Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Astrocyte-Mediated Higher-Order Control of Synaptic Plasticity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single astrocyte controlling multiple internal synapses stabilizes recurrent circuits against self-sustained activity and preserves stimulus encoding.

desk verdict A clearly specified astrocyte-STP model with a plausible higher-order stabilization result, but the paper overclaims that low-order schemes cannot replicate it based on a narrow parameter scan. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07693 v1 pith:FKR67LGA submitted 2025-07-10 q-bio.NC cond-mat.dis-nn

Gustavo Menesse , Ana P. Millán , Joaquín J. Torres This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NCcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords astrocytetripartitesynapseshort-termplasticityhigher-orderinteractionsrecurrentneuralcircuitsself-sustainedactivitygliotransmission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Astrocytes are proposed to act as higher-order controllers of synaptic transmission: one astrocyte monitors and modulates several synapses at once, coupling their short-term plasticity dynamics. In a minimal recurrent loop of three excitatory neurons, this higher-order modulation prevents the self-sustained runaway activity that otherwise makes the circuit insensitive to external stimuli. The paper builds a short-term plasticity model in which astrocyte gliotransmission and presynaptic facilitation jointly set the neurotransmitter release probability, generalizing standard dynamic-synapse models. Simulations show that the stabilizing effect is strongest when a single astrocyte modulates the two internal synapses, and that it cannot be reproduced by boosting calcium responses in low-order, one-synapse-per-astrocyte schemes. If true, this offers a plausible mechanism by which glial cells could keep recurrent circuits responsive without inhibitory feedback.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a coupled astrocyte-synapse-neuron short-term plasticity model (ASN-STP). The release probability at each synapse is written as a first-order expansion $$u_{ij}^{a} = U_{SE} + (\varepsilon-U_{SE})\$gamma^{{a}}$_{ij,\mathrm{astro}} + (1-U_{SE})\$gamma^{{a}}$_{ij,\mathrm{pre}},$$ where $\gamma_{ij,\mathrm{astro}}$ and $\gamma_{ij,\mathrm{pre}}$ are the fractions of receptors activated by gliotransmission and by presynaptic facilitation. Astrocyte calcium rises through IP$_3$ produced at each adjacent synapse, and when it crosses $Ca_{\mathrm{th}}$ the astrocyte continuously releases gliotransmitter, lowering release probability when $\varepsilon<U_{SE}$. The parameter $\alpha$ sets how much neurotransmitter stays in the cleft versus being recruited by the astrocyte. The higher-order effect comes from the summation of IP$_3$ over several synapses into a single astrocyte: integration makes activation faster and coordinated, producing simultaneous modulation across all adjacent synapses, which low-order schemes cannot mimic by diffusion or parameter tuning.

What would settle it

Run the same three-neuron ring with a saturating nonlinear gliotransmission term (for example, one whose effect levels off at high calcium levels) in place of the linear expansion in Eq. (11). If the internal-synapse higher-order scheme no longer yields the largest adequate-response interval, the claimed advantage is an artifact of the linear approximation rather than a property of higher-order astrocyte control.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that higher-order astrocyte interactions—where one astrocyte regulates multiple synapses simultaneously—strongly stabilize the dynamics of recurrent excitatory circuits and expand the parameter region in which the circuit tracks external stimulation. Focusing on depressive gliotransmission ($\varepsilon < U_{SE}$), the authors show in a directed ring of three leaky integrate-and-fire neurons that even a single tripartite synapse shrinks the self-sustained-activity (SSA) region in the ($\alpha$, stimulus-frequency) plane; the largest adequate-response interval, with the smoothest input-output tuning, is obtained when one astrocyte controls the internal synapses $1\to2$ and $2\to3$. The benefit is specific to higher-order aggregation: retuning calcium-related parameters or coupling low-order astrocytes through gap junctions does not reproduce it. The result extends to cycles of five and twenty neurons, where the optimal scheme is an astrocyte that modulates the recurrence synapse from read-out back to read-in together with one internal synapse. The authors interpret this as evidence that astrocyte modulation is not merely local but acts as a system-level, higher-order regulatory structure in recurrent circuits.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that an astrocyte's effect on release probability can be described by a smooth linear adjustment around the baseline release probability, and that this adjustment stays accurate no matter how strongly the circuit is driven.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Even a single astrocyte-modulated synapse extends the $\alpha$ range in which the circuit responds proportionally to stimulus frequency and suppresses the self-sustained-activity regime.
  • The largest adequate-response interval and smoothest rate-versus-frequency tuning occur when one astrocyte modulates the internal synapses $1\to2$ and $2\to3$, not when all three synapses are modulated.
  • Higher-order modulation cannot be replicated by increasing $\beta$ or lowering $Ca_{\mathrm{th}}$ in low-order schemes, nor by coupling low-order astrocytes through gap junctions.
  • In larger cycles, modulation of the recurrence synapse from read-out back to read-in is required for optimal responsiveness.
  • The ASN-STP model reduces to the standard dynamic-synapse model when gliotransmission is absent and to the astrocyte-driven model when presynaptic facilitation is absent, unifying both frameworks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism holds, recurrent brain regions such as the hippocampus could use astrocyte territory overlap as a stability mechanism that complements inhibitory feedback, with different failure modes.
  • A testable consequence we draw is that synapses on recurrent internal pathways should be more sensitive to astrocyte perturbation than input synapses; silencing astrocyte signaling on internal versus input connections would discriminate.
  • The linear expansion suggests a quantitative experimental target: measuring presynaptic release probability as a function of astrocyte calcium level would reveal whether circuits actually operate in the assumed linear regime.
  • The framework suggests a design principle for neuromorphic or reservoir computing circuits: placing a shared modulatory element over recurrent connections, rather than input connections, should improve stable signal propagation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a tripartite-synapse short-term plasticity model (ASN-STP) in which astrocyte calcium dynamics and presynaptic activity jointly control the neurotransmitter release probability u. The model is shown to reduce to the Tsodyks-Markram and De Pittà-Brunel models in appropriate limits. The authors apply the model to a directed ring of three leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with one externally stimulated neuron, comparing configurations with no astrocyte, one astrocyte per synapse (low order), and one astrocyte modulating multiple synapses (higher order). They report that higher-order astrocyte modulation, especially when a single astrocyte controls the two internal synapses (2→3 and 3→1), suppresses self-sustained activity (SSA), enlarges the 'adequate response interval' of the read-out neuron, and produces smoother input-output tuning than low-order schemes. They further claim that these benefits cannot be reproduced by amplifying low-order astrocyte drive or by diffusive gap-junction coupling of low-order astrocytes, and they present supporting simulations for N=5 and N=20 cycles.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted, the paper offers a concrete mechanism by which astrocyte-mediated higher-order interactions stabilize recurrent excitatory circuits and preserve stimulus encoding, bridging higher-order network theory and glial biology. The model is clearly specified and the reductions to previous models are checked in the Supplementary Information; the SSA transition boundary is derived from an explicit criterion (Supp. Eq. S.4) and validated against simulations, which is a notable strength. The paper also generates falsifiable predictions, e.g., that astrocyte modulation of internal synapses but not the input synapse expands the responsive regime. However, the generality of the main quantitative claims is tempered by the narrow parameter search supporting the 'cannot be replicated' conclusion and by the informal definition of the adequate-response interval.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.C, Fig. 5] The claim that the benefits of higher-order modulation 'cannot be replicated' by low-order schemes rests on a parameter scan that varies only β∈{0.05,0.1,0.15} and Ca_th∈{0.02,0.04} for the two-astrocyte configuration, with U_astro=0.1, τ_f,astro=5000 ms, ε=0.01, and all synaptic parameters fixed at their Table I defaults. This covers only a small slice of the low-order parameter space and forces the two low-order astrocytes to be symmetric. The model does not prohibit, for example, a low-order astrocyte on synapse 3→1 with a larger U_astro or a smaller τ_f,astro than the astrocyte on 2→3, which could emulate the slow asymmetric modulation characteristic of the higher-order scheme. Unless the authors either (i) perform a systematic search over astrocyte and synaptic parameters, including heterogeneous low-order configurations, or (ii) provide a mechanistic argument (e.g., based on the number of integrated inputs) that rules out such emulation, the conclusion that the advantage arises from higher-order interaction topology rather than from effective astrocyte drive is not established. This is load-bearing because the Introduction and Discussion advance the higher-order interpretation as the paper's main result.
  2. [§III.B, Figs. 3–4] The 'adequate response interval' is defined qualitatively as the range of α for which the read-out neuron 'responds proportionally' to stimulus frequencies and for which the circuit is not in the SSA regime. Neither the proportionality criterion nor the interval endpoints are specified quantitatively, and Figure 4's 'smoothness' assessment relies on visual inspection. Because the central quantitative claim—that the higher-order internal-synapse scheme (Fig. 3e/4e) yields the largest adequate-response interval and the smoothest tuning—depends on this definition, I recommend providing an explicit algorithm or a quantitative measure (e.g., a linear-regression R² or coefficient-of-variation threshold) and reporting the computed interval for each panel.
  3. [§II.B.1, Eqs. (5) and (11)] The model is justified as a first-order Taylor expansion of u(γ_astro, γ_pre) around the steady state, and Eq. (11) then defines u as exactly this linear expression. The paper does not report the actual ranges of γ_astro and γ_pre reached in the simulations, nor does it test whether a saturating nonlinear functional form would alter the phase diagrams. Since the quantitative predictions (SSA boundary, adequate-response interval) are derived from this specific functional form, the linearity assumption is load-bearing. I suggest either adding a sensitivity analysis with a saturating alternative, e.g., u = U_SE + (ε−U_SE) γ_astro/(1+γ_astro) + (1−U_SE) γ_pre/(1+γ_pre), or explicitly discussing the limitations of the linear form in the Discussion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Intro., end of Section I] The phrase 'In resume' should be 'In summary' (or 'In conclusion'), and there is a typo 'triparte-synapse' in the second paragraph of the Introduction.
  2. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption lists 'a single astrocyte modulating three internal synapses (panel c); all four internal synapses (panel c)'—the second 'panel c' should refer to a different panel (likely panel b), and the panel letters in the caption should be checked against the figure.
  3. [§III.C and Fig. 5 caption] The references to 'eq. II C' are ambiguous; the calcium dynamics are given in Eq. (17), and the text and caption should cite the equation number directly rather than the section label.
  4. [Throughout] The notation for the calcium threshold is inconsistent: 'Ca_th' in the main text and Table I, but 'Cathr' and 'Cath' appear in Supplementary Figures D and the text near Eqs. (8)–(9). Please unify the notation.
  5. [§III.F, Fig. 8 panel labels] In the text describing Figure 8, the sentence 'when the astrocyte modulates all synapses but this one (n=4 interacting synapses, panel b)' is contradicted by the caption's labeling; please correct the panel references so that the number of modulated synapses matches the stated scheme.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model's equations are stated assumptions with explicit reductions to prior work, and the main comparative results are simulation-based rather than being defined in terms of the quantities they claim to predict.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation is self-contained in the sense that the ASN-STP model is constructed from explicit dynamical equations (Eqs. 1, 4, 8-17), with the reduction to the Tsodyks-Markram model and to the De Pittà-Brunel model demonstrated in Supplementary Section I. No parameter is fitted to a target result and then renamed as a prediction. The higher-order advantage does follow structurally from Eq. 16, where total IP3 is defined as a sum over all synapses adjacent to an astrocyte, so a higher-order astrocyte receives more input and hence produces stronger gliotransmission; however, this is a stated modeling assumption, not a hidden equivalence between input and output. The paper explicitly anticipates the concern that the higher-order benefit might be only a calcium-scaling effect and addresses it directly in Section III.C and Figure 5 by scanning beta and Ca_th in the low-order scheme. The narrowness of that scan is a legitimate robustness limitation, but it is not circularity: the claim 'low-order schemes cannot replicate the higher-order effect' is an empirical simulation result, not a definitional identity. The SSA transition line is derived from an independent analytical condition in Supplementary Section IV and then validated by simulations above and below the line. Author self-citations (e.g., Refs. [1], [10], [34], [84]) are used for framing, terminology, and inspiration rather than as load-bearing evidence for the quantitative phase diagrams. No self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem forces the paper's conclusions. Therefore, while the generality of the negative claim about low-order schemes could be questioned on correctness grounds, no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model's central claims depend on several hand-set parameters (alpha, epsilon, beta, Ca_th, time constants) and on the linear expansion assumption for the release probability. These are not fitted to data, and the paper does not provide an independent experimental validation. The entities are standard modeling constructs, and the only new entity is the specific combined model. The free parameters are not fitted to data in a circular sense, but the results are scanned over them.

free parameters (8)
  • alpha = 0.25 to 0.975
    Control parameter representing the fraction of neurotransmitters remaining in the synaptic cleft; scanned across a range, not fit to data. It is a free parameter of the model.
  • epsilon = 0.01 to 0.2
    Astrocyte facilitation modulation parameter; chosen by hand, most results use epsilon=0.01 with U_SE=0.1, i.e., negative modulation. Not fitted to data.
  • U_SE = 0.1
    Steady-state release probability, inherited from Tsodyks-Markram and set by hand; not fitted.
  • U_astro = 0.1
    Steady-state gliotransmitter release probability, inherited from De Pitta-Brunel; set by hand.
  • beta = 0.05 to 0.15 1/ms
    Calcium increase rate via IP3; scanned in Figure 5, not measured. Free parameter.
  • Ca_th = 0.02 to 0.04 uM
    Gliorelease calcium threshold; scanned in Figure 5, not measured. Free parameter.
  • tau_f_astro = 5000 ms
    Astrocyte facilitation time constant; set by hand, not fit.
  • tau_f_pre = 200 ms
    Pre-synaptic facilitation time constant; set by hand, not fit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model with threshold, reset, and refractory period
    Standard simplified neuron model; assumed without justification beyond being a common modeling choice.
  • ad hoc to paper First-order Taylor expansion of u(gamma_astro, gamma_pre) around (0,0) is valid across the full range of gamma values reached in simulations
    Introduced to define u (Eq. 5, 11); the paper bounds gamma_astro+gamma_pre <= 1 but the linear extrapolation away from (0,0) is an unvalidated modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption Astrocyte calcium dynamics follows a simplified linear IP3-driven equation with effective exponential decay and instantaneous IP3 diffusion to soma
    This is a deliberate simplification of detailed astrocyte models, stated by the authors and needed for the tractable model.
  • ad hoc to paper Gliotransmitter release is a continuous process whenever calcium exceeds the threshold Ca_th
    The authors state this choice explicitly, contrasting with event-based models in Ref. [43]; the validity of this assumption is not tested.
invented entities (1)
  • The ASN-STP model with continuous gliotransmitter release
    purpose: To model astrocyte-synapse-neuron short-term plasticity in a unified framework
    A new modeling construct; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the model is offered.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Astrocyte-Mediated Higher-Order Control of Synaptic Plasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FKR67LGA

@misc{pith2026250707693,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Astrocyte-Mediated Higher-Order Control of Synaptic Plasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FKR67LGA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07693}
}
read the original abstract

The dynamics of higher-order topological signals are increasingly recognized as a key aspect of the activity of complex systems. A paradigmatic example are synaptic dynamics: synaptic efficacy changes over time driven by different mechanisms. Beyond traditional node-driven short-term plasticity mechanisms, the role of astrocyte modulation through higher-order interactions, in the so-called tripartite synapse, is increasingly recognized. However, the competition and interplay between node-driven and higher-order mechanisms have yet to be considered. Here, we introduce a simple higher-order model of the tripartite synapse accounting for astrocyte-synapse-neuron interactions in short-term plasticity. In the model, astrocyte gliotransmission and pre-synaptic intrinsic facilitation mechanisms jointly modulate the probability of neurotransmitter release at the synapse, generalizing previous short-term plasticity models. We investigate the implications of such mechanisms in a minimal recurrent motif -- a directed ring of three excitatory leaky integrate-and-fire neurons -- where one neuron receives external stimulation that propagates through the circuit. Due to its strong recurrence, the circuit is highly prone to self-sustained activity, which can make it insensitive to external input. By introducing higher-order interactions among different synapses through astrocyte modulation, we show that higher-order modulation robustly stabilizes circuit dynamics and expands the parameter space that supports stimulus-driven activity. Our findings highlight a plausible mechanism by which astrocytes can reshape effective connectivity and enhance information processing through higher-order structural interactions -- even in the simplest recurrent circuits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07693 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamic Synaptic Modulation of LMG Qubits populations in a Bio-Inspired Quantum Brain

    quant-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A collective all-to-all qubit model with a synaptic-depression-style feedback loop is shown numerically to regulate its population around half-filling and to slow its collective oscillations as feedback strength grows.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    utilization

    Short-term facilitation: node- and astrocyte-driven mechanisms To model STF when both pre-synaptic and gliotransmission mechanisms are present, we extend the strategy presented in Ref. [43]. Firstly, we hypothesize thatu a ij(t) depends on the fraction of receptors and channels activated by a) gliotransmission and b) pre-synaptic activity, namelyγ a ij,as...

  2. [2]

    adequate

    Resource depletion Due to resource depletion, neither neurotransmission nor gliotransmission can occur indefinitely under repeated stimulation. To model this, we consider a depression mechanism such that the fraction of available neurotransmitters and gliotransmitters decreases with each release event. The former is implemented via a short-term depression...

  3. [3]

    Higher-order organization of multivariate time series.Nature Physics, 19(2):221–229, 2023

    Andrea Santoro, Federico Battiston, Giovanni Petri, and Enrico Amico. Higher-order organization of multivariate time series.Nature Physics, 19(2):221–229, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Mill´ an, Hanlin Sun, Lorenzo Giambagli, Riccardo Muolo, Timoteo Carletti, Joaqu ´ ın J

    Ana P. Mill´ an, Hanlin Sun, Lorenzo Giambagli, Riccardo Muolo, Timoteo Carletti, Joaqu ´ ın J. Torres, Filippo Radicchi, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Ginestra Bianconi. Topology shapes dynamics of higher-order networks.Nature Physics, 21:353–361, 3 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Edges in brain networks: Contributions to models of structure and function.Network Neuroscience, 6(1):1–28, 2022

    Joshua Faskowitz, Richard F Betzel, and Olaf Sporns. Edges in brain networks: Contributions to models of structure and function.Network Neuroscience, 6(1):1–28, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Non-reversibility outperforms functional connectivity in characterisation of brain states in meg data.NeuroIm- age, 276:120186, 2023

    Prejaas KB Tewarie, Rikkert Hindriks, Yi Ming Lai, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos, Morten Kringelbach, and Gustavo Deco. Non-reversibility outperforms functional connectivity in characterisation of brain states in meg data.NeuroIm- age, 276:120186, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Andrea Santoro, Federico Battiston, Maxime Lucas, Giovanni Petri, and Enrico Amico. Higher-order connectomics of human brain function reveals local topological signatures of task decoding, individual identification, and behavior.Nature Communications, 15(1):10244, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Emergence of high-order functional hubs in the human brain.bioRxiv, pages 2023–02, 2023

    Fernando AN Santos, Prejaas KB Tewarie, Pierre Baudot, Antonio Luchicchi, Danillo Barros de Souza, Guillaume Girier, Ana P Milan, Tommy Broeders, Eduarda GZ Centeno, Rodrigo Cofre, et al. Emergence of high-order functional hubs in the human brain.bioRxiv, pages 2023–02, 2023

    2023

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics

    Federico Battiston, Giulia Cencetti, Iacopo Iacopini, et al. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 874:1–92, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Random walks on simplicial complexes and the normalized hodge 1-laplacian.SIAM Review, 62(2):353–391, 2020

    Michael T Schaub, Austin R Benson, Paul Horn, Gabor Lippner, and Ali Jadbabaie. Random walks on simplicial complexes and the normalized hodge 1-laplacian.SIAM Review, 62(2):353–391, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Topological signal processing over simplicial complexes.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 68:2992–3007, 2020

    Sergio Barbarossa and Stefania Sardellitti. Topological signal processing over simplicial complexes.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 68:2992–3007, 2020. 20

    2020

  4. [12]

    Topological data analysis of task-based fmri data from experiments on schizophrenia.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2:035006, 05 2021

    Bernadette Stolz, Tegan Emerson, Satu Nahkuri, Mason Porter, and Heather Harrington. Topological data analysis of task-based fmri data from experiments on schizophrenia.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2:035006, 05 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Spatio-temporal activity patterns induced by triadic interactions in an in silico neural medium.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 6(1):015017, mar 2025

    Ana P Mill´ an, Hanlin Sun, and Joaqu ´ ın J Torres. Spatio-temporal activity patterns induced by triadic interactions in an in silico neural medium.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 6(1):015017, mar 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Neighbourhood topology unveils pathological hubs in the brain networks of epilepsy-surgery patients.medRxiv, pages 2024–10, 2024

    Leonardo Di Gaetano, Fernando AN Santos, Federico Battiston, Ginestra Bianconi, Nicolo Defenu, Ida Nissen, Elisa- beth CW van Straaten, Arjan Hillebrand, and Ana P Mill´ an. Neighbourhood topology unveils pathological hubs in the brain networks of epilepsy-surgery patients.med...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Learning with hypergraphs: Clustering, classification, and embedding

    Dengyong Zhou, Jiayuan Huang, and Bernhard Scholkopf. Learning with hypergraphs: Clustering, classification, and embedding. InNeurIPS, 2006

    2006

  8. [16]

    Torres, A.S

    L. Torres, A.S. Blevins, D. Bassett, and T. Eliassi-Rad. The why, how, and when of representations for complex systems. SIAM Review, 63(3):435–485, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Distinguishing simple and complex contagion processes on networks.Physical Review Letters, 130(24):247401, 2023

    Giulia Cencetti, Diego Andr´ es Contreras, Marco Mancastroppa, and Alain Barrat. Distinguishing simple and complex contagion processes on networks.Physical Review Letters, 130(24):247401, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Fc–hat: hypergraph attention network for functional brain network classifi- cation.Information Sciences, 608:1301–1316, 2022

    Junzhong Ji, Yating Ren, and Minglong Lei. Fc–hat: hypergraph attention network for functional brain network classifi- cation.Information Sciences, 608:1301–1316, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Topological signal processing over generalized cell complexes.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2024

    Stefania Sardellitti and Sergio Barbarossa. Topological signal processing over generalized cell complexes.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Dynamic hypergraph structure learning for traffic flow forecasting

    Yusheng Zhao, Xiao Luo, Wei Ju, Chong Chen, Xian-Sheng Hua, and Ming Zhang. Dynamic hypergraph structure learning for traffic flow forecasting. In2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 2303–2316. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Facilitation and depression at single central synapses.Neuron, 14(4):795–802, 1995

    Charles F Stevens and Yanyan Wang. Facilitation and depression at single central synapses.Neuron, 14(4):795–802, 1995

    1995

  14. [22]

    A survey on hypergraph representation learning.ACM Computing Surveys, 56(1):1–38, 2023

    Alessia Antelmi, Gennaro Cordasco, Mirko Polato, Vittorio Scarano, Carmine Spagnuolo, and Dingqi Yang. A survey on hypergraph representation learning.ACM Computing Surveys, 56(1):1–38, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    L. F. Abbott and Wade G. Regehr. Synaptic computation.Nature, 431:796–803, 10 2004

    2004

  16. [24]

    Li and L.-S

    L. Li and L.-S. Chin. The molecular machinery of synaptic vesicle exocytosis.Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 60:942–960, 5 2003

    2003

  17. [25]

    Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons.Nature, 382:807–810, 8 1996

    Henry Markram and Misha Tsodyks. Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons.Nature, 382:807–810, 8 1996

    1996

  18. [26]

    Lin and Richard H

    Richard C. Lin and Richard H. Scheller. Mechanisms of synaptic vesicle exocytosis.Annual Review of Cell and Develop- mental Biology, 16:19–49, 11 2000

    2000

  19. [27]

    Brain performance versus phase transitions.Scientific Reports, 5(1):12216, July 2015

    Joaqu ´ ın J Torres and J Marro. Brain performance versus phase transitions.Scientific Reports, 5(1):12216, July 2015

    2015

  20. [28]

    Neural networks with dynamic synapses.Neural Computation, 10:821–835, 5 1998

    Misha Tsodyks, Klaus Pawelzik, and Henry Markram. Neural networks with dynamic synapses.Neural Computation, 10:821–835, 5 1998

    1998

  21. [29]

    Torres and Hilbert J

    Joaquin J. Torres and Hilbert J. Kappen. Emerging phenomena in neural networks with dynamic synapses and their computational implications.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, Volume 7 - 2013, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    Sanzgiri, and Philip G

    Alfonso Araque, Vladimir Parpura, Rita P. Sanzgiri, and Philip G. Haydon. Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner.Trends in Neurosciences, 22:208–215, 5 1999

    1999

  23. [31]

    Torres, and Joaqu ´ ın Marro

    Jorge Pretel, Joaqu ´ ın J. Torres, and Joaqu ´ ın Marro. Eegs disclose significant brain activity correlated with synaptic fickleness.Biology, 10(7), 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Gustavo Menesse and Joaqu ´ ın J. Torres. Information dynamics of in silico eeg brain waves: Insights into oscillations and functions.PLOS Computational Biology, 20(9):1–41, 09 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019

    Maurizio De Pitt` a and Hugues Berry.A Neuron–Glial Perspective for Computational Neuroscience, pages 3–35. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    De Pitt` a, N

    M. De Pitt` a, N. Brunel, and A. Volterra. Astrocytes: Orchestrating synaptic plasticity?Neuroscience, 323:43–61, 5 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    Astrocyte calcium signaling: the third wave.Nature Neuroscience, 19:182–189, 2 2016

    Narges Bazargani and David Attwell. Astrocyte calcium signaling: the third wave.Nature Neuroscience, 19:182–189, 2 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    Activity- dependent plasticity of axo-axonic synapses at the axon initial segment.Neuron, 106(2):265–276, 2020

    Alejandro Pan-Vazquez, Winnie Wefelmeyer, Victoria Gonzalez Sabater, Guilherme Neves, and Juan Burrone. Activity- dependent plasticity of axo-axonic synapses at the axon initial segment.Neuron, 106(2):265–276, 2020

    2020

  29. [37]

    Explosive higher-order kuramoto dynamics on simplicial complexes

    Ana P Mill´ an, Joaqu ´ ın J Torres, and Ginestra Bianconi. Explosive higher-order kuramoto dynamics on simplicial complexes. Physical Review Letters, 124(21):218301, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Axo-axonic synapses: Diversity in neural circuit function.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 529(9):2391–2401, 2021

    Kara K Cover and Brian N Mathur. Axo-axonic synapses: Diversity in neural circuit function.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 529(9):2391–2401, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Springer US, New York, NY, 2024

    Kerstin Lenk, Audrey Denizot, Barbara Genocchi, Ippa Sepp¨ al¨ a, Marsa Taheri, and Suhita Nadkarni.Computational Models of Astrocyte Function at Glutamatergic Synapses, pages 229–263. Springer US, New York, NY, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    The dynamic nature of percolation on networks with triadic interactions.Nature Communications, 14(1):1308, 2023

    Hanlin Sun, Filippo Radicchi, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Ginestra Bianconi. The dynamic nature of percolation on networks with triadic interactions.Nature Communications, 14(1):1308, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Specialized astrocytes mediate glutamatergic gliotransmission in the cns.Nature, 622:120–129, 10 2023

    Roberta de Ceglia, Ada Ledonne, David Gregory Litvin, Barbara Lykke Lind, Giovanni Carriero, Emanuele Claudio Latagliata, Erika Bindocci, Maria Amalia Di Castro, Iaroslav Savtchouk, Ilaria Vitali, Anurag Ranjak, Mauro Congiu, Tara Canonica, William Wisden, Kenneth Harris, Manu...

    2023

  34. [42]

    Gaba from reactive astrocytes impairs memory in mouse models of alzheimer’s disease.Nature Medicine, 20:886–896, 8 2014

    Seonmi Jo, Oleg Yarishkin, Yu Jin Hwang, Ye Eun Chun, Mijeong Park, Dong Ho Woo, Jin Young Bae, Taekeun Kim, Jaekwang Lee, Heejung Chun, Hyun Jung Park, Da Yong Lee, Jinpyo Hong, Hye Yun Kim, Soo-Jin Oh, Seung Ju Park, Hyo Lee, Bo-Eun Yoon, YoungSoo Kim, Yong Jeong, Insop Shim...

    2014

  35. [43]

    Astrocyte-dependent slow inward currents (sics) participate in neuromodulatory mecha- nisms in the pedunculopontine nucleus (ppn).Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11, 2 2017

    Adrienn Kov´ acs and Bal´ azs P´ al. Astrocyte-dependent slow inward currents (sics) participate in neuromodulatory mecha- nisms in the pedunculopontine nucleus (ppn).Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11, 2 2017. 21

    2017

  36. [44]

    N´ an´ asi, and Bal´ azs P´ al

    Andrea Csemer, Adrienn Kov´ acs, Baneen Maamrah, Krisztina Pocsai, Krist´ of Korp´ as,´Almos Klekner, P´ eter Sz¨ ucs, P´ eter P. N´ an´ asi, and Bal´ azs P´ al. Astrocyte- and nmda receptor-dependent slow inward currents differently contribute to synaptic plasticity in an age...

    2023

  37. [45]

    Endocannabinoids mediate neuron-astrocyte communication.Neuron, 57:883–893, 3 2008

    Marta Navarrete and Alfonso Araque. Endocannabinoids mediate neuron-astrocyte communication.Neuron, 57:883–893, 3 2008

    2008

  38. [46]

    Multiple forms of working memory emerge from synapse–astrocyte interactions in a neuron–glia network model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, 10 2022

    Maurizio De Pitt` a and Nicolas Brunel. Multiple forms of working memory emerge from synapse–astrocyte interactions in a neuron–glia network model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, 10 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Astrocyte and neuron cooperation in long-term depression.Trends in Neurosciences, 44:837–848, 10 2021

    Caitlin Durkee, Paulo Kofuji, Marta Navarrete, and Alfonso Araque. Astrocyte and neuron cooperation in long-term depression.Trends in Neurosciences, 44:837–848, 10 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    From in silico astrocyte cell models to neuron- astrocyte network models: A review.Brain Research Bulletin, 136:76–84, 1 2018

    Franziska Oschmann, Hugues Berry, Klaus Obermayer, and Kerstin Lenk. From in silico astrocyte cell models to neuron- astrocyte network models: A review.Brain Research Bulletin, 136:76–84, 1 2018

    2018

  41. [50]

    Com- putational quest for understanding the role of astrocyte signaling in synaptic transmission and plasticity.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 2012

    Maurizio De Pitta’, Vladislav Volman, Hugues Berry, Vladimir Parpura, Andrea Volterra, and Eshel Ben-Jacob. Com- putational quest for understanding the role of astrocyte signaling in synaptic transmission and plasticity.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 2012

    2012

  42. [51]

    Hyttinen

    Kerstin Lenk, Eero Satuvuori, Jules Lallouette, Antonio Ladr´ on de Guevara, Hugues Berry, and Jari A.K. Hyttinen. A computational model of interactions between neuronal and astrocytic networks: The role of astrocytes in the stability of the neuronal firing rate.Frontiers in C...

    2020

  43. [52]

    Astrocyte-mediated spike-timing-dependent long-term depression modulates synaptic properties in the developing cortex.PLoS Computational Biology, 16, 11 2020

    Tiina Manninen, Ausra Saudargiene, and Marja Leena Linne. Astrocyte-mediated spike-timing-dependent long-term depression modulates synaptic properties in the developing cortex.PLoS Computational Biology, 16, 11 2020

    2020

  44. [53]

    Verisokin, Darya V

    Andrey Yu. Verisokin, Darya V. Verveyko, Dmitry E. Postnov, and Alexey R. Brazhe. Modeling of astrocyte networks: Toward realistic topology and dynamics.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 15, 3 2021

    2021

  45. [54]

    Tele˜ nczuk, Desdemona Fricker, and Richard Miles

    Caroline Le Duigou, Jean Simonnet, Maria T. Tele˜ nczuk, Desdemona Fricker, and Richard Miles. Recurrent synapses and circuits in the ca3 region of the hippocampus: an associative network.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 7, 2014

    2014

  46. [55]

    Tan and Cagla Eroglu

    Christabel X. Tan and Cagla Eroglu. Cell adhesion molecules regulating astrocyte–neuron interactions.Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 69:170–177, 8 2021

    2021

  47. [56]

    Rachel Ventura and Kristen M. Harris. Three-dimensional relationships between hippocampal synapses and astrocytes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19:6897–6906, 8 1999

    1999

  48. [57]

    A tale of two stories: Astrocyte regulation of synaptic depression and facilitation.PLoS Computational Biology, 7:e1002293, 12 2011

    Maurizio De Pitt` a, Vladislav Volman, Hugues Berry, and Eshel Ben-Jacob. A tale of two stories: Astrocyte regulation of synaptic depression and facilitation.PLoS Computational Biology, 7:e1002293, 12 2011

    2011

  49. [58]

    Sammons, Mourat Vezir, Laura Moreno-Velasquez, Gaspar Cano, Marta Orlando, Meike Sievers, Eleonora Grasso, Verjinia D

    Rosanna P. Sammons, Mourat Vezir, Laura Moreno-Velasquez, Gaspar Cano, Marta Orlando, Meike Sievers, Eleonora Grasso, Verjinia D. Metodieva, Richard Kempter, Helene Schmidt, and Dietmar Schmitz. Structure and function of the hippocampal ca3 module.Proceedings of the National A...

    2024

  50. [59]

    Allen and Cagla Eroglu

    Nicola J. Allen and Cagla Eroglu. Cell biology of astrocyte-synapse interactions.Neuron, 96:697–708, 11 2017

    2017

  51. [60]

    Long-lasting changes of calcium oscillations in astrocytes.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270:15203–15210, 6 1995

    Lucia Pasti, Tullio Pozzan, and Giorgio Carmignoto. Long-lasting changes of calcium oscillations in astrocytes.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270:15203–15210, 6 1995

    1995

  52. [61]

    Astrocytic processes: from tripartite synapses to the active milieu.Trends in Neurosciences, 44:781–792, 10 2021

    Alexey Semyanov and Alexei Verkhratsky. Astrocytic processes: from tripartite synapses to the active milieu.Trends in Neurosciences, 44:781–792, 10 2021

    2021

  53. [62]

    Haydon, St´ ephane H.R

    Alfonso Araque, Giorgio Carmignoto, Philip G. Haydon, St´ ephane H.R. Oliet, Richard Robitaille, and Andrea Volterra. Gliotransmitters travel in time and space.Neuron, 81:728–739, 2 2014

    2014

  54. [63]

    Meriney and Erika E

    Stephen D. Meriney and Erika E. Fanselow. Chapter 12 - metabotropic g-protein-coupled receptors and their cytoplas- mic signaling pathways. In Stephen D. Meriney and Erika E. Fanselow, editors,Synaptic Transmission, pages 245–273. Academic Press, 2019

    2019

  55. [64]

    Rodr ´ ıguez, and Vladimir Parpura

    Alexei Verkhratsky, Jos´ e J. Rodr ´ ıguez, and Vladimir Parpura. Calcium signalling in astroglia.Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 353:45–56, 4 2012

    2012

  56. [65]

    Astrocyte calcium signalling orchestrates neuronal synchronization in organotypic hippocampal slices.The Journal of Physiology, 592:2771–2783, 7 2014

    Takuya Sasaki, Tomoe Ishikawa, Reimi Abe, Ryota Nakayama, Akiko Asada, Norio Matsuki, and Yuji Ikegaya. Astrocyte calcium signalling orchestrates neuronal synchronization in organotypic hippocampal slices.The Journal of Physiology, 592:2771–2783, 7 2014

    2014

  57. [66]

    Jaquier, James King, Pramod Kumbhar, Caitlin Monney, Rodrigo Perin, Christian R¨ ossert, Anil M

    Giuseppe Chindemi, Marwan Abdellah, Oren Amsalem, Ruth Benavides-Piccione, Vincent Delattre, Michael Doron, Andr´ as Ecker, Aur´ elien T. Jaquier, James King, Pramod Kumbhar, Caitlin Monney, Rodrigo Perin, Christian R¨ ossert, Anil M. Tuncel, Werner Van Geit, Javier DeFelipe, ...

    2022

  58. [67]

    Coexis- tence of amplitude and frequency modulations in intracellular calcium dynamics.Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77, 3 2008

    Maurizio De Pitt` a, Vladislav Volman, Herbert Levine, Giovanni Pioggia, Danilo De Rossi, and Eshel Ben-Jacob. Coexis- tence of amplitude and frequency modulations in intracellular calcium dynamics.Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77, 3 2008

    2008

  59. [68]

    Michael Graupner and Nicolas Brunel. Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate, and dendritic location.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109:3991–3996, 3 2012

    2012

  60. [69]

    How critical is brain criticality?Trends in Neurosciences, 45(11):820–837, 2022

    Jordan O’Byrne and Karim Jerbi. How critical is brain criticality?Trends in Neurosciences, 45(11):820–837, 2022

    2022

  61. [70]

    Halassa and Philip G

    Michael M. Halassa and Philip G. Haydon. Integrated brain circuits: Astrocytic networks modulate neuronal activity and behavior.Annual Review of Physiology, 72:335–355, 3 2010

    2010

  62. [71]

    Kistler, Richard Naud, and Liam Paninski.Neuronal Dynamics: From Single Neurons to Networks and Models of Cognition

    Wulfram Gerstner, Werner M. Kistler, Richard Naud, and Liam Paninski.Neuronal Dynamics: From Single Neurons to Networks and Models of Cognition. Cambridge University Press, USA, 2014

    2014

  63. [72]

    Clarke and Ben A

    Laura E. Clarke and Ben A. Barres. Emerging roles of astrocytes in neural circuit development.Nature Reviews Neuro- science, 14:311–321, 5 2013

    2013

  64. [73]

    Protachevicz, Antonio M

    Paulo R. Protachevicz, Antonio M. Batista, Iberˆ e L. Caldas, and Murilo S. Baptista. Analytical solutions for the short-term plasticity.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 181:114678, 2024

    2024

  65. [74]

    Soria, Alfonso Araque, Juan Aguilar, and Juliana M

    Claudia Miguel-Quesada, Marta Zaforas, Salvador Herrera-P´ erez, Justin Lines, Elena Fern´ andez-L´ opez, Elena Alonso- Calvi˜ no, Maria Ardaya, Federico N. Soria, Alfonso Araque, Juan Aguilar, and Juliana M. Rosa. Astrocytes adjust the dynamic range of cortical network activi...

    2023

  66. [75]

    Astrocytes enhance plasticity response during reversal learning.Communications Biology, 7:852, 7 2024

    Lorenzo Squadrani, Carlos Wert-Carvajal, Daniel M¨ uller-Komorowska, Kirsten Bohmbach, Christian Henneberger, Pietro Verzelli, and Tatjana Tchumatchenko. Astrocytes enhance plasticity response during reversal learning.Communications Biology, 7:852, 7 2024

    2024

  67. [76]

    Astrocyte regulation of neural circuit activity and network states.Glia, 70:1455– 1466, 8 2022

    Jo˜ ao Filipe Oliveira and Alfonso Araque. Astrocyte regulation of neural circuit activity and network states.Glia, 70:1455– 1466, 8 2022

    2022

  68. [77]

    Zanetti, and Robert M

    Yusuke Ota, Alexander T. Zanetti, and Robert M. Hallock. The role of astrocytes in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and memory formation.Neural Plasticity, 2013:1–11, 2013

    2013

  69. [78]

    Programa Nacional de Becas de Postgrados en el Exterior “Don Carlos Antonio L´ opez

    aiming to capture the bidirectional interactions between astrocytes and neurons. Despite this momentum, relatively little effort has been made to analyze these neuron-astrocyte interactions from the perspective ofhigher-order interactions– that is, interactions that cannot be ...

  70. [79]

    Rˇ adulescu, Gabrielle C

    Anca R. Rˇ adulescu, Gabrielle C. Todd, Cassandra L. Williams, Benjamin A. Bennink, Alex A. Lemus, Haley E. Chesbro, Justin R. Bourgeois, Ashley M. Kopec, Damian G. Zuloaga, and Annalisa Scimemi. Estimating the glutamate transporter surface density in distinct sub-cellular com...

    2022

  71. [80]

    Chronic glutamate toxicity in neurodegenerative diseases-what is the evidence?Front

    Jan Lewerenz and Pamela Maher. Chronic glutamate toxicity in neurodegenerative diseases-what is the evidence?Front. Neurosci., 9:469, December 2015

    2015

  72. [81]

    Paniccia, James M

    Jacqueline E. Paniccia, James M. Otis, and Michael D. Scofield. Looking to the stars for answers: Strategies for determining how astrocytes influence neuronal activity.Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 20:4146–4156, 2022

    2022

  73. [82]

    Murray, Tiago P

    Federico Battiston, Enrico Amico, Alain Barrat, Ginestra Bianconi, Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, Benedetta Franceschiello, Iacopo Iacopini, Sonia K´ efi, Vito Latora, Yamir Moreno, Micah M. Murray, Tiago P. Peixoto, Francesco Vaccarino, and Giovanni Petri. The physics of higher-...

    2021

  74. [83]

    Simplicial models of social contagion.Nature communi- cations, 10(1):2485, 2019

    Iacopo Iacopini, Giovanni Petri, Alain Barrat, and Vito Latora. Simplicial models of social contagion.Nature communi- cations, 10(1):2485, 2019

    2019

  75. [84]

    Rosas, Pedro AM Mediano, Ibai Diez, Stephan P

    Marilyn Gatica, Fernando E. Rosas, Pedro AM Mediano, Ibai Diez, Stephan P. Swinnen, Patricio Orio, Rodrigo Cofr´ e, and Jesus M. Cortes. High-order functional redundancy in ageing explained via alterations in the connectome in a whole-brain model.PLoS computational biology, 18...

    2022

  76. [85]

    Dynamics of learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in rat hippocampal region ca3.The Journal of Neuroscience, 15:5249–5262, 7 1995

    ME Hasselmo, E Schnell, and E Barkai. Dynamics of learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in rat hippocampal region ca3.The Journal of Neuroscience, 15:5249–5262, 7 1995

    1995

  77. [86]

    Inhibitory stabilization and cortical computation.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22:21–37, 1 2021

    Sadra Sadeh and Claudia Clopath. Inhibitory stabilization and cortical computation.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22:21–37, 1 2021

    2021

  78. [87]

    Triadic percolation induces dynamical topological patterns in higher-order networks.PNAS Nexus, 3(7):pgae270, 07 2024

    Ana P Mill´ an, Hanlin Sun, Joaqu ´ ın J Torres, and Ginestra Bianconi. Triadic percolation induces dynamical topological patterns in higher-order networks.PNAS Nexus, 3(7):pgae270, 07 2024

    2024

  79. [88]

    Springer New York, New York, NY, 2020

    Maurizio De Pitt` a.Neuron-Glial Interactions, pages 1–30. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2020

    2020

  80. [89]

    The dynamic nature of percolation on networks with triadic interactions.Nature Communications, 14:1308, 3 2023

    Hanlin Sun, Filippo Radicchi, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Ginestra Bianconi. The dynamic nature of percolation on networks with triadic interactions.Nature Communications, 14:1308, 3 2023. 23 Supplementary Information Astrocyte-Mediated Higher-Order Control of Synaptic Plasticity Gus...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.