Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Bulk spin-orbit torque-driven spin Hall nano-oscillators using PtBi alloys

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Alloying Pt with 6% Bi raises the spin Hall efficiency from 0.07 to 0.24 and cuts the threshold current of 100 nm spin Hall nano-oscillators by 42%.

desk verdict The device-level threshold-current win is likely real; the absolute θSH numbers are not yet isolated from the Ta seed layer, so treat 0.24 as an upper bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10219 v1 pith:36AYYLCO submitted 2025-07-14 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-ph

Utkarsh Shashank , Akash Kumar , Tahereh Sadat Parvini , Hauke Heyen , Lunjie Zeng , Andrew B. Yankovich , Mona Rajabali , Eva Olsson
show 2 more authors
Markus Münzenberg Johan {AA}kerman
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords spin-orbittorquespinHalleffectnano-oscillatorPtBialloythresholdcurrentside-jumpscatteringST-FMRauto-oscillation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Spin Hall nano-oscillators are nanoscale microwave sources driven by a spin current produced in a heavy-metal layer, and their usefulness depends on keeping the threshold current low. This paper aims to establish that adding a few percent of bismuth to platinum, specifically 6.0 at% Bi, raises the spin Hall efficiency (the conversion of charge current into spin current) from 0.07 in pure Pt to 0.24, and that this directly lowers the threshold current of a 100 nm oscillator from 1.30 mA to 0.75 mA, a 42% reduction. The authors attribute the gain to a bulk, extrinsic side-jump scattering mechanism rather than to interface effects, based on structural imaging, torque symmetry, and resistivity scaling. If right, PtBi alloys offer a practical, low-resistivity alternative to ion-implanted or insulating spin Hall layers for energy-efficient spintronic devices such as SOT-MRAM and neuromorphic oscillator networks.

What carries the argument

The central quantity is the spin Hall efficiency θSH, defined by js = (ℏ/2e) θSH (jc × σ̂), which the paper extracts from the DC-bias-induced linewidth modulation δ(µ0ΔH)/Idc using Eq. (4): θSH = (2e/ℏ)[(H0 + Meff)/2] μ0 Ms t |Δαeff/Δjdc,HM| / sin ϕ. The argument for the mechanism rests on the scaling relation ρSH_imp ∝ ρ_imp², the signature of extrinsic side-jump scattering (the spin-dependent sideways deflection of electron trajectories at impurities), together with the parallel-resistor estimate of the current density in the PtBi layer. Structural tools (GIXRD, cross-sectional TEM, and EDS) do the supporting work of showing that Bi is uniformly incorporated, that Pt crystallinity decreases, and that the largest θSH appears near the crystalline-to-disordered transition.

What would settle it

Fabricate the same Co40Fe40B20/PtBi bilayer on a seed layer that produces no spin-orbit torque, or with tantalum seed thickness varied from zero to several nanometres, and repeat the DC-bias ST-FMR linewidth-modulation measurement; if the extracted spin Hall efficiency drops substantially when tantalum is removed or thinned, part of the claimed enhancement comes from the seed layer rather than the PtBi alloy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Pt100−xBix alloys with small Bi concentrations act as efficient bulk spin Hall materials: the spin Hall efficiency θSH rises from 0.07 ± 0.01 for pure Pt to 0.24 ± 0.02 for Pt94.0Bi6.0 and 0.19 ± 0.01 for Pt91.3Bi8.7, as extracted from DC-bias spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance on Co40Fe40B20/PtBi bilayers. The same alloying reduces the threshold current Ith of 100 nm spin Hall nano-oscillators by 42% (from 1.30 mA to 0.75 mA) at 6.0% Bi and by 32% at 8.7% Bi, despite an increase in the ferromagnet's Gilbert damping. The paper identifies the mechanism as bulk-dominated extrinsic side-jump scattering: the impurity spin Hall resistivity scales quadratically with impurity resistivity, the torque shows the bulk-SOT sin 2ϕ cos ϕ angular symmetry, and TEM-EDS shows Bi distributed uniformly through the Pt layer without interfacial clustering. Structural characterization ties the efficiency peak to the loss of Pt crystallinity as Bi content increases, placing the optimum near 6% Bi.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the measured damping modulation comes almost entirely from spin-orbit torque generated in the PtBi layer itself, but the stacks contain a 2.4 nm tantalum seed layer that can also produce spin-orbit torque, and the paper does not subtract or bound its contribution; if that tantalum torque is substantial, the reported spin Hall efficiencies are overestimated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At 6.0% Bi the threshold current of a 100 nm SHNO falls to 0.75 mA, so PtBi-based devices can sustain auto-oscillation at substantially lower drive current than pure-Pt devices.
  • Because the spin Hall efficiency rises without the very high resistivities seen in ion-implanted or nitrided metals, PtBi alloys improve the power figure of merit ρxx/θSH² used for SOT-MRAM comparisons.
  • The bulk, side-jump origin means the torque is not tied to a specific PtBi/ferromagnet interface, so the efficiency gain should transfer to other ferromagnets and capping stacks.
  • The efficiency peaks near 6% Bi and declines at 8.7% Bi, indicating an optimal composition window rather than a monotonic gain with more bismuth.
  • Even though Bi doping raises Gilbert damping, the enhanced damping-like torque overcompensates, so the threshold current still decreases; pairing PtBi with a lower-damping ferromagnet would make the reduction larger.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A Ta-free control stack would quantify how much of the 0.24 θSH comes from the PtBi alloy rather than the seed layer, a test the paper does not report.
  • The side-jump mechanism predicts that θSH should track impurity resistivity as ρxx is tuned by temperature or composition; measuring θSH at low temperatures could confirm the extrinsic picture independently of structural data.
  • If the threshold-current reduction scales to smaller constrictions, PtBi could be combined with ultra-low-damping ferrimagnets to push SHNO drive currents below the values reported here.
  • The same co-evaporation recipe could be tested in harmonic Hall or spin-pumping geometries to cross-check θSH without relying on ST-FMR linewidth assumptions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance (ST-FMR) and spin Hall nano-oscillator (SHNO) measurements on electron-beam co-evaporated Pt100−xBix/Co40Fe40B20 stacks with x = 0, 3.9, 6.0, and 8.7 at.%. The authors report that alloying Pt with Bi increases the spin Hall efficiency θSH from 0.07 in pure Pt to 0.24 in Pt94.0Bi6.0 and 0.19 in Pt91.3Bi8.7, as extracted from DC-bias ST-FMR linewidth modulation. They attribute this enhancement to bulk extrinsic side-jump scattering based on a ρSH_imp ∝ ρ^2_imp scaling analysis. In 100 nm SHNOs they observe a 42% reduction in threshold current Ith for Pt94.0Bi6.0 (from 1.30 mA to 0.75 mA) and a 32% reduction for Pt91.3Bi8.7 (to 0.89 mA), accompanied by higher output power and narrower linewidth. Structural characterization by GIXRD and TEM shows reduced Pt crystallinity and uniform Bi distribution with slight interfacial enrichment. The paper concludes that PtBi alloys are a promising low-resistivity spin-current source for energy-efficient SOT-MRAM and neuromorphic SHNO applications.

Significance. If the absolute θSH values are correct, the reported threefold enhancement over pure Pt at a modest resistivity increase would be a practically useful result for SOT-MRAM and SHNO applications, and the comparative Ith reduction in identical device geometries is a meaningful demonstration. The manuscript has several strengths: it combines structural, spin-torque, and device-level measurements; the angular dependence of the ST-FMR signal is checked; and the threshold-current comparison is internally consistent and directly relevant to applications. However, the central quantitative claim—that the absolute θSH increases from 0.07 to 0.24 as a property of the PtBi layer—depends on an extraction that does not account for the spin-Hall-active Ta seed layer, and the side-jump mechanism is inferred from a four-point scaling analysis with one forced origin. These issues make the paper's main quantitative claim not yet fully established, although the comparative trends are likely robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (4); Section 4.1, Figs. 1b–c] The absolute θSH values are extracted by attributing the entire DC-bias linewidth modulation to a spin current generated in the 4 nm PtBi layer, with jdc,HM obtained from a parallel-resistor model that includes the Ta seed layer only as a resistive shunt. However, every stack contains a 2.4 nm Ta seed (Section 4.1; Figs. 1b,c) that is itself a spin-Hall metal and is not accounted for as a torque source. Because ρxx of the PtBi layer rises from 65 to 270–301 μΩ·cm with Bi content, the same total current redistributes increasingly into Ta, so a Ta-derived antidamping torque would grow relative to the PtBi torque and could mimic part of the reported θSH-versus-Bi trend. The pure-Pt stack also contains Ta, so the 0.07 reference value does not anchor the absolute scale. The sin2φcosφ angular dependence (Supporting S4) has the same symmetry for interfacial and Ta-generated torques and therefore cannot rule out this channel. A Ta-free control or a quantitative bound on the Ta torque contribution is needed to support the threefold absolute enhancement claim; without it, only the relative trend and the Ith reduction are established.
  2. [Section 2.4, Fig. 5f] The claim that the enhanced θSH originates from extrinsic side-jump scattering rests on the ρSH_imp ∝ ρ^2_imp scaling shown in Fig. 5f and the extraction described in Supporting S10. This extraction subtracts an assumed composition-independent intrinsic SH contribution equal to that of pure Pt, and it defines ρSH_imp for pure Pt to be zero by construction. With only four data points, one of which is this forced origin, the quadratic fit is not a strong test of the mechanism; in particular, the non-monotonic θSH (0.24 at x=6.0 versus 0.19 at x=8.7) is not reflected in the scaling analysis, and alternative mechanisms (e.g., disorder-enhanced intrinsic SHE) are not quantitatively excluded. A direct test, such as comparing the resistivity scaling of the anomalous Hall effect or measuring a wider composition series, would be needed to establish side-jump dominance.
  3. [Section 2.2, Fig. 3; Ref. [41]] The reported θSH=0.19 for Pt91.3Bi8.7 is not reconciled with the previously reported value of 0.10 for Pt92Bi8 cited as Ref. [41] (Hong et al., Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018). Both are nearly the same composition, yet the present value is roughly twice as large. The discrepancy may arise from different measurement techniques (inverse spin Hall effect versus DC-bias ST-FMR) or from the Ta seed or interface differences, but the manuscript does not discuss it. Since the absolute magnitude of θSH is central to the paper's main claim, this omission leaves the reader unable to assess systematic uncertainty in the extraction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] Fig. 5 caption labels the composition axis as 'x in Pt100−xBix (wt.%)', but the text and deposition description use atomic percent; the unit should be corrected for consistency.
  2. [Section 2.1] There is a typo in the phrase 'Both stacks exhibit well-defined, uniform layers tructures' — 'tructures' should be 'structures'.
  3. [Fig. 3] The inline notation in the Fig. 3 panels (e.g., '≈ 0.07 ± 0.01q SH' and 'q SH') appears to be a rendering artifact of the θSH symbol; the figure should be regenerated with consistent mathematical notation.
  4. [Section 2.4] The statement that 'the output power is visibly higher at 6% and 8.7% Bi' would be more convincing if quantified in the main text rather than referenced only to Supporting S9.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline theta_SH and I_th values come from direct measurements; the only mild concern is the side-jump mechanism subsection, which relies on an opaque subtraction and same-group citations.

full rationale

The central quantitative claims are not circular. The theta_SH values are extracted from direct DC-bias ST-FMR linewidth slopes using the standard Eq. (4), with the PtBi current density obtained from a parallel-resistor model; no parameter is fitted to force the reported theta_SH enhancement. The I_th values are obtained directly from the onset of power spectral density in the SHNO measurements and are not derived from the theta_SH fits. The sin(2phi)cos(phi) angular dependence is a measured symmetry check, not an input definition of the result. The only questionable portion is the mechanism attribution in Section 2.4 and Fig. 5f: the paper states that 'the intrinsic SHE contribution was subtracted, revealing rho_SH_imp proportional to rho_imp^2', but the subtraction protocol is delegated to Supporting Information S10 and to prior papers by the same group, so the side-jump scaling is not independently demonstrated in the main text. This is a self-citation-supported, underdetermined mechanistic interpretation rather than a definitional reduction of the headline numbers. The concern about the Ta seed layer contributing spin current is a real correctness risk for the absolute theta_SH scale, but it is not a circularity: the extraction does not assume the Ta-free conclusion it reports. Therefore no central claim reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reported θSH values rest on the standard ST-FMR measurement model, the parallel resistor current partition, and the neglected Ta seed contribution. The side-jump mechanism rests on a decomposition of θSH into intrinsic and impurity parts that is not independently verified.

free parameters (4)
  • CoFeB saturation magnetization (μ0Ms)
    Eq. (4) requires μ0Ms to convert linewidth slope to θSH; the paper quotes Meff and Hk but does not report Ms, so a value must be assumed or separately measured.
  • Parallel resistor layer resistivities (Ta, CoFeB)
    The current density in PtBi is obtained from a parallel resistor model (S5); resistivities of Ta and CoFeB are not given in the main text, so the current partitioning is model-dependent.
  • Intrinsic spin Hall contribution subtracted to define ρSH_imp = pure Pt value
    Section 2.4 subtracts an assumed composition-independent intrinsic SHE contribution (the pure Pt value) to isolate the impurity-induced part; if the intrinsic part changes with alloying, the scaling is an artifact.
  • Impurity resistivity ρ_imp
    Obtained as ρxx(alloy) - ρxx(Pt), assuming Matthiessen's rule, which may not strictly hold for alloy disorder.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The DC-bias ST-FMR linewidth modulation is proportional to the damping-like spin torque, described by Eq. (4) of Ref. [16].
    Section 2.2 invokes the standard ST-FMR model to extract θSH from the slope of δ(μ0ΔH) vs Idc; this assumes no other current-dependent damping mechanisms.
  • domain assumption The angular dependence sin 2φ cos φ of the SOT line shape identifies a conventional bulk SHE torque and rules out symmetry-breaking torques.
    Used in Section 2.2 to support the bulk SOT origin, but the same symmetry is expected for any collinear SHE source, including the Ta seed layer.
  • ad hoc to paper The intrinsic SHE contribution to θSH is independent of Bi concentration and equal to that of pure Pt.
    Needed in Section 2.4 to define ρSH_imp = θSH - θSH(Pt) and test the ρ^2 scaling; this is a modeling assumption tailored to the paper's decomposition.
  • domain assumption The parallel resistor model applies with no interfacial resistance between Ta, PtBi, and CoFeB.
    Used to compute j_dc,HM and hence θSH; interfacial layers such as the Bi-enriched PtBi/CoFeB interface could alter current distribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bulk spin-orbit torque-driven spin Hall nano-oscillators using PtBi alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/36AYYLCO

@misc{pith2026250710219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bulk spin-orbit torque-driven spin Hall nano-oscillators using PtBi alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/36AYYLCO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10219}
}
abstract

Spin-orbit-torque-driven auto-oscillations in spin Hall nano-oscillators (SHNOs) offer a transformative pathway toward energy-efficient, nanoscale microwave devices for next-generation neuromorphic computing and high-frequency technologies. A key requirement for achieving robust, sustained oscillations is reducing the threshold current ($I_{\text{th}}$), strongly governed by spin Hall efficiency ($\theta_{\text{SH}}$). However, conventional strategies to enhance $\theta_{\text{SH}}$ face trade-offs, including high longitudinal resistivity, interfacial effects, and symmetry-breaking torques that limit performance. Here, we demonstrate a substantial enhancement of the bulk spin Hall effect in PtBi alloys, achieving over a threefold increase in $\theta_{\text{SH}}$, from 0.07 in pure Pt to 0.24 in Pt$_{94.0}$Bi$_{6.0}$ and 0.19 in Pt$_{91.3}$Bi$_{8.7}$, as extracted from DC-bias spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance. The enhanced $\theta_{\text{SH}}$ originates from bulk-dominated, extrinsic side-jump scattering across all PtBi compositions. Correspondingly, we observe a 42\% and 32\% reduction in $I_{\text{th}}$ in 100 nm SHNOs based on Co$_{40}$Fe$_{40}$B$_{20}$(3 nm)/Pt$_{94.0}$Bi$_{6.0}$(4 nm) and Co$_{40}$Fe$_{40}$B$_{20}$(3 nm)/Pt$_{91.3}$Bi$_{8.7}$(4 nm), respectively. Structural characterization reveals reduced Pt crystallinity, along with emergence of preferred crystallographic orientations upon introducing higher Bi concentrations. Together, these results position PtBi alloys as a compelling alternative to conventional 5$d$ transition metals, enabling enhanced $\theta_{\text{SH}}$ and significantly lower $I_{\text{th}}$, thus opening new avenues for energy-efficient neuromorphic computing and magnetic random access memory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10219 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) GIXRD patterns of the pure Pt stack (black) and PtBi alloy stacks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Schematic of the SHE and the microscopic mechanism of the ST-FMR excita [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Current-induced modulation of linewidth, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Schematic of the SHNO and measurement setup. b) SEM image of the GSG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) ρxx, b) θSH, and c) Ith versus Bi content x in Pt100−xBix (wt.%). Error bars in (b) represent standard error from equation 2 and 4; in (c), mean deviation (MD) from Ith datasets (Supporting Information S7 for datasets; see Experimental Section for MD details). θSH p…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Giant inverse spin hall effect in bi doped ptbi alloy

    Caiyun Hong, Lichuan Jin, Huaiwu Zhang, Mingming Li, Yiheng Rao, Bo Ma, Jialu Li, Zhiyong Zhong, and Qinghui Yang. Giant inverse spin hall effect in bi doped ptbi alloy. Advanced Electronic Materials, 4(8):1700632, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [1]

    Roadmap of spin–orbit torques

    Qiming Shao, Peng Li, Luqiao Liu, Hyunsoo Yang, Shunsuke Fukami, Armin Razavi, Hao Wu, Kang Wang, Frank Freimuth, Yuriy Mokrousov, et al. Roadmap of spin–orbit torques. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics , 57(7):1–39, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    Spin hall effect.Physical review letters, 83(9):1834, 1999

    JE Hirsch. Spin hall effect.Physical review letters, 83(9):1834, 1999

    work page 1999

  4. [3]

    Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors

    Mikhail I Dyakonov and VI Perel. Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors. Physics Letters A , 35(6):459–460, 1971

    work page 1971

  5. [4]

    Dieny, I

    B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas, et al. Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry.Nat. Electron., 3(8):446– 459, Aug 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    Luqiao Liu, Chi-Feng Pai, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman. Spin- Torque Switching with the Giant Spin Hall Effect of Tantalum.Science, 336:555–558, 2012. 13

    work page 2012

  7. [6]

    Switching of perpen- dicular magnetization by spin–orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields

    Guoqiang Yu, Pramey Upadhyaya, Yabin Fan, Juan G Alzate, Wanjun Jiang, Kin L Wong, So Takei, Scott A Bender, Li-Te Chang, Ying Jiang, et al. Switching of perpen- dicular magnetization by spin–orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotechnol., 9(7):548–554, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection.Nature, 476(7359):189–193, 2011

    Ioan Mihai Miron, Kevin Garello, Gilles Gaudin, Pierre-Jean Zermatten, Marius V Costache, Stéphane Auffret, Sébastien Bandiera, Bernard Rodmacq, Alain Schuhl, and Pietro Gambardella. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection.Nature, 476(7359):189–193, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    First demonstration of field-free perpendicular sot-mram for ultrafast and high-density embedded memories

    K Cai, G Talmelli, K Fan, S Van Beek, V Kateel, M Gupta, MG Monteiro, M Ben Chroud, G Jayakumar, A Trovato, et al. First demonstration of field-free perpendicular sot-mram for ultrafast and high-density embedded memories. In 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) ,...

    2022

  2. [9]

    Spin-orbit torque–driven propagating spin waves

    Himanshu Fulara, Mohammad Zahedinejad, Roman Khymyn, AA Awad, Shreyas Mu- ralidhar, Mykola Dvornik, and Johan Åkerman. Spin-orbit torque–driven propagating spin waves. Science advances, 5(9):eaax8467, 2019

    2019

  3. [10]

    Spin-wave- mediated mutual synchronization and phase tuning in spin hall nano-oscillators.Nature Physics, 21:245–252, 2025

    Akash Kumar, Avinash Kumar Chaurasiya, Victor H González, Nilamani Behera, Ademir Alemán, Roman Khymyn, Ahmad A Awad, and Johan Åkerman. Spin-wave- mediated mutual synchronization and phase tuning in spin hall nano-oscillators.Nature Physics, 21:245–252, 2025

    2025

  4. [11]

    Nanoconstriction-based spin-hall nano-oscillator.Applied Physics Letters, 105(17), 2014

    VE Demidov, S Urazhdin, A Zholud, AV Sadovnikov, and SO Demokritov. Nanoconstriction-based spin-hall nano-oscillator.Applied Physics Letters, 105(17), 2014

    2014

  5. [12]

    Mutual synchronization in spin-torque and spin hall nano- oscillators

    Akash Kumar, Artem Litvinenko, Nilamani Behera, Ahmad A Awad, Roman Khymyn, and Johan Åkerman. Mutual synchronization in spin-torque and spin hall nano- oscillators. Nanomagnets as Dynamical Systems: Physics and Applications , pages 143– 182, 2024

    2024

  6. [13]

    Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls

    Satoru Emori, Uwe Bauer, Sung-Min Ahn, Eduardo Martinez, and Geoffrey SD Beach. Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nature materials , 12(7):611–616, 2013

    2013

  7. [14]

    Spin-torque skyrmion resonance in a frustrated magnet

    Nirel Bernstein, Hang Li, Benjamin Assouline, Yong-Chang Lau, Igor Rozhansky, Wen- hong Wang, and Amir Capua. Spin-torque skyrmion resonance in a frustrated magnet. Nat. Commun., 16(1):1–9, 2025

    2025

  8. [15]

    Matching domain-wall configuration and spin-orbit torques for efficient domain-wall motion.Phys

    AV Khvalkovskiy, V Cros, D Apalkov, V Nikitin, M Krounbi, KA Zvezdin, A Anane, J Grollier, and A Fert. Matching domain-wall configuration and spin-orbit torques for efficient domain-wall motion.Phys. Rev. B , 87(2):020402, 2013

    2013

  9. [16]

    Spin-torque ferro- magneticresonanceinducedbythespinhalleffect

    Luqiao Liu, Takahiro Moriyama, D_C Ralph, and R_A Buhrman. Spin-torque ferro- magneticresonanceinducedbythespinhalleffect. Physical review letters, 106(3):036601, 2011. 14

    2011

  10. [17]

    Spectral characteristics of the microwave emission by the spin hall nano-oscillator.Physical review letters, 110(14):147601, 2013

    RH Liu, WL Lim, and S Urazhdin. Spectral characteristics of the microwave emission by the spin hall nano-oscillator.Physical review letters, 110(14):147601, 2013

    2013

  11. [18]

    Modulation of effective damping constant using spin hall effect

    Shinya Kasai, Kouta Kondou, Hiroaki Sukegawa, Seiji Mitani, Kazuhito Tsukagoshi, and Yoshichika Otani. Modulation of effective damping constant using spin hall effect. Applied Physics Letters, 104(9), 2014

    2014

  12. [19]

    Spin-torque and spin-hall nano-oscillators.Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(10):1919–1945, 2016

    Tingsu Chen, Randy K Dumas, Anders Eklund, Pranaba K Muduli, Afshin Houshang, Ahmad A Awad, Philipp Dürrenfeld, B Gunnar Malm, Ana Rusu, and Johan Åkerman. Spin-torque and spin-hall nano-oscillators.Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(10):1919–1945, 2016

    1919

  13. [20]

    Long-rangemutualsynchronizationofspinhallnano-oscillators

    AA Awad, Ph Dürrenfeld, A Houshang, M Dvornik, Ezio Iacocca, RK Dumas, and JohanÅkerman. Long-rangemutualsynchronizationofspinhallnano-oscillators. Nature Physics, 13(3):292–299, 2017

    2017

  14. [21]

    Robust mutual synchronization in long spin hall nano-oscillator chains

    Akash Kumar, Himanshu Fulara, Roman Khymyn, Artem Litvinenko, Mohammad Za- hedinejad, MonaRajabali, XiaotianZhao, NilamaniBehera, AfshinHoushang, AhmadA Awad, et al. Robust mutual synchronization in long spin hall nano-oscillator chains. Nano Letters, 23(14):6720–6726, 2023

    2023

  15. [22]

    Two- dimensional mutually synchronized spin hall nano-oscillator arrays for neuromorphic computing

    Mohammad Zahedinejad, Ahmad A Awad, Shreyas Muralidhar, Roman Khymyn, Himanshu Fulara, Hamid Mazraati, Mykola Dvornik, and Johan Åkerman. Two- dimensional mutually synchronized spin hall nano-oscillator arrays for neuromorphic computing. Nature nanotechnology, 15(1):47–52, 2020

    2020

  16. [23]

    Ultra-low current 10 nm spin hall nano-oscillators

    Nilamani Behera, Avinash Kumar Chaurasiya, Victor H González, Artem Litvinenko, Lakhan Bainsla, Akash Kumar, Roman Khymyn, Ahmad A Awad, Himanshu Fulara, and Johan Åkerman. Ultra-low current 10 nm spin hall nano-oscillators. Advanced Materials, 36(5):2305002, 2024

    2024

  17. [24]

    Ultra-large mu- tually synchronized networks of 10 nm spin hall nano-oscillators

    Nilamani Behera, Avinash Kumar Chaurasiya, Akash Kumar, Roman Khymyn, Artem Litvinenko, Lakhan Bainsla, Ahmad A Awad, and Johan Åkerman. Ultra-large mu- tually synchronized networks of 10 nm spin hall nano-oscillators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18321, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Memristive control of mutual spin hall nano-oscillator synchronization for neuromorphic computing

    Mohammad Zahedinejad, Himanshu Fulara, Roman Khymyn, Afshin Houshang, Mykola Dvornik, Shunsuke Fukami, Shun Kanai, Hideo Ohno, and Johan Åkerman. Memristive control of mutual spin hall nano-oscillator synchronization for neuromorphic computing. Nature materials, 21(1):81–87, 2022

    2022

  19. [26]

    Neuromorphic computing with nanoscale spintronic oscillators.Nature, 547(7664):428– 431, 2017

    Jacob Torrejon, Mathieu Riou, Flavio Abreu Araujo, Sumito Tsunegi, Guru Khalsa, Damien Querlioz, Paolo Bortolotti, Vincent Cros, Kay Yakushiji, Akio Fukushima, et al. Neuromorphic computing with nanoscale spintronic oscillators.Nature, 547(7664):428– 431, 2017

    2017

  20. [27]

    Neuromorphic spintronics.Nature electronics, 3(7):360–370, 2020

    Julie Grollier, Damien Querlioz, KY Camsari, Karin Everschor-Sitte, Shunsuke Fukami, and Mark D Stiles. Neuromorphic spintronics.Nature electronics, 3(7):360–370, 2020. 15

    2020

  21. [28]

    Phase-binarized spin hall nano-oscillator arrays: Towards spin hall ising machines.Physical Review Applied, 17(1):014003, 2022

    Afshin Houshang, Mohammad Zahedinejad, Shreyas Muralidhar, Jakub Chęciński, Ro- man Khymyn, Mona Rajabali, Himanshu Fulara, Ahmad A Awad, Mykola Dvornik, and Johan Åkerman. Phase-binarized spin hall nano-oscillator arrays: Towards spin hall ising machines.Physical Review Appli...

    2022

  22. [29]

    Voltage-driven gigahertz frequency tuning of spin hall nano-oscillators

    Jong-Guk Choi, Jaehyeon Park, Min-Gu Kang, Doyoon Kim, Jae-Sung Rieh, Kyung-Jin Lee, Kab-Jin Kim, and Byong-Guk Park. Voltage-driven gigahertz frequency tuning of spin hall nano-oscillators. Nature communications, 13(1):3783, 2022

    2022

  23. [30]

    Deter- mination of intrinsic spin hall angle in pt.Applied Physics Letters, 105(15), 2014

    Yi Wang, Praveen Deorani, Xuepeng Qiu, Jae Hyun Kwon, and Hyunsoo Yang. Deter- mination of intrinsic spin hall angle in pt.Applied Physics Letters, 105(15), 2014

    2014

  24. [31]

    Enhanced spin hall effect in s-implanted pt.Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies, 4(1):2000112, 2021

    Utkarsh Shashank, Rohit Medwal, Taiga Shibata, Razia Nongjai, Joseph Vimal Vas, Martial Duchamp, Kandasami Asokan, Rajdeep Singh Rawat, Hironori Asada, Surbhi Gupta, et al. Enhanced spin hall effect in s-implanted pt.Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies, 4(1):2000112, 2021

    2021

  25. [32]

    Highly dose dependent damping-like spin–orbit torque efficiency in o-implanted pt

    Utkarsh Shashank, Rohit Medwal, Yoji Nakamura, John Rex Mohan, Razia Nongjai, Asokan Kandasami, Rajdeep Singh Rawat, Hironori Asada, Surbhi Gupta, and Yasuhiro Fukuma. Highly dose dependent damping-like spin–orbit torque efficiency in o-implanted pt. Applied Physics Letters, 1...

    2021

  26. [33]

    Disentanglement of intrinsic and extrinsic side-jump scattering induced spin hall effect in n-implanted pt.Phys

    Utkarsh Shashank, Yoji Nakamura, Yu Kusaba, Takafumi Tomoda, Razia Nongjai, Asokan Kandasami, Rohit Medwal, Rajdeep Singh Rawat, Hironori Asada, Surbhi Gupta, et al. Disentanglement of intrinsic and extrinsic side-jump scattering induced spin hall effect in n-implanted pt.Phys...

    2023

  27. [34]

    Giant spin-orbit torque induced by spin hall effect in amorphous pt (p) alloys

    Utkarsh Shashank, Takafumi Tomoda, Arun Jacob Mathew, Garima Vashisht, Koki Imai, Yu Kusaba, Chung-Li Dong, Chi-Liang Chen, Yoichi Horibe, Manabu Ishimaru, et al. Giant spin-orbit torque induced by spin hall effect in amorphous pt (p) alloys. NPG Asia Materials , 17(1):15, 2025

    2025

  28. [35]

    Maximizing spin–orbit torque efficiency of ta (o)/py via modulating oxygen-induced interface orbital hybridization

    Liupeng Yang, Yining Fei, Kaiyuan Zhou, Lina Chen, Qingwei Fu, Liyuan Li, Chunjie Yan, Haotian Li, Youwei Du, and Ronghua Liu. Maximizing spin–orbit torque efficiency of ta (o)/py via modulating oxygen-induced interface orbital hybridization. Applied Physics Letters, 118(3), 2021

    2021

  29. [36]

    Enhanced spin–orbit torques by oxygen incorporation in tungsten films.Nature communications, 7(1):10644, 2016

    Kai-Uwe Demasius, Timothy Phung, Weifeng Zhang, Brian P Hughes, See-Hun Yang, Andrew Kellock, Wei Han, Aakash Pushp, and Stuart SP Parkin. Enhanced spin–orbit torques by oxygen incorporation in tungsten films.Nature communications, 7(1):10644, 2016

    2016

  30. [37]

    Tunable spin-orbit torque in cu-ta binary alloy heterostructures.Physical Review B, 96(10):104434, 2017

    Tian-Yue Chen, Chun-Te Wu, Hung-Wei Yen, and Chi-Feng Pai. Tunable spin-orbit torque in cu-ta binary alloy heterostructures.Physical Review B, 96(10):104434, 2017

    2017

  31. [38]

    Giant spin hall effect and spin–orbit torques in 5d transition metal–aluminum alloys from extrinsic scattering

    PengWang, AndreaMigliorini, See-HunYang, Jae-ChunJeon, IlyaKostanovskiy, Holger Meyerheim, Hyeon Han, Hakan Deniz, and Stuart SP Parkin. Giant spin hall effect and spin–orbit torques in 5d transition metal–aluminum alloys from extrinsic scattering. Advanced Materials, 34(23):2...

    2022

  32. [39]

    Extrinsic spin hall effect in cu 1- x pt x.Physical Review Applied, 8(2):024034, 2017

    Rajagopalan Ramaswamy, Yi Wang, Mehrdad Elyasi, M Motapothula, T Venkatesan, Xuepeng Qiu, and Hyunsoo Yang. Extrinsic spin hall effect in cu 1- x pt x.Physical Review Applied, 8(2):024034, 2017

    2017

  33. [40]

    Disentanglement of bulk and interfa- cial spin hall effect in ferromagnet/normal metal interface.Phys

    X Zhou, M Tang, XL Fan, XP Qiu, and SM Zhou. Disentanglement of bulk and interfa- cial spin hall effect in ferromagnet/normal metal interface.Phys. Rev. B, 94(14):144427, 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    Energy-efficient W100−xTax/Co-Fe- B/MgO spin Hall nano-oscillators.Phys

    Nilamani Behera, Himanshu Fulara, Lakhan Bainsla, Akash Kumar, Mohammad Za- hedinejad, Afshin Houshang, and Johan Åkerman. Energy-efficient W100−xTax/Co-Fe- B/MgO spin Hall nano-oscillators.Phys. Rev. Appl. , 18(2):024017, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Charge– spin conversion in pt1- xbix alloys for spin–orbit torque switching.APL Materials, 9(6), 2021

    Zhendong Chi, Yong-Chang Lau, Masashi Kawaguchi, and Masamitsu Hayashi. Charge– spin conversion in pt1- xbix alloys for spin–orbit torque switching.APL Materials, 9(6), 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    Comparative analysis of thz signal emission from bilayer heterostructures: Wideband and high-frequency thz signal advantage of ptbi-based emitter

    Tristan Joachim Winkel, Tahereh Sadat Parvini, Finn-Frederik Stiewe, Jakob Walowski, Farshad Moradi, and Markus Münzenberg. Comparative analysis of thz signal emission from bilayer heterostructures: Wideband and high-frequency thz signal advantage of ptbi-based emitter. Applie...

    2024

  37. [45]

    Rashba-like spin splitting along three momentum directions in trigonal layered ptbi2.Nat

    Ya Feng, Qi Jiang, Baojie Feng, Meng Yang, Tao Xu, Wenjing Liu, Xiufu Yang, Masashi Arita, Eike F Schwier, Kenya Shimada, et al. Rashba-like spin splitting along three momentum directions in trigonal layered ptbi2.Nat. Commun., 10(1):4765, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Surface superconductivity in the topological weyl semimetal t-ptbi2

    Sebastian Schimmel, Yanina Fasano, Sven Hoffmann, Julia Besproswanny, Laura Teresa Corredor Bohorquez, Joaquín Puig, Bat-Chen Elshalem, Beena Kalisky, Grigory Shipunov, Danny Baumann, et al. Surface superconductivity in the topological weyl semimetal t-ptbi2. Nat. Commun., 15(...

    2024

  39. [47]

    Highly fcc-textured pt–al alloy films grown on mgo (001) showing enhanced spin hall efficiency.APL Materials, 9(8), 2021

    Yong-Chang Lau, Takeshi Seki, and Koki Takanashi. Highly fcc-textured pt–al alloy films grown on mgo (001) showing enhanced spin hall efficiency.APL Materials, 9(8), 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Charge–spin interconversion in nitrogen sputtered pt via extrinsic spin hall effect

    Utkarsh Shashank, Yu Kusaba, Junnosuke Nakamura, Arun Jacob Mathew, Koki Imai, Shinya Senba, Hironori Asada, and Yasuhiro Fukuma. Charge–spin interconversion in nitrogen sputtered pt via extrinsic spin hall effect. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 36(32):325802, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Sputtering deposition, xps and x-ray diffraction characterization of hard nitrogen-platinum thin films.Journal of Materials Science, 16:407–412, 1981

    A Hecq, JP Delrue, M Hecq, and T Robert. Sputtering deposition, xps and x-ray diffraction characterization of hard nitrogen-platinum thin films.Journal of Materials Science, 16:407–412, 1981. 17

    1981

  42. [50]

    Tunable damping- like and field-like spin-orbit-torque in pt/co/hfo2 films via interfacial charge transfer

    WL Peng, JY Zhang, GN Feng, XL Xu, C Yang, YL Jia, and GH Yu. Tunable damping- like and field-like spin-orbit-torque in pt/co/hfo2 films via interfacial charge transfer. Applied Physics Letters, 115(17), 2019

    2019

  43. [51]

    Quantifying interface and bulk contributions to spin–orbit torque in magnetic bilayers

    Xin Fan, Halise Celik, Jun Wu, Chaoying Ni, Kyung-Jin Lee, Virginia O Lorenz, and John Q Xiao. Quantifying interface and bulk contributions to spin–orbit torque in magnetic bilayers. Nature communications, 5(1):3042, 2014

    2014

  44. [52]

    Comparison of spin-orbit torques and spin pumping across nife/pt and nife/cu/pt interfaces.Physical Review B, 91(21):214416, 2015

    Tianxiang Nan, Satoru Emori, Carl T Boone, Xinjun Wang, Trevor M Oxholm, John G Jones, Brandon M Howe, Gail J Brown, and Nian X Sun. Comparison of spin-orbit torques and spin pumping across nife/pt and nife/cu/pt interfaces.Physical Review B, 91(21):214416, 2015

    2015

  45. [53]

    Electrical detection of magnetiza- tion dynamics via spin rectification effects.Physics Reports, 661:1–59, 2016

    Michael Harder, Yongsheng Gui, and Can-Ming Hu. Electrical detection of magnetiza- tion dynamics via spin rectification effects.Physics Reports, 661:1–59, 2016

    2016

  46. [54]

    Observation of out-of-plane antidamping torque at the platinum/permalloy interface

    John Rex Mohan, Utkarsh Shashank, Angshuman Deka, Takayasu Hanashima, Rohit Medwal, Surbhi Gupta, Rajdeep Singh Rawat, Hironori Asada, and Yasuhiro Fukuma. Observation of out-of-plane antidamping torque at the platinum/permalloy interface. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces , 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Ultrathin ferrimagnetic gdfeco films with low damping.Advanced Functional Materials, 32(23):2111693, 2022

    Lakhan Bainsla, Akash Kumar, Ahmad A Awad, Chunlei Wang, Mohammad Zahedine- jad, Nilamani Behera, Himanshu Fulara, Roman Khymyn, Afshin Houshang, Jonas Weissenrieder, et al. Ultrathin ferrimagnetic gdfeco films with low damping.Advanced Functional Materials, 32(23):2111693, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    Large spin current generation by the spin hall effect in mixed crystalline phase ta thin films

    Akash Kumar, Rajni Bansal, Sujeet Chaudhary, and Pranaba Kishor Muduli. Large spin current generation by the spin hall effect in mixed crystalline phase ta thin films. Phys. Rev. B , 98(10):104403, 2018

    2018

  49. [57]

    Fmr-related phenomena in spintronic devices

    Yi Wang, Rajagopalan Ramaswamy, and Hyunsoo Yang. Fmr-related phenomena in spintronic devices. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , 51(27):273002, 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    Giant field-like torque by the out-of-plane magnetic spin hall effect in a topological antiferromagnet.Nature commu- nications, 12(1):6491, 2021

    Kouta Kondou, Hua Chen, Takahiro Tomita, Muhammad Ikhlas, Tomoya Higo, Allan H MacDonald, Satoru Nakatsuji, and YoshiChika Otani. Giant field-like torque by the out-of-plane magnetic spin hall effect in a topological antiferromagnet.Nature commu- nications, 12(1):6491, 2021

    2021

  51. [59]

    C. Kittel. On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance absorption.Phys. Rev., 73:155, Jan 1948

    1948

  52. [60]

    Origin of magnetization auto- oscillations in constriction-based spin hall nano-oscillators

    Mykola Dvornik, Ahmad A Awad, and Johan Åkerman. Origin of magnetization auto- oscillations in constriction-based spin hall nano-oscillators. Physical Review Applied , 9(1):014017, 2018

    2018

  53. [61]

    Tuning the spin hall effect of pt from the moderately dirty to the superclean regime.Physical Review B , 94(6):060412, 2016

    Edurne Sagasta, Yasutomo Omori, Miren Isasa, Martin Gradhand, Luis E Hueso, Ya- suhiro Niimi, YoshiChika Otani, and Fèlix Casanova. Tuning the spin hall effect of pt from the moderately dirty to the superclean regime.Physical Review B , 94(6):060412, 2016. 18

    2016

  54. [62]

    Giant spin hall effect and magnetotransport in a ta/cofeb/mgo layered structure: A temperature dependence study

    Qiang Hao and Gang Xiao. Giant spin hall effect and magnetotransport in a ta/cofeb/mgo layered structure: A temperature dependence study. Physical Review B, 91(22):224413, 2015

    2015

  55. [63]

    Valenzuela, J

    Jairo Sinova, Sergio O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C.H. Back, and T. Jungwirth. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys., 87(4):1213–1260, October 2015

    2015

  56. [64]

    Gadolinium-heavy rare earth alloys: preparation, metallographic study and extraordinary hall effect.Journal of the Less Common Metals , 90(2):177–201, 1983

    R Asomoza, A Fert, and R Reich. Gadolinium-heavy rare earth alloys: preparation, metallographic study and extraordinary hall effect.Journal of the Less Common Metals , 90(2):177–201, 1983

    1983

  57. [65]

    Fabrication of voltage-gated spin Hall nano-oscillators

    Akash Kumar, Mona Rajabali, Victor Hugo González, Mohammad Zahedinejad, Afshin Houshang, and Johan Åkerman. Fabrication of voltage-gated spin Hall nano-oscillators. Nanoscale, 14:1432–1439, 2022. 19

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.