Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 2 cited by

High-post-Newtonian-order dynamical effects induced by tail-of-tail interactions in a two body system

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Starting from a single conservative tail-of-tail action, this paper derives the complete 5.5PN and 6.5PN two-body dynamics and confirms the new coefficients against self-force and high-precision scattering results.

desk verdict New 6.5PN tail-of-tail results are real and carefully checked, but the O(ν²) pieces rest entirely on the companion action, so review should treat that action as part of the claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08708 v1 pith:QUFRXSGA submitted 2025-07-11 gr-qc

Donato Bini , Thibault Damour , Andrea Geralico This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords tail-of-tailinteractionspost-Newtonianexpansionpost-Minkowskianeffectiveone-bodyHamiltonianDelaunayscatteringanglegravitationaltwo-bodyproblemself-force
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a single recently derived conservative action — the tail-of-tail interaction, in which gravitational waves emitted by a binary scatter off the curvature generated by the binary itself — accounts for all new two-body dynamics at 5.5 and 6.5 post-Newtonian orders. Working from that action, the authors compute the orbit-averaged (Delaunay) Hamiltonian of slightly eccentric bound orbits, its effective-one-body transcription, and the scattering angle of hyperbolic encounters up to eighth post-Minkowskian order. The four effective-one-body coefficients and the four new scattering-angle terms are the paper's concrete deliverables. The paper shows that the terms visible at first self-force order agree exactly with independent black-hole perturbation results, and that the full scattering result agrees with the newest fifth-post-Minkowskian computation once radiation reaction is included.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-symmetric tail-of-tail action (Eq. 1.2): a non-local-in-time two-body action with logarithmic kernel $\ln(c|t-t'|/2r_0)$, bilinear in even- and odd-parity mass and current multipole moments. For explicit calculation the authors pass to an equivalent time-split principal-value form (Eq. 2.6), keeping the quadrupole sector at fractional 1PN order and the quadrupole-current and octupole sectors at leading order. They then evaluate that action along 1PN-accurate quasi-Keplerian elliptic or hyperbolic orbits, using Delaunay averaging for bound motion, frequency-domain multipole moments for scattering, and a transcription from the averaged harmonic Hamiltonian to the effective-one-body (geodesic-in-an-effective-metric) potentials $A(u,\nu)$ and $\bar{D}(u,\nu)$. This machinery turns the abstract action into concrete Hamiltonian and scattering observables.

What would settle it

Compute the 5.5PN and 6.5PN effective-one-body coefficients by a second-order self-force calculation (or by an independent 6PM through 8PM amplitude-based scattering computation) and compare with Eqs. (3.15) and (4.15): the $\nu^2$ terms and the $j^{-6}$, $j^{-7}$, $j^{-8}$ terms are new enough that any mismatch would falsify the input action. A more direct check would be a first-principles derivation of $\beta_2$ and $\beta_3$; a value different from $-214/105$ or $-26/21$ for either coefficient would invalidate the paper's central numbers.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the all-multipole tail-of-tail action of Eq. (1.2), with $\beta$ coefficients $\beta_2 = -214/105$ and $\beta_3 = -26/21$ and equal odd- and even-parity $\beta$ functions, produces a definite set of high-order dynamical effects. At the 6.5PN level the paper obtains the Delaunay-averaged tail-of-tail Hamiltonian and the effective-one-body potentials $a_{6.5} = \frac{13696}{525}\nu\pi$, $a_{7.5} = -\frac{10052}{225}\nu^2\pi - \frac{512501}{3675}\nu\pi$, $\bar{d}_{5.5} = \frac{264932}{1575}\nu\pi$, $\bar{d}_{6.5} = -\frac{893149}{2450}\nu^2\pi - \frac{21288791}{17640}\nu\pi$, together with a scattering angle through 8PM order. The $O(\nu)$ parts of the effective-one-body coefficients reproduce the first-order self-force results, and the 5PM scattering coefficient agrees at 6.5PN with an independent recent computation after adding a linear radiation-reaction piece built from the newly computed radiated angular momentum $J_4$. The paper's claim is that these agreements confirm the structure of the input action, while the new $\nu^2$ (second self-force) terms extend previous knowledge.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation rests on the recently derived tail-of-tail action being correct, in particular on the two numerical renormalization coefficients ($\beta_2 = -214/105$, $\beta_3 = -26/21$) and on the claim that odd- and even-parity multipoles share the same renormalization; if that input is wrong, the new coefficients are wrong even though some first-order self-force checks could still line up.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full 5.5PN and 6.5PN effective-one-body Hamiltonian of the two-body problem is now available at all orders in the mass ratio (up to the neglected quartic-momentum terms), so waveform models can incorporate these half-integer terms directly.
  • The conservative part of the 5PM scattering coefficient is now known to 6.5PN, and new 6PM through 8PM terms are predicted; these are concrete numbers that future amplitude-based or self-force calculations can target.
  • The exact match with first-order self-force results independently confirms the value of the odd-parity quadrupole beta coefficient and therefore the multipole renormalization scheme used in the action.
  • The appearance of $\zeta(3)$ at the G7/6.5PN level indicates a new transcendental structure in tail-of-tail scattering that any alternative derivation must reproduce.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step not taken in the paper is to extend the Delaunay computation to fourth order in eccentricity, which would yield the tail-of-tail contribution to the effective-one-body Q potential; the paper explicitly notes that fourth-order eccentricity data are required for Q.
  • The frequency-domain form of the tail-of-tail action is close enough to the linear-tail radiated-energy integrals that the same Mellin-transform technique could be adapted to compute tail-of-tail corrections to gravitational-wave energy and angular-momentum fluxes, not just the conservative scattering angle.
  • Because the new 8PM terms in Eq. (4.15) go beyond the first self-force order, they provide a target for an independent second-order self-force or amplitude computation; if a future calculation disagrees with the $\nu^2$ coefficients in Eq. (3.15), the input beta coefficients, not the averaging machinery, would be the likely culprit.
  • The equality of the odd- and even-parity beta coefficients is confirmed here only indirectly; a direct first-principles derivation of $\beta_2$ and $\beta_3$ would remove the main residual uncertainty in the input action.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper derives conservative dynamical effects of gravitational tail-of-tail interactions in a binary system at 6.5PN accuracy and up to 8PM order, building on the all-multipole tail-of-tail action recently proposed in the companion preprint by two of the authors (Eq. (1.2)). The authors compute the averaged Delaunay Hamiltonian for slightly eccentric elliptic orbits and transcribe it into EOB potentials, obtaining the half-integer-order coefficients in Eq. (3.15). They also compute the conservative scattering angle for hyperbolic orbits up to 8PM order, given in Eq. (4.15). The O(ν) parts of the EOB coefficients agree with earlier first-order self-force results, and after adding radiation-reaction contributions using a recent computation of J4 from Ref. [34], the 5PM scattering coefficient agrees with the worldline computation of Driesse et al. up to 6.5PN. New O(ν²) terms are reported that complete the EOB Hamiltonian at these orders.

Significance. If the input action is correct, the paper provides valuable high-PN/PM predictions for two-body dynamics, extending the EOB Hamiltonian and scattering angle to orders not currently available from other methods. The agreements with independent self-force and amplitude-based results are non-trivial and support the correctness of the underlying tail-of-tail action, including a check of the odd-parity beta coefficient. The genuinely new O(ν²) coefficients inherit their entire content from the companion action (1.2), which is not independently verified here; the paper is transparent about this, and these terms should be regarded as predictions awaiting independent confirmation. The manuscript is a solid contribution, with clear analytic derivations and explicit final expressions.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, footnote after Eq. (3.15)] The statement that 'A6.5 belongs to the 5.5PN level' is confusing because a6.5 is the coefficient of u^{13/2}, which is usually associated with the 6.5PN order; please clarify the convention for labeling PN order in the EOB potentials.
  2. [Conclusions (Section VI)] The central new results depend on the companion preprint action (1.2) and on the J4 computation of Ref. [34], both of which are unreviewed. The authors should explicitly state in the conclusions that the O(ν²) terms in Eqs. (3.15) and (4.15) are predictions that await independent verification.
  3. [Eq. (3.15) and surrounding text] The subscripts a6.5, a7.5, d̄5.5, and d̄6.5 would benefit from a brief definition stating that they denote the power of u (e.g., a6.5 multiplies u^{13/2}); this would help the reader connect the notation to the standard PN ordering.
  4. [Section III, text after Eq. (3.15)] There is a typo: 'while ¯d6.5 and the ν term in ¯d7.5 agree with Eq. (5) in [38]' should read 'the ν term in ¯d6.5', since no ¯d7.5 appears in the results.
  5. [Section II, Eq. (2.6)] The notation in Eq. (2.6) is slightly dense; adding parentheses to separate the even-parity and odd-parity contributions would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 6.5PN coefficients and scattering observables are derived algebraically from the cited tail-of-tail action (1.2), whose beta coefficients come from prior independent computations, and the new results pass genuine external checks (1SF/MST results; the Nature 2025 5PM comparison).

full rationale

The derivation chain is: input tail-of-tail action (1.2), attributed in the abstract to the companion preprint arXiv:2504.20204 by two of the present authors, with the beta coefficients β2 = −214/105 and β3 = −26/21 (2.8) sourced to Refs. [22, 27, 28, 29–31] rather than fitted here; time-split form (2.6); averaged Delaunay Hamiltonian (3.11); EOB coefficients (3.15) obtained by the algebraic matching of the action-derived Hamiltonian with the EOB transcription (B18); and scattering angle (4.15) obtained by frequency-domain evaluation of the action followed by χ = ∂S/∂J. No parameter is fitted to any output, and no quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is said to predict: the EOB coefficients are computed consequences, not free parameters tuned to the checked data. The checks are genuine external anchors: the four O(ν) EOB coefficients agree with independent 1SF results [37, 38] based on MST black-hole perturbation theory and the first law, which predate and do not assume the action; the 6.5PN 5PM scattering coefficient is compared with the independent worldline-EFT computation of Driesse et al. [32] after adding radiation reaction whose J4 input comes from the coauthor's separate MST computation [34] — a joint cross-check of two independent calculations, not a loop. The transparently new ν² parts of a7.5 and d̄6.5, and the G7/G8 pieces of (4.15), inherit the companion action's correctness, and the O(ν) and 5PM checks do not isolate the ν² sector; the paper is candid about this in its concluding remark that the ζ(3) piece 'would be interesting to check ... against other computations.' This is an external-sourcing/verification limitation of the genuinely new predictions, which the skeptical reading correctly identifies, but under the strict definitions used here (Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction), no circular step is exhibited. The self-citations are load-bearing but are anchored by independent derivations of the beta coefficients and by multiple external benchmark agreements, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, no ansatz is smuggled via citation, and no known result is merely renamed. Hence the appropriate finding is a low score reflecting the companion-paper dependency rather than actual circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced. The central claim rests on the correctness of the tail-of-tail action from companion work, the beta-coefficient values, and the J4 input used for the radiation-reaction comparison.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The all-multipole conservative tail-of-tail action (Eq. 1.2), as derived in arXiv:2504.20204, is correct.
    The paper starts from this action and does not re-derive it; all subsequent results inherit its correctness. The beta coefficients β2 = -214/105 and β3 = -26/21 are taken from earlier work [22,27,29-31].
  • domain assumption Odd-parity beta coefficients equal even-parity ones, β_l^(odd) = β_l^(even).
    Used in Eq. (2.6) and throughout; supported by Ref. [31] erratum and Refs. [29,30], but assumed here.
  • domain assumption The quasi-Keplerian parametrization of elliptic and hyperbolic orbits at 1PN accuracy is valid for computing the required averages.
    Used in Sections III and IV; standard in the PN literature but necessary for the averaging and scattering calculations.
  • domain assumption The linear radiation-reaction contribution to the scattering angle is given by Eq. (5.3), and the J4 coefficients from Refs. [33,34] are correct.
    Used in Section V to compare with Driesse et al.; relies on a very recent result by coauthor Geralico [34] that is not yet independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-post-Newtonian-order dynamical effects induced by tail-of-tail interactions in a two body system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QUFRXSGA

@misc{pith2026250708708,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-post-Newtonian-order dynamical effects induced by tail-of-tail interactions in a two body system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QUFRXSGA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08708}
}
read the original abstract

Starting from the recently derived conservative tail-of-tail action [D. Bini and T. Damour, arXiv:2504.20204 [hep-th]] we compute several dynamical observables of binary systems (Delaunay Hamiltonian, scattering angle), at the 6.5 post-Newtonian accuracy and up to the 8th post-Minkowskian order. We find perfect agreement with previous self-force results, and (when inserting a recent high-post-Newtonian order derivation of radiated angular momentum [A. Geralico, arXiv:2507.03442 [gr-qc]]) with state-of-the-art post-Minkowskian scattering results [M.~Driesse et al., Nature \textbf{641}, no.8063, 603-607 (2025)].

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New 5.5PN and 6.5PN tail-of-tail terms for the non-geodesic EOB potential and the second-order self-force redshift of eccentric binaries, through e^12 and p_r^12.

  2. High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors compute tail-of-tail contributions to the effective-one-body Q potential through p_r^12 and derive new second-order self-force redshift predictions for eccentric binaries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [34]

    Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum,

    A. Geralico, “Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum,” [arXiv:2507.03442 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,

    L. Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel. 17, 2 (2014) [arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [2]

    Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,

    T. Damour, “Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no.10, 104015 (2016) [arXiv:1609.00354 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [3]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,

    T. Damour, “High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.4, 044038 (2018) [arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Gravitational spin-orbit cou- pling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approxima- tion and effective one-body theory,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational spin-orbit cou- pling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approxima- tion and effective one-body theory,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no.10, 104038 (2017) [arXiv:1709.00590 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [5]

    Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,

    J. Vines, “Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no.8, 084002 (2018) [arXiv:1709.06016 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Grav- ity,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, A. Cristofoli and P. H. Damgaard, “Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Grav- ity,” JHEP 08, 038 (2020) [arXiv:1910.09366 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,” JHEP 11, 106 (2020) [arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Classical and quantum scattering in post- Minkowskian gravity,

    T. Damour, “Classical and quantum scattering in post- Minkowskian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.2, 024060 (2020) [arXiv:1912.02139 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, “Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP 02, 048 (2021) [arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity,

    L. Barack and A. Pound, “Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, no.1, 016904 (2019) [arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0409156 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Effective field theory meth- ods to model compact binaries,

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Effective field theory meth- ods to model compact binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31, no.4, 043001 (2014) [arXiv:1309.3474 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [13]

    The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,

    R. A. Porto, “The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,” Phys. Rept. 633, 1-104 (2016) [arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Near and far zones in two-body dynamics: An effective field theory perspective,

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Near and far zones in two-body dynamics: An effective field theory perspective,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.2, 024069 (2021) [arXiv:2103.03190 [gr- qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999) [arXiv:gr-qc/9811091]

    1999 arXiv

  9. [16]

    On the determination of the last stable orbit for circular gen- eral relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian ap- proximation,

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, “On the determination of the last stable orbit for circular gen- eral relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian ap- proximation,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 084011 (2000) [arXiv:gr- qc/0005034]

    2000

  10. [17]

    Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, no.23, 231104 (2019) [arXiv:1909.02375 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Binary dynamics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Binary dynamics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.2, 024062 (2020) [arXiv:2003.11891 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary systems,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary systems,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.2, 024061 (2020) [arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Sixth post- Newtonian nonlocal-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post- Newtonian nonlocal-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.8, 084047 (2020) [arXiv:2007.11239 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Gravitational scattering at the seventh order in 13 G: nonlocal contribution at the sixth post-Newtonian accuracy,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Laporta and P. Mas- trolia, “Gravitational scattering at the seventh order in 13 G: nonlocal contribution at the sixth post-Newtonian accuracy,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.4, 044038 (2021) [arXiv:2012.12918 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System,” Phys. Rev. D 37, 1410 (1988)

    1988

  16. [23]

    Tail terms in gravitational ra- diation reaction via effective field theory,

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Tail terms in gravitational ra- diation reaction via effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 87, no.4, 044056 (2013) [arXiv:1111.5488 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Tail effect in gravitational radiation reaction: Time nonlocality and renormalization group evolution,

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto and A. Ross, “Tail effect in gravitational radiation reaction: Time nonlocality and renormalization group evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 124010 (2016) [arXiv:1511.07379 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Nonlocal-in- time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems,

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, “Nonlocal-in- time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.6, 064058 (2014) [arXiv:1401.4548 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Fourth post- Newtonian effective one-body dynamics,

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, “Fourth post- Newtonian effective one-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 91, no.8, 084024 (2015) [arXiv:1502.07245 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Gravitational wave tails of tails,

    L. Blanchet, “Gravitational wave tails of tails,” Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 113-141 (1998) [erratum: Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 3381 (2005)] [arXiv:gr-qc/9710038 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory,

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, “Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 124015 (2010) [arXiv:0912.4254 [gr-qc]]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from su- persymmetric gauge theories,

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Russo, “Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from su- persymmetric gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.4, 044054 (2025) [arXiv:2408.07329 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,

    M. M. Ivanov, Y. Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and Z. Zhou, “Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,” [arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Gravitational multipole renormalization,

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Gravitational multipole renormalization,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 084095 (2021) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 111, no.12, 129901 (2025)] [arXiv:2107.02634 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Emer- gence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black- hole scattering,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch, “Emer- gence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black- hole scattering,” Nature 641, no.8063, 603-607 (2025) [arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Radiation-reaction and angular momen- tum loss at O(G4),

    C. Heissenberg, “Radiation-reaction and angular momen- tum loss at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.12, 126012 (2025) [arXiv:2501.02904 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079-1096 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9603020 [gr-qc]]

    1996 arXiv

  28. [36]

    The First Law of Binary Black Hole Mechanics in General Rela- tivity and Post-Newtonian Theory,

    A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet and B. F. Whiting, “The First Law of Binary Black Hole Mechanics in General Rela- tivity and Post-Newtonian Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 064039 (2012) [arXiv:1111.5378 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Analytic determination of the eight-and-a-half post-Newtonian self-force contributions to the two-body gravitational interaction potential,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Analytic determination of the eight-and-a-half post-Newtonian self-force contributions to the two-body gravitational interaction potential,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.10, 104047 (2014) [arXiv:1403.2366 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    New gravitational self-force analytical results for eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “New gravitational self-force analytical results for eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 93, no.10, 104017 (2016) [arXiv:1601.02988 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    High Precision Black Hole Scat- tering: Tutti Frutti vs Worldline Effective Field Theory,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “High Precision Black Hole Scat- tering: Tutti Frutti vs Worldline Effective Field Theory,” [arXiv:2504.20204 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 084031 (2021) [arXiv:2107.08896 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Multipolar invariants and the eccentricity enhancement function parametrization of gravitational radiation,

    D. Bini and A. Geralico, “Multipolar invariants and the eccentricity enhancement function parametrization of gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.12, 124001 (2022) [arXiv:2204.08077 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gravitational radiation reac- tion along general orbits in the effective one-body formal- ism,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational radiation reac- tion along general orbits in the effective one-body formal- ism,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 124012 (2012) [arXiv:1210.2834 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Radiative classical gravitational observables at O(G3) from scattering amplitudes,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng, “Radiative classical gravitational observables at O(G3) from scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 10, 148 (2021) [arXiv:2104.03957 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto, “Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, no.10, 101401 (2023) [arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Radiative contribution to classical gravita- tional scattering at the third order in G,

    T. Damour, “Radiative contribution to classical gravita- tional scattering at the third order in G,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.12, 124008 (2020) [arXiv:2010.01641 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Radi- ated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Clas- sical Scattering,

    A. V. Manohar, A. K. Ridgway and C. H. Shen, “Radi- ated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Clas- sical Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.12, 121601 (2022) [arXiv:2203.04283 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Radiated mo- mentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiated mo- mentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.2, 024012 (2023) [arXiv:2210.07165 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.