pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.09663 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

A Surface-confined Spiral State With the Double Period in the Cubic Chiral Helimagnet Cu₂OSeO₃

Priya R. Baral , Oleg I. Utesov , Samuel H. Moody , Matthew T. Littlehales , Pierluigi Gargiani , Manuel Valvidares , Robert Cubitt , Nina-Juliane Steinke
show 5 more authors
Chen Luo Florin Radu Arnaud Magrez Jonathan S. White Victor Ukleev
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords surface-confined spiralchiral helimagnetCu2OSeO3resonant elastic x-ray scatteringdouble periodmagnetic phasessurface anisotropy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resonant x-ray scattering uncovers a surface-confined spiral with double the usual pitch in Cu2OSeO3.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the discovery of a new magnetic spiral state that exists only at the surface of the chiral magnet Cu2OSeO3. This state has a pitch length of about 120 nanometers, twice as long as the spirals seen in the bulk of the same material. It appears at low temperatures when the applied magnetic field is tilted slightly away from certain crystal directions. The authors use resonant elastic x-ray scattering in different geometries to show the state is localized to the surface and suggest it arises from special interactions that occur only at the crystal boundary. If correct, this shows how surfaces can stabilize distinct spin patterns not found inside the material.

Core claim

Using resonant elastic x-ray scattering, the authors identify a surface-confined spiral state in Cu2OSeO3 with a real-space pitch of approximately 120 nm. This is twice the length of previously observed incommensurate magnetic structures in this compound. The state appears below 30 K for magnetic fields applied 3 to 18 degrees away from the <110> axes. Its confinement to the surface is established by comparing reflection and transmission REXS geometries along with small-angle neutron scattering data that show no bulk signal. The stabilization is attributed to competing anisotropic interactions present at the crystal surface.

What carries the argument

The surface-confined spiral state (SSS), a magnetic structure with double the bulk period, detected via resonant elastic x-ray scattering and localized by geometry comparisons.

If this is right

  • This state is absent from the bulk of the crystal.
  • The double-period spiral is stabilized by surface-specific anisotropic interactions.
  • Such surface states could enable engineering of nanoscale spin textures for devices.
  • The phase emerges only in a specific range of field orientations and temperatures below 30 K.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This finding implies that crystal surfaces in chiral magnets can host magnetic phases with longer periods than the bulk due to broken symmetry.
  • Similar surface effects might be engineered in other helimagnets to create stable nanoscale magnetic textures for information storage.
  • Further studies could test if the double period relates to specific surface reconstructions or strain effects.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the observed differences in resonant x-ray scattering between surface-sensitive reflection and bulk-sensitive transmission geometries, together with neutron scattering, prove the spiral exists only at the surface and not in the bulk at all.

What would settle it

Detection of the 120 nm pitch spiral signal using a bulk-sensitive technique such as small-angle neutron scattering or in the transmission geometry of x-ray scattering would indicate the state is not confined to the surface.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.09663 by Arnaud Magrez, Chen Luo, Florin Radu, Jonathan S. White, Manuel Valvidares, Matthew T. Littlehales, Nina-Juliane Steinke, Oleg I. Utesov, Pierluigi Gargiani, Priya R. Baral, Robert Cubitt, Samuel H. Moody, Victor Ukleev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The chiral magnetoelectric insulator Cu$_2$OSeO$_3$ hosts a rich and anisotropic magnetic phase diagram that includes helical, conical, field-polarised, tilted conical, and skyrmion lattice phases. Using resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS), we uncover a new spiral state confined to the surface of Cu$_2$OSeO$_3$. This surface-confined spiral state (SSS) displays a real-space pitch of $\sim$120 nm, which remarkably is twice the length of the incommensurate structures observed to-date in Cu$_2$OSeO$_3$. The SSS phase emerges at temperatures below 30~K when the magnetic field is applied between $3^\circ$ to $18^\circ$ away from the $\langle\text{110}\rangle$ crystallographic axes. Its surface localisation is demonstrated through a combination of REXS in reflection and transmission geometries, with complementary small-angle neutron scattering measurements suggesting its absence from the bulk. We attribute the stabilisation of the SSS to competing anisotropic interactions at the crystal surface. The discovery of a robust, surface-confined spiral paves the way for engineering energy-efficient, nanoscale spin-texture platforms for next-generation devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental discovery, via resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS), of a new surface-confined spiral state (SSS) in the chiral magnet Cu₂OSeO₃. This state exhibits a real-space pitch of ∼120 nm (twice the bulk incommensurate period), appears below 30 K for applied fields oriented 3°–18° from ⟨110⟩ axes, and is argued to be strictly localized to the surface on the basis of its presence in REXS reflection geometry, its absence in REXS transmission geometry, and the lack of corresponding scattering in small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). The stabilization is attributed to surface-specific anisotropic interactions.

Significance. If the surface confinement and double-period character are robustly demonstrated, the result would be of clear interest to the chiral-magnetism community. It would illustrate how surface boundary conditions can select magnetic textures absent from the bulk, with potential implications for nanoscale spintronic or magnetoelectric devices. The multi-geometry REXS plus SANS approach supplies independent cross-checks that strengthen the observational character of the work.

major comments (1)
  1. [REXS reflection/transmission comparison and SANS results] The central claim that the SSS is strictly surface-confined (and absent from the bulk) is load-bearing for the headline result. However, the manuscript provides no explicit calculation of the x-ray penetration depth or absorption length at the Cu L-edge, nor any estimate of the minimum detectable bulk volume fraction in transmission geometry or SANS. A weakly ordered or low-density bulk component could therefore remain below the detection threshold, weakening the attribution to surface-only anisotropic interactions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental section] The abstract and main text would benefit from a concise statement of the data-reduction procedures, background subtraction, and error estimation used for the REXS and SANS intensities.
  2. [Discussion of surface sensitivity] Quantitative modeling of the expected surface versus bulk scattering contrast (e.g., via penetration-depth estimates or simulated rocking curves) is absent and would strengthen the localization argument.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the significance of our findings. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative details that strengthen the evidence for surface confinement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the SSS is strictly surface-confined (and absent from the bulk) is load-bearing for the headline result. However, the manuscript provides no explicit calculation of the x-ray penetration depth or absorption length at the Cu L-edge, nor any estimate of the minimum detectable bulk volume fraction in transmission geometry or SANS. A weakly ordered or low-density bulk component could therefore remain below the detection threshold, weakening the attribution to surface-only anisotropic interactions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit calculation of the x-ray penetration depth would further bolster the surface-confinement argument. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph (new Section 3.3) that computes the absorption length at the Cu L3 edge using tabulated atomic scattering factors and the mass density of Cu2OSeO3, yielding ~45 nm. This implies that reflection-geometry REXS probes only the top ~90 nm. For transmission geometry we estimate, based on our measured signal-to-noise ratio and counting statistics, that a bulk-ordered volume fraction exceeding ~4 % would produce a detectable peak; no such peak is observed. For SANS we note that the technique integrates over the full sample thickness (~0.5 mm) with sensitivity to magnetic scattering cross-sections down to ~0.1 % of the helical Bragg intensity; the absence of the 120 nm period peak is therefore meaningful. These quantitative estimates are now included with references to the relevant cross-section formulas, reinforcing that the double-period state is localized to the surface. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational experimental report with independent geometric checks

full rationale

This manuscript reports direct experimental observations of a new spiral state via resonant elastic x-ray scattering in reflection and transmission geometries plus complementary SANS. No derivations, theoretical models, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text or abstract. Surface localization is argued from the presence/absence of signals across independent measurement geometries rather than from any equation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The central claims therefore remain self-contained against external benchmarks and receive a score of zero.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental discovery paper; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new postulated entities are introduced in the abstract. The stabilization mechanism is attributed to generic surface anisotropic interactions without a specific model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5814 in / 1168 out tokens · 41239 ms · 2026-05-19T04:55:32.777598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and topologically-nontrivial skyrmions [6–9] promote emergent electromagnetic phenomena that can be crucial for developing the next-generation dissipationless electron- ics [10]. Chiral cubic magnets provide the fertile ground to nucleate various twisted spin textures due to the com- petition among Heisenberg exchange interaction, antisym- metric Dzyalosh...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Interestingly, the new phase emerges in the same temperature range where exotic tilted conical and disordered skyrmion phases are stable [67]

    The narrow phase region indicates a balance of inter- actions: restricted magnetic field range, specific angles of the required magnetic field application, and lower temper- atures required to stabilize this phase, compared to helical or conical phases. Interestingly, the new phase emerges in the same temperature range where exotic tilted conical and diso...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Y okouchi, F

    T. Y okouchi, F . Kagawa, M. Hirschberger, Y . Otani, N. Na- gaosa, and Y . Tokura, Emergent electromagnetic induction in a helical-spin magnet, Nature586, 232 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Kitaori, N

    A. Kitaori, N. Kanazawa, T. Y okouchi, F . Kagawa, N. Na- gaosa, and Y . Tokura, Emergent electromagnetic induc- tion beyond room temperature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2105422118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Kitaori, J

    A. Kitaori, J. S. White, N. Kanazawa, V. Ukleev, D. Singh, Y . Furukawa, T.-h. Arima, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Dop- ing control of magnetism and emergent electromagnetic in- duction in high-temperature helimagnets, Physical Review B 107, 024406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Togawa, Y

    Y . Togawa, Y . Kousaka, S. Nishihara, K. Inoue, J. Akimitsu, A. Ovchinnikov, and J.-i. Kishine, Interlayer magnetoresis- tance due to chiral soliton lattice formation in hexagonal chi- ral magnet CrNb 3S6, Physical Review Letters111, 197204 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Kanazawa, Y

    N. Kanazawa, Y . Onose, T. Arima, D. Okuyama, K. Ohoyama, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, S. Ishiwata, and Y . Tokura, Large topological hall effect in a short-period helimagnet MnGe, Physical Review Letters106, 156603 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Bogdanov and A

    A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Thermodynamically stable mag- netic vortex states in magnetic crystals, Journal of Mag- netism and Magnetic Materials138, 255 (1994)

    work page 1994

  9. [9]

    Mühlbauer, B

    S. Mühlbauer, B. Binz, F . Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P . Böni, Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet, Science323, 915 (2009)

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: ad- vances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    A. K. Nayak, V. Kumar, T. Ma, P . Werner, E. Pippel, R. Sahoo, F . Damay, U. K. Rößler, C. Felser, and S. S. Parkin, Magnetic antiskyrmions above room temperature in tetragonal heusler materials, Nature548, 561 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Tokura, M

    Y . Tokura, M. Kawasaki, and N. Nagaosa, Emergent func- tions of quantum materials, Nature Physics13, 1056 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Bak and M

    P . Bak and M. H. Jensen, Theory of helical magnetic struc- tures and phase transitions in MnSi and FeGe, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13, L881 (1980)

    work page 1980

  14. [14]

    Nakanishi, A

    O. Nakanishi, A. Y anase, A. Hasegawa, and M. Kataoka, The origin of the helical spin density wave in MnSi, Solid State Communications35, 995 (1980)

    work page 1980

  15. [15]

    S. V. Maleyev, Cubic magnets with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya in- teraction at low temperature, Physical Review B73, 174402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Lebech, J

    B. Lebech, J. Bernhard, and T. Freltoft, Magnetic structures of cubic fege studied by small-angle neutron scattering, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter1, 6105 (1989)

    work page 1989

  17. [17]

    S. Seki, X. Yu, S. Ishiwata, and Y . Tokura, Observation of skyrmions in a multiferroic material, Science336, 198 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Nakajima, H

    T. Nakajima, H. Oike, A. Kikkawa, E. P . Gilbert, N. Booth, K. Kakurai, Y . Taguchi, Y . Tokura, F . Kagawa, and T.-h. Arima, Skyrmion lattice structural transition in MnSi, Science Ad- vances3, e1602562 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Karube, J

    K. Karube, J. White, V. Ukleev, C. Dewhurst, R. Cu- bitt, A. Kikkawa, Y . Tokunaga, H. Rønnow, Y . Tokura, and Y . Taguchi, Metastable skyrmion lattices governed by mag- netic disorder and anisotropy inβ-Mn-type chiral magnets, Physical Review B102, 064408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Takagi, Y

    R. Takagi, Y . Y amasaki, T. Y okouchi, V. Ukleev, Y . Y okoyama, H. Nakao, T. Arima, Y . Tokura, and S. Seki, Particle-size de- pendent structural transformation of skyrmion lattice, Nature Communications11, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Chacon, L

    A. Chacon, L. Heinen, M. Halder, A. Bauer, W. Simeth, S. Mühlbauer, H. Berger, M. Garst, A. Rosch, and C. Pflei- derer, Observation of two independent skyrmion phases in a chiral magnetic material, Nature Physics14, 936 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Karube, J

    K. Karube, J. S. White, D. Morikawa, C. D. Dewhurst, R. Cu- bitt, A. Kikkawa, X. Yu, Y . Tokunaga, T.-h. Arima, H. M. Røn- now,et al., Disordered skyrmion phase stabilized by mag- netic frustration in a chiral magnet, Science Advances4, eaar7043 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    L. J. Bannenberg, H. Wilhelm, R. Cubitt, A. Labh, M. P . Schmidt, E. Lelièvre-Berna, C. Pappas, M. Mostovoy, and A. O. Leonov, Multiple low-temperature skyrmionic states in a bulk chiral magnet, npj Quantum Materials4, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Okamura, Y

    Y . Okamura, Y . Y amasaki, D. Morikawa, T. Honda, V. Uk- leev, H. Nakao, Y . Murakami, K. Shibata, F . Kagawa, S. Seki, et al., Emergence and magnetic-field variation of chiral- soliton lattice and skyrmion lattice in the strained helimagnet Cu2OSeO3, Physical Review B96, 174417 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Nakajima, V

    T. Nakajima, V. Ukleev, K. Ohishi, H. Oike, F . Kagawa, S.- i. Seki, K. Kakurai, Y . Tokura, and T.-h. Arima, Uniaxial- stress effects on helimagnetic orders and skyrmion lattice in Cu2OSeO3, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan87, 094709 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Ukleev, Y

    V. Ukleev, Y . Y amasaki, O. Utesov, K. Shibata, N. Kanazawa, N. Jaouen, H. Nakao, Y . Tokura, and T.-h. Arima, Metastable solitonic states in the strained itinerant helimagnet FeGe, Physical Review B102, 014416 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Morikawa, X

    D. Morikawa, X. Yu, K. Karube, Y . Tokunaga, Y . Taguchi, T.-h. Arima, and Y . Tokura, Deformation of topologically- protected supercooled skyrmions in a thin plate of chiral magnet Co8Zn8Mn4, Nano Letters17, 1637 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Nagase, M

    T. Nagase, M. Komatsu, Y . So, T. Ishida, H. Y oshida, Y . Kawaguchi, Y . Tanaka, K. Saitoh, N. Ikarashi, M. Kuwa- hara,et al., Smectic liquid-crystalline structure of skyrmions in chiral magnet Co8.5Zn7.5Mn4 (110) thin film, Physical Re- view Letters123, 137203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Aqeel, J

    A. Aqeel, J. Sahliger, T. Taniguchi, S. Mändl, D. Mettus, H. Berger, A. Bauer, M. Garst, C. Pfleiderer, and C. H. Back, Microwave spectroscopy of the low-temperature skyrmion state in Cu 2OSeO3, Physical Review Letters126, 017202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    X. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y . Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Zhang, S. Ishi- wata, Y . Matsui, and Y . Tokura, Near room-temperature for- mation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet FeGe, Nature Materials10, 106 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    X. Zhao, C. Jin, C. Wang, H. Du, J. Zang, M. Tian, R. Che, and Y . Zhang, Direct imaging of magnetic field-driven transi- tions of skyrmion cluster states in FeGe nanodisks, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 4918 (2016). 7

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Jin, Z.-A

    C. Jin, Z.-A. Li, A. Kovács, J. Caron, F . Zheng, F . N. Rybakov, N. S. Kiselev, H. Du, S. Blügel, M. Tian,et al., Control of mor- phology and formation of highly geometrically confined mag- netic skyrmions, Nature Communications8, 15569 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    S. A. Pathak and R. Hertel, Geometrically constrained skyrmions, Magnetochemistry7, 26 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Niitsu, Y

    K. Niitsu, Y . Liu, A. C. Booth, X. Yu, N. Mathur, M. J. Stolt, D. Shindo, S. Jin, J. Zang, N. Nagaosa,et al., Geometrically stabilized skyrmionic vortex in FeGe tetrahedral nanoparti- cles, Nature Materials21, 305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    P . R. Baral, V. Ukleev, T. LaGrange, R. Cubitt, I. Živkovi ´c, H. M. Rønnow, J. S. White, and A. Magrez, Tuning topological spin textures in size-tailored chiral magnet insulator particles, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    F . N. Rybakov, A. B. Borisov, S. Blügel, and N. S. Kiselev, New type of stable particlelike states in chiral magnets, Phys- ical Review Letters115, 117201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    F . N. Rybakov, A. B. Borisov, S. Blügel, and N. S. Kiselev, New spiral state and skyrmion lattice in 3D model of chiral magnets, New Journal of Physics18, 045002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Zhang, G

    S. Zhang, G. van der Laan, J. Müller, L. Heinen, M. Garst, A. Bauer, H. Berger, C. Pfleiderer, and T. Hesjedal, Recipro- cal space tomography of 3D skyrmion lattice order in a chiral magnet, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 6386 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Zheng, F

    F . Zheng, F . N. Rybakov, A. B. Borisov, D. Song, S. Wang, Z.-A. Li, H. Du, N. S. Kiselev, J. Caron, A. Kovács,et al., Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in B20- type FeGe, Nature Nanotechnology13, 451 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Zhang, G

    S. Zhang, G. Van Der Laan, W. Wang, A. Haghighirad, and T. Hesjedal, Direct observation of twisted surface skyrmions in bulk crystals, Physical Review Letters120, 227202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Zhang, D

    S. Zhang, D. M. Burn, N. Jaouen, J.-Y . Chauleau, A. A. Haghighirad, Y . Liu, W. Wang, G. van der Laan, and T. Hes- jedal, Robust perpendicular skyrmions and their surface con- finement, Nano Letters20, 1428 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    D. Burn, R. Brearton, K. Ran, S. Zhang, G. van der Laan, and T. Hesjedal, Periodically modulated skyrmion strings in Cu2OSeO3, npj Quantum Materials6, 73 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Turnbull, M

    L. Turnbull, M. Littlehales, M. Wilson, M. Birch, H. Popescu, N. Jaouen, J. Verezhak, G. Balakrishnan, and P . Hatton, X- ray holographic imaging of magnetic surface spirals in FeGe lamellae, Physical Review B106, 064422 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    X. Xie, K. Ran, Y . Liu, R. Fan, W. Tan, H. Jin, M. Valvidares, N. Jaouen, H. Du, G. van der Laan,et al., Observation of the skyrmion side-face state in a chiral magnet, Physical Review B107, L060405 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    H. Jin, W. Tan, Y . Liu, K. Ran, R. Fan, Y . Shangguan, Y . Guang, G. van der Laan, T. Hesjedal, J. Wen,et al., Evolu- tion of emergent monopoles into magnetic skyrmion strings, Nano Letters (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    F . Qian, L. J. Bannenberg, H. Wilhelm, G. Chaboussant, L. M. Debeer-Schmitt, M. P . Schmidt, A. Aqeel, T. T. Palstra, E. Brück, A. J. Lefering,et al., New magnetic phase of the chiral skyrmion material Cu 2OSeO3, Science Advances4, eaat7323 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    A. O. Leonov, C. Pappas, and I. Kézsmárki, Field and anisotropy driven transformations of spin spirals in cu- bic skyrmion hosts, Physical Review Research2, 043386 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Moody, P

    S. Moody, P . Nielsen, M. Wilson, D. A. Venero, A. Šte- fanˇciˇc, G. Balakrishnan, and P . Hatton, Experimental evi- dence of a change of exchange anisotropy sign with tem- perature in Zn-substituted Cu 2OSeO3, Physical Review Re- search3, 043149 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    A. O. Leonov and C. Pappas, Reorientation processes of tilted skyrmion and spiral states in a bulk cubic helimagnet Cu2OSeO3, Frontiers in Physics11, 1105784 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    P . R. Baral, O. I. Utesov, C. Luo, F . Radu, A. Magrez, J. S. White, and V. Ukleev, Direct observation of exchange anisotropy in the helimagnetic insulator Cu2OSeO3, Physical Review Research5, L032019 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Marchiori, G

    E. Marchiori, G. Romagnoli, L. Schneider, B. Gross, P . Sa- hafi, A. Jordan, R. Budakian, P . R. Baral, A. Magrez, J. S. White,et al., Imaging magnetic spiral phases, skyrmion clus- ters, and skyrmion displacements at the surface of bulk Cu2OSeO3, Communications Materials5, 202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Mehboodi, V

    S. Mehboodi, V. Ukleev, C. Luo, R. Abrudan, F . Radu, C. Back, and A. Aqeel, Observation of distorted tilted coni- cal phase at the surface of a bulk chiral magnet with reso- nant elastic x-ray scattering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15882 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Halder, A

    M. Halder, A. Chacon, A. Bauer, W. Simeth, S. Mühlbauer, H. Berger, L. Heinen, M. Garst, A. Rosch, and C. Pfleiderer, Thermodynamic evidence of a second skyrmion lattice phase and tilted conical phase in Cu2OSeO3, Physical Review B98, 144429 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Langner, S

    M. Langner, S. Roy, S. Mishra, J. Lee, X. Shi, M. Hossain, Y .-D. Chuang, S. Seki, Y . Tokura, S. Kevan,et al., Coupled skyrmion sublattices in Cu 2OSeO3, Physical Review Letters 112, 167202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Zhang, G

    S. Zhang, G. van der Laan, and T. Hesjedal, Direct experi- mental determination of spiral spin structures via the dichro- ism extinction effect in resonant elastic soft x-ray scattering, Physical Review B96, 094401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Ukleev, C

    V. Ukleev, C. Luo, R. Abrudan, A. Aqeel, C. Back, and F . Radu, Chiral surface spin textures in Cu2OSeO3 unveiled by soft x-ray scattering in specular reflection geometry, Sci- ence and Technology of Advanced Materials23, 682 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Kishine and A

    J.-i. Kishine and A. Ovchinnikov, Theory of monoaxial chiral helimagnet, Solid State Physics66, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Hellwig, G

    O. Hellwig, G. Denbeaux, J. Kortright, and E. E. Fullerton, X-ray studies of aligned magnetic stripe domains in perpen- dicular multilayers, Physica B: Condensed Matter336, 136 (2003)

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    Stellhorn, A

    A. Stellhorn, A. Sarkar, E. Kentzinger, M. Waschk, P . Schöff- mann, S. Schröder, G. Abuladze, Z. Fu, V. Pipich, and T. Brückel, Control of the stripe domain pattern in L10- ordered FePd thin films, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials476, 483 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Milde, L

    P . Milde, L. Köhler, E. Neuber, P . Ritzinger, M. Garst, A. Bauer, C. Pfleiderer, H. Berger, and L. M. Eng, Field- induced reorientation of helimagnetic order in Cu 2OSeO3 probed by magnetic force microscopy, Physical Review B 102, 024426 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Ukleev, O

    V. Ukleev, O. Utesov, L. Yu, C. Luo, K. Chen, F . Radu, Y . Y a- masaki, N. Kanazawa, Y . Tokura, T.-h. Arima,et al., Signa- ture of anisotropic exchange interaction revealed by vector- field control of the helical order in a FeGe thin plate, Physical Review Research3, 013094 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    S. K. Karna, M. Marshall, W. Xie, L. DeBeer-Schmitt, D. P . Y oung, I. Vekhter, W. A. Shelton, A. Kovács, M. Charilaou, and J. F . DiTusa, Annihilation and control of chiral domain walls with magnetic fields, Nano Letters21, 1205 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    S. A. Osorio, V. Laliena, J. Campo, and S. Bustingorry, Chiral helimagnetism and stability of magnetic textures in MnNb3S6, Physical Review B108, 054414 (2023). 8

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Moriya and T

    T. Moriya and T. Miyadai, Evidence for the helical spin structure due to antisymmetric exchange interaction in Cr1/3NbS2, Solid State Communications42, 209 (1982)

    work page 1982

  65. [65]

    Brearton, S

    R. Brearton, S. Moody, L. Turnbull, P . Hatton, A. Štefan ˇciˇc, G. Balakrishnan, G. van der Laan, and T. Hesjedal, Obser- vation of the chiral soliton lattice above room temperature, Advanced Physics Research2, 2200116 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Fedorov, A

    V. Fedorov, A. Gukasov, V. Kozlov, S. Maleyev, V. Plakhty, and I. Zobkalo, Interaction between the spin chirality and the elastic torsion, Physics Letters A224, 372 (1997)

    work page 1997

  67. [67]

    Tarnavich, E

    V. Tarnavich, E. Tartakovskaya, Y . Chetverikov, V. Golub, D. Lott, Y . Chernenkov, A. Devishvili, V. Ukleev, V. Kapak- lis, A. Oleshkevych,et al., Magnetic field induced chirality in Ho/Y multilayers with gradually decreasing anisotropy, Phys- ical Review B96, 014415 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Laliena, S

    V. Laliena, S. A. Osorio, D. Bazo, S. Bustingorry, and J. Campo, Continuum of metastable conical states of monoaxial chiral helimagnets, Physical Review B108, 024425 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Crisanti, A

    M. Crisanti, A. Leonov, R. Cubitt, A. Labh, H. Wilhelm, M. P . Schmidt, and C. Pappas, Tilted spirals and low- temperature skyrmions in Cu 2OSeO3, Physical Review Re- search5, 033033 (2023)

    work page 2023