Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Long-range to the Rescue of Yang-Baxter II

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Four-magnon eigenstates of the XZ-sector spin chain are constructed explicitly from the three-magnon solution and are shown to obey an infinite tower of Yang–Baxter equations.

desk verdict A real extension of Part I with credible brute-force checks, but the four-to-three magnon recursion leans on an unproven pole ansatz that needs justification before the structural claim can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08934 v1 pith:SL5DWJ2G submitted 2025-07-11 hep-th

Deniz N. Bozkurt , Juan Miguel Nieto García , Ziwen Kong , Elli Pomoni This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords long-rangeBetheansatzfour-magnoneigenstatesmodifiedYang-BaxterequationsZ2orbifoldN=2superconformalquiverspinchainspectrumanomalousdimensionsposition-dependentcorrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the four-magnon sector of the XZ spin chain—the nearest-neighbor Hamiltonian that encodes one-loop anomalous dimensions in a marginally deformed $\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold of $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills—can be solved by a long-range Bethe ansatz, despite the ordinary coordinate Bethe ansatz failing here. The paper constructs explicit four-magnon eigenvectors whose position-dependent corrections are generated from the previously solved three-magnon solution, and it shows that the resulting four-magnon data obey an infinite tower of modified Yang–Baxter equations. Because the four-magnon states close under periodic boundary conditions, both twisted and untwisted, these eigenvectors determine anomalous dimensions of single-trace operators, and the paper verifies them against brute-force diagonalization of the Hamiltonian for chains of length 4, 5, and 6. If correct, the result means that a small set of two-magnon scattering data plus the three-magnon long-range corrections fixes the four-magnon eigenstates and points toward a recursive construction for arbitrary magnon number.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the smearing pole ansatz, Eqs. (5.25)–(5.26): as one magnon momentum $p_4$ is scaled to zero and the generating-function variable $z$ approaches 1, the four-magnon generating function is required to behave as $G^{(4)}(x,y,z)\sim(1-e^{ip_4}z)^{-1}G^{(3)}(x,y)$. This imposed pole is what converts the infinite sum over the smeared magnon's position into a finite residue proportional to the three-magnon generating function, and Section 6 uses exactly this asymptotic behavior to eliminate all remaining undetermined position-dependent corrections and write the four-magnon solution in terms of three-magnon data, Eq. (6.29). The second load-bearing object is the generalized Yang operator $Y^{n,m,r}_j$, a diagonal map acting on the four allowed kinematic color sectors; the identities $Y_j(p_{\alpha_j})Y_j(p)=1$ and (7.20) hold for every $(n,m,r)$, which is what produces the infinite tower of modified Yang–Baxter equations.

What would settle it

Extend the brute-force comparison to chain length $L=7$ in the four-magnon sector and to the five-magnon sector: the logic of the paper predicts a matching pole at $z=1$ in the five-magnon generating function with residue the four-magnon generating function, and matching eigenvalues. A direct coefficient-by-coefficient check that $\lim_{p_4\to0}(1-e^{ip_4})G^{(4)}$ equals $G^{(3)}$ for all separations, not only the $n+m+r\le 8$ order reported, would also settle the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that explicit four-magnon eigenstates of the XZ-sector spin chain exist in long-range Bethe ansatz form—plane waves dressed by position-dependent corrections encoded in a three-variable generating function—and that these states have a recursive structure. The four-magnon generating function in Eq. (6.29) is built entirely out of the two three-magnon special solutions, with the remaining freedom fixed so that averaging over the position of one magnon (with its momentum scaled to zero) reproduces the corresponding three-magnon eigenstate. The resulting Yang operators $Y^{n,m,r}_j$ satisfy the modified Yang–Baxter equation (7.20) for every triple of separation integers, generating an infinite tower of Yang–Baxter equations. Imposing twisted or untwisted periodic boundary conditions at the level of wavefunctions then yields finite-chain eigenstates whose energies match brute-force diagonalization for $L=4,5,6$, which is the paper's route to anomalous dimensions of single-trace operators.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the imposed smearing pole ansatz that when one magnon's momentum is scaled to zero, the four-magnon generating function has exactly the simple pole $(1-e^{ip_4}z)^{-1}$ with residue equal to the three-magnon generating function; this pole is assumed rather than derived from the Hamiltonian, and if the true pole structure differs, the recursive four-to-three reduction and the claimed reconstruction collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The four-magnon eigenvalues coincide with brute-force diagonalization for chain lengths 4, 5, and 6, so the long-range Bethe ansatz is a working tool for single-trace anomalous dimensions in both twisted and untwisted sectors.
  • Because the four-magnon state reduces to the three-magnon state under the smearing limit, the same averaging procedure is the natural candidate for constructing $M$-magnon eigenstates from $(M-1)$-magnon data, which the paper leaves as an open direction.
  • The infinite tower of modified Yang–Baxter equations provides a concrete signature that a permutation-symmetric, integrability-like structure survives even though the two-magnon scattering coefficients do not satisfy the ordinary Yang–Baxter equation.
  • At the orbifold point $\kappa=1$ all position-dependent corrections vanish, recovering the ordinary coordinate Bethe ansatz and the decoupled two-copy XXX chain, so the long-range corrections are a pure effect of the marginal deformation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the smearing pole ansatz holds at every magnon number, then the entire eigenstate hierarchy is fixed by the one- and two-magnon data; the five-magnon sector is the immediate test, since smearing one magnon there should reproduce the four-magnon solution constructed here.
  • Editorial inference: the position-dependent corrections may be an artifact of using momenta rather than rapidities; if a rapidity parametrization (possibly elliptic) exists, the infinite tower of Yang–Baxter equations might collapse into one dynamical Yang–Baxter equation with coassociator factors, connecting this construction to elliptic quantum groupoid models.
  • Editorial inference: the open-infinite and closed-finite position-dependent corrections are likely related by the truncation $t^{L-4}G(x/t,y/t,z/t)\to G(x,y,z,t)$ once the missing boundary term is found; testing this map at $L=7$ would turn the periodic-boundary computation into a practical recursion rather than a case-by-case solution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs explicit four-magnon eigenvectors for the XZ-sector nearest-neighbor spin chain of the marginally deformed Z2 orbifold of N=4 SYM, using a long-range Bethe ansatz with position-dependent corrections encoded in generating functions. It introduces a smearing procedure intended to relate M+1-magnon eigenstates to M-magnon eigenstates, uses this to express the four-magnon generating function in terms of the three-magnon solution, derives a tower of modified Yang-Baxter equations, and imposes periodic boundary conditions for short chains (L=4,5,6) with comparisons to brute-force diagonalization.

Significance. If the recursive reduction and the Yang-Baxter tower are genuine, this is a significant step toward understanding non-standard integrable structures in quiver gauge theories, and it would provide a practical method for computing anomalous dimensions of single-trace operators. The paper contains substantial explicit algebraic work, a machine-checkable Mathematica file, and nontrivial numerical validation at L=5 (about 7 digits) and L=6 (about 0.05 relative error). However, the central recursive claim is currently conditional on an unproven pole ansatz and on a particular non-unique branch of the special solution, so the significance is provisional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.26)] The smearing pole ansatz is assumed rather than derived. The text says the generating function 'must necessarily' develop poles and then states 'We expect this divergence to occur in a controlled way', with (5.26) as the proposed form. Section 6 then uses exactly this asymptotic behavior (e.g., Eqs. (6.6)-(6.14) and the final form (6.29)) to eliminate the remaining freedom in the four-magnon generating function. Consequently, the claimed reduction of four-magnon data to three-magnon data is partly built into the ansatz rather than established by the eigenvalue equations of Section 3. The L=5 and L=6 brute-force checks test finitely many eigenvectors and do not prove that every solution of the open-chain equations has the required pole. Please either derive (5.26) from the Hamiltonian equations or explicitly reframe the result as a conditional construction of a family of eigenstates, stating which claims (recursion, Yang-Baxter tower) depend on the unproven pole structure.
  2. [Section 8.2, L=6 paragraph] The reported validation is weaker than claimed. The text states that the momentum solution (8.76) 'correctly matches the brute force diagonalization with a relative error of 0.05'; this is roughly two significant digits, and the procedure leaves one position-dependent coefficient D^{0,0,0,1}_sigma undetermined and fixes it through the same periodicity equations. Thus the claimed compatibility with periodic boundary conditions and the brute-force comparison are not established at the precision suggested by the abstract. Please provide a quantitative error analysis for the eigenvector (not only the momenta), or present the L=6 result as a qualitative proof of concept and adjust the wording accordingly.
  3. [Sections 4.1 and 6, Eqs. (4.8)-(4.14)] The constructed solution is non-unique. After Eqs. (4.8)-(4.14) the authors state that setting D^{0,1,0}_sigma=0 is a representative choice with no compelling reason, and Section 6 begins by saying the solution is not claimed to be unique. Since the recursive four-to-three relation and the modified Yang-Baxter tower of Section 7 are derived for this particular branch, the statement that 'four-magnon eigenstates can be written in terms of the three-magnon solution' is a property of a chosen branch, not of the model. Please specify the chosen branch precisely and test whether the recursive relations survive alternative choices, for example D^{0,1,0}_sigma = (kappa - kappa^{-1}) A_sigma.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title contains a spacing typo: 'Y ang-Baxter' should be 'Yang-Baxter'.
  2. [Section 6, after Eq. (6.5)] The word 'excatly' should be 'exactly'.
  3. [Section 8.2, Eq. (8.73)] The list of wavefunction ratios contains duplicate entries (e.g., psi_11(0,0,0,2) appears twice); the list should be deduplicated to match the number of independent position states.
  4. [Appendix B and Mathematica file] The Mathematica file 'fourmagnon.np' is referenced but not described; a short statement of what it contains and how to reproduce the key checks would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The four-to-three recursion is built in via the smearing pole ansatz (5.25)-(5.26), and the Yang-Baxter tower is a diagonal-operator identity.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.25)-(5.27)]
    "Consequently, the four-magnon generating function must necessarily develop poles at \(z=1\) as the momentum variable localizes at \(\bar p=0\). ... An asymptotic behavior consistent with this expectation is given by \[\tilde G^{(4)}_\sigma(x,y,z) \sim \frac{1}{1-e^{ip_{\sigma(4)}} z} \tilde G^{(3)}_\sigma(x,y), \quad z\to 1\]"

    Eq. (5.26) is the exact pole/residue relation that Section 5.3 then uses in Eq. (5.27) to conclude that smearing the fourth magnon recovers the three-magnon solution. This is imposed as an expectation ('must necessarily', 'An asymptotic behavior consistent with this expectation'), not derived from the Hamiltonian eigenvalue equations in Sections 3-4. Section 6 imports the same asymptotics to fix the remaining freedom, so the claim that four-magnon data reduce to three-magnon data is an input of the construction, not an output. Brute-force checks on L=4,5,6 are finite-length and, for L=6, only match to relative error 0.05; they do not verify the open-infinite pole structure on which the recursion rests.

  2. self definitional [Section 6, Eqs. (6.6)-(6.7), final form (6.29)]
    "From the asymptotic behavior of these generating functions under the smearing limit, given in (5.50) and (5.51), we expect to have \[\tilde G^{(4)}_{ijkl}(0,y,z)=\frac{\tilde G^{(3)}_{ijk}(0,y)f_1(y)}{(1-e^{ip_l}z)f_2(y,z)}+f_3(y,z),\quad \partial_x\tilde G^{(4)}_{ijkl}(0,y,z)=\frac{\partial_x\tilde G^{(3)}_{ijk}(0,y)}{1-e^{ip_l}z}+f_4(y,z).\]"

    The four-magnon generating function is written a priori as three-magnon generating functions times the pole \((1-e^{ip_l}z)^{-1}\). Solving the interaction equations with this ansatz and assembling (6.29) can only produce a four-magnon solution with precisely that pre-assigned pole/residue structure. Thus the 'reconstruction' of four-magnon eigenstates from three-magnon data is definitional: the final generating function is a recombination of the assumed expression. The only independent content is the short-chain brute-force matching, which tests finitely many eigenvectors rather than the recursive open-chain relation.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Section 7.2, Eqs. (7.17)-(7.20)]
    "In this case the Yang operator is given as \[Y^{n,m,r}_1(\vec p)=S_\kappa(p_1,p_2)\cdot \mathrm{diag}(\ldots).\] ... It is straightforward to check that this Yang operator fulfills \[Y^{n,m,r}_j(\vec p_{\alpha_j})Y^{n,m,r}_j(\vec p)=1,\] and the modified YBE reads, \[Y^{n,m,r}_j(\vec p_{\alpha_j\alpha_{j+1}})Y^{n,m,r}_{j+1}(\vec p_{\alpha_j})Y^{n,m,r}_j(\vec p)=Y^{n,m,r}_{j+1}(\vec p_{\alpha_{j+1}\alpha_j})Y^{n,m,r}_j(\vec p_{\alpha_{j+1}})Y^{n,m,r}_{j+1}(\vec p).\]"

    The Yang operator is defined as a diagonal matrix in the four-dimensional kinematic-domain basis. Diagonal matrices commute, so the braid relation (7.20) becomes an identity among products of the same three diagonal factors; it holds for any choice of f and S_kappa. Hence the infinite tower of modified Yang-Baxter equations is satisfied by construction and carries no independent dynamical content beyond the diagonal ansatz (7.17).

full rationale

The paper contains real independent content: explicit four-magnon generators are constructed and matched against brute-force diagonalization of closed chains of length 4, 5 and 6 (Section 8), and the authors honestly note non-uniqueness and the approximate L=6 agreement. That external check prevents a score of 8-10. However, the central recursive claim is not derived from the Hamiltonian. Section 5.3 asserts the pole divergence and introduces (5.26) as a plausible asymptotic form; Eq. (5.27) then uses exactly that pole to recover the three-magnon solution. Section 6 begins by 'expecting' the same three-magnon pole structure in (6.6)-(6.7) and fixes all remaining freedom with it, so the four-to-three reduction is an ansatz built into the generating function by construction rather than a consequence of the eigenvalue equations. The short-chain checks do not test this open-infinite pole structure. In addition, the claimed infinite tower of Yang-Baxter equations is vacuous: the Yang operator (7.17) is diagonal, making (7.20) a commuting-product identity. Overall, the central 'prediction' reduces to its input, though the paper contains ancillary non-circular verification, giving a partial circularity score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central computation relies on a long-range ansatz, factorized scattering coefficients, special choices for low-separation corrections, and an assumed smearing pole structure. These are modeling choices rather than consequences of the Hamiltonian, so they must be counted as axioms or free choices. The brute-force checks on short chains provide some independent grounding, but they do not remove the underdetermination of the infinite-chain construction.

free parameters (3)
  • D0,1,0_sigma and D1,0,1_sigma initial conditions = 0 (chosen)
    In Sec. 4.1, the minimum-separation equations are solved 'provided that we fix D0,1,0_ijkl = D1,0,1_ijkl = 0' and the text notes an alternative choice would shift all coefficients. The final eigenvector depends on this hand choice.
  • G(4)_ijkl(0,y,0) = 0 (chosen)
    Eq. (6.1) fixes this single-variable generating function to zero using the freedom left after the special solution; this determines Eqs. (6.2)-(6.3) and subsequently the full four-magnon corrections.
  • Residual generating-function freedom = fixed by smearing ansatz
    Table 1 reports residual freedom of one two-variable and two one-variable generating functions after solving all equations. These are later fixed by imposing the smearing limit, which is an assumption, not a uniqueness theorem.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The XZ-sector nearest-neighbor Hamiltonian (2.6) and one-magnon dispersion (2.15) correctly describe the one-loop planar spectrum.
    Taken from [10,11,21]; all computations assume this Hamiltonian. Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption The Hilbert space is restricted by color contraction rules to alternating Q12/Q21 bifundamental insertions.
    Section 2.1 and the groupoid picture of [26]; this restricts the allowed magnon orderings and kinematic domains in Sec. 7.
  • ad hoc to paper Long-range Bethe ansatz form (3.3)-(3.4): sum over plane waves plus position-dependent corrections.
    Eq. (3.3)-(3.4) is the starting ansatz, not derived from the Hamiltonian. Part I introduced a similar ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper Factorized scattering coefficients (4.1) and partial factorization (4.2).
    Imposed as 'special conditions' in Sec. 4 to obtain a solution; not derived, and the text says the solution is not unique.
  • ad hoc to paper Smearing pole ansatz (5.26): the four-magnon generating function behaves as (1 - e^{ip4}z)^-1 times the three-magnon generating function.
    Assumed in Sec. 5.3 to make the smearing limit produce the three-magnon position corrections; used in Sec. 6 to fix remaining freedom.
  • ad hoc to paper Analyticity of generating functions at the origin, imposed via (3.64) and (3.67).
    Justified as removing spurious poles; it is a constraint choice, and the text notes other scalings and choices exist.
invented entities (2)
  • Unified long-range basis function f(p_sigma; n,m,r,kappa)
    purpose: Claims a novel basis replacing plane waves in Eqs. (9.4)-(9.5) that encodes all position-dependent corrections.
    Defined from the constructed solution (6.36); no independent falsifiable prediction outside the paper is offered.
  • Modified Yang operator Y^{n,m,r}_j
    purpose: Quantifies permutational symmetry and produces an infinite tower of modified Yang-Baxter equations (7.20).
    Constructed from the solution's scattering coefficients and f; the tower is a property of the ansatz, not an independently measured entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-range to the Rescue of Yang-Baxter II." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SL5DWJ2G

@misc{pith2026250708934,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-range to the Rescue of Yang-Baxter II},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SL5DWJ2G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08934}
}
abstract

We study the spin chain model capturing the one-loop spectral problem of the simplest $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal quiver gauge theory in four dimensions, obtained from a marginal deformation of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM. In Part I of this work \cite{Bozkurt:2024tpz}, we solved for the three-magnon eigenvector and found that it exhibits long-range behavior, despite the Hamiltonian being of nearest-neighbor type. In this paper, we extend the analysis to the four-magnon sector and construct explicit eigenvectors. These solutions are compatible with both untwisted and twisted periodic boundary conditions, and they allow for the computation of anomalous dimensions of single-trace operators of the gauge theory. We validate our results by direct comparison with brute-force diagonalization of the spin chain Hamiltonian. Additionally, we uncover a novel structural relation between eigenstates with different numbers of excitations. In particular, we show that the four-magnon eigenstates can be written in terms of the three-magnon solution, revealing a recursive pattern and hinting at a deeper underlying structure. Lastly, the four-magnon solution obeys an infinite tower of Yang-Baxter equations, as was the case for the three-magnon solution.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring the twisted sector of $\mathbb{Z}_{L}$ orbifolds: Matching $\alpha'$-corrections to localisation

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    For generic Z_L orbifolds, naive reduction of the 10d (α')^3 correction fails to match localisation results for twisted half-BPS correlators except at special L values; expanding a twisted Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude r...

  2. Constrained integrability and anyonic chains

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Review of integrable anyonic chains with new examples identified for su(2)_k, Tambara-Yamagami TY(Z_n), Fib x Fib, Fib x Ising, and preliminary results for Haagerup-Izumi categories.

  3. Constrained integrability and anyonic chains

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A modified boost-operator method yields new integrable anyonic chains (including su(2)_k spin-3/2, TY(Z_n), Fib×Fib, Fib×Ising) and a criterion for when Temperley-Lieb algebras appear.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bozkurt, J.M

    D.N. Bozkurt, J.M. Nieto García and E. Pomoni,Long-range to the Rescue of Yang-Baxter, 2408.03365

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview, Lett

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview, Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 3 [1012.3982]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Minahan and K

    J.A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,The Bethe ansatz forN = 4superYang-Mills, JHEP 03 (2003) 013 [hep-th/0212208]

    arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter IV.4: Integrability in QCD and N<4 SYM

    G.P. Korchemsky,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter IV.4: Integrability in QCD andN <4 SYM, Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 425 [1012.4000]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter IV.2: Deformations, Orbifolds and Open Boundaries

    K. Zoubos,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter IV.2: Deformations, Orbifolds and Open Boundaries, Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 375 [1012.3998]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Beisert and R

    N. Beisert and R. Roiban,The Bethe ansatz forZS orbifolds of N = 4super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 11 (2005) 037 [hep-th/0510209]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Kachru and E

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein,4-D conformal theories and strings on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 4855 [hep-th/9802183]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Lawrence, N

    A.E. Lawrence, N. Nekrasov and C. Vafa,On conformal field theories in four-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 533 (1998) 199 [hep-th/9803015]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Pomoni and L. Rastelli,The Veneziano Limit ofN = 2Superconformal QCD: Towards the String Dual ofN = 2SU (Nc) SYM with Nf = 2Nc, 0912.4918

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Pomoni and L. Rastelli,Spin Chains inN=2 Superconformal Theories: From theZ2 Quiver to Superconformal QCD, JHEP 06 (2012) 107 [1006.0015]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Liendo, E

    P. Liendo, E. Pomoni and L. Rastelli,The Complete One-Loop Dilation Operator ofN = 2 SuperConformal QCD, JHEP 07 (2012) 003 [1105.3972]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gadde and L

    A. Gadde and L. Rastelli,Twisted Magnons, JHEP 04 (2012) 053 [1012.2097]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Pomoni and C

    E. Pomoni and C. Sieg,From N=4 gauge theory to N=2 conformal QCD: three-loop mixing of scalar composite operators, 1105.3487

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gadde, P

    A. Gadde, P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and W. Yan,On the Integrability of PlanarN = 2Superconformal Gauge Theories, JHEP 08 (2013) 015 [1211.0271]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Pomoni,Integrability in N = 2superconformal gauge theories, Nucl

    E. Pomoni,Integrability in N = 2superconformal gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 893 (2015) 21 [1310.5709]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Mitev and E

    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni,Exact effective couplings of four dimensional gauge theories withN = 2 supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 125034 [1406.3629]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Mitev and E

    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni,Exact Bremsstrahlung and Effective Couplings, JHEP 06 (2016) 078 [1511.02217]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Niarchos, C

    V. Niarchos, C. Papageorgakis and E. Pomoni,Type-B Anomaly Matching and the 6D (2,0) Theory, JHEP 04 (2020) 048 [1911.05827]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Pomoni,4D N = 2SCFTs and spin chains, J

    E. Pomoni,4D N = 2SCFTs and spin chains, J. Phys. A53 (2020) 283005 [1912.00870]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Niarchos, C

    V. Niarchos, C. Papageorgakis, A. Pini and E. Pomoni,(Mis-)Matching Type-B Anomalies on the Higgs Branch, JHEP 01 (2021) 106 [2009.08375]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Pomoni, R

    E. Pomoni, R. Rabe and K. Zoubos,Dynamical spin chains in 4DN = 2 SCFTs, JHEP 08 (2021) 127 [2106.08449]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Galvagno and M

    F. Galvagno and M. Preti,Chiral correlators inN = 2 superconformal quivers, JHEP 05 (2021) 201 [2012.15792]. – 69 –

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Galvagno and M

    F. Galvagno and M. Preti,Wilson loop correlators inN = 2 superconformal quivers, JHEP 11 (2021) 023 [2105.00257]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gaberdiel and F

    M.R. Gaberdiel and F. Galvagno,Worldsheet dual of freeN = 2 quiver gauge theories, JHEP 10 (2022) 077 [2206.08795]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A. Dei, P. Ferrero and L. Rastelli,On supergravity and noncritical strings, JHEP 01 (2025) 117 [2409.13806]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bertle, E

    H. Bertle, E. Pomoni, X. Zhang and K. Zoubos,Hidden symmetries of 4DN = 2 gauge theories, JHEP 02 (2025) 205 [2411.11612]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    G. Felder,Elliptic quantum groups, in11th International Conference on Mathematical Physics (ICMP-11) (Satellite colloquia: New Problems in the General Theory of Fields and Particles, Paris, France, 25-28 Jul 1994), pp. 211–218, 7, 1994 [hep-th/9412207]

    1994 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Felder and A

    G. Felder and A. Varchenko,Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the elliptic quantum groupEτ,η (sl(2)), Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996) 485 [q-alg/9605024]

    1996 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Felder and M

    G. Felder and M. Ren,Quantum Groups for Restricted SOS Models, SIGMA 17 (2021) 005 [2010.01060]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ren,Baxterization for the dynamical Yang-Baxter equation, 2310.04728

    M. Ren,Baxterization for the dynamical Yang-Baxter equation, 2310.04728

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Konno,Elliptic Quantum Groups, Springer Singapore (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7387-3

    H. Konno,Elliptic Quantum Groups, Springer Singapore (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7387-3

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Inozemtsev,On the spectrum of s= 1/2 xxx heisenberg chain with elliptic exchange, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General28 (1995) L439–L445

    V.I. Inozemtsev,On the spectrum of s= 1/2 xxx heisenberg chain with elliptic exchange, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General28 (1995) L439–L445

    1995

  25. [33]

    Serban,Eigenvectors and scalar products for long range interacting spin chains II: the finite size effects, JHEP 08 (2013) 128 [1302.3350]

    D. Serban,Eigenvectors and scalar products for long range interacting spin chains II: the finite size effects, JHEP 08 (2013) 128 [1302.3350]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Klabbers and J

    R. Klabbers and J. Lamers,How Coordinate Bethe Ansatz Works for Inozemtsev Model, Commun. Math. Phys. 390 (2022) 827 [2009.14513]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Klabbers and J

    R. Klabbers and J. Lamers,Landscapes of integrable long-range spin chains, 2405.09718

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Yang, s matrix for the one-dimensionaln-body problem with repulsive or attractiveδ-function interaction, Phys

    C.N. Yang, s matrix for the one-dimensionaln-body problem with repulsive or attractiveδ-function interaction, Phys. Rev. 168 (1968) 19201923

    1968

  29. [37]

    Bozkurt and E

    D. Bozkurt and E. Pomoni,Work in progress,

  30. [38]

    Arutyunov,Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems, UNITEXT for Physics, Springer International Publishing (2019)

    G. Arutyunov,Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems, UNITEXT for Physics, Springer International Publishing (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Bernard, M

    D. Bernard, M. Gaudin, F.D.M. Haldane and V. Pasquier,Yang-Baxter equation in long range interacting system, J. Phys. A26 (1993) 5219 [hep-th/9301084]

    1993 arXiv

  32. [40]

    de Leeuw, A

    M. de Leeuw, A. Pribytok and P. Ryan,Classifying two-dimensional integrable spin chains, J. Phys. A 52 (2019) 505201 [1904.12005]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, A. Pribytok, A.L. Retore and P. Ryan,Classifying Nearest-Neighbor Interactions and Deformations of AdS, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 031604 [2003.04332]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, A. Pribytok, A.L. Retore and P. Ryan,Yang-Baxter and the Boost: splitting the difference, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 069 [2010.11231]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bozkurt, E

    D. Bozkurt, E. Pomoni and P. Ryan,Work in progress,

  36. [44]

    Corcoran, M

    L. Corcoran, M. de Leeuw and B. Pozsgay,Integrable models on Rydberg atom chains, SciPost Phys. 18 (2025) 139 [2405.15848]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    McLoughlin and A

    T. McLoughlin and A. Spiering,Chaotic spin chains in AdS/CFT, JHEP 09 (2022) 240 [2202.12075]. – 70 –

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Liendo and L

    P. Liendo and L. Rastelli,The Complete One-loop Spin Chain of N =1 SQCD, JHEP 10 (2012) 117 [1111.5290]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Basso, S

    B. Basso, S. Komatsu and P. Vieira,Structure Constants and Integrable Bootstrap in Planar N=4 SYM Theory, 1505.06745

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ferrando, S

    G. Ferrando, S. Komatsu, G. Lefundes and D. Serban,Exact Three-Point Functions inN = 2 Superconformal Field Theories: Integrability vs. Localization, 2503.07295

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    le Plat and T

    D. le Plat and T. Skrzypek,Three-point functions from integrability inN = 2orbifold theories, 2506.21323

  42. [50]

    Skrzypek and A.A

    T. Skrzypek and A.A. Tseytlin,On AdS/CFT duality in the twisted sector of string theory on AdS5 × S5/Z2 orbifold background, JHEP 03 (2024) 045 [2312.13850]. – 71 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.