Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 25 references

Kappa Plane Wave Modes and Continuous Squeezing in Quantum Field Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The $\kappa$-plane wave modes define a family of vacua $|0_\kappa\rangle$ that are continuous-mode squeezed states of the Minkowski vacuum, with $\tanh r(\nu)=e^{-\pi\nu/\kappa}$.

desk verdict The kappa-plane-wave construction is a genuine new family of algebraic vacua, but the central claim that |0_kappa> is a normalizable squeezed state in Minkowski Fock space fails Shale's criterion; it is a non-Fock state. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08066 v1 pith:5YZ4PPGU submitted 2025-07-10 hep-th

Arash Azizi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T2081R30 PACS 03.70.+k04.62.+v42.50.Dv
keywords kappaplanewavemodescontinuous-modesqueezedvacuumsqueezingparameterBogoliubovtransformationsstructureRindlerUnruheffectGaussianstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a one-parameter family of field modes in flat spacetime, the $\kappa$-plane waves, formed by combining positive- and negative-frequency Minkowski plane waves with $\kappa$-dependent weights. It claims that the associated vacuum $|0_\kappa\rangle$ is a continuous-mode squeezed vacuum: every frequency mode obeys $(a_\nu - e^{-\pi\nu/\kappa}a_\nu^\dagger)|0_\kappa\rangle=0$, with squeezing parameter $r(\nu)=\frac{1}{2}\ln\coth(\pi\nu/2\kappa)$. The same construction yields two Bogoliubov transformations that interpolate between the known Minkowski, Rindler, and Unruh mode decompositions. If correct, this connects vacuum selection in quantum field theory to the Gaussian states and squeezing techniques of quantum optics, and provides a tunable family of pure vacua that reduce to the Minkowski vacuum as $\kappa\to0$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $\kappa$-plane wave mode $\Phi(u,\Lambda,\kappa)=\big(8\pi\Lambda\sinh(\pi\Lambda/\kappa)\big)^{-1/2}\big(e^{\pi\Lambda/2\kappa}e^{-i\Lambda u}+e^{-\pi\Lambda/2\kappa}e^{i\Lambda u}\big)$, whose coefficients are chosen so that $\kappa$ is a single frequency-independent constant. The identity that carries the argument is the per-frequency annihilation condition $(a_\nu-e^{-\pi\nu/\kappa}a_\nu^\dagger)|0_\kappa\rangle=0$; since $|e^{-\pi\nu/\kappa}|<1$, this condition selects a unique squeezed vacuum for each frequency. Assembling all frequencies gives the continuous-mode squeezing operator $\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^\infty d\nu\,r(\nu)(a_\nu^{\dagger 2}-a_\nu^2)\right)$, with $r(\nu)=\frac{1}{2}\ln\coth(\pi\nu/2\kappa)$. The two Bogoliubov transformations (3.15) and (3.20) then connect this vacuum to the $\kappa$-Rindler, Minkowski, Rindler, and Unruh bases.

What would settle it

Expand the field using only the $\kappa$-plane wave modes and compute the equal-time commutator $[\Phi(t,x),\partial_t\Phi(t,x)]$; if the result is not $i\delta(x-x')$, the single-moving-sector mode set is incomplete and $|0_\kappa\rangle$ is not the vacuum of the full (1+1)-dimensional field. A second check is to compute the per-mode occupation $\langle N_\nu\rangle=\sinh^2 r(\nu)=1/(e^{2\pi\nu/\kappa}-1)$: any deviation from this Planck form would show that the squeezed description of $|0_\kappa\rangle$ is not the one the modes actually realize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $\kappa$-plane wave vacuum $|0_\kappa\rangle$ is a pure, continuous-mode squeezed vacuum built on the Minkowski vacuum, not a thermal mixed state. For every positive frequency $\nu$, the annihilation condition $(a_\nu - e^{-\pi\nu/\kappa}a_\nu^\dagger)|0_\kappa\rangle=0$ holds, and for these modes this condition uniquely characterizes the state. In unitary form, $|0_\kappa\rangle=\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^\infty d\nu\, r(\nu)(a_\nu^\dagger a_\nu^\dagger - a_\nu a_\nu)\right)|0_M\rangle$ with $r(\nu)=\frac{1}{2}\ln\coth(\pi\nu/2\kappa)$, so the vacuum is a multimode squeezed state with a frequency-dependent squeezing spectrum. As $\kappa\to0$ the modes reduce to ordinary Minkowski plane waves and $|0_\kappa\rangle\to|0_M\rangle$; as $\kappa$ grows, low-frequency modes become strongly squeezed. The companion Bogoliubov transformations between $\kappa$-plane wave and $\kappa$-Rindler operators reduce in the appropriate limits to the Minkowski-Rindler, Unruh, and Rindler decompositions, giving the paper's 'mother of all Bogoliubov transformations.'

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the specific exponential coefficient profile in the mode ansatz, with a single global constant $\kappa$ and real positive weights, defines the physical modes; that profile is what produces the exponential squeezing spectrum $\tanh r(\nu)=e^{-\pi\nu/\kappa}$, while other allowed coefficient choices would give different spectra, and only the right-moving sector is quantized in the presented expansion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • As $\kappa\to0$, the $\kappa$-plane wave operators reduce to Minkowski plane wave operators and the vacuum reduces to the Minkowski vacuum, so the family continuously deforms standard flat-space quantization.
  • Each frequency sector of $|0_\kappa\rangle$ contains only even-number Fock states, with per-mode occupation $\langle N_\nu\rangle=1/(e^{2\pi\nu/\kappa}-1)$, the Planck form at temperature $\kappa/2\pi$.
  • Distinct $\kappa$-vacua are inequivalent quantizations connected by a continuous squeezing operation with parameter $\eta_{\kappa,\kappa',\Lambda}=\sinh(\pi\Lambda(1/\kappa-1/\kappa')/2)/\sinh(\pi\Lambda(1/\kappa+1/\kappa')/2)$, and operators with different $\kappa$ satisfy deformed commutation relations.
  • The Bogoliubov transformations (3.15) and (3.20) reduce to the Minkowski-Rindler, Unruh, and Rindler decompositions in the appropriate limits, unifying the standard flat-space mode maps.
  • The Minkowski vacuum can also be written as a squeezed state over $|0_\kappa\rangle$, so the thermal appearance of the vacuum in accelerated frames is recast as analytic squeezing within this family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: because $|0_\kappa\rangle$ is a pure Gaussian state with a known covariance matrix, continuous-variable quantities such as entanglement entropy and logarithmic negativity can be evaluated the same way; the paper does not carry out these computations.
  • Inference: the exponential squeezing spectrum is an input of the ansatz rather than a derived consequence, so different allowed coefficient profiles would yield different squeezed-vacuum families; the paper's universality claim concerns the Bogoliubov map, not the spectrum.
  • Inference: the presented expansion quantizes only the right-moving ($u=t-x$) sector, so a full (1+1)-dimensional application needs the left-moving $v$-sector or a chiral restriction; adding that sector may alter the Bogoliubov transformations.
  • Inference: the Planckian occupation at temperature $\kappa/2\pi$ suggests that $\kappa$ could serve as an effective temperature knob for analog or circuit experiments, an application the paper does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a one-parameter family of mode functions, termed κ-plane wave modes, constructed as κ-dependent linear combinations of positive- and negative-frequency Minkowski plane waves in 1+1-dimensional Minkowski spacetime. The associated annihilation operators A_{Λ,κ} define vacua |0κ⟩ that the paper claims satisfy (a_ν − e^{−πν/κ} a†_ν)|0κ⟩ = 0, hence are continuous-mode squeezed vacua with squeezing parameter r(ν) = (1/2) ln coth(πν/2κ), reducing to the Minkowski vacuum as κ→0. The paper also derives two Bogoliubov transformations between κ-plane wave and κ-Rindler operators, Eqs. (3.15) and (3.20), and claims they interpolate between Minkowski, Rindler, and Unruh quantizations. The algebraic manipulations appear internally consistent, but the central Hilbert-space interpretation is not: the squeezing spectrum is an input chosen in the ansatz, and the state fails the Shale criterion, rendering it a non-Fock algebraic state rather than a normalizable vector in the Minkowski Fock space.

Significance. If the squeezing characterization were genuinely derived and the state were normalizable, this would provide an interesting family of Gaussian vacua interpolating between Minkowski and non-Minkowski quantizations, with potential applications in relativistic quantum information and analog gravity. The paper does contain several correct and verifiable algebraic results: the normalization (2.5) with the ansatz (2.10), the Bogoliubov maps (3.4)–(3.5), and the limiting cases in Table 2 are consistent as formal mode expansions. However, the significance is substantially undercut by two facts: the squeezing spectrum is engineered through the ansatz rather than derived, and the purported normalizable pure Gaussian state is not in the Minkowski Fock space because the squeezing kernel fails Hilbert–Schmidt condition. These issues must be addressed before the claims in the abstract and Section 5.3 can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.13)] The claim that |0κ⟩ is a normalizable continuous-mode squeezed vacuum in the Minkowski Fock space is inconsistent with Shale's criterion. With r(ν) = (1/2) ln coth(πν/2κ), one has sinh r(ν) = e^{−πν/κ}/√(1−e^{−2πν/κ}) ∼ √(κ/(2πν)) as ν→0, so ∫₀^∞ sinh² r(ν)dν diverges logarithmically at the infrared. Consequently the squeezing operator in (5.13) is not unitarily implementable, the normalization constant Zκ in (5.9) is not finite, and |0κ⟩ is a non-Fock algebraic state rather than a pure Gaussian state in the Minkowski Hilbert space. The authors must either supply an infrared regulator and state its removal, or explicitly reframe |0κ⟩ as a non-Fock algebraic state and adjust the abstract and Section 5.3 accordingly.
  2. [Sections 2.1 and Appendix B] The headline relation (5.8) is not a derived consequence of the general mode construction; it is built into the ansatz (2.10). Appendix B states that the coefficients were selected precisely so that γ(ν) = e^{−πν/κ} and hence the squeezed condition would hold, and any real coefficients satisfying the normalization (2.5) would define some squeezed vacuum with a different profile. The 'unique characterization' claimed in the abstract and in Section 5.3 should therefore be qualified: the resulting spectrum is a property of the chosen ansatz, not a prediction of the framework.
  3. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.12)] The field expansion in Eq. (2.12) contains only the right-moving sector u = t−x. For a massless scalar field in 1+1 dimensions, the full field also contains a left-moving sector v = t+x, and the Minkowski vacuum appearing in (5.9) would be a product over both sectors. The paper must either state that it is treating a chiral field (and define the left-moving sector accordingly) or include the v-sector modes in the construction; otherwise the vacuum |0κ⟩ is not a vacuum of the full field theory as presented.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.6)] The symbol k (not κ) appears in the sinh argument, and the letter a is used for the acceleration, which conflicts with the annihilation operator a used in (3.5) and elsewhere. Please align the notation.
  2. [Paragraph after Eq. (3.20)] The list of limiting cases is garbled: the text says 'Minkowski plane wave as κ → 0 in (3.20)' and then 'Minkowski plane wave as κ′ → 0 in (3.20)' without clear distinction; please specify which equation and which limit recovers which mode.
  3. [Eq. (5.6)] The sign convention relating the first line (with η A†A†) to the second line (with tanh⁻¹η (AA − A†A†)) is not explained; a brief comment referencing the single-mode identity (D.2) with the chosen phase would remove ambiguity.
  4. [Eq. (5.9)] The normalization constant Zκ is never computed. Given the divergence discussed in major comment 1, the paper should either compute it in a regulated setting or state explicitly that it is infinite in the continuum limit.
  5. [Section 4] The commutation relations (4.2) and (4.5) treat operators for different κ as if they act on a common Hilbert space. Since the vacua are not unitarily equivalent, these relations should be described as formal algebraic relations, and the associated limitations should be stated.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Headline squeezing spectrum is imposed by the ansatz: Eq. (2.10) is chosen, by the paper's own Appendix B, to make tanh r(ν)=e^{-πν/κ}; Eq. (5.13) restates that coefficient choice.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.10); used in Sec. 5.2-5.3, Eqs. (5.8)-(5.13)]
    "Following [21], we choose the following ansatz: α(Λ) = e^{πΛ/2κ}/√(8πΛ sinh(πΛ/κ)), β(Λ) = e^{−πΛ/2κ}/√(8πΛ sinh(πΛ/κ)). ... Second, and most importantly, this is the unique choice that allows the resulting κ-vacuum to be interpreted as a continuous-mode squeezed state of the Minkowski vacuum."

    For a Bogoliubov vacuum, the squeezed parameter is tanh r(ν)=β(ν)/α(ν). The ansatz (2.10) has β/α=e^{-πν/κ}. The paper's own Bogoliubov map (3.5), obtained by taking κ→0 of (3.4), gives A_{Λ,κ} ∝ e^{πΛ/2κ}a_Λ − e^{-πΛ/2κ}a†_Λ, so the vacuum condition A_{Λ,κ}|0κ>=0 immediately becomes (a_ν − e^{-πν/κ}a†_ν)|0κ>=0. Thus Eq. (5.12) and r(ν)=1/2 ln coth(πν/2κ) are the coefficient ratio β/α rewritten. The central 'prediction' is therefore not derived from independent input; it is the input, as Appendix B openly states.

  2. self definitional [Appendix B, Eqs. (B.2)-(B.5)]
    "A general solution can be constructed by parameterizing the coefficients using an arbitrary function λ(Ω): ... Comparing (B.2) and (B.3), we have tanh λ(Ω) = e^{−πΩ/κ}. ... For a generic λ(Ω), the resulting κ depends on Ω, which contradicts the requirement that κ is a constant deformation parameter."

    The 'uniqueness' argument selects the exponential coefficients by imposing tanh λ(Ω)=e^{-πΩ/κ} with constant κ. But any real coefficients α=(4πΩ)^{-1/2}cosh λ and β=(4πΩ)^{-1/2}sinh λ already define a squeezed vacuum with tanh r=tanh λ. The special exponential profile e^{-πΩ/κ} appears only because the appendix inserts the advertised squeezing spectrum as the requirement. So the uniqueness proof is a restatement of the ansatz rather than evidence that the spectrum is a consequence of more basic principles.

full rationale

The core circularity is in the central claim: the continuous-mode squeezing spectrum, tanh r(ν)=e^{-πν/κ}, is not a consequence of a first-principles construction but is baked into the coefficient ansatz (2.10). Appendix B confirms this by deriving the ansatz from the condition tanh λ(Ω)=e^{-πΩ/κ} and by saying the exponential form 'enables' the squeezed state condition. The paper's later equations (5.8)-(5.13) simply read the coefficient ratio off the Bogoliubov map, so the headline result is self-definitional. The remaining algebra—the commutators, the κ-plane-wave/κ-Rindler Bogoliubov transformations, and the limiting cases—is genuinely derived and not circular. The self-citations [20]-[22] are not separately load-bearing: the squeezed-state uniqueness invoked from [22] is standard and is re-derived in Appendix D, and the ansatz is justified in Appendix B rather than by citation alone. A separate non-circularity concern, not scored here, is that the state |0κ> may fail Shale's normalizability criterion because ∫ sinh^2 r(ν)dν diverges in the infrared; that is a mathematical correctness issue, not a circular-reasoning one.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result of the paper is, by the paper's own equations, determined by the chosen mode coefficients. The parameter κ and the exponential profile are free inputs; the squeezed characterization is their consequence. The remaining inputs, canonical commutation relations, Gamma integrals, and the chiral truncation, are standard or unstated.

free parameters (2)
  • κ = free (not fitted; chosen by hand)
    A single global deformation parameter introduced by hand; controls the mode-mixing weights in Eq. (2.10) and hence the entire squeezing spectrum tanh r(ν) = e^(−πν/κ). No mechanism fixes its value.
  • relative phase of α and β = 0
    Appendix B states 'we ignore the phase and consider α(Ω) and β(Ω) as real and positive'; the relative phase is physically significant but unexplored.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard Fock quantization and canonical commutation relations for the massless scalar field
    Section 2 sets [a_Ω, a†_Ω′] = δ(Ω−Ω′); the construction lives inside the standard QFT framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz (2.10) with coefficients e^(±πΛ/2κ) and a global constant κ
    Chosen by hand; Appendix B shows the choice is what produces tanh r(ν) = e^(−πν/κ). The paper frames this as 'required', but any real coefficients satisfying the normalization (2.5) define a valid squeezed vacuum.
  • domain assumption Chiral truncation: only u = t − x modes are quantized; the v-sector is ignored
    The field expansion (2.12) contains only u-dependent modes and no v-dependent left-movers; the paper never states how the left-moving sector is treated.
  • standard math Gamma-function integral identities and +iε contour prescriptions for Fourier transforms
    Appendix C derives the integrals used in the κ-plane/κ-Rindler transformations; the regulator choices are standard.
invented entities (1)
  • κ-plane wave modes and the vacuum family |0κ⟩
    purpose: Define a one-parameter family of valid quantizations of the flat-spacetime scalar field that interpolate to Minkowski as κ→0 and are squeezed relative to it.
    No experimental signature, production mechanism, or falsifiable prediction is attached to any value of κ; the family is a mathematical construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kappa Plane Wave Modes and Continuous Squeezing in Quantum Field Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5YZ4PPGU

@misc{pith2026250708066,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kappa Plane Wave Modes and Continuous Squeezing in Quantum Field Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5YZ4PPGU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08066}
}
abstract

We introduce a new family of field modes in flat spacetime -- termed $\kappa$-plane wave modes -- constructed from $\kappa$-dependent linear combinations of Minkowski plane waves. These modes define a one-parameter family of vacua, $|0_\kappa\rangle$, that smoothly interpolate between different quantizations, reducing to the Minkowski vacuum in the limit $\kappa \to 0$. We show that $|0_\kappa\rangle$ is uniquely characterized as a continuous-mode squeezed vacuum, with frequency-dependent squeezing parameter $r(\nu)$ satisfying $\tanh r(\nu) = e^{-\pi \nu/\kappa}$. We also derive two Bogoliubov transformations between $\kappa$-plane wave and $\kappa$-Rindler operators, which exhibit a universal form and smoothly interpolate between all known mode decompositions, including those of Minkowski, Rindler, and Unruh quantizations as limiting cases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. S. DeWitt,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time, Phys. Rept. 19 (1975) 295–357

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    R. M. Wald,On Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.45 (1975) 9–34

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    S. A. Fulling,Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time, vol. 17. Cambridge University Press, 1989

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982

    1982

  5. [5]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics. Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1994

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki,Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    E. Witten,Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit?, inDialogues Between Physics and Mathematics, pp. 241–284. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43 (1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    W. G. Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 870–892

    1976

  2. [10]

    A. G. S. Landulfo and G. E. A. Matsas,Sudden death of entanglement and teleportation fidelity loss via the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. A80 (Sep, 2009) 032315

    2009

  3. [11]

    R. B. Mann and T. C. Ralph,Relativistic quantum information, Classical and Quantum Gravity 29 (2012), no. 22 220301. – 23 –

    2012

  4. [12]

    E. W. Aspling,Unruh-DeWitt Quantum Computing: Realizing Quantum Shannon Theory With Quantum Fields. PhD thesis, SUNY, Binghamton, 2024.arXiv:2407.13628

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    M. O. Scully, V. V. Kocharovsky, A. Belyanin, E. Fry, and F. Capasso,Enhancing Acceleration Radiation from Ground-State Atoms via Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.91 (2003) 243004, [quant-ph/0305178]

    2003 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Belyanin, V

    A. Belyanin, V. V. Kocharovsky, F. Capasso, E. Fry, M. S. Zubairy, and M. O. Scully,Quantum electrodynamics of accelerated atoms in free space and in cavities, Phys. Rev. A74 (Aug, 2006) 023807

    2006

  7. [15]

    M. O. Scully,Quantum Photocell: Using Quantum Coherence to Reduce Radiative Recombination and Increase Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett.104 (May, 2010) 207701

    2010

  8. [16]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser,Analogue Gravity, Living Reviews in Relativity14 (2011), no. 1 3

    2011

  9. [17]

    P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori,Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits, Rev. Mod. Phys.84 (Jan, 2012) 1–24

    2012

  10. [18]

    S. A. Fulling,Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2850–2862

    1973

  11. [19]

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald,What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle, Phys. Rev. D29 (Mar, 1984) 1047–1056

    1984

  12. [20]

    Azizi,Kappa vacua: Infinite number of new vacua in two-dimensional quantum field theory, 2023

    A. Azizi,Kappa vacua: Infinite number of new vacua in two-dimensional quantum field theory, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Azizi,Kappa vacua: enhancing the Unruh temperature, JHEP 07 (2023) 064, [arXiv:2301.13672]

    A. Azizi,Kappa vacua: enhancing the Unruh temperature, JHEP 07 (2023) 064, [arXiv:2301.13672]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Azizi,Uniqueness of Squeezed States for One and Two Modes, and a No-Go Beyond, 2025

    A. Azizi,Uniqueness of Squeezed States for One and Two Modes, and a No-Go Beyond, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock,Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (Jun, 2005) 513–577

    2005

  16. [24]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd,Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.84 (May, 2012) 621–669

    2012

  17. [25]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, 1997. – 24 –

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.