The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2507.08834 · v1 · pith:LZPFW62B · submitted 2025-07-07 · cs.LG

Physical Informed Neural Networks for modeling ocean pollutant

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:LZPFW62Brecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG
keywords dataneuralapproachboundaryinitialmodelingnetworkphysical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Traditional numerical methods often struggle with the complexity and scale of modeling pollutant transport across vast and dynamic oceanic domains. This paper introduces a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework to simulate the dispersion of pollutants governed by the 2D advection-diffusion equation. The model achieves physically consistent predictions by embedding physical laws and fitting to noisy synthetic data, generated via a finite difference method (FDM), directly into the neural network training process. This approach addresses challenges such as non-linear dynamics and the enforcement of boundary and initial conditions. Synthetic data sets, augmented with varying noise levels, are used to capture real-world variability. The training incorporates a hybrid loss function including PDE residuals, boundary/initial condition conformity, and a weighted data fit term. The approach takes advantage of the Julia language scientific computing ecosystem for high-performance simulations, offering a scalable and flexible alternative to traditional solvers

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mass-Conserving Physics-Informed Neural Networks For The One-Dimensional Advection-Diffusion Equation

    physics.comp-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Adding a soft mass-conservation penalty to PINNs for the 1D advection-diffusion equation reduces long-term relative L2 error by 9–67× and mass error by 15–215× compared to vanilla PINNs across Peclet numbers 0.01–20.