Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Enhancement of dark-photon haloscope sensitivity with degenerate modes: toward axion-level form factor and polarization determination

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Coherently summing signals from three degenerate, orthogonally polarized cavity modes makes the dark-photon form factor equal to the axion form factor regardless of the unknown polarization direction, and lets the power ratios at the…

desk verdict Degenerate-mode sum recovers axion-level form factor for symmetric cavities; the cylindrical case is numerically plausible but the analytic derivation has a gap, and the 'maximum/most effective' claims overreach. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.09265 v1 pith:TESCLTRS submitted 2025-07-12 hep-ph hep-ex

Jose R. Navarro-Madrid , José Reina-Valero , Alejandro Díaz-Morcillo , Benito Gimeno This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords darkphotonhaloscopeformfactordegeneratemodespolarizationdeterminationmicrowavecavityaxionmattercoherentsignalsummation
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to remove the main penalty of dark-photon haloscope searches: the unknown polarization direction of the dark photon, which typically reduces the form factor to either $\cos^2\theta \approx 0.0025$ (fixed polarization) or $1/3$ (random polarization) of the axion value. Its proposal is to use a cavity with three resonant modes that are degenerate in frequency and whose electric fields point along three orthogonal directions, and to coherently add the signals from the three ports. The paper claims this coherent sum yields the full axion form factor $C_a$ no matter which way the dark-photon polarization points, and that the individual port powers encode the polarization angles $\theta$ and $\varphi$. It supports the claim with a network-theory derivation and with full-wave simulations of cubic, spherical, and cylindrical cavities, including realistic tuning elements, and it quantifies the resulting sensitivity and integration-time gains.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a three-port microwave network model of the haloscope. The dark photon acts as a time-harmonic current source whose phase is identical in every port, and the detector is characterized by a $3\times 3$ admittance matrix linking port voltages to currents. The decisive identity is $C_{\mathrm{DP}x}+C_{\mathrm{DP}y}+C_{\mathrm{DP}z}=C_a$, which holds when the modes are degenerate, orthogonal, and share the same spatial profile so each carries the same axion form factor to its Cartesian axis; the squared cosines of the polarization direction then sum to $1$. The derivation also identifies the two conditions that make the coherent summation valid, small off-diagonal admittance elements and equal diagonal elements, and packages their failure into a single error factor $\gamma$ that enters the reported uncertainties.

What would settle it

Build or simulate the natural-degeneracy cylindrical cavity (radius 110 mm, length 223.69 mm) with three orthogonal ports and rotate the polarization of a calibrated drive over the full sphere; if the ratio of the coherently summed power to the power expected from a single mode with form factor $C_a$ deviates from 1 by more than the quoted $\gamma+\Lambda$ for any direction, the identity $C_T=C_a$ fails for that geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that dark-photon detection does not have to accept a polarization penalty: in a symmetric reciprocal cavity whose three degenerate modes couple to Cartesian $x$, $y$, and $z$, the coherent total power contains $C_a$ exactly, because the directional form factors partition unity, $C_{\mathrm{DP}x}+C_{\mathrm{DP}y}+C_{\mathrm{DP}z}=C_a(\sin^2\theta\cos^2\varphi+\sin^2\theta\sin^2\varphi+\cos^2\theta)$. The derivation shows the dark-photon source generates in-phase currents in the three ports, so with equal diagonal and negligible off-diagonal admittance elements the three signals add constructively and the sum of squared coupling integrals becomes $1$. The authors verify this numerically for four cavities, finding maximum total form factors of $0.67$ (cubic), $0.72$ (spherical), and $0.69$--$0.67$ (cylindrical), with direction-dependence irregularity from $0.002\%$ to $5.6\%$, and they demonstrate that the polarization angles can be reconstructed from the power ratios $P_{w3}/P_T$ and $P_{w2}/P_{w1}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the three degenerate modes have identical spatial profiles, so each one couples with the same axion form factor $C_a$ along its Cartesian axis; this is exact for cubic and spherical cavities by symmetry, but for the cylindrical cavity the TE111 and TM010 modes have different field distributions, so the analytic identity $C_T=C_a$ is only verified numerically there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the fixed-polarization scenario ($\cos^2\theta = 0.0025$), the sensitivity at fixed integration time improves by a factor of about 20, and the integration time needed for a fixed sensitivity drops by a factor of about $1.6\times 10^5$.
  • For the random-polarization scenario ($\langle\cos^2\theta\rangle = 1/3$), the corresponding gains are about a factor $1.7$ in sensitivity and a factor $9$ in integration time.
  • If a signal is detected and the polarization is stable over the integration, the angles of $\hat{n}$ follow from the individual port powers: $\theta = \arccos\sqrt{P_{w3}/P_T}$ and $\varphi = \arctan\sqrt{P_{w2}/P_{w1}}$.
  • Because the method works in cylindrical cavities, an axion haloscope with a suitable tuning system can search for axions and dark photons simultaneously without giving up the axion-level form factor; the numerically demonstrated total form factors range from $0.67$ to $0.72$ depending on geometry and tuning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same three-port readout is a polarimeter: if $\hat{n}$ is fixed in the galactic frame, the Earth's rotation should modulate the per-port powers on a daily timescale, and the reconstructed angles should track that rotation.
  • The same coherent-sum test could screen other geometries: any symmetric cavity whose three degenerate modes have equal $C_a$ values and near-identical spatial profiles should yield $C_T \approx C_a$, so the identity can be checked numerically before fabrication.
  • A direct calibration protocol follows from the error analysis: inject a known-polarization tone and compare the measured three-port power ratios to the reconstructed-angle formulas to measure $\gamma$ for the actual manufactured cavity, which would test the method's assumptions without waiting for dark matter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a microwave-cavity haloscope scheme for detecting dark-photon dark matter using three degenerate, mutually orthogonal resonant modes whose individual signals are coherently summed. The central claims are (i) that the summed dark-photon form factor equals the axion form factor, CT = Ca, independent of the unknown polarization direction, and (ii) that the polarization direction can be reconstructed from the ratio of powers extracted at the three ports. The derivation uses the BI-RME modal method to express the detected power in terms of the three mode form factors, and the claims are supported by CST simulations of cubic, spherical, and two cylindrical cavities, including geometries with tuning elements. The paper also quantifies the error in the coherent summation arising from asymmetries in the admittance matrix and reports sensitivity and integration-time improvements relative to conventional single-mode dark-photon searches.

Significance. If the central identity CT = Ca holds for realistic cavities, the proposal would solve a recognized problem in dark-photon haloscopes: the suppression of the signal due to the unknown polarization direction. The idea of using three degenerate orthogonal modes is not new (it appears in Ref. [5]), but this paper provides a systematic modal derivation, detailed cavity designs, and explicit numerical form-factor maps for cubic, spherical, and cylindrical geometries. The inclusion of tuning elements and the error analysis are valuable practical contributions. The strongest part is the exact algebraic result for high-symmetry cavities (cube, sphere), where the identity follows from rotational symmetry. The paper also makes a useful connection to simultaneous axion and dark-photon searches. However, the central claim is not fully established for the cylindrical geometry, which is the most relevant for existing haloscope experiments, because the analytic derivation relies on assumptions that are only numerically verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eqs. (24a)-(24c)] The derivation of the sum rule CDPx + CDPy + CDPz = Ca assumes that the three degenerate modes have identical spatial profiles, so that each mode has the same maximum coupling Ca to its respective Cartesian direction. This is exact for cubic and spherical cavities by rotational symmetry, but it is not true for the cylindrical cavity, where TE111-x/y and TM010 have different field distributions. The analytic derivation therefore does not prove CT = Ca for the cylinder; it only proves CT = gx nx^2 + gy ny^2 + gz nz^2 with generally unequal coefficients gx, gy, gz. The numerical results in Table I show max(CT)=0.69 for the untuned cylinder and 0.67 for the tuned cylinder, but the paper never states the conventional axion form factor for the TM010 mode (4/x01^2 ≈ 0.69) nor the individual per-mode maxima, so the reader cannot judge whether the equality is exact or merely close. This is a load-bearing point because the abstract and conclusions claim that the axion-level form factor is achieved in all three geometries. The authors should either (a) prove the equality of the per-mode form factors for the cylinder using the explicit field expressions, or (b) revise the claim to state that the sum is approximately equal to Ca for the cylinder and provide a quantitative bound on the deviation.
  2. [Sec. III.A, Eq. (23)] The step from Eq. (22) to Eq. (23) assumes that the port-coupling integrals F1^(μ) are equal for all three ports and that each port couples only to the one resonant mode that is nominally aligned with it. For the cylindrical cavity, the magnetic field of TM010 at a z-oriented coaxial port is azimuthal and differs in magnitude from the magnetic fields of TE111-x and TE111-y at the x- and y-oriented ports, so F1 is not automatically equal. The manuscript does not report the computed F1 values for any of the cavities, nor does it justify the truncation of the mode sum to a single mode per port. This assumption is necessary for the network derivation to yield the simple power sum in Eq. (25), and without it the error parameter γ in Sec. V.C only accounts for admittance-matrix asymmetries, not for unequal port couplings. The authors should present the F1 values from the simulations or an analytic argument for their equality, and if they are unequal, incorporate them into the final form-factor expression.
  3. [Sec. V.B, Eq. (34)] The polarization-reconstruction formulas θ = arccos(sqrt(Pw3/PT)) and φ = arctan(sqrt(Pw2/Pw1)) assume that the power in each port is directly proportional to the squared projection of the dark-photon polarization onto the corresponding Cartesian axis, i.e., that the three modes have equal form-factor coefficients and equal port couplings. For the cylindrical cavity, where these assumptions fail, the reconstructed angles would be biased, and the bias is not quantified. The text should explicitly state that Eq. (34) is exact only for high-symmetry cavities (cube, sphere) and give the corrected reconstruction formulas for the general case, or otherwise restrict the polarization-determination claim to those geometries.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase "an haloscope" should be "a haloscope", and "significative" should be "significant" in the Introduction.
  2. [Sec. II] The notation "cos 2(θ)" in the text after Eq. (6) should be "cos^2(θ)" to match the equation; the current typesetting is ambiguous.
  3. [Sec. IV.B] The two cylindrical cavities are described in a way that is easy to confuse: one has length 224.5 mm and requires tuning elements, and the other has length 223.69 mm and matches the three mode frequencies naturally. Assigning distinct labels (e.g., 'cylinder A' and 'cylinder B') would improve readability.
  4. [Table I] Table I quotes max(CT) values to two decimal places but does not compare them with the conventional axion form factor Ca = 4/x01^2 ≈ 0.69 for the TM010 mode. Adding a column with the relevant Ca for each geometry would make the central claim directly testable.
  5. [Sec. V.B] The statement that "the exact same form factor maps were obtained for the cubic and spherical geometries" is surprising given their different symmetry groups; clarify whether this means the maps are identical after relabeling of the modes or only that the same qualitative patterns appear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sum rule follows from orthogonality and equal per-mode form factors; the cylindrical case is checked by independent full-wave simulation. A minor self-citation to the BI-RME method is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained in structure. Equation (23) follows from the BI-RME modal expansion and expresses the total output power as a sum over the three modes of |\int E_mu . n dV|^2. Equation (24) then parametrizes each per-mode dark-photon form factor as Ca times the appropriate direction cosine squared; substituting into Eq. (23) gives Eq. (25) by the trigonometric identity sin^2 theta cos^2 phi + sin^2 theta sin^2 phi + cos^2 theta = 1. This is an algebraic consequence, not a fit, and it does not rename a fitted parameter as a prediction. For cubic and spherical cavities, the assumption that the three modes have identical spatial profiles with the same maximum coupling Ca follows from symmetry. For the cylindrical cavity, equal per-mode form factors for TE111-x/y and TM010 are not automatic, so the analytic chain in Section III.A is conditional. However, the paper does not rest the cylindrical claim on that chain alone: Section V.B and Table I report CST full-wave form-factor maps computed from the actual electric fields of the tuned and untuned cylinders. Those simulations are independent checks, not outputs of Eq. (24), and they show near-isotropy (Lambda = 1.24%-5.6%) and maximum total form factors of 0.67-0.69, approximating the axion-level form factor. Whether that approximation is exact is a correctness/accuracy issue, not circularity. The BI-RME method is cited to Refs. [23-25], including the authors' prior work [25], but the method is a standard, documented modal technique used to set up Eq. (7); no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' earlier papers to force CT = Ca. The polarization reconstruction in Eq. (34) simply inverts the same power-ratio relations and is not obtained by fitting. Overall, one minor self-citation appears, but it is not load-bearing, and the core result has independent numerical support.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted numbers. The load-bearing assumptions are the orthogonality and equal-form-factor property of the three modes, the uniformity of the DP current, and the near-symmetric admittance matrix of the designed cavities. These are stated or numerically verified in the paper. The design parameters such as cavity dimensions and tuning depths are engineering choices, not free parameters that the physics claim is fitted against.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The three degenerate modes have orthonormal electric fields and identical form-factor magnitude C_a.
    Used in Eq. (24) to write C_DPx/y/z in terms of a single C_a. Exactly true for cubic and spherical cavities by rotational symmetry; for the cylindrical cavity it is an approximation later verified numerically in Section V.B.
  • domain assumption The DP-induced equivalent current density is spatially uniform and coherent across the cavity, with constant polarization n.
    Standard assumption for wavelike dark photon dark matter; used in Eq. (20) to set J_DP and in Eqs. (23)-(25) to factor the coupling integrals.
  • domain assumption The cavity's admittance matrix satisfies conditions (i) off-diagonal elements negligible and (ii) equal diagonal elements.
    Used in Section III.B to extract |Z_alpha|^2 as a common factor in Eq. (22). The authors state these conditions are fulfilled for a completely symmetric and reciprocal cavity; for real cavities with tuning they are approximate, which is the basis of the error term gamma.
  • domain assumption BI-RME 3D modal expansion correctly describes coupling between an internal current source and the output ports of a lossy cavity.
    Adopted from references [23-25]; the paper's derivation of the port currents and the equivalent network in Section III.A rests on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancement of dark-photon haloscope sensitivity with degenerate modes: toward axion-level form factor and polarization determination." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TESCLTRS

@misc{pith2026250709265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancement of dark-photon haloscope sensitivity with degenerate modes: toward axion-level form factor and polarization determination},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TESCLTRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.09265}
}
read the original abstract

The dark photon has been postulated as a potential constituent of dark matter, exhibiting notable similarities to the axion. The primary distinction between the two particles lies in the nature of their respective fields: the dark photon field is a vector field with a polarization direction that remains undetermined. This work explores the prospect of utilizing three degenerate modes for scanning the three dimensions of space in order to mitigate the low form factor expected in the detection of the dark photon due to their unknown polarization. The employment of an haloscope with three orthogonal and degenerate modes in conjunction with the coherent sum of signals is demonstrated in this work in order to enhance the dark photon form factor up to the axion form factor, and to determine the direction of the dark photon polarization vector. We show in this manuscript that the maximum form factor is achieved in cavities of cubic, spherical, and cylindrical geometries, considering the introduction of tuning elements. To achieve this adequately, some conditions reviewed in this article must be fulfilled in the resonant cavity, leading to uncertainties in the final measurement. Finally, this technique can allow the simultaneous search for dark matter axions and dark photons, and to the knowledge of the authors, the method shown in this work is the most effective one for detecting dark photon with microwave resonant cavities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.09265 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Equivalent network representing the DP decay inside [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. 3D model of the spherical cavity for simulations with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. 3D model of the cylindrical cavity with the coaxial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Reflection coefficients of the three modes for the cubic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Form factor calculations for each mode ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cavity Multimodes as an Array for High-Frequency Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 9-cell microwave cavity's 18 modes can act as a synthetic detector array that reconstructs the direction, polarization, and chirp of a high-frequency gravitational-wave signal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [5]

    Caputo, A

    A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, Dark photon limits: A handbook, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095029 (2021)

    2021

  2. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [2]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  4. [3]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  5. [4]

    E. G. M. Fabbrichesi and G. Lanfranchi, The Physics of the Dark Photon (Springer Cham, 2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    B. M. Brubaker, L. Zhong, Y. V. Gurevich, S. B. Cahn, S. K. Lamoreaux, M. Simanovskaia, J. R. Root, S. M. Lewis, S. Al Kenany, K. M. Backes, I. Urdinaran, N. M. Rapidis, T. M. Shokair, K. A. van Bibber, D. A. Palken, M. Malnou, W. F. Kindel, M. A. Anil, K. W. Lehnert, and G. Carosi, First Results from a Microwave Cavity Axion Search at 24 µeV, Phys. Rev. ...

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    O. Kwon, D. Lee, W. Chung, D. Ahn, H. Byun, F. Caspers, H. Choi, J. Choi, Y. Chong, H. Jeong, J. Jeong, J. E. Kim, J. Kim, i. m. c. b. u. Kutlu, J. Lee, M. Lee, S. Lee, A. Matlashov, S. Oh, S. Park, S. Uchaikin, S. Youn, and Y. K. Semertzidis, First Results from an 13 Axion Haloscope at CAPP around 10.7 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 191802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Ahyoune et al

    S. Ahyoune et al. , RADES axion search results with a high-temperature superconducting cavity in an 11.7 T magnet, Journal of High Energy Physics 2025, 113 (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    All equations in this article are expressed in SI units un- less otherwise specified

  2. [10]

    Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    1983

  3. [11]

    invisible

    P. Sikivie, Detection rates for “invisible”-axion searches, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2988 (1985)

    1985

  4. [12]

    O’Hare, cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, https:// cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/ (2020)

    C. O’Hare, cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, https:// cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/ (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Navarro, B

    P. Navarro, B. Gimeno, J. Monz´ o-Cabrera, A. D ´ ıaz- Morcillo, and D. Blas, Study of a cubic cavity resonator for gravitational waves detection in the microwave fre- quency range, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104048 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Reina-Valero, J

    J. Reina-Valero, J. R. Navarro-Madrid, D. Blas, A. D ´ ıaz- Morcillo, I. G. Irastorza, B. Gimeno, and J. Monz´ o- Cabrera, High-frequency gravitational waves detection with the BabyIAXO haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043024 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Arias, D

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Re- dondo, and A. Ringwald, WISPy cold dark matter, Jour- nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (06), 013–013

    2012

  8. [16]

    Diaz-Morcillo, J

    A. Diaz-Morcillo, J. Garc ´ ıa Barcel´ o, A. Lozano-Guerrero, et al., Design of New Resonant Haloscopes in the Search for the Dark Matter Axion: A Review of the First Steps in the RADES Collaboration, Universe 8, 5 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    In this case, the DP polarization remains constant with respect to the galactic reference frame, but one should take into account that the laboratory reference frame is movable, thus varying the DP polarization as well, de- pending on the periodic movement of the reference frame

  10. [18]

    Bajjali, S

    F. Bajjali, S. Dornbusch, M. Ekmedˇ zi´ c, D. Horns, C. Kasemann, A. Lobanov, A. Mkrtchyan, L. H. Nguyen, M. Tluczykont, G. Tuccari, J. Ulrichs, G. Wieching, and A. Zensus, First results from brass-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter, Journal of Cosmology and As...

    2023

  11. [19]

    H. An, S. Ge, W.-Q. Guo, X. Huang, J. Liu, and Z. Lu, Direct detection of dark photon dark matter using radio telescopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181001 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    L. H. Nguyen, A. Lobanov, and D. Horns, First results from the wispdmx radio frequency cavity searches for hidden photon dark matter, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10), 014

    2019

  13. [21]

    Cervantes, J

    R. Cervantes, J. Aumentado, C. Braggio, B. Giaccone, D. Frolov, A. Grassellino, R. Harnik, F. Lecocq, O. Mel- nychuk, R. Pilipenko, S. Posen, and A. Romanenko, Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark mat- ter with superconducting radio frequency cavities, Phys. Rev. D...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Adachi, R

    S. Adachi, R. Fujinaka, Y. Muto, H. Nakata, Y. Sueno, T. Sumida, J. Suzuki, O. Tajima, H. Takeuchi, and S. Honda (DOSUE-RR Collaboration), Search for dark photon dark matter in the mass range 41−74 µeV using millimeter-wave receiver and radioshielding box, Phys. Rev. D 109, 01...

    2024

  15. [23]

    R. S. Giuseppe Conciauro, Marco Guglielmi, Advanced Modal Analysis (Wiley, 1999)

    1999

  16. [24]

    Arcioni, M

    P. Arcioni, M. Bozzi, M. Bressan, G. Conciauro, and L. Perregrini, The BI-RME method: An historical overview, in 2014 International Conference on Numer- ical Electromagnetic Modeling and Optimization for RF, Microwave, and Terahertz Applications (NEMO) (2014) pp. 1–4

    2014

  17. [25]

    Navarro, B

    P. Navarro, B. Gimeno, A. ´Alvarez Melc´ on, S. A. Cuendis, C. Cogollos, A. D ´ ıaz-Morcillo, J. Gallego, J. G. Barcel´ o, J. Golm, I. Irastorza, A. L. Guerrero, and C. P. Garay, Wide-band full-wave electromagnetic modal anal- ysis of the coupling between dark-matter axions an...

    2022

  18. [27]

    However, this method is intended for the simultaneous search for DPs and axions, where a magnet is needed

    No magnet is needed for DP detection. However, this method is intended for the simultaneous search for DPs and axions, where a magnet is needed

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.