Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 7 cited by

Chiral superconductivity near a fractional Chern insulator

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Melting a fractional Chern insulator produces a chiral superconducting dome before the system turns metallic.

desk verdict A solid DMRG study showing FCI melting into a chiral SC dome and RIQH CDW, with an honest but load-bearing 2D extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07921 v2 pith:22OXFXUD submitted 2025-07-10 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Taige Wang , Michael P. Zaletel This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords fractionalCherninsulatorchiralsuperconductivityLuther-EmeryliquidlowestLandauleveldensitymatrixrenormalizationgroupchargewavere-entrantintegerquantumHalltwistedMoTe2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that melting a fractional Chern insulator, by increasing the bandwidth of a nearly ideal Chern band, produces a dome of chiral $f$-wave superconductivity and a nearly degenerate $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ charge-density wave with integer Hall conductance before the system becomes metallic. This gives a dopant-free microscopic route to spin-polarized chiral pairing from purely repulsive interactions, and it explains the close proximity of superconducting and re-entrant integer quantum Hall phases seen in twisted MoTe2 and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene. The claim matters because fully spin-polarized repulsive electrons were not previously established to form a superconductor; such a state is chiral and can host Majorana modes. The paper also makes two falsifiable experimental predictions: larger twist angles should bring superconductivity to $\nu = 2/3$, and a magnetic field should drive the superconductor into the competing integer Hall state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the triangular-lattice lowest-Landau-level model of Eq. (1): spinless electrons confined to the LLL with a triangular lattice potential of amplitude $V_m$ and one flux quantum per unit cell. After projection to the LLL, the single-particle dispersion is $\epsilon_k = V_m e^{-\pi/\sqrt{3}} \sum_j \cos(k\cdot a_j)$, so $V_m$ acts as a bandwidth knob that tunes the system from the flat-band FCI at small $V_m$ to a metal at large $V_m$. The argument is carried by infinite-cylinder DMRG using correlation lengths in four quantum-number sectors (neutral, single-electron, Cooper-pair, and density-wave) to locate phase boundaries, by the algebraic divergence of $\xi_{2e}$ with bond dimension, by a proxy gap function extracted from the MPS transfer matrix showing a $-6\pi$ winding, and by a parton construction $c = bf$ with the Chern-Simons Lagrangian of Eq. (5) that unifies the superconductor, the RIQH CDW, and the $\sigma_{xy} = 0$ CDW as descendants of the same FCI. The momentum quantization condition $e^{ik_y L_y} = (-1)^{L_y/a}$ explains why odd circumferences $L_y = 5a,7a$ host the superconductor while even circumferences $L_y = 6a,9a$ host the CDW.

What would settle it

A direct two-dimensional calculation at $\nu = 2/3$ that finds no superconducting dome between the FCI and the metal would falsify the claim, as would transport measurements on twisted MoTe2 at larger twist angles showing no superconducting dome at $\nu = 2/3$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a spinless lowest-Landau-level model on a triangular lattice with a tunable periodic potential, increasing the bandwidth first collapses the $\nu = 2/3$ fractional Chern insulator into a dome of chiral $f$-wave superconductivity and a nearly degenerate $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ charge-density wave with Hall conductance $\sigma_{xy} = e^2/h$, before the system becomes a metal. On cylinders of circumference $L_y = 5a$ and $7a$, the superconducting dome is a Luther-Emery liquid: single-electron correlations decay exponentially while Cooper-pair correlations decay as a power law with exponent $\eta < 1$, the pair correlation length $\xi_{2e}$ exceeds the single-electron length $\xi_{1e}$, and the central charge is about $1$. The momentum-resolved proxy gap function winds by $-6\pi$ around the Fermi pocket, indicating chiral $f \pm if$ pairing. The paper proposes that melting the FCI is a dopant-free, generic mechanism for the spin-polarized chiral superconductivity and re-entrant integer quantum Hall order observed in twisted MoTe2 and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene, and it predicts that larger twist angles will broaden the superconducting dome to $\nu = 2/3$ and that a magnetic field will drive the superconductor into the competing RIQH state.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quasi-one-dimensional Luther-Emery superconducting behavior seen on thin cylinders survives in true two dimensions, and that the BEC-to-BCS evolution is one continuous phase rather than an artifact of the cylinder's momentum quantization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the melt-the-FCI mechanism is correct, any spin-polarized Chern band with tunable bandwidth should show a superconducting dome as its FCI gap closes, making the FCI-to-metal boundary a natural place to search for chiral superconductivity.
  • The nearly degenerate superconducting and RIQH phases, with energy difference below one percent, imply that small perturbations such as doping, screening length, or lattice geometry can switch the ground state between them; the dome survives a gated Coulomb interaction, doping to $\nu = 11/15$, and a square lattice potential.
  • The chiral $f$-wave pairing with $-6\pi$ winding and weak-coupling Bogoliubov-de Gennes Chern number $C_{BdG} = -1$ predicts one chiral Majorana edge mode, making the dome a candidate platform for Majorana zero modes.
  • Experimentally, twisted MoTe2 at larger twist angles should develop a superconducting dome at $\nu = 2/3$ without carrier doping, and quenching that superconductivity with a magnetic field should reveal the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ re-entrant integer quantum Hall phase, which scanning tunnelling microscopy could detect as a density modulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dome is generic, then fractional Chern insulators in other spin-polarized moiré systems should show the same superconducting-versus-RIQH competition when their bandwidth is tuned, extending the prediction beyond twisted MoTe2 and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene.
  • The mismatch between the weak-coupling edge central charge $c_- = -1/2$ and the parton construction's $c_- = -2$ suggests that in two dimensions either the dome ends in a first-order transition to the FCI or the superconductor sheds three chiral Majorana modes; future numerics on the FCI-SC boundary could distinguish these options.
  • Because the cylinder quantization condition excludes $k_y = 0$ for odd $L_y/a$, the apparent continuity of the BEC-to-BCS evolution could be an artifact; a direct two-dimensional calculation or wider-cylinder study could reveal a transition inside the dome.
  • The close competition between superconductivity and the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ CDW at different circumferences suggests that in experiments, continuous tuning of strain or displacement field could navigate between the superconductor and the re-entrant integer quantum Hall state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a spinless lowest-Landau-level model on a cylinder with a tunable triangular-lattice potential. Using DMRG at filling ν=2/3 (and 11/15), it reports that as the lattice amplitude Vm increases, the fractional Chern insulator is replaced by a dome of chiral f-wave pairing with Luther-Emery liquid signatures—algebraic pair correlations with η≈0.9, Cooper-pair correlation length diverging with bond dimension while the single-electron length saturates, and central charge c≈1—and, on competing geometries, a √3×√3 charge-density wave with Hall conductance σxy=e^2/h. The paper interprets these phases as descendants of FCI melting, proposes a parton Chern-Simons field theory, and makes two experimental predictions for twisted MoTe2 and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene: larger twist angles broaden the superconducting dome, and a magnetic field strong enough to suppress superconductivity drives the system into the re-entrant integer quantum Hall phase.

Significance. If the two-dimensional extrapolation holds, this is an important result: it provides a concrete, dopant-free microscopic route from a repulsive spin-polarized Chern band to chiral superconductivity and competing re-entrant Hall order, with falsifiable experimental predictions. The work's strengths are its parameter-free DMRG computation on an explicit Hamiltonian, the mutually consistent set of diagnostics (pair correlator, correlation-length scaling with bond dimension, central charge, flux threading, momentum-resolved gap function), and the robustness checks against screened Coulomb interaction, doping, and lattice geometry. The manuscript is also unusually transparent about its limitations, explicitly flagging the cylinder-quantization concern. The main uncertainty is whether the quasi-1D Luther-Emery dome survives the two-dimensional limit and whether the BEC-to-BCS evolution is truly a single-phase crossover.

major comments (3)
  1. [§V, §VII, Fig. 4(c,d)] The central claim that the dome is a single chiral f-wave superconductor with a continuous BEC-BCS crossover in the two-dimensional limit is not established by the presented data. On the Ly=5a and 7a cylinders used for the main phase diagram, the quantization condition e^{ikyLy}=(-1)^{Ly/a} excludes ky=0 because Ly/a is odd, so the momentum point where a BEC-BCS gap closing would occur is avoided by construction. The authors explicitly concede in Section VII that the smooth crossover could be a 1D artifact and that gap closing at the Γ point could explain the large correlation lengths observed at Ly=4a and 8a. This concern is supported by Fig. 4(d), where the SC' state at Ly=4a (which includes ky=0) shows weak pairing at the ky=0 Fermi surface. Because the experimental predictions and the unified melt-the-FCI mechanism depend on the two-dimensional fate of the dome, the manuscript needs direct evidence on geometries that include ky=0 or a controlled extrapolation, e.g., flux threading to realize anti-periodic boundary conditions at Ly=4a and 8a, rather than relying on an acknowledged caveat.
  2. [Table I, Fig. 4(a)] The ground state inside the proposed dome region changes with cylinder circumference in a way that tracks the boundary condition: superconductor for Ly=5a and 7a, CDW for Ly=6a and 9a, and partially gapped SC' for Ly=4a and 8a. Since Ly=6a and 9a are commensurate with the √3×√3 CDW, the CDW could be a finite-size commensuration effect; however, the converse is equally plausible—namely that the SC on Ly=5a and 7a is stabilized by the anti-periodic boundary condition that removes ky=0. The energy difference between SC and CDW is reported as less than 10^-3 per flux and its sign changes with Vm (Fig. 4(a)), so the relative stability of the two competing descendants is not converged. The paper should provide a systematic circumference extrapolation or a boundary-condition control to show that both phases survive in the thermodynamic limit and that the claimed near-degeneracy is not a cylinder artifact.
  3. [§VII, Ref. [58]] The single-phase claim is in tension with the manuscript's own field-theoretic discussion. The text states that spin-polarized superconductors are expected to have half-integer c_- in the BCS limit and integer c_- in the BEC limit, apparently precluding a smooth crossover, and notes that the weak-coupling f-wave state has c_-=-1/2 while the parton construction yields c_-=-2. Two possible two-dimensional resolutions are proposed—shedding extra Majorana modes before reaching the metal, or a first-order transition into the FCI phase—but no numerical or analytical evidence is provided to select between them. If the BEC-to-BCS evolution is actually a transition rather than a crossover, the dome is not a single phase, and the prediction of a broadened superconducting dome at larger twist angles would need to be revised.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract vs. §VI, Fig. 4(a)] The abstract states that the SC and CDW energies differ by less than 1%, while Section VI and Fig. 4(a) report an energy difference per flux of less than 10^-3; please reconcile these numbers.
  2. [§II] The phrase 'Braivas vectors' should read 'Bravais vectors'.
  3. [§VI] The sentence 'which yields the the √3 × √3 modulation' contains a duplicated 'the'.
  4. [§VII] The word 'Suplementary' should be 'Supplementary'.
  5. [Fig. 1(b)] Please clarify whether the dashed phase-boundary curves at intermediate fillings are computed directly or merely interpolated between the two computed fillings ν=2/3 and ν=11/15.
  6. [§VII] The statements that the RIQH CDW coexists with neutral U(1)_-4 topological order and that the σxy=0 CDW hosts neutral semion order are parton-theory predictions not resolved by the present DMRG data; please label them explicitly as such throughout the discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the superconducting dome is a parameter-free DMRG result on an explicit LLL Hamiltonian, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central result is a parameter-free DMRG computation of the explicit spinless LLL Hamiltonian in Eq. (1), with the lattice amplitude Vm scanned as a physical control. Phase boundaries are diagnosed by correlation lengths in four quantum-number sectors (xi0e, xi1e, xi2e, xiCDW) and by the central charge c extracted from entanglement entropy; these are direct numerical observables, not quantities fitted to the experimental superconductivity or RIQH data. The experimental statements are qualitative mappings of model parameters to material knobs (larger twist angle means larger Vm/Coulomb ratio; magnetic field quenches SC and exposes RIQH), not constants extracted from target measurements. The self-citations are methodological or contextual: Refs. 30 and 52 support the ideal-band approximation, Ref. 48 supplies the proxy gap-function method, Ref. 55 is a field-theory comparison, and the unpublished Ref. 62 appears only in a speculative discussion of anyon composites and is not required for the numerical dome. The acknowledged Section VII limitation that the smooth BEC-to-BCS crossover 'could be a 1D-artifact from the ky momentum quantization on a cylinder' concerns the extrapolation of the cylinder calculation to 2D; it is an honest validity caveat, not a case where a result is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The quantization condition e^{ikyLy}=(-1)^{Ly/a} is a stated geometric property used to interpret the Ly=4a,8a data, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No equation is defined in terms of a quantity it is claimed to predict, and no fitted input is called a prediction. The derivation is self-contained against the numerical Hamiltonian, so there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The honest accounting: the phase-diagram result is computed from a stated Hamiltonian with one scanned control and no experimental fitting. What the reader does not pay for upstream is the interpretive layer: the parton Chern-Simons theory (Eq. 5), the cylinder-specific Bloch quantization, the ideal-geometry mapping to real materials, and the cylinder-to-2D extrapolation. None is machine-checked or independently reproduced, and the theory layer is internally inconsistent in one place (c- = -2 vs -1/2) by the authors' own admission.

free parameters (2)
  • Lattice potential amplitude Vm = Scanned over 0 to 5 in units of Haldane pseudopotential V1 = 1.
    The control parameter that creates the dome; it is a Hamiltonian coupling standing in for moire potential strength and is not fitted to reproduce experiments.
  • Fermionic parton Chern number Cf in Eq. (5) = Postulated values: -2 for the SC route, +2 for the RIQH route, 0 for the sigma_xy=0 CDW route.
    Hand-chosen integers that select which descendant phase the field theory describes; Cf is not measured, and the SC route's c-=-2 conflicts with the numerics-based weak-coupling count c-=-1/2 (Section VII).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Spinless LLL projection with ideal band geometry (uniform Berry curvature, vanishing trace condition) and an extra C2 symmetry faithfully represents the Chern bands of twisted MoTe2 and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene.
    Invoked in Section II for the experimental connection; real deviations are argued to be weak via Refs 29-32, and the C2 symmetry is admitted to be absent in the materials.
  • domain assumption The quasi-1D LE behavior on Ly=5a and 7a cylinders extrapolates to a 2D chiral superconductor, and the BEC-to-BCS evolution inside the dome is one continuous phase.
    Sections IV-VII; the authors concede the crossover could be a 1D artifact of ky quantization and that integer (BEC) vs half-integer (BCS) edge central charges appear to preclude a smooth 2D crossover.
  • domain assumption The magnetic Bloch-state gauge with C6|k> = |C6k> forces the quantization e^{ikyLy}=(-1)^{Ly/a}, which excludes ky=0 for odd Ly/a.
    Section V and Supplementary Material; the -6 pi winding (chiral f-if) and the low central charge in the dome are read under this construction, and the excluded ky=0 may be exactly where a BEC-BCS transition would close the gap.
  • standard math At Vm=0 the model is the Haldane nu=2/3 LLL liquid (FCI), and at large Vm the kinetic term dominates to form a Fermi surface.
    Section III; standard FQH hierarchy and free-fermion results used as the endpoints of the phase diagram.
invented entities (2)
  • Parton fields b and f with emergent internal gauge field a (Chern-Simons Lagrangian, Eq. 5)
    purpose: To explain FCI melting field-theoretically: Cf=-2 gives a chiral superconductor with edge central charge c-=-2, Cf=+2 gives the RIQH CDW, and Cf=0 gives a sigma_xy=0 CDW.
    The SC branch conflicts with the paper's own weak-coupling reading (c-=-1/2), differing by three chiral Majorana modes, so at most one description matches the microscopic phase; the emergent gapless gauge field is not directly probed by DMRG.
  • Neutral U(1)_{-4} topological order in the RIQH CDW, and a neutral semion order in the sigma_xy=0 CDW
    purpose: To give the CDW phases a topological-order fingerprint consistent with the parton construction.
    Section VII: 'our present DMRG data cannot yet resolve its presence'; no signature beyond the CDW periodicity itself is proposed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral superconductivity near a fractional Chern insulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/22OXFXUD

@misc{pith2026250707921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral superconductivity near a fractional Chern insulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/22OXFXUD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07921}
}
abstract

Superconductivity arising from fully spin-polarized, repulsively interacting electrons can host intrinsically chiral Cooper pairs and Majorana zero modes, yet no concrete microscopic route to such a state has been established. Motivated by recent observations in twisted homobilayer MoTe$_2$ and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene, where fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) appear adjacent to spin-valley-polarized superconductors, we investigate a minimal model: spinless electrons in the lowest Landau level subject to a tunable periodic potential. Large-scale density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations reveal that, as the FCI gap closes, two nearly degenerate phases emerge before the system turns metallic: a chiral $f$-wave superconductor and a $\sqrt{3} \times \sqrt{3}$ charge-density wave (CDW) whose energies differ by less than $1\%$. These two competing states mirror the superconducting and re-entrant integer quantum Hall (RIQH) phases observed experimentally near the FCI regime. The superconducting dome survives realistic Coulomb interaction, light doping, and various lattice geometry. Melting the FCI therefore provides a new mechanism for realizing spin-polarized chiral superconductivity and RIQH order. We predict that twisted MoTe$_2$ at larger twist angles will develop a superconducting dome even at filling $\nu = 2/3$, and suppressing this superconductivity with a magnetic field should drive the system into an RIQH state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07921 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. , the allowed ky values exclude the origin at ky = 0. Throughout the dome the phase of ∆˜ k winds by −6π around the hole-like Γ pocket ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chern-Simons-matter conformal field theory on fuzzy sphere: Confinement transition of Kalmeyer-Laughlin chiral spin liquid

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A fuzzy-sphere exact diagonalization study shows the fIQH to bFQH transition is continuous, with emergent conformal symmetry and a single relevant singlet of scaling dimension Delta_S = 1.52(18).

  2. Single-component twisted $\mathbb{Z}_3$ orthogonal metal in an $e/3$-anyon fluid

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Doping the nu=1/3 fractional Chern insulator can produce a twisted Z_3 orthogonal metal — a single hidden Fermi surface of emergent e/3 fermions — whose pairing yields superconductors with arbitrary chiral central cha...

  3. Repulsive-Interaction-Driven Topological Superconductivity in a Landau Level Coupled to an $s$-Wave Superconductor

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Repulsive interactions turn a half-filled Rashba-coupled Landau level proximitized by an s-wave superconductor into a topological superconductor.

  4. Quantum-Geometry-Induced Superconductivity near a Fractional Chern Insulator

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Interplay between fractional Chern insulator and anti-FCI scattering channels, enhanced by quantum geometry, generates an effective coupling that drives a superconducting instability adjacent to the FCI phase in a per...

  5. Color superconductors and holon metals from doping a Fractional Chern insulator

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Doping a C=1/3 fractional Chern insulator can produce charge-2e superconductors and holon metals described by a nine-pocket SU(3) parton theory.

  6. Non-Abelian topological superconductivity from melting Abelian fractional Chern insulators

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bandwidth tuning can melt a single ν=2/3 Jain fractional Chern insulator into five distinct superconductors, two with non-Abelian order, with higher-charge variants predicted at general Jain fillings.

  7. Continuous transition from Fermi liquid to A fractional Chern insulator

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critical theory is proposed for a continuous Fermi liquid to fractional Chern insulator transition at ν=2/3, predicting a high-temperature Hall resistivity near 3/2 h/e^2 on the Fermi liquid side.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    melt-the- FCI

    Superconductivity must therefore manifest as a Luther–Emery (LE) liquid [39, 40, 45]: single electrons are gapped, whereas Cooper pairs remain gapless. Consequently the single-electron Green’s function decays exponentially |⟨c†(X)c(0)⟩| ∝ e−X/ξ1e , while the pair correlator shows algebraic order |⟨∆†(X)∆(0)⟩| ∝X −η. The Luttinger parameter K = 1 /η sets t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Physical Review 108, 1175 (1957)

    work page 1957

  3. [3]

    Moriya and K

    T. Moriya and K. Ueda, Antiferromagnetic spin fluc- tuation and superconductivity, Reports on Progress in Physics 66, 1299 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Rossat-Mignod, L

    J. Rossat-Mignod, L. P. Regnault, C. Vettier, P. Bourges, P. Burlet, J. Bossy, J.-Y. Henry, and G. Lapertot, Neutron scattering study of the YBa 2Cu3O6+x system, Physica C: Superconductivity 185–189, 86 (1991)

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    D. J. Scalapino, The case for dx2−y2 pairing in the cuprate superconductors, Physics Reports 250, 329 (1995)

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    G. E. Volovik, Fermion zero modes on vortices in chiral superconductors, JETP Letters 70, 609 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Vollhardt and P

    D. Vollhardt and P. W¨ olfle, The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 , corrected reprint of the 1990 ed. ed. (Courier Corporation, 2013)

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect, Physical Review B 61, 10267 (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. D. Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum 8 computation, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Xu, et al. , Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, X. Xu, et al. , Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, K. F. Mak, J. Shan, et al. , Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature 622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, et al. , Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Physical Review X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, L. Ju, et al. , Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Lei, X. Liu, and T. Li, Signatures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous hall insula...

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, L. Ju, et al. , Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 643, 654 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Geier, M

    M. Geier, M. Davydova, and L. Fu, Chiral and topo- logical superconductivity in isospin polarized multilayer graphene, arXiv:2409.13829 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Y.-Z. Chou, J. Zhu, and S. D. Sarma, Intravalley spin- polarized superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, Physical Review B 111, 174523 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Parra-Martinez, A

    G. Parra-Martinez, A. Jimeno-Pozo, V. T. Phong, H. Sainz-Cruz, D. Kaplan, P. Emanuel, Y. Oreg, P. A. Pantaleon, J. A. Silva-Guillen, and F. Guinea, Band renormalization, quarter metals, and chiral su- perconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, arXiv:2502.19474 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Wang, Z.-Q

    Y.-Q. Wang, Z.-Q. Gao, and H. Yang, Chiral supercon- ductivity from a parent Chern band and its non-Abelian generalization, arXiv:2410.05384 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Shavit and J

    G. Shavit and J. Alicea, Quantum geometric Kohn– Luttinger superconductivity, Physical Review Letters 134, 176001 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    C. Xu, N. Zou, N. Peshcherenko, A. Jahin, T. Li, S.-Z. Lin, and Y. Zhang, Chiral superconductivity from spin polarized Chern band in twisted MoTe 2, arXiv:2504.07082 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Guerci, A

    D. Guerci, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, From fraction- alization to chiral topological superconductivity in flat chern band, arXiv:2506.10938 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Jahin and S

    A. Jahin and S. Lin, Enhanced kohn–luttinger topological superconductivity in bands with nontrivial geometry, arXiv:2411.09664 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    May-Mann, T

    J. May-Mann, T. Helbig, and T. Devakul, How pair- ing mechanism dictates topology in valley-polarized su- perconductors with berry curvature, arXiv:2503.05697 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dong and P

    Z. Dong and P. A. Lee, A controllable theory of superconductivity due to strong repulsion in a polarized band, arXiv:2503.11079 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and E. Khalaf, Family of ideal Chern flat bands with arbitrary Chern number in chiral twisted graphene multilayers, Physical Review Letters 128, 176404 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vortexability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Physical Review B 108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, arXiv:2501.00098 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. Dong, J. Wang, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Composite fermi liquid at zero magnetic field in twisted mote 2, Physical Review Letters 131, 136502 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. i. interaction-driven chern bands and fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 133, 206503 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Wang, O. Vafek, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Fractional chern insulators vs. non-magnetic states in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Physical Review B 109, 045147 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, Y

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Y. Wang, J. Liu, P. M. Tam, Z. Qi, Y. Jia, D. K. Efetov, O. Vafek, N. Regnault, H. Weng, Q. Wu, B. A. Bernevig, and J. Yu, Moir´ e fractional chern insulators ii: First-principles calculations and continuum models of rhombohedral graphene superlattices, Ph...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, Z. Hadjri, J. Yang, J. Seo, L. Shi, S. Ye, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and L. Ju, Extended quantum anomalous hall states in graphene/ {hBN} moir´ e superlattices, Nature637, 1090 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Doping a fractional quantum anomalous hall insulator, arXiv:2409.20567 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    M. P. Zaletel and R. S. K. Mong, Exact matrix product states for quantum hall wave functions, Physical Review B 86, 245305 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Topological characterization of fractional quantum hall ground states from microscopic hamiltonians, Physical Review Letters 110, 236801 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Physical Review Letters 51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  31. [39]

    In the metal, ξ1e scales algebraically with DMRG bond- dimension χ

  32. [40]

    Luther and V

    A. Luther and V. J. Emery, Backward scattering in the one-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review Letters 33, 589 (1974)

    1974

  33. [41]

    V. J. Emery, Theory of the quasi-one-dimensional electron gas with strong “on-site” interactions, Physical Review B 14, 2989 (1976)

    1976

  34. [42]

    R. B. Laughlin, Superconducting ground state of nonin- teracting particles obeying fractional statistics, Physical Review Letters 60, 2677 (1988)

    1988

  35. [43]

    R. B. Laughlin, The relationship between high- temperature superconductivity and the fractional quan- tum hall effect, Science 242, 525 (1988)

    1988

  36. [44]

    B. I. Halperin, Anyons in the quantized hall effect and in models of high temperature superconductors, Helvetica Physica Acta 65, 80 (1992)

    1992

  37. [45]

    M. P. A. Fisher and D. Lee, Correspondence between two-dimensional anyons and superconductivity, Physical Review B 43, 130 (1991). 9

    1991

  38. [46]

    Gannot and S

    Y. Gannot and S. A. Kivelson, How quantum phases on cylinders approach the two-dimensional limit, Physical Review B 107, 075127 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Jiang and T

    H. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hopping t′, Science 365, 1424 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Troyer, H

    M. Troyer, H. Tsunetsugu, T. M. Rice, J. Riera, and E. Dagotto, Spin gap and superconductivity in the one- dimensional t–j model with coulomb repulsion, Physical Review B 48, 4002 (1993)

    1993

  41. [49]

    Sahay, S

    R. Sahay, S. Divic, D. E. Parker, T. Soejima, S. Anand, J. Hauschild, M. Aidelsburger, A. Vishwanath, S. Chat- terjee, N. Y. Yao, and M. P. Zaletel, Superconductivity in a topological lattice model with strong repulsion, Physi- cal Review B 110, 195126 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    X. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S. Zhang, Chiral topological superconductor from a quantum anomalous hall state, Physical Review B 82, 184516 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    J. Wang, B. Lian, and S. Zhang, Chiral superconduct- ing phase and majorana fermions from the quantum anomalous hall plateau transition, Physical Review B92, 064520 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    hall crystal

    Z. Tevsanovi´ c, F. Axel, and B. I. Halperin, “hall crystal” versus wigner crystal, Physical Review B39, 8525 (1989)

    1989

  45. [53]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene i: Interaction-driven chern bands and fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 133, 206503 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Flux in- sertion, entanglement, and quantized responses, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014, P10007 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Barkeshli and J

    M. Barkeshli and J. McGreevy, Continuous transition between fractional quantum hall and superfluid states, Physical Review B 89, 235116 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    T. Wang, X. Song, M. P. Zaletel, and T. Senthil, Emer- gent qed 3 at the bosonic laughlin-state–to-superfluid transition, arXiv:2507.07611 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    J. Y. Lee, C. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Emergent multi-flavor qed 3 at the plateau transition between fractional Chern insulators: Applications to graphene heterostructures, Physical Review X 8, 031015 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Song, Y.-H

    X.-Y. Song, Y.-H. Zhang, and T. Senthil, Phase transitions out of quantum hall states in moir´ e materials, Physical Review B 109, 085143 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Gurarie and L

    V. Gurarie and L. Radzihovsky, Resonantly paired fermionic superfluids, Annals of Physics 322, 2 (2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    M. Kim, A. Timmel, L. Ju, and X.-G. Wen, Topological chiral superconductivity beyond pairing in a fermi liquid, arXiv:2409.18067 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Q. Xu, G. Ji, Y. Wang, H. Q. Trung, and B. Yang, Dynamics of clusters of anyons in fractional quantum hall fluids, arXiv:2505.20257 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Gattu and J

    M. Gattu and J. K. Jain, Molecular anyons in fractional quantum hall effect, arXiv:2505.22782 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Wang and M

    T. Wang and M. P. Zaletel, Anyon binding in fractional quantum hall states, to appear

  56. [64]

    Jiang, X

    Y. Jiang, X. Lai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Haule, J. Mao, and E. Y. Andrei, Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 573, 91 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Kerelsky, L

    A. Kerelsky, L. J. McGilly, D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, A. Rubio, and A. N. Pasupathy, Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 572, 95 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    Z. Li, L. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Meng, and F. Wang, Generalized wigner crystal states in graphene moir´ e superlattices, Nature597, 650 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Anyon delocalization transitions out of a disordered fqah insulator, arXiv:2506.02128 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Zhang, Holon metal, charge-density-wave and chiral superconductor from doping fractional Chern insulator and SU(3)1 chiral spin liquid, arXiv:2506.00110 (2025)

    Y.-H. Zhang, Holon metal, charge-density-wave and chiral superconductor from doping fractional Chern insulator and SU(3)1 chiral spin liquid, arXiv:2506.00110 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    Pichler, C

    F. Pichler, C. Kuhlenkamp, M. Knap, and A. Vish- wanath, Microscopic mechanism of anyon supercon- ductivity emerging from fractional chern insulators, arXiv:2506.08000 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.