Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 99 references

Epicyclic oscillations and accretion disk around a special Buchdahl-inspired spacetime

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a static Buchdahl-inspired vacuum metric fits the 3:2 QPO pairs of two microquasars and predicts a monotonic brightening of their accretion disks as $\tilde{k}$ grows.

desk verdict Competent application of standard QPO/disk machinery to a newer metric, undermined by a union-versus-intersection slip in the headline parameter range that revision should fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10198 v1 pith:IQ4PJQU2 submitted 2025-07-14 gr-qc

Mirzabek Alloqulov , Mubasher Jamil , Sanjar Shaymatov , Qiang Wu , Mustapha Azreg-Aïnou This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s97.80.Jp98.62.Mw
keywords specialBuchdahl-inspiredspacetimequasi-periodicoscillationsepicyclicfrequenciesinnermoststablecircularorbitthinaccretiondiskmicroquasarsR^2gravityraytracing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests the special Buchdahl-inspired spacetime, a static, spherically symmetric vacuum solution of pure $R^2$ gravity that reduces to Schwarzschild when its parameter $\tilde{k}$ vanishes, against observations of accreting black hole candidates. It derives circular geodesics and the innermost stable circular orbit, then uses the metric's epicyclic oscillation frequencies to fit the 3:2 high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillation pairs observed in two galactic microquasars. The fit selects $0.03<\tilde{k}<0.19$, with positive $\tilde{k}$ moving the ISCO inward relative to Schwarzschild and raising the disk's flux, temperature, differential luminosity, and radiative efficiency. If correct, the metric offers a non-rotating alternative to the standard spinning-black-hole description of the innermost accretion flow, and its single parameter becomes testable by the disk image's inner hollow region.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the special Buchdahl-inspired metric (2), with $f(x)=1-2/((1+\tilde{k})x)$, whose ISCO is located numerically through the effective-potential conditions $\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=0$ and $\partial_{rr}V_{\rm eff}=0$. The epicyclic frequencies $\nu_r$ and $\nu_\theta$ from Eqs. (15)-(16) are combined in the forced-resonance model $\nu_U=\nu_\theta+\nu_r$, $\nu_L=\nu_\theta$, and matching these expressions to the two microquasars' measured peaks and mass error bands fixes the allowed $\tilde{k}$ interval. The disk analysis uses the geometrically thin, optically thick accretion disk model with inner edge at the ISCO, the flux integral of Eq. (23), and backward-in-time geodesic ray tracing with a power-law source profile to produce redshifted images and intensities.

What would settle it

Measure the spin of XTE J1550-564 independently through broad iron-line or continuum-fitting analysis, then compare the resulting ISCO radius with the value metric (2) predicts at the QPO-fitted $\tilde{k}$ and published mass; agreement within combined uncertainties would support the claim, while a statistically significant mismatch would exclude the static Buchdahl description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the special Buchdahl-inspired metric (2), carrying one higher-derivative parameter $\tilde{k}$, reproduces the observed 3:2 upper-lower HF QPO ratios of XTE J1550-564 and GRO J1655-40 under a forced-resonance model while predicting a definite monotonic response of ISCO radius, disk radiation, and image morphology. For XTE J1550-564 the model curves intersect the mass error band for $0.03 \leq \tilde{k} \leq 0.13$; for GRO J1655-40 the same procedure gives $0.13 \leq \tilde{k} \leq 0.19$, beyond the upper limit obtained from M87* shadow modeling. The authors therefore conclude $0.03<\tilde{k}<0.19$ and emphasize that rotation is dropped because no analytic rotating version of the metric is available. Positive $\tilde{k}$ decreases $r_{\rm ISCO}$ below $6M$, increases $L_{\rm ISCO}$, lowers $E_{\rm ISCO}$, and raises the radiative efficiency.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes both microquasars can be modeled as non-rotating, spherically symmetric objects described by its central metric, and their actual spin is dropped from the fit; if they rotate appreciably, the ISCO, QPO frequencies, and disk emission all differ, and the inferred $\tilde{k}$ range would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Positive $\tilde{k}$ shrinks the ISCO below the Schwarzschild value, so the same accretion rate produces a disk whose inner edge is closer to the central object and whose ray-traced image has a smaller hollow region.
  • The forced-resonance fit restricts the parameter to $0.03<\tilde{k}<0.19$ for the two microquasars, a range that future QPO observations with tighter mass and spin measurements can confirm or exclude.
  • Disk flux, temperature, differential luminosity, and radiative efficiency all increase with $\tilde{k}$, so a source at fixed mass and accretion rate would appear brighter in this spacetime than in Schwarzschild.
  • The ray-traced images closely resemble Schwarzschild but with a significantly altered inner hollow region and a strongly concentrated intensity pattern, giving a concrete imaging signature for the metric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The static approximation likely biases the inferred $\tilde{k}$ band for real microquasars; if an analytic rotating Buchdahl-inspired metric becomes available, the best-fit interval may shift, so the quoted range should be read as the non-spinning geometry's prediction.
  • Because both the QPO frequencies and the disk luminosity trace the ISCO, measuring continuum or iron-line flux together with QPO peaks in the same source could break degeneracies between $\tilde{k}$ and spin that separate fits cannot.
  • The predicted size of the disk's inner hollow region is a direct target for next-generation high-resolution black hole imaging, since the brightness profile itself is not strongly altered.
  • The paper's $\tilde{k}$ range could be checked against independent probes of the same metric, such as stellar orbits around the Galactic center, without waiting for a rotating solution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes test-particle geodesics, ISCO properties, epicyclic frequencies, HF QPO constraints, and thin accretion-disk radiation for the special Buchdahl-inspired metric (2). It reports that the Buchdahl parameter k~ shifts the ISCO inward for positive values, derives expressions for the radial and vertical epicyclic frequencies, fits the 3:2 HF QPOs of XTE J1550-564 and GRO J1655-40 to obtain an allowed range for k~, and computes disk flux, temperature, luminosity, and ray-traced images as functions of k~. The central quantitative claim is that the QPO data require 0.03<k~<0.19.

Significance. If the QPO constraint were valid, the paper would provide a new observational test of the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime using two well-known microquasars, complementing earlier constraints from S2-star and EHT shadow analyses. The paper also contains useful numerical results: the ISCO table (Table I), the monotonic dependence of ISCO radius and radiative efficiency on k~, and the ray-traced disk images are internally consistent and reproducible from the stated formalism. However, the headline QPO range is not supported by the reported numbers because the two source-specific intervals are combined as a union rather than a joint intersection; this undermines the main new observational claim. The disk and ray-tracing sections are standard applications and are not affected by this error.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, after Eq. (21), Figs. 5 and 6] The paper's concluding constraint 0.03<k~<0.19 is obtained by joining the interval 0.03≤k~≤0.13 from XTE J1550-564 and the interval 0.13≤k~≤0.19 from GRO J1655-40. Since k~ is a single parameter of the spacetime, the claim that metric (2) reproduces the 3:2 HF QPOs of both sources requires the intersection of the two allowed sets, which is only the endpoint k~=0.13 (or empty under strict inequalities). The union interval contains values for which at least one microquasar is not fitted, so the stated range does not follow from the figures. The authors should perform a joint fit or otherwise report the intersection and its uncertainty.
  2. [Sec. III, Figs. 5 and 6 and surrounding text] The QPO fitting procedure is purely graphical: the text states that intersections of the ν_U and ν_L curves with the mass-error band occur for certain k~ ranges, but it does not specify how the frequency uncertainties (e.g., ±3 Hz and ±5 Hz in Eq. (20)) are propagated, nor does it provide a goodness-of-fit or confidence level. A quantitative parameter estimation, even a simple chi-square or likelihood over k~ using both sources simultaneously, is needed to support the claimed constraint.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (17), and conclusion] The central inference assumes that XTE J1550-564 and GRO J1655-40 are static, spherically symmetric objects described by metric (2), and the authors explicitly drop the rotation parameter in Eq. (20). Given that both sources are known to have substantial spin, the inferred k~ range is potentially biased. The authors acknowledge this limitation in the text, but because the QPO constraint is the main novel result, the abstract and conclusions should state that the range is valid only under the static approximation, or the analysis should be extended to a rotating metric.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (17)] The relation 2r_g = (1+k~)r_s is taken from Ref. [18] without derivation; a brief explanation or an explicit reference to the mass definition would help readers understand how the Buchdahl parameter enters the observed mass.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (24)] The symbol E is used for both the specific energy of a test particle (Eq. (9)) and the photon energy kT in Eq. (24); please use a distinct symbol for the photon energy to avoid confusion.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption reads 'for different values of the angular momentum and Buchdahl parameters' but the text says L and E are the specific angular momentum and energy; please clarify which parameters vary in each panel.
  4. [References] Reference [40] in the bibliography is formatted as ' [40] [40] G. Mustafa, ...', with a duplicated bracket; please correct the citation list.
  5. [Sec. IV, text before Eq. (24)] The phrase 'referred to as the differential luminosity' should read 'referred to as the differential luminosity' without the preceding comma; also, the sentence beginning 'We can see from this figure' appears to refer to the right panel of Fig. 8, which is not explicitly labeled.
  6. [Sec. III, Eqs. (18)–(19)] The paper sets c=G=M=1 earlier, but Eqs. (18) and (19) reintroduce c and G; please state explicitly that these equations are written in physical units or define the conversion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QPO and accretion-disk results are ordinary parameter-constraint calculations from an imported metric, not inputs disguised as outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central computations are self-contained applications of standard formulas to the special Buchdahl-inspired metric (2). The epicyclic frequencies (18)-(19) are obtained by substituting the metric into the general spherical-symmetric formulas (15)-(16); the QPO analysis then fits the free parameter k to external observational data for XTE J1550-564 (Eq. 20) and GRO J1655-40 using the forced-resonance model (21) from Ref. [72]. This is parameter estimation against external data, not a derivation that defines the observed frequencies in terms of k by construction. The accretion-disk section likewise computes ISCO parameters, flux, temperature, and luminosity from the metric and the Novikov-Thorne model, with no fitted output being relabeled as a prediction. The relation 2r_g = (1+k)r_s is imported from Ref. [18], which overlaps with some authors, but it is a published metric-parameter identification and does not by itself make the QPO constraint equivalent to its input; it merely sets the conversion between Schwarzschild radius and mass. The paper explicitly acknowledges limitations such as neglecting rotation and the moderate accuracy of the constraints, and the GRO J1655-40 fit is described as less satisfactory; these are correctness and modeling concerns, not circularity. The apparent union-of-intervals issue in the reported QPO constraint is a logical-consistency problem that could weaken the stated conclusion, but it is not a case of a derived quantity reducing to its own input by definition or self-citation. No circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central results rest on the imported Buchdahl-inspired metric and a small number of modeling choices: the mass-parameter mapping, the resonance model, and the standard thin-disk assumptions. No new particles or fields are introduced. The main free parameter is \tilde{k}, constrained by QPO data, plus two unspecified emission-profile parameters in the ray-tracing section.

free parameters (3)
  • Buchdahl parameter \tilde{k} = 0.03 < \tilde{k} < 0.19 (union); joint fit gives \tilde{k} ≈ 0.13
    Free parameter of the special Buchdahl-inspired metric (2); constrained by fitting the HF QPOs of XTE J1550-564 and GRO J1655-40 in Sec. III.
  • radial intensity slope n
    Power-law index in the ray-tracing emission profile (Eq. 30); value not specified in the paper, yet it shapes the image intensity in Fig. 10.
  • photon index \Gamma
    Photon index in the ray-tracing emission profile (Eq. 30); value not specified, so the ray-traced intensity is not fully determined.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Metric (2) with rho(r) from (3) is an asymptotically flat vacuum solution of pure R^2 gravity.
    Imported from Nguyen [15] and used in Sec. II without re-derivation; the paper does not verify that it solves the field equations (1).
  • domain assumption The ADM mass M of the spacetime is related to the metric parameter r_s by 2r_g = (1+\tilde{k})r_s.
    Stated in Sec. III before Eq. (17), cited to [18]. This mapping determines the physical mass used in the frequency formulas; a different mapping would shift all QPO curves.
  • domain assumption The observed HF QPOs arise from the forced-resonance model \nu_U=\nu_\theta+\nu_r and \nu_L=\nu_\theta.
    Adopted in Sec. III around Eq. (21), following Stuchlík and Kološ [72]; alternative resonance models would give different \tilde{k} constraints.
  • domain assumption The Novikov-Thorne thin accretion disk with inner edge at the ISCO applies to the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime for the full range of \tilde{k} considered.
    Assumed in Sec. IV; for \tilde{k}\neq0 the central object may be a wormhole or naked singularity, geometries for which the standard disk model's existence of stable circular orbits down to ISCO is not established.
  • standard math Test-particle motion is confined to the equatorial plane θ=π/2 and oscillations are small perturbations about circular orbits.
    Standard assumption in Sec. II-III; the linearized epicyclic equations (15)-(16) rely on this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Epicyclic oscillations and accretion disk around a special Buchdahl-inspired spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IQ4PJQU2

@misc{pith2026250710198,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Epicyclic oscillations and accretion disk around a special Buchdahl-inspired spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IQ4PJQU2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10198}
}
abstract

In this paper, we consider the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime metric and investigate its aspects using the quasiperiodic oscillations and the accretion disk due to the accreting matter. First, we focus on analyzing the geodesics of particles around the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime, together with the conserved quantities such as specific energy and angular momentum for massive particles orbiting on the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCOs). We show that the effect of the Buchdahl parameter $\tilde{k}$ increases as the radii of the ISCO orbits decrease, resulting in shifting orbits toward the central object compared to the Schwarzschild black hole case. We also consider astrophysical epicyclic oscillations and derive their general expressions using implications of circular motion of massive particles around the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime. Further, we explore the astrophysical implications of observational higher-frequency QPOs of the selected galactic microquasars of X-ray binary systems to obtain the best-fit constraints on the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime parameters. Finally, we consider the accretion disk around the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime using implications of the ISCO parameters that define the accretion disk's inner edge. We explore radiation properties of the accretion disk and redshifted image and intensity of a lensed accretion disk around the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10198 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Radial dependence of effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Radial dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dependence of ISCO radius from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The trajectories of the test particles in the vicinity of the Buchdahl-inspired spacetime for different values of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Curve fit to the data of the XTE J1550-564 galactic microquasar; see Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Curve fit to the data of the GRO J1655-40 galactic microquasar with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The differential luminosity profile of the accretion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Radial dependence of the flux of electromagnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Radial dependence of the temperature of the accre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Redshifted image (left panel) and intensity (right panel) of a lensed accretion disk around Buchdahl-inspired spacetimes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L4 (2019), arXiv:1906.11241 [astro- ph.GA]. 9

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, arXiv:2311.08680 (2023), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Bambi, Rev

    C. Bambi, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025001 (2017), arXiv:1509.03884 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    I. H. Stairs, Living Rev. Rel.6, 5 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0307536

    arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Ishak, Living Rev

    M. Ishak, Living Rev. Rel.22, 1 (2019), arXiv:1806.10122 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Lewandowski, Y

    J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, J. Yang, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101501 (2023), arXiv:2210.02253 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Theory and phenomenology of a four dimensional string-corrected black hole

    K. Jusufi and D. Stojkovic, Universe 8, 194 (2022), arXiv:2203.10957 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    F. M. Mele, J. M¨ unch, and S. Pateloudis, JCAP 02, 011 (2022), arXiv:2102.04788 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Ferraro, AIP Conf

    R. Ferraro, AIP Conf. Proc.1471, 103 (2012), arXiv:1204.6273 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Pravda, A

    V. Pravda, A. Pravdova, and G. Turner, (2024), arXiv:2406.05908 [gr-qc]

    2024

  4. [12]

    H. A. Buchdahl, Il Nuovo Cimento 23, 141 (1962)

    1962

  5. [13]

    H. K. Nguyen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32, 2342007 (2023), arXiv:2305.08163 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    H. K. Nguyen, Phys. Rev. D106, 104004 (2022), arXiv:2211.01769 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    H. K. Nguyen, Phys. Rev. D107, 104008 (2023), arXiv:2211.03542 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    H. K. Nguyen and M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 626 (2023), arXiv:2305.04321 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Azreg-A ¨ ınou and H

    M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou and H. K. Nguyen, Phys. Scripta98, 125025 (2023), arXiv:2304.08456 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Maryam, M

    S. Maryam, M. Jamil, Azreg-A ¨ ınou, and Z. C. S. Chan, Annals of Physics473, 169911 (2025), arXiv:2412.20745 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [20]

    J.-M. Yan, T. Zhu, M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, M. Jamil, and H. K. Nguyen, JCAP 2024, 071 (2024), arXiv:2405.10559 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Kluzniak and M

    W. Kluzniak and M. A. Abramowicz, Acta Phys. Pol. B 32, 3605 (2001)

    2001

  13. [22]

    T¨ or¨ ok, M

    G. T¨ or¨ ok, M. A. Abramowicz, W. Klu´ zniak, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Astron. Astrophys.436, 1 (2005)

    2005

  14. [23]

    R. A. Remillard, J. E. McClintock, J. A. Orosz, and A. M. Levine, Astrophys. J.637, 1002 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0407025 [astro-ph]

    2006

  15. [24]

    Stuchl ´ ık, A

    Z. Stuchl ´ ık, A. Kotrlov´ a, and G. T¨ or¨ ok, Astron. Astro- phys.552, A10 (2013), arXiv:1305.3552 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Stella, M

    L. Stella, M. Vietri, and S. M. Morsink, Astrophys. J. 524, L63 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9907346 [astro-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Rezzolla, S

    L. Rezzolla, S. Yoshida, T. J. Maccarone, and O. Zanotti, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.344, L37 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0307487

    2003 arXiv

  18. [27]

    T¨ or¨ ok, A

    G. T¨ or¨ ok, A. Kotrlov´ a, E.ˇSr´ amkov´ a, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Astron. Astrophys.531, A59 (2011), arXiv:1103.2438 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Titarchuk and N

    L. Titarchuk and N. Shaposhnikov, Astrophys. J.626, 298 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503081

    2005 arXiv

  20. [29]

    German´ a, Phys

    C. German´ a, Phys. Rev. D98, 083025 (2018), arXiv:1810.12426 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Koloˇ s, Z

    M. Koloˇ s, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, and A. Tursunov, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 165009 (2015), arXiv:1506.06799 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Stuchlik, P

    Z. Stuchlik, P. Slany, and G. Torok, Astron. Astrophys. 470, 401 (2007), arXiv:0704.1252 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  23. [33]

    Jusufi, M

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, M. Jamil, S.-W. Wei, Q. Wu, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D103, 024013 (2021), arXiv:2008.08450 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [34]

    Shaymatov, J

    S. Shaymatov, J. Vrba, D. Malafarina, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Phys. Dark Universe30, 100648 (2020), arXiv:2005.12410 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [35]

    Shaymatov, M

    S. Shaymatov, M. Jamil, K. Jusufi, and K. Bamba, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 636 (2022), arXiv:2205.00270 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [36]

    Ghasemi-Nodehi, M

    M. Ghasemi-Nodehi, M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, K. Jusufi, and M. Jamil, Phys. Rev. D102, 104032 (2020), arXiv:2011.02276 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [37]

    Rayimbaev, B

    J. Rayimbaev, B. Majeed, M. Jamil, K. Jusufi, and A. Wang, Phys. Dark Universe35, 100930 (2022), arXiv:2202.11509 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [38]

    Shaymatov, B

    S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, M. De Laurentis, M. Jamil, Q. Wu, A. Wang, and M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Astrophys. J. 959, 6 (2023), arXiv:2307.10804 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [39]

    Shaymatov, K

    S. Shaymatov, K. Jusufi, M. Alloqulov, and B. Ahmedov, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 997 (2023), arXiv:2303.06494 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [40]

    Mustafa, E

    [40] G. Mustafa, E. Demir, F. Javed, S. Maurya, E. G¨ udekli, S. Murodov, and F. Atamurotov, Phys. Dark Universe46, 101708 (2024)

    2024

  31. [41]

    Mitra, J

    S. Mitra, J. Vrba, J. Rayimbaev, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, and B. Ahmedov, Physics of the Dark Universe46, 101561 (2024)

    2024

  32. [42]

    Davlataliev, B

    A. Davlataliev, B. Narzilloev, I. Hussain, A. Abdujab- barov, and B. Ahmedov, Physics of the Dark Universe 46, 101569 (2024)

    2024

  33. [43]

    Bambi, Phys

    C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D85, 043002 (2012), arXiv:1201.1638 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Bambi, J

    C. Bambi, J. Jiang, and J. F. Steiner, Class. Quantum Grav.33, 064001 (2016), arXiv:1511.07587 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [45]

    M. A. Abramowicz and P. C. Fragile, Living Rev. Rel- ativ.16, 1 (2013), arXiv:1104.5499 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [46]

    R. P. Fender, T. M. Belloni, and E. Gallo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.355, 1105 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0409360 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Auchettl, J

    K. Auchettl, J. Guillochon, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, As- trophys. J.838, 149 (2017), arXiv:1611.02291 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [48]

    The IceCube Collaboration and et al., Science361, eaat1378 (2018), arXiv:1807.08816 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer, Singapore, 2017)

    C. Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer, Singapore, 2017)

    2017

  40. [50]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford University Press., New York, 1998)

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford University Press., New York, 1998)

    1998

  41. [51]

    H. K. Nguyen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A2450100(2023), arXiv:2305.12037v3 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [52]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Grav- itation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    1973

  43. [53]

    Bambi,Introduction to general relativity: a course for undergraduate students of physics(Springer, 2018)

    C. Bambi,Introduction to general relativity: a course for undergraduate students of physics(Springer, 2018)

    2018

  44. [54]

    Bambi, Universe10(2024)

    C. Bambi, Universe10(2024)

    2024

  45. [55]

    Narzilloev and B

    B. Narzilloev and B. Ahmedov, Symmetry14(2022)

    2022

  46. [56]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983)

    1983

  47. [57]

    Shaymatov, P

    S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran, and S. Siwach, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104059 (2022), arXiv:2110.10610 [gr-qc]. 10

    2022 arXiv

  48. [58]

    J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, S. W. Davis, L. Gou, A. Kulkarni, J. A. Orosz, R. F. Penna, R. A. Remillard, and J. F. Steiner, Class. Quantum Grav.28, 114009 (2011), arXiv:1101.0811 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [59]

    Barret, J.-F

    D. Barret, J.-F. Olive, and M. C. Miller, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.361, 855 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505402 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  50. [60]

    T. M. Belloni, A. Sanna, and M. M´ endez, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.426, 1701 (2012), arXiv:1207.2311 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Kotrlov´ a, Z

    A. Kotrlov´ a, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, and G. T¨ or¨ ok, Class. Quantum Grav.25, 225016 (2008), arXiv:0812.0720

    2008 arXiv

  52. [62]

    T. E. Strohmayer, Astrophys. J. Lett.552, L49 (2001)

    2001

  53. [63]

    Shafee, J

    R. Shafee, J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, S. W. Davis, L.-X. Li, and R. A. Remillard, Astrophys. J. Lett.636, L113 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0508302 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  54. [64]

    Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Z

    M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Z. Chen, B. Deng, M. Jamil, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, and Y.-K. Lim, Phys. Rev. D102, 044028 (2020), arXiv:2004.02602 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [65]

    A. N. Aliev and D. V. Galtsov, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 13, 899 (1981)

    1981

  56. [66]

    Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Int

    M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1950013 (2019)

    2019

  57. [67]

    M. A. Abramowicz, V. Karas, W. Kluzniak, W. H. Lee, and P. Rebusco, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap.55, 467 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302183. [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Hor´ ak and V

    J. Hor´ ak and V. Karas, Astron. Astrophys.451, 377 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601053 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Rebusco, Publ

    P. Rebusco, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap.56, 553 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403341 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  60. [70]

    Banerjee, JCAP 034 (2022), arXiv:2203.10890 [gr-qc]

    I. Banerjee, JCAP 034 (2022), arXiv:2203.10890 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [71]

    Deligianni, B

    E. Deligianni, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, P. Nedkova, and S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D104, 064043 (2021), arXiv:2107.01421 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [72]

    Stuchl ´ ık and M

    Z. Stuchl ´ ık and M. Koloˇ s, A&A586, A130 (2016)

    2016

  63. [73]

    Shahzadi, M

    M. Shahzadi, M. Koloˇ s, R. Saleem, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Class. Quantum Grav.41, 075014 (2024), arXiv:2309.09712 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [74]

    T. Zhu, H. K. Nguyen, M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, and M. Jamil, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 330 (2024), arXiv:2402.16922 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [75]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne,Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics: Black Holes,343(1973)

    1973

  66. [76]

    Bondi, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society112, 195 (1952)

    H. Bondi, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society112, 195 (1952)

    1952

  67. [77]

    S. W. Davis, C. Done, and O. M. Blaes, The Astrophys- ical Journal647, 525-538 (2006)

    2006

  68. [78]

    A. H. Bokhari, J. Rayimbaev, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D102, 124078 (2020)

    2020

  69. [79]

    Rayimbaev, S

    J. Rayimbaev, S. Shaymatov, and M. Jamil, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 699 (2021), arXiv:2107.13436 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [80]

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J.191, 499 (1974)

    1974

  71. [81]

    J. M. Bardeen, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), edited by C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt (1973) pp. 215–239

    1973

  72. [82]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Astron. Astrophys. 24, 337 (1973)

    1973

  73. [83]

    K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J.191, 507 (1974)

    1974

  74. [84]

    Boshkayev, R

    K. Boshkayev, R. Giamb` o, T. Konysbayev, E. Kur- manov, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, and H. Quevedo, (2021), arXiv:2110.15402 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [85]

    Boshkayev, T

    K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, Y. Kurmanov, O. Lu- ongo, and D. Malafarina, The Astrophysical Journal 936, 96 (2022)

    2022

  76. [86]

    Boshkayev, T

    K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, Y. Kurmanov, O. Lu- ongo, M. Muccino, A. Taukenova, and A. Urazalina, (2023), arXiv:2307.15003 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [87]

    Jumaniyozov, M

    S. Jumaniyozov, M. Zahid, M. Alloqulov, I. Ibragimov, J. Rayimbaev, and S. Murodov, The European Physical Journal C85, 126 (2025)

    2025

  78. [88]

    Alloqulov and S

    M. Alloqulov and S. Shaymatov, The European Physical Journal Plus139, 731 (2024)

    2024

  79. [89]

    Kurmanov, M

    Y. Kurmanov, M. Muccino, K. Boshkayev, T. Konys- bayev, O. Luongo, H. Quevedo, and A. Urazalina, (2023), arXiv:2306.15050 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [90]

    Kurmanov, K

    Y. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, O. Lu- ongo, N. Saiyp, A. Urazalina, G. Ikhsan, and G. Suliyeva, (2024), arXiv:2404.15437 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [91]

    Kurmanov, K

    Y. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, M. Muc- cino, O. Luongo, A. Urazalina, A. Dalelkhankyzy, F. Belissarova, and M. Alimkulova, (2025), arXiv:2503.18028 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  82. [92]

    Boshkayev, A

    K. Boshkayev, A. Idrissov, O. Luongo, and D. Mala- farina, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.496, 1115 (2020), arXiv:2006.01269 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [93]

    Shaymatov, K

    S. Shaymatov, K. Jusufi, M. Alloqulov, and B. Ahme- dov, The European Physical Journal Plus138, 997 (2023)

    2023

  84. [94]

    Alloqulov, S

    M. Alloqulov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and A. Jawad, Chinese Physics C48, 025101 (2024)

    2024

  85. [95]

    Turimov, A

    B. Turimov, A. Davlataliev, Y. Usmanov, S. Karshi- boev, and P. Tadjimuratov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1098 (2024)

    2024

  86. [96]

    D’Agostino, R

    R. D’Agostino, R. Giamb` o, and O. Luongo, Physical Review D107(2023)

    2023

  87. [97]

    C. T. Cunningham and J. M. Bardeen, Astrophys. J. 183, 237 (1973)

    1973

  88. [98]

    C. T. Cunningham, Astrophys. J.202, 788 (1975)

    1975

  89. [99]

    Fanton, M

    C. Fanton, M. Calvani, F. de Felice, and A. ˇCadeˇ z, Pub- lications of the Astronomical Society of Japan49, 159 (1997)

    1997

  90. [100]

    B. Chen, R. Kantowski, X. Dai, E. Baron, and P. Mad- dumage, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 218, 4 (2015)

    2015

  91. [101]

    Chandrasekhar,Radiative Transfer,Dover Publica- tions (1960)

    S. Chandrasekhar,Radiative Transfer,Dover Publica- tions (1960)

    1960

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.