k0 >> 1; k0 is not computed from first principles.
  • Disorder/impurity parameters S, lDisorder, wD = S ~ 1-10, lDisorder ~ wD ~ 100 nm
    Enter the estimates of lEdge-inner and leq (Eqs. S17, S20). Chosen to be experimentally plausible, but the conclusions depend on these choices.
  • lInner and lEdge in hydrodynamic simulation = lInner > ~100 µm, lEdge < ~5 µm
    Scanned so that simulated conductance matches the experimental value 0.5 ± 0.05 (Fig. S7). This demonstrates consistency, not a first-principles prediction.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Bulk-boundary correspondence fixes the Pf, aPf, and PHPf edge content to Lc + L^{+1}_M, Lc + L^{-3}_M, Lc + L^{-1}_M
    Standard result in the ν=5/2 literature, used to interpret the edge theories in Sec. II.
  • domain assumption A Pf/aPf interface hosts four co-propagating Majorana modes
    Used in Sec. IV to set up H_{4N}; follows from comparing LPf and LaPf.
  • ad hoc to paper Only couplings between adjacent interfaces (and between the vacuum interface and the first quadruplet) are non-negligible
    Assumed 'physically reasonable for local interactions' in Sec. IV; if longer-range couplings are relevant, the C=2 argument needs modification.
  • domain assumption The random matrix distribution (Eq. 7) samples the space of physical couplings
    The authors caution the probabilities 'should not be interpreted literally', so the genericity of C=2 is conditional on this modeling assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper A trapped Majorana zero mode γ exists at impurities and couples via (∂x φ) χ γ
    Introduced in Sec. VII A to provide an equilibration mechanism for the PHPf edge with leq ~ T^{-1}; no independent evidence is provided.
  • domain assumption No LL mixing (DMRG)
    The Hamiltonian is projected to the N=1 LL (Eq. 3); LL mixing is neglected as is standard in such calculations.
invented entities (2)
  • Deep chiral Majorana modes ψ1, ψ2
    purpose: Carry the topologically mandated central charge of the Pf/aPf bulk away from the physical edge, leaving an effective PHPf edge
    These are consequences of the C=2 hybridization model, not independently observed; their momentum offset k0 and decoupling are model predictions.
  • Trapped Majorana impurity γ independent evidence
    purpose: Provide an equilibrating coupling (∂xφ)χγ between the charge mode and the edge Majorana, with leq ~ T^{-1}
    The model predicts a T^{-1} equilibration length scaling, distinguishable from the T^{-4} scaling of the conventional operator; however, the existence of such impurities in the 2DEG is not established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Majorana edge reconstruction and the $\nu=5/2$ non-Abelian thermal Hall puzzle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UX5CTE3V

@misc{pith2026250707161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Majorana edge reconstruction and the $\nu=5/2$ non-Abelian thermal Hall puzzle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UX5CTE3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07161}
}
abstract

Pioneering thermal transport measurements on two-dimensional electron gases in high magnetic fields have demonstrated that the quantized Hall state at filling factor $\nu=5/2$ has a thermal Hall conductance $\kappa$ quantized in half-integer multiples of $\kappa_0 = {\pi^2 k_B^2 T}/{3h}$. Half-integer $\kappa/\kappa_0$ is a signature of neutral Majorana edge modes, in turn linked to the presence of non-Abelian anyon excitations in the bulk. However, the experimentally observed value of $\kappa$ corresponds to the 'PH-Pfaffian' state, in tension with numerical studies which instead favor either the Pfaffian or the AntiPfaffian. A variety of mechanisms have been invoked to explain this discrepancy, but have been either ruled out by further experiments or else involve fine-tuning. Building on density-matrix-renormalization group studies of physically realistic edges and analytic calculations of edge structure, we propose an alternative resolution of this puzzle involving an 'edge reconstruction' solely involving the neutral Majorana sector of the theory. Such a Majorana edge reconstruction can "screen'' a Pfaffian or AntiPfaffian bulk, so that transport signatures become indistinguishable from those of the PH-Pfaffian. We argue that this physically natural scenario is consistent with experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07161 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Effective String Theory Toolbox for Quantum Hall Interfaces II: Majorana Fermions on Fluctuating Moore-Read Worldsheets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On a fluctuating Moore-Read interface, the changing line element fixes a universal half-density transport law for the chiral Majorana mode, and the Majorana stress tensor mediates its coupling to the shape dynamics.

  2. Edge Reconstruction in a Quantum Spin Hall Insulator

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a microscopic model of a quantum spin Hall insulator, a smooth confining edge potential drives s-orbital charge reconstruction and a spin-polarized edge state with an emergent ferromagnetic exchange scale.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Willett, J

    R. Willett, J. P. Eisenstein, H. L. St¨ ormer, D. C. Tsui, A. C. Gossard, and J. H. English, Observation of an even- denominator quantum number in the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1776 (1987)

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    R. H. Morf, Transition from quantum hall to compress- ible states in the second landau level: New light on the ν = 5/2 enigma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    E. H. Rezayi and F. D. M. Haldane, Incompressible paired hall state, stripe order, and the composite fermion liquid phase in half-filled landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4685 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    M. R. Peterson, T. Jolicoeur, and S. Das Sarma, Finite- 9 layer thickness stabilizes the pfaffian state for the 5/2 fractional quantum hall effect: Wave function overlap and topological degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 016807 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Wan, Z.-X

    X. Wan, Z.-X. Hu, E. H. Rezayi, and K. Yang, Frac- tional quantum hall effect at ν=5/2: Ground states, non-abelian quasiholes, and edge modes in a microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165316 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    A. E. Feiguin, E. Rezayi, K. Yang, C. Nayak, and S. Das Sarma, Spin polarization of the ν = 5 /2 quan- tum hall state, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115322 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    J. Zhao, D. N. Sheng, and F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantum hall states at 1 3 and 5 2 filling: Density-matrix renormalization group calculations, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195135 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    E. H. Rezayi and S. H. Simon, Breaking of particle-hole symmetry by landau level mixing in the ν = 5/2 quan- tized hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 116801 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Tylan-Tyler and Y

    A. Tylan-Tyler and Y. Lyanda-Geller, Phase diagram and edge states of the ν = 5/2 fractional quantum hall state with landau level mixing and finite well thickness, Phys. Rev. B 91, 205404 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, F. Pollmann, and E. H. Rezayi, Infinite density matrix renormalization group for multicomponent quantum hall systems, Physical Review B 91, 10.1103/physrevb.91.045115 (2015)

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Pakrouski, M

    K. Pakrouski, M. R. Peterson, T. Jolicoeur, V. W. Scarola, C. Nayak, and M. Troyer, Phase diagram of the ν = 5/2 fractional quantum hall effect: Effects of landau- level mixing and nonzero width, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021004 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    E. H. Rezayi, Landau level mixing and the ground state of the ν = 5/2 quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 026801 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Yutushui and D

    M. Yutushui and D. F. Mross, Large-scale simulations of particle-hole-symmetric Pfaffian t rial wave functions, Phys. Rev. B 102, 195153 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    E. H. Rezayi, K. Pakrouski, and F. D. M. Haldane, Stabil- ity of the particle-hole pfaffian state and the 5 2 -fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 104, L081407 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Herviou and F

    L. Herviou and F. Mila, Possible restoration of particle- hole symmetry in the 5/2-quantized hall state at small magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 107, 115137 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    G. J. Henderson, G. M¨ oller, and S. H. Simon, Energy minimization of paired composite fermion wave functions in the spherical geometry, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245128 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect, Nuclear Physics B 360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  10. [18]

    S.-S. Lee, S. Ryu, C. Nayak, and M. P. A. Fisher, Particle-hole symmetry and the ν = 5 2 quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236807 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Levin, B

    M. Levin, B. I. Halperin, and B. Rosenow, Particle-hole symmetry and the pfaffian state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236806 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    Banerjee, M

    M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, D. E. Feldman, Y. Oreg, and A. Stern, Observation of half-integer ther- mal hall conductance, Nature 559, 205–210 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Dutta, W

    B. Dutta, W. Yang, R. Melcer, H. K. Kundu, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, and D. Mross, Distinguishing be- tween non-abelian topological orders in a quan- tum hall system, Science 375, 193 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abg6116

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Dutta, V

    B. Dutta, V. Umansky, M. Banerjee, and M. Heiblum, Isolated ballistic non-abelian interface channel, Science 377, 1198–1201 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    A. K. Paul, P. Tiwari, R. Melcer, V. Umansky, and M. Heiblum, Topological thermal hall conductance of even-denominator fractional states, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 076601 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    D. T. Son, Is the composite fermion a dirac particle?, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031027 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Banerjee, M

    M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, A. Rosenblatt, Y. Oreg, D. E. Feldman, A. Stern, and V. Umansky, Observed quanti- zation of anyonic heat flow, Nature 545, 75–79 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    S. H. Simon, Interpretation of thermal conductance of the ν = 5/2 edge, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121406 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    S. H. Simon and B. Rosenow, Partial equilibration of the anti-pfaffian edge due to majorana disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 126801 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    interpretation of thermal conductance of the ν = 5 /2 edge

    D. E. Feldman, Comment on “interpretation of thermal conductance of the ν = 5 /2 edge”, Phys. Rev. B 98, 167401 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    comment on ‘interpretation of thermal conductance of the ν = 5/2 edge’

    S. H. Simon, Reply to “comment on ‘interpretation of thermal conductance of the ν = 5/2 edge’ ”, Phys. Rev. B 98, 167402 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and B. I. Halperin, Topological order from disorder and the quantized hall thermal metal: Possible applications to the ν = 5 2 state, Physical Review B 98, 10.1103/physrevb.98.045112 (2018)

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    D. F. Mross, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, G. Margalit, and M. Heiblum, Theory of disorder-induced half-integer thermal hall conductance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026801 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Lian and J

    B. Lian and J. Wang, Theory of the disordered ν = 5 2 quantum thermal hall state: Emergent symmetry and phase diagram, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165124 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Wan and K

    X. Wan and K. Yang, Striped quantum hall state in a half-filled landau level, Phys. Rev. B 93, 201303 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    C. d. C. Chamon and X. G. Wen, Sharp and smooth boundaries of quantum hall liquids, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8227 (1994)

    1994

  28. [36]

    S. M. Reimann, M. Koskinen, M. Manninen, and B. R. Mottelson, Quantum dots in magnetic fields: Phase di- agram and broken symmetry at the maximum-density- droplet edge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3270 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    X. Wan, E. H. Rezayi, and K. Yang, Edge reconstruction in the fractional quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. B 68, 125307 (2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    Karzig, A

    T. Karzig, A. Levchenko, L. I. Glazman, and F. von Op- pen, Relaxation and edge reconstruction in integer quan- tum hall systems, New Journal of Physics 14, 105009 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    J. Wang, Y. Meir, and Y. Gefen, Edge reconstruction in the ν=2/3 fractional quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 246803 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Khanna, M

    U. Khanna, M. Goldstein, and Y. Gefen, Fractional edge reconstruction in integer quantum hall phases, Phys. Rev. B 103, L121302 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantized thermal trans- port in the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832 (1997)

    1997

  34. [42]

    Park and F

    Y. Park and F. D. M. Haldane, Guiding-center hall vis- cosity and intrinsic dipole moment along edges of incom- 10 pressible fractional quantum hall fluids, Physical Review B 90, 10.1103/physrevb.90.045123 (2014)

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    W. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and K. Yang, Topological inter- face between pfaffian and anti-pfaffian order in ν = 5/2 quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 146802 (2020)

    2020

  36. [45]

    Lotriˇ c, T

    T. Lotriˇ c, T. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, S. H. Simon, and S. A. Parameswaran, Majorana edge reconstruction and the ν = 5/2 non-abelian thermal hall puzzle, Supplementary material (2025)

    2025

  37. [46]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  38. [47]

    F. D. M. Haldane, ”hall viscosity” and intrinsic metric of incompressible fractional hall fluids, arxiv:0906.1854 (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  39. [48]

    X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig, General relationship between the entanglement spectrum and the edge state spectrum of topological quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196402 (2012)

    2012

  40. [49]

    K. K. W. Ma and D. E. Feldman, Thermal equilibration on the edges of topological liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 016801 (2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    Hein and C

    M. Hein and C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, Thermal conductance and noise of majorana modes along interfaced ν = 5 2 frac- tional quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245301 (2023)

    2023

  42. [51]

    R. L. Willett, K. Shtengel, C. Nayak, L. N. Pfeiffer, Y. J. Chung, M. L. Peabody, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Interference measurements of non-abelian e/4 &; abelian e/2 quasiparticle braiding, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011028 (2023)

    2023

  43. [52]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Topolog- ical characterization of fractional quantum hall ground states from microscopic hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 236801 (2013)

    2013

  44. [53]

    Assouline, T

    A. Assouline, T. Wang, H. Zhou, L. A. Cohen, F. Yang, R. Zhang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Energy gap of the even-denominator fractional quantum hall state in bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046603 (2024)

    2024

  45. [54]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 74, 1674–1677 (2005)

    2005

  46. [55]

    Merz and J

    F. Merz and J. T. Chalker, Two-dimensional random- bond ising model, free fermions, and the network model, Phys. Rev. B 65, 054425 (2002)

    2002

  47. [56]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Impurity scattering and transport of fractional quantum hall edge states, Phys. Rev. B 51, 13449 (1995)

    1995

  48. [58]

    K. K. W. Ma and D. E. Feldman, Partial equilibration of integer and fractional edge channels in the thermal quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 99, 085309 (2019)

    2019

  49. [59]

    Z.-X. Hu, E. H. Rezayi, X. Wan, and K. Yang, Edge- mode velocities and thermal coherence of quantum hall interferometers, Phys. Rev. B 80, 235330 (2009)

    2009

  50. [60]

    Nosiglia, J

    C. Nosiglia, J. Park, B. Rosenow, and Y. Gefen, Incoher- ent transport on the ν = 2/3 quantum hall edge, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115408 (2018)

    2018

  51. [61]

    K. K. Ma, M. R. Peterson, V. Scarola, and K. Yang, Frac- tional quantum hall effect at the filling factor ν = 5/2, in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics(Elsevier,

  52. [2024]

    Majorana edge reconstruction and theν = 5/2 non-Abelian thermal Hall puzzle

    pp. 324–365. 1 Supplementary Material for:“Majorana edge reconstruction and theν = 5/2 non-Abelian thermal Hall puzzle” I. DMRG CALCULA TION A. Setup Step 1—Bulk ground states.We work on an infinitely long cylinder of circumference Lx = 18ℓB. Metallic screening planes at z = ±...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.