Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Diffusion Monte Carlo calculation of compact $T_{cs0}$ and $T_{c\bar{s}0}$ tetraquarks

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that LHCb's $T_{cs0}(2870)$ and $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$ tetraquarks are compact, flavor-excited four-quark states with $F^2=16/3$ and isospin $I=1$, and predicts flavor-ground partners about 380--400 MeV lower.

desk verdict A competent, honest DMC calculation that makes a specific and testable claim, but the compact-sector assumption is load-bearing and the mass comparison needs a systematic error budget. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10346 v2 pith:GARO3VLF submitted 2025-07-14 hep-ph

M.C. Gordillo , J. Segovia This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords QuarkModelDiffusionMonteCarlo(DMC)open-charmtetraquarksTcs0(2870)Tcbar_s0(2900)flavorexcitedstatesisospinassignmentAL1potential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what the open-charm scalar tetraquark candidates $T_{cs0}(2870)$ and $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$ are, and answers that they are compact four-quark states in the excited flavor representation. Solving a non-relativistic constituent quark model with fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo, the authors find that the only flavor configurations whose masses match experiment have $F^2 = 16/3$ and isospin $I=1$; the $F^2 = 10/3$ ground flavor configurations lie about 380 to 400 MeV lower. The calculation therefore assigns $I=1$ to $T_{cs0}(2870)$, a quantum number that experiment has not fixed, and predicts a lighter pair of tetraquarks that should exist if the assignment is right. The result matters because it turns two recently seen resonances into a specific statement about their internal flavor symmetry and gives a concrete target for future searches.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo applied to the non-relativistic Hamiltonian with the AL1 quark potential (one-gluon exchange plus a linear confining term). The trial wavefunction factorizes into a symmetric spatial part $\prod_{j>i}\exp(-a_{ij}r_{ij})$ and exact eigenvectors of the color, spin, and flavor operators, with the flavor part taken as one of the two allowed $F^2$ eigenfunctions built from the $I^2$ eigenstates of the three light quarks. Antisymmetry under exchange of identical quarks is imposed by combining the antisymmetric/symmetric color functions with the corresponding spin functions and the chosen flavor function. Because the nodes lie entirely in the spin-flavor-color part and are known exactly, the fixed-node algorithm converges to the minimum energy compatible with the compact sector; switching to a meson-meson trial wavefunction would place the nodes differently and give a different, lower energy. The isospin operator $I^2$ selects which $F^2$ eigenfunction is physical, which is how the calculation assigns $I=1$ to $T_{cs0}(2870)$.

What would settle it

Search the same $B$-decay spectra for the predicted $F^2=10/3$ partners near $2594$ MeV ($\bar u\bar d s c$) and $2526$ MeV ($\bar s\bar u d c$); if they are absent well within experimental sensitivity, the excited-flavor assignment is undercut. A second decisive test is to repeat the DMC calculation with a meson-meson trial wavefunction: if it converges to an energy substantially below $2912$ or $2920$ MeV, the compact sector is not the ground state being observed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the observed $T_{cs0}(2870)$ and $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$ are compact tetraquarks in their excited flavor states. For quark content $\bar u\bar d s c$, the DMC masses are $2594\pm2$ MeV for $F^2=10/3$ and $2912\pm2$ MeV for $F^2=16/3$, the latter to be compared with the experimental $2872\pm16$ MeV; for $\bar s\bar u d c/\bar s\bar d u c$ the corresponding numbers are $2526\pm3$ and $2920\pm3$ MeV, compared with the combined experimental value near $2908$ MeV. Since the $F^2=16/3$ eigenfunction of the $\bar u\bar d s c$ system is the one with isospin $I=1$, the paper assigns unambiguously $I=1$ to $T_{cs0}(2870)$, and it explains the already-assigned $I=1$ for $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$. The paper also claims that the radial distribution functions show all quark pairs peaking in the same 0.5--1 fm region, with no separated cluster pattern, so the states are compact rather than molecular or diquark-antidiquark arrangements.

Load-bearing premise

The physical resonances are compact four-quark states whose energy in the AL1 potential can be compared directly with the experimental masses; the paper explicitly excludes meson-meson and diquark configurations that could lower the energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The isospin of $T_{cs0}(2870)$ is fixed to $I=1$, because only the $F^2=16/3$ flavor eigenfunction matches the measured mass.
  • A lighter pair of compact tetraquarks exists with $F^2=10/3$: one near $2594$ MeV with $\bar u\bar d s c$ and one near $2526$ MeV with $\bar s\bar u d c$, roughly 380--400 MeV below the observed states.
  • All four computed states are compact, with all quark-pair radial distributions peaking in the 0.5--1 fm range and no separated cluster-cluster structure.
  • The AL1 potential, used with the same Hamiltonian, reproduces the masses of the mesons that could form two-meson thresholds, supporting the mass scale of the comparison.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors do not spell out is that the $F^2=10/3$ ground states could already be present as broad or threshold-hidden enhancements in the same $B$-decay data sets, and a targeted re-analysis near $2526$ and $2594$ MeV would be a direct test.
  • A second extension is that the $I=1$ assignment for $T_{cs0}(2870)$ predicts an isospin pattern in its decay products, which could be checked in charged versus neutral pion final states.
  • A caution that follows from the method: 'compact' here means lowest energy within the compact fixed-node sector, so the calculation does not by itself rule out a molecular or coupled-channel description; a DMC run that includes meson-meson trial sectors would settle which picture has the lower energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) calculations of four-quark states with quark contents \bar u \bar d s c and \bar s \bar u d c / \bar s \bar d u c, using the AL1 constituent quark model. The trial wavefunctions are built from eigenvectors of spin, color, flavor, and isospin operators, so the calculation is restricted to compact tetraquark configurations. For each quark content the authors find two states, with flavor eigenvalues F2=10/3 and F2=16/3. The computed masses are 2594 and 2912 MeV for \bar u \bar d s c, and 2526 and 2920 MeV for \bar s \bar u d c, with statistical errors of 2-3 MeV. The paper identifies the higher F2=16/3 states with the LHCb Tcs0(2870) and Tc\bar{s}0(2900) resonances, assigns isospin I=1 to Tcs0, and predicts lower-mass F2=10/3 partner states. Radial distribution functions are shown and interpreted as evidence of compact structure.

Significance. If the identification is correct, the paper provides a concrete constituent-quark-model interpretation of two open-charm tetraquark candidates as compact, flavor-excited states, assigns an isospin to Tcs0 that LHCb has not determined, and predicts two new tetraquark states that could be searched for. The DMC machinery is technically solid, the statistical errors are small, the spin-flavor-color construction is explicit, and the AL1 benchmarks for mesons and baryons give some confidence in the Hamiltonian. These are real strengths. The significance is currently limited, however, because the central identification hinges on a direct mass comparison that lacks a systematic error estimate and that is made in a model space which deliberately omits the meson-meson channels that lie very close in energy. The compactness evidence is also partly circular, since the trial function and fixed nodes cannot explore non-compact configurations. The prediction of ground-flavor partners is falsifiable and is the most robust output of the calculation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Table 2] The central identification of the F2=16/3 states with Tcs0(2870) and Tc\bar{s}0(2900) rests on a direct comparison of compact DMC masses with experimental masses, but the only quoted uncertainties are the DMC statistical errors of 2-3 MeV. For Tcs0 the calculated mass is 2912 MeV versus the experimental 2872 MeV, a 40 MeV discrepancy that is several times the typical AL1 benchmark discrepancies for the S=1 mesons listed in the same table (e.g., \bar us: 904 vs 892/896 MeV; \bar uc: 2017 vs 2007/2010 MeV). Because the isospin assignment for Tcs0 follows entirely from this mass proximity, the paper needs an estimate of the systematic error of the AL1 model in the four-quark sector, for example from parameter variation or from a benchmark against a known tetraquark, before the F2=16/3 and I=1 claims can be regarded as established.
  2. [Sec. 3, Table 2] The calculation deliberately omits meson-meson channels, as stated in Sec. 3: “we have chosen to model the system as compact, not as a set of meson × meson spin-flavor-color configurations.” Yet the F2=16/3 compact masses, 2912 and 2920 MeV, lie within 1-9 MeV of the S=1 two-meson thresholds at 2921 MeV and 39-47 MeV above the \bar ud + \bar sc threshold at 2873 MeV. In this near-degenerate situation, the omitted continuum is expected to mix strongly with the compact state and shift its mass by an uncontrolled amount. A direct comparison of the compact DMC mass with the experimental mass is therefore not a reliable way to identify the observed states; the authors should either include the meson-meson channels in a coupled DMC calculation or provide a quantitative estimate of the continuum-coupling energy shift.
  3. [Sec. 3, Fig. 1] The radial distribution functions are presented as evidence that the tetraquarks are compact, but this conclusion is imposed by construction. Because the trial function and fixed nodes are restricted to the compact sector, the DMC walkers cannot explore meson-meson or diquark configurations, so the absence of the “three-function splitting” seen for X(3872) in Ref. Gordillo et al. (2021) does not discriminate between compact and molecular structures. This limitation should be stated explicitly, and the compactness claim should be softened unless a calculation with both compact and molecular trial functions is performed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3] The statement that the F2=10/3 partners lie “about 380 to 400 MeV lower” is imprecise: for \bar u \bar d s c the splitting is 318 MeV (2912-2594 MeV), while for \bar s \bar u d c it is 394 MeV (2920-2526 MeV).
  2. [Eq. (8)] The index notation in Eq. (8) is inconsistent: the left side uses \Psi_{\alpha'} and the right side \Psi_{\alpha}, with the sum over \alpha' implicit. Please clarify the matrix structure of the imaginary-time evolution, and fix the punctuation after “t \to \infty .” in the following sentence.
  3. [Eq. (10)] “For this trial function to be a valid, it has to be built” should read “to be a valid trial function” or “to be valid.”
  4. [Table 2] The experimental Tc\bar{s}0 mass is listed as 2908 MeV, but the two LHCb values are 2892 and 2921 MeV; the averaging procedure should be stated.
  5. [References] References Ma et al. 2023a and 2023b appear to be the same paper, and the title of Chen et al. 2024 contains the duplicated phrase “Strong decays of strong decays of”; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hamiltonian parameters come from external fits to meson and baryon spectra, the DMC method is standard, and the LHCb masses enter only at the comparison stage.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The AL1 potential parameters are taken from Refs. Semay and Silvestre-Brac (1994) and Silvestre-Brac (1996), which are fits to meson and baryon spectra; the paper does not adjust any parameter to reproduce the tetraquark masses. The DMC method is a standard imaginary-time projection technique, and the trial function is explicitly stated to be non-load-bearing: 'any initial guess with a non-negligible overlap with the real ground state will produce the exact solution for t → ∞.' The flavor states F2=10/3 and F2=16/3 are both computed and reported for each composition, and the experimental masses appear only in Table 2 for comparison. The identification of Tcs0(2870) as the F2=16/3, I=1 state is a postdiction based on computed mass proximity (2912 MeV versus 2872 MeV), not an input to the calculation. The paper's acknowledged restriction to compact configurations ('we have chosen to model the system as compact, not as a set of meson × meson spin-flavor-color configurations') is a model assumption that affects the physical interpretation and systematic uncertainty, but it is not a circular step: the computed energy is the minimum energy compatible with the chosen compact symmetry sector, and the absence of meson-meson channels is an approximation rather than a fitted input. Self-citations to prior DMC work by the same group are methodological references, not load-bearing evidence for the central mass comparison, and the AL1 benchmarks are external. No equation is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The most serious concerns, such as the proximity of the F2=16/3 masses to S=1 two-meson thresholds (2912 MeV versus 2921 MeV for Tcs0; 2920 MeV versus 2921 MeV for Tcsbar0) and the resulting sensitivity to omitted continuum coupling, are correctness risks rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters; all listed parameters are inherited from the AL1 potential fitted to ordinary mesons and baryons. The physical interpretation depends on the compact-sector assumption and the fixed-node DMC approximation. The only new entities are the predicted ground-flavor tetraquark states.

free parameters (9)
  • u/d quark mass m_u=m_d = 0.315 GeV
    Inherited from AL1 fit to meson and baryon spectra (Silvestre-Brac 1996); enters kinetic term in Eq. (3) and OGE potential.
  • strange quark mass m_s = 0.577 GeV
    Inherited from AL1 fit; enters kinetic term and potential for tetraquark.
  • charm quark mass m_c = 1.836 GeV
    Inherited from AL1 fit; enters kinetic term and potential for tetraquark.
  • OGE strong coupling alpha_s = 0.3802
    Inherited from AL1 fit; sets strength of Coulomb and hyperfine terms in Eq. (5).
  • OGE regularization parameter kappa = 3.6711
    Inherited from AL1 fit; controls smeared delta function in hyperfine term, Eq. (6).
  • r0 scale parameter A = 1.6553
    Inherited from AL1 fit; defines regularization range r0 in Eq. (6).
  • r0 exponent B = 0.2204
    Inherited from AL1 fit; defines mass dependence of r0 in Eq. (6).
  • confinement strength b = 0.1653 GeV^2
    Inherited from AL1 fit; sets slope of linear confinement in Eq. (7).
  • energy origin Delta = -0.8321 GeV
    Inherited from AL1 fit; shifts overall energy scale in confinement potential, Eq. (7).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The nonrelativistic constituent quark model with the AL1 potential describes tetraquark masses.
    Eqs. (3)-(7) and Table 1; the potential is fitted to mesons and baryons and is assumed to extrapolate to four-quark compact states.
  • domain assumption Fixed-node DMC with trial functions built from exact spin-flavor-color eigenstates yields the lowest energy state in the compact symmetry sector.
    Sec. 2 and beginning of Sec. 3; the nodal correctness is asserted, and performance for multicomponent spin-color wavefunctions is not demonstrated by benchmark tests on tetraquarks.
  • domain assumption The observed Tcs0 and Tcbar_s0 resonances are compact four-quark states rather than meson-meson molecules or diquark-antidiquark states.
    Sec. 1 and Sec. 3; the calculation deliberately excludes meson-meson configurations, so the conclusion is conditional on this choice.
  • standard math Standard group-theoretic classification of flavor, spin, and color eigenstates, including antisymmetrization via Eq. (18).
    Eqs. (13)-(24); needed to construct the trial wavefunctions and to define ground and excited flavor states.
invented entities (1)
  • Ground-flavor tetraquark partners of Tcs0 and Tcbar_s0 independent evidence
    purpose: Predicted lower-mass counterparts with F2=10/3 at about 2.59 GeV (I=0 for Tcs0 content) and 2.53 GeV (I=1 for Tcbar_s0 content), proposed as targets for future searches.
    The paper assigns specific masses, quantum numbers, and quark contents, so future B or D_s decay measurements could confirm or exclude them; they are predictions, not inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffusion Monte Carlo calculation of compact $T_{cs0}$ and $T_{c\bar{s}0}$ tetraquarks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GARO3VLF

@misc{pith2026250710346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffusion Monte Carlo calculation of compact $T_cs0$ and $T_c\bars0$ tetraquarks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GARO3VLF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10346}
}
abstract

The LHCb collaboration amplitude analysis of the decays $B^+ \to D^+ D^- K^+$, $B^+ \to D^- D_s^+ \pi^+$, and $B^0 \to \bar{D}^0 D_s^+ \pi^-$ suggested the existence of two new resonant $J^P=0^+$ states with minimum quark content $\bar{u} \bar{d} s c$ and $\bar{s} \bar{u} d c$/$\bar{s} \bar{d} u c$, named $T_{cs0}$ and $T_{c\bar{s}0}$, respectively. In this work, we used the diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) method to compute the masses of those tetraquarks within the framework of the constituent quark model. We describe the systems as compact structures, not as diquark/antidiquark or meson/meson arrangements. In this context, compact means that we used directly the eigenvectors of the spin, color and flavor operators without any splitting and/or (re)combination of smaller units. This allows us to deduce the existence of two distinct bound configurations for each composition, corresponding to ground and excited flavor states. In both cases, the excited flavor states are the ones with masses comparable to the ones observed by LHCb. In addition, our analysis allows us to assign unambiguously an isospin value of $I$=1 to the experimentally obtained $T_{cs0}$ tetraquark.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10346 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Radial distribution functions of the ground and ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Singly heavy tetraquarks

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid quark model with gluon and meson exchange predicts that LHCb's T-c̄s̄0(2870) and T-cs̄0(2900) are compact tetraquarks, and that Ds0(2317), Ds1(2460), Tbs(5568), and Tcs(2327) are not.

  2. Sexaquarks and $H$ dibaryons in the $uuddss$ system: a comparison within a constituent quark model

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a constituent quark model, only baryon-baryon-like configurations of the uuddss system produce near-threshold states appearing as loosely bound three-quark clusters.

  3. Sexaquarks and $H$ dibaryons in the $uuddss$ system: a comparison within a constituent quark model

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a constituent quark model, only forced baryon–baryon-like uuddss configurations yield loosely bound near-threshold states; fully antisymmetrized sexaquarks remain compact and above threshold.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    author Aaij, R. , et al. ( collaboration LHCb ), year 2020 a. title A model-independent study of resonant structure in B^+ D^+D^-K^+ decays . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 125 , pages 242001 . :10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.242001, http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00025 arXiv:2009.00025

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    author Aaij, R. , et al. ( collaboration LHCb ), year 2020 b. title Amplitude analysis of the B^+ D^+D^-K^+ decay . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 102 , pages 112003 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.102.112003, http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00026 arXiv:2009.00026

    arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    author Aaij, R. , et al. ( collaboration LHCb ), year 2023 a. title Amplitude analysis of B0 D 0Ds+ - and B+ D-Ds+ + decays . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 108 , pages 012017 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.108.012017, http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.02717 arXiv:2212.02717

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    author Aaij, R. , et al. ( collaboration LHCb ), year 2023 b. title First Observation of a Doubly Charged Tetraquark and Its Neutral Partner . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 131 , pages 041902 . :10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041902, http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.02716 arXiv:2212.02716

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    , author Azizi, K

    author Agaev, S.S. , author Azizi, K. , author Sundu, H. , year 2021 . title New scalar resonance X 0(2900) as a molecule: mass and width . journal J. Phys. G volume 48 , pages 085012 . :10.1088/1361-6471/ac0b31, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.13027 arXiv:2008.13027

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    , author Narison, S

    author Albuquerque, R.M. , author Narison, S. , author Rabetiarivony, D. , author Randriamanatrika, G. , year 2021 . title X_ 0,1 (2900) and (D^-K^+) invariant mass from QCD Laplace sum rules at NLO . journal Nucl. Phys. A volume 1007 , pages 122113 . :10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122113, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.13463 arXiv:2008.13463

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    , author Gordillo, M.C

    author Alcaraz-Pelegrina, J.M. , author Gordillo, M.C. , year 2022 . title Diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of fully heavy compact hexaquarks . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 106 , pages 114028 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114028, http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13886 arXiv:2205.13886

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    , year 2018

    author Amsler, C. , year 2018 . title The quark structure of hadrons. Lecture Notes in Physics 949 . publisher Springer

    work page 2018

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    , author Lu, S

    author Bai, Y. , author Lu, S. , author Osborne, J. , year 2019 . title Beauty-full Tetraquarks . journal Phys. Lett. B volume 798 , pages 134930 . :10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134930, http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00012 arXiv:1612.00012

    2019

  2. [10]

    , author Casulleras, J

    author Boronat, J. , author Casulleras, J. , year 1994 . title Monte Carlo analysis of an interatomic potential for He . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 49 , pages 8920--8930 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.8920, :10.1103/PhysRevB.49.8920

    1994 doi

  3. [11]

    , author Swanson, E.S

    author Burns, T.J. , author Swanson, E.S. , year 2021 a. title Discriminating among interpretations for the X(2900) states . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 103 , pages 014004 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014004, http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05352 arXiv:2009.05352

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    , author Swanson, E.S

    author Burns, T.J. , author Swanson, E.S. , year 2021 b. title Kinematical cusp and resonance interpretations of the X(2900) . journal Phys. Lett. B volume 813 , pages 136057 . :10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136057, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12838 arXiv:2008.12838

    2021

  5. [13]

    , year 2022

    author Chen, H.X. , year 2022 . title Hadronic molecules in B decays . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 105 , pages 094003 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.105.094003, http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.08586 arXiv:2103.08586

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    , author Chen, W

    author Chen, H.X. , author Chen, W. , author Dong, R.R. , author Su, N. , year 2020 . title X_0 (2900) and X_1 (2900): Hadronic Molecules or Compact Tetraquarks . journal Chin. Phys. Lett. volume 37 , pages 101201 . :10.1088/0256-307X/37/10/101201, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07...

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    , author Chen, W

    author Chen, H.X. , author Chen, W. , author Liu, X. , author Liu, Y.R. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2017 a. title A review of the open charm and open bottom systems . journal Rept. Prog. Phys. volume 80 , pages 076201 . :10.1088/1361-6633/aa6420, http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08928 ...

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    , author Chen, W

    author Chen, H.X. , author Chen, W. , author Liu, X. , author Liu, Y.R. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2023 . title An updated review of the new hadron states . journal Rept. Prog. Phys. volume 86 , pages 026201 . :10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6, http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02649 arXiv:2204.02649

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    , author Chen, H.X

    author Chen, W. , author Chen, H.X. , author Liu, X. , author Steele, T.G. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2017 b. title Open-flavor charm and bottom sq q Q and qq q Q tetraquark states . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 95 , pages 114005 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.11...

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    , author Chen, H.X

    author Chen, W. , author Chen, H.X. , author Liu, X. , author Steele, T.G. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2024 . title Strong decays of strong decays of t^a_ c s 0 (2900)^ ++/0 as a fully open-flavor tetraquark state . journal Eur. Phy. J. C volume 84 , pages 1 . :10.1140/epjc/s100...

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    , author Han, J.J

    author Chen, Y.K. , author Han, J.J. , author L\"u, Q.F. , author Wang, J.P. , author Yu, F.S. , year 2021 . title Branching fractions of B^- D^-X_ 0,1 (2900) and their implications . journal Eur. Phys. J. C volume 81 , pages 71 . :10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08857-8, http://arxiv...

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    , author Li, S.Y

    author Cheng, J.B. , author Li, S.Y. , author Liu, Y.R. , author Liu, Y.N. , author Si, Z.G. , author Yao, T. , year 2020 . title Spectrum and rearrangement decays of tetraquark states with four different flavors . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 101 , pages 114017 . :10.1103/Phys...

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    , author Guo, F.K

    author Dong, X.K. , author Guo, F.K. , author Zou, B.S. , year 2021 a. title A survey of heavy heavy hadronic molecules . journal Commun. Theor. Phys. volume 73 , pages 125201 . :10.1088/1572-9494/ac27a2, http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02673 arXiv:2108.02673

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , author Guo, F.K

    author Dong, X.K. , author Guo, F.K. , author Zou, B.S. , year 2021 b. title Explaining the Many Threshold Structures in the Heavy-Quark Hadron Spectrum . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 126 , pages 152001 . :10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.152001, http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.14517 arXi...

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    , author Zou, B.S

    author Dong, X.K. , author Zou, B.S. , year 2021 . title Prediction of possible DK_1 bound states . journal Eur. Phys. J. A volume 57 , pages 139 . :10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00442-7, http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11619 arXiv:2009.11619

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    , author Valcarce, A

    author Garcilazo, H. , author Valcarce, A. , year 2020 . title Hidden and Open Heavy-Flavor Hadronic States . journal Few Body Syst. volume 61 , pages 24 . :10.1007/s00601-020-01557-1, http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.06046 arXiv:2007.06046

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    , year 1964

    author Gell-Mann, M. , year 1964 . title A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons . journal Phys. Lett. volume 8 , pages 214--215 . :10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

    1964 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Alcaraz-Pelegrina, J.M

    author Gordillo, M.C. , author Alcaraz-Pelegrina, J.M. , year 2023 . title Asymptotic mass limit of large fully heavy compact multiquarks . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 108 , pages 054027 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054027, http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08408 arXiv:2307.08408

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    , author De Soto, F

    author Gordillo, M.C. , author De Soto, F. , author Segovia, J. , year 2020 . title Diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of fully-heavy multiquark bound states . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 102 , pages 114007 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.102.114007, http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11889 arXiv:...

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    , author De Soto, F

    author Gordillo, M.C. , author De Soto, F. , author Segovia, J. , year 2021 . title Structure of the X(3872) as explained by a diffusion Monte Carlo calculation . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 104 , pages 054036 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054036, http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11976 arX...

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , author De Soto, F

    author Gordillo, M.C. , author De Soto, F. , author Segovia, J. , year 2022 . title X(3872) s excitation and its connection with production at hadron colliders . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 106 , pages 094004 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.106.094004, http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04221 arXi...

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    , author Segovia, J

    author Gordillo, M.C. , author Segovia, J. , year 2024 . title Heavy multiquark systems as clusters of smaller units: A diffusion Monte Carlo calculation . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 109 , pages 094032 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094032, http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15000 arXiv:2403.15000

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    , author Segovia, J

    author Gordillo, M.C. , author Segovia, J. , author Alcaraz-Pelegrina, J.M. , year 2024 . title Diffusion Monte Carlo calculation of fully heavy pentaquarks . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 110 , pages 094024 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094024, http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04130 arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    , author Hanhart, C

    author Guo, F.K. , author Hanhart, C. , author Mei ner, U.G. , author Wang, Q. , author Zhao, Q. , author Zou, B.S. , year 2018 . title Hadronic molecules . journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 90 , pages 015004 . :10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004, http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00141 arXiv:...

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    , author Lester, W

    author Hammond, B. , author Lester, W. , author Reynolds, P. , year 1994 . title Monte Carlo Methods in ab Initio Quantum Chemistry . publisher World Scientific , address Singapore

    1994

  26. [34]

    , author Chen, D.Y

    author He, J. , author Chen, D.Y. , year 2021 . title Molecular picture for X_0(2900) and X_1(2900) . journal Chin. Phys. C volume 45 , pages 063102 . :10.1088/1674-1137/abeda8, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07782 arXiv:2008.07782

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    , author Wang, W

    author He, X.G. , author Wang, W. , author Zhu, R. , year 2020 . title Open-charm tetraquark X_c and open-bottom tetraquark X_b . journal Eur. Phys. J. C volume 80 , pages 1026 . :10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08597-1, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07145 arXiv:2008.07145

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    , author Lao, X.Y

    author Hu, M.W. , author Lao, X.Y. , author Ling, P. , author Wang, Q. , year 2021 . title X_0 (2900) and its heavy quark spin partners in molecular picture . journal Chin. Phys. C volume 45 , pages 021003 . :10.1088/1674-1137/abcfaa, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06894 arXiv:2008.06894

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Richard, A.Valcarce, J

    author J.M. Richard, A.Valcarce, J. , year 2017 . title Stable heavy pentaquarks in constituent models . journal Phys. Lett. B volume 774 , pages 710--714 . :10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.036, http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.08239 arXiv:1710.08239

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    , author Rosner, J.L

    author Karliner, M. , author Rosner, J.L. , year 2020 . title First exotic hadron with open heavy flavor: cs u d tetraquark . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 102 , pages 094016 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.102.094016, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05993 arXiv:2008.05993

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    , author Xie, J.J

    author Liu, M.Z. , author Xie, J.J. , author Geng, L.S. , year 2020 a. title X_0(2866) as a D^* K ^* molecular state . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 102 , pages 091502 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.102.091502, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07389 arXiv:2008.07389

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author Yan, M.J

    author Liu, X.H. , author Yan, M.J. , author Ke, H.W. , author Li, G. , author Xie, J.J. , year 2020 b. title Triangle singularity as the origin of X_0(2900) and X_1(2900) observed in B^+ D^+ D^- K^+ . journal Eur. Phys. J. C volume 80 , pages 1178 . :10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-0...

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    , author Chen, H.X

    author Liu, Y.R. , author Chen, H.X. , author Chen, W. , author Liu, X. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2019 . title Pentaquark and Tetraquark states . journal Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. volume 107 , pages 237--320 . :10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003, http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11976 arXiv:1903.11976

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    , author Meng, L

    author Ma, Y. , author Meng, L. , author Chen, Y.K. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2023 a. title Ground state baryons in the flux-tube three-body confinement model using diffusion monte carlo . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 107 , pages 054035 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRe...

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    , author Meng, L

    author Ma, Y. , author Meng, L. , author Chen, Y.K. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2023 b. title Ground state baryons in the flux-tube three-body confinement model using diffusion Monte Carlo . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 107 , pages 054035 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054035, http://ar...

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    , author Meng, L

    author Ma, Y. , author Meng, L. , author Chen, Y.K. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2024 . title Doubly heavy tetraquark states in the constituent quark model using diffusion Monte Carlo method . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 109 , pages 074001 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074001, http://a...

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    , author Mei ner, U.G

    author Mai, M. , author Mei ner, U.G. , author Urbach, C. , year 2023 . title Towards a theory of hadron resonances . journal Phys. Rept. volume 1001 , pages 1--66 . :10.1016/j.physrep.2022.11.005, http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01477 arXiv:2206.01477

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    , author Chen, Y.K

    author Meng, L. , author Chen, Y.K. , author Ma, Y. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2023 . title Tetraquark bound states in constituent quark models: Benchmark test calculations . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 108 , pages 114016 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114016, ...

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    , author Branz, T

    author Molina, R. , author Branz, T. , author Oset, E. , year 2010 . title A new interpretation for the D^*_ s2 (2573) and the prediction of novel exotic charmed mesons . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 82 , pages 014010 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.82.014010, http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.033...

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    , author Oset, E

    author Molina, R. , author Oset, E. , year 2020 . title Molecular picture for the X_0(2866) as a D^* K ^* J^P=0^+ state and related 1^+,2^+ states . journal Phys. Lett. B volume 811 , pages 135870 . :10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135870, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11171 arXiv:2008.11171

    2020

  41. [49]

    , author Oset, E

    author Molina, R. , author Oset, E. , year 2023 . title Tcs (2900) as a threshold effect from the interaction of the D*K*, Ds* channels . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 107 , pages 056015 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056015, http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01302 arXiv:2211.01302

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    , year 2024

    author Mutuk, H. , year 2024 . title Masses and magnetic moments of doubly heavy tetraquarks via diffusion Monte Carlo method . journal Eur. Phys. J. C volume 84 , pages 395 . :10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12736-3, http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13383 arXiv:2312.13383

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    ( collaboration Particle Data Group Collaboration ), year 2024

    author Navas, S.e.a. ( collaboration Particle Data Group Collaboration ), year 2024 . title Review of particle physics . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 110 , pages 030001 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001, :10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    , author Entem, D.R

    author Ortega, P.G. , author Entem, D.R. , year 2021 . title Coupling hadron-hadron thresholds within a chiral quark model approach . journal Symmetry volume 13 , pages 279 . :10.3390/sym13020279, http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10105 arXiv:2012.10105

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    , author Entem, D.R

    author Ortega, P.G. , author Entem, D.R. , author Fernandez, F. , author Segovia, J. , year 2023 . title Novel Tcs and Tcs candidates in a constituent-quark-model-based meson-meson coupled-channels calculation . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 108 , pages 094035 . :10.1103/PhysRev...

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    , author Albertus, C

    author Segovia, J. , author Albertus, C. , author Entem, D.R. , author Fern\'andez, F. , author Hern\'andez, E. , author P\'erez-Garc\' a, M.A. , year 2011 . title Semileptonic b and B _ s decays into orbitally excited charmed mesons . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 84 , pages 09...

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    , author Silvestre-Brac, B

    author Semay, C. , author Silvestre-Brac, B. , year 1994 . title Diquonia and potential models . journal Z. Phys. C volume 61 , pages 271--275 . :10.1007/BF01413104

    1994 doi

  48. [56]

    , year 1996

    author Silvestre-Brac, B. , year 1996 . title Spectrum and static properties of heavy baryons . journal Few Body Syst. volume 20 , pages 1--25 . :10.1007/s006010050028

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    , author Ping, J

    author Tan, Y. , author Ping, J. , year 2021 . title X(2900) in a chiral quark model . journal Chin. Phys. C volume 45 , pages 093104 . :10.1088/1674-1137/ac0ba4, http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04045 arXiv:2010.04045

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    , author Meng, L

    author Wang, G.J. , author Meng, L. , author Xiao, L.Y. , author Oka, M. , author Zhu, S.L. , year 2021 . title Mass spectrum and strong decays of tetraquark c s qq states . journal Eur. Phys. J. C volume 81 , pages 188 . :10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08978-0, http://arxiv.org/abs/...

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    , year 2020

    author Wang, Z.G. , year 2020 . title Analysis of the X_0(2900) as the scalar tetraquark state via the QCD sum rules . journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. A volume 35 , pages 2050187 . :10.1142/S0217751X20501870, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07833 arXiv:2008.07833

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    , author Wang, Y.H

    author Wei, J. , author Wang, Y.H. , author An, C.S. , author Deng, C.R. , year 2022 . title Color flux-tube nature of the states Tcs(2900) and Tcs a(2900) . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 106 , pages 096023 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.106.096023, http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04841 arXiv:2210.04841

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , author Chen, D.Y

    author Xiao, C.J. , author Chen, D.Y. , author Dong, Y.B. , author Meng, G.W. , year 2021 . title Study of the decays of S- wave D^ K^ hadronic molecules: The scalar X_0(2900) and its spin partners X_ J(J=1,2) . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 103 , pages 034004 . :10.1103/PhysRev...

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    , author Jin, X

    author Xue, Y. , author Jin, X. , author Huang, H. , author Ping, J. , year 2021 . title Tetraquarks with open charm flavor . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 103 , pages 054010 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054010, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09516 arXiv:2008.09516

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    , author Ping, J

    author Yang, G. , author Ping, J. , author Segovia, J. , year 2020 . title Tetra- and penta-quark structures in the constituent quark model . journal Symmetry volume 12 , pages 1869 . :10.3390/sym12111869, http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00238 arXiv:2009.00238

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    , author Ping, J

    author Yang, G. , author Ping, J. , author Segovia, J. , year 2021 . title sQ q q (q=u,\,d;\, Q=c,\,b) tetraquarks in the chiral quark model . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 103 , pages 074011 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074011, http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04933 arXiv:2101.04933

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    , author Xin, Q

    author Yang, X.S. , author Xin, Q. , author Wang, Z.G. , year 2023 . title Analysis of the Tcs(2900) and related tetraquark states with the QCD sum rules . journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. A volume 38 , pages 2350056 . :10.1142/S0217751X23500562, http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01718 arXi...

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    , author Xiao, C.J

    author Yue, Z.L. , author Xiao, C.J. , author Chen, D.Y. , year 2023 . title Decays of the fully open flavor state Tcs 00 in a D*K* molecule scenario . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 107 , pages 034018 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034018, http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03018 arXiv:2212.03018

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    , year 2021

    author Zhang, J.R. , year 2021 . title Open-charm tetraquark candidate: Note on X_0 (2900) . journal Phys. Rev. D volume 103 , pages 054019 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054019, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07295 arXiv:2008.07295

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    , year 1964

    author Zweig, G. , year 1964 . title Developments in the quark theory of hadrons . journal CERN Report No.8182/TH.401, CERN Report No.8419/TH.412

    1964

  61. [69]

    2015, , 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, , 579, A101

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.