Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Finite-cutoff holography and quasilocal thermodynamics of BTZ black holes in a cavity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A finite cavity turns BTZ black-hole thermodynamics into an exact TTbar-deformed system, with the cavity radius serving simultaneously as the physical size of the thermodynamic system and the RG scale of the dual theory.

desk verdict Careful, mostly self-contained derivation of finite-cutoff BTZ thermodynamics with a TTbar dictionary; the classical thermodynamics is solid, but the claimed exactness of the trace identity depends on an unproven counterterm choice. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08063 v4 pith:JQNM7LMI submitted 2025-07-10 gr-qc

Nazir A. Ganaie This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords BTZblackholecavitythermodynamicsquasilocalstresstensorBrown-YorkTTbardeformationfinite-cutoffholographyHawking-PagetransitionAdS3/CFT2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a finite-cutoff formulation of BTZ black-hole thermodynamics in which a circular cavity at radius $R$ is a genuine holographic screen. It shows that the renormalized Brown-York stress tensor on the wall is simultaneously the quasilocal stress tensor of the cavity and the stress tensor of a cutoff dual theory. The central result is an exact finite-radius Hamilton-Jacobi equation that, on the flat wall cylinder, reduces to the nonlinear equation of state $p-\epsilon = 8\pi G\ell(\epsilon p - j^2)$, the characteristic trace relation of a $T\bar{T}$-deformed two-dimensional theory. If correct, the cavity radius is at once the physical size of the quasilocal thermodynamic system and the renormalization-group scale of the finite-radius dual, unifying quasilocal thermodynamics, holographic RG flow, and solvable finite-cutoff AdS/CFT.

What carries the argument

The central object is the renormalized Brown-York tensor $T_{ij} = \frac{1}{8\pi G}(K h_{ij} - K_{ij} - \ell^{-1} h_{ij})$ on the cutoff surface $r=R$, together with the exact Hamilton-Jacobi identity (2.11) that follows from the Gauss relation and the gravitational constraint. On the flat wall cylinder $R[h]=0$, the identity collapses to the quadratic trace relation $p-\epsilon = 8\pi G\ell(\epsilon p - j^2)$, which the paper interprets as the trace flow equation of a $T\bar{T}$-deformed theory. This object carries the argument: it converts radial bulk evolution into an exact local equation of state on the wall, making the cavity radius into both a thermodynamic control parameter and an RG scale.

What would settle it

A direct check is to recompute the wall stress tensor for the same BTZ geometry using a different allowed counterterm, e.g. adding a finite term proportional to $\sqrt{-h}$, and verify that the trace relation (2.12) changes by a linear term in $\epsilon$ and $p$ while the Brown-York energy shifts by a constant; if the quadratic trace relation and the critical temperature $T_c=1/(2\pi R)$ remain exactly unchanged, the scheme-independence claim would be supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the renormalized Brown-York tensor (2.2) on a circular cavity wall enclosing a static or rotating BTZ black hole obeys the exact identity $T^i_{\ i} = \frac{\ell}{16\pi G} R[h] + 4\pi G\ell\, (T_{ij}T^{ij} - (T^i_{\ i})^2)$, which on the flat wall cylinder becomes $p-\epsilon = 8\pi G\ell(\epsilon p - j^2)$. This is the exact finite-radius Hamilton-Jacobi equation, derived directly from the gravitational Hamiltonian constraint, and it holds for both static and rotating BTZ solutions. The paper further claims that this wall stress tensor is simultaneously the quasilocal stress tensor of the cavity and the stress tensor of a $T\bar{T}$-deformed cutoff dual theory, with deformation parameter $\mu_{\mathrm{grav}} = 8\pi G\ell$ fixed entirely by bulk couplings. On this basis it derives exact quasilocal thermodynamics, including the first law $dE = T_R\,dS + \Omega_R\,dJ - P\,dL$, radial flow equations, a finite-size Hawking-Page transition at $T_c = 1/(2\pi R)$, a square-root energy spectrum, and a deformed Cardy density of states.

Load-bearing premise

The entire scheme relies on the specific local counterterm coefficient $-1/(8\pi G\ell)$ that sets the massless BTZ energy to zero; the trace relation, quasilocal energies, and critical temperature all shift if this normalization is changed, and the paper does not prove this is the unique choice compatible with its $T\bar{T}$ dictionary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The static BTZ branch is locally stable everywhere inside the cavity: the heat capacity at fixed wall circumference is positive for all $0<r_+<R$, and the off-shell free-energy landscape is strictly convex.
  • The finite-size Hawking-Page transition occurs at $T_c(R) = 1/(2\pi R)$, so the critical temperature is fixed entirely by the inverse proper circumference of the wall.
  • The wall stress tensor satisfies the exact $T\bar{T}$-type trace relation with deformation parameter $\mu_{\mathrm{grav}} = 8\pi G\ell$, giving a concrete bulk realization of a $T\bar{T}$-deformed large-$c$ thermal system.
  • The quasilocal energy spectrum takes the square-root form $E(L;E_0,\Pi_0) = \frac{L}{\mu_{\mathrm{grav}}}\left[1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{2\mu_{\mathrm{grav}}}{L}E_0 + \frac{\mu_{\mathrm{grav}}^2}{L^2}\Pi_0^2}\right]$, with the entropy retaining an exact Cardy form in undeformed variables.
  • Radial flow equations for the wall observables reproduce the Tolman redshift as a beta function, making the cavity radius an RG scale along which energy runs while angular momentum is conserved.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One can test the scheme-dependence of the central relation directly: a different local counterterm coefficient would add a linear term to the trace identity and shift quasilocal energies, so the claim that $\mu_{\mathrm{grav}} = 8\pi G\ell$ is the natural deformation parameter depends on the choice that sets the massless BTZ energy to zero.
  • The rotating grand-canonical analysis suggests that a global rotating phase diagram at fixed $(R, T_R, \Omega_R)$ would exhibit additional first-order transitions and possibly reentrant behavior, which the paper leaves implicit but its off-shell formalism is set up to compute.
  • The one-loop determinant analysis indicates that the finite-cutoff partition function may satisfy an exact modular property on the twisted torus, a structure that could be made explicit and connected to deformed torus amplitudes in solvable two-dimensional theories.
  • The framework extends naturally to charged or hairy black holes in a cavity, where additional chemical potentials would modify the quadratic flow equation and could produce novel phase structures; this is a direct corollary of the variational machinery developed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a finite-cutoff formulation of BTZ black-hole thermodynamics in which a circular cavity at radius R is treated as both a Brown-York quasilocal wall and a holographic RG screen. The authors derive the wall stress tensor, the quasilocal first law, radial flow equations, and an exact nonlinear trace relation that they identify with a T\bar{T} deformation of the dual CFT, with gravitational deformation parameter μ_grav = 8πGℓ. They also compute Euclidean on-shell actions for static and rotating BTZ and thermal AdS3, construct off-shell free-energy landscapes with positive Hessians, identify a finite-size Hawking-Page transition at T_c = 1/(2πR), and derive a deformed Cardy formula and one-loop corrections to the microcanonical density of states. The central novelty is the claim that the cavity radius simultaneously plays the role of thermodynamic size and RG scale, with the Brown-York tensor serving as the stress tensor of the finite-cutoff dual.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the paper provides a complete and explicit finite-radius holographic dictionary for the BTZ black hole, unifying quasilocal thermodynamics, holographic renormalization, and T\bar{T} deformations in an exactly solvable setting. The derivations are largely explicit and internally consistent: the first law dE = T_R dS + Ω_R dJ − P dL, the on-shell actions Eqs. (3.18)-(3.22), the Hessian determinant Eq. (6.28), and the spectral map Eq. (9.13) are all checked algebraically and reproduce the correct UV CFT limits. The paper also ships a detailed off-shell stability analysis and a clean geometric interpretation of the finite-size Hawking-Page transition. However, the central trace relation and the identification μ_grav = 8πGℓ are tied to a particular choice of boundary counterterm, and the manuscript does not establish that this choice is forced by the T\bar{T} dictionary or by any other physical principle. This scheme-dependence is a substantive correctness risk for the paper's strongest claims, even though the quasilocal thermodynamics of the cavity remains valid within the chosen scheme.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.11); Section 9, Eqs. (9.10)-(9.21)] The trace identity is presented as a consequence of the bulk Hamiltonian constraint, but it depends on the counterterm coefficient. Replacing the counterterm in Eq. (2.1) by −α/(8πGℓ) gives T^i_i = ℓ R[h]/(16πG α) + (1−α²)/(8πG α ℓ) + (4πGℓ/α)(T_ij T^ij − (T^i_i)^2), which on the flat wall reduces to p−ε = (1−α²)/(8πG α ℓ) + (8πGℓ/α)(εp−j²). Thus the absence of a vacuum term and the numerical value μ_grav = 8πGℓ are properties of the α = 1 subtraction, not of the bulk constraints alone. The paper should either prove that α = 1 is uniquely selected by the stated dictionary or explicitly present Eqs. (2.12), (9.11), and (9.21) as scheme-dependent statements.
  2. [Sections 2, 4, 5, and 7 (repeated assertion near Eqs. (2.1), (4.1), (5.1), (7.1))] The manuscript repeatedly states that the counterterm choice is 'not a matter of convenience alone,' but no argument is given for uniqueness. The requirement that massless BTZ has zero quasilocal energy is a normalization condition and does not by itself select α = 1, since the same condition can be imposed by shifting the reference subtraction. Because the later claims—the exact Hamilton-Jacobi equation, the T\bar{T} dictionary, the deformed spectrum Eq. (9.13), and the Hawking-Page temperature Eq. (7.14)—all inherit this scheme, the paper needs either a proof of uniqueness from stated physical axioms or a qualified reformulation of these results.
  3. [Section 7, Eqs. (7.10)-(7.14)] The finite-size Hawking-Page transition temperature T_c = 1/(2πR) is derived from the free-energy difference ΔF = F_BH − F_AdS, with both free energies evaluated in the α = 1 scheme. Under a change of counterterm coefficient α, each free energy acquires a term proportional to the wall area, and the crossing condition changes unless the wall areas of the two saddles coincide at the crossing, which is not generally the case. Therefore the claimed universality of T_c = 1/(2πR) and its interpretation as a modular crossover of the wall torus are also scheme-dependent and need to be revisited or qualified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 10, Eq. (10.4)] The one-loop determinant ∏_{n=2} |1−q_R^n|^{-2} is quoted rather than derived from the ghost and tensor operators in Eq. (10.3). If the quantum correction is presented as a result of this paper, a derivation or a precise citation to the Dirichlet boundary spectrum should be supplied.
  2. [Section 10, Eq. (10.12); Section 11, Eq. (11.9)] The arbitrary reference length ℓ_ref and the state-independent constant κ_stat are redundant in the expression log(R/ℓ_ref) + κ_stat; a redefinition of ℓ_ref is absorbed into κ_stat. The text should clarify what physical information, if any, is carried by this split.
  3. [Section 11, Eq. (11.1)] There is a typographical inconsistency: 'I_BH(R, betaR)' should read 'I_BH(R, β_R)', and 'Zbulk' in Eq. (11.6) should be 'Z_{bulk}^{1-loop}' or similar.
  4. [Sections 8-10] The counterterm and the Brown-York tensor definitions are repeated nearly verbatim in Sections 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10; consolidating these definitions would improve readability without changing the content.
  5. [Section 9 and References] The discussion of the T\bar{T} dictionary should engage explicitly with the scheme-dependence debate in the cited literature, in particular Refs. [49, 50], since the uniqueness of the cutoff definition is precisely the point at issue in the major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central derivations are explicit algebraic consequences of the stated renormalized action; the scheme-dependence of the counterterm is an assumption, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central identity (2.11)/(2.12) is obtained by substituting the renormalized Brown-York tensor (2.2) into the Gauss constraint (2.10); the same calculation is repeated in Secs. 5, 8, and 9. No quantity is fitted to data and no prediction is a renamed input. The quasilocal energy, pressure, first law, radial flow equations, off-shell potentials, Hawking-Page temperature T_c = 1/(2pi R), and the static critical horizon are all direct consequences of the BTZ geometry and the chosen action (2.1). The spectral map (9.13) is the algebraic inversion of the explicit Brown-York energy (9.12), and the deformed Cardy formula (9.17)/(11.13) is the standard Cardy formula re-expressed through that map; this is a substitution into an external result, not a circular derivation. The only load-bearing assumption is the choice of counterterm coefficient -1/(8pi G ell) (Eqs. 2.1, 4.1, 5.1, 7.1, 8.1, 9.1), which fixes the vacuum energy and therefore the coefficient mu_grav = 8pi G ell in the trace relation. A different coefficient would shift the trace identity, as the skeptic's attack notes; but choosing a scheme is not the same as fitting a parameter or defining the output into the input. The paper explicitly acknowledges the scheme choice and claims it is 'not a matter of convenience alone' without proof; that is an unproven assumption or correctness risk, not circularity. All external anchors (Brown-Henneaux central charge, Cardy counting, and the standard T Tbar dictionary) are independent results cited from the literature, and none is a self-citation of the present authors. Therefore no step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the standard semiclassical AdS3 gravity setup (Einstein equations with negative cosmological constant), the Dirichlet-wall variational principle with a specific local counterterm, the Euclidean saddle-point approximation, and the interpretive dictionary identifying the Brown-York tensor with a TTbar-deformed dual stress tensor. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. One arbitrary reference scale ℓ_ref appears in the one-loop logarithmic correction. The deformation parameter μ_grav=8πGℓ is not fitted; it is fixed by the bulk couplings G and ℓ.

free parameters (1)
  • ℓ_ref
    Introduced in Eq (10.12) to make the log(R/ℓ_ref) term dimensionless in the microcanonical entropy; it is an arbitrary reference scale that does not affect the state-dependent entropy but illustrates a scheme ambiguity in the one-loop correction.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Three-dimensional Einstein gravity with negative cosmological constant, Λ=-1/ℓ²
    The action (1.2) and all thermodynamic results are computed in this theory; no alternative theory is considered.
  • domain assumption Dirichlet wall at fixed radius with the local counterterm -1/(8πGℓ)√-h
    The Brown-York tensor (2.2) and all energies depend on this scheme choice, which sets massless BTZ energy to zero; a different counterterm would shift quasilocal energies though not the trace identity in the same form.
  • domain assumption Euclidean saddle-point approximation with regularity selecting smooth fillings
    The partition function (7.2) and phase transition rest on the semiclassical sum over smooth Euclidean saddles; one-loop corrections are added only in Section 10.
  • domain assumption Identification of the renormalized Brown-York tensor at finite cutoff with the stress tensor of a TTbar-deformed dual QFT
    Sections 8-9 assume the finite-cutoff AdS3/CFT2 dictionary in its TTbar form; this is a well-known conjecture supported by [43-50], not proven in this paper.
  • standard math Cardy formula for the asymptotic density of states
    Used in (9.16) and (11.12) to convert ultraviolet state labels into entropy; this is a standard result for large-c CFT2.
  • standard math Pure gravity has no local propagating degrees of freedom in 2+1 dimensions
    Used to argue that radial evolution is fixed by the Hamiltonian constraint; a standard property of Einstein gravity in three dimensions.
  • domain assumption Bekenstein-Hawking entropy S=πr+/(2G) continues to hold for the cavity system
    The entropy is taken as horizon area/4G throughout; this is standard semiclassical gravity and is not re-derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finite-cutoff holography and quasilocal thermodynamics of BTZ black holes in a cavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JQNM7LMI

@misc{pith2026250708063,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finite-cutoff holography and quasilocal thermodynamics of BTZ black holes in a cavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JQNM7LMI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08063}
}
read the original abstract

We show that the BTZ black hole in a finite radial cavity realizes a closed finite-cutoff thermodynamic system whose renormalized Brown-York stress tensor is simultaneously the quasilocal stress tensor of the cavity and the stress tensor of the cutoff dual theory. The central result is the exact finite-radius Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the wall stress tensor and its realization by the static and rotating BTZ families in local wall variables. In the homogeneous wall frame this equation becomes a nonlinear equation of state, with the corresponding gravitational deformation parameter fixed entirely by the bulk couplings. We use this structure to formulate the rotating cavity directly in terms of wall-measured grand-canonical data, derive the corresponding quasilocal first law and radial flow equations, and identify the finite-size Hawking-Page transition. The same wall dictionary gives an exact finite-cutoff spectral map and a deformed Cardy density of states in quasilocal energy variables. The cavity radius therefore plays a controlled double role: it is the physical size of the Brown-York thermodynamic system and the cutoff scale of the dual finite-radius theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics,”Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3292

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    Particle creation by black holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,”Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    Black holes and thermodynamics,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black holes and thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 191

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance,”Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2188. – 50 –

    work page 1976

  6. [6]

    Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    Black-hole thermodynamics and the euclidean einstein action,

    J. W. York, “Black-hole thermodynamics and the euclidean einstein action,”Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 2092

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    Black hole entropy is noether charge,

    R. M. Wald, “Black hole entropy is noether charge,”Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R3427

    work page 1993

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Some properties of noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846

    1994

  2. [10]

    Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,

    H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting, and J. W. York, “Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,”Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3376

    1990

  3. [11]

    Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,

    J. D. Brown and J. W. York, “Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,”Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1407

    1993

  4. [12]

    Temperature, energy and heat capacity of asymptotically anti-de sitter black holes,

    J. D. Brown, J. Creighton, and R. B. Mann, “Temperature, energy and heat capacity of asymptotically anti-de sitter black holes,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6394

    1994

  5. [13]

    Hamiltonian thermodynamics of the schwarzschild black hole,

    J. Louko and B. F. Whiting, “Hamiltonian thermodynamics of the schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 5583

    1995

  6. [14]

    Thermodynamics of reissner-nordstr¨ om-anti-de sitter black holes in the grand canonical ensemble,

    C. S. Pe¸ ca and J. P. S. Lemos, “Thermodynamics of reissner-nordstr¨ om-anti-de sitter black holes in the grand canonical ensemble,”Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 124007

    1999

  7. [15]

    Hairy black holes in a box,

    P. Basu, C. Krishnan, and P. N. Bala Subramanian, “Hairy black holes in a box,”JHEP11 (2016) 041

    2016

  8. [16]

    Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de sitter space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de sitter space,” Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

    1983

  9. [17]

    Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505

    1998

  10. [18]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    The world as a hologram,

    L. Susskind, “The world as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377

    1995

  12. [20]

    The large n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The large n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113

    1999

  13. [21]

    Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105

    1998

  14. [22]

    Anti de sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253

    1998

  15. [23]

    Large n field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large n field theories, string theory and gravity,”Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183

    2000

  16. [24]

    A chern-simons action for three-dimensional anti-de sitter supergravity theories,

    A. Ach´ ucarro and P. K. Townsend, “A chern-simons action for three-dimensional anti-de sitter supergravity theories,”Phys. Lett. B180(1986) 89

    1986

  17. [25]

    2+1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,

    E. Witten, “2+1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,”Nucl. Phys. B311(1988) 46

    1988

  18. [26]

    Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries,”Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207. – 51 –

    1986

  19. [27]

    The asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional einstein gravity,

    O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux, and P. van Driel, “The asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional einstein gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.12(1995) 2961

    1995

  20. [28]

    Three-dimensional gravity revisited,

    E. Witten, “Three-dimensional gravity revisited,”arXiv:0706.3359

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Black hole in three-dimensional spacetime,

    M. Ba˜ nados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, “Black hole in three-dimensional spacetime,”Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849

    1992

  22. [30]

    Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Ba˜ nados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, “Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,” Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 1506

    1993

  23. [31]

    The (2+1)-dimensional black hole,

    S. Carlip, “The (2+1)-dimensional black hole,”Class. Quant. Grav.12(1995) 2853

    1995

  24. [32]

    Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole,

    S. Carlip, “Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole,”Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 632

    1995

  25. [33]

    Black hole entropy from near-horizon microstates,

    A. Strominger, “Black hole entropy from near-horizon microstates,”JHEP02(1998) 009

    1998

  26. [34]

    A stress tensor for anti-de sitter gravity,

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for anti-de sitter gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 413

    1999

  27. [35]

    The holographic weyl anomaly,

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The holographic weyl anomaly,”JHEP07(1998) 023

    1998

  28. [36]

    Surface terms as counterterms in the ads/cft correspondence,

    R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson, and R. C. Myers, “Surface terms as counterterms in the ads/cft correspondence,”Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104001

    1999

  29. [37]

    On the holographic renormalization group,

    J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “On the holographic renormalization group,” JHEP08(2000) 003

    2000

  30. [38]

    The holographic renormalization group,

    J. de Boer, “The holographic renormalization group,”Fortschr. Phys.49(2001) 339

    2001

  31. [39]

    Asymptotically anti-de sitter spacetimes and their stress energy tensor,

    K. Skenderis, “Asymptotically anti-de sitter spacetimes and their stress energy tensor,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 740

    2001

  32. [40]

    Holographic reconstruction of spacetime and renormalization,

    S. de Haro, K. Skenderis, and S. N. Solodukhin, “Holographic reconstruction of spacetime and renormalization,”Commun. Math. Phys.217(2001) 595

    2001

  33. [41]

    Holographic renormalization,

    M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic renormalization,”Nucl. Phys. B 631(2002) 159

    2002

  34. [42]

    Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,

    K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849

    2002

  35. [43]

    Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,”arXiv:hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    t¯t-deformed 2d quantum field theories,

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, and R. Tateo, “t¯t-deformed 2d quantum field theories,” JHEP10(2016) 112

    2016

  37. [45]

    On space of integrable quantum field theories,

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “On space of integrable quantum field theories,”Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 363

    2017

  38. [46]

    Asymptotic fragility, near ads2 holography and t¯t,

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and M. Mirbabayi, “Asymptotic fragility, near ads2 holography and t¯t,”JHEP09(2017) 136

    2017

  39. [47]

    t ¯tand lst,

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki, and D. Kutasov, “t ¯tand lst,”JHEP07(2017) 122

    2017

  40. [48]

    Moving the cft into the bulk witht ¯t,

    L. McGough, M. Mezei, and H. Verlinde, “Moving the cft into the bulk witht ¯t,”JHEP04 (2018) 010. – 52 –

    2018

  41. [49]

    Cutoff ads3 versus thet ¯tdeformation,

    P. Kraus, J. Liu, and D. Marolf, “Cutoff ads3 versus thet ¯tdeformation,”JHEP07(2018) 027

    2018

  42. [50]

    t ¯tand the mirage of a bulk cutoff,

    M. Guica and R. Monten, “t ¯tand the mirage of a bulk cutoff,”SciPost Phys.10(2021) 024

    2021

  43. [51]

    One-loop partition functions of 3d gravity,

    S. Giombi, A. Maloney, and X. Yin, “One-loop partition functions of 3d gravity,”JHEP08 (2008) 007

    2008

  44. [52]

    Partition functions of three-dimensional pure gravity,

    X. Yin, “Partition functions of three-dimensional pure gravity,”Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.2 (2008) 285

    2008

  45. [53]

    Quantum gravity partition functions in three dimensions,

    A. Maloney and E. Witten, “Quantum gravity partition functions in three dimensions,”JHEP 02(2010) 029

    2010

  46. [54]

    Poincar´ e series, 3d gravity and cft spectroscopy,

    C. A. Keller and A. Maloney, “Poincar´ e series, 3d gravity and cft spectroscopy,”JHEP02 (2015) 080

    2015

  47. [55]

    A black hole farey tail,

    R. Dijkgraaf, J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and E. P. Verlinde, “A black hole farey tail,” arXiv:hep-th/0005003

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Thermodynamics and phase transition of btz black hole in a cavity,

    Y. Huang and J. Tao, “Thermodynamics and phase transition of btz black hole in a cavity,” Nucl. Phys. B982(2022) 115881. – 53 –

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.