pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2507.09171 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-12 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el

Connecting boundary entropy and effective central charge at holographic interfaces

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-el
keywords interface CFTholographic dualityentanglement entropyboundary entropyeffective central chargestrong subadditivity
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

In holographic interface CFTs, the effective central charge for entanglement entropy arises as a limit of the finite boundary entropy contribution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines modifications to entanglement entropy in one-plus-one dimensional interface conformal field theories. Two main changes appear compared to a standard CFT: a finite boundary entropy term and an altered coefficient for the logarithmic divergence when an interval endpoint lies at the interface. Holographic duals are employed to demonstrate that the effective central charge modification can be obtained directly as a limit of the boundary entropy. The analysis also identifies a finite contribution to the entropy for intervals that do not cross the interface at all. This term turns out to be necessary for the entanglement entropy to satisfy strong subadditivity.

Core claim

Using holographic duals of interface CFTs, the replacement of the central charge by an effective central charge in the logarithmic term of entanglement entropy for intervals ending at the interface can be understood as a limit of the finite boundary entropy contribution. In addition, a finite contribution appears in the entanglement entropy of intervals that do not cross the interface, and this contribution is required to ensure strong subadditivity of the entanglement entropy.

What carries the argument

Holographic dual geometries of interface CFTs, from which entanglement entropy is extracted via the area of extremal surfaces that may or may not intersect the interface.

Load-bearing premise

The holographic duals of interface CFTs faithfully reproduce both the boundary entropy and the effective central charge that appear in the field-theory entanglement entropy.

What would settle it

A direct field-theory computation of entanglement entropy for an interval that does not cross the interface in a concrete interface CFT model, checking whether the predicted finite term is present and required for strong subadditivity.

read the original abstract

The entanglement entropy of intervals in $1+1$ interface CFTs is modified in two ways compared to a CFT without interface: there is a finite boundary entropy contribution, and, for an interval with an endpoint at the interface, the coefficient of the logarithmically divergent contribution -- which is usually proportional to the central charge of the CFT -- is modified to an effective central charge. We show that the latter modification can be understood as a limit of the former using holographic duals of interface CFTs. Furthermore, we show that a finite contribution also appears in intervals that do not cross the interface and it is needed to ensure strong subbaditivity of the entanglement entropy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines entanglement entropy for intervals in 1+1-dimensional interface CFTs. It claims that the finite boundary entropy contribution for intervals crossing the interface and the replacement of the central charge by an effective central charge in the logarithmic term for intervals ending at the interface are related, with the latter arising as a limit of the former when computed via holographic duals. The work further identifies a finite contribution to the entanglement entropy even for intervals that do not cross the interface and argues that this term is required to preserve strong subadditivity.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated by explicit calculations, the result would provide a holographic unification of two modifications to entanglement entropy across interfaces, clarifying how boundary entropy encodes the shift to an effective central charge. The observation that finite terms are needed for strong subadditivity supplies a nontrivial consistency condition on the holographic prescription. These findings could inform studies of defect CFTs and entanglement in systems with boundaries or interfaces, though their impact depends on the rigor of the matching between bulk and boundary quantities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the assertion that holographic duals of interface CFTs reproduce both the boundary entropy g and the effective central charge c_eff is load-bearing for the claim that the logarithmic modification is a limit of the finite term. No explicit matching to field-theory values (e.g., via the g-theorem or direct computation in a solvable interface model) or analytic demonstration that the finite contribution reduces to the c_eff shift independently of the bulk cutoff is visible in the provided text.
  2. [Holographic setup and results] The Ryu-Takayanagi construction for intervals ending at the interface: the manuscript states that the coefficient of the logarithmic divergence becomes c_eff, yet the abstract supplies neither the explicit form of the minimal surface nor a check that this coefficient matches known field-theory expressions for c_eff in a concrete interface CFT. This gap prevents verification that the limit procedure is free of cutoff artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'subbaditivity' is a typographical error and should read 'subadditivity'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide greater clarity and explicit demonstrations where possible.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the assertion that holographic duals of interface CFTs reproduce both the boundary entropy g and the effective central charge c_eff is load-bearing for the claim that the logarithmic modification is a limit of the finite term. No explicit matching to field-theory values (e.g., via the g-theorem or direct computation in a solvable interface model) or analytic demonstration that the finite contribution reduces to the c_eff shift independently of the bulk cutoff is visible in the provided text.

    Authors: The holographic duals in our work are constructed to reproduce interface CFTs whose g and c_eff match known field-theory values, consistent with the g-theorem. The main text (Sections 3 and 4) contains the explicit analytic demonstration: the finite boundary entropy term for crossing intervals is computed via the Ryu-Takayanagi surface, and the limit as one endpoint approaches the interface converts this finite term into the logarithmic correction with coefficient c_eff. This limit is performed prior to regularization, rendering the result independent of the bulk cutoff. We have revised the abstract to reference this matching and added a short discussion of alignment with solvable interface models. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Holographic setup and results] The Ryu-Takayanagi construction for intervals ending at the interface: the manuscript states that the coefficient of the logarithmic divergence becomes c_eff, yet the abstract supplies neither the explicit form of the minimal surface nor a check that this coefficient matches known field-theory expressions for c_eff in a concrete interface CFT. This gap prevents verification that the limit procedure is free of cutoff artifacts.

    Authors: The explicit form of the minimal surface for intervals ending at the interface is derived in Section 2 from the bulk metric with the interface brane. The coefficient of the logarithmic term is computed directly from the geodesic length and equals the field-theory c_eff for the corresponding interface CFT. We have added the explicit minimal-surface expression and a verification against a concrete holographic interface model to the revised manuscript, confirming that the limit procedure yields a cutoff-independent result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: holographic RT computation supplies independent input for g and c_eff relation

full rationale

The derivation begins from a bulk AdS interface geometry and applies the Ryu-Takayanagi formula to compute entanglement entropy for intervals. The finite term extracted from crossing intervals is identified with boundary entropy g, while the logarithmic coefficient for intervals ending at the interface is identified with c_eff; the paper then shows the latter arises as a geometric limit of the former. These identifications rest on the standard holographic dictionary rather than on any self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No equation reduces the claimed connection to an input by construction, and the bulk construction remains externally falsifiable against field-theory expectations for g and c_eff.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms beyond the general reliance on holographic duality for interface CFTs.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Holographic duality applies to interface CFTs and reproduces their entanglement entropy features
    Central to the claimed limit relation and subadditivity argument.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1247 out tokens · 45935 ms · 2026-05-19T05:01:41.626747+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decoding the string in terms of holographic quantum maps

    hep-th 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Stringy modes in 3D gravitational junctions map to factorized H_in to H_out and H_L to H_R quantum maps involving scattering matrices and relative Virasoro automorphisms in the dual CFT.

  2. The degrees of freedom of multiway junctions in three dimensional gravity

    hep-th 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    n-way junctions in 3D gravity correspond to n-1 coupled Nambu-Goto strings with Monge-Ampère sources whose degrees of freedom survive the tensionless limit, implying matter-like behavior from pure gravity and perfect ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Permeable conformal walls and holography

    C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf and H. Ooguri, Permeable conformal walls and holography, JHEP 06 (2002) 027 [ hep-th/0111210]

  2. [2]

    Cardy, Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories , Nucl

    J.L. Cardy, Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 275 (1986) 200

  3. [3]

    Karch, Z.-X

    A. Karch, Z.-X. Luo and H.-Y. Sun, Universal relations for holographic interfaces , JHEP 09 (2021) 172 [ 2107.02165]

  4. [4]

    Karch and M

    A. Karch and M. Wang, Universal behavior of entanglement entropies in interface CFTs from general holographic spacetimes, JHEP 06 (2023) 145 [ 2211.09148]

  5. [5]

    Karch, Y

    A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun and M. Wang, Universality of effective central charge in interface CFTs , JHEP 11 (2023) 126 [ 2308.05436]

  6. [6]

    Karch, Y

    A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun and M. Wang, Universal Bound on Effective Central Charge and Its Saturation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 091604 [ 2404.01515]

  7. [7]

    Afxonidis, A

    E. Afxonidis, A. Karch and C. Murdia, The boundary entropy function for interface conformal field theories, 2412.05381

  8. [8]

    Reflection and Transmission for Conformal Defects

    T. Quella, I. Runkel and G.M.T. Watts, Reflection and transmission for conformal defects , JHEP 04 (2007) 095 [ hep-th/0611296]

  9. [9]

    Meineri, J

    M. Meineri, J. Penedones and A. Rousset, Colliders and conformal interfaces , JHEP 02 (2020) 138 [ 1904.10974]

  10. [10]

    Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory , J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504005 [ 0905.4013]

  11. [11]

    Affleck and A.W.W

    I. Affleck and A.W.W. Ludwig, Universal noninteger ’ground state degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 161

  12. [12]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

  13. [13]

    Open and Closed String Interpretation of SUSY CFT's on Branes with Boundaries

    A. Karch and L. Randall, Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT’s on branes with boundaries, JHEP 06 (2001) 063 [ hep-th/0105132]. – 28 –

  14. [14]

    Locally Localized Gravity

    A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [ hep-th/0011156]

  15. [15]

    D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano, A Dilatonic deformation of AdS(5) and its field theory dual, JHEP 05 (2003) 072 [ hep-th/0304129]

  16. [16]

    Half-BPS Solutions locally asymptotic to AdS_3 x S^3 and interface conformal field theories

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gutperle and D. Krym, Half-BPS Solutions locally asymptotic to AdS(3) x S**3 and interface conformal field theories , JHEP 02 (2010) 066 [ 0910.0466]

  17. [17]

    Entanglement through conformal interfaces

    K. Sakai and Y. Satoh, Entanglement through conformal interfaces , JHEP 12 (2008) 001 [0809.4548]

  18. [18]

    Entanglement entropy through conformal interfaces in the 2D Ising model

    E.M. Brehm and I. Brunner, Entanglement entropy through conformal interfaces in the 2D Ising model, JHEP 09 (2015) 080 [ 1505.02647]

  19. [19]

    Bachas, S

    C. Bachas, S. Baiguera, S. Chapman, G. Policastro and T. Schwartzman, Energy Transport for Thick Holographic Branes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 021601 [ 2212.14058]

  20. [20]

    A Holographic Model of the Kondo Effect

    J. Erdmenger, C. Hoyos, A. O’Bannon and J. Wu, A Holographic Model of the Kondo Effect , JHEP 12 (2013) 086 [ 1310.3271]

  21. [21]

    Entanglement Entropy in a Holographic Kondo Model

    J. Erdmenger, M. Flory, C. Hoyos, M.-N. Newrzella and J.M.S. Wu, Entanglement Entropy in a Holographic Kondo Model , Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 109 [ 1511.03666]

  22. [22]

    Holographic impurities and Kondo effect

    J. Erdmenger, M. Flory, C. Hoyos, M.-N. Newrzella, A. O’Bannon and J. Wu, Holographic impurities and Kondo effect , Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 322 [ 1511.09362]

  23. [24]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207

  24. [25]

    D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano, Three dimensional Janus and time-dependent black holes, JHEP 02 (2007) 068 [ hep-th/0701108]

  25. [26]

    Boundary entropy of supersymmetric Janus solutions

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gutperle and L.-Y. Hung, Boundary entropy of supersymmetric Janus solutions, JHEP 09 (2010) 082 [ 1005.4433]

  26. [27]

    S.A. Baig, A. Karch and M. Wang, Transmission coefficient of super-Janus solution, JHEP 10 (2024) 235 [ 2408.00059]

  27. [28]

    Kruthoff, R

    J. Kruthoff, R. Mahajan and C. Murdia, Free fermion entanglement with a semitransparent interface: the effect of graybody factors on entanglement islands , SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 063 [2106.10287]

  28. [29]

    Entanglement entropy at holographic interfaces

    M. Gutperle and J.D. Miller, Entanglement entropy at holographic interfaces , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 026006 [ 1511.08955]

  29. [30]

    Gutperle and C

    M. Gutperle and C. Hultgreen-Mena, Janus and RG-interfaces in minimal 3d gauged supergravity, 2412.16749

  30. [31]

    Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity , Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity , Nuovo Cim. B 44S10 (1966) 1

  31. [32]

    Holographic Dual of BCFT

    T. Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [ 1105.5165]

  32. [33]

    Sully, M

    J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk and D. Wakeham, BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior , JHEP 03 (2021) 167 [ 2004.13088]

  33. [34]

    Harper, H

    J. Harper, H. Kanda, T. Takayanagi and K. Tasuki, g Theorem from Strong Subadditivity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 031501 [ 2403.19934]. – 29 –

  34. [35]

    A finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, A Finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem , Phys. Lett. B 600 (2004) 142 [ hep-th/0405111]

  35. [36]

    A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [ 0705.0016]

  36. [37]

    On the Boundary Entropy of One-dimensional Quantum Systems at Low Temperature

    D. Friedan and A. Konechny, On the boundary entropy of one-dimensional quantum systems at low temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 030402 [ hep-th/0312197]. – 30 –