Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Detecting Intermediate-mass Black Holes Using Miniature Pulsar Timing Arrays in Globular Clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a miniature pulsar timing array formed by several millisecond pulsars inside a globular cluster can detect intermediate-mass black hole binaries in the same cluster via correlated, microsecond-level timing residuals.

desk verdict The single-pulsar microsecond residual estimate is credible and worth engaging; the mini-PTA sqrt(Np) sensitivity gain in Section IV is asserted, not derived, and needs real work before the paper's headline claim can stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08201 v2 pith:JRWN7K2X submitted 2025-07-10 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Xian Chen , Verónica Vázquez-Aceves , Siyuan Chen , Kejia Lee , Yanjun Guo , Kuo Liu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords intermediate-massblackholesglobularclustersmillisecondpulsarspulsartimingarraysgravitationalwavesnear-fieldresidualsOmegaCentauriM15
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the pulsars already found inside globular clusters can act as a compact gravitational-wave detector for the intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) that theory places in cluster cores. It derives a semi-analytical formula for the 'near-field' timing residual that an IMBH binary imprints on a nearby millisecond pulsar, and finds the effect can reach a few microseconds for favorable configurations in $\Omega$ Centauri and M15. At current timing precision of about 10 microseconds, a single pulsar with roughly 100 measurements could already test a slice of the binary parameter space; combining about 10 pulsars would improve sensitivity by a factor of $\sqrt{N_p}$ and could push toward 100 nanoseconds. The paper thus claims that mini-PTAs can become a practical IMBH search tool.

What carries the argument

The central object is the near-field timing-residual expression $R(t) \sim (4G\mu a^2 \omega_b^2/c^5) \sqrt{(\Delta Ci)^2 + (\Delta Si)^2}$, where $\Delta Ci$ and $\Delta Si$ are the differences of cosine and sine integrals evaluated at the pulsar and the observer. This expression isolates the photon-path integral of the gravitational-wave strain as the dominant contribution, and shows that in globular-cluster geometry the integral difference is of order unity, so the residual depends primarily on the projected impact parameter $b$ between the pulsar and the binary. The detectability side is carried by a matched-filter threshold $A \gtrsim 4.65\,\sigma / \sqrt{N}$, which converts an observed residual amplitude into the required timing precision and number of measurements.

What would settle it

Take a known millisecond pulsar in $\Omega$ Centauri with current roughly 10 microsecond precision, collect about 100 measurements, and search for the predicted few-microsecond sinusoid at the orbital period of a candidate IMBH binary; if no signal appears above approximately $4.65\sigma/\sqrt{N}$ in a system later confirmed to host a binary with $q>0.1$ and a period of days, the residual formula or the detectability estimate is ruled out. A cheaper check is to measure the cross-correlation of residuals from two cluster pulsars: the predicted common signal should produce a correlation of the expected sign and amplitude, while independent red noise would not.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a circular IMBH binary of total mass around $10^3$ to $10^4$ solar masses and a pulsar within about a parsec, the dominant contribution to the timing residual is not the standard pulsar term but the integral of the gravitational-wave perturbation along the photon path between pulsar and observer. Retaining only the first term in the strain expansion, this photon-integral term is larger by a factor of roughly $10^4$ and yields residuals of order 2 microseconds times a factor built from sine and cosine integrals that is of order unity for real cluster geometry. That factor depends on the projected impact parameter $b$ between the pulsar and the binary, not on the pulsar's distance along the line of sight, so the residual is predictable from projected sky positions. The paper evaluates these residuals in $\Omega$ Centauri and M15, identifies binaries with mass ratio $q \gtrsim 0.1$ and orbital periods of a few days as detectable, and derives a matched-filter threshold $A \gtrsim 4.65\,\sigma / \sqrt{N}$ that sets the required timing precision and cadence.

Load-bearing premise

The detectability analysis assumes the timing residuals can be modeled as a pure sine wave on top of white, uncorrelated noise of known rms, and that residuals from different pulsars add independently, whereas real globular-cluster pulsars often show red noise and timing-model absorption that could hide the signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single well-timed millisecond pulsar in Omega Centauri or M15 can already probe IMBH binaries with mass ratio $q \gtrsim 0.1$ and orbital periods of a few days, a region not covered by current stellar-kinematic and imaging searches.
  • Combining roughly 10 cluster pulsars of similar timing precision improves the sensitivity by $\sqrt{N_p}$, so near-future 100 nanosecond timing would open a substantially larger region of the mass-ratio and semi-major-axis plane.
  • Because the residual depends only on the projected impact parameter $b$, not on the pulsar's line-of-sight position, the search can proceed with existing two-dimensional pulsar positions.
  • The same framework extends to eccentric binaries through harmonic decomposition, so the mini-PTA search need not be restricted to circular orbits.
  • The analysis sets a quantitative target for timing campaigns: to reach a residual amplitude $A$, one needs timing precision $\sigma \lesssim A \sqrt{N} / 4.65$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the near-field residual formula should also apply to stellar-mass black hole binaries or neutron star binaries orbiting close to a millisecond pulsar in a cluster, so mini-PTAs might detect more than just IMBHs, though the paper focuses on IMBHs.
  • Editorial inference: the claimed $\sqrt{N_p}$ gain assumes residuals from different pulsars are independent; if cluster-scale noise or timing-model errors are correlated across pulsars, the gain would weaken, and directly measuring inter-pulsar residual correlations would be a necessary check.
  • Editorial inference: the dependence on impact parameter suggests that a detection in several pulsars could localize the binary's projected position within the cluster core, complementing kinematic evidence for an IMBH.
  • Editorial inference: one could test the framework by injecting a synthetic sinusoidal residual into real globular-cluster pulsar data and checking that the matched-filter recovery matches Equation (35).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a semi-analytical model for the timing residuals of millisecond pulsars (MSPs) in globular clusters induced by a nearby intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) binary. Starting from linearized general relativity and the quadrupole formula, it derives an expression for the near-field timing residual, Eq. (30), whose amplitude scales as 2 microseconds times (m1 q / 1e4 solar masses)(a / 1e5 r_g)^-1, with order-unity sine/cosine-integral factors. The residual is dominated by the photon-GW interaction term, and the authors argue that its amplitude is insensitive to the pulsar's line-of-sight coordinate for typical cluster parameters. They apply the formula to Omega Centauri and M15, finding that residuals above 1 microsecond are possible for mass ratios q ≳ 0.1 and orbital periods of a few days in favorable configurations. They then discuss detectability, derive a matched-filter threshold A ≳ 4.65 sigma / sqrt(N) in Section IV, and assert that combining N_p MSPs in a cluster improves sensitivity by a factor of sqrt(N_p), leading to a claimed 100-nanosecond sensitivity for future timing programs. The central quantitative prediction is the microsecond-level single-pulsar residual; the multi-pulsar array gain is asserted rather than derived.

Significance. If the single-pulsar residual estimate is correct, it gives a concrete, falsifiable prediction: a well-timed MSP near an IMBH binary in a globular cluster should exhibit a sinusoidal timing residual with an amplitude of order a microsecond and a period set by the binary orbit. The explicit scaling in Eq. (30) is a useful tool for designing pulsar timing searches and for interpreting nondetections. The paper also correctly emphasizes that the conventional far-field PTA correlation analysis does not apply when the GW source is within the cluster, making the near-field treatment necessary. However, the claimed sqrt(N_p) gain for a miniature PTA is not established, and the detection thresholds rest on idealized white-noise assumptions that are unlikely to hold for real globular-cluster pulsars. The title-level claim that mini-PTAs can reach 100-nanosecond sensitivity is therefore currently unsupported, even though the single-MSP estimate is a worthwhile contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, final paragraph, and Eq. (35)] The extension of the single-pulsar detection threshold to N_p pulsars is not derived. Equations (22)-(30) show that the residual for each MSP has an amplitude proportional to sqrt((Delta C_i)^2 + (Delta S_i)^2) and a phase phi_i that depend on that pulsar's unmeasured line-of-sight coordinate z_e and impact parameter b, as well as on the binary orientation. A coherent sqrt(N_p) improvement requires that all residuals share a common amplitude and phase template, or that the search explicitly marginalizes over the per-pulsar geometry and phases; the paper does neither. If the residuals are combined incoherently, which is the natural blind strategy when the phases are unknown, the minimum detectable amplitude improves only as N_p^{-1/4}, not N_p^{-1/2}. The claimed '100-nanosecond sensitivity' and the mini-PTA reach in Section IV are therefore overestimated until a proper multi-pulsar detection statistic is provided.
  2. [Section IV, Eqs. (31)-(35), and Figures 2-3] The detectability analysis assumes white Gaussian noise, a pure sinusoidal signal of known frequency and phase, and a long observation duration so that oscillatory cross-terms average away. These assumptions are not satisfied for the parameter space shown in Figures 2 and 3. Low-frequency sinusoidal signals can be partially absorbed by the pulsar timing model fit (spin, spin-down, and astrometric parameters), which is especially severe near the P = 1 yr contour; real globular-cluster timing residuals contain red noise, not white noise, as the paper itself notes for accelerations in Section II.A; and for P ~ 1 yr a 10-year dataset contains only about 10 cycles, so the ensemble averages leading to Eqs. (33)-(34) are poor approximations. The thresholds in Eq. (35) and the accessible parameter regions in Figures 2 and 3 are therefore optimistic and need to be recomputed with a realistic noise model and the timing-model response included.
  3. [Section III, Omega Centauri example] The sentence 'If the same pulsars are observed repeatedly, accumulating N ~ 10^2 timing residual measurements, it becomes feasible to detect a residual as small as ~1 microsecond (see Section IV)' is inconsistent with Eq. (35), which gives A ≳ 4.65 sigma / sqrt(N) ≈ 4.7 microseconds for sigma = 10 microseconds and N = 100. Either the threshold formula is wrong or the quoted sensitivity is incorrect; this inconsistency affects the interpretation of the q-a contours in Figures 2 and 3 and should be corrected.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II.A] In the paragraph after Eq. (1), 'the second time derivate of the pulsar period' should read 'the second time derivative of the pulsar period.'
  2. [Section III, M15 paragraph] The text says that more than half of the M15 pulsars have a spin period shorter than 30 microseconds; this should almost certainly be 30 milliseconds, since MSPs have millisecond spin periods.
  3. [Section II.C, Eqs. (18)-(22)] The order-unity coefficients A_1, A_2, A_3 and the phases phi_1, phi_2, phi_3 are not given explicitly. Since Eq. (30) is the key quantitative prediction, the authors should provide the orientation-dependent coefficients or explicitly state that they are absorbed into O(1) constants with a defined range.
  4. [Equations (9)-(12)] The transition from the trace-reversed stress-energy tensor to the quadrupole-moment expressions in Eqs. (10)-(12) would benefit from more detail, in particular the definition of Q_ij and the reason why the P_z term vanishes for a circular binary.
  5. [Figures 2 and 3] The color bars and contour annotations in Figures 2 and 3 are difficult to read in the printed version; please ensure that the contour labels are legible and do not overlap.
  6. [Abstract and Section III] The abstract's statement that favorable configurations in Omega Centauri and M15 lead to detection of binaries with mass ratios q ≳ 0.1 and orbital periods of a few days is more strongly supported for Omega Centauri; in M15 the peak residual occurs at periods below an hour, and the text should explicitly distinguish the two cases to avoid overgeneralization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the residual and threshold are derived from independent GR and noise calculations.

full rationale

The paper contains no load-bearing circular step. The timing-residual amplitude in Eq. (30) follows from integrating the linearized GR photon-propagation equations, Eqs. (2)-(14), with a quadrupole GW source model, Eqs. (10)-(12), and a circular-binary assumption. The numerical coefficient of about 2 microseconds is obtained by substituting fiducial physical parameters (m1, q, a, b, ze) into the resulting formula; it is not fitted to the claimed detection. The detectability criterion in Eq. (35) is derived independently from a matched-filter statistic and a Gaussian-noise threshold, and the sensitivity contours in Figs. 2 and 3 simply compare this threshold with the calculated residual amplitude. The only extrapolation beyond the derivation is the asserted sqrt(Np) sensitivity gain when combining multiple MSPs, but that is an optimistic modeling assumption rather than a circular definition or a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The paper itself flags the correlation uncertainty in the Introduction. All cited framework work, especially Ref. [45], is external to the present authors, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central amplitude estimate depends on several hand-chosen input parameters (cluster distances and geometries, binary masses, timing precision, number of measurements), plus order-unity orientation coefficients that are not computed. None of these are fitted to the target result, but the detectability maps are conditional on their chosen values. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • b (impact parameter) = 1 pc (omega Cen), 0.1 pc (M15)
    Chosen by hand to represent typical MSP projected distances; enters the sine/cosine integral argument and affects the residual amplitude when b^2/(2 z_o c/(2 omega_b)) is not much less than 1.
  • z_e (pulsar z-coordinate) = -1 pc (both)
    Chosen to place the pulsar on the far side of the cluster; the residual is insensitive to z_e when the emitter argument is much larger than 1, so this value is not critical.
  • m1+m2 (total binary mass) = 10^4 M_sun (omega Cen), 3e3 M_sun (M15)
    Adopted from current mass constraints and uncertainties; scales the residual amplitude linearly.
  • A1, A2, A3 (orientation coefficients) = 1 (order unity)
    Set to unity; they encode binary inclination and polarization and could vary by factors of order a few, affecting the residual amplitude estimate.
  • N (number of timing measurements) = 100 (current), 100 (future) implicit
    Assumed in the detection threshold estimate A > 4.65 sigma / sqrt(N); an observational input, not fitted.
  • sigma (timing precision) = 10 microseconds (current), 100 ns (future)
    Assumed current and future timing precision; directly sets the threshold.
  • N_p (number of pulsars in array) = O(10)
    Assumed for the mini-PTA sensitivity improvement; the sqrt(N_p) scaling is asserted rather than derived.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Linearized general relativity and the quadrupole formula describe GW emission from the binary (Eqs. 10-12).
    Used throughout; standard in the weak-field, low-velocity limit.
  • domain assumption The IMBH binary is circular and monochromatic, radiating at 2 omega_b (Section II.C).
    Restricts the analysis to circular orbits; eccentric binaries would have harmonics.
  • domain assumption The pulsar's intrinsic acceleration in the cluster is negligible over the observing span or absorbable into the timing model (Section II.A).
    Cites [51-53]; needed so that GW-induced residual is not swamped by Newtonian acceleration.
  • domain assumption The timing noise is white Gaussian with zero mean and variance sigma^2, and the signal is a pure sinusoid unaffected by the timing-model fit (Section IV).
    Used to derive the matched-filter threshold; real pulsar timing has red noise and model-fitting degeneracies.
  • ad hoc to paper Multiple MSPs in a cluster can be combined as independent measurements to improve sensitivity by sqrt(N_p) (Section IV, final paragraph).
    Asserted without derivation; ignores unknown line-of-sight distances and varying signal amplitudes and phases.
  • domain assumption The coefficients A1-A3 and the sine/cosine integral difference are of order unity for the considered geometries (Eqs. 18-24 and 29-30).
    The paper argues this from the scale of the arguments; no explicit calculation for general orientations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detecting Intermediate-mass Black Holes Using Miniature Pulsar Timing Arrays in Globular Clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JRWN7K2X

@misc{pith2026250708201,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detecting Intermediate-mass Black Holes Using Miniature Pulsar Timing Arrays in Globular Clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JRWN7K2X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08201}
}
abstract

Theoretical models predict that intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) exist in globular clusters (GCs), but observational evidence remains elusive. Millisecond pulsars (MSPs), which are abundant in GCs and have served as precise probes for gravitational waves (GWs), offer a unique opportunity to detect potential IMBH binaries in GCs. Here, we consider the possibility of using multiple MSPs in a GC to form a miniature pulsar timing array (PTA), so as to take advantage of their correlated timing residuals to search for potential IMBH binaries in the same cluster. Our semi-analytical calculations reveal that nearby IMBH binaries around MSPs in GCs could induce microsecond-level timing residuals. In GCs like $\omega$ Centauri and M15, favorable configurations are found which could lead to the detection of binaries with mass ratios $q\gtrsim0.1$ and orbital periods of a few days. We estimate that future higher-precision timing programs could achieve $100$-nanosecond sensitivity, substantially expanding the searchable parameter space and establishing mini-PTAs as powerful detectors of IMBHs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08201 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: System configuration and definition of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Timing residual (color map and blue contours) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. V. Sazhin, Opportunities for detecting ultralong grav- itational waves, Sov. Astron.22, 36 (1978)

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    Detweiler, Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves, Astrophys

    S. Detweiler, Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves, Astrophys. J.234, 1100 (1979)

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    R. W. Hellings and G. S. Downs, Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational radiation background from pulsar timing analysis., Astrophys. J. Lett.265, L39 (1983)

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    Agazie, M

    G. Agazie, M. F. Alam, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, L. Blecha, V. Bonidie, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, B. B´ ecsy, C. Chapman, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, T. Co- hen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowter, M. E. Decesar, P. B. Demor- est, T. Dolch, B. Drachler, E. C. Ferrara, ...

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    An- toniadis, P

    EPTA Collaboration, InPTA Collaboration, J. An- toniadis, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam, S. Babak, M. Bagchi, A. S. Bak Nielsen, C. G. Bassa, A. Bathula, A. Berthereau, M. Bonetti, E. Bortolas, P. R. Brook, M. Burgay, R. N. Caballero, A. Chalumeau, D. J. Cham- pion, S. Chanlaridis, S. Chen, I. Cognard, S. Danda- pat, D. Deb, S. Desai, G. Desvignes, N. Dhanda-B...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    D. J. Reardon, A. Zic, R. M. Shannon, G. B. Hobbs, M. Bailes, V. Di Marco, A. Kapur, A. F. Rogers, E. Thrane, J. Askew, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Cameron, M. Cury lo, W. A. Coles, S. Dai, B. Goncharov, M. Kerr, A. Kulkarni, Y. Levin, M. E. Lower, R. N. Manchester, R. Mandow, M. T. Miles, R. S. Nathan, S. Os lowski, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, S. Zhang, and X.-J. Z...

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    H. Xu, S. Chen, Y. Guo, J. Jiang, B. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Xue, R. N. Caballero, J. Yuan, Y. Xu, J. Wang, L. Hao, J. Luo, K. Lee, J. Han, P. Jiang, Z. Shen, M. Wang, N. Wang, R. Xu, X. Wu, R. Manchester, L. Qian, X. Guan, M. Huang, C. Sun, and Y. Zhu, Search- ing for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Da...

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    M. T. Miles, R. M. Shannon, D. J. Reardon, M. Bailes, D. J. Champion, M. Geyer, P. Gitika, K. Grunthal, M. J. Keith, M. Kramer, A. D. Kulkarni, R. S. Nathan, A. Parthasarathy, J. Singha, G. Theureau, E. Thrane, F. Abbate, S. Buchner, A. D. Cameron, F. Camilo, B. E. Moreschi, G. Shaifullah, M. Shamohammadi, A. Pos- senti, and V. V. Krishnan, The MeerKAT Pu...

    arXiv 2025

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    A. G. Lyne, A. Brinklow, J. Middleditch, S. R. Kulkarni, and D. C. Backer, The discovery of a millisecond pulsar in the globular cluster M28, Nature (London)328, 399 (1987)

    1987

  2. [10]

    Pulsars in GCs:https://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/ staff/pfreire/GCpsr.html

  3. [11]

    Yin, L.-Y

    D.-J. Yin, L.-Y. Zhang, B.-D. Li, M.-H. Li, L. Qian, and Z. Pan, The Analyses of Globular Cluster Pulsars and Their Detection Efficiency, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics23, 055012 (2023), arXiv:2303.09710 [astro- 8 ph.HE]

    2023

  4. [12]

    Yin, L.-y

    D. Yin, L.-y. Zhang, L. Qian, R. P. Eatough, B. Li, D. R. Lorimer, Y. Dai, Y. Li, X. Zhang, M. Li, T. Su, Y. Wu, Y. Pan, Y. Lian, T. Liu, Z. Yan, and Z. Pan, F AST Discovery of Eight Isolated Millisecond Pulsars in NGC 6517, Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L7 (2024), arXiv:2405.18228 ...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Y. Wu, Z. Pan, L. Qian, S. M. Ransom, R. P. Eatough, B. Wang, P. C. C. Freire, K. Liu, Z. Yan, J. Luo, L. Zhang, M. Li, D. Yin, B. Li, Y. Li, Y. Dai, Y. Li, X. Zhang, T. Liu, and Y. Pan, The Discovery of Three Pulsars in the Globular Cluster M15 with F AST, Astro- phys. J. Let...

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Z. Pan, L. Qian, X. Ma, K. Liu, L. Wang, J. Luo, Z. Yan, S. Ransom, D. Lorimer, D. Li, and P. Jiang, F AST Glob- ular Cluster Pulsar Survey: Twenty-four Pulsars Discov- ered in 15 Globular Clusters, Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L28 (2021), arXiv:2106.08559 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gao, Y.-X

    S.-J. Gao, Y.-X. Shao, P. Wang, P. Zhou, X.-D. Li, L. Zhang, J. W. Kania, D. R. Lorimer, and D. Li, Dis- covery of a Millisecond Pulsar Associated with Terzan 6, Astrophys. J. Lett.974, L2 (2024), arXiv:2409.10801 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Y. Lian, Z. Pan, H. Zhang, S. Cao, P. C. C. Freire, L. Qian, R. P. Eatough, L. Shao, S. M. Ransom, D. R. Lorimer, D. Yin, Y. Dai, K. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Z. Feng, B. Li, M. Li, T. Liu, Y. Li, B. Peng, Y. Pan, Y. Wu, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, and P. Jiang, The F AST Globu...

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ridolfi, T

    A. Ridolfi, T. Gautam, P. C. C. Freire, S. M. Ransom, S. J. Buchner, A. Possenti, V. Venkatraman Krishnan, M. Bailes, M. Kramer, B. W. Stappers, F. Abbate, E. D. Barr, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, A. Corongiu, A. Jame- son, P. V. Padmanabh, L. Vleeschower, D. J. Champion, W. Chen, M....

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. Das, J. Roy, P. C. C. Freire, S. M. Ransom, B. Bhat- tacharyya, K. Ad´ amek, W. Armour, S. Kudale, and M. V. Muley, Globular Clusters GMRT Pulsar Search (GCGPS) I: Survey description, discovery and tim- ing of the first pulsar in NGC 6093 (M80), arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502....

    2025

  11. [19]

    S. Dai, S. Johnston, M. Kerr, F. Camilo, A. Cameron, L. Toomey, and H. Kumamoto, Discovery of Millisecond Pulsars in the Globular Cluster Omega Centauri, Astro- phys. J. Lett.888, L18 (2020), arXiv:1912.08079 [astro- ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    S. Dai, S. Johnston, M. Kerr, J. Berteaud, B. Bhat- tacharyya, F. Camilo, and E. Keane, Timing of pulsars in the globular cluster omega centauri, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.521, 2616 (2023), arXiv:2303.02834 [astro- ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hessels, A

    J. Hessels, A. Possenti, M. Bailes, C. Bassa, P. C. C. Freire, D. R. Lorimer, R. Lynch, S. M. Ransom, and I. H. Stairs, Pulsars in Globular Clusters with the SKA, inAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Ar- ray (AASKA14)(2015) p. 47, arXiv:1501.00086 [astro- ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Askar, V

    A. Askar, V. F. Baldassare, and M. Mezcua, Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Star Clusters and Dwarf Galaxies, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2311.12118 (2023), arXiv:2311.12118 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Mezcua, Observational evidence for intermediate- mass black holes, International Journal of Modern Physics D26, 1730021 (2017), arXiv:1705.09667 [astro- ph.GA]

    M. Mezcua, Observational evidence for intermediate- mass black holes, International Journal of Modern Physics D26, 1730021 (2017), arXiv:1705.09667 [astro- ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J. E. Greene, J. Strader, and L. C. Ho, Intermediate- Mass Black Holes, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.58, 257 (2020), arXiv:1911.09678 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Baumgardt, J

    H. Baumgardt, J. Makino, and T. Ebisuzaki, Massive Black Holes in Star Clusters. II. Realistic Cluster Models, Astrophys. J.613, 1143 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0406231 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  18. [26]

    S. Lee, H. M. Lee, J.-h. Kim, R. Spurzem, J. Hong, and E. Chung, Formation and Evolution of Compact Bina- ries Containing Intermediate Mass Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters‘, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.22109 (2025), arXiv:2503.22109 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Giersz, N

    M. Giersz, N. Leigh, A. Hypki, N. L¨ utzgendorf, and A. Askar, MOCCA code for star cluster simulations - IV. A new scenario for intermediate mass black hole for- mation in globular clusters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 3150 (2015), arXiv:1506.05234 [astro-ph.GA]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Blecha, N

    L. Blecha, N. Ivanova, V. Kalogera, K. Belczynski, J. Fregeau, and F. Rasio, Close Binary Interactions of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes: Possible Ultralumi- nous X-Ray Sources?, Astrophys. J.642, 427 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0508597 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  21. [29]

    N. W. C. Leigh, N. L¨ utzgendorf, A. M. Geller, T. J. Mac- carone, C. Heinke, and A. Sesana, On the coexistence of stellar-mass and intermediate-mass black holes in globu- lar clusters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.444, 29 (2014), arXiv:1407.4459 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    MacLeod, M

    M. MacLeod, M. Trenti, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The Close Stellar Companions to Intermediate-mass Black Holes, Astrophys. J.819, 70 (2016), arXiv:1508.07000 [astro- ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Arca Sedda, P

    M. Arca Sedda, P. Amaro Seoane, and X. Chen, Merging stellar and intermediate-mass black holes in dense clus- ters: implications for LIGO, LISA, and the next genera- tion of gravitational wave detectors, Astron. Astrophys. 652, A54 (2021), arXiv:2007.13746 [astro-ph.GA]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Konstantinidis, P

    S. Konstantinidis, P. Amaro-Seoane, and K. D. Kokkotas, Investigating the retention of intermediate-mass black holes in star clusters using N-body simulations, Astron. Astrophys.557, A135 (2013), arXiv:1108.5175 [astro- ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Haster, F

    C.-J. Haster, F. Antonini, V. Kalogera, and I. Man- del, N-Body Dynamics of Intermediate Mass-ratio In- spirals in Star Clusters, Astrophys. J.832, 192 (2016), arXiv:1606.07097 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    M. A. G¨ urkan, J. M. Fregeau, and F. A. Rasio, Massive Black Hole Binaries from Collisional Runaways, Astro- phys. J. Lett.640, L39 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0512642 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Amaro-Seoane and M

    P. Amaro-Seoane and M. Freitag, Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Colliding Clusters: Implications for Lower Frequency Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Astrophys. J. Lett.653, L53 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0610478 [astro- ph]. 9

    2006 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Arca Sedda and A

    M. Arca Sedda and A. Mastrobuono-Battisti, Mergers of globular clusters in the Galactic disc: intermediate mass black hole coalescence and implications for gravita- tional waves detection, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1906.05864 (2019), arXiv:1906.05864 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Rasskazov, G

    A. Rasskazov, G. Fragione, and B. Kocsis, Binary Intermediate-mass Black Hole Mergers in Globular Clus- ters, Astrophys. J.899, 149 (2020), arXiv:1912.07681 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Souvaitzis, A

    L. Souvaitzis, A. Rantala, and T. Naab, The role of Mas- sive Black Holes in merging star clusters: dynamical evo- lution, stellar & compact object ejections and gravita- tional waves, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 10.1093/mn- ras/staf458 (2025), arXiv:2503.11813 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. V. Sazhin and M. V. Saphonova, Gravitational Ac- tion of Binaries on Pulsar Timing in Globular Clusters, Astrophys. Space Sci.208, 93 (1993)

    1993

  32. [40]

    Fakir, Detectable time delays from gravity waves\?, Phys

    R. Fakir, Detectable time delays from gravity waves\?, Phys. Rev. D50, 3795 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9306019 [astro-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A. N. Lommen, J. Bilikova, F. A. Jenet, S. Portegies Zwart, and B. W. Stappers, Using Pulsars to Detect Black Hole Binaries in Globular Clusters, inBinary Ra- dio Pulsars, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Confer- ence Series, Vol. 328, edited by F. A. Rasio and I. H. Stairs...

    2005

  34. [42]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Light deflection by gravitational waves from localized sources, Phys. Rev. D 58, 044003 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9802019 [gr-qc]

    1998 arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. M. Kopeikin, G. Sch¨ afer, C. R. Gwinn, and T. M. Eubanks, Astrometric and timing effects of gravitational waves from localized sources, Phys. Rev. D59, 084023 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811003 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  36. [44]

    A. D. Helfer, Light rays, gravitational waves and pulse- time offsets, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.430, 305 (2013), arXiv:1212.2926 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    F. A. Jenet, T. Creighton, and A. Lommen, Pulsar Tim- ing and the Detection of Black Hole Binary Systems in Globular Clusters, Astrophys. J. Lett.627, L125 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505585 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D. R. Madison, D. F. Chernoff, and J. M. Cordes, Pulsar timing perturbations from Galactic gravitational wave bursts with memory, Phys. Rev. D96, 123016 (2017), arXiv:1710.04974 [astro-ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    B. B. P. Perera, B. W. Stappers, A. G. Lyne, C. G. Bassa, I. Cognard, L. Guillemot, M. Kramer, G. Theureau, and G. Desvignes, Evidence for an intermediate-mass black hole in the globular cluster NGC 6624, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.468, 2114 (2017), arXiv:1705.01612 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    timing residual

    and M15 [49], coupled with ongoing discoveries and monitoring of new MSPs in these clusters [13, 19, 20]. II. THEOR Y A. Timing residual Figure 1 illustrates the system of our interest (also see Fig. 1 in Ref. [45]). Both the GW source and the pulsar reside in a GC which is fa...

  41. [49]

    Huang, Q

    Y. Huang, Q. Li, J. Liu, X. Dong, H. Zhang, Y. Lu, and C. Du, A high-velocity star recently ejected by an intermediate-mass black hole in M15, National Science Review12, 347 (2025), arXiv:2406.00923 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    H¨ aberle, N

    M. H¨ aberle, N. Neumayer, A. Seth, A. Bellini, M. Li- bralato, H. Baumgardt, M. Whitaker, A. Dumont, M. Alfaro-Cuello, J. Anderson, C. Clontz, N. Kacharov, S. Kamann, A. Feldmeier-Krause, A. Milone, M. S. Nitschai, R. Pechetti, and G. van de Ven, Fast-moving stars around an i...

    2024

  43. [51]

    pulsar term

    and the timescale for the acceleration to change is typically 10 2 −10 3 years [52, 53]. Therefore, during an observational period of, say, ten years, the second time derivate of the pulsar period is too small to detect [52] unless rare close encounters happen [53]. As a resul...

  44. [52]

    Anholm, S

    M. Anholm, S. Ballmer, J. D. E. Creighton, L. R. Price, and X. Siemens, Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data, Phys. Rev. D79, 084030 (2009), arXiv:0809.0701 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    B. J. Prager, S. M. Ransom, P. C. C. Freire, J. W. T. Hessels, I. H. Stairs, P. Arras, and M. Cadelano, Using Long-term Millisecond Pulsar Timing to Obtain Physical Characteristics of the Bulge Globular Cluster Terzan 5, Astrophys. J.845, 148 (2017), arXiv:1612.04395 [astro- ph.SR]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    R. D. Blandford, R. W. Romani, and J. H. Applegate, Timing a millisecond pulsar in a globular cluster., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.225, 51P (1987)

    1987

  47. [55]

    E. S. Phinney, Pulsars as Probes of Newtonian Dynami- cal Systems, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety of London Series A341, 39 (1992)

    1992

  48. [56]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Pres, 2007)

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Pres, 2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational Radiation from Point Masses in a Keplerian Orbit, Physical Review 131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  50. [58]

    Ba˜ nares-Hern´ andez, F

    A. Ba˜ nares-Hern´ andez, F. Calore, J. M. Camalich, and J. I. Read, New constraints on the central mass contents of Omega Centauri from combined stellar kinematics and pulsar timing, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.00939 (2024), arXiv:2408.00939 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Gerssen, R

    J. Gerssen, R. P. van der Marel, K. Gebhardt, P. Guhathakurta, R. C. Peterson, and C. Pryor, Hub- ble Space Telescope Evidence for an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole in the Globular Cluster M15. II. Kinematic Analysis and Dynamical Modeling, Astron. J.124, 3270 (2002), arXiv:astr...

    2002 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Baumgardt, P

    H. Baumgardt, P. Hut, J. Makino, S. McMillan, and S. Portegies Zwart, On the Central Structure of M15, Astrophys. J. Lett.582, L21 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0210133 [astro-ph]

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.